Part IV 資本結構與股利政策
description
Transcript of Part IV 資本結構與股利政策
-
Part IV 1314151617
13
-
1313.113.213.313.413.5 13.6EMH
13
-
13.1
13
How much debt and equity to sell
When (or if) to pay dividends
When to sell debt and equity
-
13
Fool Investors
Reduce Costs or Increase Subsidies
Create a New Security
-
13.2
13
efficient capital markets
-
13.3
13
Weak Form
Semi-Strong Form
Strong Form
-
13
-
13
EMH
Investors can throw darts to select stocks.
Prices are random or uncaused.
-
13.4
13
Rationality
Independent Deviations from Rationality
Arbitrage
-
13.5
13
Limits to Arbitrage
Earnings Surprises
Size
Value versus Growth
Crashes and Bubbles
-
13.6EMH
13
EMH
Investors should only expect to obtain a normal rate of return.
Firms should expect to receive the fair value for securities that they sell.
A firm can sell as many shares of stocks or bonds as it desires without depressing prices.
There is conflicting empirical evidence on all three points.
The price of a companys stock cannot be affected by a change in accounting.
Managers cannot time issues of stocks and bonds using publicly available information.
A firm can sell as many shares of stocks or bonds as it desires without depressing prices.
-
13
There are optical illusions, mirages, and apparent patterns in charts of stock market returns.
The truth is less interesting.
There is some evidence against market efficiency:
The tests of market efficiency are weak
2005 13-1
-
13
13
-
1414.114.2 14.3 14.4
13
-
14.1
13
par valuethe stated value on a stock certificate
dedicated capitalthe total par value
Authorized Common Stock Issued Common Stock
Capital Surplus
Retained Earnings
common equity
Market ValueBook Value
-
13
(1)(2)(3)
Cumulative VotingStraight Voting
Proxy Voting
Preferred Stocks
-
14.2
13
interestdividends
-
13
Amount of Issue, Date of Issue, Maturity
Denomination (Par value)
Annual Coupon, Dates of Coupon Payments
SecuritySinking Funds
Call ProvisionsCovenants
RatingYield-to-MaturityMarket price
-
14.3
13
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)bad
(2)good
-
14.4
13
Patterns of Financing
Internal financing
debt financing
external equity financing
-
13
-
14
13
-
1515.1 15.2 15.3 15.4MM 15.5MM
13
-
15.1
13
VvalueBbondsSshares
(1)
(2)
_1172094257.unknown
-
15.2
13
As it turns out, changes in capital structure benefit the stockholders if and only if the value of the firm increases.
-
15.3
13
Shares outstanding
-
13
EPSEarn Per ShareROAReturn On AssetROEReturn On Equity
-
13
EBIT
B/S=1
-
Homemade Leverage
13
B/S=1
Homemade Leverage
10%
-
MM
13
M&MModigliani-Miller Model
Homogeneous Expectations
Homogeneous Business Risk Classes
Perpetual Cash Flows
Perfect Capital Markets:
Perfect competition
Firms and investors can borrow/lend at the same rate
Equal access to all relevant information
No transaction costs
No taxes
M&MMM Proposition I
-
15.4MM
13
M&MMM Proposition II
is the interest rate (cost of debt)
is the return on (levered) equity (cost of equity)
is the firms weighted average cost of capital
is the return on unlevered equity (cost of capital)
B is the value of the firms debt or bonds
S is the value of the firms stock or equity
-
13
_1311541042.unknown
-
13
-
15.5MM
13
MM Proposition I
MM Proposition II
-
13
-
13
-
13
2005 15-1
_1172250846.unknown
-
13
15-1(p427)AlphaBetaAlphaall-equity5,000$20Beta$25,00012%EBIT$350,00012%a. Alphab. Betac. Betad. 20%e. (d)f. 20%Alpha
Beta20%g.
2005 15-1
-
13
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)A$15,00012%$5,000
$20,00020%Alpha
B$15,00020%Beta
$15,000$69,400
(g)BetaBeta
AlphaBeta
Beta
2005 15-1
_1209301685.unknown
_1209301716.unknown
_1209301741.unknown
_1209301846.unknown
_1209301703.unknown
_1209301598.unknown
_1209301611.unknown
_1209301413.unknown
-
13
15-6(p429)Rayburn$2,000,00018%Rayburn$400,00010%a. Rayburn
b.
c. (b)
(a)
2005 15-1
_1311572750.unknown
_1311572895.unknown
_1311572677.unknown
-
13
(a)
(b)
(c)
2005 15-1
_1209294994.unknown
_1209301107.unknown
_1209301180.unknown
_1209301215.unknown
_1209301138.unknown
_1209295081.unknown
_1209294855.unknown
_1209294871.unknown
_1209294814.unknown
-
13
15-11(p430) Digital1,000,000$10Digital$1,500,000Michael Lefton1%10%20%40%60%a. Michael Leftonb. Michael Lefton
2005 15-1
-
13
(a)
1%
20%
40%
60%
(b)
20%
40%
60%
2005 15-1
_1209295920.unknown
_1209302164.unknown
_1209302433.unknown
_1209302566.unknown
_1209302578.unknown
_1209302553.unknown
_1209302352.unknown
_1209302030.unknown
_1209302057.unknown
_1209295921.unknown
_1209295767.unknown
_1209295919.unknown
_1209295694.unknown
-
13
15-13(p431) $500,000$1,700,00010%34%$306,000a. b.
2005 15-1
-
13
(a)
(b)
2005 15-1
_1209296710.unknown
_1209296755.unknown
_1209296790.unknown
_1209296735.unknown
_1209296642.unknown
-
13
15-16(p431) Gibson$1,200,0008%$200,00012%Gibson35%a. b. c. (b)
2005 15-1
-
13
(a)
(b)
2005 15-1
_1209302754.unknown
_1209302799.unknown
_1209302821.unknown
_1209302877.unknown
_1209302766.unknown
_1209302732.unknown
-
13
15-19(p431) Williamson2.5
15%10%35%a. Williamson
b. Williamson
c. Williamson0.75
1.5
2005 15-1
_1219326783.unknown
_1219326795.unknown
_1219326766.unknown
-
13
(a)
2005 15-1
_1209303657.unknown
_1209305433.unknown
_1209306309.unknown
_1209306402.unknown
_1209306533.unknown
_1209306368.unknown
_1209306253.unknown
_1209305194.unknown
_1209305418.unknown
_1209305170.unknown
_1209303269.unknown
_1209303309.unknown
_1209302821.unknown
-
13
(b)
(c)
2005 15-1
_1209884386.unknown
_1209884690.unknown
_1209884726.unknown
_1209884807.unknown
_1209884397.unknown
_1209306652.unknown
_1209306794.unknown
_1209306575.unknown
-
15
13
-
1616.116.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 16.9
13
-
16.1
13
-
13
1
KnightDay(1)$10050%(2)$5050%Knight$49Day$6010%
_1172775184.unknown
_1172775741.unknown
_1172775766.unknown
_1172775786.unknown
_1172775200.unknown
_1172775160.unknown
-
13
Day
_1172776051.unknown
_1172776242.unknown
-
13
Day$15
Day
Day$5020%$43.1839%$68.18$61.36
_1172776566.unknown
_1172776801.unknown
-
13
Direct Costs
Legal and administrative costs (tend to be a small percentage of firm value).
Indirect Costs
Impaired ability to conduct business (e.g., lost sales)
Agency Costs
Selfish strategy 1: Incentive to take large risks
Selfish strategy 2: Incentive toward underinvestment
Selfish Strategy 3: Milking the property
-
13
2
$100
$150$145$50$70
-
13
3
$1,000$1,700
$900$1,000$800
_1172789004.unknown
_1172789134.unknown
-
16.2
13
(1) Protective Covenants
(2) Debt Consolidation
Negative covenant:
Pay dividends beyond specified amount.
Sell more senior debt & amount of new debt is limited.
Refund existing bond issue with new bonds paying lower interest rate.
Buy another companys bonds.
Positive covenant:
Use proceeds from sale of assets for other assets.
Allow redemption in event of merger or spin off.
Maintain good condition of assets.
Provide audited financial information.
-
16.3
13
The Trade-off Theory
There is a trade-off between the tax advantage of debt and the costs of financial distress. It is difficult to express this with a precise and rigorous formula.
-
13
MMThe essence of the M&M intuition is that
depends on the cash flow of the firm; capital structure just slices the pie.
-
16.4
13
The Signaling Theory
The firms capital structure is optimized where the marginal subsidy to debt equals the marginal cost.
Investors view debt as a signal of firm value
Firms with low anticipated profits will take on a low level of debt.
Firms with high anticipated profits will take on high levels of debt.
A manager that takes on more debt than is optimal in order to fool investors will pay the cost in the long run.
-
16.5
13
An individual will work harder for a firm if he is one of the owners than if he is just a hired hand.
-
13
4
Ms. Pagell $1,000,000$2,000,000(1)12%$2,000,000(2)$200,000Ms. Pagell 6$300,00010$400,000
Ms. Pagell $100,000$100,000
6
_1172825117.unknown
-
13
Who bears the burden of these agency costs?
(1)(2)LBO
Leverage Buyouts, LBO
Free Cash Flow Hypothesis
While managers may have motive to partake in perquisites, they also need opportunity. Free cash flow provides this opportunity.
The free cash flow hypothesis says that an increase in dividends should benefit the stockholders by reducing the ability of managers to pursue wasteful activities.
The free cash flow hypothesis also argues that an increase in debt will reduce the ability of managers to pursue wasteful activities more effectively than dividend increases.
-
16.6
13
The Pecking-Order Theory
The pecking-order theory is at odds with the trade-off theory:
(1) There is no target D/E ratio.
(2) Profitable firms use less debt.
(3) Companies like financial slack
-
16.7
13
Growth implies significant equity financing, even in a world with low bankruptcy costs.
Thus, high-growth firms will have lower debt ratios than low-growth firms.
Growth is an essential feature of the real world; as a result, 100% debt financing is sub-optimal. 100%
-
13
5
$1,00010%10%EBIT$100
_1172865345.unknown
-
13
EBIT5%5%5%5%
_1172865904.unknown
-
16.8
13
The Miller Model
-
13
-
13
-
16.9
13
(1)Most Corporations Have Low Debt-Asset Ratios.
(2)Changes in Financial Leverage Affect Firm Value.
Stock price increases with increases in leverage and vice-versa; this is consistent with M&M with taxes.
Another interpretation is that firms signal good news when they lever up.
(3)There are Differences in Capital Structure Across Industries.
(4)There is evidence that firms behave as if they had a target Debt to Equity ratio.
-
13
(1)Taxes
If corporate tax rates are higher than bondholder tax rates, there is an advantage to debt.
(2)Types of Assets
The costs of financial distress depend on the types of assets the firm has.
(3)Uncertainty of Operating Income
Even without debt, firms with uncertain operating income have high probability of experiencing financial distress.
(4)Pecking Order and Financial Slack
Theory stating that firms prefer to issue debt rather than equity if internal finance is insufficient
2005 16-1
-
16
13
-
1717.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 17.517.6
13
-
17.1
13
APV
NPV
NPVF
There are four side effects of financing:
(1)The Tax Subsidy to Debt
(2)The Costs of Issuing New Securities
(3)The Costs of Financial Distress
(4)Subsidies to Debt Financing
_1173421556.unknown
-
13
1
$475,000$500,00072%
$126,229.50
_1173422779.unknown
_1173423066.unknown
_1173423344.unknown
_1173422932.unknown
_1173422721.unknown
-
17.2
13
There are three steps in the FTE Approach:
(1)Calculate the levered cash flows, LCF
(2)Calculate
(3)Valuation of the levered cash flows at .
_1173423841.unknown
_1173426822.unknown
_1173423825.unknown
-
13
2
$475,000$500,00072%
$126,229.5010%
_1173422779.unknown
_1173424200.unknown
_1173424468.unknown
_1173422721.unknown
-
13
LCF
-
17.3
13
_1173426650.unknown
_1173426754.unknown
-
13
3
$475,000$500,00072%
$126,229.50
_1173422779.unknown
_1173426428.unknown
_1173426463.unknown
_1173422932.unknown
_1173422721.unknown
-
13
-
17.4
13
Guidelines:
(1)WACCFTE
(2)APV
WACC
-
17.5
13
4
WWE25%widget10%AWAW40%12%1.540%8.5%8%WWE
WWEAW
AW
AW
security market lineSML
_1173436775.unknown
_1173436899.unknown
_1173437040.unknown
_1173437303.unknown
_1173437316.unknown
_1173437662.unknown
_1173437192.unknown
_1173436988.unknown
_1173436865.unknown
_1173436881.unknown
_1173436806.unknown
_1173428908.unknown
_1173428919.unknown
_1173428896.unknown
-
13
AW
AW
WWE
_1173438022.unknown
_1173438159.unknown
_1173438428.unknown
_1173438557.unknown
_1173438567.unknown
_1173438473.unknown
_1173438220.unknown
_1173438045.unknown
_1173438057.unknown
_1173438034.unknown
_1173437593.unknown
_1173437763.unknown
_1173437811.unknown
_1173437624.unknown
_1173437460.unknown
_1173437571.unknown
_1173437420.unknown
-
17.6
13
-
13
5
C.F.Lee scale-enhancing project$100$20034%210%8.5%
SML
_1173445091.unknown
_1173445361.unknown
_1173445606.unknown
_1173445615.unknown
_1173445480.unknown
_1173445238.unknown
_1173437192.unknown
-
13
_1173445717.unknown
_1173445744.unknown
_1173445833.unknown
_1173446161.unknown
_1173446191.unknown
_1173445761.unknown
_1173445733.unknown
_1173445480.unknown
_1173445671.unknown
_1173437624.unknown
-
17
13