Watson etal mscdong/papers/watson_2010_ecology.pdf · Title: Microsoft Word - Watson_etal_ms.doc...

20
1 1 2 3 4 Currents connecting communities: nearshore community similarity 5 and ocean circulation. 6 7 8 J.R. Watson 1, * , C.G. Hays 2 , P.T. Raimondi 3 , S. Mitarai 4 , C. Dong 5 , J.C. McWilliams 5 , C.A. 9 Blanchette 6 , J. E. Caselle 6 , D.A. Siegel 1,7 10 11 12 1 Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 13 93106, USA. 14 2 School of Natural Sciences, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, USA. 15 3 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA. 16 4 Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, 7542 Onna-son Onna, Okinawa 904-0411, Japan. 17 5 Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 18 6 Marine Sciences Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA. 19 7 Department of Geography, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA. 20 21 * Author for correspondence: [email protected] 22 23 Keywords: Marine biodiversity, marine community structure, larval dispersal, ocean circulation. 24 25

Transcript of Watson etal mscdong/papers/watson_2010_ecology.pdf · Title: Microsoft Word - Watson_etal_ms.doc...

  • 1

    1

    2

    3

    4

    Currents connecting communities: nearshore community similarity 5

    and ocean circulation. 6

    7

    8

    J.R. Watson 1, *, C.G. Hays2, P.T. Raimondi3, S. Mitarai4, C. Dong5, J.C. McWilliams5, C.A. 9

    Blanchette6, J. E. Caselle6, D.A. Siegel1,7 10

    11

    12 1 Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 13

    93106, USA. 14 2 School of Natural Sciences, University of California Merced, Merced, CA, USA. 15 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA. 16 4 Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, 7542 Onna-son Onna, Okinawa 904-0411, Japan. 17 5 Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. 18 6 Marine Sciences Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA. 19 7Department of Geography, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA. 20

    21 *Author for correspondence: [email protected] 22

    23

    Keywords: Marine biodiversity, marine community structure, larval dispersal, ocean circulation. 24

    25

  • 2

    Abstract 25

    Understanding the mechanisms that create spatial heterogeneity in species distributions is 26

    fundamental to ecology. For nearshore marine systems, most species have a pelagic larval stage 27

    where dispersal is strongly influenced by patterns of ocean circulation. Concomitantly, nearshore 28

    habitats and the local environment are also influenced by ocean circulation. Because of the 29

    shared dependence on the seascape, distinguishing the relative importance of the local 30

    environment from regional patterns of dispersal for community structure remains a challenge. 31

    Here, we quantify the oceanographic ‘distance’ and ‘asymmetry’ between nearshore sites using 32

    ocean circulation modeling results. These novel metrics quantify spatial separation based on 33

    realistic patterns of ocean circulation and we explore their explanatory power for intertidal and 34

    subtidal community similarity in the Southern California Bight. We find that these metrics show 35

    significant correspondence with patterns of community similarity and that their combined 36

    explanatory power exceeds that of the thermal structure of the domain. Our approach identifies 37

    the unique influence of ocean circulation on community structure and provides evidence for 38

    oceanographically mediated dispersal limitation in nearshore marine communities. 39

    40

    Introduction 41

    The decay of similarity with geographic distance has long been identified (Tobler, 1970), yet 42

    reasons why this relationship exists in ecological communities are still debated (Menge et al. 43

    1997, Nekola and White 1999, Cottenie 2005). Spatial patterns in biodiversity and community 44

    similarity reflect the influence of multiple processes broadly categorized as either niche-based, 45

    through species sorting and the effect of environmental gradients on individual species 46

    demography (Armstrong and McGehee 1980, Leibold 1995) or so-called neutral processes, 47

  • 3

    namely dispersal limitation (Hubbell 2001). In most ecological systems, because there is often 48

    strong correspondence between patterns of dispersal and environmental variables, quantifying the 49

    relative contribution of niche and neutral processes in determining community composition 50

    remains a challenge (Gilbert et al. 2004). Our aim is to identify the unique influence of dispersal 51

    on spatial patterns of community similarity for nearshore marine species in the Southern 52

    California Bight (SCB). In order to address this challenge, we have developed novel metrics of 53

    dispersal using ocean circulation models. 54

    55

    In benthic marine systems the role of dispersal in determining community dynamics, population 56

    demography and genetic structure has had a long and rich history (Hjort 1914, Gaines and 57

    Roughgarden 1985, Palumbi 2003, Alberto et al. 2010, White et al. 2010). As adults, many 58

    nearshore marine species are sedentary, with limited home ranges (e.g. < 10 km). It is primarily 59

    during their larval stage that they disperse further, potentially hundreds of kilometers (Kinlan and 60

    Gaines 2003, Watson et al. 2010). During this stage ocean currents play a vital role creating, at 61

    the same time, barriers to dispersal and highly connected regions (Baums et al. 2006; Cowen et al. 62

    2006). It is unknown whether this seascape structure exerts control on community similarity 63

    through dispersal limitation. Recently, Lagrangian particle simulations have been used to capture 64

    the spatial complexity of oceanographically mediated dispersal and have provided insight into the 65

    potential scales of population connectivity (e.g. Cowen et al. 2006, Mitarai et al. 2009) and in 66

    understanding the drivers of genetic structure (e.g. Galindo et al. 2006, Kool et al. 2009, White et 67

    al. 2010, Selkoe et al. 2010). Here, we use Lagrangian particle simulations to investigate the 68

    influence of ocean circulation on the community similarity of nearshore marine species in the 69

    SCB. 70

  • 4

    71

    The SCB is a region on the west coast of North America that stretches from Point Conception to 72

    the U.S. – Mexican border (Fig. 1a). It is characterized by the meeting of two major water masses 73

    at Point Conception – the relatively cool, offshore, equatorward flowing California Current and 74

    the warmer, near coastal, poleward flowing Southern California Counter Current (Fig. 1a). Spatial 75

    patterns in community similarity have been shown to correspond strongly with the thermal 76

    structure of the SCB (Blanchette et al. 2008), suggesting that species are adapted to this thermal 77

    gradient. However, because multiple mechanisms driving community structure are functions of 78

    ocean circulation, environmental variables such as temperature will correspond with patterns of 79

    oceanographically mediated dispersal. Hence, it remains an open question whether the thermal 80

    structure of the SCB is the primary force shaping community structure in the SCB. The goal of 81

    this work is to partition the statistical contribution of dispersal by ocean currents from that of the 82

    thermal structure of the SCB. In order to do so, we use simulations of Lagrangian water mass 83

    trajectories and develop novel metrics of dispersal based on the complex ocean circulation of the 84

    SCB. 85

    86

    Methods 87

    We analyzed spatial patterns in marine community composition (i.e. species identity and 88

    abundance) from two empirical sources: in 2004, subtidal rocky reef communities were surveyed 89

    using underwater visual census as part of the Cooperative Research Assessment of Nearshore 90

    Ecosystems program (CRANE 2004), and the intertidal communities were surveyed as part of the 91

    Community Biodiversity Survey conducted by the Partnership for the Interdisciplinary Study of 92

    Coastal Oceans, an ongoing project which started in 2001 (PISCO, Blanchette et al., 2008). Fifty-93

  • 5

    nine subtidal rocky reef sites and thirty-nine intertidal sites in the SCB were sampled, spanning 94

    the mainland and the Channel Islands (Fig. 1a). Here, we analyzed a total of 214 species (105 95

    subtidal and 109 intertidal species). The data were square root transformed to reduce the influence 96

    of highly abundant species and a community similarity matrix was calculated using the Bray-97

    Curtis similarity coefficient (Bray and Curtis 1957). 98

    99

    Lagrangian particle simulations were used to quantify the movement of water parcels, between 100

    nearshore regions. Approximately 400,000 passive Lagrangian particles were released in 135 101

    circular patches (5 km in radius), distributed uniformly throughout the nearshore of the SCB, over 102

    the period January 1, 1996 - December 31, 2002 (see Mitarai et al. 2009 for more information on 103

    the Lagrangian particle simulations). The size of these patches reflects limitations in the 104

    numerical simulations of Lagrangian particles. Lagrangian particles advect passively with 105

    velocity fields produced from a Regional Oceanic Modeling System (ROMS) solution to the SCB 106

    (Dong et al. 2009; Mitarai et al. 2009; see Fig. 1b). This solution is 3D with a horizontal spatial 107

    resolution of 1 km and 40 vertical levels. All eight islands in the Southern California Bight are 108

    resolved and the complex circulation of the SCB is well captured (see Dong et al. 2009 for further 109

    information on the hydrodynamic model). 110

    111

    Lagrangian particle transit times, between all pairs of nearshore sites, provide a quantification of 112

    spatial separation based on ocean currents (Mitarai et al, 2009, Fig. 1c) and describe patterns of 113

    larval dispersal. An important property of Lagrangian particle transit times is their inherent 114

    asymmetry, that is, Lagrangian particles traveling from patch A to B may have a different mean 115

    transit time than those particles traveling from B to A. Thus the first metric used here, termed the 116

  • 6

    oceanographic distance, is the average of the two-way Lagrangian transit times. The second 117

    metric is termed the oceanographic asymmetry and is defined as the absolute difference in the 118

    two-way Lagrangian particle transit times. Both oceanographic distances and asymmetries are 119

    measured in units of time (days). 120

    121

    The thermal environment of the empirical sampling sites was assessed using monthly sea surface 122

    temperatures from the Pathfinder 5 Advanced Very-High Resolution Radiometer (Kahru and 123

    Mitchell, 2002). Data at a spatial resolution of 4 km was averaged over the period 1997 – 2008. 124

    Spatially, values were then smoothed using a 2-dimensional, 5 km radius, Gaussian filter. These 125

    values were then linearly interpolated to the subtidal and intertidal sampling sites. Smoothing and 126

    interpolation created a better representation of the local sea surface temperatures than the nearest 127

    data point. The thermal structure between the empirical (community) sampling sites was then 128

    defined as the difference in SST (ΔSST). Unlike Lagrangian transit times, ΔSST is a symmetric 129

    quantity. 130

    131

    Univariate and multivariate linear models of community similarity were made using 132

    oceanographic distance, asymmetry and ΔSST as independent variables. The Mantel correlation 133

    statistic (r) and its permutation test of significance (p-value) were used to describe univariate 134

    relationships. In the multivariate case, multiple linear regression on distance matrices was used to 135

    explore the influence and interaction of independent variables (Legendre and Legendre 1998, 136

    Lichstein 2007). Further, multivariate models were created for different regions of the SCB: a full 137

    model (using all sampling sites) and a regional model (comparing island with mainland sites 138

    only). Standard regression coefficients and semi-partial correlation coefficients (Legendre and 139

  • 7

    Legendre 1998) were used to describe the multivariate models. Standard regression coefficients 140

    are produced using the z-score of the independent variables, which controls for differing units 141

    among terms and allows for direct comparisons of their influence; larger standard regression 142

    coefficients identify those independent variables with more influence. Confidence intervals on 143

    these values were estimated with a bootstrap procedure. Semi-partial correlation coefficients were 144

    used to quantify the relative contribution of each independent variable in a given model. These 145

    are determined as the reduction in R2 when a given independent variable is left out of a 146

    multivariate model. Values are reported as fractions of the original R2. For all models, the key 147

    assumptions of linear regression were met: (1) The distribution of community similarities was 148

    approximately normal (assessed with quantile-quantile plots), (2) community similarity and all 149

    independent variables correspond linearly and (3) collinearity among independent variables, 150

    quantified using the variance inflation factor, was negligible (all variance inflation factors were 151

    found to be less than five). 152

    153

    Results 154

    The univariate analysis revealed a significant, negative, linear relationship between community 155

    similarity and ΔSST for both the subtidal and intertidal communities (r = -0.59 and -0.25, p < 156

    0.01, Fig. 2a and b respectively). For both, variability in community similarity is largest at small 157

    mean differences in SST. This could simply be a result of fewer data points at greater SST 158

    differences or it may indicate the spatial scales over which ΔSST has explanatory power. For 159

    instance, ΔSST can explain differences in species composition at the extremes of the SCB, the 160

    very warm (~17oC) compared to the very cold (~12oC, Fig. 1a). However, in the center of the 161

    SCB, where the temperature gradient is less steep, there is less significance to ΔSST's explanatory 162

  • 8

    power. 163

    164

    Oceanographic distance shows a stronger, more significant, negative relationship with subtidal 165

    and intertidal community similarity (r = -0.73 and -0.38, p-values < 0.01, Fig. 2c and d 166

    respectively). This indicates that those local communities that are far apart, based on ocean 167

    circulation, are less similar than those closer together. Further, in contrast to ΔSST, the variability 168

    in the relationship between community structure and oceanographic distance is homogenous 169

    throughout the domain. The significance and strength of the relationship indicate that 170

    oceanographic distance is a better predictor of community similarity than ΔSST. Oceanographic 171

    asymmetry was found to have a negative relationship with subtidal community similarity (r = -172

    0.19, p < 0.01, Fig. 2e). Asymmetry did not produce a significant relationship with intertidal 173

    community similarity (r = 0.03, p > 0.01, Fig. 2f) and hence, from a univariate analysis, it is 174

    difficult to draw any conclusions as to the influence of asymmetry on community similarity. 175

    176

    Between all sampling sites (the full model), multivariate linear models using oceanographic 177

    distance, asymmetry and ΔSST as independent variables explained 58% (p < 0.01) and 18% (p < 178

    0.01) of the variance in subtidal and intertidal community structure (Figs. 3a and b) respectively. 179

    For both communities, oceanographic distance was most influential with the largest standard 180

    regression coefficient and semi-partial correlation coefficient (81.0% and 76.9%). ΔSST and 181

    asymmetry swap importance between the subtidal and intertidal communities with ΔSST being 182

    more influential on subtidal community similarity and less so for intertidal community similarity. 183

    For the subtidal community ΔSST then has the second largest semi-partial coefficient (17.5%) 184

    and oceanographic asymmetry has the smallest (1.5%), suggesting that asymmetry has little 185

  • 9

    influence in this model. In contrast, asymmetry has more unique explanatory power than ΔSST 186

    for the intertidal community (17.0% compared to 6.1% respectively). 187

    188

    We found notable differences between the subtidal and intertidal groups when comparing only 189

    pairs of sites between the mainland and the islands (the regional model, Figs. 3c and d 190

    respectively). In both cases the explanatory power (R2) of the multivariate models decrease, from 191

    0.58 to 0.41 in the subtidal community model and from 0.19 to 0.05 in the intertidal community. 192

    In particular, the intertidal model is not as significant (p < 0.1). For the subtidal community, 193

    ΔSST now has the largest influence with the largest standard regression coefficient and semi-194

    partial correlation coefficient (62.0%, Fig 3c). Relative to full model, the influence of 195

    oceanographic asymmetry increased (from 1.5% to 6.0%) and the oceanographic distance 196

    dropped (from 81.0% to 32.1%). For the intertidal community, asymmetry has the largest 197

    standard regression coefficient (68.8%). The influence of oceanographic distance decreased from 198

    76.9% in the full model to 31.3% in the regional model. Interestingly, ΔSST’s contribution to the 199

    regional model is zero. 200

    201

    Discussion 202

    Here, we present evidence for the influence of oceanographically mediated dispersal on spatial 203

    patterns of nearshore marine species community similarity. We developed two metrics of 204

    dispersal, oceanographic distance and asymmetry, using high-resolution ocean circulation 205

    simulation results. Both metrics describe spatial separation between nearshore locations based on 206

    the complex patterns of ocean circulation of the SCB. Oceanographic distance was defined as the 207

    mean of the two-way Lagrangian particle transit times and asymmetry as their absolute 208

  • 10

    difference. Oceanographic distances, relative to the thermal structure of the SCB, better explained 209

    community similarity. Further in the multivariate models, oceanographic asymmetry was found to 210

    be a statistically significant predictor variable, extending the explanatory power of oceanographic 211

    distances. Absolute differences in any environmental variable will be symmetric. In contrast, 212

    asymmetry is a quantity unique to oceanographically mediated dispersal and hence, provides 213

    direct evidence for its influence on patterns of community similarity in the SCB. 214

    215

    The explanatory power of the multivariate models is a result of the interaction between 216

    oceanographic distances and asymmetries; respectively, oceanographic distances and asymmetries 217

    were negatively and positively associated with community similarity. For example, take two pairs 218

    of sites [A, B] and [C, D] and assume that the oceanographic distance, the average of the two-way 219

    Lagrangian transit times, is 20 days for both. Now consider that the Lagrangian transit times for 220

    the [A, B] pair are 20 days each way, but between [C and D] the two-way times are different, say 221

    30 and 10 days. In the case of the [C, D] pair the minimum oceanographic distance is 10 days. 222

    This lower bound to the oceanographic distance, captured by our metric of oceanographic 223

    asymmetry, results in greater ocean connectivity and hence community similarity. Essentially, 224

    larger values of asymmetry result in a smaller minimum oceanographic distance. Note that using 225

    the minimum and maximum oceanographic distance in place of the mean created essentially the 226

    same result. Oceanographically, the weak explanatory power of oceanographic asymmetry, 227

    relative to oceanographic distance, indicates that dispersal between regions is dominated by 228

    bidirectional mesoscale eddy dynamics rather than unidirectional persistent currents (e.g., Siegel 229

    et al. 2008). 230

    231

  • 11

    Our analysis assumes an implicit relationship between ocean circulation and patterns of larval 232

    dispersal. This assumption could be inaccurate as many marine species’ larvae are thought to be 233

    able to influence their dispersal, for example through vertical behavior or late-larval period active 234

    swimming (e.g. Leis 2007, Shanks 2009). This larval behavior could have a large effect on 235

    dispersal patterns. However, although our metrics of oceanographic distance and asymmetry were 236

    derived from passive Lagrangian particles, it is likely that they describe the long-term patterns of 237

    dispersal in the SCB (Mitarai et al. 2009). Further, other than patterns of ocean circulation and 238

    dispersal, there are numerous physical and demographic factors that alter community similarity, 239

    for example wave exposure, air temperature (especially for intertidal species), larval mortality in 240

    the water column, settlement behavior and post-settlement processes. Thus, we may not expect 241

    these two quantities to be closely linked. Indeed, the low explanatory power of the intertidal 242

    multivariate models reveals that intertidal community similarity will be predominantly shaped by 243

    factors not included in this analysis. However, our key finding is not the absolute explanatory 244

    power of the multivariate models, rather it is the significance of the independent variables; the 245

    existence of a statistically significant relationship between these our metrics of dispersal, 246

    oceanographic distance and asymmetry, and community similarity suggests that 247

    oceanographically mediated dispersal is important to spatial patterns of community similarity. 248

    249

    We found that subtidal community similarity was better explained by oceanographic distance and 250

    asymmetry, relative to intertidal community similarity. There are several potential reasons for 251

    this. First, although our Lagrangian particle simulations accurately capture regional patterns of 252

    ocean circulation (Mitarai et al. 2009), surf-zone currents are not well represented. Hence, 253

    patterns of intertidal larval dispersal may not be well described by our calculations of 254

  • 12

    oceanographic distance and asymmetry. Indeed, surf-zone hydrodynamics and their effect on 255

    dispersal is an area of active debate; surf-zone currents could act to retain dispersing larvae and 256

    limit long distance dispersal (Shanks 2009). Second, in our data sets there are many more subtidal 257

    species, for example fish and invertebrates, which have long pelagic larval durations and the 258

    potential for long distance dispersal. Thus oceanographic distance and asymmetry, which likely 259

    describe patterns of long distance dispersal (i.e. > 1 km) rather than dispersal over short distances 260

    (i.e. < 1 km), are expected to show a stronger relationship with the subtidal species we examined. 261

    262

    Neutral theory suggests that spatial autocorrelation in dispersal will create a decline in 263

    compositional similarity between communities as distance between sites increases (Hubbell 2001, 264

    Gilbert et al. 2004). It is important then that the appropriate spatial basis, by which ‘distance’ is 265

    measured, be identified. For example, patterns of larval dispersal, at the temporal and spatial 266

    scales of this investigation, do not necessarily correspond with geographic distance (Appendix 1). 267

    Indeed, the predictive power of our multivariate models decreases when oceanographic distance 268

    in exchanged with geographic distance (Appendix 2). Further, asymmetry is not captured by 269

    geographic distance and hence it cannot be used to quantify a critical aspect of dispersal in the 270

    ocean. 271

    272

    Spatial patterns in biodiversity and community similarity are inherently dynamic. There is 273

    significant evidence suggesting that key oceanographic phenomena, such as El Niño events, are 274

    vital to larval recruitment and demographic processes of nearshore marine species in the SCB 275

    (Cowen et al. 1985, Selkoe et al. 2007). However, most analyses of community similarity are 276

    confined to static descriptors of spatial separation (i.e. geographic distance) and hence do not 277

  • 13

    account for such dynamism. In contrast, oceanographic distances and asymmetries are derived 278

    from multi-year simulations of ocean circulation patterns and hence quantify spatial separation as 279

    a dynamic property. In the SCB there is significant interannual and seasonal variation in patterns 280

    of ocean circulation (Dong et al. 2009; Mitarai et al. 2009, Watson et al. 2010) and these are 281

    reflected in our estimates of oceanographic distances and asymmetries. For example, some 282

    nearshore sites are effectively 'closer' together during El Niño conditions than during La Niña 283

    conditions (Appendix 3). Given the results of this paper, it is expected that such changes in 284

    'distance' will result in corresponding changes in community similarity for these years. 285

    286

    Understanding the processes that drive spatial patterns in community similarity is crucial to 287

    spatial fisheries management and conservation. The knowledge generated from quantitative 288

    investigations secure adequate representation of biodiversity in, for instance, marine protected 289

    areas (Lubchenco et al. 2003). For example in the SCB, knowledge of spatial patterns of 290

    community structure has already proven informative to spatial fisheries management (MLPA 291

    2009). Further, making use of real-time simulation data products (e.g. Chao et al. 2009) will 292

    greatly improve our ability to account for changes in patterns of community similarity. 293

    Ultimately, incorporating modeled oceanographic products, like those used here, will improve 294

    decision-making processes and our governance of nearshore living resources. 295

    296

    Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank the SWAT team, J. Elliott and E. Fields, 297

    NASA for graduate student support for JRW and NSF for support of the Flow, Fish and Fishing 298

    project. The authors also thank PISCO and the CRANE Program (specifically, the principal 299

    investigators: T. Anderson, M. Edwards, J. Car- roll, D. Schroeder, M. Carr, C. Syms, and D. 300

  • 14

    Pondella) for the use of their data. This is PISCO contribution number XXXX. 301

    302

    References 303

    1. Alberto, F., P. T. Raimondi, D. C. Reed, N. C. Coelho, R. Leblois, A. Whitmer, and E. A. Serrão. 304

    2010. Habitat continuity and geographic distance predict population genetic differentiation in 305

    giant kelp. Ecology 91: 49-56. 306

    2. Armstrong, R. A., and R. McGehee. 1980. Competitive exclusion. The American Naturalist 115: 307

    151-170. 308

    3. Baums, I. B., C. B. Paris, and L. M. Cherubin. 2006. A bio-oceanographic filter to larval dispersal 309

    in a reef-building coral. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51: 1969-1981. 310

    4. Blanchette, C. A., C. M. Miner, P. T. Raimondi, D. Lohse, K. E. K. Heady, and B. R. Broitman. 311

    2008. Biogeographical patterns of rocky intertidal communities along the Pacific coast of North 312

    America. Journal of Biogeography 35: 1593 – 1607. 313

    5. Bray, J. R., and J. T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern 314

    Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27: 325 – 349 315

    6. California Marine Life Protection Act, California Department of Fish and Game, CA, USA. 2009. 316

    http://www.dfg.ca.gov/mlpa/. 317

    7. Chao, Yi., Z. Li, J. Farrara, J. C. McWilliams. J. Bellingham, X. Capet, F. Chavex, J-K. Choi, R. 318

    Davis, J. Doyle, D. M. Fratantoni, P. Li. P. Marchesiello. M. A. Moline, J. Paduan, and S. Ramp. 319

    2009. Development, implementation and evaluation of a data-assimilative ocean forecasting 320

    system off the central California coast. Deep-Sea Research II 56: 100-126. 321

    8. Cottenie, K. 2005. Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community 322

    dynamics. Ecology Letters 8: 1175-1182. 323

  • 15

    9. Cowen, R. K. 1985. Large scale pattern of recruitment by the labrid, Semicossyphus pulcher: 324

    causes and implications. J Mar Res 43:719–742. 325

    10. Cowen, R. K., C. Paris, and A. Srinivasan. 2006. Scaling of connectivity in marine populations. 326

    Science 311: 522–53: 327

    11. The Cooperative Research Assessment of Nearshore Ecosystems program (CRANE). 2004. 328

    www.dfg.ca.gov/marine/fir/crane.asp. 329

    12. Dong, C., E. Idica, and J. C. McWilliams. 2009. Circulation and multiple-scale variability in the 330

    Southern California Bight. Progress in Oceanography 82: 168 - 190 331

    13. Gaines, S. D., and J. Roughgarden. 1985. Larval settlement rate: A leading determinant of 332

    structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 333

    3707-3711. 334

    14. Galindo, H. M., D. B. Olson, and S. R. Palumbi. 2006. Seascape genetics: a coupled 335

    oceanographic-genetic model predicts population structure of Caribbean corals. Current Biology 336

    16: 1622-1626. 337

    15. Gilbert, B., and M. J. Lechowicz. 2004. Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in temperate forest 338

    understory. PNAS. 101: 7651-7656. 339

    16. Hjort, J. 1914. Fluctuations in the great fisheries of northern Europe. Cons. Permanent. Int. 340

    Explor. Mer. Rapp. P-V Reun. 20:1–228. 341

    17. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton 342

    Univ. Press, Princeton. 343

    18. Kahru, M., and B. G. Mitchell. 2002. Influence of the El Niño – La Nina cycle on satellite derived 344

    primary production in the California Current. Geophysical Research Letters 29: 1–4. 345

    19. Kinlan, B. P., and S. D. Gaines. 2003. Propagule dispersal in marine and terrestrial environments: 346

  • 16

    a community perspective. Ecology 84: 2007-2020. 347

    20. Kool, J. D., C. B. Paris, S. Andrefoet, and R. K. Cowen. 2010. Complex migration and the 348

    development of genetic structure in subdivided populations: an example from Caribbean coral 349

    reef ecosystems. Ecography (In press). 350

    21. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Developments in Environmental 351

    Modelling, 2nd Edition. 352

    22. Leibold, M. A. 1995. The niche concept revisited: mechanistic models and community context. 353

    Ecology 76: 1371-1382. 354

    23. Leis, J. M. 2007. Behavior as input for modelling dispersal of fish larvae: behavior, 355

    biogeography, hydrodynamics, ontogeny, physiology and phylogeny meet hydrography. Mar. 356

    Ecol. Prog. Ser. 347: 185 - 193. 357

    24. Lichstein, J. W. 2007. Multiple regression on distance matrices: a multivariate spatial analysis 358

    tool. Plant Ecology 188: 117 – 131. 359

    25. Lubchenco, J., S. R. Palumbi, S. D. Gaines, and S. Andelman. 2003. Plugging the hole in the 360

    ocean: the emerging science of marine reserves. Ecology Applications 13: S3-S7. 361

    26. Menge, B. A., B. A. Daley, P. A. Wheeler, E. Dahlhoff, E. Sanford, and P. R. Strub. 1997. 362

    Benthi-pelagic links and rocky intertidal communities: Bottom-up effects on top-down control? 363

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 14530-14535. 364

    27. Mitarai, S., D. A. Siegel, J. R. Watson, C. Dong, and J. C. McWilliams. 2009. Quantifying 365

    connectivity in the coastal ocean with application to the Southern California Bight. Journal of 366

    Geophysical Research 114: C10026. 367

    28. Nekola, J. C., and P. S. White. 1999. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and 368

    ecology. Journal of Biogeography 26: 867-878. 369

  • 17

    29. Palumbi, S. R. 2003. Population genetics, demographic connectivity and the design of marine 370

    reservers. Ecological Applications 13: S146-S158. 371

    30. Selkoe, K. A., A. Vogel, and S. D. Gaines. 2007. Effects of ephemeral circulation on recruitment 372

    and connectivity of nearshore fish populations spanning Southern and Baja California. Mar Ecol 373

    Prog Ser. 351: 209–220. 374

    31. Selkoe, K. A., J. R. Watson, C. White, T. B. Horin, M. Iacchei, S. Mitarai, D. A. Siegel. S. D. 375

    Gaines and R. J. Toonen. 2010. Taking the chaos out of genetic patchiness: seascape genetics 376

    reveals ecological and oceanographic drivers of genetic patterns in three temperate reef species. 377

    Molecular Ecology. In press. 378

    32. Shanks, A. L. 2009. Pelagic larval duration and dispersal distance revisted. Biol. Bull. 216: 373-379

    385. 380

    33. Siegel, D.A., S. Mitarai, C.J. Costello, S.D. Gaines, B.E. Kendall, R.R. Warner and K.B. Winters, 381

    2008. The stochastic nature of larval connectivity among nearshore marine populations. 382

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105, 8974-8979. 383

    34. Tobler, W. R. 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ. 384

    Geogr. 46: 234-240. 385

    35. Watson, J. R., S. Mitarai, D. A. Siegel, J. E. Caselle, C. Dong, and J. C. McWilliams. 2010. 386

    Realized and potential larval connectivity in the Southern California Bight. Marine Ecology 387

    Progress Series 401: 31-48. 388

    36. White, C., K. A. Selkoe, J. Watson, D.A. Siegel, D.C. Zacherl, and R.J.Toonen, 2010. Ocean 389

    currents help explain population genetic structure. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B: 390

    Biological Sciences 277: 1685-1694. 391

    392

  • 18

    392

    Figure 1. (a) The Southern California Bight with average sea surface temperature (for the period 393

    1998-2008). Empirical intertidal (white stars) and subtidal (black stars) sampling locations are 394

    shown. (b) Example 30 day simulated Lagrangian particle trajectories. Particles were released 395

    within the green circle on 1st of September 1997. Their locations 30 days after passive advection 396

    by ocean currents are identified by blue dots. (c) Example oceanographic distances - the number 397

    of days, on average, for a Lagrangian particle to travel from the pink site to all others.398

  • 19

    399

    Figure 2. Univariate comparison of community similarity with oceanographic distance, 400

    asymmetry and ΔSST for the (a, c, e) subtidal and (b, d, f) intertidal sites. Mantel correlation (r) 401

    and p-values (p) are shown. 402

    403

  • 20

    403

    Figure 3. Standardized regression (diamonds) and semi-partial correlation coefficients 404

    (percentages) for the multiple linear regression models. Independent variables are on the x-axis: 405

    oceanographic distance (Oc-D), oceanographic asymmetry (Oc-Asym) and the difference in sea-406

    surface temperature (ΔSST). Error-bars describe the 95% confidence interval for the regression 407

    coefficients. Full models, using all sampling sites for the subtidal (a) and intertidal (b). Regional 408

    models comparing community similarity between only islands and mainland sites for the subtidal 409

    (c) and intertidal (d) communities. 410

    411