노인 문화예술교육 프로그램 운영 방안 연구05-09... · 최종연구보고서 노인 문화예술교육 프로그램 운영 방안 연구 2005. 12. 23
문화예술교육 포럼 결과자료집
93
문화예술교육, 역할 묻기
description
Â
Transcript of 문화예술교육 포럼 결과자료집
,
2012 ,
2013. 2. 14
workroom
Korea Arts & Culture Education [email protected]
KACES-1240-C007
,
,
,
2012
Arts & Culture Education Forum 2012
KACES-1240-C007
,
,
,
,
Session 1 ,
“ ”— ,
· ,
, SOS
: , —
,
2012 ⌜ 1 ⌟ , . 2012 ⌜ 2 ⌟ , .
20
20
21
21
22
26
29
46
814
Session 2
,
, ( ) ,
—
,
—
,
—
,
Session 3 ,
,
,
‘ ’ !— ‘ ’
,
,
66
76
86
91
108
111
114
120
,
, ,
Session 1
:
,
“ ”,
Session 2
! !,
,
126
127
130
141
148
158
Discussion ,
,
- , TF
,
,
:
,
168
172
176
179
182
,
Final Report
,
Final Report
2012 8 9Final Report
— : 1 — : , — :
— : 2012 3 21 ( ) 14:00–18:30— : ( 10 , )— : 310— : , , , · , — · : ·— :
— : ,
2012 ⌜ 1 ⌟, .
(220 ) · ·
13:30-14:00 30
Opening 30
14:00-14:10 10 ,
14:10-14:20 10 , ,
14:20-14:25 5 ,
14:25-14:30 5 , ( )
Session 1 45 ,
14:30-14:35 5 “ ”— UCC 作
, · ,
14:35-14:55 20 , —
, SOS
14:55-15:15 20 , —
,
Session 2 90
15:15-16:15 60 ,
— ,
— , ( ) , ( )— , — , — ,
16:15-16:25 10 — —
16:25-16:45 20
Session 3 55 ,
16:45-17:30 45 , —
— , , — , — , — , — ,
17:30-17:35 5
17:35-17:40 5 , ( )
2012 10 11Final Report
— ,
, , , · ,
—
—
— — UCC , ·
, ·
,
( ) · ( )
—
4
— ,
� “ ” , “ · · ”
— � , , , , ,
“ , , , ” ,
— ,
• : : ,
· — ‘ ’
,
• : STEAM(Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics)
— 310 88 / 4.00 (5.00 ) — • , ( , ),
• ·
•
1 . 4.33
2 . 4.23
3 . 4.11
4 . 4.05
5 . 3.30
6 5 , ' ' . 4.18
7 . 3.99
8 . 4.06
9 . 3.89
10 . 3.90
4.00
2012 12 13Final Report
4.33 4.23 4.11 4.05
3.30
4.18 3.99 4.06 3.89 3.90
5
3
4
2
1
0 1.
.
2.
.
3.
.
4.
.
5.
.
6. 5 ,
' '
.
7.
.
8.
.
9.
.
10. .
· , , ,
— ,
— -
• : ,
— , ,
— , ( )
. ( )
— ‘ ’ ,
— ,
— ,
,
—
( ,
) —
— - , - -
, , , · , , ( )
No
1 03.20( ) , 21
2 03.20( ) “ ”
3 03.20( ) “ ”
4 03.20.( ) ‘ · ’
5 03.23( ) ‘ ’ ‘ ’
6 03.26( ) ‘ ’… ‘ ’
7 03.26( ) TV , !
8 03.27( ) ,
9 04.02( ) , ... !
10 04.02( ) “ ”
11 05.08( ) KBS
12 5 2012 ( , )
2012 14 15Final Report
— : 2 — : , — : 2012 9 27 ( ) 14:30-17:40— : 1 — : 170 — : , ( · , ,
) — : , — : · ·
— : ,
2012 ⌜ 2 ⌟, .
(160 ) · ·
Opening 25
14:30-14:40 10 , ,
14:40-14:50 10
14:50-14:55 5 , ( )
Session 1 45 ,
14:55-15:00 5
15:00-15:20 20 , —
—
,
15:20-15:40 20 “ ”— “ ” —
,
15:40-15:50 10
Session 2 30
15:50-16:20 30 —
—
—
,
,
,
Discussion 50 ,
16:20-17:05 45 ·
—
— , — , — , TF— , — , — ,
17:05-17:10 5
2012 16 17Final Report
—
,
— ,
— ,
— , ,
— ,
—
,
— 4.20 (5.00 ) / 170 81 — • ,
• ( ) • ,
1 . 3.90
2 . 3.99
3 . 4.16
4 . 4.46
5 . 4.11
6 . 4.17
7 . 4.47
8 . 4.35
4.20
3.90 3.99 4.16
4.46
4.11 4.17
4.474.35
5
3
4
2
1
0 1.
.
2.
.
3.
.
4.
.
5.
.
6. .
7.
.
8.
.
— : KTV ‘ ’ — : 2012 09 27 18 30— : ‘ ’
( 1 46 )
,
2012. 3. 21 [ ] 14:00 – 17:40
2012 , 20 21
, ?
3 .
, .
. .
.
, , ,
, , .
,
“ ” .
? , .
2 6 「 」 .
, .
. ‘
(Zero-tolerance)’ ,
. ·
.
‘ ’ .
(1,000 ), (150 ),
(100 ) ,
, .
“ , ” 「2012
」 .
· ·
.
· · 8 , 1 1
.
, .
? .
. ,
.
.
.
?
‘ ’ , ,
,
, .
,
.
.
, , , .
.
「 」 ,
. ,
. 「 」 .
.
.
,
.
「2012 」 ,
.
,
.
, , ,
. .
「2012 」 ,
, .
“ ” ,
. ,
· . .
.
, .
, .
‘ ’ ‘ ’
.
, 「2012 」 . .
2012 , 22 23
(220 ) · ·
13:30-14:00 30
Opening 30
14:00-14:10 10 ,
14:10-14:20 10 , ,
14:20-14:25 5 ,
14:25-14:30 5 , ( )
Session 1 45 ,
14:30-14:35 5 “ ”— UCC 作
, · ,
14:35-14:55 20 , —
, SOS
14:55-15:15 20 , —
,
(220 ) · ·
Session 2 90
15:15-16:15 60 ,
— ,
— , ( ) , ( )— , — , — ,
16:15-16:25 10 — —
16:25-16:45 20
Session 3 55 ,
16:45-17:30 45 , —
— , , — , — , — , — ,
17:30-17:35 5
17:35-17:40 5 , ( )
,
Session 1.
27" "Session 1.,
“ ”, ,
. 2011 , . UCC ,
.
UCC , .
“ ” UCC , ,
UCC
. . , .
, .
. ,
.
, . .
. ‘ ?’ .
. .
. .
. , . .
.
.
‘ ’ .
.
·
2012 , 28
,
. .
.
. ,
.
SOS
2012 , 30 31 Session 1.,
2011 1 2011 1 18.3%,
15.7% . 2010 11.8% , 2010 11.4%
. , , , .
.
( 4~ 2) 9,174
2011 12 1 ~ 2012 1 31
< 1> 2011
. 2011
,
.
2011 9,174 , 1 1,673 (18.2%) , ‘ (68.6%)’ ‘ 1-2 ’(15.4%),
‘ 1-2 ’(5.8%), ‘ 1-2 ’(3.9%), ‘ (10 )’(6.2%) . 2010 ‘
’ 1 30.8% 2011 31.4% .
< 1>
2010 2011
287 (69.2%) 1,148 (68.6%)
1-2 61 (14.7%) 258 (15.4%)
1-2 19 (4.6%) 97 (5.8%)
1-2 16 (3.9%) 66 (3.9%)
(10 ) 32 (7.7%) 104 (6.2%)
415 (100%) 1,673 (100%)
‘ ’ (2,834 )
. ‘ 5 (21.8%)’, ‘ 4 (14.5%)’
. 2011 ‘ 1-3 ’ 26.5% , ‘ 4-6 ’ 46.2% . 2010 , ‘ 1-3 ’ 17%, ‘ 4-6 ’ 35.9%
. ,
, .
1 , 2 ,
. ,
.
2012 , 32 33 Session 1.,
2010 2011
1-3 174 (17.5%) 750 (26.5%)
4-6 356 (35.9%) 1,311 (46.2%)
1 186 (18.8%) 355 (12.5%)
2 124 (12.5%) 253 (8.9%)
3 98 (9.9%) 75 (2.6%)
1 53 (5.3%) 60 (2.1%)
2 - 30 (1.0%)
991 (100%) 2,834 (100%)
< 2>
2010 2
2011 1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2
1 . ‘1 (32.1%)’, ‘2~5 (52.0%)’, ‘6 (15.9%)’
2 67.9% . 2010 , ‘1 (33.8%)’,
‘2~5 (49.9%)’, ‘6 (16.3%)’ 2 66.2% .
2 77.6% . ,
,
,
.
4 ~ 1 2
.
9,174 785 (8.6%)
. ‘ (6 ) ’ 48.9% . . , ‘
(6 ) ’ ‘ (6 ) ’ 48.9% ·
, .
. .
< 3>
2010 2011
1 141 (33.8%) 512 (32.1%)
2-5 208 (49.9%) 828 (52.0%)
6 68 (16.3%) 253 (15.9%)
415 (100%) 1,673 (100%)
1 2~3 4~5 (6 )
1 184 92 12 15 303
52.9% 32.7% 19.4% 16.0% 38.6%
2~3 70 105 18 24 217
20.1% 37.4% 29.0% 25.5% 27.6%
4~5 59 37 17 9 122
17.0% 13.2% 27.4% 9.6% 15.5%
(6 )
35 47 15 46 143
10.1% 16.7% 24.2% 48.9% 18.2%
348 281 62 94 785
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
< 4>
2012 , 34 35 Session 1.,
1,575 (56.3%)
. 56.3% .
1 ‘ (29.9%)’, 2 ‘ (25.3%)’ .
‘ (31.4%)’ .
‘ (26.6%)’, ‘ (19.7%)’, ‘ (17.1%)’ .
, .
, ! .
. ‘ (50.7%)’ , ‘
(11.1%)’, ‘ (9.6%)’
. , ‘ (33.8%)’ , .
, , .
‘ (63.4%)’, ‘ (50.7%)’,
‘ (31.4%)’ . .
, 37.2% .
, .
62.2% . 2010 (61.6%)
, · , , ,
.
‘1 ’
28.9% . , 10 2~3 , 2,308 72.7%
,
.
< 5> 1 , : 59
( ) (%)
1,575 56.3
1,223 43.7
2,798 100.0
< 2>
2012 , 36 37 Session 1.,
1 · 1 1,677 (18.3%)
10 2 , 1,529 ‘ ~2 (53.9%)’, ‘2 -3 (15.7%)’, ‘3 -6 (16.2%)’,
‘6 -1 (14.2%)’ 3 30.4% .
‘ ’(1 ), ‘
’(2 ), ‘ ’(3 ) . .
‘ ’ 51.5% 48.3% . , ‘ ’ 35.0%
33.6% .
‘ ’ 4.4% , 19.5% 4
.
< 3> 1
< 4> 1
( , ) 9,174
1,674 (18.2%) . , ‘ ’(49.3%) ‘ 1-2 ’(24.5%), ‘ 1-2 ’(10.3%), ‘
1-2 ’(8.1%), ‘ (10 )’(7.8%) . , ‘ ’(26.4%) ‘
1-2 ’(23.3%), ‘ 1-2 ’(13.3%), ‘ 1-2 ’(13.0%), ‘ (10 )’(24.0%) .
, , ,
.
< 5> 1 ,
, ‘
(32.7%)’ . ‘ (19.1%)’
.
< 6>
2012 , 38 39 Session 1.,
9,147 1
2,165 (23.4%) . , 10 2~3 ,
2,308 74.6% , .
1 1 15.7%
, 1 , 19.7%, 10.9% .
< 7>
< 8> 1
, ‘ (1 )’, ‘ (2 )’, ‘
(3 )’ . ‘ (50.7%)’, ‘
(28.6%)’, ‘ (11.1%)’, ‘
(9.6%)’ .
< 9> 1 (1 )
( ) 1 ,
(33.8%) ‘ ’ . ‘ (31.8%)’ . ‘
’ .
< 10> 1 (1 )
1 1 ‘ ’ , 2 ‘ ’, 3 ‘
’ . ‘ ’ 4 ,
,
2012 , 40 41 Session 1.,
< 12> 1
< 13> 1
‘ (31.4%)’ .
‘ (26.6%)’, ‘ (19.7%)’, ‘ (17.1%)’ . , ‘
(23.4%)’, ‘ (27.3%)’, ‘ (14.6%)’, ‘ (7.8%)’, ‘ (27.0%)’ .
‘ (13.0%)’, ‘ (23.0%)’, ‘ (32.0%)’, ‘ (4.3%)’, ‘
(27.4%)’
.
< 11> 1
.
‘ (38.2%)’
. ‘ (20.7%)’, ‘ (10.6%)’, ‘ (9.7%)’ . ,
, 1 ‘ (29.9%)’ 2 ‘
(25.3%)’, ‘ (18.9%)’, ‘ (14.8%)’ .
< 14>
2012 , 42 43 Session 1.,
: 2( ) : 2( ) : A B 30
. . “ 3 , .”
. 2 ,
3 . A
. , A .
: A , . ,
. 1 .
. .
— : ( )/ , , — : ,
: 4( ) : 4 : 4 A “
. .” , A
. A “ , .” .
,
. , , A .
.
.
— : ( )/ / / — : , ,
: 3, ※ , : 3, ※ , : 3
. A B 1 .
, , , ( , ) . B
, . B , , ,
. B , B
. , A
,
.
— : ( ), , , — : ,
: 3, : 3, 10 : A
3 . . 10
2012 , 44 45 Session 1.,
A 10 A
. . A
. A .
.
2 , , CCTV
. . , ‘1 (83%)’
. , ‘ (32.3%)’ ‘
(36.1%)’ , , ,
, , , , .
.
• • • • • ‘ ’ ‘ ’ • ‘ ’• ‘ ’, ‘ ’ • ‘ ’
• ‘ ’ • ‘ ’•
,
.
• • (‘ ’) • , • ( , )
• • • • • , , ,
•
.
• , , , • • • • , , • • , , • , • • • • • •
47: , Session 1.,
, “ ” .
, “ ” .
.
. .
. - .
— Sex/Age: F/9yrs — Education: 3 — Problems:1. , . 2. . 3. , . 4. .
— 1 : ,
,
— 2 : 1 .
.
, , , .
2 2
: ,
2012 , 48 49: , Session 1.,
— 2 11 :
. “ .” ,
.
. ,
. ,
12 . 1
— 3 : 2 3
‘ ’ ‘ ’ . , , , , , ,
— :
— : . .
— : 4-6 . 6 , 3
. .
.
— : . 92 4
— : . . 99 . . ,
— (13 ): 1.
, . - .
, .
. .
. .
, , .
. . . .
. . .
. . . - - -
.
.
2012 , 50 51: , Session 1.,
. . , ,
, .
. . - . . - . .
, . ,
.
. .
, , ( , 1996) ,
, .
. , ,
, .
90 , , 10%(Hodages et al., Perry et al., 1988), 27% (Williams et al., 1996), 31%, 55%, 38% .
. (14.1-70%) ( , 1991; , 1994; , 1997), ( (28.2%) > (23%)),
( (29.6%) > (24%) > (23.8%) > (23.2%)).
- - 90 , . 1997 4 , , 1
, (49%), (38%), (28%),
(40%), (17%), (6%), (32%), (11%), (4%) 15 .
. .
1 1 , 3 , 1, 2, 3
. (29.6%) ( (25.1%), (21.3%)).
. : (29.2%) / (29.7%) /
(31.0%).
. . -
. .
.
. ( , 1997) ,
76.5% . 35.8%, 50.8% , .
.
, : , , , : , : , ,
, : , , , , : .
.
Olweus(1994)
2012 , 52 53: , Session 1.,
. (passive or submissive victim) . ,
. (provocative victim) . ,
.
‘ . . .
.’ , (Egan&Perry, 1998)
. , .
(52.6%) / (41.1%), . (45.4%) / (48.5%) / (52.4%).
, , (1998) (42.9%), (39%), (36.6%), (26.7%), (21.3%), (16%)
. ( , 1997) (40.2%), ( )(33.3%),
( )(36.2%) ,
. , (Olweus, 1994), .
( , 1997).
(83.4%) (40.7%), (18.5%) .
, , , , .
, ( , ) ( , , ) ,
. ,
.
2000 , 1) , 2) , 3)
.
. (1998) , , 10% ,
(43.6%), (23.6%), (21.1%), (20.4%), (19%),
(18%) . . , (32.3%), (25.1%) , (15.5%)
(5.2%) . (1.8%) .
.
(Mynard et al.,2000). -
, Internalizing behavior, Psychosomatic symptoms, Anhedonia, anxiety, depression, ,
, Posttraumatic stress reaction . (Kaltiala-Heino et al.,2000), . , Externalizing behavior, Hyperactivity, Excessive drinking & substance use .
- .
. , Highest in externalizing behavior & hyperactivity, Feeling of ine�ectiveness, Interpersonal problem, School absenteeism, Eating disorder, substance use .
, - .
.
2012 , 54 55: , Session 1.,
, (2000) 1 ,
, . , - (Kaltiala-
Heino et al.,1999), . , risk ,
, risk (Klomek, et al., 2011). ,
bullying behavior , , / (Klomek, et al., 2009).
28 / M/ / , , .
, , washing . . . , ,
. , roommate .
, ‘ ’ .
‘ ’ . 18 , ( : ,
, IOR ). . 2010 ‘ ,
’ . , .
, , .
21 / M/ / , Chronic depression, psychotic episode, ,
. , ( ).
(“ ” ) . 3 ,
. .
, . ( ,
) , . 2011 9
‘ ’ , , . 5 ,
( ).
( , , ), . self-regulation .
, fearful ,
, , episode .
( ), , (
), , ( ), ( ) ,
. (Olweus’s program, She�eld bullying project ).
2 50% / .
- , , , .
, , ,
. , . ,
1:1 , .
2012 , 56 57: , Session 1.,
.
, - .
.
? . .
:
.
— , , , , : .
, ,
— :
— :
— :
— : ‘ , , , , , , , ’
, ‘
’ , .
.
1. — ‘ ’ ( ) , , — ‘ (ANCY)( ) ( , )
— , , ( , , , ,
, , )
. , � ,
, , , ,
— , , ‘ ’ 4
— — , — — — . —
2. , ,
( ) ( ) ( ) ‘ , , ’
( ) ( )
2012 , 58 59: , Session 1.,
— . — ,
3.
. 10
, ,
.
.
,
- .
.
. , , , . , , ,
.
, , ‘ ’ .
(39 ) (35 ) , ,
, .
, , ,
,
.
30 , ,
. ,
.
.
,
. - .
.
( )
1. , , (Neural substrate) :
— 1: Philips Achieva 3.0 Tesla TX MRI (Philips, Eindhoven, the Netherlands)
. parameter : EPI, 40 coronal slices, 5.0 mm thickness, voxel size of 3.1×3.1×5.0 mm, TE=30msec, TR=3000ms, Flip angle=90˚, in-plane resolution=64×64 pixels, �eld of view (FOV)=200×200 mm.
2012 , 60 61: , Session 1.,
SPM(statistical parametric mapping) 5th version , . independent t-test
. FDR<0.05, extent threshold 40
— 2:
7 30 fMRI
fMRI stimulation 1 for empathetic stimulation: cartoona. 3 (Blocked design with three conditions)b. cartoon pictures ,
:
c. , , 30 . 5 7 30
.
fMRI stimulation 2 for emotion , ,
R Rest 30
S / 30
M : 30
R Rest 30
S Empathetic stimulation Cartoon 30
M : 30
fMRI data the Brain Voyager software package (BVQX 1.9, Brain Innovation, Maastricht, �e Netherlands) . fMRI time series BVQX 3D data , Talairach space . fMRI time series time correction, 3D motion correction, spatially smoothed using Gaussian kernel with an FWHM of 6mm and temporally smoothed using Gaussian kernel of 4s using algorithms provided by BVQX . fMRI data general linear model ( / )
2. ( ) 12 (3 ) :
— (Toronto Empathy Questionnaire, German Questionnaire for assessing a�ective and cognitive empathy in children & adolescents)
.
active , waiting list
2012 , 62
— 12 , 12
— 12
,
—
.
.
, .
, - - / .
.
.
- , . ,
. ,
. .
Session 2.
67 ,
Session 2.
18 . . 1994 ,
. 6 .
. . .
······. .
.
18 . 2005 , .
. . .
. , , ,
. , ,
, , . .
, . .
. .
. .
, .
,
. . .
.
. . , ,
,
( )
2012 , 68 69 ,
Session 2.
, . .
( ) , .
2000 . 2000 10
. 5-6 .
‘ ’ . . 2 4
(?) . . 9 10
2-30km . 2 .
. .
? , ,
……. , !
, 3 . ,
, , , ,
.
, !
, , , , , , , ……. .
, . . , ···
. . , .
, ! . ? . , , … .
……. , , , .
! , …….
.
.
. .
. .
.
( ) .
2003 . 37 5 36,000 .
. , .
10 , . . ,
. ,
2012 , 70 71 ,
Session 2.
. 1 , 6 .
. , .
, . .
, .
. . ,
.
“ . .” “ .” “ , .” “ .” “ , .” “ , . .”
. , , .
.
. .
. 90% . , .
, .
. , .
. . .
.
. .
. , 4 1
. , .
3 , . 10
.
.
( ) .
2006 2009 5 .
. . 10
. . 2 .
.
. .
.
.
. ‘ ’
. , ,
. .
. . .
.
2012 , 72 73 ,
Session 2.
.
. .
. . 1
. . 1 . .
. .
.
5 . . .
2 30 .
. .
. .
.
. . .
.
.
.
. 10 , ,
.
● . 12 .
. , , ······.
.
, . .
.
.
.
. ,
, .
.
2 . . .
······ . ,
, .
, ‘ ’ ‘
’ . . .
‘ , ’ . , ‘ , ······ 3 .’ ‘
.’ .
.
2012 , 74 75 ,
Session 2.
. , , .
, , .
. .
.
. , , ,
. , , , .
, EXIT .
. .
. . 2
. . . .
? , . . .
.
12 . .
“ 24 .
. , .”
. , . , , , ,
, ‘ ’ , . , , , , ,
, ……. .
. . , ,
, .
, . .
. ,
.
. . .
, , .
. .
77 Session 2.
. .
, .
,
.
, ,
‘ ’, ‘ ’ . ,
,
.
90 .
,
.
. .
. , . ,
, ,
.
, .
.
2012 , 78 79 Session 2.
, , .
, …
( ) 2009 , ,
, .
3 ,
1, 2 .
,
.
. ,
.
.
. .
.
, .
,
.
.
, , , , .
, , ‘
( , 2004 )’ ‘
.’ .
, , , , .
, . ,
, , . .
4 ‘ ’ ‘ ’ .
.
, .
2006 , 3 1 46 2009 .
.
.
. ‘ , , ’ , ,
. .
2012 , 80 81 Session 2.
.
.
, .
, .
· ·
.
‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’ .
‘ ’ . 2
.
‘ ’ .
. ,
, ‘ ’ .
‘ ’ , , .
, . ,
. 3 6
.
,
, . ,
, .
.
. , .
‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’
.
.
.
. . , , , , ,
.
‘ ’ ‘ ’
.
● , . . .
.
●
2012 , 82 83 Session 2.
,
.
, 1 6 . ,
, ‘ ’, .
● ADHD . . 1
. . TV .
, ,
.
. . ‘ ’ . , .
. . .
● 1 , . . .
. . , , ,
00 , 00 , .
●
.
● ‘ ’
.
● “ , ?” .
. ··· . ,
. , ,
. ! ! ?
●
.
● , . .
, ··· . ··· .
● . . ? ? .
. ~
~~!! ^^ ··· ··· ~ ~~!! .
● , . . . ,
. .
● , . ? .
2012 , 84 85 Session 2.
2 6 ‘ ’ ‘ ’, ‘ .’ .
? ‘ ’
. , .
, .
, .
.
.
, , , . .
, .
.
‘ ’ .
.
, , , .
.
.
.
87 Session 2.
“ ”, . 21 “ ”
.
. , .
, , .
, ,
. .
.
.
• (drama) (theatre) • • , • ( , )• . .• (cf. , , , )• • , , , ,
, ,
• “
, , .”
* . (cf. ) .
( )
2012 , 88 89 Session 2.
1. , ‘ ’
.2. , .3.
.
4. .
! ! , , ,
/
, , .
2012 , 90
● .
● . .
.
● .
● ,
.
.
● . .
.
2012 , 92 93 Session 2.
: ?
· . .
, .
. .
, , , , ,
. . ,
, . .
. ,
. , , .
. , ,
. , . , , , ,
.
, 1995 , .
2005 12 29 ( · · , 2010).
, . .
.
. .
, , , , .
, ,
.
.
. .
.
‘2011 ’ Patteson(2011) (�e Royal Conservatory) ‘Learning �rough the Arts(LTTA,
)’ . . , .
, . , ,
. .
. ,
, , , .
, . . , .
. , .
.
,
. .
2012 , 94 95 Session 2.
.
?
. , .
. .
, .
, . .
, .
.
. , .
. ,
. .
, , ,
.
.
. ,
.
. . < 1>
‘ ’ . .
- 20
-
‘ ’
< 1> : Australia Kensington Public School (2004)
2012 , 96 97 Session 2.
.
. STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and
Mathematics) , . . ,
, .
.
( ) . , .
.
.
. , , , .
, , .
Green(2001) ‘ ’ ,
. .
. LTTA( ) 1994
60 .
· · , .
, , , ,
· · · · (Eisner, 1974; Greene, 1995; Welch & Greene, 1995; Csikszentmihalyi, 1996;
Elster, 2001; Patteson, 2010; Collard, 2011).
. /
( , 2011) , ,
. (PSI) ,
.
. ( , 2011)
.
( ) .
, .
.
4 , 4 1 . 16
4, 5, 6 , 2011 6 11 , .
.
/
/ - .
.
. .
.
2012 , 98 99 Session 2.
/
< 2> / - . , 3.67
3.77 . 3.56 3.66
.
, , , , 5 , 6 , , ,
. .
5~6 , , ,
.
.
.( , )
. . ,
. .(
, )
. 00
.( , )
, .
.
, , / 80 ( 30 )
. , , .
‘ ,’ ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’
.( , )
,
.
4 3.69 3.76 t=1.429 3.82 3.77 t=0.801
5 3.72 3.82 t=2.013* 3.43 3.56 t=1.265
6 3.61 3.71 t=2.013* 3.45 3.65 t=1.917
3.66 3.79 t=2.941** 3.56 3.64 t=0.978
3.68 3.75 t=1.594 3.58 3.69 t=1.377
3.70 3.77 t=1.964 3.62 3.70 t=1.274
3.49 3.76 t=3.131** 3.36 3.50 t=0.809
3.94 4.08 t=1.224 3.61 3.84 t=0.584
3.66 3.76 t=3.034** 3.60 3.65 t=0.876
3.35 3.48 t=0.627 2.99 3.84 t=2.665*
( ) 3.67 (997) 3.77 (1002) t=3.112** 3.56 (266) 3.66 (261) t=1.702
< 2> / * p < .05, ** p < .01
2012 , 100 101 Session 2.
.
. ‘ ’ ‘ ’
. ( , )
1~2 .
.
.( , )
/
< 3> / - . , 3.34 3.42 . 3.32 3.32 ,
.
, , , , 6 , , ,
. .
6 , , ,
.
,
. ,
. ADHD ,
, , .
00 , . ,
‘ ’ . .( , )
5 .
. . .
.( , )
4 3.31 3.39 t=1.594 3.49 3.45 t=0.387
5 3.42 3.46 t=0.811 3.24 3.24 t=0.008
6 3.31 3.42 t=2.505* 3.24 3.26 t=0.277
3.26 3.39 t=3.187** 3.23 3.27 t=0.528
3.43 3.47 t=0.952 3.42 3.39 t=0.434
3.37 3.42 t=1.777 3.35 3.38 t=0.555
3.20 3.41 t=2.594* 3.27 3.13 t=0.852
3.55 3.68 t=1.182 3.56 3.26 t=1.287
3.33 3.42 t=2.818** 3.34 3.38 t=0.018
3.07 3.09 t=0.121 2.93 3.16 t=0.749
( ) 3.34 (1012) 3.42(1015) t=2.822** 3.32 (276) 3.32 (266) t=0.042
< 3> / * p < .05, ** p < .01
2012 , 102 103 Session 2.
,
. , .
, .
, (Prosocial behavior) .
, , .
. .
, .
. . , ,
.
, , , .
, . , ,
. . . . ,
.
. ,
.
.( , )
.
.
.( , )
:
. ,
,
. , .
.
, , .
, , , , , , . ,
. , . ,
.
, .
.
. , , , ( · · , 2006).
, .
2012 , 104 105 Session 2.
· · (2010). : . . 40. 205-233.
· · (2006). . : . (2011). - , . . · · (2011). .
. · · · (2011). -
. . Collard, P.(2011). Delivering creativity: Turning �eory into Practive. 2011
(pp. 35-42).Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity, �ow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York:
HarperCollins.Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. New York:
Teachers College Press. Green, M. (2001). Variations on a Blue Guitar. New York: Teachers College Press. p.19. Eisner, E.W. (1974). Is the artists-in-the-schools program e�ective? Art Education, 27(2), 19-23.Patteson, A. (2010). Learning �rough the Arts: Music Champion program evaluation research report, year 1.
Available from the Royal Conservatory, Toronto.Patteson, A.(2011). Learning through the arts: an international education program transforming lives and
communities globally. 2011 (pp. 61-74).Welch, N. & Greene, A. (1995). Schools, communities and the arts: A research compendium. Tempe, AZ:
Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Arizona State University.
,
Session 3.
109 Session 3.,
· .
, .
.
2 6 , , “ ”
. .
2 .
3 .
. .
. . ,
. . .
‘ ’(‘10.7), (‘11.4) , , ,
. ,
, 6,531 4,263 , , , , , , , / 8
.
2010 3 , / 65 , ,
148 , 4 . 150 ,
20 , , . , (71 )
, , (500 )
2012 , 110
.
(23 ) · ( , , /
) , , 13 (’11.12), ( , ,
) (’11.10, 21 ), ( ) 10 200
(10 ) .
‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’
? . ,
,
.
· .
, , , ,
. ,
‘ ’ , . · ·
.
2012 , 112 113 Session 3.,
.
.
, .
. , ,
. ,
.
.
, , . , ,
. , .
, .
“ ” ‘ ’ .
, . ,
.
. , .
/ ,
ADHD , , .
, ( , , ) .
. ,
. , ,
.
115‘ ’ !Session 3.,
. . “
· · ‥ , .” . ‘ ’ .
.
‘
’ . ,
, . , ‘
’ . ‘ ’ .
.
20 .
, , , , ,
. .
1. 1990 ‘IT 10~20% ’ ‘
’ ‘ ’ . ‘ ’ ‘ ’ ,
‘ ’ ‘ ’ , ‘ ’ ‘ ’ , ,
‘ ’ ‘IT ’ . ,
, ‘ (
‘ ’ !
‘ ’
2012 , 116 117‘ ’ !Session 3.,
) ( )’ , ‘ ’ .
, ‘ ’ .
2. 1990 , ‘ ’ . 7 ‘
’ . 2000 ‘ ’ · ,
. ‘ · · ’ ,
‘ · ’ ( ) .
21 , . ‘ ·
( ) ’ .
3. ‘ · · ’ , ,
.
, , . ‘River Boy’
Tim Bowler “ . , .
.
.” . , ‘ ’
, , .
‘ ,
’ .
1. 7
‘ · ’ . 2009
‘ ’, ‘ ’ ‘ ’ ‘ ’ , ‘ ’ , 6 ( ‘ / ’ , 1 -2 , 2-2, 3-1)
. ,
.
2. ‘ · ’ 1990 ,
. .
· ,
.
3. ‘ ’ · ‘ ’ ‘ ’ · ‘ ’ .
‘ ’ · ‘ ’ 12 ,
‘ ’ . ‘ ’ · ‘ ’ · ‘ ’
‘ ’
, , .
4. · ‘ · · ’ ‘
’ ‘ ’ ,
. 2007 6 ‘ · ’
. ‘ ’ , ‘ ’
, ‘ ’ .
2012 , 118 119‘ ’ !Session 3.,
5. ·
. ‘ ’ ‘ · · ’ ‘ · · · / · · · · ’
.
. ‘ · · ’ · ,
.
6. ,
· , ‘ ’ . ·
. , ,
.
.
· ,
.
‘ ’ ‘ 10, 20 ’, ‘ 30, 40 ’
‘ ’ .
“ ( ) , .(John
Dewey)” , ‘ ’, ‘ ’ ,
,
.
121 Session 3.,
.
. ‘ ’
, , , .
,
, , . ,
.
. .
.
Merten(1994) , ,
.
.
21 (meritocracy) (competition) . , ,
? ( ) .
(symbolic violence) ?
? - , -
(2012.1.4), [ ]
, (
)
2012 , 122
.
.
,
Wimmer(2006) .
‘ ’ . ,
, .
, , .
, , , ·
.
‘ ’, ‘ ’
.
. .
, ?
.
2012. 9. 27 [ ] 14:30 – 17:10
,
2012 , 126 127
.
.
.
.
.
(160 ) · ·
Opening 25
14:30-14:40 10 , ,
14:40-14:50 10
14:50-14:55 5 , ( )
Session 1 45 ,
14:55-15:00 5
15:00-15:20 20 , — —
,
15:20-15:40 20 “ ”— “ ”
—
,
15:40-15:50 10
Session 2 30
15:50-16:20 30 — — —
, ,
,
Discussion 50 ,
16:20-17:05 45 ·
—
— , — , — , TF— , — , — ,
17:05-17:10 5
,
Session 1.
131 Session 1.,
, “ ” .
, “ ” . , ,
. . ,
. ,
.
, , ( , 1996) ,
, . ,
, . , , .
90 , , 10% (Hodages et al., Perry et al., 1988), 27% (Williams et al., 1996), 31%,
55%, 38% . . , 14.1-
70%( , 1991; , 1994; , 1997), , (28.2%) > (23%), .
(29.6%) > (24%) > (23.8%) > (23.2%).
- - 90 ,
. 1997 4 , , 1 (49%), (38%), (28%),
(40%), (17%), (6%), (32%), (11%), (4%) 15 .
.
2012 , 132 133
, ’ . ,
, .
(52.6%) / (41.1%), : (45.4%) / (48.5%) / (52.4%).
, , (1998) (42.9%), (39%),
(36.6%), (26.7%), (21.3%), (16%) . ( , 1997), (40.2%), ( )(33.3%),
( )(36.2%) , .
, (Olweus, 1994), ‘
’ .
.( , 1997).
(83.4%), (40.7%), (18.5%) , . , ,
, , .
, ( , ) ( , , ) ,
. ,
. 2000
, 1) , 2) , 3) .
. (1998)
1 1 , 3 , 1, 2, 3 .
(29.6%) ( (25.1%), (21.3%)). .
: (29.2%) / (29.7%) / (31.0%).
.
. - ,
. , ,
. ,
.
. ( , 1997)
76.5% . 35.8%, 50.8% ,
, .
. 1) ( , , ), 2) ( ), 3) ( , , ),
4) ( , , , , 5) ( , )
. Olweus, 1994
. (passive or submissive victim) . ,
. (provocative victim) . ,
.
‘ . . .
.’ , (Egan&Perry, 1998) ‘ , , ,
Session 1.,
2012 , 134 135
. , .( ) , ,
,( ), .( ) ( )
. .
(Olweus’s program, She�eld bullying project ). 2
, 50% / .
- , , , , . ,
, , . ,
. , 1:1 , ,
. ,
, .
, , - .
.
? . .
:
.
, , 10% ,
(43.6%), (23.6%), (21.1%), (20.4%), (19%),
(18%) . . , (32.3%), (25.1%) , (15.5%)
(5.2%) . (1.8%) .
.
(Mynard et al.,2000). , -
, , (Internalizing behavior), (Psychosomatic symptoms), (Anhedonia), (anxiety), (depression), , , (Posttraumatic stress reaction) . (Kaltiala-
Heino et al.,2000), . , (Externalizing behavior), (Hyperactivity), (Excessive drinking & substance use) .
- . , ,
. , (Highest in externalizing behavior), (hyperactivity), (Feeling of ine�ectiveness), (Interpersonal
problem), (School absenteeism), (Eating disorder), (substance use) .
, -
. , (2000) 1 ,
, , .
, - (Kaltiala-Heino et al.,1999), .
, , ,
(Klomek, et al., 2011). , bullying behavior , ,
· (Klomek, et al., 2009)
Session 1.,
2012 , 136 137
‘ ’ .
. .
‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’, ‘ ’
. .
?
.
. .
.
, . ,
. ‘ ’ .
. , , (Insula) , .
. ( , )
. .
. ‘ (theory of mind: TOM)’ .
. 3-4 , , (myelination)
. 20 . 20 .
?
. .
‘ ’ . . .
. . .
.
. . . “
. . .”
. . ( ) . .
. ?
. 1 8000 , 3000 .
, . , , ,
. , 800 . .
. .
.
. ‘ (Spindle cell)’ ,
( , insula, ) . . ,
. , . .
?
Session 1.,
2012 , 138 139
. .
, .
. “ , , ?”, “ , ”, “
.”
. .
. . . .
“ , , . ( )
. ( )
. ( ) .”
, .
‘ ’ . , . .
. .
. ,
. .
.
.
? .
, .
, . (PFC: Prefrontal Cortex)
, . . .
. .
. . , .
. (ACC: anterio cingulated cortex) .
.
, , , .
‘ ’ , (mirroring) . .
, . , ? .
. . , .
. .
. . ‘ ’ . .
. .
, . .
- , , , , . .
. ‘ ?’ ‘ ?’ ‘ ?’
Session 1.,
2012 , 140
, , . , ,
, . ,
, .
, - - / .
. .
, - , . , .
, .
.
“ ”
2012 , 142 143 “ ”Session 1.,
“ , ” 2012 2 “ ”
.
, <Creative Britain>, <Creative America>
1990 . 21 , , “ (creativity)” (excellency),
(accessibility), (quality of life) .
(communication), (collaboration) (sense,
sensibility), . ,
.
" " ,
, , . "
, " , , , .
.
,
2000 . , , . - . ,
( ), ( , ), , , - 2012 8 ( , , ,
, , , ) 4,600 .
, ,
, . , , /
, , , .
, .
· .
" , , " ,
, , ( ) .
" , "
, ( , ), ( , ), ( , ) .
, ,
.
, 2000 100 , 2005 .
, , .
.
2012 , 144 145
, ,
( ) ( ), ( ) .
.
.
. , , ,
.
. , .
, .
.
. ·
.
“ ” . “ ” ,
, . ,
.
.
, , , , , , , , ,
, , ( , , ), , , , , , ,
, , , , , .
.
.
, , , , , , , , .
, , , , , , ,
.
759
637
193
157
17
30
289
251
85
1
27
108
5
2559
< 2>
“ ”Session 1.,
Session 2.
149 1.Session 2.
! !
1.
! ! !
!
8 ! . ! ‘ ?’
! ‘ ~’ ! 8 .
?
, ‘ ’ .
. ?
. , “ ~” , “ ~
.
.
! ! . ,
. ! ? ? ,
?
“ ” ,
. . !
. .
2012 , 150 151
2. !
< > . , , , ,
‘ ’ . < ! ( ) ! ! ! !-
> . 1 2 .
1. , ,
, 2. , , , 3. ? 4. ! , ,
, , , 5. ! ! , , ,
< ( ) ! ! ! !- > 16 1 2
,
. . .
1. ! !
. .
‘ ’ . ,
. . .
.
? ?
. ‘ ’ ,
, . .
. 1 .
.
. . .
“ ~ 00 ! ~” . . “00 ~ ?
?” “ ! !
~ ~” . ,
. ,
. ,
. .
. .
? .
1.Session 2.
2012 , 152 153
2. !
< > . , , , ,
‘ ’ . < ! ( ) ! ! ! !-
> . 1 2 .
1. , ,
, 2. , , , 3. ? 4. ! , ,
, , , 5. ! ! , , ,
< ( ) ! ! ! !- > 16 1 2
,
. . .
1. ! !
. .
‘ ’ . ,
. . .
.
? ?
. ‘ ’ ,
, . .
. 1 .
.
. . .
“ ~ 00 ! ~” . . “00 ~ ?
?” “ ! !
~ ~” . ,
. ,
. ,
. .
. .
? .
1.Session 2.
2012 , 154 155
. ,
.
1 (80 ) 3
1• ‘ ’
• ‘ ! · · ’
2• ‘ ’
, ,
•
3• ‘ ’, ‘
< > 1 2
3 . 3 .
2 ‘ ’ .
. .
? 3 .
“ ! , . !
3. < > — ! ! .
, ‘ ’ .
.
1.Session 2.
2012 , 156 157
?” .
“ ! ! !
. ?” .
, .
. ?
! ! .
4. ? ! ? ! .
. , , ,
, , , .
? .
. .
. ‘ ’
.
?
,
. , .
. .
‘ ’
. , , !
.
.
.
. ! ,
.
1.Session 2.
159 2.Session 2.
2.
2008 4 ‘ ’ 2012 5 .
‘ ’
. ,
, . .
. . .
. ‘ ’, ‘ ’ , .
, , ‘ ’ .
, .
, . ,
, .
.
‘ ’ . 80% · ‘ ’
.
.
.
2012 , 160 161
80 .
. , , .
.
. . . . .
, , . . , . 2012 , 10
. 5 , .
. .
· .
‘ ’
, .
. ,
, . .
.
. 100%
. .
. ?
, .
“ .”
2.Session 2.
2012 , 162 163
옷에 묻은 때 보란 듯이
깨끗하게 빨아주는 세탁기
나의 나쁜 때는 세탁 안 해 주니
세탁기 안으로 들어가
하얗게 세탁되고 싶다
하루 종일 냄새 배인 양말
깨끗하게 빨아주는 세탁기
계속 나쁜 길로만 가려고 하는
나의 발은 세탁 안 해 주나
검은 발도 하얗게 세탁하고 싶다
하루 종일 무언가를 탐하다가
나쁜 버릇만 맨 손
이 손도 깨끗하게 세탁 안 해 주나
하루 종일 나쁜 생각만 하려들고
어둠만 가득 밴 나의 머리
이 머리도 환하게 세탁 안 해 주나
더운 눈물에 꽃잎 넣고
나를 세탁하고 싶다.
덜컹 으 으 윽
육중한 철문 네 개를 통과해야
만나는 시를 쓰는 수인들
격자 철창 출석부를 넘기면
빗금으로 얼룩진 수인번호와
죄명이 낮달처럼 흐릿하다
살인
살인 살인
살인
그리고 폭력과 절도
검은 수인번호와 그늘진 이름들이
언 바닥에서 껌벅거린다
가슴속에 울화를 시로 삭히기 위하여
큰 산 하나 허물며 비유를 한다
그럴 때마다 실 끊어진 방패연처럼
머리를 흔들며 추락하는 수인들
내가 시를 만드는 것이 아니라
시가 나를 만드는 것이다 라고
나를 가두고 나서야
세상이 넓게 보인다고
뜨겁게 가슴을 허물어 내린다
수인들은 담 안에 갇혀 있으면서도
다시 담 밖에 갇혀 있다고
감방에서 죄의 시간을 도려내면서
열루의 시를 읊조린다
덜컹 으 으 윽
육중한 철문을 나서는 찰라
세상이 담밖에 갇히고 만다
나는 오늘도 햇빛 가득한 시의 가방을 들고
감옥으로 향한다.
2.Session 2.
2012 , 164 165
화장실 한쪽 구석
양동이에 받아놓은 물 위에
창살틈을 헤집고
달이 내려와 있습니다
덜컥 갇혔습니다
소변을 보고 바가지로 물을 뜨니
물을 뜬 만큼의 자리에 달은
가라앉아 더 깊이 잠기고
내 몸 속 어디엔가 박혀 있었던
색이 바랜 노란 더러움은
달이 내어준 물에 희석돼 씻겨 갑니다
내게 주어진 시간이
양동이의 물처럼 줄어들고 있다는 생각을 하면
저 달도 더 가라앉기 전에 건져내어
넓은 바다에 놓아주고 싶습니다.
2.Session 2.
,
Discussion
169
2011— : 30 — : (10 ), (6 ), (5 ), (4
), (4 ), (1 )
2012— : 44 — : (25 ), (9 ), (8 ), (2
)
?— 54.8%
14.2%
—
, , 2011
Discussion ,
4.8%
9.4%
31%
32%
22.8%
3.64
3.57
3 3.45
2012 , 170 171
—
— , ,
—
—
— >
> > >
— ‘ ’
,
— — — — — — — , ,
— — —
14.7%
11.2%
34.5%
15.6%
18.5%
5.5%
(%)
50
30
10
3.3 3.35 3.4 3.45 3.5 3.55 3.6 3.65 3.7
Discussion ,
173
.
.
.
‘21 , .’ ( ) . . (85%) . , · .
‘ ’( ) . 2012 ‘
(TIE: �eatre In Education) ’ . 46 , · ·
( 80%) 104 .
.
. ‘ ’ ‘ ’ , ‘ ’ ,
( , ) .
.
, (joker) (actor-teacher) .
. ‘ ’ .
.
.
. , ,
—
TF 1, 2
— Discussion ,
2012 , 174 175
. .
(Bruner, 1996: 35, 85).
, . ,
.
.
,
. .
. ·
. , ,
.
.
.
.
,
.
‘ , .’( ) ( , ) · ( · ) .
.
.
. ,
21 .
,
.( ) ‘ (self)’ ,
— Discussion ,
177
.
. � � (dramatization) � �
.
‘ ’ .
.
,
.
2010 4 .( : ,
)
(20 / )
(20 / )
Discussion ,
1 1 4 2 3 14 7
11 6 8 6 0 5 1
6 3 5 1 2 8 2
1 1 1 3 6 12 10
2012 , 178
(20 / )
,
.
. .
. .
. 60% .
. Creative Partnership
. 3 7 10 .
.
.
.
, , , ,
, ,
.
6 5 5 3 2 5 0
3 2 1 1 8 10 3
2012 , 180 181
「 - 」 「 “ ”」
. 21 ( ) .
‘ ’ . ,
.
. . , ,
! . .
. “ ”
. “ ” “ ” .
. 2000 ,
, ( ) .
, , ,
, . .
,
. .
, , , , , ,
. .
.
Discussion ,
. ( )
.
. 2,559 , .
,
.
, .
.
. ,
, · · .
,
.
‘ , , ’
.
.
183 Discussion ,
.
.
. .
.
.
. , ‘ ’ . , .
. . .
‘ ’ . ‘ ’ ‘ ’ .
. .
.
. . .
. ,
.
. 50
. .
2012 , 184
.
.
. .
