propolis.pdf

1

Transcript of propolis.pdf

  • Vol. 20 No. 1 2001 5

    Effect of propolis and propolis-containing toothpaste on the

    formation of dental plaque in vitro

    MASARU SAT01, SHUU FUJIWARA2, MOTOHIKO NAGAYAMA1,

    RYOZO YAMAGUCHI3, CHIKAKO TOKUDA1, HIROSHI TAKEUCHI1,

    HIDEO YAMADA4, HIROYUKI SUGIM0T04 and KIYOSHI OKIHARA4

    Abstract : The effect of propolis collected in Brazil on the adsorption of Streptococcus sanguis to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite and on the coaggregation reaction between S. sanguis and Fusobacterium nucleatum was studied using radio-labeled bacterial cells. The antibacterial activity of a propolis-containing toothpaste against cariogenic and plaque-forming bacteria was also investigated. An ethanolic solution of propolis (10 and 20 mg/mL) significantly reduced bacterial adherence to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite (25.3% and 29.6%, p

  • 6 Vol. 20 No. 1 2001

    contains various plant-derived components and

    secreted beeswax12). Although the components of

    propolis vary depending on collection region of

    samples12), propolis has been shown to exhibit

    various pharmacological activities, including

    antibacterial, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, hypo-

    tensive and immuno-stimulatory properties 12-14)

    Ikeno et a1.15) first reported the inhibitory effects

    of propolis on the growth and glucosyltransferase

    activity of mutans streptococci and in vivo

    anti-caries potency in the rat. In addition to

    dental caries, propolis may show different

    beneficial activity for dental health due to its

    broad biological properties.

    In the present study, a propolis sample col-

    lected in Brazil was examined for its effect on

    bacterial adherence to the pellicle and

    coaggregation reaction, both of which play

    important roles in the formation and develop-

    ment of dental plaque. The antibacterial activity

    of propolis-containing toothpaste against

    cariogenic and plaque-forming bacteria was

    also investigated.

    Materials and Methods

    1. Propolis and propolis-containing toothpaste Propolis and a propolis-containing toothpaste

    were supplied by Yamada Apiculture Center, Inc. (Okayama, Japan). The propolis was col-lected in Brazil and pulverized and extracted with ethanol. The extract was filtered and then adjusted to 10% (w/v) with ethanol. The tooth-

    paste (Yamada Yohojo Propolis Hamigaki ; Yamada Apiculture Center, Inc) contains the same 10% ethanolic solution of propolis sample

    at a concentration of 2 % (w/w).

    2. Effect of propolis on adherence of Strepto-

    coccus San guis to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite disks

    Hydroxyapatite (HAP) disks (diameter: 7 mm,

    thickness 3.5 mm) were purchased from Pentax Co. Ltd., (Tokyo, Japan). The disks were held with small surgical forceps and hung from a silicon cap, and autoclaved. Parotid saliva was collected from a healthy male volunteer and sterilized by filtration. The disks were im-mersed in saliva for 30 min and then washed 3 times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS ; 0.01 M, pH 7.3).

    S. sanguis ATCC10556 was grown in Tryptic Soy Broth (Difco, Detroit, MI) containing [methyl-3H] thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Bioteh,

    Buckinghamshire, England) at a concentration of

    3 Ci/mL under an aerobic condition for 24 h at

    37. The cells were harvested by centrifugation

    and washed 4 times and resuspended in PBS at

    a concentration of approximately 109 cells/mL.

    There were approximately 30,000 dpm per 108

    radio-labeled cells. The saliva-coated HAP disks

    were immersed in ethanolic solutions contain-

    ing 10 and 20 mg/mL propolis for 30 min. After

    washing the disks 6 times with PBS, they were

    again immersed in a radio-labeled cell suspen-

    sion for 30 min at room temperature. Follow-

    ing the reaction, the disks were washed 3 times

    with PBS and then subjected to an automatic

    sample combustion system (ASC-113, Aloka,

    Tokyo, Japan) and radioactivity was measured

    using a liquid scintillation counter (LSC-900,

    Aloka). Control disks were immersed in etha-

    nol for 30 min and radioactivity was measured

    as described above. Three to five determina-

    tions were run for the experiment.

    3. Effect of propolis on the coaggregation reaction between S. San guis and Fusobacterium nucleatum The influence of propolis on the coaggregation reaction was investigated as previously de-scribed16). Briefly, saliva-coated HAP disks were incubated in Tryptic Soy Broth inoculated with

    S. sanguis for 5 days. The medium was ex-changed every 24 h. Following incubation, the disk surfaces were confirmed to be completely covered with bacterial cells by scanning electron microscopy. F. nucleatum ATCC25586 was grown in Tryptic Soy Broth enriched with 0.5% (w /v ) Yeast Extract (Difco) containing [5,6-3H] uracil (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) at a concentra-tion of 3,2 Ci/mL. The cells were collected and washed 4 times and resuspended in PBS (ap-

    proximately 109 cells/mL). The streptococcal cell-covered disks were washed 3 times with PBS and then immersed in ethanolic solutions containing propolis (10 and 20 mg/mL) for 30 min. One group of disks were immersed in a radio-labeled F. nucleatum cell suspension for 30 min without washing, and another group was washed 3 times with PBS and then immersed in a cell suspension. Following the reaction, the disks were washed 3 times with PBS and radio-activity was measured as described above. Control disks were immersed in ethanol for 30 min instead of propolis solution.

  • Vol. 20 No. 1 2001 anti-plaque activity of propolis 7

    4. Antibacterial activity of the toothpaste

    A total of 20 strains representing 12 species,

    listed in Table 4, were stock cultures of our

    laboratory. The strains were pre-incubated in

    Tryptic Soy Broth under anaerobic conditions

    and then resuspended in the medium to yield a

    concentration of 1 ~108 colony forming units/

    mL. The toothpaste was dissolved with steril-

    ized water and added to Tryptic Soy agar

    medium (5 % v/v ; final concentration range of 1-

    10 mg/mL ; 1 mg step). The agar plates were

    spotted with bacterial cell suspensions and

    incubated at 37 for 48 h under anaerobic

    conditions. The minimum inhibitory concentra-

    tion (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentra-

    tion at which no colony was observed after

    incubation.

    Results

    The formula of the toothpaste is shown in

    Table 1. The major constituents are propolis

    (as 10% ethanolic solution ; 2 %w/w), calcium

    carbonate (abrasive), tetradecensulphonic acid

    sodium (foaming agent), glycerin (humectant),

    vitamin E and hinokitiol (stabilizer), and water.

    The toothpaste does not contain any synthetic

    anti-mocrobial or anti-plaque compounds.

    As shown in Table 2, the propolis used in the

    present study strongly inhibited the adherence

    of S. sanguis cells to saliva-coated HAP disks.

    The average dpm of control disks was 14619}

    2193, while that of those treated with propolis

    were 10918}210 (10 mg/mL) and 10295}1099 (20

    mg/mL), respectively. The rates of decrease were

    25.3% and 29.6%, and both differences were

    statistically significant (p

  • 8 Vol. 20 No. 1 2001

    Table 4 Minimum inhibitory concentrations

    of propolis-containing toothpaste

    against cariogenic and plaque-forming bacteria.

    ited at 3-5 mg/mL, except for S. sobrinus 6715. Other mutans streptococci (S. cricetus and S. rattus) were inhibited at 4 and 6 mg/mL, respec-tively. Whereas S. sanguis ATCC10556 showed a relatively high MIC value (7 mg/mL), other oral streptococci including representative pio-neer species (S. sanguis, S. oralis and S. mitis) were inhibited at almost the same concentra-tions with S. mutans. Actinomyces viscosus, A.

    naeslundii and Lactobatillus casei showed relatively higher MIC values than those of

    streptococci.

    Discussion

    Following the first report of Ikeno et a1,15) concerning the anti-caries properties of propolis, several researchers demonstrated that the

    cariostatic action of propolis depends on its

    composition, consequently the region of propolis samples collections17,18). Thus, we preliminarily examined the antibacterial and anti-glucosyl-

    transferase activity of the used propolis against mutans streptococci, and found that the growth

    of 3 strains of S. mutans and 1 strain of S. sobrinus was inhibited at 5 mg/mL (by paper disk method) and glucan synthesis was reduced by approximately 10% at 10 mg/mL (data not shown).

    In addition to an inhibitory activity against mutans streptococci, the propolis sample strongly inhibited the adsorption of S. sanguis and S. mutans to saliva-coated HAP disks. Inhibition of the adsorption of streptococci to the pellicle has been shown to be an effective

    prophylaxic against dental plaque f ormation19). Given that the propolis sample showed marked

    precipitation in water, disks immersed in etha-nol served as controls. The observed effect of

    propolis is ascribable to the interaction between the pellicle and propolis components, an inter-action which competitively masked ligands and/ or receptors on the pellicle against S. sanguis.

    S. sanguis and F. nucleatum are representa-tive pioneer and secondary colonizers, respec-

    tively5) . They form a corncob configuration which is frequently observed in dental plaque20). Therefore, coaggregation between these species is believed to play an important role in the early stages of dental plaque development. Propolis used in the present study also strongly

    interfered with the coaggregation reaction. The inhibitory effect of propolis on the coag-

    gregation reaction is attributable to its ability to mask receptors and/or ligands on S. sanguis cell surfaces responsible for the reaction with F. nucleatum.

    Although the propolis sample used showed strong inhibitory effects on both adsorption of streptococci to the pellicle and coaggregation reaction, other propolis sample may exhibit altered influence on such interactions due to the difference of components12,17,18) Nishino et al.21) isolated 3 cinnamic acid compounds from Brazilian propolis, 3, 5-diprenyl-4-hydroxycin-namic acid, 3-prenyl-4-dihydrocinnamic acid and 3-prenyl-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, and found that they strongly inhibited the growth, acid produc-tion and synthesis of insoluble glucan of mutans streptococci. Thus, isolation and strac-tural determination of the substance(s) respon-

  • Vol. 20 No. 1 2001 anti-plaque activity of propolis 9

    sible for the observed inhibitory effects should

    be required in the future, and a study investi-

    gating such matters is currently underway.

    Propolis-containing toothpaste completely

    inhibited the growth of cariogenic and plaque-

    forming bacteria at a concentration range of 3-7

    mg / mL. The components other than propolis

    such as hinokitiol never showed inhibitory

    effects on bacterial growth at concentrations in

    the toothpaste. Thus, the observed antibacterial

    activity is mainly attributable to propolis. It

    has been reported that ethanol extracted propolis

    showed antibacterial activity against mutans

    streptococci at 800, g/mL, whereas water ex-

    tracted propolis did not21) . The observed MIC

    value is much lower than those of previously

    reported plant-derived compounds7,9,10,11) How-

    ever, the broad biological activity of propolis

    on oral bacteria might be useful as an inhibi-

    tory agent against dental plaque formation.

    References

    1) Marsh, P., et al: Oral microbiology. 3rd ed

    98`196 Chapman & Hall 1992.

    2) Embery, G., et al: Some considerations on

    the interaction between mucous glycoproteins

    and oral streptococci. 83`94 Information

    Retrieval Inc., 1981.

    3) Rosan, B. : Mechanisms of oral coloniza-

    tion. 283`298 Mosby Year Book 1992.

    4) Kolenbrander, P. E.: Coaggregations : ad-

    herence in the human oral microbial ecosys-

    tem. 303`329 American Society for Microbi-

    ology 1991.

    5) Kolenbrander, P. E.: Surface recognition

    among oral bacteria : multigeneric coaggreg-

    ations and their mediators. Crit Rev

    Microbiol 1989 17 :137`159.

    6) Godowski, K. C.: Antimicrobial action of

    sanguinarine. J Clin Dent 1989 1 : 96`101.

    7) Sakanaka, S., et al: Antibacterial substances

    in Japanese green tea extract against Strep-

    tococcus mutans, a cariogenic bacterium.

    Agric Biol Chem 1989 53 : 2307`2311.

    8) Sakanaka, S., et al : Inhibitory effects of green

    tea polyphenols on glucan synthesis and

    ellular adherence of cariogenic streptococci.

    Agric Biol Chem 1990 54 : 2925`2929.

    9) Sakanaka, S., et al: Preventive effect of green

    tea polyphenols against dental caries in

    conventional rats. Biosci Biotech Biochem

    1992 56 : 592`594.

    10) Tsuchiya, H., et al : Inhibition of the growth

    of cariogenic bacteria in vitro by plant

    flavanons. Experientia 1994 50 : 846`849.

    11) Sato, M., et al: Flavones with antibacterial

    activity against cariogenic bacteria. J

    Ethnopharmacol 1996 54 :171`176.

    12) Ghisalberti, E. L.: Propolis : A review. Bee

    World 1979 60 : 59`84.

    13) Bankova, V. S.,et al : A study on flavonoids

    of propolis. J Nat Prod 1983 46 : 471`474.

    14) Bankova, V. S., et al: Isopentenyl cinnamates

    from poplar buds and propolis. Phyto-

    chemistry 1983 28 : 871`873.

    15) Ikeno, K., et al : Effects of propolis on dental

    caries in rats. Caries Res 1991 25 : 347`351.

    16) Nagayama, M., et al: Evaluation of coag-

    gregation among Streptococcus mitis,

    Fuso bacterium nucleatum and Porphyro-

    monas gingivalis. Lett Appl Microbiol 2001,

    33 :1`4.

    17) Park, Y. K., et al: Antimicrobial activity

    of propolis on oral microorganisms. Curr

    Microbiol 1998 36 : 24`28.

    18) Koo, H., et al: Effect of Apis mellifera

    propolis from two Brazilian regions on

    caries development in desalivated rats.

    Caries Res 1999 33 : 393`400.

    19) Listgarten, M. A.: Pathogenesis of perio-

    dontitis. Periodontol 1986 13 : 418`430.

    20) Lancy, Jr. P., et al: Corncob formation

    between Fuso bacterium and Streptococcus

    sanguis. Infect Immun 1983 40 : 303`309.

    21) Nishio, M., et al: Anti-dental caries com-

    pounds in Brazilian propolis. Honeybee

    Science 1996 17 : 151`154.

  • 10 Vol. 20 No. 1 2001

    in vitro

    1, 2, 1,

    3, 1, 1,

    4, 4, 4

    ,

    Streptococcus sanguis S.sanguisFusubacterium nucleatum

    .

    . (10 20mg/

    mL)s. sanguis (p