Download - 89020070105

Transcript
  • 8/11/2019 89020070105

    1/5

    Archive

    ofSID

    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, VOL. 6, NO. 1, WINTER-SPRING 2007

    1682-0053/07$10 2007 JD

    31

    AbstractThis paper presents a new, efficient and robust

    three-phase load flow for unbalanced distribution systems.

    The proposed method uses equivalent current injections,

    based on Newton-Raphson method. The load flow issue is

    considered as an optimization problem and is decoupled into

    two subproblems without using any assumptions. The

    Jacobian matrix is set to be constant, thus, the method is fast,

    robust and efficient. The proposed method has been tested on

    the IEEE 13 Bus Radial Distribution Test Feeder with

    satisfactory results.

    Index TermsThree-Phase load flow, unbalanced

    distribution networks, fast decoupled load flow.

    NOMENCLATURE

    The three phases, neutral and ground are referred to with

    the superscript ,n,c,b,a and g,respectively.

    x The subscript x denotes the nodes of three phase

    system

    y The subscript y denotes the nodes of three phase

    system

    r The superscript rdenotes the real parts

    i The superscript i denotes the imaginary partsag

    xV Voltage of phase a , at node x with respect to

    groundaxyI Current flowing through phase a , between nodes

    x and y aa

    xyZ Self-impedances between nodes x and y in

    phase a ab

    xyZ Mutual-impedance between phases a and b between nodes x and y

    abc

    xV Voltage of phases a , b , and c at node x with

    respect to groundabc

    xyI Current flowing through phases a , b , and c

    between nodes x and y

    ECI Equivalent current injectiona

    eqsp,k

    I Specified ECI of phase a, at k-th bus][n,a

    eqsp,kI Specified ECI of phase a, at k-th bus and at

    n -th iterationspa

    kS )( Complex power load at phase a at k-th busspa

    kP )( Real power load at phase a at k-th busspa

    kQ )( Reactive power load at phase a at k-th busa

    kP0 Real multicipants of the total load at phase a , at

    k-th busakQ 0 Reactive multicipants of the total load at phase a,

    at k-th bus

    1A Proportion of constant power component of theactive load

    Manuscript received March 15, 2006; revised August 9, 2006.

    The authors are with the Electrical Engineering Department, TarbiatModares University, Tehran, Iran (e-mail: [email protected],

    [email protected]).Publisher Item Identifier S 1682-0053(07)0478

    1R Proportion of constant power component of the

    reactive load

    2A Proportion of constant current component of the

    active load

    2R Proportion of constant current component of the

    reactive load

    3A Proportion of constant impedance component of

    the active load

    3R Proportion of constant impedance component of

    the reactive loadabc

    cal,kI The calculated three-phase current at k -th bus.

    abckI The mismatch three-phase current at k -th bus.abce Real parts of voltage of phases a , b , and c abcf Imaginary parts of voltage of phases a , b ,

    and c r,abcI Real parts of ECI mismatches of phases a , b ,

    and c i,abcI Imaginary parts of ECI mismatches of phases a ,

    b , and c abcabc f,e Vector of corrections of bus voltages of

    phases a , b , and c , ,/ /abc r abc abc i abc abcI e I f G = = Submatrix of the

    Jacobian matrix, ,

    / /

    abc i abc abc r abc abc

    I e I f B = = Submatrix of theJacobian matrixabcabcabc

    bus B,G,Y Three phase admittance matrix, real

    and imaginary parts of three phase admittance

    matrix, respectively

    I. INTRODUCTION

    HE ANALYSIS of power distribution systems is an

    important area of research activities due to the vital

    role of distribution systems as the final link between the

    bulk power system and consumers. Load flow is an

    important tool for the analysis of distribution systems. This

    tool must be able to model the special features ofdistribution systems such as unbalanced loads,

    untransposed lines, radial and weakly meshed topology,

    grounded or ungrounded systems, high resistance to

    reactance(R/X) ratios, and single, two or three phase lines.

    Due to the high R/X ratios and unbalanced operation in

    distribution systems, the Newton-Raphson and ordinary

    Fast Decoupled Load Flow method may provide inaccurate

    results and may not be converged. Therefore, conventional

    load flow methods cannot be directly applied to distribution

    systems. In many cases, the radial distribution systems

    include untransposed lines which are unbalanced because

    of single phase, two phase and three phase loads. Thus,

    load flow analysis of balanced radial distribution systems[1], [2] will be inefficient to solve the unbalanced cases and

    the distribution systems need to be analyzed on a three-

    phase basis instead of single phase basis.

    Three-Phase Fast Decoupled Load Flow for

    Unbalanced Distribution SystemsA. R. Hatami and M. Parsa Moghaddam

    T

    www.SID.ir

  • 8/11/2019 89020070105

    2/5

    Archive

    ofSID

    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, VOL. 6, NO. 1, WINTER-SPRING 200732

    There have been a lot of interests in the area of three-

    phase distribution load flows. A fast decoupled power flow

    method has been proposed in [3]. This method orders the

    laterals instead of buses into layers, thus reducing the

    problem size to the number of laterals. Using of lateral

    variables instead of node variables makes this method more

    efficient for a given system topology, but it may add some

    difficulties if the network topology is changed regularly,

    which is common in distribution systems because of

    switching operations. In [4], a method for solving

    unbalanced radial distribution systems based on the

    Newton-Raphson method has been proposed. Thukaram et

    al. [5] have proposed a method for solving three-phase

    radial distribution networks. This method uses the forward

    and backward propagation to calculate branch currents and

    node voltages. A three-phase fast decoupled power flow

    method has been proposed in [6]. This method uses

    traditional Newton-Raphson algorithm in a rectangular

    coordinate system. In [7], a method for the solution of

    unbalanced three-phase power systems using the Newton-

    Raphson has been proposed in which, three-phase currentinjection equations are written in rectangular coordinate

    system. However, these methods are very cumbersome and

    need large computational time.

    A fast decoupled G-matrix method for power flow,

    based on equivalent current injections, has been proposed

    in [8] .This method uses a constant Jacobian matrix which

    needs to be inverted only once. However, the Jacobian

    matrix is formed by omitting the reactance of the

    distribution lines with the assumption that R>>X; and fails

    if X>R. In [9], a method has been suggested for three-

    phase power flow analysis in distribution networks by

    combining the implicit Z-bus method [10] and the Gauss-Seidel method. This method uses fractional factorization of

    Y-bus matrix. Thus, large computational time is necessary

    for this method. Ranjan et al. [11] have proposed a method

    for load flow solution of unbalanced radial distribution

    network. This method uses basic principles of circuit

    theory and solves a simple algebraic recursive expression

    of voltage magnitude. However, the power loss of the lines

    must be calculated in each iteration and therefore needs

    large computational time.

    In this paper, the method proposed in [2] for balanced

    distribution system is developed for threephase

    unbalanced distribution systems. Furthermore, in the

    proposed method any type of loads can be modeled easilyin the problem formulation. The proposed method is based

    on equivalent current injections (ECI) and uses Newton-

    Raphson technique in rectangular coordinates. Here, the

    load flow is considered as an optimization problem and is

    decoupled into two subproblems without using any

    assumptions such as voltage magnitude and R/X ratios.

    II.MODELING OF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM COMPONENTS

    A.Line Model

    Most of the distribution systems are of unbalanced

    operational feature and include untransposed lines.Therefore, it is necessary to introduce an accurate method

    for calculating the line impedance. Line modeling of three-

    phase unbalanced distribution system has been discussed in

    Fig. 1. Three-Phase line section model.

    [11]. A general form of three-phase feeder line section is

    shown in Fig. 1. The line constants could be obtained by

    the method developed by Carson and Lewis [12]. The

    voltage equations, can be written as

    ag aa ab ac aag V z z z I V y xy xy xy xyx

    bg bg ba bb bc bV V z z z I x y xy xy xy xycg c

    cg ca cb ccV IVx xyz z zy xy xy xy

    =

    (1)

    Or in a compact form as

    [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]abc abc abc abcV V Z I x y xy xy = (2)

    The, three-phase current is then obtained by

    [ ] [ ] ([ ] [ ])abc abc abc abcI Y V Vxy xy x y= (3)

    B.Load Models

    In this paper, the loads are considered to be three-phase

    (balanced or unbalanced) or single-phase. Three-phase

    loads can be connected in wye or delta forms whilesingle-phase loads can be connected as line-to-ground or

    line-to-line fashions. All loads can be modeled as a

    combination of constant power, constant impedance or

    constant current loads.

    C.Power Equipments

    Other equipments could be modeled in phase quantities

    with or without mutual coupling. Details of three-phase

    modeling of distribution system components are given in

    [12].

    III. THE ECI-BASEDNRALGORITHM

    The ECI-based technique uses current instead of power

    for modeling formulation. For load buses the specified

    constant power, constant impedance or constant current can

    be converted into specified equivalent current injection

    (Isp-eq). For example, for a three-phase star connected load

    model, which is shown in Fig. 2, the k-th bus specified ECI

    at the n-th iteration is determined by

    ,[ ] ,[ ] ,[ ] ,[ ]

    , - , - , - , -[ ] [ ]Tabc n a n b n c n

    k sp eq k sp eq k sp eq k sp eqI I I I= (4)

    ,[ ] * *

    , - ,[ ] ,[ ]

    ( ) ( )( ) ( )

    a sp a a sp

    a n k k k

    k sp eq a n a n

    k k

    S P QI

    V V

    += = (5)

    Where

    2,[ ] ,[ ]

    0 1 2 3( ) ( )a sp a a n a n

    k k k k P P A A V A V= + + (6)

    www.SID.ir

  • 8/11/2019 89020070105

    3/5

    Archive

    ofSID

    HATAMI AND PARSA MOGHADDAM: THREE-PHASE FAST DECOUPLED LOAD FLOW FOR UNBALANCED 33

    Fig. 2. A three-phase wye connected load.

    2,[ ] ,[ ]

    0 1 2 3( ) ( )a sp a a n a n

    k k k k Q Q R R V R V = + + (7)

    1 2 3

    1 2 3

    1

    1

    A A A

    R R R

    + + =

    + + = (8)

    The calculated current at k-th bus,,

    ab c

    k c a l I , is given by

    , 0[ ] [ ] [ ]abc abc abc

    k cal k km

    m l

    I I I

    = + (9)

    where,00

    [ ] [ ] [ ]k

    abc abc abc

    k kI Y V= = current drawn by the shunt

    admittance,0

    abc

    kY , connected between k-th bus and neutral

    and [ ] [ ] ([ ] [ ])km

    abc abc abc abc

    km k mI Y V V= , m= set of incident

    lines at k-th bus.

    Now let the mismatch current be defined as,

    , , -[ ] [ ] [ ]abc abc abc

    k k cal k sp eqI I I = (10)

    The above mismatch current function can be rewritten as

    , ,

    ,

    , , ,

    abc r abc r

    abc r abcabc abc

    abc i abcabc i abc i

    abc abc

    I II ee f

    I fI I

    e f

    =

    (11)

    where

    , ,[ ] [ ] [ ]abc abc r abc iI I j I= + (12)

    and

    [ ] [ ] [ ]abc abc abcV e j f = + (13)

    Now if the three-phase admittance be defined as

    [ ] [ ] [ ]abc abc abcbus

    Y G j B= + (14)

    Then, the mismatch current can be determined by the

    following equation

    ,

    ,

    -abc r abc abc abc

    abc i abc abc abc

    I G B e

    I B G f

    =

    (15)

    IV. PROPOSED METHOD

    The load flow problem proposed here is considered as an

    optimization problem in which, the main objective is to

    minimize the sum of squares of specified values of ECI

    from their calculated values. The problem is formulated as

    - -

    - -

    ( )

    Tr r

    abc abc abc abc

    sp eq cal sp eq cal

    i iabc abc abc abc

    sp eq cal sp eq cal

    I I I IMin

    I I I I

    =

    (16)

    Data in ut

    Voltage initialization

    Form ][Band][Gabcabc

    Use equation (20) to compute

    [H] and then invert it

    Use equations (9), (10), (15) to

    calculateiabc,rabc, IandI

    Use equations (22) and (23) to

    calculateiabc,

    mod

    rabc,

    mod IandI

    Solve equations (19) and (20) for

    ]f[and]e[ abcabc

    Update the voltages

    ]f[]f[][f

    ]e[]e[][e

    abcabcabc

    abcabcabc

    +=

    +=

    abcabc f,e

    Sto

    Yes

    No

    Fig. 3. Flowchart of the proposed method.

    The optimal voltage corrections which minimizes the

    function can be written as

    1

    0

    0

    ,

    ,

    abce abcT abc abcT abc

    G G B B

    abc T abc abc T abcabc G G B B

    f

    abc rI

    abcT abc T G B

    abcT abc TB G abc iI

    +

    +

    =

    (17)

    or

    1 ,

    mod

    ,

    mod

    0

    0

    abc rabc

    abc iabc

    H Ie

    H If

    =

    (18)

    This equation can be decoupled into two equations

    representing active and reactive loops as follows

    -1 ,

    mod[ ] [ ] [ ]abc abc r e H I = (19)

    -1 ,

    mod[ ] [ ] [ ]abc abc if H I = (20)

    where[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]abc T abc abc T abcH G G B B= + (21)

    The real and imaginary components of the mismatch

    current are represented by the following equations

    www.SID.ir

  • 8/11/2019 89020070105

    4/5

    Archive

    ofSID

    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, VOL. 6, NO. 1, WINTER-SPRING 200734

    TABLE I

    RESULTS OF THE PROPOSED METHOD AND COMPARISON WITH THE ACTUAL VALUES OF IEEE13BUS DISTRIBUTION FEEDER

    , , ,

    mod[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]abc r abc T abc r abc T abc iI G I B I = + (22)

    and, , ,

    mod[ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ]abc i abc T abc i abc T abc r I G I B I = (23)

    Equations (19) and (20) are solved iteratively until the

    convergence is obtained. In the above equations, H is a

    constant matrix and is inverted only once. Since the load

    flow problem is decoupled into two sub problems without

    using any assumptions such as voltage magnitude and R/X

    ratios therefore, the proposed method is a robust, efficient

    and computationally fast. The flowchart of the proposed

    algorithm is shown in Fig. 3.

    V.CASE STUDY

    In this paper, the standard IEEE 13 Bus Radial

    Distribution Test Feeder is used to evaluate the

    performance of the proposed load flow algorithm. The

    standard IEEE 13 Bus Radial Distribution Test Feeder,

    which is shown in Fig. 4, was developed by the IEEE

    Distribution System Analysis Subcommittee to have a

    common set of valid data to verify solutions of developed

    programs [13]. In this system, there is one substation

    voltage regulator consisting of three single-phase units

    connected in wye fashion. Voltage regulators are assumedto be step-type and can be connected in the substation

    and/or to a specified line segment. In this study the effect

    of voltage regulator is not considered. The per unit voltage

    magnitudes and phase angles of the buses are shown in

    Table I. Dashes (-) indicate that a phase is not present at

    that bus. The percentage error is calculated using (24),

    where the calculated values are the results of the proposed

    load flow algorithm and the actual values are from [13]. As

    it can be seen in Table I, maximum error percentage is

    about 1%. Therefore, the proposed load flow algorithm

    gives accurate results and is a valid and efficient three-

    phase load flow for unbalanced distribution systems.

    100valueactual

    valuecalcualted-valueactualerrorpercentage = (24)

    Node Actual Voltage Values Calculated Voltage Values

    Bus Mag.(pu)Phase

    Angle(Degree)Mag.(pu)

    PhaseAngle(Degree)

    Percentage

    Error

    a 1.0000 0.00 1.0000 0.00 0

    b 1.0000 -120 1.0000 -120 0650

    c 1.0000 120 1.0000 120 0

    a 1.0625 0.00 1.0625 0.00 0

    b 1.0500 -120.00 1.0500 -120.00 0RG60c 1.0687 120.00 1.0687 120.00 0

    a 1.0210 -2.49 1.0290 -2.50 0.78

    b 1.0420 -121.72 1.0480 -121.9 0.56632

    c 1.0174 117.83 1.0190 118.5 0.15

    a 1.0180 -2.56 1.020 -3.0 0.2

    b 1.0401 -121.77 1.045 -122.0 0.47633

    c 1.0148 117.82 1.015 118.10 0.02

    a 0.9940 -3.23 0.9960 -3.90 0.2

    b 1.0218 -122.22 1.0290 -122.5 0.70634

    c 0.9960 117.34 0.9980 118 0.2

    a ----

    b 1.0329 -121.90 1.039 -121.00 0.6645

    c 1.0155 117.86 1.014 118.00 0.15

    a ----

    b 1.0311 -121.98 1.035 -122.00 0.38646c 1.0134 117.90 1.013 117.5 0.03

    a 0.9900 -5.30 0.9950 -5.8 0.50

    b 1.0529 -122.34 1.045 -122.00 0.75671

    c 0.9778 116.02 0.9765 116.50 0.13

    a 0.9900 -5.30 0.985 -5.00 0.50

    b 1.0529 -122.34 1.043 -122.00 0.94680

    c 0.9778 116.02 0.9740 115 0.39

    a 0.9881 -5.32 0.9822 -5.2 0.60

    b -----684

    c 0.9758 115.92 0.9720 114.5 0.39

    a ----

    b ----611

    c 0.9738 115.78 0.9700 114.9 0.39

    a 0.9825 -5.25 0.9800 -5.3 0.25

    b ----652c -----

    a 0.9900 -5.31 0.9950 -5.8 0.50

    b 1.0529 -122.34 1.045 -122.00 0.75692

    c 0.9777 116.02 0.9765 116.50 0.13

    a 0.9835 -5.56 0.9800 -5.2 0.035

    b 1.0553 -122.34 1.046 -122.2 0.88675

    c 0.9758 116.03 0.9700 115 0.60

    www.SID.ir

  • 8/11/2019 89020070105

    5/5

    Archive

    ofSID

    HATAMI AND PARSA MOGHADDAM: THREE-PHASE FAST DECOUPLED LOAD FLOW FOR UNBALANCED 35

    Fig. 4. IEEE 13 Bus radial distribution test feeder.

    VI. CONCLUSION

    A new, three-phase load flow for unbalanced distribution

    systems has been presented in this paper. The load flowproblem is considered as an optimization problem and is

    decoupled into two subproblems without using any

    assumptions. The method is capable of modeling different

    types of loads. Also, the algorithm is simple and uses a

    constant Jacobian matrix. Therefore, the proposed method

    is a fast, robust and efficient method. The load flow

    algorithm was tested on the standard IEEE 13 Bus Radial

    Distribution Test Feeder. The results confirm the validity

    of the method.

    REFERENCES

    [1]

    D. Das, P. Kothari, and A. Kalam, "Simple and efficient method forload flow solution of radial distribution systems," Electrical Powerand Energy Systems, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 335-346, Oct. 1995.

    [2] P. Aravindhababu, "A new fast decoupled power flow method for

    distribution systems," Electric Power Components and Systems,vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 869-878, Sept. 2003.

    [3] R. D. Zimmerman and H. D. Chiang, "Fast decoupled power flow for

    unbalanced radial distribution systems," IEEE-PES Winter Meeting,paper no. 95, New York, 1995.

    [4] S. K. Goswami and S. K. Basu, "Direct solution of distributionsystems,"IEE Proc., pt. C, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 78-88, 1999.

    [5] D. Thukaram, H. M. Wijekoon Banda, and J. Jerome, "A Robustthree phase power flow algorithm for radial distribution systems,"

    Electric Power System Research, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 227-236,Jun. 1999.

    [6] W. M. Lin, Y. S. Su, H. C. Chin, and J. H. Teng, "Three-Phase

    unbalanced distribution power flow solutions with minimum datapreparation," IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 14, no. 3,

    pp. 1178-1183, Aug. 1999.

    [7]

    P. A. N. Garcia, J. L. R. Pereira, S. Carnerio, V. M. da Costa, andN. Martins, "Three-Phase power flow calculations using the current

    injection method," IEEE Trans. on Power Systems ,vol. 15, no. 2,pp. 508-514, May 2000.

    [8] W. M. Lin and J. H. Teng, "Three-Phase distribution networks fastdecoupled power flow solutions," Electric Power and Energy

    Systems, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 375-380, Jun. 2000.

    [9] J. H. Teng, "A Modified gauss-seidel algorithm of threephasepower flow analysis in distribution network," Electrical Power andEnergy Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 97-102, Feb. 2002.

    [10] T. H. Chen, M. S. Chen, K. J. Hwang, P. Kotas, and E. A. Chebli,"Distribution system power flow analysis-a rigid approach," IEEETrans. on Power Delivery, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1146-1153, Jul. 1991.

    [11] R. Ranjan, B. Venkatesh, A. Chaturvedi, and D. Das, "Power flow

    solution of three-phase unbalanced radial distribution network,"Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 421-433, Apr. 2004.

    [12] W. H. Kersting, Distribution System Modeling and Analysis, CRCPress, 2002.

    [13] IEEE Distribution System Analysis Subcommittee, "Radialdistribution test feeders," IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, vol. 6,no. 3, pp. 975-985, Aug. 1991.

    A. R. Hatami received the B.Sc. degree in electrical engineering fromAmirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, in 1995, and M.Sc.from Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran, in 1998.

    From 2000 to 2002 he was with Chabahar Maritime University,Chabahar, Iran, and since 2002, he has been with Bu Ali Sina University,

    Hamedan, Iran, as a lecturer. He is currently a Ph.D. student in TarbiatModares University. His research interests include power distributionsystems, reliability and electricity market.

    M. Parsa Moghaddamrecived his B.Sc. degree in Electrical Engineeringfrom Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, in 1980, M.Sc. degreefrom Toyohashi University of Technology, Japan, in 1985; Ph.D. degree

    from Tohoku University, Japan, in 1988.Currently, he is an Assosiate Professor in the Department of Electrical

    Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. His researchinterests include power system planning and control, optimization, andrestructuring.

    www.SID.ir