Bejenaru Ludmila
Transcript of Bejenaru Ludmila
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
1/17
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
2/17
LudmilaBEJENARU
REFLEXEBIZANTINENCULTURACENTRALIESTEUROPEAN
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
3/17
REFLEXEBIZANTINENCULTURACENTRALIESTEUROPEAN
Autor:LudmilaBEJENARUConductortiinific:Prof.univ.dr.IoanaNicolae(AndreiGrigor)
Lucrare realizat n cadrul proiectului Valorificarea identitilor culturale n
procesele globale, cofinanat din Fondul Social European prin Programul
OperaionalSectorialDezvoltareaResurselorUmane20072013,contractul
definanarenr.POSDRU/89/1.5/S/59758.
Titlurile idrepturiledeproprietateintelectual iindustrial asuprarezultatelor obinute n cadrul stagiului de cercetare postdoctoral aparin
AcademieiRomne.
Puncteledevedereexprimatenlucrareaparinautoruluiinuangajeaz
ComisiaEuropean iAcademiaRomn,beneficiaraproiectului.
Exemplargratuit.Comercializareanar istrintateesteinterzis.
Reproducerea,fieiparial ipeoricesuport,esteposibil numaicuacordulprealabil
alAcademieiRomne.
ISBN9789731671253 Depozitlegal:Trim.II2013
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
4/17
LudmilaBEJENARU
Reflexebizantinenculturacentraliesteuropean
EdituraMuzeuluiNaionalalLiteraturiiRomne
ColeciaAULAMAGNA
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
5/17
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
6/17
5
Cuprins
BIZANULIMODELULCULTURALALLUMIICRETINECUVNTNAINTE .......................................................................................... 9
I.BIZANULCAENTITATEMENTAL IMOTENIREAEUROPEAN................................................................................................... 14
1.ImperiulBizantin:definiie,etimologie,periodizare.............................14 2.ContribuiilastudiulBizanului.Reprezentaniiopere......................20
a.InteresulRenateriipentruculturabizantin....................................20
b.Istoriografiabizantinnspaiulcentraliesteuropean.Influene,perspective............................................................................27
c.Influenelebizantinenconstituireaspiritualitiiromneti..........43
d.Bizan dup Bizan spaiulspiritualalEuropeidesudest........53
e.DelapanslavismlaideologiiProetContrabizantine......................54
II.BIZANULNRAPORTCUCIVILIZAIILEICULTURILECENTRALISUDESTEUROPENE............................................................ 61
1.Unitateastructuralaavechilorculturidinaria centralisudesteuropean....................................................................................................61
a.CodexTheodosianus .............................................................................63
b.Cartearomneasc denvtur iindreptarealegii .................64
c.DrumuluiMtsii,DrumulSriiiDrumulmaredelavaregilagreci.....................................................................................................66
2.SlaviiiBizanul ..........................................................................................72
a.Slavii oenigm etnografic ...........................................................72
b.KnejiiruiirelaiilecuBizanul.........................................................74
c.Slaviidesud.Bulgaria,SloveniaiSerbia ..........................................85
III.INFLUENABIZANTIN NICONOGRAFIAISTILURILEARTEINAREALURILECENTRALISUDESTEUROPENE............... 89
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
7/17
6
1.Artaimonahismulcomponenteeseniale alecommonwealthulmedievalorthodoxbizantin. ................................................................90
a.TradiiaisihastnrileOrtodoxiei.....................................................91
b.Athos leagnulvietiimonahale.......................................................100
c.Isihasmulsrbimodelulpustniciei .................................................103
d.Renatereaisihast rus ......................................................................106
e.Micareapaisianncontextpanortodox .........................................111
f.Reprezentrialemonahismuluinliteratur iart ........................116
g.SchimburileculturalepuniunificatoarensudestulEuropei..................................................................................................126
3.Canonulbizantin.Componentelestilistice alearteibizantine........... 128
4.Valenelemodeluluiculturalbizantinnarhitectura dinspaiulcentraliesteuropean .............................................................................141
a.Complexitateainflueneibizantineasupraculturiiruse................141
5.Valenebizantineniconografie..............................................................152
a.Icoana mijlocdetransmitereamesajuluievanghelic ..................152
b.IcoanaluiHristos fundamentaliconografieicretine.................155
c.IcoanaMaiciiDomnului......................................................................157
d.TeofanGrecul modelulartistuluiisihast.....................................160
e.Troiaicondiiadeafirus .............................................................161
6.SfntaCuvioas ParaschevamultfolositoaresimbolalunitiiOrtodoxieidepretutindeni .....................................................................165
a.ImagineaSfinteiParaschevanBulgaria...........................................167
b.ReprezentareaSfnteiParaschevan mozaic..................................170
c.BisericicunumeleSfinteiParaschiva ................................................172
7.NebuniantruHristossau ncercareaderevenirelaBizan..........174
a.NebuniantruHristos,fenomenulnebunieimistice...................174
b.SpiritulnebunieintruHristosnculturarus............................176
c.FilmulOstrovulsaudespreactualitatea nebunieintruHristos.................................................................................................178
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
8/17
7
IV.RSFRNGERIALEBIZANTINISMULUIDINSPAIULROMNESCNCIRCUITULVALORILORCULTURALE ESTEUROPENE .................................................................................................... 180
1.Participarearomnilorlapromovareaspirituluibizantinnspaiulculturalcentaliesteuropean...................................................180
2.ContribuiileluitefancelMarelapstrareaunitiispaiuluiculturalbizantin........................................................................................182
a.Mnstireapova ...............................................................................184
b.MnstireaCurchi................................................................................186
c.MnstireaCpriana............................................................................187
d.CetilemoldavedinregiuneaPrutNistru .....................................189
e.CetateaHotin ........................................................................................190
f.CetateaSoroca .......................................................................................192
g.CetateaOrhei........................................................................................193
h.CetateaAlb..........................................................................................193
i.CetateaChilia.........................................................................................194
3.ElenaVoloanca prezen remarcabilnculturarus din
secolulalXVlea........................................................................................195
a.BroderiileEleneiVoloanca................................................................205
CONCLUZII ....................................................................................................... 210
BIBLIOGRAFIEGENERAL ........................................................................... 221
ADDENDA
FOREWORD ................................................................................ 226
TABLEOFCONTENTS ............................................................. 231
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
9/17
226
ADDENDA
Foreword
Byzantiumandtheculturalmodel
ofcristianworld
Attheallegedborder temporal,mental,culturalbetweenold andmodern ,betweencommon and exceptional ,Byzantiumisrevealedinall its grandeur and fame. The Byzantine Empire, with its more thanmillennial existence, has always concerned the great spirits, promptingvividdiscussions.Admiredorchallengedbyourcontemporaries,territorialandspiritual,unknowntoothers,Byzantiumaimstoeventuallyregaintheplace it deserves on the world stage of history and culture. Even if it
perished from a strictly institutionalized point of view, Byzantium is stillwaiting for its social and political dimensions to be explored andevaluated along with the role that it undoubtedly had in defining theculturalprofile/modeloftheChristianworld,especiallyoftheOrthodoxone.Thetitleofourproject ByzantinereflectionsinCentralandEasternEuropeanculture ismotivatedbytheimportanceofByzantiumitselfandby the need to fill a void in the interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary/transdisciplinary research, which opens an unexpected horizon ofreading, of information that is subject to a concentric and condensedanalysisandinterpretation.
The overall objective of the project is that of addressing from aninterdisciplinary / multidisciplinary / transdisciplinary perspective thereflections of Byzantine origin in Central and Eastern European
civilizationsandcultures,ofinvestigatingthewayinwhichByzantiumhadfound expression, was mirrored and reflected in the civilizations and
culturesfromthegeoculturalareasmentioned,particularlythroughitsreal
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
10/17
227
legacy,Orthodoxy,fromwhichtheChristianartconstantlysprings,whichisthe same in terms of tradition,but always anotherby adapting to currenttimes.ThescientificnoveltyandoriginalityofourprojectliesinthecomplexinvestigationofByzantinetrends,elementsandideaswhichappearincentralandEasternEuropeanculturethroughtheapplicationofnewmethodologiesof historical, theological, philosophical and culturological research of theproblem, united by this interdisciplinary scientific approach involvinginvestigativemethodsspecifictodisciplinessuchasculturalhistoriography,history of ideas, art history, cultural anthropology, philosophy of culture,
sociology, literary history, history and philosophy of law, as well ascombinatorialmethodsthatcomplementeachotherorinteract.
Webelievethattheresearchthemeproposed iswelcomegiventhatthe aspects of Byzantine reflection in Central and Eastern Europe culturewere not fully reportedby exegetes, much less in the Romanian culturalspace, where an interdisciplinary approach to the problem is almostnonexistent.Theappropriatenessofthisresearchtheme isjustifiedbytheexistenceofasmallnumberofarticles,studiesandworksdedicatedtotheproposedissue,andespeciallybytheneedtoemphasizethewayinwhichtheByzantineartandhistoryrelatestotherevaluationofculturalidentitiesofdifferentplacesandcultures.Theuniquecharacterofthethemeofourresearchprojectalsocomesfromtherecoveryofaconsiderableamountofculturalhistorical and theoretical information about thephenomenon ofByzantine culture footprint inCentral andEasternEuropean cultural
space. The contribution of the research we suggest consists not only insynthesizing some observations regarding the way in which Byzantiumwas reflected in the cultural space discussed,but rather, inhighlightingthe interdisciplinary relationships which forge the Byzantine reflectionsonaculturalintertextualitythatcrossesareasandevencontinents.
Also, our contribution aims to highlight the key aspects ofinterculturalism and acculturation of the analyzed cultural spaces bycertain cultural, historical implications, through the Byzantine Christianrite, matrimonial alliances, ethnological component, contributions in thefield of legal, administrative, military and diplomatic organization. Theimportanceoftheproposedsubjectisoverwhelming,becauseitintegrates
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
11/17
228
intotheindissolubleunityofmanyculturalcivilizationsandspacesand
also opens and offers prospects to know the whole by means of a
commonsuperiorspace,promotingtheunityindiversityofCentraland
EasternEuropeanculturalspace.ResearchesonthecircuitofvaluesintheculturalareaoftheEasternandSouthernSlavs,knowingly,cometoenrichour project, while the national perspective of each of the cultures inquestioncalls formeditationandcompletionrevaluation, forthereaderscontinuation of analysis on ones own, for the discovery of new insightsintoknowledge.
Theresearchprojectaimedatachievingacomprehensiveoverviewof thevarious aspects ofByzantine culture reflections revolving in the
southoftheDanube,intheRomanianandSlavicEasternarea,compared
tothegeneralEuropeanculturalphenomena.Also,wesoughttohighlighttheoriginalityofeachcultures,describinganddefiningtheirindependenceand individuality, knowing that each of the cultures of the area of focuskeptaspecificstockofvalues.Webelievethatthefruitofourapproach,themonograph Reflexe bizantine n cultura central i esteuropean(ByzantineReflections inCentralandEasternEuropeanCulture), willbefound useful primarilyby the specialists in Byzantinology, art history,literature,philosophyofcultureandculturalhistoriography,whoaregiventhe opportunity to find in a single work interdisciplinary /multidisciplinary/transdisciplinaryreferencesandinterpretationsabout
theByzantineculturalimpactonCentralandEasternEuropeancultures.
Our good thoughts and feelings of gratitude go to the RomanianAcademy, and particularly to Academician Eugen Simion; without thelogisticalsupportoftheAcademyourresearchand thepublishingofthisvolumewouldnothavebeenpossible.
To Mr. Ioan Valeriu Frank a great and wise partner of dialogue
and to the team of project POSDRU/89/1. 5/S/59758 Valorificareaidentitilor culturale n procesele globale (Revaluation of culturalidentities in globalprocesses) many thanks and congratulations forprojectmanagement.
We addressournot atall formal thanks toPhD Prof. Ioana Nicolae(Andrei Grigor) who gave us the support we required for our
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
12/17
229
investigationontheByzantinereflectionsinCentralandEasternEuropeanculture.
For our European partners Department of Byzantinology andBalkanic studies of Saint Klement Ohridski University, Sofia, Bulgaria,and the Center of Slavistics of the University of Riga, Latvia, where weperformedourresearchinternshipsundertheguidanceofprofessorsPhDHab. Hristo Matanovi and PhD. Hab Ludmila Sproge prosperity, newscientific results, new opportunities for the intellectual and professionaldevelopment of students and to facilitate quality research through activeparticipationinthedevelopmentoftheEuropeanHigherEducationArea.
Manythankstothelibraries,whosecollectionofbooksweusedduringthe traineeship: National Library Saint Kiril and Methodius in Sofia, theBulgarian Academy of Sciences Library, the Library of the Institute ofBalkanisticinSofia,NationalLibraryofLatvia,theLibraryofAcademiesofSciencesofLatvia,Romania,Russia,Moldova,theRussianNationalLibrary,the Fundamental Library of Humanities from Lomonosov University, theuniversityLibrariesofIai,Chernivtsi,Riga,Sofia.
The impactof the research internship was primarily definedby the
factthatweenjoyedtheprestigeofaEuropeantrainingundertheguidanceofprestigiousteachersinRomania,BulgariaandLatvia,andtheexperiencewas shared through discussions, written reports, the files and CD ofinternships.Thepotentialimpactofthetransferofknowledgeisreflectedintheireffectivevalorizationofpracticalandscientificactivities.Wewillusethe knowledge acquired during the research internships in the drafting ofwork, while the skills and abilities willbe used in the provision of qualityeducation in the field of Central and Southeastern European cultures andcivilizations,bypromotingtheEuropeandimensionineducation.
The cognition and discovery of other cultural spaces and European
andglobalapproaches,by interactingwith the institutionsorganizing theinternships,gaveustheopportunitytointeractwithotherculturesbesidesthe Romanian one, helped us overcome language and culturalbarriers,unfounded prejudices, become spiritually richer, discover theextraordinary unity in diversity, built mostly on Orthodoxy. In themulticulturalcontextoffered,thepromotionoftolerance(towardscultural
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
13/17
230
differencesorofothertypes)hasbeenanacquisitionofaEuropeanvaluetransferableandapplicabletootherculturesaswell.
Theestablishmentanddelineationofabibliographicdatabaseinthefield, the elaboration of records, the completion of the personal libraryduring the scholarship period with over 100 titles in the field, representsthe added value of our research internship from an interdisciplinary /multidisciplinary/transdisciplinaryperspectiveregardingthestudyoftheByzantinereflectionsonthecentralandEasternEuropeancivilizationsandcultures,but what is more important is the investigation of the way inwhichByzantiumhadfoundexpression,wasmirroredandreflectedintheCentral and SouthEastern European civilizations and cultures from thenationalperspectiveofeachoftheculturesinquestion.
Obviously,allthemeritsofthismonographarealsoduetotheonesmentioned above, while any possible shortcomings, omissions, belongexclusivelytotheauthor.
PhDUniversityLecturerLudmilaBejenaru
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
14/17
231
Tableofcontents
BYZANTIUMANDTHECULTURALMODELOFTHECHRISTIANWORLDFOREWORD...................................................................................... 9
I.BYZANTIUMASMENTALENTITYANDEUROPEANHERITAGE....................................................................................................... 14
1.ByzantineEmpire:definition,etymology,timing ..................................14
2.ResearchesontheByzantinehistoryandspirituality.Representativesandworks.......................................................................20
a.RenaissancesinterestinByzantineculture.......................................20
b.ByzantinehistoriographyinCentralandEasternEurope.Influences,interferences,Perspectives ..............................................27
c.ByzantineinfluencesintheformationofRomanianspirituality .............................................................................................43
d.ByzantiumafterByzantium spiritualspaceofSouthEastEurope.....................................................................................................53
e.FrompanslavismtoforandagainstByzantineideologies .............54
II.BYZANTIUMINRELATIONTOCENTRALANDSOUTHEASTERNEUROPEANCIVILIZATIONSANDCULTURES ................. 61
1.StructuralunitoftheancientculturesofCentralandSouthEasternEurope ...........................................................................................61
a.CodexTheodosianus ............................................................................63
b.Romanianbookofdoctrineandlawstraightening ........................64
c.TheroadofSilk andtheGreatroadfromVarangianstotheGreeks ....................................................................................................66
2.SlavsandByzantium..................................................................................72
a.TheSlavs anethnographicenigma.................................................72
b.RussianprincesandrelationswithByzantium .................................74
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
15/17
232
c.SouthSlavs.Bulgaria,SloveniaandSerbia.........................................85
III.BYZANTINEINFLUENCEINICONOGRAPHYANDARTSTYLESINCENTRALANDSOUTHEASTERNEUROPE ..................... 89
1.Artandmonasticism essentialcomponentsofthemedievalOrthodoxByzantinecommonwealth.......................................................90
a.HesychastictraditioninOrthodoxcountries.....................................91
b.Athos Monasticlifecradle................................................................100
c.Serbianhesychasmandthehermitagemodel..................................103 d.Russianhesychasticrevival................................................................106
e.PaisianmovementinapanOrthodoxcontext.................................111
f.Representationsofmonasticisminliteratureandart......................116
g.Culturalexchanges unifyingbridgesinSouthEasternEurope...................................................................................................126
3.Byzantinecanon.StylisticcomponentsofByzantineart ...................128
4.ValencesoftheByzantineculturalmodelinthearchitectureoftheCentralandEasternEuropeanarea................................................141
a.ComplexityofByzantineinfluenceonRussianculture.................141
5.Byzantinevalencesiniconographya.Theicon meansoftransmittingtheGospelmessage ...........................................................152
a.IconofChrist thefoundationofChristianiconography..............152
b.TheIconofVirginMary......................................................................155
c.TheophanestheGreekthemodeloftheartisthesychast .........157
d.AndreiRublevstrinityandtheconditionof beingRussian ......160
e.FerapontovoandtheRubliovianmodelofharmonysearch .........161
6.St.Parascheva symbolofOrthodoxunityallovertheworld ..........1657.FoolishnessforChrist ortheAttempttoreturntoByzantium .......174
a.FoolishnessforChrist ,themysticalmadnessphenomenon.......174
b.ThespiritofFoolishnessforChrist inRussianculture................176
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
16/17
233
c.TheislandorabouttheactualityoftheFoolishnessforChrist...................................................................................................178
IV.REFLECTIONSOFTHEROMANIANBYZANTINISMINTHEEASTERNEUROPEANCULTURALVALUESCIRCUIT....................... 180
1.RomaniansparticipationinpromotingtheByzantinespiritintheCentralandEastEuropeanculturalarea.......................................180
2.StephentheGreatscontributionstopreservingtheunityofByzantineculturalarea ...........................................................................182
a.TipovaMonastery ...............................................................................184
b.CurchiMonastery ................................................................................186
c.CaprianaMonastery............................................................................187
d.TheMoldovancitiesfromthePrutDniesterregion.......................189
e.Hotin .....................................................................................................190
f.Sorocacity .............................................................................................192
g.Orheicity ..............................................................................................193
h.WhiteCity ............................................................................................193
i.Chiliacity ..............................................................................................194
3.ElenaVoloancaremarkablepresenceinthefifteenthcenturyRussianculture..........................................................................................195
a.ElenaVoloancasembroidery ...............................................................205
CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................ 210
GENERALREFERENCES................................................................................ 221
-
7/22/2019 Bejenaru Ludmila
17/17
EdituraMuzeuluiNaionalalLiteraturiiRomne
CNCSPN II ACRED ED 20120374
Copertacoleciei:AULAMAGNAMachetare,tehnoredactareiprezentaregrafic:
LuminiaLOGIN,NicolaeLOGIN
Logistic editorial idiseminare:
OvidiuSRBU,
Radu
AMAN
Traducereasumaruluiisintezei,corectur ibundetiparasiguratedeautor
ISBN9789731671253 Apruttrim.II2013