Relating Science and Technology 科學與科技的關係 Science and Technology (S4-5) Teacher...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
237 -
download
0
Transcript of Relating Science and Technology 科學與科技的關係 Science and Technology (S4-5) Teacher...
Relating Science and Technology
科學與科技的關係
Science and Technology (S4-5)Teacher Development Programme 2006
Science <+=> Technology
Definition
Technology is a word with origins in the Greek word technologia (techne “craft” and logia “saying.”) It is a broad term dealing with the use and knowledge of humanity's tools and crafts.
Adapted from: Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology
Similarities Between Science and Technology
Science Planned and
organised process Build upon previous
discoveries Relies on creativity to
formulate new hypothesis
Endless quest
Technology Planned and
organised process Build upon previous
inventions Relies on creativity to
generate new solution Forever perfection
Differences Between Science and Technology
Science Explains and predicts Establishes laws and
theories Intangible Measured by how well it
predicts Less direct benefits and
devastations to our lives Common to the humanity
Technology Improves the quality of
lives Delivers products and
Processes Tangible and intangible Measured by how big the
improvement and how small the drawback
More direct benefits and devastations to our lives
Often proprietary
The Economy of Science and Technology
Activity: Have you heard of?
Chief Technology Officer 数码21
2006-2020年国家信息化发展战略
国家高技术产业发展项目计划
自主创新 Incubators
863计划
Technology Evangelists
The Long Tail
Institutionalisation of Technological Innovation
Individual effort before Industrial Revolution Industrial Enterprises and Modern University
took up the role After WWII big investment not affordable by
individuals or private sector Government coordination in the form of National
innovation strategy Shall we prioritise pure-science researches by
their potential benefit?
Organisation of Research and Development
Social-economic NeedsUltimate Answer
Corporate Research
Product Development
FundamentalResearch
AppliedResearch
Corporate Research and Development
(R&D)
National Innovation
Strategy
Corporate Research
Product Development
FundamentalResearch
AppliedResearch
Partial Physics and Super-Conductivity
LHC Collider, CERN, EU
Genetics and Computing
Corporate Research
Product Development
FundamentalResearch
AppliedResearch
Blue Gene, IBM
Human Genome Project, DOE, USA
Biological-Nano-Information-Cognitive Technologies
Corporate Research
Product Development
FundamentalResearch
AppliedResearch
Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance, NSF/DOC, USA
Micro-Fabrication Technologies
Corporate Research
Product Development
FundamentalResearch
AppliedResearch
Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration
Thomas A. Edison
Micro-level
Macro-level
Activity: Patent Champions
Patent application is a common indicator of technological innovation performance. On the worksheet is a list of 2005 world top 50 patent applicants
How many countries does the top 50 belong to and who are they?
Which country has the most champions? How many companies have you heard of? Can you spot any Chinese champion? Which one do you think is the patent champion?
1 NL KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.
2492
2 JP MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.
2021
3 DE SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT 1402
4 FI NOKIA CORPORATION 898
5 DE ROBERT BOSCH GMBH 843
6 US INTEL CORPORATION 691
7 DE BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT 656
8 US 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY 603
9 US MOTOROLA, INC. 580
10 DE DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG 567
11 US EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY 531
12 US HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. 518
13 SE TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (publ)
510
14 KR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 483
15 US THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 461
16 JP SONY CORPORATION 449
17 JP MITSUBISHI DENKI KABUSHIKI KAISHA 436
18 US E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY 423
19 JP TOYOTA JIDOSHA KABUSHIKI KAISHA 399
20 FR THOMSON LICENSING S.A. 390
21 US QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 379
22 US INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
374
23 JP FUJITSU LIMITED 358
24 US HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
358
25 JP NEC CORPORATION 353
26 DE INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 345
27 US THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
343
28 US KIMBERLY-CLARK WORLDWIDE, INC. 336
29 KR LG ELECTRONICS INC. 332
30 US GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 321
31 DE PHILIPS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & STANDARDS GMBH
319
32 DE BAYER HEALTHCARE AG 310
33 JP JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY 304
34 JP OLYMPUS CORPORATION 295
35 JP CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA 269
36 JP SHARP KABUSHIKI KAISHA 269
37 CN HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. 249
38 US MEDTRONIC, INC. 245
39 JP PIONEER CORPORATION 240
40 CH NOVARTIS AG 227
41 JP HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD. 224
42 SE ASTRAZENECA AB 216
43 DE BSH BOSCH UND SIEMENS HAUSGERÄTE GMBH
215
44 US CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC. 212
45 JP TOKYO ELECTRON LIMITED 205
46 FR COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE 202
47 US HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC. 200
48 JP SHOWA DENKO K.K. 194
49 JP DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD. 194
50 US MERCK & CO., INC. 189
Adapted from: World Intellectual Property Organization
Discussion
The list of champion countries do not match the G8* list, why?
Why there’s few defence industries on the list?
Can you think of a better technological innovation indicator?
*The Group of Eight (G8) consists of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Together, these countries represent about 65% of the world economy
Recap
Technological Innovation is becoming the prime driving force behind economic growth
Scientific inquiry and technological innovation is becoming so expensive that it cannot be sustained alone by either governments, universities, or private sectors
Innovation must be Strategized and Managed by governments as well as corporate
Technological InnovationS-curve
From Research to Market
Development is equally important as Research The successful conversion of a piece of scientific
and technological finding into a product in our everyday life needs to take into consideration of factors such as cost, risks, benefits, ethical issues, marketing strategies, etc. Innovator / Entrepreneur is the person who pushes the technology into realisation
The conversion and subsequent utilization of technologies can be characterized by an S-Curve
Technology S Curve
Time
Utilization
Take off
Mature
Obsolescent
Niche
Failure
Re-introduction
Introduction
Introduction
There is a group of users call early-adopters who are willing to try just anything new on the market
Early adopters make up the majority of users at the Introduction stage
Companies provide incentives to attract adopters
Success in this stage is important but does not guarantee later success
Can you think of early-adopters in Environmental and health fields?
RFID application, Prada Epicenter
Motorola iDEN Technology Joba, Panasonic
Niche and Failure
A lot of technologies never take-off. Their funding dried-up and the companies pull them off the shelf
Different technologies fail differently. Common reasons are high price and incorrect prediction of market size
One interesting reason of failure is its incapability to break the lock-on effect created by existing technology
In some cases although the technology lacks the critical-mass to take-off, the technology can sustain its existence by selling to a niche market
Newton PDA, Apple Computer
Concord
EV1, General Motor
Viagra, Pfizar
Take-off
A few lucky technologies will be able to leap through the chasm and experience a phase of exponential growth
The take-off is typically fueled by the Network Effect, which means every extra adopter will double the benefit of the entire adopter community
The network effect will suck up almost all the profit in its path and drive many old technologies into obsolescent
The technology improvement during the take-off and mature stage is usually evolutionary, or sustaining
The change brought by the take-off of some technologies were great enough to trigger Creative Destruction, which can shape the development of our society
Octopus Card
Mobile Phone
Oral Contraceptive
Low fuel-consumption engine
Peer-to-peer networks
Obsolescent
All technologies will be obsoleted eventually New entrant will bring more superior
technology to the market Social-economical changes will diminish or
wipe away the market entirely
More and more companies accept the fate and take pre-emptive measures to control the effect of technology obsolescent, which sometime called Planned obsolescent
Polaroid Discman, Sony
Video Cassette Recorder 35mm filmroll
Re-introduction
By retargeting a technology, it is possible to find new growth and avoid obsolescent
Technologies can be re-introduced to the same market but targeting different segment, or introduced to a new market
Some of the re-introduction are disruptive or revolutionary in nature, in this can the history may come a full-circle and a new take-off is born
Cellulose, Eastman 3G Mobile Phone
Prius Hybrid Car, Toyota Wii, Nitendo
Recap
The conversion and subsequent utilization of technologies can be characterized by an S-Curve
The successful conversion of scientific and technological finding into a product needs to take into consideration of factors such as cost, risks, benefits, ethical issues, marketing strategies, etc.
Corporate must strategize and manage a health supply of new innovation to replace obsoleted technologies