3 < 23m 50cm 50cm aaa 30cm 50cm 01 - 新潟市 50cm aaa 30cm 50cm 01 Created Date 4/19/2012 9:25:12 PM ...
1 Beam Test Results of USTC LMRPC modules (50cm) Yongjie Sun presnted by Hongfang Chen.
-
Upload
keanu-dimmitt -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of 1 Beam Test Results of USTC LMRPC modules (50cm) Yongjie Sun presnted by Hongfang Chen.
1
Beam Test Results of
USTC LMRPC modules (50cm)
Yongjie Sun
presnted by Hongfang Chen
2
Outline
Long-strip MRPC structure Results of August beam test at GSI Summary
3
MRPC structure (endview)
5 x 250μm gaps
5 x 250μm gaps
Readout strips
HV
2.5cm
Readout strips: 2.5 cm x 50 cmHV electrode: Licron spray ~40 MΩ/□
Made of window glass of 0.7 mm thick
4
MRPC #1 (topview)
55 cm
24.1cm
2.5cm
0.6cm
Gaps between strips: 0.6 cm
5
MRPC #2 (topview)
Top/bottom pcb
The readout strips are “hollowed-out” alternately.
Removed: 5 mm x 4
Left: 1 mm x 5
Removed: 2.5 mm x 9
Left: 0.25 mm x 10
6
MRPC #3 (topview)
55 cm
24.1cm
2.5cm0.7cm
Gaps between strips: 0.7 cm (upper part)
0.8 cm (lower part)
0.8cm
7
6m
Setup
ProtonBeam
Pb
2m
42 cmPMT 1,2PMT 3,4
PMT 5,6TSU MRPC
USTC MRPC
Platform PlatformPlatform
xy
8
Photo of the setup
9
DAQ Logic
T
D
C
Q
D
C
PMT 1-4(5)
DiscriminatorNIMECL VULOM, Logic
Delay NIMECL
LMRPC1-6 (left)7-12(right)
FEE
Delay Discriminator NIMECL
Delay
Delay
Gate
Trigger area: 2 cm x 4 cm (without back_scint.)
STOP
10
ADC1 ADC2
ADC3 ADC4
PMT calibration<
t 1-(
t 3+
t 4)/
2>
ADC1
<t 2
-(t 3
+t 4
)/2>
ADC2
<t 3
-(t 1
+t 2
)/2>
ADC3 ADC4
<t 4
-(t 1
+t 2
)/2>
11
((t3+t4)-(t1+t2))/4
Resolution~67 ps
12
T-(t1+t2+t3+t4)/4
T-(t1+t2+t3+t4)/4
T-(
t1+
t2+
t3+
t4)/
4
ADC
<T-(
t1+
t2+
t3+
t4)/
4>
ADC
MRPC CalibrationIntrinsic timing resolution = 67 ps (including momentum spread)
HV=7kV
13
Efficiency and resolution plateau
67 ps
97%
14
Position scan (±7 kV)
No significant efficiency drop in the gap
Trigger Area: 2 cm wide
From both “charge sharing” and cross talk.
15
Valid TDCs and valid QDCs (3 sigma above pedestal)Valid TDCs
Cross TalkMRPC #1
Trigger on the strip center:“Cross talk” at neighbor strips: <~3%
Trigger Area: 2 cm wide
16
Cross TalkMRPC #2
Valid TDCs and QDCs
17
Efficiency vs. PositionMRPC #2
Valid TDCs
HV= 7kV
18
Valid TDCs and valid QDCs (3 sigma above pedestal)
19
Cross TalkMRPC #3
20
Efficiency vs. PositionMRPC #3
Valid TDCs
21
Track information using the data of SSD
the following analysis is based on the instruction of : Y.P. Zhang,P.-A. Loizeau Data structure of final NTUPLE and a short description about how to use the silicon tracking system
the data files used : run_0005.root, run_0006.root, ......, run_0020.root,where the USTC-MRPC was settled at the same position. run_0021.root, the MRPC moved by 12mm.
22
Hits position profile on MRPC
the profile is about 3cm x 2 cm
the following analysis will base on these SSD position cuts and charge cuts
23
Tranverse profile-- efficiency vs positionfor MRPC#1
run0005-0020
24
Efficiency vs Positionfor MRPC#1
data file, run_0021.root
edge effects
6mm-gap
25
Combined data
26
Summary
The cross talk for neighbour strip ~3%for modules MRPC#1, 2, 3. (50cm strip)
Next step 1m long strip
Thank You !
谢谢!
27
28
Signal Charge vs Position
near the edge of stripat the middle of strip
29
Time Resolution of PMT timing
( (t3+t4)-(t1+t2) )/4
after T-A correction
Sigma(pmt) = 2.08 *35ps = 73ps
30
RPC time resolution
cuts: SSD cust PMT cuts
resolution:sigma(rpc) = 69 ps
35ps/ch
31
Hit tranverse profile
position distribution
32
pmt resolution vs position
((t3 + t4) - (t1 + t2) )/4
33
rpc
34
rpc resolution vs position
35
eff and reo vs position
36
Longitudinal
37
edge effects
the profile is also quite clear,
and we can see that the beam hits between two strips of the MRPC
38
(2) pmt cuts: pmt-pair charge: q1+q2, q3+q4 take out 5% at the low range side, and take a
nother 25% at the high range side time difference: T1-T2, T3-T4 2.5%, 2.5% position difference: (T1-T2)-(T3-T4) 2.5%, 2.5% time of flight: ((T3+T4)-(T1+T2))/4 0.5%, 0.5%
39
edge effects