قثؤٽ ڌ١اپتدا ڋؽاصت٭ا ٸٽاڄ١...
Transcript of قثؤٽ ڌ١اپتدا ڋؽاصت٭ا ٸٽاڄ١...
-
[email protected] :Email : * :
1393 26/03/1393 : 01/02/1392 :
43 - 56
- ) (
1 -1
.
. - 1391
. - 05/5081
. 73/21523690
.
. 5
.
-
1392 / 44
: .
.
(. 2000 1)
. .
(. 1390 )
((TEV
( ) .
)
1 Torras
(.
( ) .
) (.
) (.
.
) (
: .
(. 1374) 2
2Recreational Value
-
45/ ) ( -
.( CVM) 1
.
-
.
.
(. 1391 )
. -
.
( 1991) 2 .
740
1 Contingent Valuation Method 2 Miller and Mendelson
. ( 2008) 3
.
27
50 75/71
. ( 2011) 4
. 25/11
. 124 10/2
51/15 ( 2011) .
.
. 21
10 1385 ( 1351. )
3 Baral et al. 4 Majumdar et al.
-
1392 / 46
. 201500
. ( 1385 )
5/2 8/5 ( 1388) .
. 2200
95040
( 1390) .
. 3/6 ( 1392 )
.
23/12578 . 14339182200
36322 75245
-
70 . -
1344
.
-
.
2 1 .
.
. )
(. 1388
(. 1389)
1Dichotomous Choice 2Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice
-
47/ ) ( -
.
(. 1389)
.
U :
(1) ( ) ( )
U( 1 ) Y A
S)( . -
( 1.984 1) (U )
: (2) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 Hanemann
""
) ( Pi)(. 1996 2
( A) : ( 3 )
(3) ( )
( )
* ( ) +
3 ( )
- .
4 ) 2000 .)
:
.
. + -
2 Park & loomis 3Logistic 4 lee & Han
-
1392 / 48
. ( A )
(. 2006 1 )
) (. 1388
(A. (
(4)
( )
( )
(
, ) -
( )
( )
-
.
i
.
1 Whit
( Xik ) ( 3 )
. ( 5 )(5)
( )
K
. ( 6 )
(6) [
( ) ]
( 6 )
(. 1391 )
.
(. 1390 ) .
(7) :
-
49/ ) ( -
. 1 396 .
. 31 365 WTP
. -
:
.
. 6000 3000 1500
. .
( 3000 )
( 1500 )
( 6000 ) .
.
. CV
1Double- bounded Dichotomous Choice (DDC)
. . .
.
1390 6 . 1391
.
. Excel Shazam
1 . 63/37
. 28/11 17/13
33/3 38/9274 . 1/5629 . 58/40
-
1392 / 50
. - -1
() 63/37 28/11 76 21
17/13 33/3 22
() 49/3 25/1 8 1 (1 ) 84/0 38/0 1
) ( 38/9274 1/5629 40000 2500
) ( 09/4 79/2 12 1
)( 58/40 01/81 689 3
:
365
) ( 69 3000 296.
. ) ( )
) 17( 52( .
. ) (
202 . 94 ) ( (. 2 )
(. 3 ) 15000 ( 34/95 ) 348 356
17
( . 66/4)
.
.
-
51/ ) ( -
-2
( 3000)
( 1500)
( 6000)
94 52 296
75/24 14/ 25 09/81
202 17 69
34/55 66/4 91/18
296 69 365
09/81 91/18 100
WTP -3
WTP
15000 10000 8000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1500
348 4 31 21 38 101 26 75 33 19 34/95 09/11 49/8 75/5 41/10 67/27 12/7 55/20 04/9 20/5
-
4 .
8
5
. .
.
)
(
)
-
1392 / 52
( . -4
)( t
- 4669/0 6160/1 7250/0 1716/1
-229/010-3 -1029/1 -382/12 7734/010-4 -9576/010-3
6728/010-7 9689/0 1730/7 391/010-7 281/010-6
-0356/0 -2066/0 -5718/1 0944/0 -1485/0
1025/0 1432/0 5051/1 2842/0 4277/0 028/0 5916/0 5413/3 0329/0 1168/0 032/0 -2243/0 -4998/3 0382/0 -1336/0 6999/010-3 05038/0 1584/2 0013/0 0029/0
-1272/010-4 -7965/010-3 -0049/0 0106/0 -5306/010-4 Log-likelihood function=-284. 19 Probability (L0R. Statistic) =0. 0000 Likelihood ratio statistic=271. 06 Percentage of Right Predictions=0. 76
McFadden R-square=0. 32
4
.
) ( .
.
. .
4 . 06/271
. ( 32/0)
.
4
. . 76
76 .
-
53/ ) ( -
.
( )
WTP WTP
: ( 8 )
(8) ( )
(
* +
)
WTP( 8 ) 05/5081
. 8 WTP
( 9 )
: )
( ;
25/1506658351;72500 09/4 ;05/5081
25/1506658351
. 73/21523690
WTP
. ( 1388 ) )
( 1999) . ( 2008)
)( )(
00022/0
)( .
.
)(
( ) 6728/0 10-7
. .
-
1392 / 54
.
( 1999) ( 2008)
( 1388) ( 1387) ( 1390)
.
)(
)( 032/0
.
1 . ( 2000) 2( 2007)
( 1390) ( 1389) .
.
)(
)( 028/0
.
1Buyinza et al 2 Scarpa et al
( 2005) ( 2002 )( 1389( )1388 )
( . 1390 )
( )
6999/0 10-3 )( .
.
( . 1388)
.
: -
(. 91/67 )
.
-
55/ ) ( -
.
-
.
. . -1. 1392
. . 1-18. 4:
. 1391 . -2
. 1 : . 115-108 . . -3 . 1385
. 72 . :
. 15-24. 1388 . . -4
) (.
. 10. 3: 16 . . . -5 . 1388
: ) (.
. 357-343. 4 : . . -6
. 1390 . . . 61-78. 2: 3 . . -7
. 1387 .
. . 43-52. 4:
. -8. . . 1374.
437 . . . -9
. 1391 .
-79. 1. : . 64
. . -10. 1389 .
. . 51-58. 54 :
. 1390 . . -11
. -
. 322-329. 25: 3 . . . . -12
. 1389 . .
-
1392 / 56
. . 171-189. 1: 4
. 1353 . -13 . .
. 13514- Adams, c. Motta, R. S. , Arigoni, R.
Reid, J. Eberabach, C and Almeida, P. 2007. The use of contingent valuation for
evaluating protected areas in the
developing world: Economic valuation of
Morro does Diablo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, Sao Paulo State (Brazil).
Ecological Economics 66.
15- Hanemann, W. M. 1984. Welfare evaluation in contingent valuation
experiments with discrete responses,
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71: 332-341 pp.
16- Lee, C. and Han, S. 2002; Estimating the use and preservation values of national
parks tourism resources using a contingent valuation method, Tourism
Management, 23: 531-540P.
17- Miller, p. and R, Mendelson. 1991. Valuing Ecotourism in Madagascar.
CABI Pubic Mimeo, USA, 264P. 18- Salazar S and Menendez L. 2007.
Estimating then non-market benefits of an urban park: Does proximity matter? Land
UsePolicy. 24: 296-305P.
19- Torres, M. 2000. The total economic value of Amazonian forestation. 1978-
1993. Ecological Economics. 33: 283-
297P. 20- Whit, P. 2006. Public preferences
and Willingness to pay nature
conservation in the North York Moors
National park. Journal of Environmental Management55: 1-13P.
21- White, P. C. L. , and Lovett, J. C. 1999; Public preferences and willingness-to-pay for nature conservation in the
North York Moors National Park. UK.
Journal of Environmental Management ,55. 1-13P.
22- Baral, N. Stern, M and Bhattarai, R.
2008. Contingent valuation of ecotourism
in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal:
Implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecological
Economics: 66. 218-227P.