Tomkins 96
-
Upload
muhammad-afris-camlinoti -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Tomkins 96
![Page 1: Tomkins 96](https://reader036.fdocument.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082723/577ce3a71a28abf1038ca995/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
7/30/2019 Tomkins 96
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tomkins-96 1/3
Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1996 Vol. 21
NITROGEN METABOLISM IN RUSA DEER ( Ce r v u s t i mo r e n s i s )
N.W. TOMKINS and N.P. McMENIMAN
Dept of Farm Animal Medicine and Production, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072
SUMMARY
Dry matter intake, nitrogen intake, nitrogen digestibility, rumen ammonia-N and plasma urea-N
concentration were measured in young rusa deer fed 4 diets containing 90 to 205 g/kg DM crude protein.
The level of crude protein associated with maximal voluntary food intake and dry matter digestibility for
these animals was found to be about 160 g/kg DM. Plasma urea-N was positively related to rumen ammonia
concentration.
Keywords: deer, Cervus timorensis, protein, digestibility
INTRODUCTION
It is estimated that in south-east Queensland there are 160 deer farms, farming approximately 20,000 deer
(Mackenzie et 1993) of which up to 50% are rusa deer timorensis) (Woodford pers corn. 1995).
Farmed deer are grazed on a variety of native, annual or perennial pastures with or without irrigation.
In Queensland, the sub-tropical species Rhodes grass gayana), and
kikuyu (Pennisetum form the basis of most pastures, with irrigated ryegrass-clover swards
being used during the winter/spring period. The use of supplementary feeds such as sorghum, maize or
proprietary pellets varies.
There are little data available on specific nutrient requirements for rusa deer. Grimaud and Chardonnet
(1989) demonstrated continuous and regular liveweight gains over a 12 month period on a diet of green
grass (Brachiaria together with maximum hay, supplemented with a commercial
concentrate. Unpublished University of Queensland (Gatton College) work suggests that on high quality
diets, rusa will do no better than temperate deer species. Under normal paddock conditions rusa appear
better at utilising stalky pasture than red deer (Cervus 1989). Rusa appear better ableto deal with varying levels of feed supply than red deer by readily storing body fat and so surviving periods
of nutritional stress (Woodford and Dunning 1991).
The object of this experiment was to determine the crude protein requirements of growing rusa deer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Eight entire male rusa deer calves, (4-26 days old; liveweight) were obtained from The University
of Queensland at Gatton College and hand reared. At 8 months of age the animals were adapted to pelleted
feeds and introduced to metabolism crates. The experiment commenced when the deer were 9 months old
and weighed approximately 32kg liveweight.
DietsFour pelleted diets containing 91, 134, 168 and crude protein/kg DM were fed to each of the eight
deer in a replicated latin square design. The composition of the diets is shown in Table 1. The diets were
fed ad at 0800 and 1600 hours.
Sampling procedures and analysesThe deer were fed their respective diets during adaptation periods before they were placed in
enclosed metabolism cages for a further 7 days during which total feed intake, faeces and urine output weremeasured. Ten and 20% sub-samples of faeces and urine were collected daily and bulked over the collectionperiod, respectively. On the day after each collection period samples of liquor were obtained and
jugular blood samples were collected into 10 tubes containing lithium heparin 2 hours following themorning feed. liquor samples were obtained with a stomach tube. Five milliltres of liquor was
placed in an equal volume of for subsequent NH, analysis.and feed samples were dried at for 24 hours, ground to pass through a mesh and
analysed for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), neutral detergent (NDF) and nitrogen (N) content.Samples were in an electric muffle furnace at for 3 hours. NDF was determined according to
Goering and Van Soest (1970). The N content of the feed, faeces and urine was determined by a combustiontechnique using an autoanalyser (Nitrogen Determination Systems FP-428, LECO Aust. Pty Ltd). The NH,-
255
![Page 2: Tomkins 96](https://reader036.fdocument.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082723/577ce3a71a28abf1038ca995/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
7/30/2019 Tomkins 96
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tomkins-96 2/3
Aust. Anim. Prod. 1996 Vol. 21
N content of the liquor was found by titration on a Kjeltec Auto 1030 Analyser (Tecator Sweden).Plasma urea-N concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically using an enzymicendpoint method (Trace Scientific Aust).
Results of the experiment were analysed by analysis of variance using Statistical Analysis SystemInc. Indiana, USA).
RESULTS
The chemical composition of the diets are shown in Table 1. The diets contained tog crude protein/kg DM. On all diets, animals maintained an average liveweight of 38.0 kg.
Table 1. Composition of diets (dry matter)
The mean intake for diets III and IV (1365, 13 14 g was significantly higher than thatfor diets I and II (1234, 1238 g When comparing diets II and IV DMI was notsignificantly different.
Dry matter digestibilities were similar for diets II, III and IV, and were significantly higher than that fordiet I (Table 2).
Nitrogen intake and digestibility increased as the protein content of the diet increased. The mean Nbalance of the animals increased up to a N intake of 36.7 g/day (diet III), above which added nitrogen in thediet had only a marginal effect.
Plasma urea-N and ammonia-N tended to increase as dietary N increased (Table 2).
Table 2. Effect of diet on intake, digestibility and nitrogen measurements,
256
![Page 3: Tomkins 96](https://reader036.fdocument.pub/reader036/viewer/2022082723/577ce3a71a28abf1038ca995/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
7/30/2019 Tomkins 96
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/tomkins-96 3/3
Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1996 Vol. 21
DISCUSSION
If N balance is regarded as reflecting protein requirements, the results of this experiment indicate that the
crude protein requirement for young entire male rusa deer approaching 40 kg liveweight is 160 g/kg DM
or 37 g N/day. Crude protein requirements are a combination of digestible protein (RDP) and by-pass
or undegraded dietary protein (UDP) requirements. If it is assumed that the degradability of the diet
containing 160 g DM in this experiment was 0.6, the theoretical supply of RDP and UDP were 138
and 92 g/day respectively. If the efficiency of microbial protein production is similar to that of sheep and
cattle (8.4 g microbial ME intake) (Anon. 1990) then the RDP requirements for diets II and III would
have been 81 and 82 g/kg DM respectively. The supply of RDP for diets II and III was sufficient to meet
these calculated requirements, but for diet II it may be assumed that UDP was limiting because the N balance
was not maximal. Whether the UDP supply was in excess of requirements for diet III is not known.
Satter and Roffler (1976) found that for efficient microbial crude protein production a NH,-N
concentration of at least 5 ml was required. This concentration was achieved with diets II and III.
That diet IV produced excess RDP is indicated by the elevated NH,-N and significantly higher plasma
urea-N concentrations. From the data presented in Table 2 it appears that a NH,-N concentration in
excess of 5 ml is associated with a plasma urea-N concentration in excess of 15 ml. This
is similar to the relationship between ruminal-NH, and plasma urea-N reported by Elliott et al. (1984) in
sheep.
Increasing dietary CP concentration had the effect of increasing DMI up to a dietary CP concentration
of 160 g/kg DM, the same concentration that was associated with maximal N balance. A mean DMI across
all diets indicated an intake of 3.4% liveweight. This apparently high value corresponds to a period of
expected rapid growth rate for early maturing animals. Javan rusa calves show high growth rates for the first
6-9 months, recording liveweight gains of g/day under farmed conditions (Woodford and Dunning
1989, 199 1) compared to the animals in this experiment which at a similar age gained 200 to 240 g/day
unpubl data). Over a period Grimaud and Chardonnet (1989) reported that male rusa
gained 64 kg, equivalent to about 175 .
Calculated ME content of diets and apparent DMD values indicate that these animals digest diets as
efficiently as sheep or cattle. Based on industry observations, rusa deer perform better than the temperate
deer species during periods of poor pasture quality, indicating some degree of nutritional advantage overtemperate species. It is possible that this advantage is conferred by the rusa deer having a shorter
retention time than red deer; Fennessy et al. (1980) concluded that this was the mechanism that gave red
deer an advantage over sheep. While a relatively rapid passage of food could be expected to result in less
complete digestion, it permits a greater intake.
In conclusion, N balance of these animals was directly related to increasing dietary crude protein. It was
found that for rusa deer at this age and liveweight the crude protein requirement is 160 g/kg DM which
would be expected for animals at this physiological state.
REFERENCES
ANON. (1990). In “Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Ruminants”, p.8. (CSIRO: Melbourne).
ELLIOTT, R., N.P., NORTON, B.W. and CORTES, F.J. (1984). Aust.
Anim. Prod. 15: 337-40.
FENNESSY, P.F., GREER, G.J., FORBES, D.A. (1980). Anim. Prod. 40: 158-62.
GOERING, H.K. and VAN SOEST, P.J. (1970). In “Forage Fibre Analysis”, U.S.D.A. Agricultural
Handbook.No.379, Washington, DC p.8.
GRIMAUD, P. and CHARDONNET, P. (1989). Grassland Congress, Nice, p. 1281.
MACKENZIE, A.R. (1985b). In “Biology of Deer Production”, Roy. Vol. 22, (Eds P.F. Fennessy
and K.R. Drew) p.213.
MACKENZIE, A.R., DANIEL, D.J., EVANS, G.R. and BURTON, D.W. (1993). “A Guide to Deer
Farming in Queensland”, QDPI.
L.D. and ROFFLER, R.E. (1976). In “Tracer Studies on NPN for Ruminants. III”, IAEA, Vienna.
WOODFORD, (1989). “Deer Seminar Notes”, p. 11, (Queensland Agricultural College: Lawes).
WOODFORD, and DUNNING, A. (1989). Fed. Deerbreeder. 5.
WOODFORD, and DUNNING, A. (1991). “The Biology of Deer”, (Ed. R. Brown) p.197
York).
257