Searching for the optimum between practical project expertise and process competence – optimized...
-
Upload
altair-engineering -
Category
Engineering
-
view
122 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Searching for the optimum between practical project expertise and process competence – optimized...
Searching for the optimum between
practical project expertise and process
competence – optimized component
design in the development process by
using HyperWorks
A. Falkner, G. Kepplinger, F. Schmalhofer
MAGNA STEYR Engineering, Austria
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 2
Outline
• Validated virtual development
Overview simulation methods
General remarks to the CAE-process
Structure & Durability: Technical & process tasks
• Application examples
Stiffness based multi-objective optimization of a car body section
Strength based design of a composite high pressure tank
Damage based shape optimization of a threaded tank valve component
under pulsating pressure
• Summary / Outlook
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 3
Validated Virtual Development / Overview Simulation
Methods
E CC PTO SOP
Virtual development based on a
validated platform vehicle
No prototype vehicles!
Validation of all targets
and homologation with
PTO & PP vehicles
Production at
MAGNA STEYR
since 2010
Multi Body Simulation
Finite Element Method
Statistical Energy Analysis
Computational Aero Acoustics
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Simulation methods
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 4
General remarks to the CAE-process
Multi Body Simulation Finite Element Method Statistical Energy
Analysis
Computational Aero Acoustics
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Interaction of the methods
to describe the NVH
frequency range up to
~ 8 kHz
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 5
General remarks to the CAE-process
Multi Body Simulation Finite Element Method Statistical Energy Analysis
Computational Aero Acoustics
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Top five:
• Common model / data strategy: MBS, one CBIW for SD, NVH and Crash, CFD
• Optimization strategy: One optimization-tool for all methods
• Correlation between simulation and measurement
• Link to the CAD-World via TeamCenter
• Software tools-environment: As simple as possible, as complex as necessary.
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 6
Structure & Durability: Technical & process tasks
Development, optimization and
validation of the durability function
on complete vehicle level
technic
al ta
sks
Pro
cess /
Structural durability
function & load spectra Simulation body
Simulation & methods
complete vehicle
• Load data analysis
• Generation of test-rig
programs
• Target settings &
validation
• Integration team
management
• CAE-body-management
• Support quotation process
• CAD2CAE regarding FEM
• CBIW model build-up for
Crash, NVH & SD
• ODC-coordination
• Product development
FEMSITE
• R&D-tasks
• Simulation & optimization
of the closed body in white
regarding
stiffness
strength
fatigue
• Simulation & optimization
of the complete vehicle
regarding misuse tests,
vibrational fatigue
• Modules: Suspension,
powertrain, battery
system, fuel-system,…
Complete vehicle
System
Component
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 7
Outline
• Validated virtual development
Overview simulation methods
General remarks to the CAE-process
Structure & Durability: Technical & process tasks
• Application examples
Stiffness based multi-objective optimization of a car body section
Strength based design of a composite high pressure tank
Damage based shape optimization of a threaded tank valve component
under pulsating pressure
• Summary / Outlook
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 8
Example 1: Stiffness based multi-objective optimization
of a car body section
Global stiffness,
static & dynamic BIW
Local stiffness,
static BIW
Strength: Body
Fatigue-life
Central questions in every body-in-white development:
• Where is the actual design?
• Balancing between targets cT, cB,…. and BIW-mass
• List of wall-thickness of each BIW-part
Hierarchical approach
body development
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 9
Example 1: Stiffness based multi-objective optimization
of a car body section
• Task / Boundaries
BIW fulfills / exceeds the stiffness targets
The mass of the BIW should be minimized and still fulfill the stiffness targets
Design variables: All wall thicknesses of BIW upper body (approx. 50kg),
65 discrete design variables
Show the trade-off between benefit (stiffness) and effort (mass) Pareto
• Approach
DOE (FE-runs)
Approximations / fit
Multi-objective optimization
Minimize mass
Maximize torsional stiffness
Maximize bending stiffness
Converged solution
Initial
design
mass
sta
tic b
endin
g s
tiffness
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 10
Example 1: Stiffness based multi-objective optimization
of a car body section
• Results
9.75 kg mass reduction eq.
to 65% of the mass potential
Stiffness targets still fulfilled
• Advantages of this approach
Fast results after changing boundaries (no rerun of FE-simulation)
Easy to understand results
Global optimization methods applicable
Mass potential Mass reduction
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 11
• Task
Minimization of composite mass of type IV pressure vessels (plastic liner with wounded
composite shell) for fuel systems
Load case: Burst pressure
Parameterized fast 3d section model for optimization
Automatic generation FEM model according liner
geometry & parameter setting of design variables
→ layer thickness, winding angle end of layer
Thickness increase dome area considered
Winding angle change in dome area
Contact FRP-layup / boss
• Approach
DOE: Search design space:
> 4000 FE runs, starting point for local optimization
Gradient based optimization for layup
Design verification with detailed simulation: Interaction FRP-layup and boss
Example 2: Strength based design of a composite
high pressure tank
burs
t pre
ssure
mass
Target
starting point for local optimization
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 12
Example 2: Strength based design of a composite
high pressure tank
fib
er
str
ain
bu
rst p
ressu
re
Benchmark Optimized
• Results:
Compared to benchmark vessel
15% composite mass reduction
Same burst pressure performance
Same tank volume
Hardware validation Composite tank
Simulation
Testing
cylindrical part dome area boss area
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 13
Example 3: Damage based shape optimization of a
threaded tank valve component under pulsating pressure
• Task: Increase the lifetime of Shut Off Valve (SOV) in pressure cycle test
• Simulation tools:
Abaqus non-linear simulation (contact, material)
FEMSITE nonlinear lifetime estimation
• Questions:
How much tightening torque?
Is re-tightening useful / necessary?
Optimal radius? Notch effect vs. thickness
Test scenario:
1. Pretension
2. End-of-line Test (105 MPa)
3. Unload pressure (0 MPa)
4. Re-tightening only if necessary (cost)
5. Pressure cycle test: 30.000 cycles 2 – 87,5 MPa
plastification
t
R
R
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 14
Example 3: Damage based shape optimization of a
threaded tank valve component under pulsating pressure
• Results: Parameter study A bigger radius is better, but at about 2mm
no significant recognizable improvement
Re-tightening is recommended at low tightening
torques (<100Nm)
A low damage value can be found
without re-tightening, but requires higher
tightening torques
Find optimum tightening torque at a
radius of 2mm and without re-tightening
• Optimization
Optimum including re-tightening
Optimum without re-tightening
Radius: 1 – 2.2mm
Hexa
go
n h
ea
d fa
ils
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 15
Outline
• Validated virtual development
Overview simulation methods
General remarks to the CAE-process
Structure & Durability: Technical & process tasks
• Application examples
Stiffness based multi-objective optimization of a car body section
Strength based design of a composite high pressure tank
Damage based shape optimization of a threaded tank valve component
under pulsating pressure
• Summary / Outlook
June 2014 Falkner, Kepplinger, Schmalhofer MSE_AUT Disclosure or duplication without consent is prohibited 16
Success-story – Validated virtual development
time
com
ple
xity
Pushing the limits
-6 Months*
* faster time to market
-4 Months*
-6 Months*
-5 Months*
-4 Months*