Post on 09-Aug-2015
RF Transceiver Module DesignChapter 5
Low Noise Amplifier李健榮助理教授
Department of Electronic EngineeringNational Taipei University of Technology
Outline
• Basic Amplifier Configurations
• Cascode Low Noise Amplifier (LNA)
• Feedback Topologies
• Classical Two-port Noise Theory
• Input Matching for an LNA
• Noise Figure and Bias Current
• Effect of the Cascode on Noise Figure
• Summary
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT2/26
Simple Transistor Amplifier (I)
• Common-emitter (CE) configuration
• Common-base (CB) configuration
• Common-collector (CC) configuration
CE (driver)
CCV
inV
outV
EEV
CB (cascode)
CCV
inV
outV
EEV
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT3/26
CC (buffer)
CCV
inV
outV
EEV
• Bipolar Transistor Amplifier
• MOSFET Transistor Amplifier
Simple Transistor Amplifier (II)
CE CB CC
Current Gain High (β) Low (~1) High (1+β)
Voltage Gain High High Low (~1)
Power Gain High Medium High
Zin Medium Low High
Zout Medium High Low
I/O Phasing 180o In-phase In-phase
CS CG CD
Voltage Gain High High Low (~1)
Power Gain High Medium High
Zin High Low High
Zout High High Low
I/O Phasing 180o In-phase In-phase
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT4/26
Common-Emitter Configuration
• Gain
• Input Impedance
o Lvo m L
i b e
v r ZA g Z
v r r rπ
π
= = −+
≃
er : B-E diode resistance as seen from emitter
er rπ β= 1m eg r=
in bZ r rπ= +
For low frequencies, the parasitic capacitanceshave been ignored and rb has been assume to below compared to .rπ
CE (driver)
CCV
inV
outV
EEV
LZormg vπrπCπ
br
ivov
Cµ
vπ
+
−
+
−
+
−
and
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT5/26
Miller Effect (I)
• Impedance that connects from input to output
fZ
LZ
inv outv
inZ outZ
vA
( ) 1fin
inin out f v
ZvZ
v v Z A= =
− −
( ) ( ) for 11 1
foutout f v
out in f v
ZvZ Z A
v v Z A= = >>
− −≃
fC
LZ
inV outV
inZ outZ
vA
( )1 11 1
fin
v f v
sCZ
A sC A= =
+ +
( ) ( )1 1
1 1 1 1f
outv f v
sCZ
A sC A= =
+ +
Like larger cap
Slightly larger
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT6/26
Miller Effect (II)
• At radio frequencies:
• Miller’s theorem
Cπ : Low impedance
Cµ : Provides feedback
( )1 1oA m L m L
vC C C g Z C g Z
vµ µ µπ
= − = +
≃
11 1B
o m L
vC C C C
v g Zπ
µ µ µ
= − = +
≃
The dominant pole is usually the one formed byand AC Cπ
( ) ( )1
1
2 ||p
b s A
fr r R C Cπ ππ
=+ +
sR : source resistance
Note that as ZL decreases, CA is reducedand the dominant pole frequency isincreased.
Cµvπ ov
vπ ov
AC
BC
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT7/26
Simplified CE Small-signal Model
• Simplified model for transistor above the dominant pole:Ignore and just use in transistor model with little error.
• Knowing the pole frequency, we can estimate the gain athigher frequencies, assuming that there are no other polespresent, with
( )
1
1
vov
p
AA f
fj
f
=+
目前無法顯示此圖像。
rπ
br
iv vπ Cπ
Cµ
mg vπ or LZ ovsv
sR
+
−
+
−
+
−
+
−
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT8/26
Common-Base Configuration
• CB amplifier is often combined with the CE amplifier to froman LNA but it can be used by itself as well.
• Low Zin when driven from a current source, it can pass currentthrough it with near unity gain up to very high frequency.Therefore, with an appropriate choice of impedance levels, itcan also provide voltage gain.
ini
br
vπ
Cµ
Cπmg vπrπ LZ
outi
+
−
Ignoring output impedance
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT9/26
Cascode LNA (I)
• CB + CE to form a cascode LNA.
• Since the CB amplifier has a currentgain of approximately 1, then,
ic1 ≈ ic2 = gm1vi .
• The gain is the same as for the CEamplifier. However, the cascodetransistor reduces the feedback of ,resulting in increased high-frequency gain.
1Cµ
CR
CCV
CbiasV
outv
inv
EEV
Driver Q1
Cascode Q2
2ci
1ci
( ) ( )1
1 1
1
2 || 2p
b s
fr r R C Cπ π µπ
=+ +
21 mg≈
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT10/26
Cascode LNA (II)
• Advantages:
� Improves frequency response.
� Adding another transistor improves the isolation.
• Disadvantages:
� Additional poles can become a problem for a large load resistance.
� An additional bias voltage is required, and if this cascode bias node isnot properly decoupled, instability can occur.
� Reduce signal swing at a given supply voltage, compared to the simpleCE amplifier.
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT11/26
Common-Collector Configuration (I)
• The CC amplifier (emitter follower) is a very useful general-purpose amplifier.
• Voltage gain is close to 1 (buffer).
• High input impedance and low output impedance (goodbuffer/output stage).
ER
CCV
iv
EEV
ov
ivB s bR R r= +
vπ rπ Cπ
ER
mg vπ
Cµ
+
−
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT12/26
Common-Collector Configuration (II)
• Miller effect is not a problem, since the collector is grounded.
• Since is typically much less than , it can be left out of theanalysis with little impact on the gain.
• The input impedance:
• The output impedance:
CµCπ
ivB s bR R r= +
vπ rπ Cπ
ER
mg vπ
Cµ
+
−
( )1A E mZ Z R g Zπ π= + +
1
1B B
out em m
r R sC r RZ r
g r sC r gπ π π
π π π
+ += ≈ ≈+ +
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT13/26
CE with Series Feedback (I)
• CE with Series Feedback (Emitter Degeneration)
� Cascode:
Higher frequencies, superiorreverse isolation, but suffersfrom reduced linearity.
� Most CE and cascode LNAs:
Employing the degenerationtransforms the impedance realpart looking into the base to ahigher impedance formatching. De-generation alsotrades gain for linearity.
outRF
CCV
1L 1C LR
inRF 1Q
eL
CE tuned LNA
CCV
1L 1C LR
2Q
1Q
eL
inRF
biasVoutRF
Cascode tuned LNA
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT14/26
CE with Series Feedback (II)
• As the degeneration becomes larger, the gain becomes solelydependent on the ratio of the two impedances.
• If ZE is inductive, then it will become a real resistance whenreflected to base (raise Zin, useful for matching purposes).
• Conversely, if ZE is capacitive, it will tend to reduce Zin andcan even make it negative.
1
out m L L
in EEm E
v g R R
v ZZg Z
Zπ
−= ≈ −
+ +
sR rπ Cπ mg vπ
EL EREC
xiinv
vπ
Zπ
EZ
+
−
( )1in E mZ Z Z g Zπ π= + +
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT15/26
CE with Shunt Feedback (I)
• Matching over a broad bandwidth while having minimalimpact on the noise figure.
• Rf forms the feedback and Cf allow for independent biasing.
• Can be modified to become a cascode amplifier.
• Ignoring the Miller effect and assuming Cf is a short circuit(1/ωCf << Rf ), the gain is given by
1 1
Lm L
o m LFv
L Li
f f
Rg R
v g RRA
R RvR R
−−= = ≈
+ +
The gain without feedback (−gmRL) is reducedby the presence of feedback.
sRfC
fR LR
ov
sv
inZ
outZ
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT16/26
CE with Shunt Feedback (II)
• Input impedance
The last term, which is usually dominant, shows that the input impedance is equalto Rf +RL divided by the open loop gain. Input impedance for the shunt feedbackamplifier has less variation over frequency and process than open-loop amplifier.
• Output impedance
• Feedback results in the reduction of the role the transistorplays in determining the gain and therefore improves linearity,but the presence of Rf may degrade the noise depending on thechoice of value for this resistor.
( )( ) || ||1
f L f L f Lin f
f L m L m L m L
Z R R R R R RZ R Z
R R Z g R g R g Rπ
ππ
+ + += ≈ ≈
+ + +
( ) ( )1 || ||11 || ||
f fout
m s fs f m
f
R RZ
g R R ZR R Z g
Rπ
π
= ≈ +
+ −
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT17/26
Example
2.5 pF2 V
3 V
LR
sRfR
12-GHz fT transistorscurrents about 5 mA
ov
svInput matching
Sample plots using shunt feedback
22
20
18
16
14
12
10100 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500
Gain
Noise figure
OIP3
IIP3
2
0
2−
4−
6−
8−
10−
3
2.5
2
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
IIP3(dBm)
NF(dB)
RfG
ain
(dB
), O
IP3
(dB
m)
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT18/26
CE w/ Shunt Feedback and CC Output Buffer
• CE with an output tends to make for a better match.
• With an output buffer, the voltage gain isno longer affected by the feedback, so it is approximately thatof a CE amplifier given by [RL /(RE + 1/gm )] minus the loss inthe buffer.
fC fR
LR
CCV CCV
biasI
ER
inV
outVC
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT19/26
Classical Two-port Noise Theory (I)
• Use these equivalences, the expression for noise factor can bewritten purely in terms of impedances and admittances:
NoisyTwo-portsY
si sYsi
ne
niNoiselessTwo-port
22
2s n s n
s
i i Y eF
i
+ += n c ui i i= + c c ni Y e=
( ) 2 22 2 2
2 21s u c s n u c s n
s s
i i Y Y e i Y Y eF
i i
+ + + + += = +
where
2
4n
n
eR
kTB≡
2
4u
u
iG
kTB≡
2
4s
s
iG
kTB≡
( ) ( )2 22
1 1u c s c s nu c s n
s s
G G G B B RG Y Y RF
G G
+ + + ++ + = + = +
, ,and
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT20/26
Classical Two-port Noise Theory (II)
• Optimum source admittance:
s c optB B B= − = 2us c opt
n
GG G G
R= + =and
2min 1 2 1 2 u
n opt c n c cn
GF R G G R G G
R
= + + = + + +
( ) ( )2 2
minn
s opt s opts
RF F G G B B
G = + − + −
GA circles
NF circles
Inputmatching
OutputmatchingAmplifier
sΓ LΓ0Z
0Z
inΓ outΓoutZ
inZ
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT
Min. noise figure, min ,, s optNF Γ
Max. available power gain, s in∗Γ = Γ
21/26
Input Matching of LNAs for Low Noise
• Many methods for matching the input using passive circuitelements are with varying bandwidth and complexity.
• Use two inductors to provide the power and noise match forthe LNA, the input impedance is (assume Miller effect is not importantand that r
πis not significant at the frequency of interest)
• To be matched:
, therefore
If Miller effect is considered, the capacitancewill be larger than C
π, and a larger inductor
will be required to perform the match. Also, theimaginary part of the input impedance mustequal zero. Therefore,
inRFbL
1Q
eLC
m es
g LR
Cπ
= se
m
R CL
gπ=
2
1 sb
m
R CL
C gπ
πω= −
m ein e b
g LjZ j L j L
C Cπ π
ω ωω−= + + +
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT22/26
NF and Bias Current (I)
• Noise due to the base resistance is in series with the inputvoltage, so it sees the full amplifier gain. The output noise dueto base resistance is given by
Note that this noise voltage is proportional to the collector current, as is the signal,so the SNR is independent of bias current.
• Collector shot noise is in parallel with collector signal currentand is directly sent to the output load resistor:
Note that this output voltage is proportional to the square root of the collectorcurrent, and therefore, to improve the noise figure due to collector shot noise, weincrease the current.
, 14bno r b m Lv kTr g R≈ ⋅
, 2Cno I C Lv qI R≈ ⋅
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT23/26
NF and Bias Current (II)
• Base shot noise can be converted to input voltage. If Zeq is theimpedance on the base (formed by a combination of matching,base resistance, source resistance, and transistor inputimpedance), then
Note that this output voltage is proportional to the collector current raised to thepower of 3/2. Therefore, to improve the noise figure due to base shot noise, wedecrease the current.
• At low currents, collector shot noise will dominate and noisefigure will improve with increasing current. However, theeffect of base shot noise also increases and will eventuallydominate. Thus, there will be some optimum level to whichthe collector current can be increased, beyond which the noisefigure will start to degrade again.
,
2B
Cno I eq m L
qIv Z g R
β≈ ⋅
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT24/26
Effect of the Cascode on NF
• The cascode transistor is a CBamplifier with current gain close to 1.The cascode transistor is forced to passthe current of the driver on to theoutput. This includes signal and noisecurrent. Thus, to a first order, thecascode can have no effect on the noisefigure of the amplifier. In reality it willadd some noise, the cascode LNA cannever be as low noise as a CE amplifier.
CCV
EEV
1br
iv
1cv2ei
2ci outv
2br
CR
cbiasv
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT25/26
Summary
• For three transistor amplifier configurations, the CE amplifierhas higher gain but poor frequency response than CB and CCamplifiers due to miller effects.
• Cascode configuration of CE and CB has the advantages ofimproving frequency response and a little impact on noisefigure.
• Feedback topologies are usually used to improve linearity withsacrificing some power gain and noise performance.
• Using two inductors (one at emitter and the other at base) toprovide the power and noise match is a common andconvenient matching strategy for the LNA design.
Department of Electronic Engineering, NTUT26/26