Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

download Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

of 25

Transcript of Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    1/25

    Evidence Based Study ofNoise Impacting Annoyance

    Presented to

    Fourth International Meeting on Wind

    Turbine Noise

    Rome Italy 11-14 April 2011

    William K.G. Palmer B.A.Sc. P. Eng.

    [email protected]

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    2/25

    Outline of Presentation

    Complaints about noise and annoyancefrom wind turbines are increasing

    Some medical professionals link noiseand annoyance to adverse health effects

    Engineering problem solving says lookfor changes as the cause of problems

    This presentation gives a procedure tocollect and evaluate evidence ofchanges in noise levels at sites meetingregulatory approval

    Discussion of resulting recommended

    regulatory changes follows

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    3/25

    Initial Sound Level ReadingsdBA dBC dBA -C Turbines

    Control 28 42-44 14-16 5000m@24%

    Home 1 39.5 60-65 20.5-25 620m

    @32%

    Home 2 40.5-42.5 58-70 17.5-27.5 560m@72%

    Home 1 40.5-41.5 60-75 19.5-33.5 620m

    @72%

    Home 3 41.5 60-72 18.5-30.5 450m

    @50%

    Home 4 41.5-42.5 60-72 18.5-29.5 450m

    @50%

    Home 5 40-41 60-68 20-27 650m

    @35%

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    4/25

    Knowles Microphone

    Flat 20 Hz to 8000 Hz

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    5/25

    1000 Hz Calibrator on Audacity Recorder

    Gives editing capability to expand scale.

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    6/25

    1000 Hz Calibrator expanded to

    0.03 second trace

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    7/25

    Used Audacity to Perform

    Frequency Analysis

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    8/25

    Typical Monitoring Setup

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    9/25

    Data Collection

    Readings were taken at a series of locations

    (10 km radius from centre) within a 2 hourperiod

    Same terrain, same general proximity toforested areas, same weather, fundamentally

    same wind speed Recorded time, wind speed, turbine output,

    weather conditions (wind direction), dBA anddBC sound levels.

    Performed a minimum 30 second to 5 minuterecording

    Over 250 samples taken in all seasons, fromMarch 2010 to March 2011 (and continuing)

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    10/25

    Sound Levels at Test Homes

    Turbines Not Operating

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    11/25

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    12/25

    Sound Levels at Test Homes

    Turbines Synchronized at 0%

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    13/25

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    14/25

    Turbines at 25% Output

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    15/25

    Comparison of Sound Levels at Homes Near and Far From Turbines ~ 25%

    -80.0

    -60.0

    -40.0

    -20.0

    0.0

    20.0

    40.0

    60.0

    80.0

    16 Hz 32 Hz 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1000Hz 2000Hz 4000Hz 8000Hz 10oc Leq

    Frequency (Hz)

    TLE Jun10@0205_22% CSK Jun10@0320_22% SCH Jun10@0358_29%

    A Weighting Factor A-wt TLE Jun10@0205_22% A-wt CSK Jun10@0320_22%

    A-wt SCH Jun10@0358_29%

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    16/25

    Turbines at High Power ~ 88%

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    17/25

    Sound Level at Homes at Varying Distance - Wind Turbines - High

    Power (88%) - 10 m wind speed ~ 8 mps

    0.0

    10.0

    20.0

    30.0

    40.0

    50.0

    60.0

    70.0

    80.0

    90.0

    16 Hz 32 Hz 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1000Hz 2000Hz 4000Hz 8000Hz 10oc Leq

    Frequency in Hertz (Hz)

    SMI Nov20 0450 CSK Nov20 0526 SR10 Nov20 0552 TLE Nov20 0630

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    18/25

    Winter Storm - Turbines 88%

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    19/25

    Observations From Data

    Sound levels in low frequency octaves (16, 32,64, 125 Hz) is ~ 20 dB higher at approvedhomes compared to control home in sameenvironment

    Sound levels at approved homes for 0 power,with wind speeds 1 m/s is same as sound levelat control home when wind speed is > 8m/s (30km/hr fresh breeze Beaufort F. 5)

    At low frequency octaves up to 125 Hz, as windspeed increases from 1 m/s to 8 m/s, controlhome increases by 10 dB from ~ 20 to 30 dBA,approved homes increase 30 dB to 50 dBA

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    20/25

    Impact of Cyclical Sound

    What the figures do not show is theimpact of the cyclical sound

    Also have data that shows that the sound

    level is strongly correlated to the turbineoutput and very weakly correlated to the

    ground level wind speeds at approved

    homes near turbines

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    21/25

    Sound at SMI Site

    Nov 20, 2010

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    22/25

    Sound at CSK Site - Nov 20, 2010

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    23/25

    Sound at SCH Site - Feb 15, 2011

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    24/25

  • 8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR

    25/25

    Regulatory Updates

    Need to consider level weighting, notA-weighting of sound levels that neglects lowfrequency components

    Need to consider cyclical sound and its

    increased impact and perception Need to assess the under prediction of noise

    levels by models, as most audits showexcesses

    Excesses above background of 3 dB arereadily perceived, 20 dB excesses areunjustified by any criteria