Copyright © 2020 pubrica. All rights reserved 1

What are the Reporting Guidelines to be Followed While Writing a Biomedical

Literature Review for a Manuscript

Dr. Nancy Agens, Head,

Technical Operations, Pubrica

sales@pubrica.com

In Brief

In short, a manuscript literature review

provides a critical assessment of the sources

(literature) you have gathered and read

surrounding your subject area and then

identifies a "gap" in that literature that your

research will attempt to address. A literature

review may also involve in a summary of

key sources. Still, a literature

review usually has aregulatory pattern and

incorporatesboth summary and synthesis,

often within specific theoretical categories.

Research guideline for biomedical literature

review is not an easy work for a manuscript,

and Pubrica has experts to focus on

biomedical literature review providing a high

quality of Writing and helps to publish in

international journals also.

Keywords: Medical manuscript editing

services, manuscript editing services,

academic manuscript editing, best

manuscript services, edit my manuscript,

journal manuscript editing services,

manuscript English editing services, how to

write your paper, English editing scientific

manuscripts, scientific manuscript editing,

scientific editing companies, plagiarism

correction.

I. INTRODUCTION

A literature review surveys books,

scholarly articles, and any other expert

relevant to an article issue, field of

research, or theory so as to provide

information, summary, and critical

evaluation of these works about the

research issues being searched. Literature

reviews are written to provide an overview

of sources you have analysed while

researching a particular topic and to

determine your readers how your research

fits within a larger field of study.

II. STEPS IN PREPARING A LITERATURE

REVIEW

1. Regulate which manuscript writings are

commonly allowed to be significant and

acquire access to them.

2. As you gather each of these works, take

notes on

The author's field of ability and

recognition.

The types of information the author

focussed on (e.g., case studies,

narratives, statistics, primary sources)

and the accuracy of this evidence.

The author's angle.

The author's dispute (indicating which

are most convincing and which are less

so).

The author's input to the scholarly

discussion of the topic.

3. Once you are adequately familiar with the

original works you have examined, look for

arrangement among them. Regulate how they

compare and contrast.

III. REPORTING GUIDELINES OF

BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE REVIEW

The Introduction provides the understanding

of your topic and gives a brief preview of the

tendency you have determined in the academic

manuscript editing of the paper.

The body involves more major information

about notable comparison and characteristic,

points of arrangement and disarrangement,

trends you have detected. Usethe best

Copyright © 2020 pubrica. All rights reserved 2

manuscript service team to introduce and

clarify these relations among the independent

scholarly works you have investigated.

The conclusion contributes to an analysis of

what is known and thought about the topic and

what is left to explore.

IV. LENGTH OF A LITERATURE REVIEW

In the absence of a specific report about the

range of a literature review, astandard

guideline of thumb is that it will be

corresponding to the length of your entire

paper. If your article is 15 pages long, 2-3

pages might suit for the literature review, and

there should provide no plagiarism correction.

V. DEVELOPMENT OF LITERATURE

REVIEW

1. Near the beginning of an investigation,

state out especially what will and will not

be hidden.

2. Define your point of view initially in the

report: this serves as the thesis statement

of the review.

3. Aim for a bright and cohesive essay that

integrates the essential details of the

literature and communicates your point of

view.

4. Use subheadings, specifically in lengthy

reviews

5. Use passages to help trace your argument

6. If your topic teaches across development,

consider analysis studies from each subject

separately

7. Check the flow of your dispute for unity.

VI. BENEFITS OF LITERATURE REVIEW

By compiling previous research on a topic,

literature reviews have various benefits.

These include:

Literature reviews help readers explain

what is known about a problem

without having to find and read

throughdifferent expert on journal

manuscript editing services.

Literature reviews help "set the stage"

for nextlearning about new research on

a given topic (such as if they are

arranged in the Introduction of a larger

research paper). In alternative words,

they afford valuable background and

context.

Literature reviews can also provide

advice the writer learn about a given

topic while qualifying the report itself.

VII. CONCLUSION

As biomedical research, no matter how

dramatic the results are not complete until the

results are published. In summary, the primary

purpose of writing a useful literature review in

biomedical research is to afford a sequential

on published articles to evaluate and analyse

the body of the proposed study. Biomedical

research allows to study medicine issues and

problems using different techniques, and it is

essential to define the literature gap and need

for the present study. To lessor your pressure

and produce quality literature review section,

our experts will support you during this

process in biomedical research article writing

without any mistakes.

Copyright © 2020 pubrica. All rights reserved 2

REFERENCES 1. Galvan. (2006). Writinga literature review: a guide for

students of the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Glendale,

CA: pyrczak publishing.

2. Chipperfield L, Citrome L, Clark J, et al. Authors'

Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your

research published. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:1967–

82

3. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for

systematic reviews of interventions. 2011. [Accessed on

24/10/2012]

4. Maggio LA, Tannery NH, Kanter SL

(2011) Reproducibility of literature search reporting in

medical education reviews.

5. Pautasso M (2010) Worsening file-drawer problem in the

abstracts of natural, medical and social science

databases.