umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

download umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

of 20

Transcript of umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    1/20

    ULTRA MEGA POWER

    PLANTS AND POLICY

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    2/20

    BACKGROUND With India being a country of chronic powerdeficits, the Government of India has planned to

    provide "power for all" by the end of

    the Eleventh Five-Year Plan (2007 2012).This would entail the creation of an additionalcapacity of at least 100,000 MW by 2012Ultra Mega Power projects, each with a capacityof 4000 MW or above, are being developed withthe aim of bridging this gapLaunched by Ministry of Power in 2005-06

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    3/20

    Central government has taken the initiativeunder tariff based competitive bidding routeusing super critical technology on BOO basisCentral Electricity Authority is the technical

    partner & Power finance corporation is the nodalagencySeparate SPVs were provided for each project toundertake project development activities

    including bid process managementIn addition to Ultra Mega thermal powerProjects, Ministry of Power is also taking stepsfor bringing up large Hydro Projects and largesize Transmission Projects on the fast track

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    4/20

    ROLE OF MINISTRY OFPOWER

    Ministry of Power to be facilitator forcoordination with concerned Ministries/ agenciesand State Government for ensuring:

    Coal block allotment for pithead projectsEnvironment/ forest clearancesFacilitate acquisition of land

    Required support from State Govt. & itsagenciesTo facilitate proper payment securitymechanism with State Govt./ State utilities

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    5/20

    CONCEPTSetting up of large projects of 4000 MW at asingle location: ensuring economies of scaleAward of projects to developer through tariff

    based competitive bidding : ensuring cheaper powerUtilization of super critical technology: ensuringhigher efficiency and lower CO 2 emissions

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    6/20

    The first UMPP, developed by TATA Power atMundra, Gujarat has been commissioned andcontributes 4,000 MW in power to the northern

    grid.Total number of UMPPs viewed are 16 ,out ofwhich awarded are 4-

    I. Sasan UMPP, Madhya PradeshII. Mundra UMPP, GujaratIII. Krishnapatnam UMPP, Andhra PradeshIV. Tilaiya UMPP, Jharkhand

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    7/20

    POLICIES FORDEVELOPMENT OF UMPPPROVISION OF ELECTRICITY ACT,2003 Provides that regulatory commissions shalladopt the tariff if it is determined throughtransparent process of bidding accordance withguidelines issued by central government

    Aims at moving away from cost plus approachfor tariff determination & expected to encourage private sector investment

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    8/20

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    9/20

    O BJECTIVES OF THE P OLICY

    Access to Electricity Available for all households innext five years.

    Availability of Power Demand to be fully met by2012.Shortages to be overcome and spinning reserve tobe available. Per capita availability of electricity to be increasedto over 1000 units by 2012. Minimum lifeline consumption of 1 unit/household/day as a merit good by year 2012. Financial Turnaround and Commercial Viability ofElectricity Sector.

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    10/20

    ELECTRICITY TARIFF POLICY

    Objective is to promote competition, efficiencyin operations & improvement in quality ofsupply

    To ensure availability of electricity to consumersat reasonable and competitive ratesPolicy stipulates that all future requirement of

    power needs to be procured competitively bydistribution licenses except in cases of expansionof existing projects

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    11/20

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    12/2012

    BIDDING PROCESS WOULD START WITH THEREGULATOR APPROVING THE DEMAND

    FORECAST FOR THE DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES

    Demand forecast forshort / medium /

    long term

    Regulatoryapproval offorecast

    Procurementprocess

    Path 1

    Using non-standardbid documents

    Using standardbid documents

    Path 2

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    13/20

    13

    PROPOSED POWER PROCUREMENT BIDDING PROCESSIF STANDARD DOCUMENTS ARE USED

    Key activities/Salient points

    At each stage we mayspecify minimumnumber of bids to

    proceed to next stage

    Requirementdefinition

    Initiate RFQ Shortlistbidders

    RFP Bidding Evaluationof bids

    Awardof bid(s)

    Post bidnegotiations

    Specificationof

    Quantum Timing Duration of

    contract

    Publishnotice

    Issue RFQ

    Evaluateresponsesto RFQs

    Shortlistbidders

    For shorttermcontractsbidders maybe pre-qualified

    Issue RFPto selectedbidders

    Conductpre-bidconference

    Short listedbiddersinvited tosubmit bids

    Technicalcompliancemust for anybid to beconsidered

    Determinationof winner onbases of pricebids

    Use ofindependent

    observer ifnecessary RFQ/RFP process may be combined into singlestep, especially for short term contracts

    Regulator kept informed at all stages of theprocess

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    14/20

    14

    PROPOSED POWER PROCUREMENT BIDDING PROCESS IN CASEOF DEVIATIONS FROM STANDARD BIDDING DOCUMENTS

    Any modificationssuggested by bidders, ordue to any other reasons tobe approved by regulator possibly over severalrounds of iterations

    Requirementdefinition

    Preparebiddingdocuments

    Initiate RFQ Shortlistbidders

    Seek regulatoryapproval

    Iterations ondevelopment ofbid documents

    Regulatoryclearance offorecast

    A

    RFP Bidding Evaluationof bids

    Awards ofbid

    Post bidnegotiations

    ARegulators commentson process and goahead

    Even though activeregulatory approval

    needed in only certainstages, but the regulator is

    always kept informed ofall developments

    Regulatoryapproval if

    required

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    15/20

    15

    IN THE RFQ STAGE, BIDDERS SHOULD BE SCREENED ON THEBASIS OF AN ARRAY OF METRICS

    Financial metricsTechnical metrics Past record

    To ensure supplycontracts, in case ofdefault

    To minimise risk ofdelay/shortfall

    To preventfrivolous/mischievousbidders

    To ensure supplycontracts, in case ofdefault Net worth

    Credit worthiness Bank/other financial

    guarantees

    For new plants Past infrastructure

    project execution Resource raising

    For existing plants Reliability Performance in the past

    Tie ups with transmissioncompanies preferred

    Should be an organizationof repute

    No default on previouscontracts

    Net worth Credit worthiness Bank/other financial

    guarantees For long term contracts

    trader should show thecapability/history to source

    70-80% of contractamount

    Tie ups with generatorsand transmissioncompanies are preferred

    Source of power has to bespecified

    Trader of repute No default on past

    contracts Past litigation record No conflict of interest

    between other obligationsand contract being bid

    Limits to vary by duration ofcontract and amount of loadcontracted

    To be suitably relaxed in initial stages fortraders, as they would have no history oftrading operations

    Forgenerators

    For traders

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    16/20

    16

    FOR MEDIUM/LONG TERM CONTRACTS, AT RFP STAGE, BIDSSHOULD BE SCREENED BASED ON NON PRICE EVALUATION PRIORTO PRICE COMPARISONSElement forevaluation Details

    Financial guarantee covering supply default

    Different bidders could be capable of delivering power atdifferent points in grid

    Most reliable/least bottlenecked point most preferable

    Relevant for time of day contracts, or for parts of long termcontract

    Best fit to demand should get preference

    Bidder asking for least financial guarantee from buyer would bepreferred

    Risk sharing mechanism in case of forced outages/unforeseencircumstances

    Suppliersguarantee

    Delivery point

    Deliverydates/period

    Buyersguarantee

    Force majeure /risk sharing

    All these aspectsneed to besufficiently

    detailed in the

    standard biddocuments andprocesses, to

    enable bids to beefficiently andtransparently

    evaluated/ rejectedon technical merits

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    17/20

    17

    BUYER SHOULD SPECIFY THE BID STRUCTURE IN DETAIL

    Whether partbidding is allowed?

    What is being bidfor?

    What is the tariffstructure used?

    No part bidding Part bidding allowed Part bidding allowed in multiples

    of some pre-specified minimumbid unit (preferred option)

    Energy Capacity Percentage of load (varying)

    Single part tariff Two part tariff with suitable

    indexation (preferred)

    Elementsof a bid

    Illustrative

    examples

    Element

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    18/20

    18

    INTERNATIONAL PRECEDENTS OFFER SEVERAL USEFUL TIPS FORFORMULATING THE COMPETITIVE GUIDELINES

    Aspect International examplesReference documentIssue date/number

    Bidding for part of thecontract

    RFP for Central Maine Power Company allowsbidders to bid in multiples of 20% of total contractamount

    November 18, 2003;issued by Maine PUC

    Use of Independent

    observer

    Independent observer was used for overseeingthe process of RFPs for Portland GeneralElectric Company

    January 20, 2004; Interimreport of independentobserver

    Use of discounting/NPV calculations forevaluation

    Public service commission of Maryland approveduse of single discounted average term price

    (DATP) for evaluation of bids in the phase IIsettlement proceedings Order no. 78710 Case no.8908; Phase II September2003

    Pre-qualification ofbidders to form apanel

    Rules of the Florida Public Service Commissionon general purchasing procedures allow theprequalification of bidders to form a panel

    Ch.25-25 Sup no.194

    Financial guaranteesfrom bidders

    RFP for Central Maine Power Company requiredbidders to provide financial guarantees upto US$1.21 million/month and 1.50 million/month whilebidding for service to 2 classes of consumers

    November 18, 2003;issued by Maine PUC

    Bidding for percentageof load

    Rather than a fixed load (in MW/ MWh) the bidmay be asked for the percentage of the utilitysload, so as to offload some risk to the suppliers

    EPSA guidebook for designimplementation andmonitoring of competitivepower supply solicitations

    Bidding for partialduration

    EPSA guidelines mention use of annuity basedcalculations while comparing bids for unequal(part) duration and choosing a lower overall bidportfolio

    EPSA guidebook for designimplementation andmonitoring of competitivepower supply solicitations

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    19/20

  • 8/11/2019 umpp-140405075603-phpapp02

    20/20