VIIIPt6
Transcript of VIIIPt6
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 1/106
Kingdom of Saudi ArabiaMinistry of Communications
Highway Materials Manual
Volume III
Part 6 Acceptance by Certification
and
Laboratory Standardization
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 2/106
6-1
Materials Acceptance by Certification
Introduction
All materials shall be inspected and/or tested, and accepted by the Engineer before incorporation into the work.
Frequently, materials are used in constructing a project which are fabricated or manufactured at plants or locations far
removed from the project. The quantities involved may not warrant sending a project inspector to the plants to sample, test
or otherwise inspect the material. In these cases the material may either be accepted by a Certificate of Guarantee (Fig. 1)prepared by the supplier and based on tests by or for him, or samples can be taken and tested after the material arrives on the
project. The second option is restricted for many items as the tests involved may be very specialized and beyond the
capabilities of the laboratory facilities available to the Engineer. Special arrangements may be required when these materials
are specified on a project.
Even though a Certificate of Guarantee is available for a product and it is recognized as the primary basis for acceptance of
the product, it must also be recognized that final acceptance is in the hands of the Engineer. To that end, a visual check of
all materials received on a project must be made to verify that no discernible damage has occurred in shipment or that no
visible flaws were missed in prior inspections.
Those items of major importance which are used in normal highway construction and may fall in the category discussed
above are:
1. Portland Cement
2. Asphalt Materials
3. Reinforcing Steel
4. Structural Steel
5. Precast Concrete Pipe
6. Miscellaneous Metal Products
7. Lime
Methods for documenting that only those materials meeting the required specifications are incorporated into the work are
described individually in the following sections.
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 3/106
6-2
Certificate of Guarantee
The undersigned certify that the following material for Project No. ____________________________ meets the governing
specifications of the Ministry for the material involved:
Material ______________________________________________________________________________________________
Quantity ______________________________________________________________________________________________
I.D. No. (Silo, Heat, etc.) _________________________________________________________________________________
Mill Test No. ____________________________________________Date __________________________________________
Consignee _____________________________________________________________________________________________
Date of Shipment _______________________________________ Time __________________________________________
For the Producer
Signed by _______________________________________________
Title ___________________________________________________
Date ___________________________________________________
For the Supplier
Signed by ______________________________________________
Title ___________________________________________________
Date ___________________________________________________
Fig. 1. Example of Certificate of Guarantee
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 4/106
6-3
Certification of Portland Cement
A. Introduction
Portland cement is the finely pulverized product resulting from the calcination and subsequent grinding of an artificial
mixture of properly proportioned argillaceous and calcareous materials. It has definite chemical composition varying within
comparatively narrow limits. The physical properties of strength development, setting time and workability are related not
only to the chemical composition but also to the fineness of grind of the cement.
Portland cement as it is manufactured is generally identified by storage silo or bin and date. As the silo or bin is being filled,
routine samples are taken and when tested constitute a Mill Test Analysis for that silo or bin. All shipments from storage,
whether by bulk or sacks are to be identified as coming from a particular silo or bin and certified Mill Test reports are to
accompany the shipment. See Fig. 1. for an example of a certified notice of cement shipment and Fig. 2. for a typical mill
analysis.
B. On-Site Inspection
As each shipment of portland cement is received at the job site, the Inspector shall verify that the shipment is identified with
a specific silo or bin of cement and that certified Mill Test Analyses have been received for all material in the shipment.
Check the cement for any hard lumps. Any cement that has been stored on the job for more than three months should be
checked very carefully and retested before permitting its use if there is any evidence of caking or improper storage. Be sure
that only the type of cement specified for any particular segment of work is used. Sample each shipment according to theSampling and Testing Frequency Guide of Part I of this manual.
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 5/106
6-4
Certified Notice of Cement Shipment
The following cement was shipped this date:
Type of Cement _______________________ Net Mass ________________________________________
Mill Test Number ______________________ Silo/Bin _________________________________________
Date _________________________________ B/L Number _____________________________________
Time _________________________________ Hopper Number___________________________________
Delivery Vehicle License Number
We certify that this material meets the physical and chemical requirements of the governing specifications of the Ministry of
Communications.
Cement Supplier:
Location ________________________________________
Signature ________________________________________
Title ____________________________________________
Cement Producer:
Location ________________________________________
Signature ________________________________________
Title ____________________________________________
Date ____________________________________________
Project No. _______________________________________
Distribution: ____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________
Fig. 1. Example of Notice of Cement Shipment
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 6/106
6-5
Mill Test Analysis
Name of Company _______________________
Location ______________________________
Date __________________________________
No. ___________________________________
The following is a certified analysis for portland cement, Type ________________________, manufactured
and identified as .(date) (silo, bin, lot)
Chemical Analysis
Test Result Specification
SiO2 __________________ ____________________
Al2O3 __________________ ____________________
Fe2O3 __________________ ____________________MgO ___________________ _____________________
SO3 __________________ ____________________
Loss on Ignition ___________________ _____________________
Insoluble Residue ___________________ _____________________
C3S __________________ ____________________
C2S __________________ ____________________
C3A ___________________ _____________________
C4AF ___________________ _____________________
Na2O + 0.658 K2O ___________________ _____________________
Physical Analysis
Air Content ___________________ _____________________
Fineness ___________________ _____________________
Soundness ___________________ _____________________
Setting Time, Vicat
Initial ___________________ _____________________
Final ___________________ _____________________
Strength1 day ___________________ _____________________
3 days ___________________ _____________________
7 days ___________________ _____________________
The above are true and correct results of tests on record with the company.
Signed______________________________________
Title _______________________________________
Fig. 2. Mill Test Analysis for Portland Cement
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 7/106
6-6
Certification of Asphalt Materials
A. Introduction
Asphalt materials normally used in highway construction are of three basic types:
1. Asphalt cement, or paving asphalt,
2. Liquid, or cut-back, asphalts, and
3. Asphalt emulsions.Asphalt cement is also known as penetration grade asphalt with the various grades identified or classified according to
penetration obtained when tested in accordance with MRDTM 404 with the lower the penetration, the harder the asphalt.
Liquid asphalts are composed of base asphalt cements which are diluted, or cutback with various petroleum solvents. They
are identified first by the type of solvent used arid secondly by viscosity of the liquid asphalt as determined when tested
according to MRDTM 421. If a naptha or gasoline type solvent is used the liquid asphalt is identified as an RC grade arid if
a kerosene type solvent is used, the liquid asphalt is an MC grade. There is also an SC grade available, but it is not presently
used in Saudi Arabia and has very limited use elsewhere.
Emulsified asphalts are emulsions of asphalt cement in water with a small amount of an emulsifying agent and stabilizer.
The two primary types of emulsions are anionic and cationic with electro-positively charged asphalt particles. In each type
there are a number of grades which vary in their viscosity and setting times.
During the normal production of asphalt materials, the refinery will blend the basic stock with the required cutter stocks or
blending oils to produce the type and grade of asphalt material desired. When blended the material is then placed in storage
tanks according to type and grade. During placement routine test samples are taken for quality control and to insure
compliance with specification requirements. Based on these quality control tests, the producer is able to certify that asphalt
materials supplied by him will conform to the specifications for the type of material desired. Accompanying each shipment
should be a certificate of compliance similar to that shown in Fig. 1. The results of the quality control tests upon which the
certification of compliance is based shall be available at the request of the Engineer.
B. On-Site Inspection
There are many types and grades of asphalt materials available and it is important that the materials received on a project be
those ordered or required for the work being done. A certificate of compliance must accompany each shipment and must bechecked for type and grade. When the shipment is received on the project be sure that it is placed in the proper on-site
storage according to type and grade. This is important not only to insure against contamination but also from a safety stand-
point. Contamination should be guarded against as much as possible. The same tanker trucks are frequently used to haul
consecutive loads of different materials and must be completely emptied after each delivery to prevent contamination of the
next load. In a similar manner, it is common to use diesel oil or other solvent for cleaning and flushing of tanks, lines and
pumps after discharging the asphalt materials. Any solvent used in this operation must be removed before loading the next
material. Only a few liters of solvent contaminating a tank full of asphalt can adversely affect the properties of that asphalt.
Sample asphalt materials in accordance with the Sampling and Testing Frequency Guide of Part I of this manual.
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 8/106
6-7
Certificate of Compliance For Asphalt Materials
On __________________19____, at __________a.m. or p.m. the following shipment of asphalt for use on
Project Number ______________________was made:
1. Grade of asphalt ___________________ 2. Truck/Trailer No. _______________________
3. Total Mass, kg: Tare ________________ 4. Volume: Gross Liters ____________________
Net_________________ Net Liters @ 15.5C ________________________
5. Temperature of load, C ______________ 6. Shipment No. __________________________
7. Consignee and delivery point ___________________________________________________
We certify that this material conforms to the specifications of the Ministry of Communications for the grade
reported above.
Signed for Producer_____________________________________________________________
Title _________________________________________________________________________
Producer _____________________________________________________________________
Location ______________________________________________________________________
Distribution:
MOC ________________________________________________________________________
Project _______________________________________________________________________
Producer _____________________________________________________________________
Fig. 1. Certificate of Compliance for Asphalt Materials
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 9/106
6-8
Reinforcing Steel
A. Introduction
It is necessary that a chain of identification be developed for reinforcing steel in order that individual pieces of steel as
placed in the structure may be traced back to the heat of steel as rolled and tested by the rolling mill. In order to accomplish
this, the steel fabricator furnishing reinforcing steel must accompany each shipment of steel to the project with a certificate
which includes the following information:
Name and location of the steel rolling mill,Manufacturing process,
Heat number(s),
Size(s),
Specification,
Copies of mill test analyses for chemical and physical tests,
and
Consignee and destination of shipment.
An example of reinforcing steel certification is shown in Fig. 1. and a typical Mill Test Analysis is shown in Fig. 2.
B. On-Site Inspection
Upon arrival of a shipment of reinforcing steel on the job site the Inspector shall review the Reinforcing Steel Certification,Mill Test Analysis and other Shipping documents accompanying the shipment to insure that all the steel as placed in the
structure meets the specifications and can be identified by Heat Number. Check the steel for excessive rust or mill scale and
pitting or surface defects. Surface rust or mill scale are acceptable provided the unit mass of the bar does not drop below the
specified value when the rust and mill scale are removed by hand brushing with a wire brush and further provided that when
the rust is removed there is no evidence of pitting into the metal. Also to be checked for is evidence of rough or careless
handling which resulted in serious nicks in the surface of the bar. The yield strength of a bar is significantly reduced at the
location of any surface irregularity put into the bar after cooling from the rolling process. Sample reinforcing steel according
to the Sampling and Testing Frequency Guide of Part I of this manual.
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 10/106
6-9
Reinforcing Steel Certification
Supplier
(Name) _______________________________________________________________________
(Location) ____________________________________________________________________
Manufacturer
(Name) _______________________________________________________________________
(Location) ____________________________________________________________________
(Process) _____________________________________________________________________
Heat Number _________________________ Supplier's ID Number ________________________
Delivery Vehicle
Bar Size(s)___________________________ License Number ____________________________
Grade(s) __________________________ Quantity, kg _______________________________
Mill Test Number ___________________
Consignee
(Name) ___________________________
(Project Name) _____________________
(Project No.) _______________________
(Location) _________________________
I certify that the reinforcing steel described above meets the specification requirements of the Ministry of Communications
based on test results supplied by the manufacturer.
Signed _________________________________________
Title___________________________________________
Date __________________________________________
Distribution: MOC (3)
With Shipment
Supplier's File
Fig. 1. Reinforcing Steel Certification
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 11/106
6-10
Mill Test Analysis for Reinforcing Steel
Manufacturer ________________________________________________________________________________________________(Name) (Location)
Shipped to: _______________________________________________________________ Manufacturer’s ID: ___________(Name)
_________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________
(Location) (Date)
(Date)
Chemical Analysis
Heat No. Grade C Mn P S Si Size Yield
Strength
Ultimate
Strength
Elon
Distribution: ______________________________________ I certify the above to be a true and
_________________________________________________ on the referenced material:
_________________________________________________ Signed _____________________
_________________________________________________ Title _______________________
_________________________________________________ Date _______________________
Fig. 2. Typical Mill Test Report For Reinforcing Steel
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 12/106
6-11
Certification of Structural Steel
A. Introduction
It is necessary that a chain of identification be developed for all structural steel in order that the individual segments of steel
as they exist in the structure can be identified from the time of manufacture at the steel mill. This identification is through
heat numbers as translated to the various piece numbers as fabricated. In order to accomplish this, each shipment of steel as
received on the project must have each piece of structural steel marked and be accompanied by a tally sheet or fabrication
worksheet which identifies the individual segments and also includes the heat number information for the steel from whichthe segments were fabricated. There must also be copies of the mill test analysis for each heat involved and should include
both the chemical laddle analysis and the physical test results including the Charpy impact test results when specified. A
typical mill test report is shown in Fig. 1.
B. On-Site Inspection
Upon receipt of a shipment of structural steel at the project site the Inspector shall review all documents related to the
shipment to insure that the Ministry has in hand all necessary mill test analyses, fabrication worksheets and shipping
documents as needed to identify the individual segments of the steel to the heat numbers as originally rolled and tested by
the manufacturer. If off-site fabrication and inspection is involved, be sure all material is tagged or identified to verify the
inspection and acceptance for the steel as received. Any items that have been painted should be checked for damage to the
paint film and any damage repaired before accepting the steel. On unpainted steel, look for excessive rusting that would
include pitting. If welds are visible on any of the work, check for uneven sloppy welds or badly discolored steel surroundingthe welded area which would indicate uneven overheating of the metal during welding or improper preheating or post
heating of the weld area. Be especially alert for any cracks in or around the welds and be sure proper corrective measures
are taken before the steel is installed. Inspectors and Engineers should be particularly alert whenever intersecting welds are
noted on fabricated members. This is a design detail which the Ministry of Communications is attempting to eliminate as it
has been found by experience to be undesirable. Any such members containing intersecting welds should be brought to the
immediate attention of the Engineer and the Ministry of Communications.
Structural steel items are not normally sampled when the procedures discussed above are followed. However, if
identification of any piece of steel cannot be determined, samples may be cut from the specimen if practical.
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 13/106
6-12
Mill Test Report
Company Name
Location
Date
Chemical Physical
Heat No. Size C Mn P S Si Yield
Strength
Ultimate
Strength
Elongation
Distribution: I certify that the above des
ments for the grade listed:
Signed
Title
Date
Fig. 1. Typical Mill Test Report for Structural Steel
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 14/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 15/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 16/106
6-15
Certification of Miscellaneous Metal Products
A. Introduction
There are a number of fabricated metal products that are routinely used in roadway construction other than those covered
previously. Among the more common are guardrail, corrugated metal pipe, steel piling, catch basins, and sign materials.
Each of these materials are required to meet certain specifications which usually include quality levels in both the basic
metals used and the fabrication of the completed product. Just as in reinforcing and structural steel, it is necessary that the
basic materials in any fabricated products be identified from the time of rolling or casting at the mill. This continuity of identification can be maintained through heat, casting, or lot numbers with certified test results for each. All shipping or
other control documents must include the heat, casting or lot number and be accompanied by certified test reports for the
materials involved. Typical test report forms are shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2.
B. On-Site Inspection
As shipments of manufactured metal products are received oil the project, the Engineer must confirm that all materials are
properly identified and that inspection or test reports are available. If offisite inspection has been done by representatives of
the Ministry, the material as received must be clearly marked or tagged in a recognized manner. Look for evidence of any
damage during shipping or handling and reject those items which cannot be satisfactorily repaired. Things to look for
include: scratches ill coatings of paint or galvanizing, cracked or chipped castings, bent or otherwise distorted rails or
shapes, and excess mill scale or rusting and pitting of steel. Check bituminous coated metal pipe for coating according to
the job specifications. Look for cracks in the bituminous coating and require repairs where found. Field samples for thesematerials are not routinely taken.
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 17/106
6-16
Metallurgical Test Report
Company Name
Location
Material DescriptionItem
No.Thickness Width or
Or Section Unit Mass Length
Quantity Weight Heat
No.
Test or
PieceIdentity
Yield,
(Units)
Heat No. Type C Mn P S Si Cu Ni Cr Mo Sn Al
Specification or Inspection Requirements:
Project No. Date WE HER
Purchase Order No. ANALYProject Name Shippers No. IN THIS
Mill No. CONTA
VENDOR SOLD TO: Invoice No. COMPA
Vehicle I.D. Signed
SHIP TO: Title
Date
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 18/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 19/106
6-18
Certification of Lime
A. Introduction
Lime used in mortar for masonry work may be either of two types known as hydrated lime or quicklime. Hydrated lime
when received on the project will be in bags of fine powder similar to portland cement whereas quicklime may be in the
form of chunks or pellets. Quicklime, when used, must be mixed with water at least 72 h before using and kept moist until
used. Hydrated lime is to be used immediately after mixing with water. Both types have definite chemical composition
requirements; however, the physical requirements for hydrated lime include fineness, setting time, soundness andcompressive strength while the only physical requirement for quicklime is a minimum plasticity value. A mill test report that
is applicable for either lime type is shown in Fig. 1.
B. On-Site Inspection
As shipments of lime are received on the Project, the Engineer must be sure the material is properly identified and that mill
test analyses representing the material are available. Lime must be stored in weather-tight facilities to protect the material
from damage. If it is quicklime, the material must be slaked according to the manufacturer's recommendation, allowing the
required setting time before use.
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 20/106
6-19
Mill Test Analysis
Company Name
Location
Date
The following is a certified analysis for (hydrated lime) (quicklime) manufactured
(date)and identified as (Lot No. etc.).
Chemical Analysis
Test Result Specification
CaO
MgO
SiO2
Al2O3 + Fe2O3
CO2
Physical Analysis
Plasticity
Residue
Fineness
Setting Time
Soundness
Compressive Strength
7 days
28 days
The analyses reported above are correct as contained in the records of the company.
Distribution: Signed
Title
Date
Fig. 1. Typical Manufacturer's Mill Test Analysis Certification
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 21/106
6-20
Standardization of Project Laboratories
A. Introduction
While it has been said that one test is worth a thousand opinions, there is a corollary that must be recognized. That
is, an erroneous test is worse than no test at all. Two principal sources of error in a test are faulty equipment and faulty
procedure.
Faulty equipment is given first priority for, while most testing errors will be the result of faulty procedure, there will
always be erroneous results when faulty equipment is used no matter how correct the procedure. Therefore the firstrequirement in standardization of project laboratories is a review and standardization of all equipment being used.
After equipment has been calibrated and otherwise verified, test procedures are to be observed and any noted errors
corrected.
B. Test Equipment Standardization and Calibration
Inspectors responsible for measuring and calibrating test equipment in all project laboratories as well as all MOC
laboratories shall be equipped with calipers, standard weights, proving rings and all other precise measuring devices as
needed. The following report sheets will be used to record the results of the equipment review. The report sheets are
arranged in the same order as the sections of the Materials Manual. Only those report sheets or parts of report sheets which
are applicable to the tests and equipment under review need be used. However, those parts not used should be marked N/A
(not applicable) or otherwise indicated when not filled out.
C. Test Procedure Review
The second requirement in the standardization of project laboratories is the review of test procedures or methods in
each laboratory. This is to be done in conjunction with the equipment standardization and calibration, and a set of
questionnaire sheets is provided to guide the inspector through the various test procedures. These questionnaires are not
intended to cover every operation in a test, but do concentrate on those steps which experience has shown to be the most
frequent sources of procedural error.
As with the report sheets for equipment calibration, the questionnaire sheets are arranged in the same sequence as
the sections of the Materials Manual. Also, it is expected that all sheets in a section will either be filled out or information
given that the questions do not apply.
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 22/106
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Communications
Materials and Research Department
Report on Laboratory Standardization Inspections
Date(s) to
Laboratory Identification
Laboratory Supervisor:
Name Title
Address
Facilities Inspected For:
Soils Testing; yes no
Aggregate Testing; yes no
Bituminous Testing; yes no
Concrete, Steel and Miscellaneous Testing; yes no
Inspectors:Name Title
Name Title
Name Title
Distribution:
MOC
Laboratory
Project EngineerOther
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 23/106
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Communications
Materials and Research Department
Inspection of Aggregate Laboratory
Inspection No.
Date(s)
1. Location of Laboratory
2 . Genera l Laboratory Data:
Lighting adequate? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .
Temperature controlled? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Specified Temperature Range: 20 - 30 C
Date
Time
Temperature
3 . Shipping Conta iners :
a. Tight bags, cans or boxes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Containers reasonably clean? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 . Sample Drying Equipment
a. Ovens
Temp. Condition
Make Type (105-115 C) OK
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Aggregate - 1
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 24/106
Inspection of Aggregate Laboratory (Continued)
5. Sample Size Reducers:
a. Splitters:
Make:
Chutes:Number? (must be even)
Equal size openings?
Minimum distance between dividers (mm)?
Size aggregate split?
Chute size 50% larger than aggregate?
Adjacent chutes discharge oppositely?
Dividers in good condition?
Miscellaneous:Split ter level?
Number of spli ts per run ( two)?
Feeder:
Feeder width equal to total chute
width (tolerance of -6 mm)?
Edge of feeder straight?
Discharge pans:
Length equals or exceeds total chute width?
Pans in good physical condit ion?
b. Quartering equipment:
Quarteringcloth? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Straightedge scoop or shovel? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Brush or broom? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Miniature stockpile sampling:
Sample thief? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Small scoop? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Spoon? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Aggregate-2
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 25/106
Inspection of Aggregate Laboratory (Continued)
6. Sieves:
Hole Size
Size
No
Insp.
No.
Cloth OK
No.
Frame OK
Open.
Less
Than
No.
OK
All
Holes
Uniform
No.
Sieves
All OK75 mm 78.7 mm
63 mm 66.2 mm
50 mm 52.6 mm
37.5 mm 39.5 mm
31.5 mm 33.2 mm
25.0 mm 26.4 mm
19.0 mm 20.1 mm
16.0 mm 17.0 mm
12.5 mm 13.3 mm
9.5 mm 10.2 mm
6.3 mm 6.8 mm
4.75 mm 5.1 mm
4.0 mm 4.4 mm
2.36 mm 2.6 mm
2.00 mm 2.2 mm
1.70 mm 1.9 mm
1.18 mm 1.3 mm
0.600 mm 0.7 mm
0.425 mm 0.5 mm
0.300 mm 0.4 mm
0.180 mm 0.2 mm
0.150 mm 0.2 mm
0.075 mm -------
All sieve covers and pans in good condition? yes no
No. sieves inspected?
No. sieves OK?
Remarks:
Date______________________________________Inspector_______________________________
MRDRS 6.10 Aggregate-3
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 26/106
Inspection of Aggregate Laboratory (Continued)
7. Mechanical Shaking Devices
Condition
Make Type ID. NO. OK
12
3
8 . B al an ce s:
Requirements.
Capacity
Class Readabili ty Sensit ivity Accuracy Approx.
C 0.01 g 0.01 g 0.02 g 1200 g
D 0.1 g 0.1 g 0.2 g 2000 g
E 1.0 g 0.5 g 1.0 g 5000 g
F 5.0 g 5.0 g 0.2% --------
Make?
Capacity?
Class?
Type?
Serial No.?
Sensit ivity OK?
Accuracy?
Dial or beam OK?
Total system OK?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Aggregate-4
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 27/106
Inspection of Aggregate Laboratory (Continued)
9. Scales: 1 2 3
Scale No.
Make?
Serial No.?Capacity?
Type?
Sensit ivity?
Readabili ty?
10. Balance Weights :
Set No.
Type
Material
2000 ± 0.40 g
1000 ± 0.25 g
500 ± 0.20 g
300 ± 0.15 g
200 ± 0.10 g
100 ± 0.07 g
50 ± 0.04 g
30 ± 0.03 g
20 ± 0.02 g
10 ± 0.02 g
5 ± 0.01 g
3 ± 0.01 g
2 ± 0.01 g
1 ± 0.01 g
No. of Weights Tested?
No. OK?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Aggregate-5
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 28/106
Inspection of Aggregate Laboratory (Continued)
11. Sand Equivalent Apparatus (MRDTM 313)
a. Timer or clock OK? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Tin measure, 85 ± 5 ml capacity and approximately 57 mm in diameter? . .
c. Straightedge or spatula in good condition? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d . Satisfactory s iphon assembly? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
e . Working surface: Free of vibration? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Shaded from sunlight? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f . Irr igator tubes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Ou ts id e d ia me te r 6 .4 mm?
Length approx. 508 mm?
End pinched?
End holes No. 60 dri ll?
g. Measuring cylinders:
Transparent plastic?
Graduated 2.5 mm?
Outs ide d iameter 38 .1 mm?
Insi de di ame te r 31 .2 mm?
Height 432 mm?
Condition OK?
Rubber stopper OK?
h. Weighted foot assembly:
Weight 1000 ± 5 g?
Attached guide used?
i. Stock solution formula OK? .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
j . Working solution - stored in glass or plastic
85 ± 5 ml stock solution per 3.79 liter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Liquid level 900 to 1170 mm above work surface? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Free of fungus growth? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Temp of solution 22 ± 3 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks.
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Aggregate-6
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 29/106
Inspection of Aggregate Laboratory (Continued)
12. Unit Mass Equipment (MRDTM 308)
a. Measures:
Capacity, li ter , nominal 3 10 15 30
Condition?
Diameter , mm? 152 ± 2 203 ± 2 254 ± 2 256 ± 2
Height, mm? 155 ± 2 292 ± 2 279 ± 2 284 ± 2
Thick, Bottom, mm,
minimum 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Wall , mm, minimum? 2.5 2.5 3.0 3.0
Watert ight?
Rim, Smooth?
Plane to 0.25 mm?C al ib ra ti on f ac to r r ep or te d?
b. Tamping rods:
15.9 mm diameter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
At least 400 mm long . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
15.9 hemispherical t ip . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
Relatively straight? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13. Organic Impurities Equipment (MRDTM 315)
#Checked # OK
a. Glass bott les, c lear , co lorless g lass? . . .. . . .. . . .
350-400 ml capacity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Graduated? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stoppers not soluble in reagents used? . . . . . . .
b . NaOH reagent , 3% solut ion by weight? . . .. . .
c . Reference color standards OK? . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .
Glass.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Solution . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Aggregate-7
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 30/106
Inspection of Aggregate Laboratory (Continued)
14. Sieve Analysis of Mineral Filler (MRDTM 307)
a. Nest of sieves: Top, 0.600 mm sieve? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
Middle, 0.300 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bottom, 0.075 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b . Satisfactory washing method: Nozzle spray? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
Rubber hose? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15. Equipment for Specific Gravity and Absorption of
Fine Aggregate (MRDTM 305)
a. Pycnometer: Volumetric f lask (500 ml)? Other?
b . C on ic al m ol d:Diameter at top 38 mm.? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
Diameter at bottom 89 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Height 74 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Metal thickness approximately 0.9 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c . T am pi ng ro d:
Weight, 340 ± 15 g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Flat, circular face? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diameter of tamping face 25 ± 3 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16. Equipment for Specific Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate. (MRDTM 304)
a. Sample container: No. 6 or No. 8 wire mesh . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
Minimum capacity 3500 cm3? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b . Weighing apparatus:
Of suitable design? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In good condition? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Suspension centered on balance? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adequate clearance for container? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Suspension wire smallest practical? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c . Immersion water at 23 ± 7C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Aggregate-8
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 31/106
Inspection of Aggregate Laboratory (Continued)
17.Los Angeles Abrasion Machine (MRDTM 309)
a. Manufacturer Serial No.
b. Hollow steel cylinder sealed at both ends? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c . Inside diameter 711 ± 5 mm? .. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .d. Length 508 ± 5 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e. Wall thickness 12.7 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f . Stub shafts fastened to ends? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
g. Cylinder mounted horizontal within 1 %? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
h. Opening approx. 508 X 150 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i . Dust-tight gasket on cover? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j . Cover fastens to drum securely? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
k. Shelf 89 X 25 mm plate or 152 X 102 X 12.7 mm angle? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Shelf firm and rigid? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
m. Shelf in good physical condition? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
n . Shelf mounted radially? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .
o. Shelf to opening 1270 mm or more in direction of rotation? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
p. Cylinder rotates at 30 to 33 rpm over 5 minute period? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Counter reading at start:
Reading at end:
Elapsed time: s
rpm =60Xrevs/time in s =
q. Uniform peripheral speed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
r . Drum driven by ?.. . OK?
s. Counter working accurately? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t . Number of revolutions per test is 500 ± 1? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
u. No. of balls tested?
No. weighing 390-445g? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . No. OK?
v. Weight of charge:
12 5000 ± 25g? 11 4584 ± 25g?
8 3330 ± 20g? 6 2500 ± l5g?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Aggregate-9
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 32/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 33/106
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Communications
Materials and Research Department
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory
Inspection No.Date(s)
1. Location of Laboratory:
2. General Laboratory Data:
Lighting adequate? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ventilation adequate? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hoods as needed in good condition? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Temperature automatically controlled? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Specified Range: 20 to 30 C
Date
Time
Temperature
3. Distilled water available?
4. Analytical Balances and Weights:
a. Balance accurate to 0.001 g avai lable? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . ..
Calibrated within past two years? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Accuracy of weigh ts c hecked w ith in pas t 2 year s? ........................................
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous- 1
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 34/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
5. Thermometers:
Thermometer Requirements
Ty pe Speci fi ca ti on
ASTNT Range
Immersion
Line
T=Total
mm N o .
I n s p e c t e d
?
R a n g e O K ?
I m m e r s i o n L i n e O K ?
S e r i a l N o .
O K
?
U n i f o r m
G r a d
u a t i o n s ?
C r a c k F r e e ?
C l e a n B o r e ?
G l o b u l e F r e e ?
B u b b l e F r e e ?
P i g m e n t a t i o n
O K ?
N o .
A l l O K ?
7C -2-300 T
8C -2-400 T
9C -7-110 57
11 C -6-400 25
13C 155-170 T
17C 19-27 T
18C 34-42 T
19C 49-57 T
20C 57-65 T
21C 79-87 T
22C 95-103 T
47C 58.6-61.4 T
49C 20-70 65
63C -8-32 T
64C 25-55 T
110C 133.6-136.4 T
113C -1-175 T
Total No. inspected? Total No. OK?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous-2
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 35/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 36/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
8. General Purpose Weights:
Set No.
Type
Material
2000 ± 0.40 g
1000 ± 0.25 g
500 ± 0.20 g
300 ± 0.15 g
200 ± 0. 10 g
100 ± 0.07 g
50 ± 0.04 g
30 ± 0.03 g
20 ± 0.02 g
10 ± 0.02 g
5 ± 0.01 g
3 ± 0.01 g
2 ± 0.01 g
1 ± 0.01 g
No. of Wts tested?
No. OK?
9. Mechanical Shaking Devices: Condition
Make Type ID No. OK
1
2
3
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous-4
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 37/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
10. Sample Splitters:
a. Make:
b. Chutes:
Number (must be even)?
Equal size openings?
Minimum distance between dividers (mm)?
Adjacent chutes discharge oppositely?
Dividers in good condition?
c. Miscellaneous:
Splitter level?No. of spli ts per run ( two)
d. Feeder:
Feeder width equal to total chute width?*
Edge of feeder straight
*Tolerance of -6 mm?
e. Discharge pans:
Length equals or exceeds total
chute width?
Pans in good physical condit ion?
f. Size compatability:
Maximum particle diameter, in sample being split? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mm
Maximum opening in splitters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . mm
(Note: Chute width should be at least 1½ times maximum particle diameter)
Remarks
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous-5
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 38/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 39/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
12. Apparatus for Marshall Test Procedure (MRDTM 410)
a. Specimen mold assemblies 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Mold inside diameter
101.5 to 101.7 mm? .. . . . . .
Col lar and base p la te f it? . .
b. Specimen extractor:
Diameter of disk at least 100 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provides smooth, continuous extrusion? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
No free-fall of specimen? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Compaction hammer:
Type: Manual? Mechanical?
If mechanical, calibrated against manual? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Tamping face; flat, unslanted, 98.4 mm diameter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sliding weight, 4536 ± 8 g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Drop of 457.2 = 1.5 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. Compaction pedestal:Steel cap, 300 X 300 X 25 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Caplevel? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cap firmly attached? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Post , 200 X 200 X 455 mm? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ..Plumb? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Attached to concrete slab? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Solid concrete slab? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Specimen holder centered? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e. Breaking head:
Radius of inner curvature, 50 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ends of test head beveled? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f . Loading device:
Capable of uniform movement of 50.8 mm/minute? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Load measuring device, 2300 kg capacity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sensitivity 4.5 kg (0-455 kg) 11.3 kg (455-2300 kg)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Flow measuring device graduated to 0.25 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous-7
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 40/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
g. Oven Hot Plate
Thermostatically, controlled to ± 3 C? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
Hot plate suitably equipped to minimize local overheating? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
h. Mixing apparatus-can maintain required mixing temperature? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i . Water bath:
At least 152 mm deep? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Perforated false bottom 50 mm above bath bottom? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thermostatically controlled at 60 ± 1 C? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
j . Thermometers:
Range, 10 to 204 C for agg., asphalts & mixes?.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Readable to at least 3 C?.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Range, 20-70 C for water bath? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .
Readable to 0.2 C? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
k. Miscellaneous:
Gloves? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . Asphalt heating container? . . . .
Trowel or spatula? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . Agg. heating container? . . . . . . ..Large spoon? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . Fil ter paper? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Flat-bottom scoop? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . Marking crayon? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
1. Sieves: (See Item 11)
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous-8
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 41/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
13. Bituminous Extraction Apparatus (MRTDM 418)
a. Extraction solvent used
b. Apparatus available for Moisture Determination by MRDTM 416? . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Apparatus for ash determination:
1. Graduated cylinder, 1 or 2 l i ter capacity? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
2 . Ignit ion dish, 125ml capacity? . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .
3 . Hot water bath? . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
4 . Muffle furnace or gas burner capable of 500-600 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
5 . Desiccator? . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .
6 . Ammonium carbonate, reagent grade? . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .
d. Miscellaneous:
1 . Pans , approximately 300 X 200 X 25 mm .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 . Spatula or trowel? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
e. Apparatus for Method A:
1 . Cent r ifuge ex t r ac tor :
Aluminum bowl with cover? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .
Rotational speed to 3600 rpm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Explosion proof? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hood or adequate ventilation? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fil ter r ing heavy, medium fast f i l ter paper? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
Outs ide diameter equal to outs ide diameter of bowl? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Inside diameter 50 mm less than inside diameter of bowl? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous-9
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 42/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
f . Appara tus for Method B:
Reflux extractor:
Heat resistant glass jar? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Two supported conical filter cones? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One cone above other? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Bottom of lower cone above solvent level? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Condenser Satisfactory? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Filter paper, medium grade, fast filtering? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hot plate, adjustable heating with pad? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
g . Appara tus for Method E:
1. Vacuum Extractor:Vacuum pump, type and conditon? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tank size, approx. 230 X 405 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vacuum gauge? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Drain? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Extract level gauge? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
End-point site tube? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Groove in top of tank for "O" ring? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Top designed to provide adequate vacuum? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Filter support plate fits to "O" ring? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adequate holes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funnel ring OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2. Filter paper, medium grade, fast 330 mm? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Sample container, 4 liter capacity? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Two flasks, 4000 ml capacity? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Flask, 1000 ml capacity? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Wash bottle? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Watchglass? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Spatula or mixing spoon? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Stiff-bristle brush? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Metal tongs? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Dial thermometer, 10 to 115 C? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous- 10
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 43/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
14. Apparatus for Effect of Water on Compacted Mixes (MRDTM 415)
a. 25 C Water bath-size sufficient for 3 specimens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Temperature: 25 ± 1 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. 60 C Water bath:Automatic temperature control to ± 1 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lined with s tainless s teel or other nonreactive material? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Size sufficient for total immersion of 3 specimens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bath emptied, cleaned & refi l led for each tes t ser ies? . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Distilled or demineralized water used? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Air bath-capable of 25 ± C for 4 hours? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. Transfer plates-3 or more flat glass or metal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e. Test machine meeting requirements of MRDTM 414? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15. Apparatus for Specific Gravity of Compacted Bit. Mix (MRDTM 411)
a. Specimen holder suspension design OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Water bath OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16. Apparatus for Compressive Strength of Bit. Mix (MRDTM 414)
a. Testing machine:
Make Capacity
Controlled loading at 2.5 to 10 mm/minute? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Upper bearing block spherically seated? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Center of sphere coincides with bearing face? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Block rotates freely and tilts in any direction? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diameter larger than diameter of any specimen tested? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bearing face plane to 0.025 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous- 11
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 44/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
b. Molds and plungers:
Steel molds 101.6 to 101.7 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Top plunger, 3 piece with fins 120 degrees apart? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Bottom plunger, 2 piece? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Mold supports, 25.4 mm square, steel or equal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. Oven, room temp. to 163 C settings? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e. Heater for mixing bowl? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f . Water bath? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Large enough for 3 sets of molds with plungers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Temp. control to just below boiling? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
g. Air bath-controllable to 25 ± 0.5 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
h . Spatulas - one l imber and one s t iff? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
i . Mixing machine (if used)-operation OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j . Ejection device-s mooth and uniform operation? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous- 12
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 45/106
Inspection of Bituminous Laboratory (Continued)
17. Apparatus for Determining Maximum Sp Gr of Bit. Mix (MRDTM 412)
a. Bowl determination method:
Bowl, glass or metal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capacity of at least 1000 ml? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Top smooth and plane? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cover, with gasket and hose connection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water bath, suitable to immerse bowl? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Suspension apparatus design OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thermometer, readable to 1 C at 25 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Flask determination method:
Volumetric flask of at least 1000 ml? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Top smooth and plane? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Has rubber stopper with hose connection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water bath of constant temperature? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thermometer, readable to 0.5 C at 25 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Miscellaneous apparatus for both methods:
Vacuum system capable of less than 30 mm Hg? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Flat pan? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Drying oven? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. Supplemental apparatus for porous aggregate:
Electric fan available? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Towel satisfactory for decanting? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Bituminous- 13
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 46/106
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Communications
Materials and Research Department
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory
Inspection No.
Date(s)
1 . Loca t ion of Labora tory
2 . Genera l Laboratory Data (MRDTM 524):
Lighting adequate?
Temperature and humidity
Date
Time
La b te mp. (20 to 25 C)
Storage: dry temp.?
wet temp.?
% rel. hum.?
Tanks, temp.?
Specimen storage facilities:
Stored specimens surface moist? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Storage has recording thermometer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Moist room-dimensions l = X w = X h =
Humidifacation by
Temperature controlled? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water tank:
Material
Size
Water clean? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water saturated with lime? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Temperature thermostatically controlled? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete- 1
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 47/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 48/106
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory (Continued)
4. Compression Testing: Machines
Manufacturer Serial No. Cap.
a.Indicating system:
1. Type?
Graduated beam-Graduation of beam? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Graduation of vernier? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
Hydraulic type- No. of dia ls? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
Diameter of dia ls? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
2. Range, smallest graduations & smallest readable load:
(1) (4)
(2) (5)
(3) (6)
Caution: The smallest test load should never be less than 100 ti mes the smallest change of
load which can be read.
Dials
(1) (2)
3. Does scale have graduation line equal to zero & so numbered? ...........
4. Dial point reaches to graduation marks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Width of pointer does not exceed distance between graduations? ........
6. Dial is equipped with zero adjustment outside of dial case?.................
7 . Dial is equipped w/maximum load indicator? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
b. Loading: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . by motor? by hand?
1. Hydraulic type:
Variable control? Pacing disk?
2. Lever type: Slowest rate?
c. Bearing blocks: Upper Lower
Diameter? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Scr ibing OK? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
P laneness (0.025)? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
Spherical block:
Upper? Lower? Block free?
Design of spherical block OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete-3
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 49/106
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory (Continued)
4 . Compress ion Tes ting Machine (cont 'd . )
d. Calibration information:
Date of last calibration or verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
By whom? Result within 1% . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .
e . Summary of verifications:
Range OK? Maximum load indicator OK?
Range OK? Maximum load indicator OK?
Range OK? Maximum load indicator OK?
Range OK? Maximum load indicator OK?
Range OK? Maximum load indicator OK?
f. Capsule clearance measurements:
Specified clearance: No. Load
Dial TestLoad Hole 1 Hole 2 Hole 3 Hole 4 Avg.
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete-4
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 50/106
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory (Continued)
5. Compression Machine Verification (MRDTM 528):
Make Serial No. Capacity Dial Ring No.
A. Dial Read, kN?
B. Temp., C?
C. Ring zero?
D. Ring reading?
E. Avg. ring zero?
D-E Ring deflect?
F. Temp. correct?
G. Deflect corr. to 23C?
H. Deflect from table?
H-G Error?
(Deflect)
H-G X 100 = %?
G
Label each column: D.P. (Dial pointer), M.L. (Maximum load), C.K. (Check point)
Platen raised mm
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete-5
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 51/106
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory (Continued)
6. Cylinder Molds:
a . Gener al i nf or ma tion:
Size of cylinders 152 x 305 mm? Other
Ratio of maximum aggregate size to cylinder diameter at least 1:3? . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average number of cylinders tested per year? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Dimensions of cylinder molds:
H__ ± 6 mm D__ ±1.6 mm H__ ± 6 mm D__ ± 1.6 mm H__ ± 6 mm D__ ± 1.6 mm
c . C ons tr uc tion o f m olds:
I Steel II Plastic
Single use?
Make
Mold vertical
Mold secured
Mold oil w/mineral Oil
Mold watertight
Base Plate
III Cardboard IV Tin
Make Make
3-ply sidewalls? Top edge curl OK?
Bottom: Metal? Mold coating OK?
Cardboard? Bottom/edge flush (=1.6 mm)?
Wax coating OK? Crimp: 4.75 mm radial maximum &
Bottom/edge flush (± 1.6 mm)? 3.2 mm vertical maximum?
Crimp: 4.75 mm rad ial maximum & Mold water tig ht?
3.2 mm vert. maximum?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete-6
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 52/106
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory (Continued)
7. Cylinder Capping Apparatus (MRDTM 527):
a. Capping equipment:
Plate thickness
Glass, 6.4 mm?
Steel , 12.5 mm?
Stone, 75 mm?
Dimensions (d+25 mm)?
Plate recess 12.5 mm maximum?
Planeness (0.05 mm)?
Surface condit ion.
Perpendicular guides?
Contact A?
Contact B?
Satisfactory?
b. Cap details:
Are caps free of chips and cracks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Approximate thickness of caps? (not over 8 mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Do tested caps show flowing or fracturing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Perpendicularity of cylinders to cap s urface (1.6 mm in 150 mm)
1 2 3 4 5
Cylinder
Check 1
Check 2
Check 3
Check 4
Satisfactory
Check on cap planeness (0.05 mm)
1 3 5 7 9
2 4 6 8 10
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete-7
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 53/106
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory (Continued)
8. Capping Material (MRDTM 527):
a . G yp su m p la st er :
Trade name?
Constant water-cement used ? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Strength of mix tested in 50 mm cubes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Age of cubes when tested? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Strength achieved in cubes? (kPa) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b . Sulfur and granular materia ls:
Trade name?
Cylinder ends dried prior to capping? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cylinder ends oiled prior to capping? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capping material reused? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Automatic temp. control on melting pot? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mechanical stirrer on melting pot? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Sulfur caps cure 2 h before test? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Sulfur mix compressive strength at 2 hours:
Temperature?
Time made?
T im e b ro ke n
Cube No. 1?
Cube No. 2?
Cube No. 3?
Total
Avg. kPa?
9. Scales-Make
Serial No.
Capacity
Minimum Graduation
Accuracy (±0.3% of test load)
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete-8
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 54/106
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory (Continued)
10. Slump Cone Apparatus (MRDTM 517):
Manufacturer
Metal thickness, 1.65 mm?
Metal not attacked by cement?Dimensions: Top, 102 ± 3 mm?
Bottom, 203 ± 3 mm?
Height, 305 ± 3 mm?
Base and top at right angles to axis?
Handles?
Foot pieces?
11. Tamping Rods (MRDTM 517, 518, and 523 ):
Diameter, 15.875 mm?
Length, approx 600 mm?
Tip, 15.875 hemispherical?
Diameter, 9.5 mm?
Length, approx 300 mm?
Tip, 9.5 hemispherical?
12. Vibrator (MRDTM 518):
Internal External
Make Make
Powered by? Powered by?
Frequency, 7000+? Frequency 3600+?
Diameter 19 to 38 mm? Clamping provisions?
Shaft (rigid or flex)? Type (table or plank)?
Shaft length?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete-9
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 55/106
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory (Continued)
13.Unit Mass of Concrete Apparatus (MRDTM 518):
a. Measure-Requirements
Thickness, Minimum mmApprox
Capacity
Maximum
Aggregate
Inside
Diameter
Inside
Height Bottom Wall Edge
10 li ter 25 mm 203 ± 3 292 ± 3 5 2.5
15 li ter 50 mm 254 ± 3 280 ± 3 5 3.0 5
30 li ter 75 mm 355 ± 3 285 ±3 5 3.0 5
Nominal capacity (liters)?
Calibration factor used?
Factor within 5% nominal
capacity?
Measure recalibrated
yearly?
Measure water tight?
Non-reactive metal?
Rigidity OK?
Diameter?
Height?
Thickness: Bottom?
Wall?
Edge?
Top plane to 0.25 mm?
T op a nd bo tt om pa ra ll el ?
Handles?
Maximum aggregate used?
Pressure meter bowl used?
b . M is ce ll an eo us :
Str ike-off plate satisfactory? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Mallet satisfactory? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete- 10
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 56/106
Inspection of Concrete Laboratory (Continued)
14. Equipment for Air Content of Concrete
(MRDTM 519):
a. Air meter:
Make? Type A or B?
Bowl-Type of metal?
Dimensions: Diameter? Height?
Diam equals 0.75 to 1.25 times height? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capacity at least 5.7 liter? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interior, rims and flanges in good condition? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cover assembly-Type of metal? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interior shape OK? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pressure-tight fit OK? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expansion factor less than 0.1 %? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Means for reading air content? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Type A: Graduated tube? . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .
Or metal standpipe w/glass gage? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Type B: Graduated dial? . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .
Dial range at least 8%? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Graduations readable to 0.1%? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fitted with: Air valves? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Air bleeder valves? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Petcocks for adding or bleeding off water? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Air pump attached? Accessory?
b. Calibration vessel:
Vessel placed in bowl for calibration? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Or part of cover assembly? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Volume of calibration vessel? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Miscellaneous:
Strike-off bar OK? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funnel with spout fitting spray tube? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water measure for fill ing indicator OK? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Concrete-11
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 57/106
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Communications
Materials and Research Department
Inspection of Soils Laboratory
Inspection No.
Date(s)
1 . Locat ion of Laboratory
2 . Genera l Laboratory Data:
Lighting adequate? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .
Temperature automatically controlled? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Specified Temperature Range: 20 - 30 C
Date
Time
Temperature
3 . Shipping Conta iners :
a. Canvas Bags? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b . Moisture-t ight containers? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .
c . Shipping containers appear to be dust t ight and otherwise satisfactory? . . . .
d. Are containers reasonably clean? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 . Sample Prepara t ion Apparatus
a. Dryer(s)
Kind Manufacturer Temperature
b . Pulveriz ing Equipment :
1. Rubber mallet or other for preliminary work? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Mortar & rubber covered pestle for final grinding? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Soils- 1
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 58/106
Inspection of Soils Laboratory (Continued)
5. Sample Splitters:
a. Make
b. Chutes:
Number? (must be even)
Equal size openings?Minimum distance between dividers (mm)?
Adjacent chutes discharge oppositely?
Dividers in good condit ion?
c . M is ce ll an eo us :
Spli t ter level?
Number of spli ts per run (two)?
d. Fe ede r:
Feeder width equal to total chute width (toler- ance of -6 mm)?
Edge of feeder straight?
e . D is ch ar ge P an s:
Length equals or exceeds total chute width?
Pans in good physical condition?
f. Size Compatibility:
Maximum particle diameter in sample being
spli t? mm
Maximum opening in spli t ters? mm
(Note: Chute width should be
at least 1½ times
maximum particle diameter)
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.0 Soils-2
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 59/106
Inspection of Soils Laboratory (Continued)
6. Sieves:
Hole Size
Size or
Number
No.
Insp.
No.
Cloth OK
No.
Frame
OK
Open.
less
than
No.
OK
No.
Holes
Uniform
No.
Sieves
All OK75 mm 78.7 mm
50 mm 52.6 mm
25.0 mm 26.4 mm
19.0 mm 20.1 mm
9.5 mm 10.2 mm
4.75 mm 5.1 mm
2.00 mm 2.2 mm
0.425 mm 0.5 mm
0.075 mm XXXXX
All sieve covers and pans in good condition? yes no
No. sieves inspected?
No. sieves OK?
7. Sieving Devices:
a. Hand sieving used? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Mechanical sieving devices:
Make ID Number1.
2.
3.
Are above in good condition? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Have they been checked for efficiency? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Soils-3
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 60/106
Inspection of Soils Laboratory (Continued)
8 . Test ing Ovens
Make
Serial No.
Temp control OK (110 ± 5 C)
Physical condition OK
Remarks:
9. Balances
Requirements
Capacity
Class Readabil i ty Sensit ivity Accuracy Approx.
C 0.01 g 0.01 g 0.02 g 1200 g
D 0.1 g 0.1 g 0.2 g 2000 g
E 1.0 g 0.5 g 1.0 g 5000 g
F 5.0 g 5.0 g 0.2 % ------
Make?
Capacity?
Class?
Type?
Serial No.?
Sensitivity OK?
Accuracy?
Dial or beam OK?
Total system OK?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Soils-4
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 61/106
Inspection of Soils Laboratory (Continued)
10. Scales
Scale No. 1 2 3
Make?
Serial No.?
Capacity?
Type?
Sensit ivity?
Readabil ity?
11. Balance Weights
Set No.
Type
Material2000 ± 0. 40 g
1000 ± 0. 25 g
500 ± 0.20 g
300 ± 0.15 g
200 ± 0.10 g
100 ± 0.07 g
50 ± 0.04 g
30 ± 0.03 g
20 ± 0.02 g
10 ± 0.02 g
5 ± 0.01 g
3 ± 0.01 g
2 ± 0.01 g
1 ± 0.0 1 g
No. of Weights Tested?
No. OK?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Soils-5
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 62/106
Inspection of Soils Laboratory (Continued)
12. Particle Size Analysis Apparatus (MRDTM 205)
a. D ispersion cup used (A or B of Fig. 2?)
b. Mechanical stirrer?
c. Runs at least 10,000 rpm?
d. Cup has 6 long and 6 short rods opposed?
e. Rods in good condition?.
f . C onstant temperature maintained?
How?
g . Disper s ing solu tion
*Sodium hexametaphosphate, 40 g/liter
Sodium polyphos, 21.6 g/liter
Sodium tripoly phosphate, 18.8 g/liter
Sodium tetraphosphate, 35.1 g/l i ter
*h. Solution less than 1 month old or buffered to pH8 or 9?
*1. Container has preparation date?
j . 1000 ml cylinders, line at 36 ± 2 cm
No. checked No. OK
k. Hydrometer 151 H or 152 H?
1. Reads zero in disti l led water?
m. Bulb diameter 3.05-3.20 cm?
n. Scale length 8.2-8.4 cm?
o. Disti l led or demineralized water?
p. Thermometer accurate to 0.5 C?
13. Minus 0.075 mm Equipment (MRDTM 206)
a. Container- size OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
condition OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Sieves -0.075 mm on hand and OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1 . 18 mm on hand? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .c . Wetting agent on hand? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Soils-6
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 63/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 64/106
Inspection of Soils Laboratory (Continued)
15. Plastic Limit Apparatus (MRDTM 208)
a. Rolling surface of ground glass plate or unglazed paper? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Porcelain evaporating dish about 115 mm in diameter? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Spatula about 75 by 20 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. Closed containers for moisture weighings? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
16. Specific Gravity Apparatus (MRDTM 207)
a. Volumetric f lask, volume at least 100 ml? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
b. Stoppered bottle, volume at least 50 ml? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Desiccator OK?... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d . Thermometer accurate to 1 C? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
e. Air removed from pycnometer by:
Boiling? Vacuum?
If vacuum, is pressure less than 100 mm of mercury?.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Soils-8
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 65/106
Inspection of Soils Laboratory (Continued)
17. Moisture Density Apparatus (MRDTM 212)
a. Hand rammers-Circular face:
Diam of face, 50.8 ± 0.127 mm ?
Weight of rammer, 4536 ± 8 g ?
Height of drop, 457.2 ± 1.5 mm?
Face of rammer flat?
Unrestricted fall?
Vent holes at each end?
b. Mounted rammers-Circular face:
Diam of face, 50.8 ± 0.127 mm ?
Face of rammer flat?
Height of drop, 457.2 ± 1.5 mm?Drop adjusts to soil elevation?
Operates OK?
c. Mounted rammers-Sector face:
Area of face 2027 mm2?
Face of rammer flat?
Height of drop, 457.2 ± 1.5 mm?
Drop adjusts to soil elevation?
Operates OK?
d. Performance of mounted rammers checked against hand rammer? . . . . . . . .. . . .
e . 152 .4 mm M olds:
Detachable collar?
Detachable base ?
Inside Dia met er, 152. 4 ± 1.0 mm?
Height, 116.43 ± 0.20 mm?
f. Straight edge, 250 mm with true beveled edge? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
g . Compaction base OK? . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .
h. Sample extruder OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i . Containers : moisture t ight? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Soils-9
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 66/106
Inspection of Soils Laboratory (Continued)
18. California Bearing Ratio Apparatus (MRDTM 213)
a. Rammers (checked in Item 17)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Molds:
Inside Diameter 152.4 ± 0 .66 mm?Height 177.8 ± 0.40 mm?
Detachable collar OK?
Base plate w/1.6 mm holes?
Spacer disks,
Diameter 150.8 ± 0.8 mm
Height 61.4 ± 0.13 mm
Surcharge weight, Annular ?
Diameter about 149.2 mm ?
Weight, 2.27 ± 0.04 kg
Surcharge we igh t, slo tt ed o r sp li t
Diameter about 149.2 mm ?
Weight, 2.27 ± 0.04 kg?
c. Penetration piston, diameter 49.63 ± 0.13 mm? ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
length, not less than 102 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. Expansion Pressure Apparatus
Swell plate, 149.2 mm diameter with
1.6 mm holes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustable s tem? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .
Tripod for dial indicator support? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dial indicators, 2 with 25 mm throw and
read to 0.02 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e. Loading device, compression type to 4500 kg? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rate of load of 1.27 mm/minute? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f . Soaking tanks OK? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
g. Coarse filter paper? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
h. Mixing pans? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDRS 6.10 Soils- 10
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 67/106
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Communications
Materials and Research Department
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures
Inspection No.
Date(s)
Location of Laboratory
Laboratory Workers Involved:
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Personnel Reviewing Inspection Results:
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate- 1
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 68/106
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures (Continued)
1. Reducing Field Samples of Aggregate to Testing Size (MRDTM 302)
A. Splitting:
1. Fine Aggregates: Drier than SSD? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .
If wetter, is quartering used? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 . Coarse Aggregates: Is spli t t ing used? . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .
Nominal maximum size, mm chute opening, mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Procedure: Material evenly spread on feeder? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
Sample allowed to flow freely through chutes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Material respli t unti l desired mass obtained? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
B. Quartering:
1. Is sample: Dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .Wet? SSD? Apparently dry?
2. Sample mixed by turning 3 t imes on clean, hard surface or by roll ing in canvas
from each corner three times? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Conical pile formed and flat tened to uniform thickness?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
4 . Diameter (4 to 8 t imes thickness) divided into 4 equal portions? . . . . . . . .. . . .
5 . Clear space between quarters brushed clean of al l f ines? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
6 . Two diagonally opposite quarters removed? . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
7 . Process cont inued unti l des i red sample mass obta ined? . . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . ..
2 . Sand Equivalent Tes t (MRDTM 313)
A. Sample Preparation:
1. All 4.75 mm minus material separated by grinding and sieving? . . . . . . . .. . . .
2. Amount for 4 tests measured with 85 ml tin with tapping? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Material from step 2 spli t twice for tes t samples? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ..
4. Test samples dried to constant mass at 110 ± 5 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate-2
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 69/106
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures (Continued)
B. Test Procedures:
1. 101.6 ± 2.5 mm of working solution syphoned into cylinders? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Sample added without loss? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Wetted sample stands for 10 ± 1 minute undisturbed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Cylinder stoppered and material loosened by hand shaking? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Cylinder placed in shaker and agitated for 45 ± 1 s? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Cylinder removed and placed upright on table without stopper? . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7 . Material r insed from sides as irr igator tube is lowered? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
8. Tube worked to bottom and solution level raised to 381 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Tube withdrawn, maintaining 381 mm solution height? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Cylinder stands undisturbed 20 minutes ± 15 s? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Clay reading recorded at 20 minutes ± 15 s? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Sand reading taken with weighted-foot assembly? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13. Reading between graduation lines recorded to higher graduation? . . . . . . . . .
14. S.E. calculated to 0.1 and rounded up to whole number? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15. Averaged SE's are rounded up to next whole number? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate- 3
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 70/106
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures (Continued)
3. Unit Mass of Aggregate (MRDTM 308) A. Preparation:
1. Sample obtained by MRDTM 302? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Correct measure used for aggregate test? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Rodding Procedure (up to 37.5 mm particles):
1. Measure filled 1/3, full and leveled with fingers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. 25 evenly distributed tamping strokes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Measure filled with two more similar layers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Tamping strokes limited to layer being tamped? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Level surface obtained by hand or tamping rod? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Net mass determined to 0.1 %? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Net mass of aggregate multiplied by calibration factor? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. Jigging Procedure (37.5 mm to 100 mm particles):
1. Measure f i l led 1/3, full and leveled with f ingers? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
2. Layer compacted by raising alternate sides 50 mm and dropping 25
times each side? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Measure filled with two more similar layers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Level surface obtained by hand or tamping rod? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Net mass determined to 0.1 %? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Net mass of aggregate multiplied by calibration factor? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate-4
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 71/106
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures (Continued)
D. Shoveling Procedure (up to 100 mm particles):
1. Mass filled to overflowing with scoop or shovel? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Aggregate discharged within 50 mm of top of measure? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Level surface obtained by hand or tamping rod? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. Net mass determined to 0.1 %? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 . Net mass of aggregate multiplied by calibration factor? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
Remarks:
4 . Organic Impur i t ies in Sands for Concre te (MRDTM 315)
A. Sample Preparation:
1. Sample obtained by MRDTM 302? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Sample mass about 300 g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Sample is: SSD? SD? Air Dry?
As received? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Procedure:
1. Sand added to the 135 ml level in the bottle? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. NaOH solution added to approximately 210 ml? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Bottle stoppered? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Bottle shaken vigorously? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Allowed to stand for 24 h? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Color comparison made against solutions or glass plate? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7 . Color reported as ei ther l ighter , same, or darker , or by plate No. 2? . . . . . . . ..
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate-5
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 72/106
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures (Continued)
5. Sieve Analysis of Mineral Filler (MRDTM 307)
1. Sample mixed and tes t portion obtained by spoon or small scoop?. . . . . . . .
2 . Sample mass about 100 g? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .
3 . Sample dried to constant mass and weighed to 0. 1 g? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
4 . Sample s ieved on specified s ieves? (0.600, 0.300, 0.075 mm) . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
5 . Material washed unti l water through s ieves is clear?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
6 . Velocity of water does not splash material over s ide? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
7 . Residue on each s ieve dried to constant mass and weighed?. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
8 . Results reported as percent passing each s ieve to 0.5%?. . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Remarks:
6. Specif ic Gravity and Absorption of Fine Aggregate (MRDTM 305)
A. Sample Preparation:
1. Sample obtained by MRDTM 302? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Sample approximately 1000 g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Oven dried to constant mass and covered with water 15 to 19 h? . . . . . . .. . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate-6
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 73/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 74/106
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures (Continued)
7. Specif ic Gravity and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate (MRDTM 304)
A. Sample Preparation:
1. Sample obtained by MRDTM 302? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
2 . Sample of about 5 kg selected? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
3 . Sample screened on 4.75 mm sieve? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
4 . Washed to clean part icle surfaces? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
5 . Oven dried to constant mass and covered 15 h with water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
B. Procedure:
1. Sample rolled in cloth to remove surface water? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .
2 . Evaporation avoided? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .
3 . Weighed to 1 g? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .4 . Placed in basket container? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
5 . Weighed in water at 23 ± 1.7 C to nearest 1 g? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
6 . Sample dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
7 . Cooled to room temperature? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
8 . Weighed to 1 g? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .
9 . Correct calculations made to determine bulk Sp. Gr. (SSD), apparent Sp. Gr., and absorption?
Remarks:
8. Los Angeles Abrasion Test (MRDTM 309) A. Sample Preparation:
1. Sample crushed clean or washed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Aggregate clean or washed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Clean aggregate dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate-8
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 75/106
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures (Continued)
B. Procedure:
1. Test sample weighed to nearest 5 g? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
2 . Sample masses a s fo l lows :
A B C D37.5 to 25 mm 1250 ±25 g
25 to 19.0 mm 1250 ±25 g
19.0 to 12.5 mm 1250 ± 10 g 2500 ± 10 g
12. 5 to 9.5 mm 1250 ± 10 g 2500 ±10 g
9.5 to 6.3 mm 2500 ± 10 g
6.3 to 4.75 mm 2500 ± 10 g
4.75 to 2.36 mm 5000 ± 10 g
5000 ± 10 g 5000 ± 10 g 5000 ± 10 g 5000 ± 10 g
3. Sample and spheres put in machine and tumbled 500 t imes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Correct number of spheres used according to grading? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Contents of drum separated on a 4.75 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Finer material separated on a 1.70 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Material on 1.70 mm sieve weighed to nearest 5 g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8 . Percentage of wear calculated by dividing original mass into difference
between original and final masses? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate-9
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 76/106
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures (Continued)
9. Sulfate Soundness Test (MRDTM 311)
A. Sample Preparation-Fine Aggregate:
1. Washed on 0.300 mm sieve and dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Rough graded to obtain 110 + g of test sizes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Each size sieved mechanically for 10 minutes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Aggregates sticking in sieve openings discarded? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Samples of 100 ± 0.1 g of each size put in containers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Sample Preparation -Coarse Aggregate:
1. Aggregate washed and dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Sample separated into required sizes by hand sieving to refusal? . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Each tes t fraction weighed as specif ied (for s izes present)? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
C. Test Procedure:
1. Sizes representing less than 5% of total sample discarded? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Solution stirred, breaking up salt cake on bottom? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Specific gravity of solution checked? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 . Each sample immersed 16 to 18 h at least 12.5 mm under surface? . . . . . . . . ..
5. Sample removed from solution and drained 10 to 20 minutes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Dried to constant mass and cooled to room temperature? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Reimmersed, etc., for prescribed number of cycles? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. After final cooling, sample washed free of sulfate? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Sulfate removal checked with barium chloride? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Each fraction dried to constant mass in oven? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Fine aggregate: mechanically s ieved 10 minutes over specif ied s ieves? . . .
12. Coarse aggregate: hand sieved over following sieves:
31.5 mm for 63 to 37.5 mm? 8.0 mm for 19.0 to 9.5 mm?
16.0 mm for 37.5 to 19.00 mm? 4.00 mm for 9.5 to 4.75 mm?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate- 10
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 77/106
Inspection of Aggregate Test Procedures (Continued)
10. Clay Lumps and Friable Part icles (MRDTM 312)
A. Sample Preparation:
1. Samples taken from material left over from MRDTM 206? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 . Material dr ied to substantial ly constant mass?. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
3. Fine Aggregate:
(a) Consists of particles coarser than 1.18 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) Sample weighs 100 + g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Coarse Aggregate:
(a) Consists of particles coarser than 4.75 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) Sample masses as follows: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(1) 4.75 to 9.5 mm - 1000 + g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) 9.5 to 19.0 mm - 2000 + g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3) 19.0 to 37.5 mm - 3000 + g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(4) over 37.5 turn - 5000 + g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Procedure:
1. Sample spread in thin layer? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Covered with distilled water and soaked 24 ± 4 h? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Friable particles broken up with fingers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Residue of friable particles removed by wet screening of: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(a) fine aggregate on 0.850 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) 4.75 to 9.5 mm on 2.34 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) remaining sizes on 4.75 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Residue from each sieving saved and weighed to 0.02% of original
mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Percentage
(a) Fine Aggregate: P = W-R x 100 . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
W
(b) Coarse Aggregate: Averaged?.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Aggregate- 11
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 78/106
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Communications
Materials and Research Department
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures
Inspection No.
Date(s)
Location of Laboratory
Laboratory Workers Involved:
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Personnel Reviewing Inspection Results:
Name Position
Name Position
Name PositionName Position
Name Position
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous-1
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 79/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
1. Design of Asphalt Concrete Mixtures using Marshall Procedures (MRDTM 410)
A. Preparation:
1. Were the mixing and compaction temperatures based on thetemperature- viscosity curves for the asphalts? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. At least 3 specimens for each aggregate-bituminous content combination? ..................
3 . Aggregate weighed by sieve size into separate pan for each specimen?
4. Aggregate heated in oven or on hot plate to not more than 28 C over
specified mixing temperature? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 . Hot aggregate placed in mixer and thoroughly dry-mixed? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
6 . Crater formed in aggregate? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .
7 . Required amount of heated asphalt weighed in to mixed aggregate? . . . ..
8 . Aggregate and asphalt rapidly mixed unti l thoroughly mixed? . . . . . . . .. . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous-2
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 80/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 81/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
C. Testing of Specimens:
1. Specimens brought to test temperature? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Bath or oven maintained at 60 ± 1 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Breaking head and guide rods clean and lubricated? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. Breaking head at 21 to 38 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Specimen placed in lower segment of breaking head? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Upper segment placed on specimen? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Breaking head and specimen positioned on testing machine? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Flow meter placed and adjusted to zero? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Load applied to specimen until maximum load reached? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Loading head moves at constant rate of 51 mm/minute? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Maximum load applied within 30 s after specimen removed from oven or bath? ...............
12. Maximum load and flow value recorded? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
2. Extraction of Asphalt f rom Bituminous Mixes (MRDTM 418)
A. Sample Preparation:
1. Mix heated as needed to permit breaking apart? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
2. Sample obtained by splitting or quartering? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Sample size according to maximum aggregate size? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Sample divided equally if multiple extraction necessary? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous-4
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 82/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
B. Extraction Procedure by Method A:
1. 1000 to 2500 g sample weighed into bowl and covered with solvent? . . . . . . .
2. Sample allowed to soak for not more than 1 h? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Filter ring dried, weighed and fitted on the bowl? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Cover clamped tightly on bowl? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 . Container placed under drain to collect extract? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
6. Centrifuge speed increased slowly to not more than 3600 rpm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Centrifuge stopped when solvent ceases to flow? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. 200 ml solution added and steps 6 and 7 repeated? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9 . Step 8 repeated at least twice more or unti l extract clear? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
10. Filter ring removed, dried and mineral matter brushed into bowl? . . . . . . . . .11. Filter ring oven-dried and weighed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Bowl contents dried (oven or hot plate) and weighed to 0. 1%? . . . . . . . .. . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous-5
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 83/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 84/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
D. Extraction Procedure by Method E:
1. Sample weighed and cooled below 93 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. If used, 200 ml alcohol added with care? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. 700 ml of solvent added and mixture stirred? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. Extractor assembled with filter paper? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Finger tight) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Solution decanted into extractor? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Vacuum stopped when solution removed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. 700 ml of solvent added, mix stirred and decanted? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Additional washings until solution light straw colored? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. All aggregate transferred to extractor and spread evenly? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Aggregate dried using vacuum? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Aggregate transferred to tared drying pan? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Filter ring and paper brushed clean? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13. Aggregate and filter paper dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous-7
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 85/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
3. Specif ic Gravity of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures (MRDTM 411)
A. Method A:
1. Specimen dried and weighed? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
a. Overnight at 60 ± 5 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Mass change less than 0.1 % on subsequent 2 h drying? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 . Entire specimen coated with paraff in? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
a. Pinholes sealed by painting with paraffin? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Specimen cooled 30 minutes to room temperature? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
4 . Coated mass determined?. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
5 . Coated specimen weighed in water at 25 C? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
6 . Sp. Gr. of paraff in determined or known? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
7 . Bulk Sp. Gr. of specimen calculated? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .
Remarks:
B. Method B:
1. Specimen dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Specimen brought to room temperature (25 ± 1 C)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Specimen weighed in air? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Specimen immersed in 25 ± 1C water for 1 minute? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Mass of specimen in water determined? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Specimen removed from water and blotted surface dry? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Mass of surface dry specimen determined? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Bulk Sp. Gr. of specimen calculated? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous-8
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 86/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
4. Compressive Strength of Bituminous Mixtures (MRDTM 414)
A. Preparation of Test Mixtures:
1. Bowl and s t irrers "buttered" with init ial batch? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .2 . Init ial batch used for tr ial specimen or discarded? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
3. Bowl and stirrers cleaned with limber spatula? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Wiping with cloth or use of solvent avoided? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 . Trial specimen used to determine proper mass of batch? . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
6. Aggregate sieved and combined to meet desired formula? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Weighed aggregate batch thoroughly dry mixed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Aggregate and asphalt material heated to 163 ± 3C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Mixing bowl preheated to about 163 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Aggregate placed in bowl and asphalt weighed in? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Materials wet mixed 90 see to 2 minutes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous-9
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 87/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
B. Molding Test Specimens:
1. Mixtures brought to 124 ± 3 C? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 . Top and bottom plungers and mold heated in near boil ing water? . . . . . . . .. .
3. Mold and plungers removed, wiped dry and lightly oiled? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. Spatula heated? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 . With bottom plunger in place and cylinder on s teel bars? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
a. Approximately half of mixture placed in mold? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. 15 blows of spatula around inside of mold? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. 10 blows of spatula at random over surface of mix? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. Penetration of spatula as deep as possible? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Remaining mix quickly placed in mold? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Steps 5 b, c and d repeated? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8 . Top of mix l if t s l ightly rounded or cone shaped? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
9. Filled mold compressed about 10.5 kg/cm2? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
10. Support bars removed and load increased to 211 kg/cm2? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
11. Specimen removed with ejection device? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Specimen 101.6 mm in diameter and 102 ± 7.5 mm in height? . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous- 10
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 88/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
C. Curing Test Specimens:
1. Specimens placed in oven at 60 C for 24 hrs? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .
2 . Specimens brought to tes t temperature in 25 C air bath at least 4 h? . . . . . . . ..
3. If not tested within 24 h of oven curing, specimens placed in air tight containers? ..............
D. Procedure:
1. Bulk Sp. Gr. determined by MRDTM 411? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
2 . Specimens tes ted in axial compression without lateral support? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
3. Rate of vertical deformation uniform at 1.3 mm/minute/25 mm of specimen height? .........
5. Maximum Specific Gravity of Bituminous Mixtures (MRDTM (412)
A. Sample Preparation:
1 . Sample mass as fo l lows:
Nominal Maximum Size Minimum Sample Sizes, kg
25.0 mm 2.5
19.0 mm 2
12.5 mm 1.5
9.5 mm 1
4.75 mm 0.5
2. Sample part icles separated with care? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
3 . Sample cooled to room temperature and weighed in f lask? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ..
4 . Water at 25 C added to cover sample? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
5 . Entrapped air removed by vacuum for 15 ± 2 minutes? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
6 . Container aggitated about every 2 minutes? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous- 11
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 89/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
B. Bowl Determination:
1. Bowl and contents suspended in water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Net mass determined after 10 ± 1 minute immersion? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. Flask Determination:
1. Flask f i l led with water and placed in 25 ± 5 C water bath? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .
2 . After contents reach 25 ± 5 C, f lask f i l led to top and weighed? . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .
3. Mass determination made 10 ± 1 minute after vacuuming? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Correct formulas used to calculate Sp. Gr.? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Effect of Water on Cohesion of Compacted Bituminous Mixtures (MRDTM 415)
A. Preparations:
1. At least 6 specimens prepared according to MRDTM 414? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Bulk Sp. Gr. determined according to Method B, MRDTM 411? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Procedures:
1. Each set of six specimens separated into groups of three? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Each group tested as follows:
a. Group 1
(1) Specimens s tored in 25 C air bath at least 4 h? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
(2) Compressive Strength of specimen determined by MRDTM 414? . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous- 12
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 90/106
Inspection of Bituminous Test Procedures (Continued)
b. Group 2
(1) Specimens on transfer plates immersed in water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) Specimens transferred to 25 ± 1 C water bath for 2 h? . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
(3) Compressive strength determined by MRDTM 414? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. Calculations:
1. Numerical index of resistance to water, calculate as follows:
Index of retained strength = Compressive Strength of Group 2 specimens
Compressive Strength of Group 1 specimens
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Bituminous- 13
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 91/106
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Communications
Materials and Research Department
Inspection of Concrete Test Procedures
Inspection No.
Date(s)
Location of Laboratory
Laboratory Workers Involved:
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Personnel Reviewing Inspection Results:
Name Position
Name Position
Name PositionName Position
Name Position
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Concrete- 1
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 92/106
Inspection of Concrete Test Procedures (Continued)
1. Slump Test for Concrete (MRDTM 517) A. Procedure:
1. Cone clean and damp, and on damp, non-absorbing surface? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Cone filled in 3 layers of equal volume? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Each layer rodded 25 t imes? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
4. Layers rodded properly:
bottom? middle? top?
5. Last layer kept heaped above cone during rodding? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Cone struck off level with the top? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Cone held firmly in place during filling? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Cone removed in single, smooth, vertical motion? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Cone filled and removed within 2 ½ minutes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Time to lift cone 5 ± 2 s? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Slump measured to nearest 5 mm? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Measuring procedure satisfactory? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
2. Fabrication of Concrete Cylinders (MRTDM 523)
A. Procedure:
1. Total mixing time in mixer? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Mold filled in 3 approximately equal layers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Each layer placed and properly consolidated? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Mold tapped to close voids left by rodding? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Cylinder mold struck off level with top? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6 . Mold covered with a glass or metal plate, or polyethelene f i lm? . . . . . . . .. .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Concrete-2
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 93/106
Inspection of Concrete Test Procedures (Continued)
3. Testing of Concrete Cylinders (MRDTM 528)
A. Preparation:
1. Are cylinders kept moist between capping and testing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 . Straightedge and feeler gauge available for checking cap planeness?. . . . .
3. Laboratory checks at least 3 cylinders daily for planeness? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 . Cylinder diameter measured to 0.25 mm? .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
5. How are cylinders measured? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Procedure:
1. Lower and upper bearing surfaces cleaned? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Axis of cylinder aligned with center of spherical block? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Spherical block rotated as it contacts the cylinder? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
4 . Load applied continuously and without shock at the specif ied rate? . . . . . .
Remarks:
4. Mass Per Cubic Meter of Concrete (MRDTM 518)
A. Procedure:
1. Measure filled in 3 equal layers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Top layer filled to avoid overfilling? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Each layer rodded:
25 t imes for 14 l i ters or less?. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
50 t imes for 28 l i ters or less?. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
4 . Measure tapped 10 to 15 t imes af ter rodding each layer? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
5 . Top surface s truck off and f inished smooth with f lat cover plate? . . . . . . .
6 . Exterior of measure cleaned and unit mass determined? . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Concrete-3
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 94/106
Inspection of Concrete Test Procedures (Continued)
5. Air Content of Concrete- Pressure Method (MRDTM 519)
A. General:
1. Bowl filled in three equal layers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Each layer rodded 25 times? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Bowl tapped 10 to 15 times after rodding each layer? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Top layer added in a manner to avoid overfilling? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Excess concrete removed with sawing motion during strike off? . . . .. . ..
B. Procedure-Type "A" Meter:
1. Flanges of bowl and cover assembly clean? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Inner surface of cover assembly moistened? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Water added to half-way in standpipe? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. Apparatus tilted and rotated several revolutions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Cover tapped during rotation? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. Water added to slightly above zero while tapping? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Foam removed with syringe or alcohol spray? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Water adjusted to zero and vent closed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Slightly excess test pressure applied with pump? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. What standard (calibrated) pressure is used? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Sides of measure tapped sharply? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Water level, H1 , read accurately at tes t pressure? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ..
13. Air pressure gradually released through vent and sides of bowl tapped
lightly for about 1 minute? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14. Water level, H2 recorded to nearest divis ion or ½ divis ion? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15. Steps 9 through 14 repeated and results averaged? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16. Values repeated within 0.2%? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .
17. Aggregate correction factor determined for different aggregates? . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Concrete-4
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 95/106
Inspection of Concrete Test Procedures (Continued)
C. Procedure-Type "B" Meter:
1. Flanges of bowl cleaned and unit assembled? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Air valve between air chambers and bowl closed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Both petcocks on cover opened? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. Water injected with syringe through one petcock until it flows from opposite petcock?
5. Meter jarred gently unti l al l air is expelled? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . .
6. Air bleeder valve closed and air pumped into chamber until gauge is on
initial pressure line? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. What standard (calibrated) pressure is used? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. A few seconds allowed for compressed air to cool? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9. Initial pressure stabilized while tapping gauge? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Both petcocks now closed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Air valve between air chamber and bowl opened? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Sides of bowl tapped sharply? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13. Percentage of air read while tapping gauge lightly? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
14. Air valve closed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15. Both petcocks opened slowly? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16. Air content corrected for aggregate correction factor? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Concrete-5
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 96/106
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Communications
Materials and Research Department
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures
Inspection No.
Date(s) Location of Laboratory
Laboratory Workers Involved:
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Personnel Reviewing Inspection Results:
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Name Position
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Soils- 1
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 97/106
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures (Continued)
1. Dry Preparation of Disturbed Soil and Soil-Aggregate Samples (MRDTM 201)
A. Initial Preparation:
1. Sample thoroughly dried at temperature less than 60 C? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
2. Soil pulverized? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3. Sample selected by splitter or quartering? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Sample size adequate for intended test? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. For Particle Size Analysis Sample (MRDTM 205):
* (a) Using 4.75 mm (No. 4) and 2.00 mm (No. 10) sieves
*1. Sample weighed to 0. 1 % of total sample mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*2. Sample separated on 4.75 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*3. Plus 4.75 mm material reground and resieved? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*4. Both portions minus 4.75 material mixed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*5. Test portions of minus 4.75 material by spli t or quarter? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
(b) Using 2.00 mm (No. 10) sieve only
6. Sample weighed to 0. 1% of total sample? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Sample separated on 2.00 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8. Plus 2.00 mm material reground and resieved? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
*9. All plus 2.00 mm material combined for coarse s ieve analysis . . . . . . . . . .
(if using 4.75 mm and 2.00 mm sieves)?
*10. (a) All plus 4.75 mm material retained after Step 3? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
(b) All minus 4.75 mm material and plus 2.00 mm material retained? .. .. .. . .. .. . .
11. All minus 2.00 material combined and mixed thoroughly? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Test portion (60-110 g) for particle size analysis by split or quarter? ........................
*13. Test portion (10-25 g) for specific gravity (MRDTM 207)? . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Soils-2
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 98/106
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures (Continued)
C. For Liquid Limit (MRDTM 209) Plastic Limit (MRDTM 208):
1. Remaining minus 2.00 mm material separated on 0.425 mm sieve?.. . . . . . . . . . .
2. Plus 0.425 mm material ground carefully? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Ground soil separated on 0.425 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4. Steps 2 and 3 repeated until minimal amount passes sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5. Material larger than 0.425 mm discarded? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6. All minus 0.425 mm combined and mixed for test? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
D. Moisture- Density Relations (MRDTM 212):
1. Sample from A-3 above separated on 19 mm sieve? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Sample re-pulverized if necessary? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Material passing 19 mm sieve thoroughly mixed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4. Material retained on 19 mm sieve kept for possible use? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
2. Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregate (MRDTM 204)
A. Procedure: Fine Coarse
1. Sample obtained by MRDTM 302? .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
2 . Sample mass varies from test to tes t? . . . . . . . .. . . . .
3 . Sample dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
4 . Finger manipulation not used? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
5. Sieving continued to less than 0.5% per minute in check?.
6. Results weighed to 0.2% of total mass? . . . . . . . .. .
7. Percentages reported to nearest whole number? ................
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Soils-3
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 99/106
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures (Continued)
B . S am pl e Ma ss :
1. Fine Aggregrate: 2.36 mm-100 g, 4.75 mm-500 g approximately?
Residue per sieve less than 0.6 g/cm2? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2. Coarse Aggregrate: 9.5 mm-1 kg, 12.5 mm-2 kg, 19 mm-5 kg, 25.0mm-10 kg, 37.5 mm-15 kg, 50 mm-20 kg, 63 mm-25 kg, 75 mm-30
kg, 90 mm-35 kg? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3. Particle Size Analysis (MRDTM 205)
a. Samples for analysis after preparation by MRDTM 201 consists of all plus 4.75 mm material? and
all plus 2.00 mm material? and 60 to 100 g of minus 2.00 mm material
All OK?
b. Weighing of hygroscopic and hydrometer samples to 0.01 g?
Coarse material weighed to 0. 1%?
c. Hygroscopic moisture sample taken? and weighs at least 10 g? %
moisture determined by oven drying? All OK?
d. Coarse sieving on 75, 50, 25, 9.5, & 4.75 mm sieves?
sieving continued to I% residue endpoint?
Calculation based on total sample mass, corrected for hygroscopic moisture?
All OK?
e. Hydrometer analys is sample between 50 & 100 g :
1. Sample soaked overnight? , in 125 ml of s tock solution? and
washed into dispersing cup?
2. For mechanical mixers , dist i l led or demineralized water added until cup is half
full? and mixed for 1 minute?
3. Suspension made up to 1 liter? using distilled or demineralized water? then
allowed to thermally stabilize? and shaken 1 minute? All OK?
4. Hydrometer read at 2, 5, 15, 30, 60, 250 and 1440 minutes? to
1/2 division? and cleaned between readings? Temperature
recorded? All OK?
5. Book formulas used in calculations?
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Soils-4
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 100/106
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures (Continued)
f. Fine sieve and sample from hydrometer test? _________, or from fresh material? washed over 0.075
mm sieve? plus 0.075 mm material sieved with 0.425 mm & 0.075 rum sieves? , and
percentages related to the whole sample? All OK?
4. Liquid Limit of Soils (MRDTM 209)
a. Liquid l imit device inspected and height of cup drop checked? . . . . . . . .. . . . . .
b . Sample of 50 to 100 g of minus 0.425 mm soil? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
c . Soil mixed with 15 to 20 ml of water? . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .
d. Distilled or demineralized water used? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e. Mixing done by stirring, kneading & chopping with spatula? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f . Addit ional water (1 to 3 ml) added to uniform mass of s t iff consis tency?.
g. Cup f i l led to 1 cm deep at center? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
h. Care taken to avoid entrapment of air? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i . Pat groove made with no more than 6 strokes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J . Groove in l ine with centerl ine of follower? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
k . Tearing along groove and s l ippage of pat avoided? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
1 . Two drops/second with 12.7 mm closing in 25 to 35 shocks? . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
m. Base not held with hand? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .
n. Soil sliced at right angles to groove for moisture sample in tared
containers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
o . Container and soil immediately weighed? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .
p. Remaining soil returned to mixing dish? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
q. Cup and grooving tool washed and dried? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
r. Water added to material & steps e thru p repeated for closure in 20 to 30 shocks? ............
s . Cup and grooving tool washed and dried? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
t . S tep r repeated to produce closure in 15 to 20 shocks? . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .
u . Range in 3 tes ts at least 10 shocks? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .
v. Three containers dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
w. Correct formula for % moisture used? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
x . Flow curve plotted on semilog with l inear moisture & log of shocks? . . . . . .
y . Liquid l imit equals percent moisture for 25 shocks from curve? . . . . . . . . .. . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Soils-5
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 101/106
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures (Continued)
5. Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index (MRDTM 208)
a. Sample: 20 g of minus 0.475 material? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ..
or, 8 g of Liquid Limit material? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. If 20 g used:
(1) mixed with distilled or demineralized water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) ball formed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
c. Using 8 g sample, ellipsoidal mass formed? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
d. Mass rolled between fingers and plate to form uniform thread? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
e. Rate of rolling 80 to 90 strokes per minutes? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f . When 3 mm thread made, reform ellipsoidal mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
g. Steps d through f repeated until thread crumbles? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
h . Crumbled pieces put in tared containers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i . Sample and container weighed to 0.1 g? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
j . Sample dried to constant mass? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
k. Plastic Limit calculation:
PL = mass of water X 100
mass of oven dry so i l . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .
1. PL reported to the nearest whole number? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
m. PI calculated from: PI = LL - PL .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Soils-6
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 102/106
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures (Continued)
6. Amount of Material Finer than 0.075 mm Sieve in Aggregate (MRDTM 206)
a. Sample obtained by MRDTM 302 and dried to constant mass? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
b. Proper test sample size used and weighed to 0.2%? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .c . Sample placed in container and covered with water and wetting agent? . . . . .
d . Container agitated to complete separation of coarse and f ine part icles?. . . . .
e. Wash water carefully decanted through nest of sieves? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
f . Washed unti l clear and material on s ieves returned to sample?. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
g. Aggregate dried to constant mass and weighed to 0.2%? .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7. Specific Gravity of Soils (MRDTM 207)
A. Sample Preparation:
1. Sample screened to remove all plus 2.00 mm (or 0.425 mm) particles?.
2. Type of sample: Oven-dried? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .
Natural moisture?. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . .
3. Weight of sample (25 g+ for volumetric flasks or 10 g+ for stoppered bottle)? ...........
4 . Prepara tion of oven-dried samples :
(a) sample dried in oven for 12 h or to constant mass? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
(b) cooled in desiccator? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) Sample weighed to 0.01 g (f lask) or 0.001 g (bott le)? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
(d) Sample soaked in dist i l led water for at least 12 h? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
5 . Preparation of clay soils containing natural moisture. Is sample dispersed in
distilled or demineralized water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Soils-7
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 103/106
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures (Continued)
B. Procedure:
1. Sample placed in pycnometer without loss and weighed in pycnometer?.. . .
2 . Pycnometer fi l led from 1/2 to 3/4 full with dist i l led water? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. .
3 . Entrapped air removed by vacuum or by boil ing for 10 minutes? . . . . . . . .. . . .
4. If boiled, pycnometer rolled occasionally and cooled to room temperature after boil? . . . .
5 . Pycnometer f i l led with dis t i l led water and outs ide dried? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
6 . Pycnometer and contents weighed to 0.01 g or 0.001 g at TxC? . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .
7 . If not moisture sample, material removed and oven dried? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .
C. Calculation:
1. Sp. Gr. = mass of oven dry soil
mass of oven dry soil + (W a - Wb)
2 . S p. Gr . a t ( ?) C = K x observed Sp. Gr.? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 . Weighted average used when there is plus 6.25 mm material? . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Soils-8
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 104/106
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 105/106
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures (Continued)
9. The California Bearing Ratio (MRDTM 213)
A. Preparation:
1. Sample of 35 kg or more prepared according to MRDTM 212? . . . . . . .. . . .
2 . 50 mm to 19 mm material replaced with 19 mm to 4.75 mm material?. .
3. Four representative samples selected (1-11 kg and 3-7 kg approximately)? .................
4 . Moisture-Density determined by MRDTM 212 on 11 kg sample? .. . . . . . .
B. Procedure for Making Specimens:
1. These specimens compacted in range of 95 to 100% maximum dry density? ...............
2 . Spacer disk and fi l ter paper in mold before compaction? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
3. 100 or 500 g moisture sample taken at beginning and end of compaction? ..................
4 . Collar removed and soil trimmed even with mold? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
5. Spacer disks removed & specimen inverted on perforated base with filter paper? .......
6 . Mass of specimen, mold, collar and base plate determined? . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .
C. Soaking:
1. Swell plate with annular weights placed on sample? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 .Tripod and dial indicator placed on mold and reading taken? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .
3. Sample soaked 96 h in water 25 mm over top? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 . Dial read at end of soaking and percent swell calculated? . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ..
5. Water poured from top and sample drained down 15 minutes? . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Remarks:
Date Inspector
MRDQS 6.10 Soils-10
Table of Contents
8/12/2019 VIIIPt6
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/viiipt6 106/106
Inspection of Soils Test Procedures (Continued)
D. Penetration:
1 . Weights equal to soaking weights p laced on sample and p is ton seated? . . . .
2 . Pis ton seated with 4.5 kg load and penetration and load dials zeroed?. . . . . .
3 . Load applied at uniform rate of penetration of 1.27 mm/minute? . . . . . . . . .. . .
4 . Load and Penetration read at 0.64, 1.27, 1.9, 2.54, 3.81, 5.08 & 7.62mm penetration? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 . Stress-s train curve prepared and CBR calculated? . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .
Remarks:
Table of Contents