Javůrek Aleš

OCENĚNÍ 09 POROTHERM DŮM STUDENT 2009 zvláštní cena časopisu Stavebnictví a interiér odměna časopisu Stavebnictví odměna internetového portálu www.TvujDum.cz

08 2. místo v soutěži o Stavbu Jihomoravského kraje 2007 s projektem CITY PLANT, kategorie student

08 čestné uznání v soutěži ROCKHOUSE 07 s objektem pro dočasné ubytování turistů na Šumavě

08 PASIVNÍ DŮM V KRUPCE U TEPLIC zvláštní cena za architektonickou úroveň soutěžního návrhu a vzhled domu zvláštní cena výrobce za účelnou a správnou aplikaci izolačních materiálů Knauf Insultation

05 křeslo BLACK & WHITE zařazeno do mezinárodní přehlídky studentských prací Cena prof. Jindřicha Halabaly

REALIZACE 09 Moravany MŠ, ATX architekti, spoluautor

BIO 09-10 studium na TU Tampere, School of Architecture 08 titul Bc na FA VUT v Brně 04 - 08 studium na FA VUT v Brně 05 titul Ing. na FAST VUT v Brně 00 - 05 studium na FAST VUT v Brně 94 - 00 Reálné Gymnázium Prostějov, Prostějov 82 narozen v Prostějově, okr. Prostějov

PRAXE 08 - 09 ATX architekti 08 spolupráce s Ing. arch. Ivanem Vaškem 03 - 08 spolupráce s ateliérem Moraving

PC 3DsMax (V-ray), Autocad, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Ilustrator, SketchUp CorelDRAW, MS Office, Microstation

JAZYK anličtina, němčina, polština

aleš javůrekportfolio

WOODEN COMMUNITY HOUSE IN VUORES Category \ SCHOOL WORKS

Vuores located at the borderline of Tampere and Lempäälä is one of the biggest and most interesting city building projects at the 21st century in Finland.

The area is situated in the south-ern part of the housing fair area (year 2012), between the central square of the area(“Taatanaukio”) and the cen-tral park of Vuores. Buildings around it are two-storey and the residents of this area drive throughthe central square. The housing fair area, “Virolainen”, will be a compact garden city for 600 citizens, where every block is connected to park or outdoor recreation ground. In zoning map 300 m2 is indicated for building floor area at the competition building lot.

The site for square is situated on unusual place, because it is not in the heartbeat of town but on periphery.The situation is compli-cated by road crossing the square. Square should be mainly for people, not for car. Anyway, we have to do it. Push the square on the same height like sidewalk. Square will not be di-vided to the two small parts. Cars will have to go slowly, because they have to cross “retarder” and easily feel that is a different space not only curve. In the center I put cylinder which works like orientation, meeting point and mainly like sensitive and intuitive solution for people and driv-ers because the way is clear without special corridors /at night drivers will be following lights between pavement/

Square is not only place. It is a space. When do we use simple master planning rules /what is road, street, square?/ Square starts to be square when it is 3 dimensional. Ac-cording to this reasons I designed basic volume of house. This volume is bigger than we need for rooms but we have to use this space for /terraces, semi-spaces/ different spaces between inside and outside. Finland is a country where there are often used glazed terraces because everywhere is awesome nature but weather is not convient and this kind of spaces allow and offer new kind of spending time. Next steps of design are visible on small illustrations at the board. The most visible is game with height. The biggest floor areas and spaces need more than classical 3 meters so I designed them accord-ing to their function. The second vis-ible things are atriums. They helped to lead the natural light to every rooms which they nedded.

Construction is simple wooden skel-etal structure. All layers are precisiely described in detail.

roofing mPVCgeotextile 3mmOSB 18 mmdeflationary gapAIRROCK ND 400 mmOSB + sealing tapewapour foilAIRROCK LD 40 mmwooden facing

wooden floor 12mmfoam polyethylen 3mmOSB 3x 35 mmPE foil1 x NAIP - SBS + NPconcrete 100 mmgravel bedding 150 mmroofing mPVCgeotextile 3mmOSB 18 mmdeflationary gap AIRROCK ND 400 mmOSB +sealing tape

wooden facing 20mmIROCK ND 40OSB + sealing tape AIRROCK ND 350 mmdiffuse foil - TYVEKstring + deflationary gap 50 mmcontra string 40 mmwodden facing - mountain larch

FLOOR PLAN 1:200

SECTION OF OUTSIDE WALL 1:100

MASTER PLAN 1:1000

SECTION 1:200

x

x =>

101

102

103

116

101/ ENTRANCE PORCH / VERANDAH 15,6 m2102/ ENTRANCE HALL 31,1 m2103/ OFFICE 17,1 m2104/ TOILET / WOMAN 6,1 m2105/ TOILET / INVALID´S 5,0 m2106/ TOILET / MAN 6,1 m2107/ COMUNICATION 19,1 m2108/ MULTIPURPOSE POOM 89,2 m2109/ STORE / MP 7,1 m2110/ KITCHEN 17,3 m2111/ CAFETERIA 16,4 m2112/ DRESSING ROOM / 1 8,4 m2113/ SHOWER ROOM / 1 5,9 m2114/ SAUNA 6,3 m2115/ DRESSING ROOM / 2 8,4 m2116/ SHOWER ROOM / 2 5,9 m2117/ TECHNICAL ROOM 7,0 m2118/ STORE / RH 7,0 m2119/ ROOM FOR HOBIES / 1 18,2 m2120/ ROOM FOR HOBIES / 2 18,6 m2 121/ OUTDOOR STORAGE 12,1m2122/ OUTDOOR TERRACES 396,1m2

104

105

106107

108

109

110

111

112 113

114

115117

118

120119

121

122

current situation

- space of square is devided by road

put part of the road to the same level like square

+ car has to go slowly+ square is not devided

+ meeting point+ orientation point+ logically show the way

road

street

field

square

+ shape create square parking and technical building was done it

+ connection with nature

+ other functions on site do not hide the view to nature

private houseprivate space

public housepublic space

community house = public house withprivate and public spaces

hight limit 7mdifferent functionsdifferent spaces

shape according tourban analyses

limit of volume functions

a lot of different functions

lighting corridors main spaces => bigger spacesbigger space => higher space

opennings according to functions

natural light everywhere

flexible space separate spaces concert dancing cinema banquete theatre

SITE

Site is located in the center of Tampere, few meters near the crossing main traffiics and pedestrians ways. Park and small gallery is situated at present. Current

gallery wasn t designed like a exhibition space/gallery/museum and probably thats the reason of not really good position on the site in park. Gallery is almost

invisible, hidden by trees because volume of this building is quite small. This fact is forced by residental buildings around the site. Architecture in Finland is very

young comparing to other countries in Europe and thats the reason why historical architecture should be more protected . This building is one of the examples.

Site is rounded by ways but definitevely the biggest potencial incomporable to another has the southern.

ART MUSEUMS

For us, people, when love art and everything around is visitation of museums, galleries, etc. quite common, but try to ask your “normal” :-) friends how many times

visited museum or when it was last time. you wil be surprised! For many people art is something unimportant for wierd people is usualy placed to monumental

closed architecture. It s totaly opposite than commercial building which want to get people inside. Big outlays work everywhere :-)

IDEA

my idea is based on solutions to these problems or tasks. We can t move the old gallery, but we can design volumes which one will frame and guide. I used basic

components of architecture-groins/corners/crossroads for these function from southern street. Two of them are in the corners and the third is from cross-road.

Park is divided by many pedestrian ways in grass. Why will not use this fact for solution of museum? People will be crossing park and leisurely in the same time

will be in museum. Visiting of museum will be one of part their lives!

LIGHTING

Exhibition spaces use natural light as much as possible according to “lighting analyses”. Outlays aren t open to south because its not friendly to all the types of

exhibits within two volumes on the southern border . These spaces should be served for mainly big sculptures which can be visible from the most important

street and will not be destroyed.

CONSTRUCTION

Combined walls and pilars system from reinforced concrete. Construction of roofing slopes was consulted with civil enengineer specializated in concrete and

steel constructions and she recommended me prestressed concrete slab 400 mm. Slabs are technicaly divided to triangle slabs resting on three sides/22meters.

art

public facilites

exterior

workshop

natural south lighting

natural lighting

NORTHEN-WEST VIEW SOUTH-EAST VIEW NORTH-EAST VIEW SOUTH-WEST VIEW

ARS-4516 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN / ADVANCED COURSE 2010 / ART MUSEUM / ALEŠ JAVŮREK


AREA PLAN / 2000

PASSED PARK = BEEN IN MUSEUM

VOLUMES FRAMED OLD HIDDEN GALERY


SITE

PUBLIC TRAFFIC

PUBLIC TRAFFICPUB

BUS STOP

BUS STOP BUS STOP BUS STOP

CARS ERS ENTRANCNTRANCEE

PEDESTRIANS WAYS

CC ENTRA EN NCE ACC EB TTB AC EBB TTB RALICC EB RLBBB RBLBBLICPUPPUUB RALIC EUB RLBP RRUBLLICBLUPUBPPUUUBL RALICLIC UUBLLUBPP RRUUBLLICBLIPUPUUPUBPPPUUBL RALICBLILIC BUBP RP RRUUBLBLICBLIUPUBPPPUUBL ABLILIC RBUBPP RUBLBLICPUUBPPU

UNDERGROUND PARKING

+5,000

+5,000

+5,000

+5,000

+5,000

+13,600

+15,200

-3,500

ATRACTIVE SITE = FUTURE OVERBUILD

AREA PLAN / 500


A

A

B

B

ENTRANCE FLOOR PLAN

FLOOR ELEVATION / -4,000 101 ENTRANCE HALL 541m2

FLOOR ELEVATION / -9,000 EXHIBITION SPACE 5855m2

COMUNICATION x05 TRAFIC COMUNICATION 383m2

101

x05

101

X05

-107

-101

-102

-103

-104

-105

-106

-107

-108

102

103

104105106107

x01

x04

x02

x03

x01


-1 FLOOR PLAN

FLOOR ELEVATION / -9,000 EXHIBITION SPACES

-101 EXHIBITION SPACE 1 / LARGE VOLUME 1212m2 -102 EXHIBITION SPACE 2 / LARGE VOLUME 750m2-103 EXHIBITION SPACE 3 / LARGE VOLUME 451m2-104 EXHIBITION SPACE 4 / LARGE VOLUME 230m2-105 EXHIBITION SPACE 5 / PAINTINGS ETC. 2332m2-106 EXHIBITION SPACE 6 / DARK SPACE 124m2-107 WORKSHOPS / LECTURES / STUDIO 340m2

-108 TOILETS 50m2-109 STORAGE 138m2

FLOOR ELEVATION / -4,000ENTRANCE

101 ENTRANCE HALL 541m2102 OFFICE 80m2103 TOILETS 53m2104 BOOKSHOP 53m2105 CLOAK ROOM 42m2106 TICKETS / INFO 28m2107 CAFFETERIA 73m2

COMUNICATION x01 COMUNICATION CORIDOR / ROOTS SPACE 156m2x02 FIRE / ESCAPE 1 / ROOTS SPACE 165m2x03 FIRE / ESCAPE 2 / ROOTS SPACE 160m2x04 FIRE / ESCAPE 3 17m2x05 TRAFFIC CORIDOR 383m2

PARTIAL SECTION / 50

EXTERIOR

CAFFETERIA

WORKSHOP

INTERIOR

A

A

B

B


A

A

B

B

-2 FLOOR PLAN

STORAGEFLOOR ELEVATION / -17,000

-302 MANIPULATION SPACE / EXPORT /IMPORT 180m2 -304 WORKSHOP 105m2-305 STORAGE 1 / LARGE VOLUME 623m2-306 STORAGE 2 / LARGE VOLUME 380m2-307 STORAGE 3 / SMALL VOLUME 80m2-308 TECHNICAL ROOM 124m2

FLOOR ELEVATION / -13,000

-201 STORAGE 3 / SMALL VOLUME 145m2

PARKING 5177m2AIR/RAID SHELTER 340m2

COMUNICATION x01 COMUNICATION CORIDOR / ROOTS SPACE 156m2x02 FIRE / ESCAPE 1 / ROOTS SPACE 165m2x03 FIRE / ESCAPE 2 / ROOTS SPACE 160m2x04 FIRE / ESCAPE 3 17m2

x01

x04

x02

x03

-304

-302

-305

-308

-306

-201

-202


A

A

B

B

-3 FLOOR PLAN FLOOR ELEVATION / -17,000

STORAGE-301 GATEHOUSE 37m2-302 MANIPULATION SPACE / EXPORT /IMPORT 180m2-303 PERSONAL BACKGROUND 65m2-304 WORKSHOP 105m2-305 STORAGE 1 / LARGE VOLUME 623m2-306 STORAGE 2 / LARGE VOLUME 380m2-307 STORAGE 3 / SMALL VOLUME 80m2-308 TECHNICAL ROOM 124m2

PARKING 5517m2

COMUNICATION x01 COMUNICATION CORIDOR / ROOTS SPACE 156m2x02 FIRE / ESCAPE 1 / ROOTS SPACE 165m2x03 FIRE / ESCAPE 2 / ROOTS SPACE 160m2x04 FIRE / ESCAPE 3 17m2

x01

x04

x02

x03

-304

-302

-305

-308

-306

-301

-307

-303

SECTION A-A

+15,200

+13,600

+5,000

0,000

-3,500

-8,000

-13,000

-9,000

-17,000

WESTERN ELEVATION

EASTERN ELEVATION

+15,200

+13,600

+5,000

0,000

+15,200

+13,600

+5,000

0,000


SECTION B-B

+15,200

+13,600

+5,000

0,000

-4,500

-13,000

-9,000

-17,000

SOUTHERN ELEVATION

NORTHERN ELEVATION

+15,200

+13,600

+5,000

0,000

+15,200

+13,600

+5,000

0,000


roots space

comunication

storage / personnel facilities

parking

air-raid shelter

exhibition space / big volume

exhibition space / small volume

exhibition space / dark space

exhibition space / workshop

exhibition space / old gallery

storage for old gallery

entrance hall

public facilities

office and personnel facilities


PARKS / PUISTOTanalysis / analyysit

london

prag

paris

tampere

tokyo

wien

� Finland therefore also all Tampere is characterizedby beautifull nature which we can not see everywhere,nevertheless they are used very rarely. Why?

� My analysis of parks in Tampere is deduced frompark analysis of big cities all over the world. On the pictureyou can see the map of a city, aerial view and a photo of apark. The nature (greenery and water elements) ishighlighted in green colour. The situation is almost the sameeverywhere, high building density and only rarely we can seebigger green areas. These areas present the parks. In thepictures of it is evident that people use them, although theyform only a small part of nature. This lack of green areas inthe cities is the cause why people use them so frequently.The necessity to be part of the nature is a human needwhich has always been here and is going to be here in thefuture as well. Looking at the pictures of Tampere we cansee almost the inverse situation. The greenery and lakes arealmost everywhere and that is why parks in the town are notused. It is just a duplication of a purpose which is aroundthe city everywhere. Tampere is a park.

PARKS / PUISTOTthesis / teesit

introductionanalyses & thesis structure public transport pedestrian prob parks waterfronts barriers

area map railway area city centre hameenpuisto ratina kekkosentieproposalrough ideasreferences

TUT, urban planning AC, AYS-2516Everybody's Tampere, visionsDecember 2009

content

TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLO

lems

GY

� I suggest to keep the nature untouched and virgin on the periphery, because it is definitely one of the great values that Finland has. Artificial parks in centers have to fulfil their purposes (sport, cultural, etc.). The substantial thing is to offer people something they haven´t got yet. Defenitely it is not the greenery itself.

traffic

people

parking

fast lane

slower lane

Function

The first task therefore is to incorporate elements and functions to this area which should attract people. These functions change very quickly and thus it is difficult to project a concrete area. But if we use the system of modules 3x3x6 mof a rectangle and triangle profile we will get a construction which we can modify in its case and also in its total composition.

Transportation

Any kinds of function need to have a systems of supply, transportation and parking. This needs capacity are considerable and need fast transportation through the whole Hameenpuisto. In this area we won´t find a place which would function well and would not limit peoples movement. That is why I would like to place them under the ground. I design always two fast lane roads in each direction which provide fast and smooth traffic and one slower lane road which serve for acces, departure or joining the parking (viz the picture). The situation is complicated in case of four rows of trees which are situated planted, from the beginning to the end. Fortunately they are almost plant with a geometrical exactness and thus in the designed construction (viz the picture) we can leave the trees as they are. Of course this leads to higher construction costs. How many, where and which of them should be kept is not in my decision making competency. My solution however enables to choose any kind of solution which depends on the amount invested.

Park

The park will stay on its place, in addition it won´t be divided, dissected and it will bring many types of views and perspectives . It only moves to the new roof of the construction/ structure.

fast lane

slower lane

pedestrian, bike

� My project deals with Hameenpuisto.Hameenpuisto is an exact example of a park in thecenter which doesn´t work (viz. Tampere park). Thecurent situation is even worse due to the transportcorridor which goes on both sides through of the wholeHameenpuisto. The recent situation is not convenient foranybody - cars cannot pass too quickly and easily. Thewhole line of the park is divided into small areas, thusfrom the entire park is left with small useless andineffectively used rectangles.

� My task is to suggest a proposal which eliminatesthese problems and which should be convenient for both,people and transportation.

your name (Ales)NAME OF THE PROJECT / FINNISH NAME

introductionanalyses & thesisproposal master plan Tobias Ben Petteri Ales Albert Satu Vesa Emmi Gosha Tomas Romanrough ideasreferences

TUT, urban planning AC, AYS-2516Everybody's Tampere, visionsDecember 2009

content

TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY

20°

18°

nevytáp�no

24°

miniální solárnní zisky

nejv�tší solárnínínzisky°z

miniální soláární zisky

nejv�tší solárnrní zisky°

miniální solárnrní zisky

nejv�tší solárnnízisky°

rodi�e

spole�né prostory

d�tské pokoje

odina s malými d�tmiro

rodi�e


odd�lené pokoje

rodina s dospívajícími d�tmi

2 bytové jednotky

senio�i


pronajímaný byt

17,5 CBDF

11,5 AKU

POT + Miako

beton. deska

želbet. v�nec

44 EKO

parkovánípp

vozovka

kapacitakk un�nívysoké prosluun�níst�ední proslun�nínízké proslun

�nípolední proslun�pmístností m

n�nívysoké proslun�níst�ední proslu�nínízké proslun�

n�nídopolední prosludmístností m

lun�nívysoké proslun�níst�ední prosln�nínízké proslu

lun�ní odpolední proslmístností m

parcelace

jednosm�rná ávozovka

skupina 7 parcelel

parcelace

jednosm�rná vovozovkaobousm�rná vozozovka

skupina 49 parcell

jedna parceela

parcela

01

04

03

0205

06

07

09 0810

11

12

131313

1414

155

16

17

18

SOUTĚŽPOROTHERM DŮM 2009

d�ti do školky

d�ti do školkyd�ti

komerce

kancelá�e

kancelá�e

kancelá�e

kancelá�e

mám d�tiu sebe

snídan�

snídan�

máma p�íjdena ob�d

ZÁKRES DO FOTOGRAFIEPOHLED DO VNIT�NÍHO ATRIA

AT9399

Náš návrh vychází z aspektu, že dnešní �lov�k tráví v�tšinu svého �asu v zam�stnání a �asové nároky na dopravu v rušném m�st� jsou �ím dál tím v�tší. �as se stává hlavním problémem sou�asné rodiny. Proto jsme umístili mate�skou školu na st�echu vyšší administrativní budovy, které bývají kolem center m�st, v míst� nejv�tšího po�tu pracovních p�íležitostí. Tím jsme odstranili problém s náro�ným a stresujícím p�ejížd�ním p�es celé m�sto p�i p�evážení d�tí do vzdálen�jších mate�ských škol a následné cest� do práce a stejn� tak p�i cest� z práce. Rodi� má možnost mít své dít� v blízkosti svého pracovišt�, kde ho m�že kdykoli vyzvednout a maximáln� tak využít volný �as.Dále vycházíme ze základního principu v�tšího m�sta v �eské republice, kde je dostate�ný po�et mate�ských škol v hlavních obytných zónách, kde byly školky dimenzovány pro jednotlivá sídlišt� a jejich po�et je dostate�ný. Naopak nar�stá pot�eba mate�ských škol pro nov� vzniklé satelitní zóny a pro zalid�ující se centra m�st. V t�chto oblastech je ale problém s jejich umíst�ním. Jednotlivé satelity nenaplní kapacitu mate�ské školy a v centru m�sta je hustá, v�tšinou vícepodlažní zástavba a je dost nesnadné vytvo�it zde p�íjemné prost�edí, které by m�la mate�ská škola poskytovat. Umíst�ní školky na st�echu administrativní budovy p�ímo v míst� pracovišt� poskytuje východisko pro ob� tyto lokality. Snadno smontovatelný, variabilní modulární systém Koma nabízí ideální konstruk�ní �ešení.

0.2

0.3

0.1

0.1

0.2

0.32.1

2.2

2.2

2.5

2.6

2.7

2.6

2.6

2.09

2.32.4

1.1

1.3

1.6

1.4

1.5

1.7

1.8

1.9

0.90.9

0.11

0.10

0.4

0.50.6

0.7

0.8

0.8

SPOLE�NÉ PROSTORY0.1 SCHODIŠT0.2 VÝTAH0.3 VSTUPNÍ FOYER, �EKÁRNA0.4 KLIDOVÁ KOMORA0.5 CHODBA 0.6 ZÁZEMÍ PRO PERSONÁL KUCHYN0.7 OH�ÍVARNA A P�ÍPRAVNA JÍDLA0.8 VÝDEJOVÝ PULT0.9 SKLAD HRA�EK0.10 ZAHRADA0.11 PODIUM PRO PO�ÁDÁNÍ P�EDSTAVENÍ

T�ÍDA 011.1 ŠATNA1.2 CHODBA 1.3 JÍDELNA, PRACOVNÍ �INNOSTI1.4 KANCELÁ� U�ITELKY1.5 ZÁZEMÍ PRO U�ITELKU1.6 SKLAD HRA�EK1.7 HYGIENICKÁ MÍSTRNOST1.8 HLAVNÍ PROSTOR PRO HRY, SPANÍ1.9 SKLAD LŽEK T�ÍDA 022.1 ŠATNA 2.2 JÍDELNA / PRACOVNÍ �INNOSTI2.3 KANCELÁ� U�ITELKY 2.4 ZÁZEMÍ PRO U�ITELKU2.5 SKLAD HRA�EK2.6 HLAVNÍ PROSTOR PRO HRY, SPANÍ2.7 HYGIENICKÁ MÍSTNOST2.8 SKLAD LŽEK

NÁSTUPNÍ PODLAŽÍ0.1 VSTUPNÍ MÍSTNOST0.2 SCHODIŠT0.3 VÝTAH

LEGENDA MÍSTNOSTÍ

PDORYS VSTUPNÍHO PODLAŽÍ M 1 : 100 PDORYS HLAVNÍHO PODLAŽÍ M 1 : 100

SITUACE M 1 : 500

TYPICKÝ POHLED NA �ELNÍ FASÁDU M 1 : 100 TYPICKÝ POHLED NA BO�NÍ FASÁDU M 1 : 100

�EZ M 1 : 100

INTERIÉR

AT9399

TYPICKÝ POHLED NA BO�NÍ FASÁDU M 1 : 100

INTERIÉR

Javůrek Aleš

Documents

Transcript of Javůrek Aleš