PHP UK 2017 - Don't Lose Sleep - Secure Your REST

Post on 23-Feb-2017

55 views 0 download

Transcript of PHP UK 2017 - Don't Lose Sleep - Secure Your REST

@adam_englander

Don’t Lose Sleep Secure Your REST

Adam Englander, iovation

@adam_englander

A Little Background About Me And APIs

@adam_englander

This is what I looked like when I started working on APIs

It was so long ago that SOAP was the new hotness.

@adam_englander

Over The Years• 2001 — Global Authentication Service API

• 2008 — Loan Application Ping Tree

• 2010 — Loan Management System API

• 2012 — Advertising Network API

• 2013 — Real Time Loan Risk Assessment API

• 2015 — Decentralized Multi-Factor Authorization API

@adam_englander

Some Were More Secure Than Others

@adam_englander

Auth and Crypto Was Messy• Auth as part of the message added complexity

• Auth outside of the message lost context

• Every implementation was specialized

• Crypto was non-standard and static

• Non-experts had to write a lot of code

@adam_englander

2015 Changed All Of ThatIETF RFC 7523: JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile

for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants

@adam_englander

Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE) Went Mainstream

@adam_englander

Why Was It A Big Deal?

• Authentication, authorization, encryption, and data integrity validation are not tied to the protocol

• OAuth, OpenID, and FIDO adopting the standard gave it credibility, stability, and longevity as an IETF working group

@adam_englander

Case Study: iovation LaunchKeyTransformation of an Authorization API

@adam_englander

LaunchKey is a Multi-Factor Authentication and Authorization

Service

@adam_englander

LaunchKey API Version 1.xThe Before Time. The Long Long Ago…

@adam_englander

Data• RESTish Web API

• Query parameters for GET including encrypted data and signature

• Mostly form encoded requests for POST/PUT/DELETE

• JSON responses

@adam_englander

Credentials

• Silo credentials for entity types

• Random integers for identifiers

• Passwords sent in encrypted package

• Password rotation with old password expiring one hour after new password generated.

@adam_englander

Cryptography

• RSA OAEP encryption for most requests

• AES 256 CBC for large packages

• RSA SHA-256 signatures for portions

@adam_englander

Security• Replay prevention for requester ID and

timestamp

• Signature verification for password and timestamp

• Encrypted password and timestamp

• Rate limited by requester ID and subject

@adam_englander

The Good — Security

• The API was never compromised even though there has been a bug bounty for four years

• It passed multiple static and dynamic analyses from top security analysis firms

• No-one has ever been able to fabricate an authorization ever

@adam_englander

The Bad — Usability• Has its own way of doing things

• API is not uniform in data and encryption

• Security trumped RESTful

• Too many credentials to manage

• No proper credential rotation

@adam_englander

LaunchKey API v2.xAn almost awesome attempt at making a better API via open standards

@adam_englander

Enter JSON Web Token (JWT)

@adam_englander

What We Gained

• Began using an open standard for data security

• We added a private claim for as SHA-256 hash of the request body

• A more secure API request format

@adam_englander

What Was Missing• Still using custom and inconsistent encryption

• Did not increase the RESTful quality

• Did not sign the entire request

• Did not reduce the quantity of credentials

• Did not improve the response

@adam_englander

LaunchKey API v3.0A full blown JOSE secured REST API

@adam_englander

What Changed?• JWT with custom claims used to validate entire

request and critical portions of the response

• JWE to encrypt request and response

• JWA for future proofing cryptography

• JWK for credential rotation

• Removed password entirely

@adam_englander

The Good — Decoupling• Authentication, authorization, validation, encryption

and decryption was moved to middleware

• Controllers handled only HTTP/JSON which greatly reduced code complexity

• Better unit testing across the board

• Reduced development times for new functionality

@adam_englander

The Good — OSS Libraries

• We can test our API without requiring our own client SDK

• Client SDKs are less complex

• OSS contributions are actually possible

• Documentation complexity was reduced

@adam_englander

The Good — Uniformity Across APIs

• All APIs will be migrated to JOSE

• Different key implementations are possible

• Shared knowledge across vastly different teams

• Federated authentication is attainable

@adam_englander

The Good — Hierarchical Auth

• JWT inclusion of issuer, subject, and audience allows for a parent to provide credentials for action on a sibling with proper context.

• JWK allows for easy identification of credentials used

@adam_englander

The Bad• Some languages have minimal support for

algorithms and strengths

• Some languages have no support for JWE. We had to write our own minimal Objective-C implementation

• Some good documentation but a good working knowledge requires reading RFCs

@adam_englander

How Did We Do It?

@adam_englander

JOSE, JOSE, JOSE

@adam_englander

What is JOSE?• JavaScript Object Signing and Encryption encompasses:

• JSON Web Token (JWT)

• JSON Web Signature (JWS)

• JSON Web Encryption (JWE)

• JSON Web Algorithm (JWA)

• JSON Web Key (KWK)

@adam_englander

JSON Web Token (JWT)

• JWT is actually a JSON Web Signature (JWS) package with standardized payload in the form of Claims.

• Provides for credentials, nonce, timestamp, and duration

• Private claims can be added for extensibility

@adam_englander

JSON Web Signature (JWS)

JWS is comprised of three segments:

1. Header provides key information, signature algorithm, and optionally content metadata

2. Payload is the data to be signed

3. Signature of the header and payload

@adam_englander

JSON Web Encryption (JWE)

JSON Web Encryption contains five segments:

1. Header provides key management mode, key information, key encryption algorithm, content encryption algorithm, and optionally content metadata

2. Content Encryption Key (CEK) may contain generated symmetric keys used for encryption and HMAC that are encrypted using asymmetric key encryption

@adam_englander

JSON Web Encryption (JWE)

3. Initialization Vector for encrypting the payload

4. Encrypted payload

5. Authentication tag is an HMAC of the header, IV, and encrypted payload

@adam_englander

JSON Web Algorithm

• Standardized format for expressing encryption and signature algorithms.

• Used by JWE/JWS with “enc” and “alg” keys in the header.

@adam_englander

JSON Web Key

• Standardized format for expressing keys used for JWE and JWS.

• Provides for key identification.

• Used by JWE/JWS with number of keys in the header which are determined by the key type.

@adam_englander

How We Use JOSEJOSE Solved Every Problem We Had

@adam_englander

Request Example Representation

POST /service/v3/auths HTTP/1.1 Content-Type: application/jose Content-Length: 112 Authorization: IOV-JWT eyJhb.VuYyI6IkEy.OKOaw

eyJhbGciO.Ppd6dIAkG.71lYoW6jA.t-4rRH6GsoXt0.1DGC4k

@adam_englander

JWT Header Example

{ "kid": "09:f7:e0:2f:12:90:be:21:1d:a7:07:a2:66:f1:53:b3", "alg": "RS256", "typ": "JWT", "cty": "JWT"}

@adam_englander

Key Rotation• Key ID id provided in request and response

• Current and specific public keys are available via endpoint

• https://api.launchkey.com/public/v3/public-key/09:f7:e0:2f:12:90:be:21:1d:a7:07:a2:66:f1:53:b3

• https://api.launchkey.com/public/v3/public-key

@adam_englander

Key Rotation{ "kid": "09:f7:e0:2f:12:90:be:21:1d:a7:07:a2:66:f1:53:b3", "alg": "RS256", "typ": "JWT", "cty": "JWT"}

/v3/public-key/09:f7:e0:2f:12:90:be:21:1d:a7:07:a2:66:f1:53:b3

@adam_englander

Request Authorization• Single use JSON Web Token (JWT) in Authorization

header as Authorization scheme IOV-JWT

• RSA key signature

• Hierarchical ACL: Org -> Dir -> Service

• Token ID as nonce

• Private claims: request

@adam_englander

Private Request Claims• Method

• Path

• Body hash

• Body hash algorithm

• Query parameters

@adam_englander

JWT Request Claims Example{ "iss": "dir:fd57bffe-7391-47c4-94d0-a0ad4b6bc979", "sub": "svc:d2083969-b5aa-4753-909d-472ce2517fd1", "aud": "lka", "iat": 1234567890, "nbf": 1234567890, "exp": 1234567895, "jti": "bec95e07-cee2-4c77-b080-56a8b24b2e54", "request": { "meth": "POST", "path": "/service/v3/auths", "func": "S256", "hash": "66a045b452102c59d840ec097d59d9467e13a3f34f6494e539ffd32c1bb35f18" } }

@adam_englander

Hierarchical Credentials

… "iss": "dir:fd57bffe-7391-47c4-94d0-a0ad4b6bc979", "sub": "svc:d2083969-b5aa-4753-909d-472ce2517fd1", "aud": "lka", …

@adam_englander

Timestamp and Duration… "iat": 1487244120, "nbf": 1487244120, "exp": 1487244125, …

JWT hash stored until expiration to prevent replay attacks.

@adam_englander

Nonce

… "jti": "bec95e07-cee2-4c77-b080-56a8b24b2e54", …

@adam_englander

Request Validation

POST /service/v3/auths HTTP/1.1

… "request": { "meth": "POST", "path": "/service/v3/auths", "func": "S256", "hash": "66a045b452102c59d840e…" } …

@adam_englander

Response Authorization• Single use JSON Web Token (JWT) in custom

header X-IOV-JWT

• RSA key signature

• Hierarchical credentials

• Token ID nonce is echoed

• Private claims: response

@adam_englander

Private Response Claims• Status Code

• Cache-Control Header

• Location Header

• Body hash

• Body hash algorithm

@adam_englander

Response Example RepresentationHTTP/1.1 201 Created Content-Type: application/jose Content-Length: 112 Cache-Control: no-cache Location: /directory/v3/users/518f5d3e-7cdf-4ef1-… X-IOV-JWT: eyJhb.VuYyI6IkEy.OKOaw

eyJhbGciO.Ppd6dIAkG.71lYoW6jA.t-4rRH6GsoXt0.1DGC4k

@adam_englander

JWT Response Claims Example{ "iss": "lka", "sub": "svc:d2083969-b5aa-4753-909d-472ce2517fd1", "aud": "dir:fd57bffe-7391-47c4-94d0-a0ad4b6bc979", "iat": 1234567891, "nbf": 1234567891, "exp": 1234567896, "jti": "bec95e07-cee2-4c77-b080-56a8b24b2e54", "response": { "status": 201, "cache": "no-cache", "location": "/directory/v3/users/518f5d3e-7cdf-4ef1-…", "func": "S256", "hash": "66a045b452102c59d840ec097d59d9467e13a3f34f6494e539ffd32c1bb35f18" } }

@adam_englander

Hierarchical Credentials

… "iss": "lka", "sub": "svc:d2083969-b5aa-4753-909d-472ce2517fd1", "aud": "dir:fd57bffe-7391-47c4-94d0-a0ad4b6bc979", …

@adam_englander

Timestamp and Duration

… "iat": 1487244121, "nbf": 1487244121, "exp": 1487244126, …

@adam_englander

Nonce

… "jti": "bec95e07-cee2-4c77-b080-56a8b24b2e54", …

Nonce is echoed in JTI to allow for detection of Man In The Middle attacks

@adam_englander

Response ValidationHTTP/1.1 201 Created Cache-Control: no-cache Location: /directory/v3/users/518f5d3e-7c…

… "response": { "status": 201, "cache": "no-cache", "location": "/directory/v3/users/518f5d3e-7c…", "func": "S256", "hash": “66a045b452102c59d840ec097d59d9467e13…” } …

@adam_englander

Encrypted Data with JWE• JWK provides for key rotation

• Combination of RSA and AES encryption is always used

• Algorithms and modes are always the same

• Key size is variable in allowed range

• Response uses same AES key size as request

@adam_englander

JWE Header Example

{ "kid": "09:f7:e0:2f:12:90:be:21:1d:a7:07:a2:66:f1:53:b3", "alg": “RSA-OAEP-256", "enc": "A256CBC-HS512", "cty": “application/json"}

@adam_englander

Conclusion

• JOSE has made our secure API more secure

• JOSE has made our API easier to use

• JOSE has made our code less complex

• JOSE has homogenized auth and crypto across multiple platforms regardless of language

@adam_englander

Libraries

• spomky-labs/jose - Full JOSE

• lcobucci/jwt - JWT only - Author presenting tomorrow

@adam_englander

Please Rate This Talk

https://legacy.joind.in/20330

@adam_englander

If You Want To Follow Up

• @adam_englander

• adam.englander@iovation.com

• https://www.iovation.com/blog/author/aenglander