Mini Homeplus vs U.I MarketPrice comparison

201101948 이종혁201101949 이창열201101862 곽준혁

1. Topic and selected topics reason2. Data for investigation3. Analysis using ‘spss’4. Conclusions and finish

INDEX

1. Topic and selected topics rea-son

01

PRESENTATION

Mini Homeplus

U.I Market

2. Data for investigation

02

Survey method The directing survey of the identical product between at mini-homeplus and at UI-market.

Sample size mini-homeplus’s 25 product( n₁ = 25 ) UI-market`s 25 product( n₂ = 25 )

Sampling method Simple random sampling

Hypothesis : H0: The price average will be the same between in mini-pomeplus’s and in UI-market’s H0 : μ1 – μ2 = 0 H1: The price average will be different between in mini-homeplus’s and UI-market’s H1 : μ1 – μ2 ≠ 0

Significant level : 5%

Sample Size = 25

Degree of Freedom = 48

Rejection Range : t<= -2.011 or t>=2.011

3. Analysis using ‘spss’

03

AnalysisSnack & bever-

ageUNIVERSITY OF

INCHEON MARKETHOME PLUS EXPRESS

(MINI HOME PLUS)오징어 짚 750 600

자갈치 750 600꼬깔콘 1350 1200짱구 700 670

프링글스 2500 2500감자깡 800 610포스틱 850 800스윙칩 1350 1260수미칩 2000 1680포카칩 1350 1260

눈을 감자 1800 1670나초 ( 초록 ) 1100 1010

나초 오리지널 1350 960떡볶이 과자 1300 1180

양파링 800 740비타민 워러 1500 1680

데일리 레몬 스파클링 1200 1140자연은 알로에 700 700자연은 석류 700 840

포카리스웨트 ( 캔 ) 600 850게토레이 ( 캔 ) 600 600

환타 ( 캔 ) 600 620웰치스 700 900

빙그레 바나나 우유 1000 980코카콜라 ( 캔 ) 600 700

Analysis

가게 N Mean Std. DeviationStd. Error

Mean상품 1.00 25 1078.0000 493.51629 98.70326

2.00 25 1028.7200 458.84743 91.76949

Group Statistics

Analysis

0.368

2.011- 2.011

4. Conclusions and finish

04

Result & Ending

The figure of t-value is 0.366. that is included in the critical value, 2.011. it means the figure of t is not included in re-jection range. Therefore we can’t reject null Hypothesis. As a result, there is no gap of the price between UI-market and mini-homeplus.

So,U.I’s market cheap enough to Mini homeplus.

Let often used^.^

THANK YOU