Elfutó elektronok és fütyülő hullámok kölcsönhatása tokamak plazmákbaN
TOKAMAK RESEARCH IN IOFFE INSTITUTE
Transcript of TOKAMAK RESEARCH IN IOFFE INSTITUTE
27th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference (FEC 2018)
Gandhinagar, India 22 – 27 October 2018
TOKAMAK RESEARCH
IN
IOFFE INSTITUTE
N.N. Bakharev et al.
List of contributors
2/24
N.N. BAKHAREV, G.I. ABDULLINA, V.I. AFANASIEV, A.B. ALTUKHOV, L.G. ASKINAZI, N.A. BABINOV, A.N. BAZHENOV, A.A. BELOKUROV, I.M.
BUKREEV, F.V. CHERNYSHEV, I.N. CHUGUNOV, D.N. DOINIKOV, V.V. DYACHENKO, L.A. ESIPOV, D.B. GIN, A.D. GURCHENKO, E.Z. GUSAKOV,
V.K. GUSEV, M.V. ILIASOVA, M.A. IRZAK, A.N. KONOVALOV, E.M. KHILKEVITCH, S.A. KHITROV, N.A. KHROMOV, E.O. KISELEV, V.A. KORNEV,
A.N. KOVAL, D.V. KOUPRIENKO, S.V. KRIKUNOV, O.L. KRUTKIN, G.S. KURSKIEV, S.I. LASHKUL, S.V. LEBEDEV, A.D. MELNIK, V.B. MINAEV, I.V.
MIROSHNIKOV, E.E. MUKHIN, V.O. NAIDENOVA, A.N. NOVOKHATSKII, A.S. NAVOLOTSKY, K.YU. OSHUEV, M.I. PATROV, M.P. PETROV, S.Ya
PETROV, YU.V. PETROV, I.A. POLYNOVSKY, A.YU. POPOV, A.G. RAZDOBARIN, D.V. RAZUMENKO, V.V. ROZHDESTVENSKY, N.V. SAKHAROV,
D.S.SAMSONOV, A.N. SAVELIEV, P.B. SHCHEGOLEV, A.E. SHEVELEV, A.D. SLADKOMEDOVA, A.I. SMIRNOV, V.V. SOLOKHA, V.A. SOLOVEI, A.YU.
TELNOVA, V.A. TOKAREV, S.YU. TOLSTYAKOV, P.V. TRETINNIKOV, A.S. TUKACHINSKY, V.I. VARFOLOMEEV, N.A. ZHUBR
Ioffe Institute
St.-Petersburg, Russia
Email: [email protected]
C. LECHTE
Institute of Interfacial Process Eng.
and Plasma Technology
70569 Stuttgart, Germany
E.G. ZHILIN
Ioffe Fusion Technology Ltd.
St.-Petersburg, Russia
S. HEURAUX
Institute Jean Lamour UMR 7198
CNRS, Université de Lorraine
54000 Nancy, France
M.D. BLEHSHTEIN, V.V. BULANIN, A.V. PETROV, A.YU.
YASHIN
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University
St.-Petersburg, Russia
E.N. BONDARCHUK, S.N. KAMENSHIKOV, A.A. KAVIN,
K.M. LOBANOV, A.B. MINEEV
JSC «NIIEFA»,
St.-Petersburg, Russia
V.I. DAVYDENKO, A.A. IVANOV, V.V. KOLMOGOROV,
I.V. SHIKHOVTSEV
BINP SB RAS
Novosibirsk, Russia
A.V. GORBUNOV
NRC Kurchatov Institute
Moscow, Russia
AL.P. CHERNAKOV
JSC «Spectral-Tech»,
St.-Petersburg, Russia
S.P. PANDYA, S.N. PANDYA
Institute for Plasma Research
Gandhinagar, 382-428, India
T.P. KIVINIEMI, S. LEERINK, P. NISKALA
Aalto University
Espoo, Finland
Outline
• Introduction
• Globus-M • Energy confinement
• Alfven eigenmodes
• Discharge disruptions
• SOL study
• FT-2: benchmarking of the full-f gyrokinetic modeling against DR using synthetic
diagnostics
• TUMAN-3M • L-H transition induced by GAMs and pellet injection
• ICE in NBI-heated plasma
• ICE in OH plasma
• Alfven eigenmodes in OH plasma
• Theory group: anomalous absorption and emission in ECRH experiments
• ITER diagnostics development • NPA and GRS
• DTS and LIF
• Globus-M2 first plasma
• Summary
3/24
Introduction
• In 2018, Ioffe Institute celebrates its 100th anniversary.
• Fusion research in Ioffe Institute has been going on for more than 60 years.
• At present – theory group, ITER group, 3 tokamaks:
Globus-M2 FT-2 TUMAN-3M
R [cm]/a [cm] 36/24 = 1.5 55/8 = 6.8 53/22 = 2.4
BT [T] / Ip [kA] 1 / 500 3 / 40 1 / 180
4/24
Globus-M
parameter value
R [cm]/a [cm] 36/24 = 1.5
k 2.0
δ 0.5
BT, T 0.5
Ip , kA 250
t pulse , ms 130
PNBI [MW] 1
1999 – 2017
BT: 0.4 T → 0.5 T
Ip: 200 kA → 250 kA
Last experimental campaign:
[Bakharev N.N. et al. Nucl. Fusion 2018 accepted manuscript] 5/24
Globus-M: Energy confinement
0 1 2 3 40
1
2
3
4
WG
LB,
kJ
Wexp
, kJ
τEGLB~Ip
0.51±0.26 BT
1.2±0.1Pabs-0.54±0.26ne
0.67±0.04
MAST: τE~Ip0.59BT
1.4 NSTX: τE~Ip0.57BT
1.08 IPB98(y,2): τE~Ip0.93BT
0.15Pabs-0.69ne
0.4
0,0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,40,0
0,5
1,0
1,5
2,0
BT
E~
*
-0.4
BT E
, T
ms
*
• Energy confinement time strongly depends on toroidal magnetic field.
• Normalized energy confinement time exhibits moderate dependence on collisionality.
• Ion heat transport is close to neoclassical level. Anomalous contribution is observed at low collisionality.
NSTX BTτE~ν* -0.79
MAST BTτE~ν *-0.82
EX/P5-2 (Thursday), Kurskiev G.S. et al [G.S. Kurskiev et al. PPCF 59 (2017)] 6/24
0.01 0.10.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
TC
XR
S
i0/T
ne
o
i0
Globus-M: TAE
[BULANIN V., et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 43 12 (2017) 1067] [GUSEV V. et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 44 1 (2018) 67]
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.70
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
180 kA
240 kA
B, 10-3T
drop of 28.5 keV CX neutral flux, %
137 138 139 140 141200
400
600
800
56
84
112
140
-3.0
-1.5
0.0
1.5
3.0
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7137 138 139 140 141
NPA flux, E=27 keV (a.u.)
t, ms
neutron rate (a.u.)
MHD signal (a.u.)
<ne> (10
19*m
-3)
180 kA, 0.4T 240 kA, 0.5 T
• Modes became more frequent due to better fast ion (FI) accumulation
because of the better classical FI confinement and lower TAE-induced
losses.
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
145 146 147 148 149 150
-3.0
-1.5
0.0
1.5
3.0
145 146 147 148 149 150200
400
600
800
<ne> (10
13*cm
-3)
MHD signal (a.u.)
t, ms
NPA f lux, E= 26 keV (a.u.)
TAE-induced Fast Ion losses
• BT increase also resulted in FI
losses decrease, but this effect
was much weaker
7/24
Globus-M: TAE
[BULANIN V., et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 43 12 (2017) 1067] [GUSEV V. et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 44 1 (2018) 67]
-3
0
3
0,4
0,6
0,8
0,4
0,6
0,8
0,4
0,6
0,8
0
100
200
f, k
Hz
f, k
Hz
f, k
Hz
t, ms
f, k
Hz
MP
#36645
0,020000,040000,080000,1600
a
b
c
d
e
f
0
100
200
, a.u
., a.u
., a.u
.
DBS, 48 GHz
0
100
200
DBS, 39 GHz
140 142 144 146 148 150
0
100
200
DBS, 29 GHz
0,0
1,0
2,0
ne, 10
19 m
-3
Ip = 250 kA
Btor
= 0.5 T
MP
, a.u
.
0.2 0.4 0.6-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
2/
A
2=0.1307
toroidal mode number n=1
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭: 𝝆 = 𝟎. 𝟒𝟓 − 𝟎. 𝟖𝟓
36 40 44 48 52 56 60
0
4
8
12
16
20
t = 141.2 ms
n=1
n=2
~B
[
gau
ss]
R [cm]
#37001 n=1
n=2
0
2
4
6
LCFS
q
q
𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐗 + 𝐊𝐀𝐗𝐄 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠: 𝝆 = 𝟎. 𝟒 − 𝟎. 𝟗
52 56 60 64 68 720.6
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.1
r = 18 cm
r = 0 cm
f, M
Hz
t, ms
kII=1.74 m-1
L -
H t
ran
sit
ion
r = 22 cm
TAE localization by DBS :
8/24
Z, m
R, m
Comparison of the experimental and calculated TAE localization
TUMAN-3M: OH GAE
9/24
Globus-M: disruption study
• tCQ ~ Ip like in NSTX, but not in IDDB
• Linear dependence, almost no difference for H and D
0
2
4
6
8
0 0,4 0,8 1,2
t CQ/(SL)
( m
s/m
2)
Ip/S (MA/m2)
ITERmin:
tCQ/SL ≥ 1.67 ms/m2
IDDB: tCQ/SL : 1,7-10 ms/m2
Globus-M
[SAKHAROV, N. et al, Plasma Phys. Rep. 43 (2017) 422] [SAKHAROV, N., GUSEV V., KAVIN A. et al, Plasma Phys. Rep., 44 (2018) 335]
17 kPa << Patm
IDDB: tCQ = (t20-t80)/0.6
[ABDULLINA G. et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 44 (2018) 108]
10/24
Globus-M: SOL width
New adjustable 9-pin probe was installed at LFS midplane.
Typical Globus-M Te and ne profiles
λq ~ Ip-1.2BT
0.6 λq ~Ip-1.1BT
0.42
[Tokarev V.A. et al J. of Phys.: Conf. Series 1094 (2018) 012003]
[Eich 2011] scaling: [Eich 2013] scaling:
Globus-M database fitting: λq ~Ip-0.9
0 5 10 15 20 25 300
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
BT=0.4 T
BT=0.5 T42 eV
47 eV
Separatrix
Te (
eV
)
R-Rsep (mm)
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
BT=0.4 T
BT=0.5 T
1.9×1018 m-3
4.1×1018 m-3
Separatrix
ne (
10
18 m
-3)
R-Rsep (mm) 0 2 4 6 8 100
2
4
6
8
10
12 JET
AUG
C-Mod
MAST
NSTX
D3D
Globus-M
q Eich-2013 (mm)
q E
xp
eri
me
nta
l (m
m)
λq scaling fitting
Good agreement with both EICH scalings is observed:
[ABDULLINA G. et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 44 (2018) 108]
11/24
FT-2 tokamak
High field high aspect ratio tokamak.
parameter value
R [cm]/a
[cm]
55/8= 6.8
BT, T 3
Ip , kA 40
qa 3 - 6
PLHH [kW] 180
12/24
COMPREHENSIVE BENCHMARKING OF FULL-F GLOBAL GK MODELING
AGAINST THE FT-2 TOKAMAK DOPPLER REFLECTOMETRY DATA
TH/8-2 (Friday-poster, Saturday-oral) A. B. Altukhov et al.
HFS X-mode DR experimental data VS ELMFIRE code modeling via fast linear synthetic diagnostic version based on the reciprocity theorem full-wave synthetic diagnostic version utilizing the IPF-FD3D code
• Good agreement between the measured and computed DR frequency spectra (the spectra frequency shift, width and form for all incidence angles). The mean fluctuation velocity and GAM characteristics were close thus indicating correct description of the global electric field dynamics by the code.
-800 -400 0 400 8000.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
f (kHz)
P (
no
rm.
un
.)
experiment
FS DR
FWS DR
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 40.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
synth.with phase
measur.
Co
her
ence
f (GHz)
synth.
full wave
-20 -10 0 10 200.00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.91.01.1 -10 -5 0 5 10
(cm
-1)
ya (mm)
Ps (
no
rm.u
n.)
experiment
FS DR
FWS DR
• The variation of the DR signal at growing incidence angles in experiment is slower than predicted by both synthetic diagnostics because of the overestimation of the turbulence poloidal wavenumber spectrum decay rate with growing wavenumber due to incorrect modelling in the small-scale (ETG-mode) domain.
• The experimental radial correlation DR data is in agreement with full-wave synthetic diagnostic prediction thus indicating correct description of the turbulence radial wavenumber spectra. Substantial difference found for the fast synthetic diagnostic is related to the large contribution of long scale fluctuation, which is suppressed in experiment by the probing wave phase modulation (transition to the nonlinear regime of DR operation).
13/24
Compact tokamak TUMAN-3M
parameter value
R [cm]/a [cm] 53/22 = 2.4
BT, T 1
Ip , kA 180
t pulse , ms 80
PNBI [MW] 1
Compact conventional tokamak.
14/24
TUMAN-3M and FT-2: modeling of the GAM-triggered L-H transition
[L.G. Askinazi et al 2017 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59 014037]
GAM-initiated LH-transition
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1400
5
10
15
20
25
Is
FT-2 (DEUTERIUM) r = 4.5 cm
grad n - L-mode
grad n, 1019 m-4
, 10
19 m
-2s
-1
0 2 4 6 8 100
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
H-mode
GAM
L-mode
L-mode
r = 21.5 cm
t, ms
EOSC
= 4.5 kV/m
EOSC
= 5.5 kV/m
dn
/dr,
10
19 m
-4
• Observed at TUMAN-3M.
• Not observed at FT-2 for similar conditions.
Thresholds on GAM amplitude and duration exist.
15/24
TUMAN-3M: modeling of pellet-triggered L-H transition
[T.P. Kiviniemi et al 2018 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 60 085010] [A.A. Belokurov et al 2018 Nucl. Fusion 58 112007]
-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5
0
20
40
60
0
20
40
60
80
0
1
2
3
4
5
gra
d n
, 1
01
9m
-4
t, ms
Sin
t, 1
01
9 m
-2s
-1
Gas puff
Pellet
0.21 m
D, m
2s
-1
Pellet injection
• Sufficient Er-shear and high particle source is needed for GAM- and pellet- H-mode triggering.
• If particle source is too low, self-sustaining H-mode is not possible for certain scenario.
The LH-transition occurred if the pellet evaporation
was peripheral.
0 10 20 30 40 500
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
grad n - L-mode
,
10
19 m
-2s
-1
grad n, 1019 m-4
IS - with pellet gas cloud
IS - before pellet
r/a = 0.96
[ABDULLINA G. et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 44 (2018) 108]
16/24
TUMAN-3M: Ion Cyclotron Emission during NBI heating
[ASKINAZI, L. et al, Nucl. Fus. 58 (2018) 082003]
• NBI Ion Cyclotron Emission (ICE) frequency corresponds to the central IC resonance for minority ions.
• Comes from core plasma region. • ICE frequency depends on Btor but not on ne. • Fine structure, oscillating with sawtooth.
• CAE instability excited by stagnating fast ions:
• w = lwci + k||vb
• Beam with E0, E0/2, E0/3, 2E0/3 -> fine structure
• Sawtooth may induce redistribution of fast ions
[ABDULLINA G. et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 44 (2018) 108]
17/24
TUMAN-3M: Ohmic Ion Cyclotron Emission
• Not caused by suprathermal ions.
• Spectrum typically consisted of 8-9 harmonics with frequencies
evolving with BT.
• Detected in H and D plasmas both in LFS and HFS.
• OICE fundamental depends on the probe position; it corresponds to
the ion-cyclotron resonance frequency of the main plasma ions in
the close vicinity of the corresponding magnetic probe.
• Could be understood in frames of the Ion Cyclotron Drift Instability
proposed by Mikhailovsky & Timofeev and based on ICE excitation
in inhomogeneous plasma: 𝝆𝒊 𝒂 ≥ 𝟐 𝒎𝒆 𝒎𝒊 𝟏 𝟐 , 𝐚 =𝟏
𝒏
𝒅𝒏
𝒅𝒓
−𝟏
Spectra of OH ICE, measured by the two
magnetic probes: LFS and HFS in H and D
plasmas.
18/24
ANOMALOUS ABSORPTION AND EMISSION IN ECRH EXPERIMENTS
DUE TO PARAMETRIC EXCITATION OF LOCALIZED UH WAVES
TH/P4-10 (Wednesday) E. Z. Gusakov et al.
18/24
A possibility of two-UH-plasmon parametric decay
instability excitation in X2 ECRH experiments in fusion
devices with non-monotonous density profile is
demonstrated in a wide plasma density range .
The instability leading to generation of the trapped UH
wave is excited at the pump power of about 100 kW.
Well above the threshold it is leading to anomalous
absorption rate of more than 10%.
The plasma microwave emission at the pump half
frequency ω0/2 and at the frequency 3ω0/2 is predicted
at the level of 50 W.
19/24
Neutral Particle Analyzer for ITER
Recent progress in the NPA developing. 3D design.
[Mironov M. et al., Nucl. Fusion 58 (2018) 082030]
[ABDULLINA G. et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 44 (2018) 108]
20/24
ITER Gamma Ray Spectrometer
FIP/P7-15 D. (Friday) B. Gin et al.
• Detectors of the GRS and NS are located in the Neutron Dump of the NPA.
• 3D-model of the ND support and alignment system has been developed.
• Electromotors, solenoids and position switches of the GRS and NS positioners have been successfully tested under the integral neutron flux of 1013 n/cm2.
GRS positioner
NS positioner
NS el. motor
GRS el. motor
NPA neutron dump
ND support and alignment system
20/24
21/24
ITER Divertor Thomson scattering/Laser-induced Fluorescence
[GORBUNOV A., Fus. Eng. and Design 123 (2017) 695] [MUKHIN E.et al., Fus. Eng. and Design 123 (2017) 686] [A.Kornev et al SOFT 2018]
[E.Mukhin et al FED 2017]
DTS/LIF equipment situated in ITER Lower Port #8. 1 — Strike point on the outer divertor target; 2 — Laser beams; 3 —
Front and back racks used for arrangement of DTS/LIF in vessel equipment and neutron shield components
FIP/P1-5 (Tuesday) A. G. Razdobarin et al.
Hardware design development:
• Special lasers: Nd:YAG(1064 nm) – main diagnostic laser for ITER DTS
• Prototype of Nd:YAG(946 nm) – for double-wavelengths TS calibration ITER DTS
• Digital Filter Polychromator
Laser equipment
Spectroscopic room
22/24
ITER Divertor Thomson scattering/Laser-induced Fluorescence
FIP/1-5 (Monday) E. E. Mukhin et al.
[A. Gorbunov et al Plasma Fus. Eng. and Design 123 2017 695]
[A. Gorbunov et al, SOFT 2018]
Meeting the requirements in input parameters for divertor plasma modelling
DTS/LIF provides simultaneous measurements of Te, ne, Ti, ni nHe/H/D/T distribution
in ITER divertor SOL providing simulation of
- Ionization balance: Rates of ionization and recombination (Te, ne);
- Emission intensity (Te ne ni nHe/H/D/T);
- Frictional force of the plasma flow due to collisions with neutrals (Ti ni nHe/H/D/T);
- Pressure of the incoming plasma flow (Te ne Ti ni).
A new kind of LIF spectroscopic scheme based on laser induced quenching of the
most intensive hydrogen line Hα = 656.1 nm is proposed.
23/24
Globus-M2
• R [cm]/a [cm]= 36/24 = 1.5
• BT = 1T, Ip = 500 kA
• Diverse diagnostics, heating
and CD systems, including
2xNBI, ICRH, LHCD, plasma gun
• Extreme Pheat /V = 6 MW/m3
First plasma: April 23rd Experimental campaign: end of 2018 FIP/P7-34 (Friday) V. B. Minaev et al.
[ABDULLINA G. et al. Tech. Phys. Lett. 44 (2018) 108]
24/24
Conclusion
• Experiments with increased BT and Ip in Globus-M demonstrated discharge improvement.
• Strong dependence of τE on BT was observed.
• For the first time TAE localization using DBS was measured. It is in a good agreement with modeling.
• tCQ was in a good agreement with IDDB. Almost no dependence on mi and linear dependence on Ip
was observed.
• λq midplane dependence was estimated as ~ Ip-1.2.
• Global full-f GK code benchmarking against DR data demonstrated good agreement in radial electric
field dynamics and turbulence radial correlation properties, but not in poloidal wavenumber spectrum
thus appealing to the multi-scale GK modeling
• The importance of particle source and Er-shear was demonstrated for GAM- and pellet- induced L-H
transition.
• ICE was observed in NBI-heated discharges in TUMAN-3M. The possible explanation is CAE
instability, excited by stagnating fast ions. ICE was also observed in OH plasma.
• More than 10% anomalous absorption of the ECRH power is predicted due to parametric excitation
of a localized UH wave. A measurable level of the plasma microwave emission at harmonics of the
pump wave half-frequency is predicted .
• Considerable progress in ITER NPA, GRS, DTS\LIF development has been made.
• New Globus-M2 spherical tokamak is online.
24/24
Thank you
for your attention!