Gnocchi Profiling v2

Gnocchi Numbers

(more) Benchmarking 2.1.x

Test Configuration

- 4 physical hosts- CentOS 7.2.1511- 24 physical cores (hyperthreaded), 256 GB memory- 25 - 1TB disks, 10K RPM- 1Gb network

- PostgreSQL 9.2.15 (single node)- Shared with ceph and compute service

Default everything, except 300 connections vs 100(default)

- Ceph 10.2.2 (4 nodes, 1 monitoring, 3 OSD)- 30 OSDs (1 TB disk), Journals share SSD, 2 replica, 2048 placement groups- OSD nodes shared with (idle) compute service

- Gnocchi Master (~ June 3rd, 2016)

Host Configuration

- Host1- OpenStack Controller Node (Ceilometer, Heat, Nova-stuff, Neutron, Cinder, Glance, Horizon)- Ceph Monitoring service- Gnocchi API

- Host2- OpenStack Compute Node- Ceph OSD node (10 OSDs)

- Host3- Ceph OSD node (10 OSDs)

- Host4- OpenStack Compute Node- Ceph OSD node (10 OSDs)- PostgreSQL

Testing Methodology

- Start 3 metricd services - 24 workers each- POST 1000 generic resources spread across 20 workers, 20 metrics each.

- POST Every 10 minutes- 1 minute granularity, 10 points/metric/request- 20 000 metrics, medium archive policy

- 1 min for a day, 1 hr for a week, 1 day for a year, 8 aggregates each

Batch1 metricd details

- POST time (50 posts) - avg=10.8s (-65.5%), stdev=0.79- Injection time - ~ 144 seconds- Stats

- Per metric injection - avg=0.462s, min=0.235s, max=1.693s, stdev=0.174- Average IO time - ~66% of _add_measures()- Overhead - ~10.8% (~9.89% minus all IO once metric locked)

- Comparison to 20OSD w/ shared journal- POST - 65.5% quicker- Injection time - 27% quicker


- POST time (50 posts) - avg=30.6s, stdev=2.72- Injection time - ~ 400 seconds- Stats

- Per metric injection - avg=1.316s, min=0.286s, max=5.758s, stdev=0.844- Average IO time - ~76.0% of _add_measures()- Overhead - ~9.23% (~6.78% minus all IO once metric locked)

- Comparison to 20OSD w/ shared journal- POST - 70% quicker- Injection time - 28.4% quicker


- POST time (50 posts) - avg=30.2s, stdev=2.87- Injection time - ~ 408 seconds- Stats

- Per metric injection - avg=1.33s, min=0.285s, max=5.647s, stdev=0.824- Average IO time - ~74.9% of _add_measures()- Overhead - ~9.58% (~6.95% minus all IO once metric locked)

- Comparison to 20OSD w/ shared journal- POST - 65.4% quicker- Injection time - 26% quicker

Metric Processing Rate

Job Distribution

Gnocchi Contention

Estimated 37% wasted on no op*

Estimated 13% wasted on no op*

* based on assumption each contention wastes 1.6ms

Ceph Profile

Ceph Profile

- Read speed- avg = 6727 kB/s (+32%)

- max = 28293 kB/s (+47%)

- stdev = 4185 (+69%)

- Write speed- avg = 1565 kB/s (+36%)

- max = 8655 kB/s (+94%)

- stdev = 1262 (+65%)

- Operations- avg = 8349 op/s (+36%)

- max = 31791 op/s (+62%)

- stdev = 5289 (+77%)

Difference compared to 20OSD, non-SSD deployment

Tuning Ceph

Hardware Configurations

- Ceph 10.2.2- 30 OSDs (1 TB disk), Journals share SSD, 2 replica, 2048 placement groups- OSD nodes shared with (idle) compute service

- Network File System- 8 - 1TB 10K HDD, RAID0- Separate host from metricd services

Ceph Hardware - Processing Rate

Ceph Test Configurations‘Default’ (30OSD+JOURNAL SSD)[osd]osd journal size = 10000osd pool default size = 3osd pool default min size = 2osd crush chooseleaf type = 1

8 Threads[osd]osd journal size = 10000osd pool default size = 3osd pool default min size = 2osd crush chooseleaf type = 1osd op threads = 8filestore op threads = 8journal max write entries = 50000journal queue max ops = 50000



36 + fs queue[osd]osd journal size = 10000osd pool default size = 3osd pool default min size = 2osd crush chooseleaf type = 1osd op threads = 36filestore op threads = 36filestore queue max ops = 50000filestore queue committing max ops = 50000journal max write entries = 50000journal queue max ops = 50000

Ceph Configurations - Metrics processed per 5s

Ceph Configurations - Processing Rate

Tuned vs Untuned

- Comparing Batch3 (36 + fs queue) vs Batch3 (default)- POST time (50 posts) - avg=21.1s (-30.1%), stdev=0.904 (-68.5%)- Injection time - ~ 199 seconds (-51.2%)- Stats

- Per metric injection- avg=0.596s(-55.2%)- stdev=0.477(-42.1%)- min=0.286s(+0%)- max=9.12s (+38%)

- Overhead - ~15.2% (~14.1% minus all IO once metric locked)

- Consistent write performance between batches!

Ceph Profile

- Read speed- avg = 10978 kB/s (+63%)

- max = 27104 kB/s (-4%)

- stdev = 5230 (+25%)

- Write speed- avg = 2521 kB/s (+61%)

- max = 5304 kB/s (-39%)

- stdev = 994(-21%)

- Operations- avg = 13534 op/s (+62%)

- max = 30398 op/s (-4%)

- stdev = 5739(+9%)

Difference compared to default 30OSD+SSD journal configuration using standard Ceph configurations

Gnocchi Design Tuning

Optimisation Opportunities

- Gnocchi has a lot of IO- By default, over 25 reads and 25 writes for every single metric- Serialising and deserialising each time

- Degradation as number of points grows (up to object split size)- Needs to read in full object with related points, update, and write full object for each aggregate

even if updating one point out of thousands.

Current Serialisation

Simpler serialisation merged into master and backported to 2.1

Effects of IO

Serialisation Format

Existing

{‘values’:{<timestamp>: float,

<timestamp>: float,

...

<timestamp>: float}}

- ~18B/point or ~10B/point (compressed)- Not appendable- Msgpack serialisation, super fast

Proposed

delimiter+float+delimiter+float+.

..+delimiter+float

- 9B/point (or much if compressed)- Appendable- Delimiter can be used to describe subsequent

bytes- Timestamp computed by offset

- eg. Position 9 to 17 is data x seconds from start

- Zero padding required if first point not start of split- Handles compression much better

Comparing Serialisation Formats

Existing deserialisation needs to be sorted. It is more comparable if factored in.

Looking to 3.x

- Testing larger datasets (a few thousand points/metric)- Benchmarking new proposed format- Study effects of alternative storage solutions

- Try to add in support for intermediary storage in memory

Gnocchi Profiling v2

Technology

Transcript of Gnocchi Profiling v2