Moving the Metrics that Matter. 3 Case Studies: All Facebook Conference, London
description
Transcript of Moving the Metrics that Matter. 3 Case Studies: All Facebook Conference, London
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Measure and move the metrics that matter
All Facebook Marke8ng Conference November 2012 -‐ @KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
About TBG Digital
1st FacebookAds API
Partner to Market
105 Social Media
Specialists
24/7 Support and
coverage
195 Billion
impressions served
685 Million clicks delivered
Global clients
66 Million apps
installed
21 245 Countries Million
fans
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
One Specialist Solu8on
1. Strategy Define the business objec8ves & the metrics that maOer
2. Creative
Engage and connect in the right kind of way
3. Media
Reach and recruit the right kind of connec8ons
4. Insights Learn from con8nually measuring the metrics that maOer
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
A Sea of Metrics
@Mentions
Shares
Seen by Comments
Views Retweets Fans
Followers
Unfortunately, they’re not “budget clinchers”
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Metrics that maOer
Awareness Preference Sales Consumption Advocacy
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Preference
Brand Preference
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Preference
[Brand x] wanted understand what its Facebook ac8vity brings to the company in terms of brand preference, awareness and
customer value
What’s the story?
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital 10,462 responses were received within just 24 Hours!
Generated 11,665 non-‐branded, online beer surveys amongst Facebook users in Brazil, US, Vietnam, Spain, Poland and Netherlands
What did we do?
33% fans
33% non fans
33% friends of fans
Brand Preference
© 2012 TBG Digital
64%
of [brand x] fans recommend
[brand x] to a friend (compared to 22% of non-fans)
Preference
What were the results?
59% of [brand x] fans drink beer
more than twice a week
17% of [brand x] fans prefer [brand x] over the main
competitor in each market
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Advocacy
Brand Advocacy
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital
The largest cable operator and home Internet provider in the US wanted to measure the advocacy surrounding their products…
….and if Facebook Fans had a higher level of
advocacy
Advocacy
What’s the story?
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital
Advocacy
We used “Social NPS” to measure brand advocacy collec8ng responses within the Facebook environment Responses were collected from four customer subgroups: fans, non-‐fans, male and female Users shared their likelihood to recommend by scoring low to high, 0 and 10.
What did we do?
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital
20 points higher Social NPS
for fans compared to non-fans
Advocacy
What were the results?
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital
Fans had a higher subscription value
Taking more products
This became even more interesting when reviewing by “Interest”
Advocacy
What were the results?
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Sales
Measuring sales for a fashion retailer while recruiting fans
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital
A mul8na8onal fashion retailer wanted to acquire
Facebook Fans to enhance it’s market posi8on in the US…
…then measure if this Facebook ac8vity affected sales
It was scep8cal…to say the least
Sales
What’s the story?
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital
Sales
What did we do? Ran a targeted Facebook fan acquisi8on campaign and acquired >400,000 new US fans in 42 days Even though this was a pure fan acquisi8on programme, we wanted to determine the real value these provided to the business…. …so we took a deeper look
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital May 1, 2011
May 11, 2011
May 21, 2011
May 31, 2011
Jun 10, 2011
Jun 20, 2011
Jun 30, 2011
Jul 10, 2011
Jul 20, 2011
Jul 30, 2011
Aug 9, 2011
Aug 19, 2011
Aug 29, 2011
Sep 8, 2011
Sep 18, 2011
Sep 28, 2011
Oct 8, 2011
Oct 18, 2011
Oct 28, 2011
Nov 7, 2011
Nov 17, 2011
Nov 27, 2011
Dec 7, 201
1 De
c 17
, 201
1 De
c 27
, 201
1 Jan 6, 2012
Jan 16, 2012
Jan 26, 2012
Feb 5, 2012
Feb 15, 2012
Feb 25, 2012
Mar 6, 2012
Mar 16, 2012
Mar 26, 2012
Apr 5
, 2012
Apr 1
5, 2012
Apr 2
5, 2012
May 5, 2012
May 15, 2012
May 25, 2012
Jun 4, 2012
Jun 14, 2012
Jun 24, 2012
Jul 4, 2012
Jul 14, 2012
Jul 24, 2012
Aug 3, 2012
Aug 13, 2012
Aug 23, 2012
Sep 2, 2012
Sep 12, 2012
Sep 22, 2012
Oct 2, 2012
Orders
May 1,
May 11,
May 21,
May 31,
Jun 10,
Jun 20,
Jun 30,
Jul 10,
Jul 20,
Jul 30,
Aug 9,
Aug 19,
Aug 29,
Sep 8,
Sep 18,
Sep 28,
Oct 8,
Oct 18,
Oct 28,
Nov 7,
Nov 17,
Nov 27,
Dec 7,
Dec 17
, De
c 27
, Jan 6,
Jan 16,
Jan 26,
Feb 5,
Feb 15,
Feb 25,
Mar 6,
Mar 16,
Mar 26,
Apr 5
, Ap
r 15,
Apr 2
5,
May 5,
May 15,
May 25,
Jun 4,
Jun 14,
Jun 24,
Jul 4,
Jul 14,
Jul 24,
Aug 3,
Aug 13,
Aug 23,
Sep 2,
Sep 12,
Sep 22,
Oct 2,
Visits Revenue
© 2012 TBG Digital
Sales
We went deeper s8ll…
…to correlate other marke8ng ac8vi8es to determine the
different influencing factors
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Company presence Fan Acquisi8on Hot Spots Partner retailer presence
What drove fans?
© 2012 TBG Digital
Sales
And we discovered that sales increased in the fan acquisi8on hot spots
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Aug 1, 2012
Aug 4, 2012
Aug 7, 2012
Aug 10, 2012
Aug 13, 2012
Aug 16, 2012
Aug 19, 2012
Aug 22, 2012
Aug 25, 2012
Aug 28, 2012
Aug 31, 2012
Sep 3, 2012
Sep 6, 2012
Sep 9, 2012
Sep 12, 2012
Sep 15, 2012
Sep 18, 2012
Sep 21, 2012
Sep 24, 2012
Sep 27, 2012
Sep 30, 2012
Oct 3, 2012
Oct 6, 2012
Oct 9, 2012
Oct 12, 2012
Oct 15, 2012
Oct 18, 2012
Oct 21, 2012
Order Volume by region
California: Fan acquisi8on -‐ High Store -‐ Yes New York: Fan acquisi8on -‐ High Store -‐ Yes Illinois: Fan acquisi8on -‐ Low Store -‐ Yes Texas: Fan acquisi8on -‐ Low Store -‐ Yes
FB ac8vity starts
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Fans drove sales May 1, -‐ M
ay 7,
May 8, -‐ M
ay 14,
May 15, -‐ M
ay 21,
May 22, -‐ M
ay 28,
May 29, -‐ Jun
4,
Jun 5, -‐ Jun
11,
Jun 12, -‐ Jun 18,
Jun 19, -‐ Jun 25,
Jun 26, -‐ Jul 2,
Jul 3, -‐ Jul 9,
Jul 10, -‐ Jul 16,
Jul 17, -‐ Jul 23,
Jul 24, -‐ Jul 30,
Jul 31, -‐ A
ug 6,
Aug 7, -‐ A
ug 13,
Aug 14, -‐ Au
g 20,
Aug 21, -‐ Au
g 27,
Aug 28, -‐ Sep 3,
Sep 4, -‐ Sep
10,
Sep 11, -‐ Sep 17,
Sep 18, -‐ Sep 24,
Sep 25, -‐ Oct 1,
Oct 2, -‐ Oct 8,
Oct 9, -‐ Oct 15,
Oct 16, -‐ O
ct 22,
Oct 23, -‐ O
ct 29,
Oct 30, -‐ N
ov 5,
Nov 6, -‐ Nov 12,
Nov 13, -‐ N
ov 19,
Nov 20, -‐ N
ov 26,
Nov 27, -‐ D
ec 3,
Dec 4, -‐ D
ec 10,
Dec 11
, -‐ De
c 17
,
Dec 18
, -‐ De
c 24
,
Dec 25
, -‐ De
c 31
,
Jan 1, -‐ Jan 7,
Jan 8, -‐ Jan 14,
Jan 15, -‐ Ja
n 21,
Jan 22, -‐ Ja
n 28,
Jan 29, -‐ Feb
4,
Feb 5, -‐ Feb 11,
Feb 12, -‐ Feb
18,
Feb 19, -‐ Feb
25,
Feb 26, -‐ M
ar 3,
Mar 4, -‐ M
ar 10,
Mar 11, -‐ Mar 17,
Mar 18, -‐ Mar 24,
Mar 25, -‐ Mar 31,
Apr 1
, -‐ Apr 7,
Apr 8
, -‐ Apr 14,
Apr 1
5, -‐ Ap
r 21,
Apr 2
2, -‐ Ap
r 28,
California + Orders 2011 New York + Orders 2011 California + Orders 2012 New York + Orders 2012
2011
2012
© 2012 TBG Digital
Sales
What were the results? 72% more
orders
44% more
Revenue
Case period 29th Aug to 16th Oct 2011 & 2012
if compared with the same period last year when there was no live Facebook ac8vity
@KarlHavard
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Intelligent media targeted at the high value consumer
segments: Quanity and quality in balance
Award winning creaQve across social media; which enhances the effecQveness of other markeQng
Social Media Planning & Buying
Crea8ve
Insights & Strategy
Smart Social that scales
Your Social Purpose
Brand & Consumer engagement based upon key insights and measuring the
metrics that maVer
© 2012 TBG Digital © 2012 TBG Digital
Thank you
Karl Havard (@KarlHavard) Client Strategy Director TBG Digital http://tbgdigital.com