PX0674
-
Upload
legalmatters -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of PX0674
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
1/59
PX0674PX0674
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
2/59
Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney GeneralCalifornia Department of Justice
Division of California Justice Information ServicesBureau of Criminal Information and AnalysisCRIMINAL JUSTICE STATISTICS CENTER
Hate
Crimeti-National Origin, Anti-Religion, Anti-Sexual Orientation, Anti-Physical/Menta
ity, Anti-Race/Ethnicity, Anti-white, Anti-black, Anti-Hispanic, Anti-American Iskan Native, Anti-Asian/Pacifc Islander, Anti-multiple races/group, Anti-other ethional origin, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Catholic, Anti-Protestant, Anti-Islamic (Muslim)er religion, Anti-other religion, Anti-multiple religious, group, Anti-atheism/agti-male homosexual (gay), Anti-female homosexual, Anti-homosexual, Anti-hxual, Anti-bisexual, Anti-physical disability, Anti-mental disability, Anti-male,male, Anti-transgender, Anti-National Origin, Anti-Religion, Anti-Sexual Orienti-Physical/Mental Disability, Anti-Race/Ethnicity, Anti-white, Anti-black, Anti-Histi-American Indian/Alaskan Native, Anti-Asian/Pacifc Islander, Anti-multiple
up, Anti-other ethnicity/national origin, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Catholic, Anti-Proteti-Islamic (Muslim), Anti-other religion, Anti-other religion, Anti-multiple relup, Anti-atheism/agnostic, Anti-male homosexual (gay), Anti-female homosti-homosexual, Anti-heterosexual, Anti-bisexual, Anti-physical disability, Anti-mability, Anti-male, Anti-female, Anti-transgender, Anti-National Origin, Anti-Reti-Sexual Orientation, Anti-Physical/Mental Disability, Anti-Race/Ethnicity, Anti-ti-black, Anti-Hispanic, Anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native, Anti-Asian/ander, Anti-multiple races/group, Anti-other ethnicity/national origin, Anti-Jti-Catholic, Anti-Protestant, Anti-Islamic (Muslim), Anti-other religion, Anti
gion, Anti-multiple religious, group, Anti-atheism/agnostic, Anti-male homoy), Anti-female homosexual, Anti-homosexual, Anti-heterosexual, Anti-bisexuaysical disability, Anti-mental disability, Anti-male, Anti-female, Anti-transgendetional Origin, Anti-Religion, Anti-Sexual Orientation, Anti-Physical/Mental Dis
In
CalIfornIa
2006
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
3/59
Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney GeneralCalifornia Department of Justice
Division of California Justice Information ServicesBureau of Criminal Information and AnalysisCRIMINAL JUSTICE STATISTICS CENTER
An electronic version of this report and other reports are available on the California Attorney Generals website:
http://ag.ca.gov
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
4/59
ti-National Origin, Anti-Religion, Anti-Sexual Orientation, Anti-Physical/Mentaity, Anti-Race/Ethnicity, Anti-white, Anti-black, Anti-Hispanic, Anti-American I
skan Native, Anti-Asian/Pacifc Islander, Anti-multiple races/group, Anti-other ethional origin, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Catholic, Anti-Protestant, Anti-Islamic (Muslim)er religion, Anti-other religion, Anti-multiple religious, group, Anti-atheism/agti-male homosexual (gay), Anti-female homosexual, Anti-homosexual, Anti-hxual, Anti-bisexual, Anti-physical disability, Anti-mental disability, Anti-male,male, Anti-transgender, Anti-National Origin, Anti-Religion, Anti-Sexual Orienti-Physical/Mental Disability, Anti-Race/Ethnicity, Anti-white, Anti-black, Anti-Histi-American Indian/Alaskan Native, Anti-Asian/Pacifc Islander, Anti-multiple up, Anti-other ethnicity/national origin, Anti-Jewish, Anti-Catholic, Anti-Prote
ti-Islamic (Muslim), Anti-other religion, Anti-other religion, Anti-multiple relup, Anti-atheism/agnostic, Anti-male homosexual (gay), Anti-female homosti-homosexual, Anti-heterosexual, Anti-bisexual, Anti-physical disability, Anti-mability, Anti-male, Anti-female, Anti-transgender, Anti-National Origin, Anti-Reti-Sexual Orientation, Anti-Physical/Mental Disability, Anti-Race/Ethnicity, Anti-ti-black, Anti-Hispanic, Anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native, Anti-Asian/ander, Anti-multiple races/group, Anti-other ethnicity/national origin, Anti-Jti-Catholic, Anti-Protestant, Anti-Islamic (Muslim), Anti-other religion, Antigion, Anti-multiple religious, group, Anti-atheism/agnostic, Anti-male homo
y), Anti-female homosexual, Anti-homosexual, Anti-heterosexual, Anti-bisexuaysical disability, Anti-mental disability, Anti-male, Anti-female, Anti-transgendetional Origin, Anti-Religion, Anti-Sexual Orientation, Anti-Physical/Mental Disti-Race/Ethnicity, Anti-white, Anti-black, Anti-Hispanic, Anti-American Indian/A
Hate
Crime
2006
In
CalIfornIa
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
5/59
ii HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
The role of the Criminal Justice Statistics Center is to:
Collect, analyze, and report statistical data which provide valid measures of crime
and the criminal justice process.
Examine these data on an ongoing basis to better describe crime and the criminal
justice system.
Promote the responsible presentation and use of crime statistics.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEEdmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General
DIVISION OF CALIFORNIA JUSTICE INFORMATION SERVICESGary Cooper, Director
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL INFORMATION AND ANALYSISJulie Basco, Acting Bureau ChiefGeorgia Fong, Assistant Bureau Chief
HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006Laura Towse, Principal AnalystTad Davis, Graphics/Design
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
6/59
CONTENTS 1
Introduction .............................................................. 2Highlights ................................................................. 3
Crime Data, 2006
Overview ............................................................. 6
Bias Motivation .................................................... 9
Race/Ethnicity/National Origin ............................ 9
Type of Crime ...................................................... 10
Violent Crime ....................................................... 10
Property Crime .................................................... 10
Location ............................................................... 11Type of Victim ...................................................... 11
Prosecutorial Data, 2006
Hate Crime Prosecution Dispositions, 2006 ........ 14
Total Cases Referred .......................................... 15
Total Cases Filed for Prosecution ....................... 15
Total Dispositions ................................................ 16
Hate Crime Convictions ...................................... 16
Trend DataEvents, Offenses, Victims, and Known
Suspects, 19972006 ..................................... 18
Bias Motivation Categories, 20012006 ............. 20
Selected Bias Motivation Offenses, 20012006 ... 21
Type of Crime, 20012006 .................................. 22
Violent Crime, 20012006 ................................... 23
Property Crime, 20012006 ................................ 24
Location of Crime, 20012006 ............................ 25
List of tABLEs
Hate Crime, 2006
Table N1 Summary of Total Events, Offenses,Victims, and Known Suspects ........... 8
Table 1 Events, Offenses, Victims, and
Known Suspects by Bias Motivation .. 28
Table 2 Offenses by Type of Crime ................. 29Table 3 Events, Offenses, Victims, and
Known Suspects by Location.............. 30
Table 4 Victim Type by Bias Motivation ........... 31
Table 5 Victim Type by Location ...................... 32
Table 6 Events, Offenses, Victims, andKnown Suspects by County andJurisdiction ........................................... 33
Table 7A Summary of Cases Referred by Law
Enforcement Agencies and Type ofFilings ................................................... 39
Table 7B Summary of Hate Crime Dispositions 39
Table 8 Cases Referred by Law EnforcementAgencies and Type of Filings ............. 40
Table 9 Hate Crime Case Dispositions ............ 42
Hate Crime, 19972006Table N2 Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known
Suspects .............................................. 19
Table 10 Hate Crime Case Complaints Filedand Total Convictions .......................... 43
Table 11 Events by Bias Motivation................... 44
Table 12 Offenses by Bias Motivation ............... 45
Table 13 Offenses by Type of Crime ................. 46
Table 14 Offenses by Location........................... 47
Appendices
1 Background ........................................................ 50
2 California Penal Code Section 13023 .............. 51
3 Data Characteristics and KnownLimitations ...................................................... 52
4 Methodology ...................................................... 54
5 Criminal Justice Glossary ................................. 55
CONTENTS
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
7/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
2 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
INTRODUCTION
In 1986, the California Department of Justice (DOJ) rstrecognized the importance of hate crime statistics inCalifornia in a report submitted to the legislature, in
response to Senate Bill 2080 (Watson), which providedrecommendations for preliminary steps to establish a
statewide hate crime database (Appendix 1). CaliforniaPenal Code section 13023 (Appendix 2) requires the
Attorney General to submit an annual report to the Leg-islature regarding crimes motivated by the victims race,ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national
origin, or physical or mental disability as reported by lawenforcement agencies.
The Attorney Generals Hate Crime Reporting Programwas implemented in September 1994. Data collectionbegan in the fall of 1994 after an orientation and trainingperiod was provided by the DOJ. Agencies were
requested to identify and submit all reports of hate crimesoccurring on or after July 1 to December 31, 1994 to the
DOJ. In 1995, California District Attorneys began to reporthate crime prosecutorial information to the DOJ, including
total cases referred, hate crime case lings, criminal case
lings, hate crime convictions and other convictions. In1995, the DOJ published its rst report.
As dened in California Penal Code section 422.55,
hate crimemeans a criminal act committed, in whole or
in part, because of one or more of the following actualor perceived characteristics of the victim: 1) disability,
2) gender, 3) nationality, 4) race or ethnicity, 5) religion,6) sexual orientation, 7) association with a person orgroup with one or more of these actual or perceived
characteristics. Law enforcement agency crime reportsand a web-enabled data collection system are used to
submit hate crime data to the DOJ. Each crime report
includes information about, but is not limited to, biasmotivation, type of crime, location of crime, number ofvictims, and the number of known suspects.
All police agencies and district attorney offices inCalifornia, in cooperation with the DOJ, have developed
local data collection programs and submitted the hatecrime statistics for this 2006 edition of Hate Crime in
California.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
8/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
HIGHLIGHTS 3
HIGHLIGHTS
in 2006:
Hae crme even decreased 6.5 percent from
1,397 in 2005 to 1,306 in 2006.
Hae crme ene increased 0.7 percentfrom 1,691 in 2005 to 1,702 in 2006.
the number vcm of reported hate crimes
decreased 1.8 percent from 1,640 in 2005 to1,611 in 2006.
the number knwn upec of reported
hate crimes increased 1.4 percent from 1,589 in2005 to 1,612 in 2006.
in 2006:
A al 363 hae crme cae were reerred precur: From the 334 cases led
by District Attorney and City Attorney ofces for
prosecution, 272 were led as hate crimes
and 62 were led as non-bias motivated
crimes. For the 249 cases with a dispositionavailable for this report, 140 were hate crime
convictions, 78 were other convictions, and 31were not convicted.
*Anti-other ethnicity/national origin includes Arab or MiddleEastern bias motivated hate crimes.
CRIME DATA
in 2006:
seual r enan hate crime eventsdecreased 3.5 percent from 255 in 2005 to 246
in 2006.
An-whe hate crime events decreased 16.9percent from 77 in 2005 to 64 in 2006.
An-black hate crime events decreased 11.8percent from 490 in 2005 to 432 in 2006.
An-her ehncy/nanal rgn* hate
crime events increased 5.6 percent from 89 in2005 to 94 in 2006.
Race/ehnc y/nanal rg n hate crimeoffenses have consistently been the largest
bias motivation category of hate crimes since1997, accounting for at least 60 percent of all
hate crime offenses. Within this category, anti-blackhate crimes continue to be the largest
bias motivation accounting for at least 26
percent of these offenses every year since1997.
seual r enan hate crime offenses
have consistently been the second largestbias motivation category of hate crimes since
1997, accounting for at least 18 percent of allhate crime offenses. Within this category, anti-
male homosexual (gay) hate crimes continue tobe the largest bias motivation accounting for atleast 11 percent of these offenses every year
since 1997.
Relgn hate crime offenses have consistently
been the third largest bias motivation categoryof hate crimes since 1997, accounting for atleast 12 percent of all hate crime offenses.
Within this category, anti-Jewish hate crimescontinue to be the largest bias motivation
accounting for at least 7 percent of theseoffenses every year since 1997.
BIAS MOTIVATION
TYPE OF CRIME
PROSECUTORIAL DATA
TREND DATA
in 2006:
Vlen crme offenses decreased 4.7 percentfrom 1,096 in 2005 to 1,044 in 2006.
Prpery crme offenses increased 10.6
percent from 595 in 2005 to 658 in 2006.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
9/59
C r I M E
DaTa
Hate
Crime
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
10/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
Source: Tables 1, 8, 9, and 10.Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
HAtE CRiME iN CALifoRNiA, 2006overvew
fgure 1
HAtE CRiMEEVENts
1,306
100.0%
An-
Race/Ehncy/Nanal org n
84464.6%
An-Relgn
20515.7%
An-seual
orenan
24618.8%
An-Dably
30.2%
An-Gender
8
0.6%
6 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
11/59
CRI ME DATA
CRIME DATA 7
HAtE CRiME oVERViEW
in 2006:
There were 1,306 hate crime eventsreported by law enforcement agencies.
The most prominent bias motivation wasanti-race/ethnicity/national origin (64.6percent), followed by anti-sexual orientation(18.8 percent), anti-religion (15.7 percent),and anti-disability and gender (0.8 percent).
There were 363 hate crime cases referredby law enforcement agencies toprosecutors. Of the number referred toprosecutors, 272 cases were led for hatecrime prosecution.
There were 140 hate crime convictions.
Crmnal Cae
flng
33492.0%
Cae
Rejeced
298.0%
Hae Crme
Cae WhDp n
249
91.5%
NCnvced
3112.4%
Hae CrmeCnvcn
14056.2%
oherCnvcn
7831.3%
Hae CrmeEven
Reerred
Precur
363100.0%
Notes:Relating the number of hate crimes reported bylaw enforcement agencies to the number of hate crimesprosecuted by district attorneys and city attorneys is notpossible. First, crimes often occur in different reportingyears than their subsequent prosecutions. Second, thenumber of crimes reported by law enforcement is higherthan those warranting prosecutorial action.Cases may be rejected by County District Attorneysand City Attorneys ofces for prosecution for various
reasons (e.g., insufcient evidence, witness not available,
defendant not available, etc.).
Hae Crme
Cae flng
27281.4%
Cae N
fled aHae Crme
6218.6%
Hae CrmeCae Pendng
Dpn
238.5%
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
12/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
WHEN DOES A CRIME BECOMEA HATE CRIME?
A crime becomes a hate crime when the criminal offenses
committed against persons, property, or society are moti-vated, in whole or part, by the offenders bias against race,religion, disability, sexual-orientation, gender, ethnicity/na-
tional origin, or association with a person or group withone or more of these actual or perceived characteristics.
Hate crimes are not separate distinct crimes but rathertraditional offenses motivated by the offenders bias.
This section of the 2006 Hate Crimereport will describe the details of these hate crime events, including information
on bias motivation, type of crime, location of the crime, and type of victim (Data characteristics and known limitationsare provided in Appendix 3).
8 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
WHAT IS A HATE CRIMEEVENT?
A hate crime event may include the occurrence of one or
more criminal offenses, committed against one or morevictims, by one or more suspects/perpetrators. Also,victims can have more than one offense committed
against them. In 2006 there were 1,306 total hate crimeevents, which included 1,702 offenses, 1,611 victims, and
1,612 known suspects (as shown in Table N-1 below).
Table N-1HATE CRIMES, 2006
Summary of Total Events, Offenses, Victims,
and Known Suspects
Total
Total events 1,306
Total offenses 1,702
Total victims 1,611
Total known suspects 1,612
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
13/59
CRI ME DATA
CRIME DATA 9
Anti-black
Anti-otherethnicity/nationalorigin*
Anti-Hispanic
Anti-white
Anti-multipleraces,group
Anti-American
Indian/AlaskanNative
51.2%
18.1%
11.1%
7.6%6.2% 5.3%
0.5%
Anti-Asian/PacificIslander
in 2006, 1,306 hate crime events were reported. Thesubtotals are as follows:
type Number Percenage
Race/ethnicity/ 844 64.6national origin
Sexual 246 18.8orientation
Religion 205 15.7
Gender 8 0.6
Disability 3 0.2
in 2006, 844 race/ethnicity/national origin hate crimeevents were reported. The subtotals are as follows:
type Number Percenage
Anti-black 432 51.2
Anti-Hispanic 153 18.1
Anti-other ethnicity/ 94 11.1
national origin*
Anti-white 64 7.6
Anti-Asian/Pacic Islander 52 6.2
Anti-multiple races, group 45 5.3
Anti-American Indian/ 4 0.5
Alaskan Native
Figure 3
HATE CRIME EVENTS, 2006Race/Ethnicity/National Origin
Source: Table 1.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Source: Table 1.
*Anti-other ethnicity/national origin includes Arab or Middle Easternbias motivated hate crimes.
seual renan hate crimes decreased 3.5 percent
from 255 in 2005 to 246 in 2006 while relgn hate crimesremained the same for both years.
Anti-Asian/Pacifc Islanderhate crimes increased 4.0 per-
cent from 50 in 2005 to 52 in 2006. An-Hpanc hate crimeevents increased 4.1 percent from 147 in 2005 to 153 in 2006.
An-whe and An-mulple race hate crimes decreased16.9 percent and 26.2 percent, respectively, from their 2005
values. In addition, An-black hate crimes decreased 11.8percent while An-her ehncy/nanal rg n hate
crimes increased 5.6 percent from their 2005 values.
64.6%
18.8%
Race/ethnicity/nationalorigin
Sexualorienta-
tion
Religion Gender Disability
15.7%
0.6% 0.2%
Figure 2HATE CRIME EVENTS, 2006
Bias Motivation
BiAs MotiVAtioN
RACE/EtHNiCitY/NAtioNAL oRiGiN
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
14/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
Intimi-dationAggra-vatedassault
Simpleassault Robbery
36.0%
29.7%30.4%
3.7%
Murder ForcibleRape
0.1% 0.1%
Destruction/vandalism
Burglary Arson Larceny-theft
93.2%
3.6% 1.8% 1.2% 0.2%
Motorvehicle
theft
10 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
in 2006, 1,702 hate crime offenses were reported. Thesubtotals are as follows:
type Number Percenage
Violent crimes 1,044 61.3
Property crimes 658 38.7
Figure 4HATE CRIME OFFENSES, 2006
Type of Crime
Figure 6HATE CRIME OFFENSES, 2006Property Crimein 2006, 658 property crime offenses were reported.
The subtotals are as follows:
type Number Percenage
Destruction/vandalism 613 93.2Burglary 24 3.6
Arson 12 1.8
Larceny-theft 8 1.2
Motor vehicle theft 1 0.2
Source: Table 2.
Source: Table 2.
Vlen crme ene decreased 4.7 percent from1,096 in 2005 to 1,044 in 2006. Prpery crme ene
increased 10.6 percent from 595 in 2005 to 658 in 2006.
Derucn/vandalm hate crimes increased 10.8 percent
from 553 in 2005 to 613 in 2006.
in 2006, 1,044 violent crime offenses were reported.
The subtotals are as follows:
type Number Percenage
Aggravated assault 376 36.0
Intimidation 317 30.4
Simple assault 310 29.7
Robbery 39 3.7
Murder 1 0.1
Forcible rape 1 0.1
Aggravaed aaul hate crimes increased 18.6 percentfrom 317 in 2005 to 376 in 2006. inmdan hate crimes
decreased 28.4% from 443 in 2005 to 317 in 2006.Finally,rbbery hate crimes increased 8.3 percent from 36 in 2005
to 39 in 2006.
Figure 5HATE CRIME OFFENSES, 2006Violent Crime
Source: Table 2.
PROPERTY
CRIMES
38.7% VIOLENTCRIMES
61.3%
tYPE of CRiME
VioLENt CRiME
PRoPERtY CRiME
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
15/59
CRI ME DATA
ResidenceHighway School Church/synagogue
Parkinglot
FieldRestaurant All otherlocations
26.8%
30.2%
10.4%
7.6%6.1%
2.8% 2.3%
13.7%
87.0%
5.1%
Individuals Governmentproperty
Religiousorganizations
Business/financial
institutions
5.0%2.9%
Other
0.1%
in 2006, 1,306 hate crime events were reported. Theyoccurred in the following locations:
Lcan Number Percenage
Highway/road/alley/street 395 30.2
Residence/home/driveway 350 26.8
School/college 136 10.4
Parking lot/garage 99 7.6
Church/synagogue/temple 80 6.1
Restaurant 37 2.8
Fields/woods/park 30 2.3
All other locations 179 13.7
Figure 7HATE CRIME EVENTS, 2006
Location
Source: Table 3.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Parkng l/garage hate crimes decreased 7.5 percent from107 in 2005 to 99 in 2006. Church/ynaggue/emple
hate crimes decreased 2.4 percent from 82 in 2005 to 80
in 2006. Reauran hate crime increased 19.4 percentfrom 31 in 2005 to 37 in 2006.
in 2006, there were 1,611 victims in all reported hate
crime events. Victims can be either individuals orinstitutions. The subtotals are as follows:
type vcm Number Percenage
Individuals 1,401 87.0
Religious organizations 82 5.1
Government property 80 5.0
Business/nancial 46 2.9institutions
Other 2 0.1
Business/fnancial institution hate crimes increased
35.3 percent from 34 in 2005 to 46 in 2006. Relgurganzan hate crimes increased 43.9 percent from 57
in 2005 to 82 in 2006. Hate crimes reported for ndvdu-al decreased 3.5 percent from 1,452 in 2005 to 1,401 in
2006 (See Appendix 3, Data Characteristics and Known
Limitations, Item #8).
Figure 8
HATE CRIME EVENTS, 2006Type of Victim
Source: Table 4.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
CRIME DATA 11
LoCAtioN
tYPE of ViCtiM
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
16/59
ProSECUTorIal
DaTa
Hate
Crime
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
17/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
HAtE CRiME CAsEsWitH A DisPositioN
249
14 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
HAtE CRiMECoNViCtioNs
140
fgure 9HAtE CRiME PRosECUtioN DisPositioNs, 2006
REPoRtED HAtE CRiMEs
1,306
Source: Tables 1, 7A, and 7B.Note: The number of hate crime lings with dispositions includes cases referred in 2006 and prior years.
HAtE CRiME CAsEs REfERRED to PRosECUtoRs
363
CRiMiNAL CAsE fiLiNGs334
otHERCoNViCtioNs
78
NotCoNViCtED
31
HAtE CRiME CAsE fiLiNGs
272
iNtERPREtiNG PRosECUtoRiAL DAtA
To show the criminal justice systems response to hate
crimes, in March 1995, the Attorney General requestedall district attorneys and city attorneys to submit summary
data of complaints led and convictions secured. The2006 District Attorneys and City Attorneys Report Fileof Hate Crime Cases contains summary data based on
cases referred to each district attorney or city attorney, andlings and convictions which occurred between January
1 through December 31, 2006.
There are many factors that must take place for a caseto be forwarded for possible prosecution in Californias
criminal justice system. In our continuing effort to bringclarity to the nature and value of prosecutorial data,this brief overview is provided.
At the request of district attorneys, collection procedures
were modied to ensure the collection of all juvenile,
as well as all adult, case data. The overview below
contains all juvenile and adult prosecution data submittedfor 2006.
In addition, the reader is advised that relating thenumber of hate crimes reported by law enforcement
agencies to the number of hate crimes prosecuted bydistrict attorneys and city attorneys is not possible. First,
crimes often occur in different reporting years than theirsubsequent prosecutions. Second, the number of crimes
reported by law enforcement is much higher than thosewarranting prosecutorial action.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
18/59
PROSECUTORI AL DATA
totAL CAsEs fiLEDfoR PRosECUtioN
in 2006, of 334 cases led by District Attorney and CityAttorney ofces for prosecution:
272 cases (81.4 percent) were led as hatecrimes.
62 cases (18.6 percent) were led as non-bias
motivated crimes.
Figure 11HATE CRIMES, 2006
Total Cases Filed for Prosecution
Source: Table 7A.
PROSECUTORIAL DATA 15
totAL CAsEs REfERRED
in 2006, of 363 cases that were referred by law
enforcement agencies for prosecution:
334 cases (92.0 percent) were filed for
prosecution. This was an increase compared to88.4 percent of 448 cases referred in 2005.
29 cases (8.0 percent) were rejected forprosecution for various reasons (e.g., insufcient
evidence, witness not available, defendant notavailable, etc.).
Figure 10
HATE CRIMES, 2006Total Cases Referred
Source: Table 7A.
CASES FILED
92.0%
CASESREJECTED
8.0%
NON-BIASMOTIVATED
CRIMESFILINGS
18.6%
HATE CRIMESFILINGS
81.4%
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
19/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
HAtE CRiME CoNViCtioNs
in 2006, of the 140 hate crime convictions:
102 convictions (72.9 percent) were either aplea of guilty or nolo contendere.
38 convictions (27.1 percent) were trialverdicts.
Figure 13HATE CRIMES, 2006
Hate Crime Convictions
Source: Table 7B.
16 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
totAL DisPositioNs
in 2006, of 249 cases with a disposition:
140 cases (56.2 percent) resulted in a hatecrime conviction.
78 cases (31.3 percent) resulted in otherconvictions.
31 cases (12.4 percent) resulted in no
conviction.
Figure 12
HATE CRIMES, 2006Total Dispositions
Source: Table 7B.Note: Percentages do not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
HATECRIME
CONVICTIONS
56.2%
OTHERCONVICTIONS
31.3%
NOTCONVICTED
12.4%
TRIALVERDICTS
27.1%
GUILTY PLEAOR NOLO
CONTENDERE
72.9%
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
20/59
TrEnD
DaTa
Hate
Crime
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
21/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
18 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
EVENts
In 2006, reported hate crime events decreased6.5 percent from the previous year, continuing adownward trend that began with a 26.6 percent
decrease in 2002 and a 10.1 percent decrease in2003. Hate crime events in 2001 increased 15.5
percent from their level in 2000 in response to thewave of post-9/11 hate crimes targeting individuals
or their property who were, or perceived to be, MiddleEastern or Muslims. From 1997 to 1999, hate crime
events uctuated declining 4.4 percent from 1997
1998 and increasing 12.1 percent in 1999. (See Table11 for hate crime events by bias-motivation.)
offENsEs
In 2006, reported hate crime offenses increasedslightly (0.7 percent) from the previous year. From
1997 to 2001, hate crime offenses fluctuated
declining 11.0 percent in 1998 and increasing 11.1percent in 1999. After increasing by 13.1 percentfrom 2000 to 2001, hate crime offenses decreased25.3 percent from 2001 to 2005.
ViCtiMs
In 2006, reported number of hate crime victimsdecreased 1.8 percent from the previous year,continuing a downward trend that began with a 28.6
percent decrease in 2002, and a 9.6 percent decreasein 2003. From 1997 to 1998, victims of hate crimesdeclined 6.3 percent. The next three years, 19992001, the number of victims varied year to year with a
14.0 percent increase in 1999, a 3.4 percent decreasein 2000, and a 19.6 percent increase in 2001.
KNoWN sUsPECts
In 2006, reported number of known suspectsincreased 1.4 percent from the previous year. Thisfollows the 6.3 percent increase in 2005. From 1997
to 2001, the number of known suspects uctuated
decreasing 10.0 percent from 1997-1998 and
increasing 1.8 percent in 1999, 4.3 percent in 2000,
and 17.7 percent in 2001.
The trends in hate crime events, offenses, victims, and known suspects were similar between 1997 and 2006. Thesehate crime statistics were fairly constant from 19972000. A dramatic increase occurred in 2001, after which time theyhave slowly decreased to their current 2006 values.
HAtE CRiME EVENts, offENsEs, ViCtiMs, AND KNoWN sUsPECts
19972006
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
22/59
TREND DATA
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2006200520042003200220012000199919981997
YEAR
NUMBER
VICTIMS
SUSPECTS
EVENTS
OFFENSES
0
TREND DATA 19
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Events ................... 1,831 1,750 1,962 1,957 2,261 1,659 1,491 1,409 1,397 1,306
Offenses ................ 2,023 1,801 2,001 2,002 2,265 2,009 1,815 1,770 1,691 1,702
Victims ................... 2,279 2,136 2,436 2,352 2,812 2,007 1,815 1,741 1,640 1,611
Known Suspects .... 2,206 1,985 2,021 2,107 2,479 1,963 1,629 1,495 1,589 1,612
Figure 14
HAtE CRiMEs, 19972006Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known Suspects
Table N-2
EVENts, offENsEs, ViCtiMs, AND KNoWN sUsPECts19972006
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
23/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
200620052004200320022001YEAR
NUMBER
RELIGION
SEXUALORIENTATION
RACE/ETHNICITY/NATIONAL ORIGIN
20 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
Source: Table 12.
Figure 15
BIA S MOTIVATIONReport ed Hat e Cr ime Offense Cate gor ies, 20012006
RACE/EtHNiCitY/NAtioNAL oRiGiN In 2006,
these types of hate crime offenses increased 0.7 per-cent, after decreasing 3.0 percent in 2005. A downwardtrend began in 2002 with a 16.8 percent decrease and
continued with a 9.6 percent decrease in 2003. Hatecrime offenses based on a victims race/ethnicity/national
origin have been the largest bias motivation category,totaling 60 percent or greater since the beginning of hate
crime reporting in California. Hate crime offenses basedon a victims race/ethnicity/national origin increased
20.8 percent in 2001 due in large part to post-9/11hate crime activity.
sExUAL oRiENtAtioN In 2006, these types ofhate crime offenses increased 3.6 percent. Hate crime
offenses based on a victims sexual orientation havebeen the second largest bias motivation category since
the inception of hate crime reporting in California. From1997 to 2006, hate crime offenses targeting a victimssexual orientation have been at least 18 percent of
the reported total. These types of hate crime offenses
decreased 7.4 percent in 2000, then increased in thetwo-year period 2001-2002 (by 1.9 percent and 5.9percent, respectively).
RELiGioN In 2006, these types of hate crime offenses
increased 0.4 percent after decreasing 9.6 percent in2005. Hate crime offenses based on a victims religion
have consistently been the third largest bias motivationcategory since hate crime reporting began in California.
From 2000 to 2003, this type of hate crime steadily de-creased: 9.7 percent in 2000; 3.3 percent in 2001; 8.8percent in 2002; and 10.0 percent in 2003.
GENDER and PHYsiCAL/MENtAL DisABiLitY hate
crime offenses are the remaining two categories of biasmotivation hate crimes. These two categories have
totaled less than 2 percent of the hate crimes reported,and thus were not included in the above graph.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
24/59
TREND DATA
0
200
400
600
800
200620052004200320022001YEAR
NUMBER
BLACK
WHITE
GAY MALES
JEWISH
OTHER RACE/ETHNIC GROUP
HISPANIC
Figure 16
BIA S MOTIVATIONSelec ted Report ed Hat e Cr ime Offenses, 20012006
TREND DATA 21
Source: Table 12.
ANti-BLACK offENsEsThese continue to be the
highest reported bias motivation category (24 total cat-egories) since data collection started in California. Anti-black hate offenses averaged 597 between 2001 and
2005, with a high value of 613 in 2004 and a low of 580in 2002. In 2006, 588 of these offenses were reported,
a decrease of 3.1 percent from their 2005 value.
ANti-HisPANiC offENsEs Anti-Hispanic offensesaveraged 187 between 2001 and 2005, with a high value
of 207 in 2001 and a low of 142 in 2003. In 2006, 218of these offenses were reported, an increase of 16.0percent from their 2005 value.
ANti-MALE HoMosExUAL (GAY) offENsEsAnti-
male homosexual (gay) offenses averaged 269 between2001 and 2005, with a high value of 345 in 2001 and
a low of 192 in 2005. In 2006, 206 of these offenseswere reported, an increase of 7.3 percent from their2005 value.
ANti-JEWisH offENsEs Anti-Jewish offenses av-
eraged 175 between 2001 and 2005, with a high value
of 194 in 2002 and a low of 157 in 2005. In 2006, 146 of
these offenses were reported, a decrease of 7.0 percentfrom their 2005 value.
ANti-otHER EtHNiCitY/NAtioNAL oRiGiNoffENsEs Prior to 2001, there were about 100 or
less of these offenses reported annually. In 2001, therewas a dramatic increase to 428 offenses which was
largely due to post-9/11 hate crimes directed at Arab/Middle Eastern individuals and their property. Since
2001 these offenses began to decrease. Anti-otherethnicity/national origin offenses averaged 218 between2001 and 2005, with a high value of 428 in 2001 and
a low of 103 in 2005. In 2006, 118 of these offenseswere reported, an increase of 14.6 percent from their
2005 value.
ANti-WHitE offENsEs With the exception of 2005,these offenses decreased since 2001. Anti-white of-fenses averaged 100 between 2001 and 2005, with a
high value of 128 in 2001 and a low of 69 in 2004. In2006, 82 of these offenses were reported, a decrease
of 10.9 percent from their 2005 value.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
25/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
22 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
Figure 17
TYPE OF CRIM EReport ed Hat e Cr ime Offenses, 20012006
totAL offENsEs Total offenses averaged 1,910
between 2001 and 2005, with a high value of 2,265 in2001 and a low of 1,691 in 2005. In 2006, 1,702 of-fenses were reported, an increase of 0.7 percent from
the 2005 value.
VioLENt CRiME offENsEs Total offensesaveraged 1,332 between 2001 and 2005, with a high
value of 1,662 in 2001 and a low of 1,096 in 2005. In2006, 1,044 offenses were reported, a decrease of 4.7
percent from the 2005 value.
PRoPERtY CRiME offENsEs Total offenses
averaged 578 between 2001 and 2005, with a high valueof 635 in 2004 and a low of 492 in 2002. In 2006, 658
offenses were reported, an increase of 10.6 percentfrom the 2005 value.
Source: Table 13.
Note: From 1995 to 2001, a hierarchy rule was used toidentify the most serious crime type. For these years, the
total number of offenses in a multiple offense hate crimeevent would still be recorded, but the crime type would be
given as the most serious crime type. For example, a hate
crime event that had two offenses a simple assault, and
an aggravated assault would be counted as two offenseswith the most serious offense as aggravated assault.
Starting in 2002, the Department of Justice began counting
each offense in each hate crime event, whether it hadone offense (a majority of the events) or multiple offenses
(a minority of the events). This was undertaken to moreaccurately count each type of criminal offense (e.g.,
intimidation, simple assault, vandalism, etc.). Using thisnew standard of count, comparisons and trend analysis
should be limited to 2002 and forward. (See Appendix 3,
Data Characteristics and Known Limitations, on page52 for a further explanation of the hierarchy rule.)
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
200620052004200320022001YEAR
NUMBER
TOTAL OFFENSES
PROPERTY OFFENSES
VIOLENT OFFENSES
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
26/59
TREND DATA
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
200620052004200320022001YEAR
NUMBER
INTIMIDATION
ROBBERYMURDER
SIMPLE ASSAULT
AGGRAVATED ASSAULT
TREND DATA23
iNtiMiDAtioN offENsEs (involving threats of
violence) These offenses continue to be one of thelargest category of violent hate crimes since 2001.The dramatic increase in 2001 to 822 offenses, a 47.8
percent increase from the previous year, was due inlarge measure to post-9/11 hate crimes directed at
Arab/Middle Easterners. Since 2001 there has beena steady decline in the number of intimidation offenses.
Total offenses averaged 590 between 2001 and 2005,with a high value of 822 in 2001 and a low of 443 in
2005. In 2006, 317 offenses were reported, a decreaseof 28.4 percent from the previous year.
AGGRAVAtED AssAULt offENsEs Total offensesaveraged 253 between 2001 and 2005, with a high value
of 317 in 2005 and a low of 179 in 2003. In 2006, 376offenses were reported, an increase of 18.6 percent
from the 2005 value.
siMPLE AssAULt offENsEs As was noted forintimidation offenses, simple assault offenses showeda dramatic increase in 2001 to 524 offenses, a 40.1
percent increase from the previous year. In addition,simple assault offenses have been decreasing since2001. Total offenses averaged 427 between 2001 and
2005, with a high value of 524 in 2001 and a low of 298 in2005. In 2006, 310 offenses were reported, an increase
of 4.0 percent from the previous year.
Source: Table 13.
RoBBERY offENsEs Total offenses averaged 59
between 2001 and 2005, with a high value of 75 in 2002and a low of 36 in 2005. In 2006, 39 offenses werereported, an increase of 8.3 percent from the previous
year.
MURDER offENsEs Total offenses averaged twobetween 2001 and 2005, with a high value of four in
2002 and 2003 and a low of zero in 2004. In 2006, therewas one reported offense compared to one offense inthe previous year.
Figure 18
VIOLENT CRIMESelec ted Report ed Hat e Cr ime Offenses, 20012006
Note: From 1995 to 2001, a hierarchy rule was used toidentify the most serious crime type. For these years, the
total number of offenses in a multiple offense hate crime
event would still be recorded, but the crime type would begiven as the most serious crime type. For example, a hate
crime event that had two offenses a simple assault, andan aggravated assault would be counted as two offenses
with the most serious offense as aggravated assault.
Starting in 2002, the Department of Justice began count-
ingeachoffense ineachhate crime event, whether it hadone offense (a majority of the events) or multiple offenses
(a minority of the events). This was undertaken to moreaccurately count each type of criminal offense (e.g., intimi-
dation, simple assault, vandalism, etc.). Using this new
standard of count, comparisons and trend analysis shouldbe limited to 2002 and forward. (See Appendix 3, Data
Characteristics and Known Limitations, on page 52 fora further explanation of the hierarchy rule.)
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
27/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
Figure 19
PROPERTY CRIMESelec ted Report ed Hat e Cr ime Offenses, 20012006
24 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
DEstRUCtioN/VANDALisM offENsEs These
offenses have consistently been the highest categoryof property crime offenses since 2001. Total offensesaveraged 535 between 2001 and 2005, with a high value
of 593 in 2004 and a low of 451 in 2002. In 2006, 613offenses were reported, an increase of 10.8 percent
from the previous year.
BURGLARY offENsEs Total offenses averaged30 between 2001 and 2005, with a high value of 38 in
2001 and a low of 25 in 2003. In 2006, 24 offenses werereported, an 11.1 percent decrease from the previousyear.
ARsoN offENsEs Total offenses averaged 7 be-
tween 2001 and 2005, with a high value of 11 in 2004and a low of 4 in 2002. In 2006, 12 offenses were
reported, an increase from the 7 offenses reported theprevious year.
Source: Table 13.
0
200
400
600
800
200620052004200320022001YEAR
NUMBER
DESTRUCTION/VANDALISM
BURGLARYARSON
Note: From 1995 to 2001, a hierarchy rule was used to
identify the most serious crime type. For these years, the
total number of offenses in a multiple offense hate crimeevent would still be recorded, but the crime type would be
given as the most serious crime type. For example, a hatecrime event that had two offenses a simple assault, and
an aggravated assault would be counted as two offenseswith the most serious offense as aggravated assault.
Starting in 2002, the Department of Justice began count-ingeachoffense ineachhate crime event, whether it had
one offense (a majority of the events) or multiple offenses(a minority of the events). This was undertaken to more
accurately count each type of criminal offense (e.g., intimi-
dation, simple assault, vandalism, etc.). Using this newstandard of count, comparisons and trend analysis should
be limited to 2002 and forward. (See Appendix 3, DataCharacteristics and Known Limitations, on page 52 for
a further explanation of the hierarchy rule.)
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
28/59
TREND DATA
0
200
400
600
800
200620052004200320022001YEAR
NUMBER
FIELD
SCHOOL
PARKING LOT
CHURCH
RESIDENCE
HIGHWAY
Figure 20
LOCATI ON OF CRIMESelec ted Report ed Hat e Cr ime Offenses, 20012006
TREND DATA25
REsiDENCE/HoME/DRiVEWAY This location
continues to be the largest category of hate crimeoffenses since 2001, the only exceptions being 2002and 2006, when the number of hate crime offenses was
larger for the category of highway/road/alley/street. Totaloffenses averaged 585 between 2001 and 2005, with
a high value of 711 in 2001 and a low of 511 in 2005.In 2006, 504 offenses were reported, a decrease of 1.4
percent from the previous year.
HiGHWAY/RoAD/ALLEY/stREEt This locationcontinues to be the second largest category of hate crimeoffenses since 2001, the only exceptions being 2002 and
2006 when this category exceeded the number of hatecrimes at the location of residence/home/driveway. Total
offenses averaged 558 between 2001 and 2005, with ahigh value of 654 in 2002 and a low of 456 in 2005. In
2006, 545 offenses were reported, an increase of 19.5percent from the previous year.
sCHooL/CoLLEGE Total offenses averaged 169
between 2001 and 2005, with a high value of 189 in
2001 and a low of 150 in 2003. In 2006, 152 offenseswere reported, a decrease of 13.6 percent from theprevious year.
PARKiNG Lot/GARAGE Total offenses averaged
108 between 2001 and 2005, with a high value of 138in 2005 and a low of 79 in 2002. In 2006, 135 offenses
were reported, a decrease of 2.2 percent from the pre-vious year.
CHURCH/sYNAGoGUE/tEMPLE Total offensesaveraged 78 between 2001 and 2005, with a high
value of 92 in 2001 and a low of 66 in 2003. In 2006,84 offenses were reported, the same as in the previous
year.
fiELD/WooDs/PARK Total offenses averaged 39between 2001 and 2005, with a high value of 51 in 2003and a low of 31 in 2004. In 2006, 38 offenses were
reported, the same as in the previous year.
Source: Table 14.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
29/59
DaTa
T aB l E S
Hate
Crime
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
30/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
28 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
.
.
.
.
.
.
Table 1HATE CRIMES, 2006
Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known Suspects by Bias Motivation
Bias motivationEvents Offenses Victims Known suspects
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total........................................................ 1,306 100.0 1,702 100.0 1,611 100.0 1,612 100.0
Race/ethnicity/national origin 844 64.6 1,145 67.3 1,074 66.7 1,126 69.9
Anti-white........................................... 64 4.9 82 4.8 76 4.7 110 6.8
Anti-black........................................... 432 33.1 588 34.5 552 34.3 543 33.7
Anti-Hispanic......................... 153 11.7 218 12.8 203 12.6 281 17.4
Anti-American Indian/
Alaskan native................................. 4 0.3 5 0.3 4 0.2 4 0.2
Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander................. 52 4.0 74 4.3 72 4.5 58 3.6
Anti-multiple races, group..... 45 3.4 60 3.5 54 3.4 34 2.1
Anti-other ethnicity/
national origin 94 7.2 118 6.9 113 7.0 96 6.0
Religion................................... 205 15.7 227 13.3 223 13.8 117 7.3
Anti-Jewish........................................ 129 9.9 146 8.6 145 9.0 72 4.5Anti-Catholic...................................... 11 0.8 11 0.6 11 0.7 2 0.1
Anti-Protestant................................... 13 1.0 13 0.8 13 0.8 8 0.5
Anti-Islamic (Muslim)............. 14 1.1 14 0.8 14 0.9 13 0.8
Anti-other religion.............................. 23 1.8 28 1.6 25 1.6 15 0.9
Anti-multiple religious, group. 14 1.1 14 0.8 14 0.9 7 0.4
Anti-atheism/agnosticism/etc............. 1 0.1 1 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.0
Sexual orientation.................. 246 18.8 317 18.6 301 18.7 354 22.0
Anti-male homosexual (gay). 163 12.5 206 12.1 195 12.1 249 15.4
Anti-female homosexual..... 23 1.8 29 1.7 29 1.8 25 1.6
Anti-homosexual............................ 57 4.4 79 4.6 74 4.6 79 4.9
Anti-heterosexual.. 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-bisexual..................................... 3 0.2 3 0.2 3 0.2 1 0.1
Physical/mental disability...... 3 0.2 4 0.2 4 0.2 4 0.2
Anti-physical disability.......... 1 0.1 1 0.1 1 0.1 1 0.1
Anti-mental disability............. 2 0.2 3 0.2 3 0.2 3 0.2
Gender 8 0.6 9 0.5 9 0.6 11 0.7
Anti-male 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-female 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-transgender 8 0.6 9 0.5 9 0.6 11 0.7
Notes: Percentages may not add to subtotals or 100.0 because of rounding.
An event indicates the occurrence of one or more criminal offenses committed against one or more victims by one or more suspects/perpetrators.
A victim can have more than one offense committed against them.
The term 'known suspect' does not imply that the identity of the suspect is known.
For a more complete definition of each criminal justice term, please refer to the glossary (Appendix 5).
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
31/59
DATA TABLES
DATA TABLES 29
Table 2HATE CRIMES, 2006
Offenses by Type of Crime
Type of crimeOffenses
Number Percent
Total 1,702 100.0
Total Violent crimes 1,044 61.3
Murder 1 0.1
Forcible rape 1 0.1
Robbery 39 2.3
Aggravated assault 376 22.1
Simple assault 310 18.2
Intimidation 317 18.6
Total Property crimes 658 38.7
Burglary 24 1.4
Larceny-theft 8 0.5
Motor vehicle theft 1 0.1
Arson 12 0.7Destruction/vandalism 613 36.0
Notes: One suspect can commit more than one crime.
Percentages may not add to subtotals or 100.0 because of rounding.
One victim can have more than one offense committed against him/her.
An event indicates the occurrence of one or more offenses.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
32/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
30 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
Table 3HATE CRIMES, 2006
Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known Suspects by Location
LocationEvents Offenses Victims Known suspects
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total 1,306.......................................... 100.0 1,702 100.0 1,611 100.0 1,612 100.0
Air/bus/train terminal............ 6 0.5 6 0.4 6 0.4 11 0.7
Bank/savings and loan................... 2 0.2 2 0.1 2 0.1 2 0.1
Bar/night club....................... 15 1.1 21 1.2 21 1.3 28 1.7
Church/synagogue/temple.... 80 6.1 84 4.9 82 5.1 29 1.8
Commercial/office building.... 27 2.1 30 1.8 30 1.9 16 1.0
Construction site.................. 3 0.2 3 0.2 3 0.2 1 0.1
Convenience store............... 10 0.8 12 0.7 11 0.7 22 1.4
Department/discount store... 3 0.2 4 0.2 4 0.2 2 0.1
Drug store/Dr.'s office/hospital 5 0.4 5 0.3 5 0.3 2 0.1
Field/woods/park.................. 30 2.3 38 2.2 36 2.2 58 3.6
Government/public building............ 24 1.8 25 1.5 25 1.6 22 1.4
Grocery/supermarket........... 11 0.8 11 0.6 11 0.7 10 0.6
Highway/road/alley/street..... 395 30.2 545 32.0 520 32.3 692 42.9Hotel/motel/etc..................... 9 0.7 9 0.5 9 0.6 14 0.9
Jail/prison............................. 8 0.6 10 0.6 9 0.6 12 0.7
Lake/waterway/beach.......... 6 0.5 9 0.5 9 0.6 7 0.4
Liquor store.................................... 4 0.3 5 0.3 5 0.3 8 0.5
Parking lot/garage................ 99 7.6 135 7.9 122 7.6 146 9.1
Rental storage facility........... 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Residence/home/driveway... 350 26.8 504 29.6 465 28.9 327 20.3
Restaurant........................... 37 2.8 40 2.4 39 2.4 44 2.7
School/college..................... 136 10.4 152 8.9 147 9.1 125 7.8
Service/gas station.............. 7 0.5 7 0.4 7 0.4 7 0.4
Specialty store (TV, fur, etc.) 11 0.8 12 0.7 12 0.7 9 0.6
Other/unknown...................... 28 2.1 33 1.9 31 1.9 18 1.1
Notes: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
An event indicates the occurrence of one or more criminal offenses committed against one or more victims by one or more suspects/perpetrators.A victim can have more than one offense committed against them.
The term 'known suspect' does not imply that the identity of the suspect is known.
For a more complete definition of each criminal justice term, please refer to the glossary (Appendix 5).
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
33/59
DATA TABLES
DATA TABLES 31
.
.
.
Table 4HATE CRIMES, 2006
Victim Type by Bias Motivation
Bias motivationTotal1 Individual
Business/
financial
institution2
Government2Religious
organization2 Other
2
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total....................................... 1,611 100.0 1,401 100.0 46 100.0 80 100.0 82 100.0 2 100.0
Race/ethnicity/national origin 1,074 66.7 966 69.0 33 71.7 67 83.8 8 9.8 0 0.0
Anti-white......................... 76 4.7 73 5.2 1 2.2 2 2.5 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-black........................ 552 34.3 498 35.5 12 26.1 39 48.8 3 3.7 0 0.0
Anti-Hispanic............................. 203 12.6 191 13.6 7 15.2 5 6.3 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-American Indian/
Alaskan native................ 4 0.2 4 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander 72 4.5 66 4.7 4 8.7 1 1.3 1 1.2 0 0.0
Anti-multiple races, group.. 54 3.4 33 2.4 4 8.7 17 21.3 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-other ethnicity/
national origin.... 113 7.0 101 7.2 5 10.9 3 3.8 4 4.9 0 0.0
Religion............................... 223 13.8 125 8.9 11 23.9 13 16.3 73 89.0 1 50.0
Anti-Jewish................................ 145 9.0 102 7.3 7 15.2 12 15.0 23 28.0 1 50.0Anti-Catholic.............................. 11 0.7 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 9 11.0 0 0.0
Anti-Protestant........................... 13 0.8 3 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 10 12.2 0 0.0
Anti-Islamic (Muslim)...... 14 0.9 9 0.6 2 4.3 0 0.0 3 3.7 0 0.0
Anti-other religion............. 25 1.6 8 0.6 2 4.3 0 0.0 15 18.3 0 0.0
Anti-multiple religious, group. 14 0.9 1 0.1 0 0.0 1 1.3 12 14.6 0 0.0
Anti-atheism/agnosticism/etc 1 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.2 0 0.0
Sexual orientation............. 301 18.7 297 21.2 2 4.3 0 0.0 1 1.2 1 50.0
Anti-male homosexual (gay). 195 12.1 195 13.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-female homosexual... 29 1.8 29 2.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-homosexual................ 74 4.6 70 5.0 2 4.3 0 0.0 1 1.2 1 50.0
Anti-heterosexual.......... 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-bisexual................. 3 0.2 3 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Physical/mental disability.... 4 0.2 4 0.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0Anti-physical disability....... 1 0.1 1 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-mental disability........... 3 0.2 3 0.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Gender 9 0.6 9 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-male.......... 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-female........... 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Anti-transgender......... 9 0.6 9 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Note: Percentages may not add to subtotals or 100.0 because of rounding.1Numbers represent total number of victims (i.e., entities and individuals), not the number of hate crime events.
Numbers represent acts directed at entities other than individuals.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
34/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
32 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
.
.
Table 5HATE CRIMES, 2006
Victim Type by Location
LocationTotal
1 Individual
Business/
financial
institution2
Government2 Religious
organization2 Other
2
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Total.................................... 1,611 100.0 1,401 100.0 46 100.0 80 100.0 82 100.0 2 100.0
Air/bus/train terminal......... 6 0.4 6 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Bank/savings and loan............... 2 0.1 2 0.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Bar/night club.................... 21 1.3 21 1.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Church/synagogue/temple 82 5.1 13 0.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 69 84.1 0 0.0
Commercial/office building 30 1.9 19 1.4 11 23.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Construction site............... 3 0.2 2 0.1 1 2.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Convenience store............ 11 0.7 9 0.6 2 4.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Department/discount store 4 0.2 2 0.1 2 4.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Drug store/Dr.'s office/hospital 5 0.3 4 0.3 1 2.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Field/woods/park........................ 36 2.2 33 2.4 0 0.0 3 3.8 0 0.0 0 0.0
Government/public building 25 1.6 8 0.6 0 0.0 17 21.3 0 0.0 0 0.0
Grocery/supermarket.................. 11 0.7 8 0.6 3 6.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0Highway/road/alley/street.. 520 32.3 505 36.0 4 8.7 11 13.8 0 0.0 0 0.0
Hotel/motel/etc.................. 9 0.6 9 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Jail/prison.......................... 9 0.6 9 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Lake/waterway/beach....... 9 0.6 9 0.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Liquor store....................... 5 0.3 5 0.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Parking lot/garage............. 122 7.6 121 8.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 1.2 0 0.0
Rental storage facility........ 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Residence/home/driveway 465 28.9 459 32.8 5 10.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 50.0
Restaurant........................ 39 2.4 33 2.4 6 13.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
School/college.................. 147 9.1 82 5.9 6 13.0 48 60.0 10 12.2 1 50.0
Service/gas station........... 7 0.4 7 0.5 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Specialty store (TV, fur, etc.) 12 0.7 11 0.8 1 2.2 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Other/unknown................... 31 1.9 24 1.7 4 8.7 1 1.3 2 2.4 0 0.0
Note: Percentages may not add to 100.0 because of rounding.
Numbers represent total number of victims (i.e., entities and individuals), not the number of hate crime events.Numbers represent acts directed at entities other than individuals.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
35/59
DATA TABLES
DATA TABLES 33
1,306 1,702 1,611 1,612
33 53 52 281 1 1 0
1 1 1 3
10 21 21 9
1 1 1 1
4 4 4 3
3 5 5 3
2 4 3 1
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 4
4 5 5 1
2 2 2 0
1 1 1 0
2 6 6 3
0 0 0 0
1 2 1 2
1 2 1 2
2 2 2 1
2 2 2 1
0 0 0 0
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
20 31 26 17
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 0
7 8 8 6
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 1
3 4 4 6
1 10 5 2
3 3 3 2
0 0 0 0
2 6 3 3
1 4 2 0
1 2 1 3
12 17 17 20
3 4 4 3
7 11 11 15
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0
2 4 3 2
2 4 3 2
3 3 3 6
1 1 1 1
2 2 2 5
1 3 1 0
1 3 1 0
21 38 27 37
10 21 14 25
8 12 10 9
3 5 3 3
Bishop
Inyo County....
(continued)
Ridgecrest..
Kern County.
Newark..
Del Norte County.
El Dorado County....
Fresno County.
Colusa County...
Contra Costa County.
Sheriff's Dept.
Antioch
Brentwood.
Concord
El Cerrito
Pittsburg.
Pleasant Hill.
Sheriff's Dept.
Fresno.......
State Center Community.
Imperial County....
Humboldt County..
Arcata
Sheriff's Dept.
Williams.
Calaveras County.
Bakersfield.................
Richmond
San Pablo..
Walnut Creek..
CSU Fresno
Glenn County....
Clovis..
San Leandro....
CSU East Bay..
UC Berkeley....
Sheriff's Dept....
Alpine County.....
Table 6
Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known Suspects by County and Jurisdiction
HATE CRIMES, 2006
Alameda County
Total
Known
suspects
Alameda
Albany.........
Berkeley
Calexico..
Butte County
Chico...
Fremont......
Oakland
Livermore
Pleasanton.............
County and
jurisdiction*Events Offenses Victims
Union City
E. Bay Reg. Park District.
Sheriff's Dept.
South Lake Tahoe
Amador County...............
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
36/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
34 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
0 0 0 0
8 9 9 128 9 9 12
0 0 0 0
450 542 535 644
121 140 139 157
46 49 49 54
3 4 3 3
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 2
3 3 3 2
3 3 3 2
1 2 2 3
2 2 2 1
2 4 4 2
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 6
3 4 4 2
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 2
3 3 3 6
8 11 11 10
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 1
5 7 7 7
8 9 9 22
1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0
8 12 12 10
1 1 1 3
4 5 5 7
1 1 1 0
2 3 3 3
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 0
4 9 9 3
3 3 3 1
8 9 9 5
2 2 2 2
5 6 6 8
2 2 2 1
1 1 1 1
16 18 18 10
3 3 3 2
3 3 3 0
25 32 30 38
211 252 250 338
4 7 7 11 1 1 0
1 1 1 1
14 22 20 53
6 10 10 10
(continued)
La Mirada3.....
La Puente3.
Lakewood3...
Compton3.....
Duarte3.....
La Habra Heights3
Cudahy3.....
Diamond Bar3.....
Los Angeles..
Lawndale3....
Mailbu3.....
Pico Rivera3....
Paramount3....
Santa Clarita3.........
Glendora
Gardena
El Segundo
Bell..
West Hollywood3.
Temple City3....
Glendale
Covina
Burbank
HATE CRIMES, 2006
Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known Suspects by County and Jurisdiction
Sheriff's Dept.
Kings County.....
Sheriff's Dept1
Unincorporated2......
Table 6 - continued
Lake County...
Lassen County
Los Angeles County.
Bellflower3...
Agoura Hills3....
Carson3....
Calabasas3..........
Cerritos3......
Artesia3....
Avalon3......
Rosemead3....
Hawaiian Gardens3
Beverly Hills
Baldwin Park
Westlake Village3.
Azusa
San Dimas3.............
Lancaster3....
Norwalk3...
County and
jurisdiction*Events Offenses Victims
Known
suspects
Palmdale3.........
Claremont
Pomona..
El Monte..
Monterey Park.
La Verne...
Long Beach.
Manhattan Beach..Maywood
Pasadena..
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
37/59
DATA TABLES
DATA TABLES 35
1 1 1 2
2 2 2 3
2 2 2 14 4 4 0
5 5 5 2
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
0 0 0 0
8 8 8 2
1 1 1 0
2 2 2 0
5 5 5 2
4 5 5 5
4 5 5 5
5 6 6 9
2 2 2 4
3 4 4 5
3 3 3 1
2 2 2 1
1 1 1 0
0 0 0 0
1 4 2 2
1 4 2 2
3 10 10 5
2 9 9 5
1 1 1 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
78 104 96 95
1 2 1 1
6 8 8 9
3 3 3 3
3 3 3 7
8 9 9 0
4 4 4 6
9 10 10 13
11 12 11 12
5 17 17 10
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 3
1 2 1 1
1 2 1 1
2 2 2 3
2 3 2 2
2 2 2 1
5 6 6 9
2 2 2 0
2 3 2 4
1 2 1 4
3 4 4 1
4 5 4 5
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 0
0 0 0 0
HATE CRIMES, 2006
Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known Suspects by County and Jurisdiction
Novato.....
San Rafael..
County and
jurisdiction*
CSU Dominguez Hills...
UC Los Angeles...
Brea
Sheriff's Dept..
Merced County....
CSU Monterey Bay
Sheriff's Dept....
Modoc County...
Napa County...
Aliso Viejo4.
Anaheim..
Marina
Mono County....
Monterey County...
Mammoth Lakes....
Marin County.....
West Covina....
CSU Northridge...
Events Offenses VictimsKnown
suspects
Table 6 - continued
Nevada County...
Roseville..
Plumas County....
Orange County
Costa Mesa...
CSU Fullerton
Fountain Valley.
Fullerton...
Garden Grove.
Los Alimitos
Mission Viejo4
Newport Beach
Rancho Santa Margarita4
Huntington Beach.
Laguna Beach.
Laguna Hills4
Irvine.
Laguna Niguel4
Lake Forest4
Santa Ana
Placentia
Orange
San Clemente4
Westminster
(continued)
Placer County..
Santa Monica...
Redondo Beach.....
San Gabriel.....
Atwater....
Fort Bragg
Madera County.....
Sheriff's Dept...
Mendocino County....
Sheriff's Dept..
Mariposa County....
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
38/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
36 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
102 149 141 98
18 29 27 17
1 1 1 61 2 2 0
7 9 9 5
12 16 14 9
3 7 5 2
1 5 5 0
3 7 7 2
1 1 1 1
4 5 4 1
12 16 16 17
5 6 5 5
3 5 5 1
26 35 35 30
5 5 5 2
60 74 68 64
16 18 17 12
2 2 2 3
4 4 4 41 1 1 2
37 49 44 43
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
21 29 27 18
1 1 1 1
8 11 11 4
1 1 1 3
1 1 1 1
1 4 2 1
1 1 1 0
2 2 2 2
2 4 4 5
2 2 2 0
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0
129 181 161 165
31 52 41 34
3 4 4 2
1 1 1 6
3 4 4 5
3 3 3 3
8 19 11 14
1 2 1 3
2 2 2 6
2 3 3 3
2 2 2 3
3 3 3 6
1 1 1 0
8 8 8 12
55 69 69 64
1 3 3 1
3 3 3 3
2 2 2 0
106 125 122 135
100 119 116 134
6 6 6 1
10 11 11 9
2 3 3 3
3 3 3 3
5 5 5 3
(continued)
El Cajon
Yucaipa6
Escondido
Riverside County....
Table 6 - continuedHATE CRIMES, 2006
Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known Suspects by County and Jurisdiction
Known
suspects
Sheriff's Dept..
Corona..
City of Canyon Lake5
Colton.
Big Bear6
Calimesa
5
Hemet
La Quinta5.
Moreno Valley5.
Lake Elsinore5.
Norco5.
Palm Dessert5
Palm Springs..
Perris5...
Riverside
Temecula5
Rancho Mirage5..
Sacramento County...........
Sheriff's Dept.
CSU Sacramento
Folsom....Galt...
Sacramento..
San Benito County..
San Bernardino County
Hollister..
Chino.
Chino Hills6
Fontana ............................
Ontario
Montclair....
Stockton.
Rialto.
San Bernardino......
Sheriff's Dept....
San Diego..
San Diego Harbor..
San Joaquin County
CSU San Francisco
Upland..
Encinitas7
Santee7..
Poway7
San Marcos7
La Mesa
National City
Manteca
Lodi
San Diego County...
County and
jurisdiction*Events Offenses Victims
Chula Vista
Lemon Grove7
San Francisco
San Francisco County
Oceanside..
San Diego Coast DPR
CSU San Marcos
Vista7.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
39/59
DATA TABLES
DATA TABLES 37
7 7 7 5
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 1
2 2 2 1
3 3 3 3
25 28 28 24
1 2 2 0
1 3 3 0
1 1 1 0
2 2 2 1
1 1 1 3
2 2 2 4
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 1
14 14 14 14
1 1 1 1
4 4 4 7
3 3 3 7
1 1 1 0
38 48 48 54
1 1 1 1
1 2 2 1
1 1 1 2
1 2 2 2
3 3 3 2
30 38 38 43
1 1 1 3
25 38 31 34
6 8 8 9
14 25 18 20
4 4 4 5
1 1 1 0
13 18 17 18
4 4 4 4
9 14 13 14
0 0 0 0
1 4 4 4
1 4 4 4
13 18 18 5
1 2 2 0
4 4 4 1
1 1 1 1
7 11 11 3
19 29 29 15
6 11 11 5
1 1 1 0
2 2 2 1
2 3 3 2
6 10 10 5
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
16 17 17 92 3 3 1
10 10 10 6
1 1 1 0
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0
5 6 5 4
3 4 3 0
2 2 2 4
2 2 2 1
2 2 2 1
(continued)
HATE CRIMES, 2006Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known Suspects by County and Jurisdiction
Atascadero
Pismo Beach
San Luis Obispo.
San Mateo County.
Burlingame
Menlo Park
Sutter County...
Modesto..
Yuba City..
Tehama County..
San Bruno
Table 6 - continued
Sheriff's Dept.
San Luis Obispo County
San Mateo
Sheriff's Dept..
South San Francisco
Santa Barbara County.
Santa Barbara
Palo Alto
San Jose
UC Santa Barbara
Santa Clara County.
Morgan Hill
Los Gatos
Petaluma
CSU Stanislaus
Mountain View
Santa Cruz.
Watsonville....
Santa Cruz County.
Santa Clara....
UC Santa Cruz....
Fairfield..
Vacaville..
Sonoma County.
Shasta County..
Sheriff's Dept
Redding..
Sierra County..
Siskiyou County...
Solano County....
Sheriff's Dept..
Sheriff's Dept.
Cotati
Suisun..
Rohnert Park..
Santa Rosa.
CSU Sonoma
Stanislaus County.......
Sonoma.
Sheriff's Dept...
Patterson
Turlock.
Riverbank
Known
suspects
County and
jurisdiction*Events Offenses Victims
Belmont
Daly City
Half Moon Bay
Sheriff's Dept..
Red Bluff..
Pacifica
Redwood City
Milpitas
Weed..
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
40/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
38 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
0 0 0 0
6 7 7 4
1 1 1 1
5 6 6 3
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1
24 32 31 26
1 1 1 0
8 9 9 6
1 1 1 1
1 1 1 0
3 4 3 2
5 5 5 5
5 11 11 12
12 13 13 12
5 6 6 10
7 7 7 2
6 7 6 6
5 6 5 6
1 1 1 0
1Includes unincorporated and contracts.
2"Unincorporated" patrolled by Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
3Contracts with Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department.
4Contracts with Orange County Sheriff's Department.
5Contracts with Riverside County Sheriff's Department.
6Contracts with San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department.
7Contracts with San Diego County Sheriff's Department.
9Contracts with Ventura County Sheriff's Department.
*Only those jurisdictions which reported a hate crime are listed in this table.
Table 6 - continuedHATE CRIMES, 2006
Events, Offenses, Victims, and Known Suspects by County and Jurisdiction
Trinity County..
8Contracts with Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department.
Tuolumne County........
Sonora..
Ventura County....
Sheriff's Dept..
Wheatland
Yolo County..
Davis....
Woodland..
Yuba County.
Sheriff's Dept..
Simi Valley.
Ventura...
Camarillo9........
Moorpark9........
Santa Paula...
Known
suspects
County and
jurisdiction*Events Offenses Victims
Ojai9.................
Tulare County..
Tulare.
Visalia..........
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
41/59
DATA TABLES
DATA TABLES 39
Table 7A
SUMMARY OF CASES REFERRED
BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND TYPE OF FILINGS
For the Period January 1 Through December 31, 2006
Agency Total hate crimecases referred
Total cases filedas hate crimes
Total cases filed as
non-bias motivated
crimes
Total................................ 363 272 62
County District Attorneys 337 262 58
City Attorneys 26 10 4
Note: Please see Data Table 8 for details.
Table 7B
SUMMARY OF HATE CRIME CASE DISPOSITIONSFor the Period January 1 Through December 31, 2006
AgencyTotal
dispositions
Not
convicted
Convictions
Total
convictions
Hate crime convictionsAll other
convictionsTotalGuilty plea/nolo
contendere
Trial
verdict
Total............................................. 249 31 218 140 102 38 78
County District Attorneys 245. 31 214 136 98 38 78
City Attorneys. 4 0 4 4 4 0 0
Note: Please see Data Table 9 for details.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
42/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
40 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
Table 8CASES REFERRED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
AND TYPE OF FILINGS
AS REPORTED BY
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS AND CITY ATTORNEYS
For the Period January 1 Through December 31, 2006
363 272 62
337 262 58
4 4 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 4 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 6 0
4 3 10 0 0
2 2 0
0 0 0
4 2 2
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 6 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
145 106 23
1 1 0
3 0 10 0 0
10 6 4
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 1 0
1 1 0
0 0 0
2 0 2
16 14 0
0 0 0
0 1 1
10 8 2
6 3 00 0 0San Benito................................
Placer...........................
Plumas........................
Riverside.....................
Sacramento.............
Monterey......................
Napa.....................................
Nevada.....................................
Orange.....................................
Mendocino............................
Merced..................................
Modoc..........................
Mono............................
Los Angeles3,4..............
Madera...................
Marin.....................................Mariposa....................
Kern1,2,4............................
Kings.....................................
Lake......................................
Lassen.....................
Inyo..............................
Butte.............................................
Colusa.................
Contra Costa.........................
Del Norte...............................El Dorado..............................
Fresno......................................
Glenn....................................
Humboldt......................
Alpine.......................................
Alameda1,2,4..................................
Amador........................................
Imperial........................
(continued)
AgencyTotal hate crime
cases referred
Total cases filed
as hate crimes
Total cases filed as
non-bias motivated
crimes
County District Attorneys
Calaveras..........
Total..............................................
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
43/59
DATA TABLES
DATA TABLES 41
Table 8 - continuedCASES REFERRED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
AND TYPE OF FILINGS
AS REPORTED BY
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS AND CITY ATTORNEYS
For the Period January 1 Through December 31, 2006
6 6 0
13 9 1
26 9 7
2 2 0
7 6 1
8 7 0
2 0 1
19 11 7
6 3 1
5 13 2
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 1 0
6 5 0
2 2 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 2 0
1 0 0
12 11 1
3 2 1
7 5 0
26 10 4
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
2 2 0
12 4 2
0 0 0
12 4 2
0 0 0
Notes: Zero indicates that no case information was reported in this reporting category.
The number of complaints filed by county district attorneys and city attorneys or the number of cases
that resulted in hate crime convictions cannot be linked to the number of hate crimes reported by law
enforcement agencies.1Does not track hate crime cases referred to their offices.2Tracks only total number of hate crimes filed by their office.3Does not track cases referred to their branch offices; tracks total number of hate crimes filed by the Hate
Crime Unit and branch offices.
of cases filed by each agency plus the number of cases rejected by each agency. These counts
Inglewood
Long Beach
represent the miminum cases that would have had to be received in each agency in order to file or reject
Los Angeles...
Pasadena
San Diego
Torrance
Yuba
City Attorneys
Anaheim
Burbank
Tulare
Tuolumne
Ventura
Yolo.
Stanislaus..................
Sutter
Tehama
Trinity
Sierra.......................
Siskiyou.............................
Solano.......................
Sonoma........................
San Bernardino.....................
San Diego...................
San Francisco.............
Agency
the number of cases reported in these two reporting categories.
4The counts for these agencies in the "cases referred" category are determined by adding the total number
San Joaquin.............................
San Luis Obispo...........
San Mateo...................
Santa Barbara.......................
Santa Clara...........................
Santa Cruz...............................
Shasta..........................
Total hate crime
cases referred
Total cases filed
as hate crimes
Total cases filed as
non-bias motivated
crimes
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
44/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
42 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
Table 9
HATE CRIME CASE DISPOSITIONS
AS REPORTED BY
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS AND CITY ATTORNEYS
For the Period January 1 Through December 31, 2006
Agency Totaldispositions
Notconvicted
Convictions
Total
convictions
Hate crime convictions All other
convictionsTotalGuilty plea/
nolo contendere
Trial
verdict
Total 249.............................................. 31 218 140 102 38 78
County District Attorneys 245 31 214 136 98 38 78
Alameda..................................... 5 0 5 5 5 0 0
Alpine......................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amador... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butte........................................... 3 0 3 1 1 0 2
Calaveras................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Colusa........................................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Contra Costa.............................. 9 2 7 1 1 0 6
Del Norte.................................... 4 0 4 3 3 0 1
El Dorado................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fresno........................................ 2 0 2 1 0 1 1
Glenn... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0Humboldt.................................... 2 1 1 1 1 0 0
Imperial .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Inyo............................................ 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kern........................................... 4. 0 4 0 0 0 4
Kings.............................. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lake........................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lassen... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Los Angeles............................... 117. 17 100 71 39 32 29
Madera....................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marin.......................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mariposa... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mendocino.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 6. 1 5 1 1 0 4
Merced....................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Modoc.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mono.......................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monterey.................................... 2 0 2 1 1 0 1
Napa.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nevada....................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Orange....................................... 12 0 12 11 10 1 1
Placer......................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Plumas....................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Riverside.................................... 7 0 7 3 2 1 4
Sacramento................................ 2 0 2 2 2 0 0
San Benito... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
San Bernardino.......................... 2 1 1 0 0 0 1
San Diego... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 7. 0 7 5 5 0 2
San Francisco............................ 11 2 9 5 5 0 4
San Joaquin............................... 1 0 1 1 1 0 0
San Luis Obispo......................... 5 4 1 1 1 0 0
San Mateo.................................. 3 0 3 0 0 0 3
Santa Barbara............................ 1 0 1 0 0 0 1Santa Clara................................ 5 0 5 5 5 0 0
Santa Cruz................................. 3 0 3 2 2 0 1
Shasta........................................ 9 1 8 4 4 0 4
Sierra......................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Siskiyou.................................. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Solano........................................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sonoma...................................... 4 0 4 4 4 0 0
Stanislaus.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 2. 0 2 0 0 0 2
(continued)
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
45/59
DATA TABLES
DATA TABLES 43
Table 9 - continuedHATE CRIME CASE DISPOSITIONS
AS REPORTED BY
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS AND CITY ATTORNEYS
For the Period January 1 Through December 31, 2006
Agency Totaldispositions
Notconvicted
Convictions
Total
convictions
Hate crime convictions All other
convictionsTotalGuilty plea/
nolo contendere
Trial
verdict
Sutter......................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tehama...................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Trinity......................................... 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tulare......................................... 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
Tuolumne................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ventura.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8. 1 7 6 3 3 1
Yolo............................................ 3 1 2 1 1 0 1
Yuba........................................... 5 0 5 1 1 0 4
City Attorneys. 4 0 4 4 4 0 0
Anaheim..................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Burbank......................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Inglewood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Long Beach................................ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Los Angeles.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 2. 0 2 2 2 0 0
Pasadena. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
San Diego... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 2. 0 2 2 2 0 0
Torrance..................................... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Notes: Zero indicates that no case information was reported in this reporting category.e num er o comp a nts e y county str ct attorneys an c ty attorneys or t e num er o cases t at
resu te n ate crme convc tons cannot e n e to t e num er o ate crmes reporte y aw en orcement agences.See Criminal Justice Glossary (Appendix 5) for definition of terms.
Table 10HATE CRIME CASES, 1997-2006
COMPLAINTS FILED AND TOTAL CONVICTIONS AS REPORTED BY
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS
AND CITY ATTORNEYS
Type of
prosecuting
attorney
1997 1998 1999 2000
Complaints Total Complaints Total Complaints Total Complaints Total
filed convictions filed convictions filed convictions filed convictions
Total.......................... 313 280 244 174 372 229 360 275
County District Attorneys 259 240 226 158 341 206 341 262
City Attorneys 54 40 18 16 31 23 19 13
Type of
prosecuting
attorney
2001 2002 2003 2004
Complaints Total Complaints Total Complaints Total Complaints Total
filed convictions filed convictions filed convictions filed convictions
Total.......................... 314 207 351 253 304 197 277 242
County District Attorneys 290 187 333 236 293 188 263 229
City Attorneys.. 24 20 18 17 11 9 14 13
Type of
prosecuting
attorney
2005 2006
Complaints Total Complaints Total
filed convictions filed convictions
Total.......................... 330 238 272 218
County District Attorneys 315 227 262 214
City Attorneys 15 11 10 4
Notes: The number of complaints filed by county district attorneys and city attorneys or the number of cases that
resulted in hate crime convictions cannot be linked to the number of hate crimes reported by law enforcement agencies.
See Criminal Justice Glossary (Appendix 5) for definition of terms.
In 2006, adjustments were made to the 2005 conviction data; therefore, counts do not match previously published data.
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
46/59
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
47/59
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
48/59
46
Table 13HATE CRIMES, 1997-2006Offenses by Type of Crime
Type of crime1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percen
Total............................ 2,023 100.0 1,801 100.0 2,001 100.0 2,002 100.0 2,265 100.0 2,009 100.0 1,815 100.0 1,770 100.0
Violent crimes 1,489 73.6 1,232 68.4 1,353 67.6 1,312 65.5 1,662 73.4 1,517 75.5 1,252 69.0 1,135 64.1
Murder........................ 3 0.1 2 0.1 3 0.1 5 0.2 2 0.1 4 0.2 4 0.2 0 0.0
Forcible rape............... 1 0.0 1 0.1 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 1 0.0 2 0.1 0 0.0
Robbery...................... 52 2.6 41 2.3 71 3.5 55 2.7 63 2.8 75 3.7 61 3.4 60 3.4
Aggravated assault..... 338 16.7 246 13.7 238 11.9 321 16.0 250 11.0 272 13.5 179 9.9 246 13.9
Simple assault............ 380 18.8 385 21.4 427 21.3 374 18.7 524 23.1 478 23.8 477 26.3 360 20.3
Intimidation................. 715 35.3 557 30.9 613 30.6 556 27.8 822 36.3 687 34.2 529 29.1 469 26.5
Property crimes 534 26.4 569 31.6 648 32.4 690 34.5 603 26.6 492 24.5 563 31.0 635 35.9
Burglary................................. 23 1.1 15 0.8 16 0.8 34 1.7 38 1.7 33 1.6 25 1.4 27 1.5
Larceny-theft......................... 15 0.7 9 0.5 9 0.4 14 0.7 7 0.3 4 0.2 3 0.2 4 0.2
Motor vehicle theft................. 1 0.0 0 0.0 2 0.1 1 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0
Arson..................................... 18 0.9 10 0.6 11 0.5 10 0.5 10 0.4 4 0.2 5 0.3 11 0.6
Destruction/vandalism........... 477 23.6 535 29.7 610 30.5 631 31.5 548 24.2 451 22.4 530 29.2 593 33.5
Notes: Percentages may not add to subtotals or 100.0 because of rounding.
Dash indicates that percent changes are not calculated when the base number (2005) is less than 50, or that no data were reported.
From 1997 to 2001, a "hierarchy rule" was used to count the various types of crime. For a further explanation of the "hierarchy rule," see the Data Characteristics and Known Limitations Section
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
49/59
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
50/59
aPPEnDICES
Hate
Crime
-
8/9/2019 PX0674
51/59
HATE CRI ME I N CALI FORNI A, 200 6
50 HATE CRIME IN CALIFORNIA, 2006
APPENDIX 1BACKGROUND
In January 1986, the California Department of Justice(DOJ) submitted a report to the Legislature in responseto Senate Bill 2080 (Watson). This report, entitled Racial,
Ethnic, and Religious Crime Project, Preliminary Stepsto Establish Statewide Collection of Data, recommended
the following: