8695838

download 8695838

of 8

Transcript of 8695838

  • 7/24/2019 8695838

    1/8

    ACCURACY MEASUREMENT OF

    GRAFTING DEGREE OF RADIATION-

    INDUCED SURFACE GRAFT

    POLYMERIZATION BY WEIGHING

    Jingxin Lei,* Qiman Li, and Guangjian He

    Polymer Research Institute of Sichuan University,

    Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples Republic of China

    ABSTRACT

    Weighing by an electron analytical balance is one of the simple

    and direct methods to measure the grafting degree of a polymer,

    usually defined as:

    Gm

    wa2

    wb=wb

    100%

    1

    whereGm,wa, andwbrepresent the grafting degree, the weights of

    sample after and before grafting, respectively. However, the

    measured grafting degree by weighing is not accurate due to

    omission of the weight losses during radiation and surface-graft

    copolymerization in the reaction media. In this paper, corona

    discharge-induced surface graft copolymerization of acrylic

    amide (AAM) onto biaxial oriented polypropylene (BOPP) was

    studied. The results show that the weight losses during corona-

    discharge treatment and copolymerization in the AAM solution

    are quite high compared to the measured grafting degree. The

    weight loss increases with treatment time, AAM concentration,

    51

    Copyright q 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. www.dekker.com

    *Corresponding author. Fax: (862) 854-02465; E-mail: [email protected]

    POLYM.PLAST. TECHNOL. ENG., 41(1), 5157 (2002)

  • 7/24/2019 8695838

    2/8

    reaction time, and temperature. The measured grafting degrees

    according to Eq. (1) are all less than zero and decrease with the

    reaction time and AAM concentration in the reaction solution,

    conflicting with the x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and

    infrared (IR) spectra of our previous work (1). After adding the

    weight losses, the true grafting degree increases with reaction time

    and AAM concentration, in agreement with the rule of common

    graft polymerization. The true grafting degree must be described

    as:

    Gt Gm 1 Gi 1 Gs 2

    where Gt, Gm, Gi, and Gs represent the true grafting degree,

    measured grafting degree as described in Eq. (1), weight lossduring irradiation, and weight loss in the reaction media in wt%

    based on the initial weight, respectively.

    Key Words: Grafting degree; Measurement; Radiation-grafted

    copolymerization; Weighing

    INTRODUCTION

    Surface grafting is one of the common methods to improve the surface

    properties of polymer materials, e.g., to enhance printing, painting, and adhesive

    properties. Glow discharge (2), corona discharge (3,4), ultraviolet light (5,6),

    electron beam (7), and g-ray (8,9) radiation-induced surface graft polymeriz-ations are the more favored graft polymerization methods due to their high

    efficiency and ease of processing. They introduce active sites (excited molecular,

    free radical, peroxide in oxygen-containing atmosphere, etc.) in a polymer to be

    used in graft polymerization subsequently. In order to meet the practical

    requirements, a suitable grafting degree is the most important parameter for

    surface-graft modification. A very low grafting degree cannot be effective

    enough for modification of polymer materials, while a very high grafting degree

    can decrease some properties and increase the cost. The grafting degree is also the

    basis parameter for surface properties and structure analysis. Therefore, an

    accurately measured grafting degree may be the most important parameter for

    surface-graft modification of polymer materials in theory and practical

    applications.

    The surface-graft copolymerization has been demonstrated extensively by

    various physicochemical methods such as x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy

    (XPS) and infrared spectroscopy (IR), but the most simple and direct way to

    determine the grafting degree is by weight measurement using an electron

    LEI, LI, AND HE52

  • 7/24/2019 8695838

    3/8

    analytical balance. In this method (3,6 8), the grafting degree is almost defined

    as the weight increase of the samples [Eq. (1)]. However, the weight losses during

    radiation and copolymerization in the reaction media have been omitted in all the

    relevant papers we obtained, which affects the measurement accuracy of the

    grafting degree greatly.

    It was well known that radiation etches the polymer and reduces its

    weight, and when immersed in a certain solution, the additives and the

    oligomers in the polymer materials may dissolve, which also leads to the

    weight loss of polymer materials. Consequently, the measured grafting degree

    as described in Eq. (1) is lower than its actual value. For surface

    modification, the absolute amount of grafted monomers is usually quite low

    in weight as compared to the bulk weight of samples because the grafting is

    restricted only to the surface region. Under some graft conditions, themeasured grafting degree by weighting may be less than zero, but XPS, IR,

    or other methods show that the graft copolymerization has taken place. The

    true grafting degree is described in Eq. (2).

    This article describes the corona discharge-induced graft copolymeriza-

    tion of acrylic amide (AAM) onto biaxial oriented polypropylene (BOPP), by

    which we intend to demonstrate that the measurement of grafting degree by

    weight requires the consideration of weight loss during corona-discharge

    pretreatment and polymerization in the graft reaction media.

    EXPERIMENTAL

    Materials

    Biaxial oriented polypropylene film (0.02 mm thickness), a commercial

    single layer film, was made through tenter frame process by Foshan East

    Packaging Material Co., Foshan, China. Acrylic amide monomer used was of

    chemical purity.

    Preparation of Graft Sample

    The AAM was recrystallized from benzene at 808C, the BOPP film was

    coated with benezophenone sensitizer, and grafting was done by the same

    procedures as described in the previous study (1). The grafted BOPP films were

    washed with hot water at 60708C to remove homopolymers and then dried in a

    vacuum oven at 508C for 48 hr. The grafting degree was measured from the

    increase in weight of the sample as described in Eq. (1).

    ACCURACY MEASUREMENT OF GRAFTING DEGREE 53

  • 7/24/2019 8695838

    4/8

    X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Analysis

    The XPS were obtained on a Kratos XSAM 800 spectrometer manufactured

    by Kratos Co., Manchester, UK, using a monochromatic Al Ka

    photon source.

    RESULTS

    The data listed in Table 1 show that with the increase in the AAM

    concentration in the reaction media, the measured grafting degree increases, butis always less than zero. From Table 2, we can see that the measured grafting

    Table 1. Effect of Acrylic Amide (AAM) Concentration on the Grafting Degree of the

    Biaxial Oriented Polypropylene (BOPP) Film.

    AAM Concentration (%) 5 10 15 20 25 30

    Measured grafting degree

    (wt%)

    22.04 22.1 22.0 21.9 21.6 21.6

    Weight loss of untreated BOPP

    film during immersion in

    AAM solution (wt%)

    1.30 1.60 1.70 1.80 2.00 2.20

    Weight loss during corona-

    discharge treatment (wt%)

    2.03 2.03 2.03 2.03 2.03 2.03

    True grafting degree (wt%) 1.29 1.53 1.73 1.93 2.43 2.63

    Corona-Discharge pretreatment: 2 min; Reaction temperature: 708C; Time: 1.5 hr;

    Atmosphere: N2.

    Table 2. Effect of Reaction Time on the Grafting Degree of Biaxial Oriented

    Polypropylene (BOPP) Film

    Reaction Time 0 min 10 min 30 min 1.0 hr 1.5 hr

    Measured grafting degree (wt%) 22.03 22.5 22.5 22.52 21.9

    Weight loss of untreated BOPP

    film during immersion in AAM

    solution (wt%)

    0 0.70 0.90 1.50 1.80

    Weight loss during corona-discharge

    treatment (wt%)

    2.03 2.03 2.03 2.03 2.03

    True grafting degree (wt%) 0.00 0.23 0.43 1.01 1.93

    Corona-Discharge pretreatment: 2 min; Reaction temperature: 708C; Acrylic amide

    (AAM) concentration: 20%; Atmosphere: N2.

    LEI, LI, AND HE54

  • 7/24/2019 8695838

    5/8

    degree is also less than zero but there is no significant effect on the

    copolymerization reaction time. However, in our previous study (1), the XPS and

    IR spectra demonstrate that the grafting of AAM onto BOPP has taken place as

    expected, and the peel strength of the BOPP film adhered by a commercial 502

    adhesive improved quite a lot after grafting. The C1score level scan XPS spectra

    Figure 1. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of the grafted BOPP films with different

    reaction times (corona-discharge pretreatment: 2 min; reaction temperature: 708C, AAM

    concentration: 20%, atmosphere: N2) (a) 0 min; (b) 30 min; and (c) 60 min.

    Table 3. Weight Loss of the Biaxial Oriented Polypropylene (BOPP) Film During

    Corona-Discharge Pretreatment

    Treatment Time (min) 0.5 1 2 3 5 10

    Weight loss (wt%) 1.20 1.61 2.03 2.12 2.50 4.53

    Voltage: 15 kV, at ambient temperature in air.

    ACCURACY MEASUREMENT OF GRAFTING DEGREE 55

  • 7/24/2019 8695838

    6/8

    of the starting BOPP film and the AAM-grafted BOPP films are shown in Fig. 1.The film surface at the beginning had only a strong alkyl carbon (}C}C})

    peak at ,285.0 eV (Fig. 1(a)). The AAM-grafted surface shows one strong peak

    at a higher binding energy (Fig. 1(b and c)). The peak of the high binding-energy

    region for the grafted surface corresponds to a carbon atom with double bonds to

    oxygen and one bond to nitrogen at ,288.0 eV (}(Ov)C}N} from amide

    groups). This confirms that the film surface is covered with the grafted AAM. So

    we believe that the deviations between the measured grafting degree and the true

    grafting degree come from weight losses as discussed above.

    From Table 3, we can see that during corona discharge, the weight loss of

    BOPP film is very high. However, some of the grafting degrees are still less than

    zero after adding the weight loss during radiation (Tables 1 and 2).

    The data listed in Tables 1, 2, and 4 show that during immersion in the

    AAM solution for copolymerization, the weight loss of the BOPP film increaseswith AAM concentration, reaction time, and temperature, respectively. So weight

    losses in the AAM solution at certain conditions also should be added when the

    grafting degree is determined.

    From Tables 2 and 3, we can see that the true grafting degree, equal to

    the measured grafting degree plus weight losses during corona-discharge

    treatment and copolymerization in the AAM solution, increases with the

    reaction time and the AAM concentration, agreeing with the rule of common

    graft polymerization.

    CONCLUSIONS

    For radiation-induced surface graft copolymerization, the accuracy

    measurement of grafting degree by weighing should consider the weight losses

    during radiation and surface-graft copolymerization in the reaction media. The

    accurate grafting degree must be described as in Eq. (2).

    Table 4. Weight Loss of the Biaxial Oriented Polypropylene (BOPP) Film During

    Immersion in Acrylic Amide (AAM) Solution at Different Temperatures

    Temperature (8C) 30 60 70

    Weight loss of untreated BOPP

    film during immersion in AAM

    solution (wt%)

    1.40 1.60 1.80

    Time: 1.5 hr; Acrylic amide (AAM) Concentration: 20%; Atmosphere: N2.

    LEI, LI, AND HE56

  • 7/24/2019 8695838

    7/8

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The authors are grateful to the National Nature Science Foundation of

    China for supporting this research work (NSFC No. 29804007).

    REFERENCES

    1. Lei, J.X.; Li, Q.M.; He, G.J.; Lin, X.H. Acta Chim. Sin.2000,58, 598.

    2. Wu, S.; Kang, E.T.; Neoh, K.G.; Han, H.S.; Tan, K.L. Macromolecules

    1999, 32, 186.

    3. Lei, J.X.; Shi, M.W.; Zhang, J.C. Eur. Polym. J. 2000, 36, 1277.

    4. Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.W.; Khang, G.; Lee, H.B. Biomaterials1997, 18 (4), 351.5. Yang, W.T.; Ranby, B. Eur. Polym. J.1999, 35, 1557.

    6. Chun, H.J.; Cho, S.M.; Lee, Y.M.; Lee, H.K.; Suh, T.S.; Shinn, K.S. J. Appl.

    Polym. Sci. 1999, 72, 251.

    7. Wirsen, A.; Lindberg, K.T.; Albertsson, A.C. Polymer1996, 37, 761.

    8. El-Nesr, E.M.; Dessouki, A.M.; Abdel-Bary, E.M. Polym. Int.1998,46, 150.

    9. Zhao, J.Q.; Geuskens, G. Eur. Polym. J. 1999, 35, 2115.

    ACCURACY MEASUREMENT OF GRAFTING DEGREE 57

  • 7/24/2019 8695838

    8/8