Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
Transcript of Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
1/25
Evidence Based Study ofNoise Impacting Annoyance
Presented to
Fourth International Meeting on Wind
Turbine Noise
Rome Italy 11-14 April 2011
William K.G. Palmer B.A.Sc. P. Eng.
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
2/25
Outline of Presentation
Complaints about noise and annoyancefrom wind turbines are increasing
Some medical professionals link noiseand annoyance to adverse health effects
Engineering problem solving says lookfor changes as the cause of problems
This presentation gives a procedure tocollect and evaluate evidence ofchanges in noise levels at sites meetingregulatory approval
Discussion of resulting recommended
regulatory changes follows
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
3/25
Initial Sound Level ReadingsdBA dBC dBA -C Turbines
Control 28 42-44 14-16 5000m@24%
Home 1 39.5 60-65 20.5-25 620m
@32%
Home 2 40.5-42.5 58-70 17.5-27.5 560m@72%
Home 1 40.5-41.5 60-75 19.5-33.5 620m
@72%
Home 3 41.5 60-72 18.5-30.5 450m
@50%
Home 4 41.5-42.5 60-72 18.5-29.5 450m
@50%
Home 5 40-41 60-68 20-27 650m
@35%
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
4/25
Knowles Microphone
Flat 20 Hz to 8000 Hz
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
5/25
1000 Hz Calibrator on Audacity Recorder
Gives editing capability to expand scale.
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
6/25
1000 Hz Calibrator expanded to
0.03 second trace
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
7/25
Used Audacity to Perform
Frequency Analysis
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
8/25
Typical Monitoring Setup
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
9/25
Data Collection
Readings were taken at a series of locations
(10 km radius from centre) within a 2 hourperiod
Same terrain, same general proximity toforested areas, same weather, fundamentally
same wind speed Recorded time, wind speed, turbine output,
weather conditions (wind direction), dBA anddBC sound levels.
Performed a minimum 30 second to 5 minuterecording
Over 250 samples taken in all seasons, fromMarch 2010 to March 2011 (and continuing)
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
10/25
Sound Levels at Test Homes
Turbines Not Operating
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
11/25
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
12/25
Sound Levels at Test Homes
Turbines Synchronized at 0%
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
13/25
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
14/25
Turbines at 25% Output
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
15/25
Comparison of Sound Levels at Homes Near and Far From Turbines ~ 25%
-80.0
-60.0
-40.0
-20.0
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
16 Hz 32 Hz 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1000Hz 2000Hz 4000Hz 8000Hz 10oc Leq
Frequency (Hz)
TLE Jun10@0205_22% CSK Jun10@0320_22% SCH Jun10@0358_29%
A Weighting Factor A-wt TLE Jun10@0205_22% A-wt CSK Jun10@0320_22%
A-wt SCH Jun10@0358_29%
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
16/25
Turbines at High Power ~ 88%
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
17/25
Sound Level at Homes at Varying Distance - Wind Turbines - High
Power (88%) - 10 m wind speed ~ 8 mps
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
16 Hz 32 Hz 63 Hz 125 Hz 250 Hz 500 Hz 1000Hz 2000Hz 4000Hz 8000Hz 10oc Leq
Frequency in Hertz (Hz)
SMI Nov20 0450 CSK Nov20 0526 SR10 Nov20 0552 TLE Nov20 0630
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
18/25
Winter Storm - Turbines 88%
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
19/25
Observations From Data
Sound levels in low frequency octaves (16, 32,64, 125 Hz) is ~ 20 dB higher at approvedhomes compared to control home in sameenvironment
Sound levels at approved homes for 0 power,with wind speeds 1 m/s is same as sound levelat control home when wind speed is > 8m/s (30km/hr fresh breeze Beaufort F. 5)
At low frequency octaves up to 125 Hz, as windspeed increases from 1 m/s to 8 m/s, controlhome increases by 10 dB from ~ 20 to 30 dBA,approved homes increase 30 dB to 50 dBA
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
20/25
Impact of Cyclical Sound
What the figures do not show is theimpact of the cyclical sound
Also have data that shows that the sound
level is strongly correlated to the turbineoutput and very weakly correlated to the
ground level wind speeds at approved
homes near turbines
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
21/25
Sound at SMI Site
Nov 20, 2010
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
22/25
Sound at CSK Site - Nov 20, 2010
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
23/25
Sound at SCH Site - Feb 15, 2011
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
24/25
-
8/6/2019 Palmer WTN2011 PresentationR
25/25
Regulatory Updates
Need to consider level weighting, notA-weighting of sound levels that neglects lowfrequency components
Need to consider cyclical sound and its
increased impact and perception Need to assess the under prediction of noise
levels by models, as most audits showexcesses
Excesses above background of 3 dB arereadily perceived, 20 dB excesses areunjustified by any criteria