TüKetici Tercihleri - GençEkonomist

download TüKetici Tercihleri - GençEkonomist

of 56

Transcript of TüKetici Tercihleri - GençEkonomist

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    1/56

    2. BLM

    TKETC TERCHLER

    (Consumer Preferences)

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    2/56

    Amalarmz

    Tketici tercihini aklamak Fayda Kavraman aklamak Fiyat ve gelirin nemi Optimal davran Tketici dengesi

    Anahtar kavramlar: Homo-economicus, faydafonksiyonu, farkszlk erileri, marjinal ikameoran, bte Kst, tketici dengesi, gelir ikameetkisi, bireysel talep fonksiyonu

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    3/56

    htiya ve Tketici Tercihleri /Kavramlar

    htita: Karlandnda insanlara haz,karlanmadnda ise elem, ve doyumsuzlukveren duygudur (alk ve susuzluk gibi)

    Mal: nsan ihtiyalarn karlayan her trl fizikivarlk ve hizmetlerdir.

    Tketici: Mal tketerek ihtiyalarn karlayankimsedir.

    Fayda: Mallarn ihtiyalar giderme zelliidir.

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    4/56

    ktisadiAklclk ve Homo-Economicus

    1. Tam bilgiye sahip olma,

    2. Seici olma,

    3. ou aza tercih etme,4. Tercihler arasnda tutarl olma.

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    5/56

    Fayda Kavram

    Mallarn ihtiyalarn giderme zelliidir.

    Kardinal ve ordinal yaklam

    Fayda llebilir [Jevons (1854) ve Walras(1874)]

    Fayda llemez [Edgeworth (1881),Antonelli (1886), rving Fisher (1892)]

    Deer paradoksu?

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    6/56

    Fayda Kavram/TU and MU

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    7/56

    FaydaFonksiyonu

    There are three steps involved in thestudy of consumer behavior

    1. Consumer Preferences To describe how and why people prefer

    one good to another

    2. BudgetConstraints

    People have limited incomes

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    8/56

    Farkszlk Erileri (IndifferenceCurves:An Example)

    Market Basket Units ofFood Units ofClothing

    A 20 30

    B 10 50

    D 40 20

    E 30 40

    G 10 20

    H 10 40

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    9/56

    The consumerprefersA to allcombinationsin the yellow box, while

    allthose in the pinkbox are preferredto A.

    Farkszlk Erileri (IndifferenceCurves:An Example)

    Food

    10

    20

    30

    40

    10 20 30 40

    Clothing

    50

    G

    A

    EH

    B

    D

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    10/56

    Indifferentbetween pointsB, A, & D

    E is preferredto points on U1Pointson U1are preferred toH & G

    Farkszlk Erileri(Indifference Curves:An Example)

    Food

    10

    20

    30

    40

    10 20 30 40

    Clothing

    50

    U1GD

    A

    EH

    B

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    11/56

    Farkszlk Erileri(Indifference Curves)

    Farkszlk erisi zerindeki her nokta, eittoplam fayda

    Mal dzleminin her noktasnda farkszlkerisi geer

    Farkszlk erisi negatiftir

    Orjine dbkeydir

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    12/56

    U2

    U3

    Farkszlk Erileri(Indifference Curves)

    Food

    Clothing

    U1

    ABD

    Market basketAis preferred to B.Market basket B is

    preferred to D.

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    13/56

    Farkszlk Erileri(Indifference Curves)

    Food

    Clothing B is preferred to DA is indifferent to B & DB must be indifferent to

    D but that cant be if B ispreferred to D

    U1

    U1

    U

    2

    U2

    A

    B

    D

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    14/56

    A

    B

    D

    EG

    -1

    -6

    1

    1

    -4

    -21

    1

    Observation: The amountof clothing given up for

    1 unit of food decreasesfrom 6 to 1

    Marjinalkame Oran(Marginal Rate ofSubstitution)

    Food

    Clothing

    2 3 4 51

    2

    4

    6

    8

    1012

    14

    16

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    15/56

    Marjinalkame Oran(Marginal Rate ofSubstitution)

    Food2 3 4 51

    Clothing

    2

    4

    6

    8

    1012

    14

    16 A

    B

    D

    EG

    -6

    1

    1

    11

    -4

    -2-1

    MRS = 6

    MRS = 2

    FCMRS(

    (!

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    16/56

    Azalan Marjinalkame Oran(Marginal Rate ofSubstitution)

    MRS, kaytszlk erisi aa gittikeazalr

    Along an indifference curve there is adiminishing marginal rate of substitution(Azalan marjinal kame erisi)

    The MRS went from 6 to 4 to 1

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    17/56

    MarjinalFayda ve Tketici TercihiMarginal Utilityand ConsumerChoice

    Formally:

    C)(MUF)(MU CF ((!0No change in total utility along an indifference curve.Trade off of one good to the other leaves the consumer

    just as well off.

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    18/56

    Marginal Utilityand ConsumerChoice

    Rearranging:

    CF

    CF

    /MUMUMRS

    saycanWe

    CforFofMRSFC

    SinceMUMUFC

    !

    !((

    !((

    /

    //

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    19/56

    Marginal Utilityand ConsumerChoice

    When consumers maximize satisfaction:

    CF/PPMRS !

    CFCF// UU !

    Since the MRS is also equal to the ratio of themarginal utility of consuming F and C

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    20/56

    Marginal Utilityand ConsumerChoice

    Rearranging, gives the equation for utilitymaximization:

    CCFFPMUPMU // !

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    21/56

    Marjinalkame Oran(Marginal Rate ofSubstitution)

    Two polar cases are of interest Perfect substitutes (MRS sabit)

    Perfect complements (MRS=0)

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    22/56

    Tketici Tercihi/Kaytszlk Erisi

    Orange Juice(glasses)

    AppleJuice

    (glasses)

    2 3 41

    1

    2

    3

    4

    0

    Mkemmel

    kame(Perfect

    Substitutes)

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    23/56

    Tketici Tercihi/Kaytszlk Erisi

    Right Shoes

    LeftShoes

    2 3 41

    1

    2

    3

    4

    0

    Mkemmel Tamamlayc(Perfect

    Complements)

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    24/56

    Tketici Tercihi( ConsumerPreferences)

    These consumersplace a greater

    value onperformancethan styling

    Styling

    Performance

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    25/56

    Tketici Tercihi( ConsumerPreferences

    These consumersplace a greater

    value on styling thanperformance

    Styling

    Performance

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    26/56

    Fayda (Utility)

    Utility function

    Formula that assigns a level of utility to

    individual market baskets If the utility function is

    U(F,C) = F+ 2CA market basket with 8 units of food and 3 units of

    clothing gives a utility of14 = 8 + 2(3)

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    27/56

    Utility - Example

    MarketBasket

    Food Clothing Utility

    A 8 3 8 + 2(3) = 14

    B 6 4 6 + 2(4) = 14

    C 4 4 4 + 2(4) = 12

    Consumer is indifferent between A & B andprefers both to C

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    28/56

    Utility - Example

    Baskets for each level of utility can beplotted to get an indifference curve

    To find the indifference curve for a utility of14, we can change the combinations of foodand clothing that give us a utility of14

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    29/56

    Utility - Example

    Food10 155

    5

    10

    15

    0

    Clothing

    U1 = 25

    U2 = 50

    U3 = 100A

    B

    C

    Basket U = FCC 25 = 2.5(10)A 25 = 5(5)B 25 = 10(2.5)

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    30/56

    ICPFP CF !

    Bte Dorusu (The Budget Line)

    The budget line then can be written:

    All income is allocated to food (F) and/or clothing(C)

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    31/56

    Bte Dorusu (The Budget Line)

    Different choices of food and clothing canbe calculated that use all income

    These choices can be graphed as the budgetline

    Example: Assume income of $80/week, PF = $1 and PC

    = $2

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    32/56

    Bte Kst(Budget Constraints)

    MarketBasket

    Food

    PF = $1

    Clothing

    PC = $2

    IncomeI = PFF + PCC

    A 0 40 $80B 20 30 $80

    D 40 20 $80

    E 60 10 $80

    G 80 0 $80

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    33/56

    C

    F

    P

    P

    F

    CSlope -

    2

    1- !!

    (

    (!

    Bte Dorusu (The Budget Line)

    10

    20

    A

    B

    D

    E

    G

    (I/PC) = 40

    Food40 60 80 = (I/PF)20

    10

    20

    30

    0

    Clothing

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    34/56

    Bte Dorusu (The Budget Line)

    YXP

    P

    P

    M

    YPXPM

    YPXPM

    Y

    X

    Y

    YX

    YX

    !

    !

    !

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    35/56

    Bte Dorusu Deiimi(The Budget Line Changes)

    An increase inincome shifts

    the budget line

    outward

    Food(units per week)

    Clothing(units

    per week)

    80 120 16040

    20

    40

    60

    80

    0

    (I = $160)L2

    (I = $80)

    L1

    L3

    (I =$40)

    A decrease inincome shifts

    the budget lineinward

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    36/56

    Fiyat Deiiminin Etkisi(The Effects ofChangesin Prices)

    The Effects of Changes in Prices If the price of one good decreases, the

    budget line shifts outward, pivoting from the

    other goods intercept. If the price of food decreases and you buy

    only food (x-intercept), then you can buymore food. The x-intercept shifts out.

    If you buy only clothing (y-intercept), you canbuy the same amount. No change in y-intercept.

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    37/56

    Fiyat Deiiminin Etkisi(The Effects ofChangesin Prices)

    (PF = 1)

    L1

    An increase in theprice of food to$2.00 changesthe slope of the

    budget line androtates it inward.

    L3

    (PF= 2)(PF = 1/2)

    L2

    A decrease in theprice of food to$.50 changes

    the slope of thebudget line and

    rotates it outward.

    40Food(units per week)

    Clothing(units

    per week)

    80 120 160

    40

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    38/56

    Fiyat Deiiminin Etkisi /Talepfonk

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    39/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    Given preferences and budgetconstraints, how do consumers choose

    what to buy?Consumers choose a combination of

    goods that will maximize theirsatisfaction, given the limited budget

    available to them

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    40/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    The maximizing market basket mustsatisfy two conditions:

    1. It must be located on the budget line They spend all their income more is better

    2. It must give the consumer the mostpreferred combination of goods and

    services

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    41/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    Graphically, we can see differentindifference curves of a consumer

    choosing between clothing and foodRemember that U3 > U2 > U1 for our

    indifference curves

    Consumer wants to choose highest utility

    within their budget

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    42/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    U3

    D

    C

    Food(units per week)40 8020

    Clothing(units per

    week)

    20

    30

    40

    0

    U1

    A

    B

    A, B, C on budget lineD highest utility but notaffordableC highest affordableutilityConsumer chooses C

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    43/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    Consumer will choose highestindifference curve on budget line

    In previous graph, point C is where theindifference curve is just tangent to thebudget line

    Slope of the budget line equals the slope

    of the indifference curve at this point

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    44/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    Recall, the slope of an indifference curveis:

    F

    CMRS(

    (!

    C

    F

    P

    PSlope !

    Further, the slope of the budget line is:

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    45/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    Therefore, it can be said at consumersoptimal consumption point,

    y

    C

    F

    PPxMRS

    P

    PMRS

    !

    !

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    46/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    It can be said that satisfaction ismaximized when marginal rate of

    substitution (ofFandC) is equal to theratio of the prices (ofFandC)

    Note this is ONLY true at the optimalconsumption point

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    47/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    Optimal consumption point is wheremarginal benefits equal marginal costs

    MB = MRS = benefit associated withconsumption of1 more unit of food

    MC = cost of additional unit of food 1 unit food = unit clothing

    PF/PC

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    48/56

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    49/56

    Tketici Tercihi (ConsumerChoice)

    Food (units per week)

    Clothing(units per

    week)

    40 8020

    20

    30

    40

    0

    PointB does notmaximize satisfaction

    because the

    MRS = -10/10 = 1is greaterthan theprice ratio = 1/2

    +10F U1

    -10C

    B

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    50/56

    ConsumerChoice:An Application Revisited

    Consider two groups of consumers, eachwishing to spend $10,000 on the styling

    and performance of a carEach group has different preferences

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    51/56

    ConsumerChoice:An Application Revisited

    Styling

    Performance$10,000

    $10,000 These consumerswant performance

    worth $7000 and styling

    worth $3000

    $3,000

    $7,000

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    52/56

    ConsumerChoice:An Application Revisited

    These consumerswant styling worth

    $7000 and

    performance worth$3000

    $3,000

    $7,000

    Styling

    $10,000

    $10,000

    Performance

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    53/56

    Gelirtketim erisi/Engel Erisi

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    54/56

    Gelirkame (Hicks Yaklam)

    Figure 4-6: The Total Effect

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    55/56

    Figure 4-6: The Total Effectofa Price Increase

  • 8/9/2019 TKetici Tercihleri - GenEkonomist

    56/56