Student Vital Actions - SERPmath.serpmedia.org/5x8card/assets/5x8_card_o.pdf · All students...
Transcript of Student Vital Actions - SERPmath.serpmedia.org/5x8card/assets/5x8_card_o.pdf · All students...
Stud
ent
Vita
l Act
ions
Prin
cipl
es
All
stud
ents
par
tici
pate
(e.g
., bo
ys a
nd g
irls
, ELL
and
sp
ecia
l nee
ds s
tude
nts)
, not
just
the
hand
-rai
sers
. Eq
uity
requ
ires
part
icip
atio
n.A
➤
Stud
ents
say
a s
econ
d se
nten
ce (s
pont
aneo
usly
or
prom
pted
by
the
teac
her
or a
noth
er s
tude
nt) t
o ex
tend
and
exp
lain
thei
r th
inki
ng.
CCSS
-M p
ract
ices
1 |
2 |
3 |
6
Logi
c co
nnec
ts
sent
ence
s.B ➤
Stud
ents
tal
k ab
out
each
oth
er’s
thi
nkin
g (n
ot ju
st th
eir
own)
.
CCSS
-M p
ract
ices
1 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
7 |
8
Und
erst
andi
ng e
ach
othe
r’s re
ason
ing
deve
lops
reas
onin
g pr
ofici
ency
. C ➤
Stud
ents
rev
ise
thei
r th
inki
ng, a
nd th
eir
wri
tten
wor
k
incl
udes
revi
sed
expl
anat
ions
and
just
ifica
tions
. CC
SS-M
pra
ctic
es 1
| 2
| 3
| 4
Revi
sing
exp
lana
tions
sol
idifi
es
unde
rsta
ndin
g.D
➤
Stud
ents
look
for
mor
e pr
ecis
e w
ays
of e
xpre
ssin
g th
eir
thin
king
, en
cour
agin
g ea
ch o
ther
to lo
ok fo
r an
d us
e ac
adem
ic la
ngua
ge.
CCS
S-M
pra
ctic
es 3
| 6
Acad
emic
lang
uage
pro
mot
es
prec
ise
thin
king
.E ➤
Engl
ish
lear
ners
pro
duce
lang
uage
that
com
mun
icat
es
idea
s an
d re
ason
ing,
eve
n w
hen
that
lang
uage
is im
perf
ect.
CCSS
-M p
ract
ices
1 |
2 |
3 |
6
ELLs
dev
elop
lang
uage
thro
ugh
expl
anat
ion.
F ➤
Stud
ents
eng
age
and
pers
ever
e
at p
oint
s of
diffi
culty
, cha
lleng
e, o
r er
ror.
C
CSS-
M p
ract
ice
1
Prod
uctiv
e st
rugg
le
prod
uces
gro
wth
.G
➤
Abo
ut L
ooki
ng fo
r St
anda
rds
in t
he M
athe
mat
ics
Clas
sroo
mTh
e Co
mm
on C
ore
Stat
e St
anda
rds
(CCS
S) d
e!ne
eig
ht s
tand
ards
for
stud
ents
‘ Mat
hem
atic
al P
ract
ice.
You
will
!nd
evi
denc
e of
the
stud
ents
’ pra
ctic
es b
y ob
serv
ing
thei
r ac
tions
and
by
revi
ewin
g th
eir
wor
k. T
his
card
is in
tend
ed to
focu
s at
tent
ion
on s
ome
of th
e vi
tal s
tude
nt a
ctio
ns th
at w
ill b
e ob
serv
able
in
CCSS
-M c
lass
room
s (s
ee re
vers
e). H
owev
er, n
ot a
ll st
anda
rds
will
be
evid
ent a
t all
times
or
appl
icab
le fo
r ev
ery
activ
ity.
The
prac
tices
are
ava
ilabl
e at
cor
esta
ndar
ds.o
rg
A !
Equi
ty r
equi
res
part
icip
atio
n: E
xpla
inin
g on
e's
idea
s an
d he
arin
g th
e re
actio
ns o
f oth
ers
prom
otes
lear
ning
. Thu
s in
cla
ssro
oms
in w
hich
a fe
w
stud
ents
do
all t
he ta
lkin
g, le
arni
ng o
ppor
tuni
ties
are
dist
ribu
ted
ineq
uita
bly.
Ove
r tim
e si
lent
stu
dent
s m
ay c
ome
to b
elie
ve th
ey a
re n
ot e
xpec
ted
to ta
lk, a
nd m
ay d
isen
gage
ent
irely
. Whe
n al
l stu
dent
s ar
e gi
ven
the
time
to e
xpla
in th
eir
thin
king
, a g
reat
er in
vest
men
t of e
very
stu
dent
in th
e in
stru
ctio
nal a
ctiv
ity is
dem
ande
d an
d re
war
ded,
and
the
oppo
rtun
ity fo
r st
uden
ts to
ser
ve a
s le
arni
ng re
sour
ces
for
each
oth
er is
max
imiz
ed. "
B !
Logi
c co
nnec
ts s
ente
nces
: A h
allm
ark
of th
e un
ders
tand
ing
prio
ritiz
ed b
y th
e CC
SS-M
is th
e ab
ility
to u
se m
athe
mat
ical
reas
onin
g to
con
stru
ct a
nd
defe
nd a
n ar
gum
ent (
this
is w
hat I
did
and
why
it m
akes
sen
se).
Brie
f, si
ngle
-sen
tenc
e st
uden
t utt
eran
ces
are
gene
rally
insu#
cien
t for
a v
iabl
e ar
gum
ent.
C !
Und
erst
andi
ng e
ach
othe
r’s r
easo
ning
dev
elop
s re
ason
ing
pro!
cien
cy: S
tude
nts
lear
n ab
out m
athe
mat
ics
by e
xplo
ring
thei
r ow
n an
d ot
hers
' re
ason
ing
in p
robl
em-s
olvi
ng s
ituat
ions
. Act
ivel
y lis
teni
ng to
pee
rs in
crea
ses
the
time
focu
sed
on m
athe
mat
ical
thin
king
and
pro
mot
es th
e co
gniti
ve $
exib
ility
that
is h
ighl
y va
lued
in c
olle
ge a
nd c
aree
r."
D !
Revi
sing
exp
lana
tion
s so
lidi!
es u
nder
stan
ding
: As
stud
ents
bec
ome
mor
e m
athe
mat
ical
ly p
ro!c
ient
and
thei
r re
ason
ing
impr
oves
, the
y sh
ould
be
abl
e to
iden
tify $a
ws
in th
eir
own
and
othe
rs' t
hink
ing.
Rev
isin
g w
ork
as a
rout
ine
mat
ter
lead
s to
bet
ter
prob
lem
sol
ving
.
E !
Acad
emic
lang
uage
pro
mot
es p
reci
se th
inki
ng: M
athe
mat
ical
ly p
ro!c
ient
stu
dent
s co
mpr
ehen
d an
d pr
oduc
e m
athe
mat
ical
repr
esen
tatio
ns
(sym
bolic
exp
ress
ions
, gra
phs,
tabl
es, n
umbe
r lin
es, e
tc.)
that
are
em
bedd
ed in
ord
inar
y an
d ac
adem
ic e
xpla
natio
ns a
nd ju
sti!
catio
ns. S
tude
nts
com
preh
end
and
prod
uce
the
para
grap
hs, s
ente
nces
, phr
ases
and
wor
ds c
hara
cter
istic
of j
usti!
catio
ns, e
xpla
natio
ns a
nd w
ord
prob
lem
s ty
pica
l fo
r th
eir
grad
e le
vel.
F !
ELLs
dev
elop
lang
uage
thro
ugh
expl
anat
ion:
Eng
lish
lear
ners
may
hes
itate
to s
peak
in c
lass
pre
cise
ly b
ecau
se th
eir
cont
rol o
f Eng
lish
is li
mite
d.
But p
ract
ice
spea
king
allo
ws
them
to b
ecom
e m
ore
pro!
cien
t. Br
idgi
ng th
e la
ngua
ge b
arri
er is
impo
rtan
t for
ELL
s to
thri
ve in
the
type
s of
cl
assr
oom
s th
e CC
SS-M
pro
mot
es.
G !
Prod
ucti
ve s
trug
gle
prod
uces
gro
wth
: Whe
n st
uden
ts"p
ersi
st in
mak
ing
sens
e of
a c
halle
ngin
g pr
oble
m a
nd tr
ying
di%
eren
t str
ateg
ies
for
solu
tion,
th
ey a
re m
ore
likel
y to
lear
n th
e m
athe
mat
ics
than
stu
dent
s w
ho g
ive
up q
uick
ly o
r av
oid
chal
leng
e to
the
grea
test
ext
ent p
ossi
ble.
mat
h.se
rpm
edia
.org
/5x8
card
re
vise
d 9/
26/1
4