MWSP III (LAIBAN DAM PROJECT)MWSP III (LAIBAN DAM PROJECT)MWSP III (LAIBAN DAM PROJECT)MWSP III (LAIBAN DAM PROJECT)27 October 2009
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Project Background
– MWSSP III, Laiban Dam, Other Water Sources
• Current Water Situation in Metro Manila
– Demand Supply Gap, Angat Dam, the NEED for Laiban
• The Laiban Dam Project Proposal
– Technical Description– Technical Description
• Design Considerations, Facilities
– Project Activity Schedule
– Implementation Framework
– LARP
– Environment Assessment
– PROJECT COST
MWSP III IDENTIFIED
WATER SOURCES
Marikina River Basin
Kaliwa Basin
Kanan Basin
Umiray Basin
Laguna Bay
Taal LakeTaal Lake
Pampanga River
Calamba-Sta.Rosa
Groundwater
Marikina Groundwater
MWSP III PROJECT SELECTION
SOURCE YIELD (MLD)
Remarks
Kaliwa River (Laiban Dam) 1,909 Most economic source (1987)
Marikina River 1,280 Socially unacceptable (1987)
Kanan River 3,170 Only after Kaliwa (transbasin)
Umiray River
(UATP to Angat)
777 Implemented 1998, to undergo rehab,
additional source (190 MLD)
Laguna Bay (entire lake) 2,592 Pollution control measures before exploitation
for water supply
Laguna Bay (eastern portion only) 1,782 Requires 1.95 m dike in the bay (1992)
Pampanga River 2,592 Pumping cost energy relatively high
Taal Lake 864 Not recommended due volcanic hazard
Calamba-Sta. Rosa Groundwater 190 For local supply only
Lower Marikina Groundwater 130 For local supply only
ANGAT DAM
UMIRAY Transbasin
STUDY ON WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT FOR
METRO MANILA (JICA, 2003)
Kanan Dam No. 1Kanan Dam No. 1
Kanan Low DamKanan Low Dam
Laiban High DamLaiban High Dam
Laiban Low DamLaiban Low DamKaliwa Low DamKaliwa Low Dam
Agos DamAgos Dam
Source Combination
Scheme Capacity (MLD)
Stage 1 Stage 2 Total
1 Laiban Dam+Kanan No. 2 Dam 1,803 3,310 5,110
2 Kaliwa Low Dam + Agos Dam (550)/0 3,000 3,000
Water Sources for Metro MANILA
Estimated Yields (Capacities)
2 Kaliwa Low Dam + Agos Dam (550)/0 3,000 3,000
3 Agos Dam Alone 1,500 1,500 3,000
4 Laiban Dam + Agos 1,830 1,500 3,330
5 Kaliwa Low Dam + Kanan No. 2 Dam
(550)/290 3,310 3,600
*based on Nippon-Koie/NJS Study, 2003
No Source Combination Stage 1
Cost
US $M
Capacity
MLD
Stage 1
Commis-sioning Date
1 Laiban Dam+Kanan No. 2 Dam 804 1,830 2015
Stage 1 Cost and Commissioning Dates, Water
Sources for Metro MANILA
2 Kaliwa Low Dam + Agos Dam 529 550 2012
3 Agos Dam Alone 1,071 1,500 2017
4 Laiban Dam + Agos 807 1,830 2015
5 Kaliwa Low Dam + Kanan No. 2 Dam
529 550 2012
*based on Nippon-Koie/NJS Study, updated to 2005 prices by SKM
The 2005 MWSS StudyThe 2005 MWSS StudyThe 2005 MWSS StudyThe 2005 MWSS Study
• “the Laiban Dam + Kanan Dam has until now beenrecommended to be the priority combination amongoptions already studied due to the higher yield, lowest unitdevelopment cost and higher elevation”
• Considerable works have been done for Laiban Dam• Considerable works have been done for Laiban Dam
– FS conducted in 1979
– DE done in 1980
– Construction of diversion tunnel completed in 1984
– Plan was reviewed, updated in 1997, 2000, 2007
– The original plan from the headworks to the water treatment plant remain unchanged
PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE –––––––– LAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMPROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE PROJECT PROFILE –––––––– LAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAMLAIBAN DAM
� The Project is a multi-purpose development: itwill provide a water supply of 1,950 MLD; it willalso provide a 25MWhydropower plant.
� It will become the second major source ofwater supply for Metro Manila, after Angat Dam.
� A 113-meter high dam will be constructed to
� The Project is a multi-purpose development: itwill provide a water supply of 1,950 MLD; it willalso provide a 25MWhydropower plant.
� It will become the second major source ofwater supply for Metro Manila, after Angat Dam.
� A 113-meter high dam will be constructed to� A 113-meter high dam will be constructed toutilize the Kaliwa River Basin in Tanay, Rizal.
� Kaliwa River basin is situated east of MetroManila and drains a mountainous watershed ofabout 28,000 hectares on the slope of SierraMadreMountains.
� A 113-meter high dam will be constructed toutilize the Kaliwa River Basin in Tanay, Rizal.
� Kaliwa River basin is situated east of MetroManila and drains a mountainous watershed ofabout 28,000 hectares on the slope of SierraMadreMountains.
6000
8000
10000
12000
M L D
300 MLD
MSW III-3(650)KANAN (3200)
MWWS Demand-Supply Projections (2000)
0
2000
4000
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
Year
M L D
UATP (800)MSW III-1(650)
MSW III-2(650)
MWSP III, Agos River Pre-FS, 2000
•• CoversCovers thethe NCRNCR ((1717 townstowns andand
cities)cities);; 55 inin RizalRizal andand 66 inin CaviteCavite
•• TotalTotal ServiceService AreaArea ofof 11,,940940 sqsq kmkm
•• 11,,400400--MWCIMWCI
•• 540540--MWSIMWSI
•• PopulationPopulation inin thethe ServiceService Area,Area, 1414
MillionMillion
MWSSMWSSMWSSMWSSMWSSMWSSMWSSMWSS
MillionMillion
•• ServedServed PopulationPopulation ofof aboutabout 99
MillionMillion
•• AngatAngat RiverRiver 33,,200200MLDMLD
•• UmirayUmiray 800800MLDMLD
•• SumSum--agag 190190MLDMLD
•• GroundwaterGroundwater 9090MLDMLD
UMIRAY RIVER ANGAT
RESERVOIR
IPO DAM
LA MESA TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 1
LA MESA TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2
BIGTI
SETTLINGBASIN
9 CMS
70 CMS
46 CMS
MWSS Existing
Water
Supply
SystemN I A
3 Tunnels
5 Aqueducts
4,480 MLD4,000 MLD (UMIRAY, (UMIRAY,
ANGAT, IPO)ANGAT, IPO)
900 MLD 900 MLD
CAPACITYCAPACITY
)
PLANT NO. 1
BALARA TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2
BALARA TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 1
SAN JUAN
RESERVOIR
LA MESA
RESERVOIR
BAGBAG
RESERVOIR
TO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMTO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
1,500 MLD 1,500 MLD
CAPACITYCAPACITY
470 MLD 470 MLD
CAPACITYCAPACITY
1,130 MLD 1,130 MLD
CAPACITYCAPACITY
380 MLD, La Mesa
IPO DAM
ANGAT DAM
BUSTOS DAM
(NIA)
28,000-30,000 has
releases thru auxiliary turbinesreleases thru
main turbinesANGAT DAM
DIKESPILLWAY
direc
tion o
f flow
Inflow from Umiray Angat Transbasin Tunnel
IPO DAM
BICTI STILLING BASIN
3 tunnels
LA MESA DAM
6 aqueducts
La Mesa Treatment Plants 1 & 2
BalaraTreatment Plants 1 & 2
IPO DAM
MWSS ProjectionsJICA STUDY, 2001
MWSS DEMANDMWSS DEMANDMWSS DEMANDMWSS DEMANDMWSS DEMANDMWSS DEMANDMWSS DEMANDMWSS DEMAND--------SUPPLY SITUATIONSUPPLY SITUATIONSUPPLY SITUATIONSUPPLY SITUATIONSUPPLY SITUATIONSUPPLY SITUATIONSUPPLY SITUATIONSUPPLY SITUATION
Latest Water Demand UpdateLatest Water Demand Update6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000Projected Demand (MLD)
Angat Dam + GW sourcesAngat Dam + GW sources
Umiray TransbasinUmiray Transbasin
MWSS Projections
SumSum--ag River Sourceag River Source
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
Year
Projected Demand (MLD)
MWSS Demand Variations
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 00
Time
ADD Ratio
2008 14.578 Million
2010 14.894 Million
2015 15.937 Million
2020 16.962 Million
2025 18.001 Million
MWSS FRANCHISE AREA
TOTAL POPULATION*
* Based on NSO projections
Service Population Water Production (MLD) 20071
(sq.km) Served (M) Billed Volume NRW Total
MWSI (West) 540 8.1 780.33 1,513.04 2,293.37
MWCI (East) 1,400 5.3 1,023.81 354.16 1,377.97
TOTAL 1,940 13.4 1,804.14 1,867.20 3,671.34
* Based on NSO projections
1MWSS’ service Quarterly Service Performance Information (QSPI). Figures based on plant production
and do not reflect conveyance losses through Angat, Ipo and eventually to the WTP’s.
Main Dike
Angat Dam
Spillway
NPC’s Report, 1988
The JICA Study, 1989
EDCOP’s/T&TI’s Dam Safety
Review, 2001
MWSS’ Engineering and Geological
Report on Angat
MWSS’ Dam and Dike Safety
PAST WORKS RELATED PAST WORKS RELATED
TO THE ANGAT HYDRO TO THE ANGAT HYDRO
PLANT SAFETYPLANT SAFETY
Ipo Dam
Evaluation, 2002 (NZ assisted)
PHIVOLCS/USGS Joint Study, 2000
Based on the USBR’s SEED Criteria,both the Angat Dam and Main Dikeare rated CONDITIONALLY
POOR*
** AA potentiallypotentially damdam safetysafety deficiencydeficiency isis recognizedrecognized forfor unusualunusual loadingloading conditions,conditions, whichwhich maymayrealisticallyrealistically occuroccur duringduring thethe expectedexpected lifelife ofof thethe structurestructure.. CONDITIONALLYCONDITIONALLY POORPOOR maymay alsoalsobebe usedused whenwhen uncertaintiesuncertainties existexist asas toto criticalcritical analysisanalysis parameters,parameters, whichwhich identifyidentify aa potentialpotentialdamdam safetysafety deficiencydeficiency;; furtherfurther investigationsinvestigations andand studiesstudies areare necessarynecessary..
ORIGINAL PROJECT DESIGN (1983)
• Headworks
– LAIBAN Dam (113 meters; MaxWL=270 m; MinWL=237 m: Max
Q = 4,885 CMS, Bottom Outlet, Elev ±187, 300 CMS)
– Twin multi-level intakes; one-intake for Kanan
– 3.2 dia, 7.8 km tunnel, concrete-lined
– 3.2 dia.,4.0 km tunnel, steel pipeline– 3.2 dia.,4.0 km tunnel, steel pipeline
– 2.7 m dia., 1.8 km steel-lined tunnel (with surge shaft and
adit leading to powerplant
• Hydropower Station (30 MW)
– With by-pass to Pantay Creek to Laguna Lake (Morong)
• Treatment works
– 3 phase development (800 MLD), 2 CWR’s 50 ML
ORIGINAL PROJECT DESIGN (1983) -contd
• Distribution System
– Waterways from Pantay Treatment Plant to Cogeo
Reservoir (3.2 m dia x 1.2 km pressure pipeline, 3.6 m dia x
6.9 km of concrete-lined tunnel)
– Service reservoirs at Cogeo, Phase 1-120 ML, and 60 ML at
CapitolCapitol
– Pressure control station at Mayamot
– Pumping station at La Mesa, 160 MLD for higher north
– 44 km of 2,000 to 2,600 mm dia trunk mains from Cogeo to
south and La Mesa pumping station
– ± 158 km pipelines, 300 to 1,500 mm dia, and secondary
distribution including 583,000 service connections – all
phases
2006 Estimated Project Cost (MWSS Study)
Project Components Cost (Php M)Headworks (dams, tunnels etc.) 13,060.00
Treatment Plant 3,254.00
Distribution System 9,951.00
Environmental & Watershed
Management
90.00
Management
Resettlement 7,417.00
Right-of-way 2,651.00
Indirect Costs (Eng’g., Taxes,
Contingencies, etc)
64.00
IDC and front-end fee 5,560.00
TOTAL 47,928.00
MWSS Total Expenditures To Date for LAIBAN DAM
Description Amt (Php M)
� Before MWSS Privatization:
(FS, Detailed Engg., Diversion tunnels, partial
land acquisition, and other pre-construction
activities)
690.00
� After MWSS Privatization: 65.00� After MWSS Privatization:
a) (Review/Updating of documents including
preliminary resettlement planning), year 2001 -
-------------------------------------------------- 36.00M
b) Technical review & assess tender docs for
construction, year 2006-2007 ---------- 24.00M
c) Further geological investigation at damsite
(on-going) -------------------------------------5.00M
65.00
TOTAL 755.00
LAIBAN DAM – Technical Considerations
• Dam Design – compliant to ICOLD standards,
also referred to USBR and US Corps of Eng’rs
– Philippine Fault (Infanta segment; Digdig &
Bondoc Peninsula)
– West Valley Fault (Marikina Fault)– West Valley Fault (Marikina Fault)
– Slopes of the dam is at 1.5:1, just like that of Angat
Main Dam
– Concrete Faced Rock-filled Dam (CFRD)
– Dam designed to withstand extreme events (PMF,
MCE)
LAIBAN DAM – Technical Considerations
• Tunnels and Waterways Design
– Tunnels (3 segments, 14.65 km, Tunnels 1 and 2
follow original alignments)
– Pipeline (or Tunnel ??) expected to cross the West
Valley FaultValley Fault
– Geology dictates whether conventional “drill and
blast” or use of TBM would be practicable in
specific tunnel sections; also the need for lining.
– Tunneling activity is in the “critical path”
Case 1
M = 8.0
R = 20 km
PGA = 0.41 g
PGAR = 0.25 g
Source: JICA Study, 2003
Case 2
M = 8.2
R = 20 km
PGA = 0.43 g
PGAR = 0.26 g
LAIBAN DAM – Technical Considerations(Reservoir Area – Limestone Formation)
• “Based on the results of the geologic mapping, majority of the
limestone bodies investigated within the reservoir area may
not have major impact/s on the designated reservoir water
level of 270 masl except the one located along the bank oflevel of 270 masl except the one located along the bank of
Lenatin River which is about 1 km upstream of the proposed
dam site.” - Geotechnical Investigation for Laiban Dam Project
(Laiban Dam Limestone Project, April 2008)
• “Considering the size of the dam’s catchment area, it is very
unlikely that the water that is lost will find itself exiting into
another drainage basin. It is possible that the water flows
back into the river farther downstream.” - EDCOP/BERGS
Geological Report, November 2008
• Dam and Headworks
– 113 meter high dam, CFRD
– Twin Intakes (Laiban + Kanan)
– Reservoir and Watershed
– Access Roads
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – Facilities
– Access Roads
– 22.5 CMS (1,950 MLD) flow
– Operating levels (max. 270 m; min. 235 m)
– PMF, 3,702 CMS
– Seismic consideration, 0.4 g PGA
• Raw Water Conveyance
– Tunnel 1, 7.8 km total
• 3.2 m dia concrete-lined section, 7.5 km
• 2.7 m dia steel-lined section, 300 meters
– Pipeline 1, 4.0 km, 3.2 m dia.
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – Facilities
– Tunnel 2, 1.8 km, 2.7 m dia., steel-lined
• With headrace and surge tank
• Pantay Hydropower Plant
– 25 MW Capacity, 2 x 12.5 MW Francis Turbines (by-pass provided)
• Water Treatment Plant– Conventional Treatment facility
– 2,400 MLD capacity
• Treated Water Conveyance Facilities– Pipeline No. 2, 5 km, 3.2 m dia.
– Tunnel No. 3, 5 km, 3.6 m dia.
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – Facilities
– Tunnel No. 3, 5 km, 3.6 m dia.
• Storage Facilities, Pump Station, Pressure Control Station– Antipolo Reservor, 20 ML
– Taytay Reservoir, 120 ML
– Antipolo Pumping Station, 110 MLD capacity
– Taytay Pressure Control Station
• Trunk Mains, River Crossings and Off-take
Points
– Trunk Main from Taytay to Pasig, along Ortigas
Extension to Dr. Sixto Antonio Drive, 11.8 km,
2.2m dia
– 1 river crossing, Marikina River
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – Facilities
– 1 river crossing, Marikina River
– Trunk Main from Taytay to SLEX, through C-5/C-6
alignments, 14.5 km, 3.2 m dia
– 4 river crossings – Marikina River, Antipolo,
Pasig, Taguig
– 4 Measurement Points
PROJECT FACILTIES
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT
PANTAY WTP2400 MLD Cap.
ANTIPOLO 20 MLD RESERVOIR & 111 MLD cap.
PUMPING STATION
PANTAY POWER HOUSE 25 MW Francis Turbines
INTAKE STRUCTURES
HEP
P
PUMPING STATION
TAYTAY PRESSURE CONTROL STATION
TAYTAY120 MLD RESERVOIR
PASIG
SLEX
metering point
metering points
• Project Costs to be updated to reflect:
– Current materials, labor and equipment costs
– Contractual arrangements (EPC)
– CPI’s
– Available, verified and validated quantities –
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – PROJECT COST
– Available, verified and validated quantities –especially for major work items
• Derived and/or updated unit costs are to be compared with existing, valid and actual construction costs in various on-going jobs in the Philippines as well as in similar, overseas projects
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT
PROJECT COST COMPONENTS
CONSTRUCTION (DIRECT) COST
LARP
ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL
INDIRECT COST (engineering,
supervision, management &
administration, contingencies)
TAXES AND DUTIES
Past Works Total Cost LARP Design Q Power
Original, 1983,
Electrowatt, Renardet
P 10.5 B
(USD 400 M)
257 families
(P 990 M)
22 CMS
(1,900 MLD)
30 MW
(1 unit)
Electrowatt,Renardet, P 21.93 B 3,000 families 22 CMS 30 MW
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT
Comparative Features & Costs
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT
Comparative Features & Costs
Electrowatt,Renardet,
1997
P 21.93 B
(USD 828 M)
3,000 families
(P 3,304 M)
22 CMS
(1,900 MLD)
30 MW
(2-15 MW)
GHD, Renardet, ISSI,
PERTCONSUL, 2000
P 31.91 B
(USD 747 M)
+3,000 families
(P 4,502 M)
22 CMS
(1,900 MLD)
30 MW
(2-15 MW)
Daruma, Norconsult
2007
P 47.55 B
(USD 951 M)
4,413 families
(P 15,170 M)
21 CMS
(1,814 MLD)
25 MW
(2-12.5 MW)
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – SCHEDULE
PHASE 1Proposal
Preparation
PHASE 2Contract
Negotiation
PHASE 3Planning &
Organizing
project update
proposal preparation
proposal evaluation
negotiation
competitive challenge
organization of JV, project company
government approvals/permits
off-take agreement
PHASE 4
Construction
PHASE 5
Operations
award of projectoff-take agreement
financial closure
tendering
LARP, ROW, entry permits
EPC mobilization
construction activities
commissioning
post construction
operational and occupancy permits
operations – treated bulk water supply;
power supply
• Project to be implemented through the Corporate
Joint Venture scheme, EO 423, 30 April 2005, in
accordance with NEDA Guidelines on JV Agreements
• The Proponent
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – Implementation
Framework
• The Proponent
• JV Agreement between The Proponent and MWSS
• The JV Partners (Proponent and MWSS) shall
organize a Project Company
• ± 90% of the equity shares to be subscribed by the
Proponent, remaining ± 10% by MWSS
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT -LARP
• An instrument to mitigate adverse impacts caused by
dislocation, loss of houses, assets, livelihood and
social disintegration
• LARP addresses of both IP and non-IP families
• Further validation shall be done during the final • Further validation shall be done during the final
technical design phase of the project in order to
cover all issues that will be raised by affected
persons (AP’s) and affected families (AF’s)
• Important underlying principle – the quality of life
offered by LARP “with the project” should be equal or
better than “without the project”
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT -LARP Objective
To ensure just compensation and peaceful and effectiveresettlement of the households/families to be affected by theproject.
These include:
1. AFs whose land and properties will be directly1. AFs whose land and properties will be directlysubmerged by the dam;
2. AFswhowill be at “risk” with the operation of the dam;
3. AFs who will be affected by the construction of otherfacilities of the project like pipes and water treatmentplant (WTP) and
4. AFs in San Ysiro who will be affected by the relocation offamilies from Tanay, General Nakar and Antipolo.
AF = affected families
FLOW
KALIWA RIVER
DAMAREA OF WATERSHED = 28,000 HAS
DARAITAN
MADILAY-DILAY
Diversion Tunnel
KALIWA WATERSHED (28,000 has.)
FLOW
LIMUTAN RIVER LENATIN RIVER
INTAKE
CAYABU
STA. INES
TINUKAN
SAN ANDRES
MAMUYAO
LAIBAN
KUYAMBAY
STO.NIÑO
FLOODING OF 7 BGYS. IN TANAY AND 0NE IN GEN. NAKAR
BGY. STA. INESAF=474
BGY. MAMUYAOAF=323
BGY. STO. NINO
BGY. LIMUTANAF=390
PROJECT IMPACT
Source: DENR
BGY. CAYABUAF=175
BGY. STO. NINOAF=318
BGY. SAN ANDRESAF=423
BGY. LAIBANAF=720
BGY. TINUKANAF=290
BGY. DARAITAN591
Area
(hectares)
MWSS
Property
1,507
Proposed Resettlement Site in San Ysiro, Antipolo City as proclaimed underProclamation No. 2480Issued on Jan 26, 1986
Parcel 4
Parcel 1
Parcel 2Parcel 1 887
Parcel 2 360
Parcel 3 379
Parcel 4 1,291
Total 4,424
MWSS Titled PropertyLot 1 = 232 hectares
Lot 2 = 1,275 hectares
Total = 1,507 hectares
Parcel 2
Parcel 3
Affected Barangays Type of Impact/Recommended Action Proposed Measures to avoid/minimize impacts
(i) Tanay, Rizal • Proposed Dam Site
• Laiban • To be submerged/for relocation
• San Andres • To be submerged/for relocation
• Cayabu • To be submerged/for relocation
• Sto. Nino • To be submerged/for relocation
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – Affected Barangays, Impacts and
Mitigation Measures
• Sto. Nino relocation
• Tinucan • To be submerged/for relocation
• Mamuyao • To be submerged/for relocation
• Sta. Inez
• will not be submerged
• To be indirectly affected, will have access problem
Will not be included for relocation
Provide access to San Ysiro, the relocation site
• Daraitan
• will not be submerged
• Risk area incase of flooding and dam break, originally proposed for relocation
Will not be included for relocation
Installation of early warning mechanism and monitoring system to monitor status of dam during inclement weather
Affected Barangays Type of Impact/Recommended Action Proposed Measures to avoid/minimize impacts
(i) Gen. Nakar, Quezon
• within the Kaliwa Watershed
• will not be submerged, but will be indirectly
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – Affected Barangays, Impacts and
Mitigation Measures
• Lumutan
but will be indirectly affected Lack of access to resources/market)
• Existing road link is only through Brgy. Sta. Inez
• No existing road network to Gen. Nakar ( proposed for relocation)
Will not be included for relocation
Improve existing access to Sta Inez and then access to San Ysiro, the relocation site
(i) Antipolo, Rizal Proposed Water Treatment Plant (WTP )
• Barangay Pantay
Site of the treatment plant, families to be displaced ( proposed to be relocated )
Displacement of • Minimal movement of existing
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – Affected Barangays, Impacts and
Mitigation Measures
• San Ysiro
Displacement of current settlers, loss of access to farm production and losses on structures, and crops/trees, if movement is done on current land use and properties and assets
• Minimal movement of existing structures/properties
• Identify sites that are not occupied by current settlers within the 4,440 hectares to be used for resettlement and facilities to be established based on the physical development plan that will be prepared.
Project Affected Families (updated)
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – LARP
Proposed Resettlement Package and Compensation
• OPTION 1 – Outright compensation for AP’s/AF’s
• OPTION 2 – Resettlement Assistance of:
– 30 sq meter house, single detached– 30 sq meter house, single detached
– 240 sq meter home lot
– 5,000 sq meter farm lot
– Compensation for lots, structures, fruit and
permanent trees
– Other assistance packages on livelihood,
employment, capacity building
• Land Acquisition Cost/Compensation
– Farm & home lots, structures, permanent trees,
fruit trees
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT
LARP Budget Components
fruit trees
• Resettlement Cost (San Ysiro)
– Development cost, housing units, community
facilities, etc.
• Other Costs & Contingencies
– Training, services
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT LAIBAN DAM PROJECT -- EIAEIADENR RequirementsDENR Requirements
• ECC Amendment
• Environmental Performance Report and • Environmental Performance Report and
Management Plan
• Environmental Impact Statement
-- Environmental Compliance CertificateEnvironmental Compliance CertificateECC issued by NEPC – August 18, 1986
ConditionCondition ParticularsParticulars
11 Implementation of biological controls against malaria and other insect Implementation of biological controls against malaria and other insect
related diseases in the project area related diseases in the project area
22 Implementation of epidemiological monitoring planImplementation of epidemiological monitoring plan
33 Establishment of microEstablishment of micro--seismic monitoring centersseismic monitoring centers
44 Implementation of submitted resettlement plan and commitmentsImplementation of submitted resettlement plan and commitments
55 Provision of assistance to displaced minorities in terms of livelihood Provision of assistance to displaced minorities in terms of livelihood
opportunitiesopportunities
66 Conformance with Alternative 3 relative to sludge disposalConformance with Alternative 3 relative to sludge disposal
77 Formulation and establishment of contingency plans and warning systemFormulation and establishment of contingency plans and warning system
88 Implementation of measures to minimize soil erosion of the quarried Implementation of measures to minimize soil erosion of the quarried
areas and riverbanksareas and riverbanks
99 Mitigating measures on air, water and noise pollution.Mitigating measures on air, water and noise pollution.
• Conduct of EIS
• Site Scoping, Public Consultations, Public
Hearing
– Land use, flora & fauna, reservoir & watershed,
geology & hydrogeology, hydrology, air, noise, etc.
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT – Environmental
geology & hydrogeology, hydrology, air, noise, etc.
• Environmental Impact Sampling & Study
• ECC Application & DENR Review
• EIS Consultancy Cost (other related studies, etc.)
QUESTIONS . . .
CLARIFICATIONS . . . CLARIFICATIONS . . .
DETAILS . . . . .