R.G. Bias | [email protected] |3
Standard Deviation
σ = SQRT(Σ(X - µ)2/N)
(Does that give you a headache?)
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |4
USA Today has come out with a new survey - apparently, three out of every four people make up 75% of the population. – David Letterman
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |5
Statistics: The only science that enables different experts using the same figures to draw different conclusions. – Evan Esar (1899 - 1995), US humorist
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |6
Scales The data we collect can be
represented on one of FOUR types of scales:– Nominal – Ordinal– Interval– Ratio
“Scale” in the sense that an individual score is placed at some point along a continuum.
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |7
Nominal Scale Describe something by giving it a name.
(Name – Nominal. Get it?) Mutually exclusive categories. For example:
– Gender: 1 = Female, 2 = Male– Marital status: 1 = single, 2 = married,
3 = divorced, 4 = widowed
– Make of car: 1 = Ford, 2 = Chevy . . . The numbers are just names.
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |8
Ordinal Scale An ordered set of objects. But no implication about the relative
SIZE of the steps. Example:
– The 50 states in order of population: • 1 = California• 2 = Texas• 3 = New York • . . . 50 = Wyoming
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |9
Interval Scale Ordered, like an ordinal scale. Plus there are equal intervals between
each pair of scores. With Interval data, we can calculate
means (averages). However, the zero point is arbitrary. Examples:
– Temperature in Fahrenheit or Centigrade.– IQ scores
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |10
Ratio Scale Interval scale, plus an absolute zero. Sample:
– Distance, weight, height, time (but not years – e.g., the year 2002 isn’t “twice” 1001).
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |11
Scales (cont’d.)It’s possible to measure the same attribute
on different scales. Say, for instance, your midterm test. I could:
Give you a “1” if you don’t finish, and a “2” if you finish.
“1” for highest grade in class, “2” for second highest grade, . . . .
“1” for first quarter of the class, “2” for second quarter of the class,” . . .
Raw test score (100, 99, . . . .).– (NOTE: A score of 100 doesn’t mean the
person “knows” twice as much as a person who scores 50, he/she just gets twice the score.)
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |12
Scales (cont’d.)Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio
Name = = =
Mutually-exclusive
= = =
Ordered = =
Equal interval =+ abs. 0
Gender, Yes/No
Class rank, Survey ans.
Days of wk., Temp.
Inches, Dollars
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |13
Earlier . . . We learned about frequency
distributions. I asserted that a frequency
distribution, and/or a histogram (a graphical representation of a frequency distribution), was a good way to summarize a collection of data.
There’s another, even shorter-hand way.
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |14
Measures of Central Tendency Mode
– Most frequent score (or scores – a distribution can have multiple modes)
Median– “Middle score”– 50th percentile
Mean - µ (“mu”)– “Arithmetic average”– ΣX/N
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |15
More quiz questions about measures of central
tendency4 – True or false: In a normal distribution (bell curve), the mode, median, and mean are all the same? __True __False
5 – (This one is tricky.) If the mode=mean=median, then the distribution is necessarily a bell curve?
__True __False
6 – I have a distribution of 10 scores. There was an error, and really the highest score is 5 points HIGHER than previously thought.a) What does this do to the mode?
__ Increases it __Decreases it __Nothing __Can’t tellb) What does this do to the median?
__ Increases it __Decreases it __Nothing __Can’t tellc) What does this do to the mean?
__ Increases it __Decreases it __Nothing __Can’t tell
7 – Which of the following must be an actual score from the distribution?a) Meanb) Medianc) Moded) None of the above
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |16
OK, so which do we use? Means allow further arithmetic/statistical manipulation.
But . . . It depends on:
– The type of scale of your data• Can’t use means with nominal or ordinal scale data• With nominal data, must use mode
– The distribution of your data• Tend to use medians with distributions bounded at
one end but not the other (e.g., salary). – The question you want to answer
• “Most popular score” vs. “middle score” vs. “middle of the see-saw”
• “Statistics can tell us which measures are technically correct. It cannot tell us which are ‘meaningful’” (Tal, 2001, p. 52).
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |17
Mean – “see saw” (from Tal, 2001)
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |18
Have sidled up to SHAPES of distributions
Symmetrical Skewed – positive and negative Flat
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |19
“Pulling up the mean”
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |20
Why . . . . . . isn’t a “measure of central
tendency” all we need to characterize a distribution of scores/numbers/data/stuff?
“The price for using measures of central tendency is loss of information” (Tal, 2001, p. 49).
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |21
Didja hear the one about . . .
the Aggies who were on a march and came to a river? The Aggie captain asked the farmer how deep the river was.”
“Oh, it averages two feet deep.” All the Aggies drowned.
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |22
Note . . . We started with a bunch of specific
scores. We put them in order. We drew their distribution. Now we can report their central tendency. So, we’ve moved AWAY from specifics, to
a summary. But with Central Tendency, alone, we’ve ignored the specifics altogether.– Note MANY distributions could have a
particular central tendency! If we went back to ALL the specifics, we’d
be back at square one.
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |23
Measures of Dispersion Range Semi-interquartile range Standard deviation
– σ (sigma)
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |24
Range Highest score minus the lowest score. Like the mode . . .
– Easy to calculate– Potentially misleading– Doesn’t take EVERY score into account.
What we need to do is calculate one number that will capture HOW spread out our numbers are from that measure of Central Tendency.– ‘Cause MANY different distributions of scores
can have the same central tendency!– “Standard Deviation” -- σ = SQRT(Σ(X -
µ)2/N)
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |25
Let’s do a short example
What if I asked four undergraduates how many cars they’ve owned in their lives and I got the following answers: 1 1 1 1
There would be NO variance. σ = 0. But what if the answers were 0 0 1 3What’s the mode? Median? Mean? Go with mean. So, how much do the actual scores
deviate from the mean?
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |26
So . . . Add up all the deviations and we
should have a feel for how disperse, how spread, how deviant, our distribution is.
Let’s calculate the Standard Deviation.
As always, start inside the parentheses.
Σ(X - µ)
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |27
Standard Deviation
Score (X) Mean (µ) X-µ
0 1 -1
0 1 -1
1 1 0
3 1 2
Total 0 (damn)
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |29
Damn! (cont’d.) OK, let’s try it on
a smaller set of numbers.
X X - µ2 -23 -15 16 2
Σ = 16 Σ = 0µ = 4 Hmm.
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |30
OK . . . . . . so mathematicians at this point
do one of two things. Take the absolute value or square
‘em. We square ‘em. Σ(X - µ)2
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |32
Standard Deviation (cont’d.)
Then take the average of the squared deviations. Σ(X - µ)2/N– Remember, dividing by N was the way
we took the average of the original scores.
– 10/4 = 2.5. But this number is so BIG!
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |33
OK . . . . . . take the square root (to make up
for squaring the deviations earlier). σ = SQRT(Σ(X - µ)2/N) SQRT(2.5) = 1.58 Now this doesn’t give you a
headache, right? I said “right”?
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |35
We need . . . A measure of spread that is NOT
sensitive to every little score, just as median is not.
SIQR: Semi-interquartile range. (Q3 – Q1)/2
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |36
To summarizeMode Range -Easy to calculate.
-May be misleading.
Median SIQR -Capture the center.-Not influenced by extreme scores.
Mean(µ)
SD(σ)
-Take every score into account. -Allow later manipulations.
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |37
Practice Problems I’ll send you some, tonight.
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |38
http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/0072494468/student_view0/statistics_primer.html
Click on Statistics Primer.
R.G. Bias | [email protected] |
References Hinton, P. R. Statistics explained. Shaughnessy, Zechmeister, and
Zechmeister. Experimental methods in psychology.
39
Top Related