SCORE@F. c. Gérard... · 11 SCORE@F –HELMOND the 17th November 2011 Versailles Satory Test...

25
1 The French FOT for road co-operative systems Date : 17/11/2011 Place : TNO HELMOND Author: G.SEGARRA (RENAULT) SCORE@F Système Coopératif Routier Expérimentation @ France

Transcript of SCORE@F. c. Gérard... · 11 SCORE@F –HELMOND the 17th November 2011 Versailles Satory Test...

1

The French FOT for road

co-operative systems

Date : 17/11/2011

Place : TNO – HELMOND

Author: G.SEGARRA (RENAULT)

SCORE@FSystème Coopératif Routier Expérimentation

@ France

2SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

• Duration: 30 months

• Start: 1° September 2010

• Total Budget: 5.6 M€

• Support: 2.7 M€

• Competitiveness Pole: MOV’EO

• 20 Partners

• Experiment on motorway and Urban /

Rural environment in Yvelines department.

SUMMARY

3SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

LEADER

Automobile Road Infrastructure

Telecom & Services

Research Institutes

PARTNERSHIP

IFSTTAR

CETE

SO

CETE

IdF

4SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

DRIVE C2X TEST SITE

Coop TS FinlandTampere, Finland

Level 2

SPITSHelmond, Netherlands

Level 1

SISCOGAGalicia, Spain

Level 3

SCORE@FYvelines, France

Level 2

Test Site ItalyBrenner Motorway, Italy

Level 2

simTD

Frankfurt/Main, GermanyLevel 2

SAFERGothenburg, Sweden

Level 2

5SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

SATORY

Test Circuit

D91 (Urban / Rural)

N12

Motorway

A86

6

3

3

6Versailles

City

30

PARIS

Technology Center

TEST SITE 1 (Main):

Yvelines - Versailles

6SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

10

TEST SITE 2:

Orleans - Janville

7SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

ROAD SAFETY USE CASES

(Based on ETSI TS 101 539

Standard)

Time

PRIMARY ROAD SAFETY SECONDARY

Information Awareness Warning Direct

Action

on

Vehicle

Pre

crash

Post

crash

< 1sec

Between 1 and 3 Sec

Between 2 and 6 Sec

Between 6 and 30 Sec

TIME TO COLLISION (TTC) - ACCORDING TO SUBJECT VEHICLE SPEED

CAA

In-Vehicle

Signage

TERTIARY

PERCEPTIONACTION

Human Electronic

Emergency

RescueLCRW

ICRW

7

• Road work, Signal violation

• Traffic Jam, Dangerous lane.

• Stationary, Wrong way driving

• Human on road, Third party

• Low stability, obstacle

8SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

CAM

DENM

Transfer pre-processed CAM & DENM

Contextual Speed Limits

In-Vehicle Signage

Traffic Info & Recommended Itineraries

DATEX 2 RSU

Traffic Management

Center

TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

9SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

Traffic Lights Use Cases

(Signal Violation & Stop - Start)

Driver HMISignal Phase

& Timing (SPAT) +

Intersection

Topology

Signal Violation

Driver HMI

Brake

Audio

Alert

Brake

Audio

Alert

10SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

MOBILITY & COMFORT

POI Notification and local electronic commerce

Electric Vehicle Charging Spot Notification

Public Transport Event Notification

Electronic hitch hiking notification

Visitor Internet Access Point Notification

Possibility to reserve and pay services

Citizen /

Commercial

RSU

11SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

Versailles Satory Test System

3G

DRIVE C2X

Central

StoreData Analysis

Test Site

Store

(10 TB)

LOG

STATION

TEST SCENARIO

Server & Monitor

USB

Key

TEST SITE ASSESSMENT TOOL

Logging

Profiles

Scenarios

for Controlled

Assessments

Drivers

Comm.

Channel

Emulator

Modems under test

WAVE Modems Test Bench

Selected Modems:

• COHDA / NXP

• DENSO

VERSAILLES SATORY

Assessment System

12SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

ASSESSMENT PURPOSE

Technical assessment of critical road safety

applications (calibration) in controlled

environment

Conformance Testing, Interoperability,

performance testing.

Driver Behaviour in controlled and natural

environment.

Driver acceptance and customer value

Organizational impact (life cycle management /

Security).

Cross exchange of assessment results with other

DRIVE C2X National FOT

13SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

VALIDATION PROCESS

Conformance Interoperability Performance

Layers’

Specifications

Applications

Profiles

Applications

Requirements

Functional

Operational

Software /

Hardware

Components

Products System

14SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE

V2V

V2I

NETWORK

G5

3G

Traffic Management

Center

Nomadic

Device

Mobility

Servers

System

Life Cycle

Management

• Security (1609-2)

• Communication

• Applications

• Performances

RSU

HTTP /

IPv6

15SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

INTEROPERABILITY

APPLICATIONAPPLICATION PROFILE

MESSAGE TRANS NET ACCESS CHANNEL

ROAD SAFETYCAM / DENM

New versionBTP GEONET

802.11p

ETSICCH

TRAFFIC DATADATEX 2

(CEN)TCP IP 3G

CONTEXTUAL

SPEEDSAM (ETSI) BTP GEONET 802.11p CCH

CSM (CEN) BTP GEONET 802.11p SCH1

IN-VEHICLE

SIGNAGESAM (ETSI) BTP GEONET 802.11p CCH

IVSM (CEN) BTP GEONET 802.11p SCH1

TRAFFIC

LIGHTSSAM (ETSI) BTP GEONET 802.11p CCH

SPAT + IT BTP GEONET 802.11p SCH1

POI

NOTIFICATIONSAM (ETSI) BTP GEONET 802.11p CCH

POINM (ETSI) BTP GEONET 802.11p SCH3

16SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

PERFORMANCES:

End to End Latency Time

Application /

FacilitiesChange

Sampling

Time + Time + Time + Time + Time

Originator Receiving

Commu-

nication

Commu-

nicationAIR

(PER)

Application /

Facilities

End to End Latency time

17SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

APPLICATION LATENCY

Relationship between

messages frequency and latency

Time of Collision

DENM

CAN Messages

50 ms

DENM Messages

(2 Hertz) Part of latency time

500 ms

Airbag

Triggered

3 seconds

18SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

PERFORMANCES:

Positioning Accuracy

Longitudinal Alignment (Forward & Frontal

collision risk warning)

3 m 2 m

Lateral shift error of 2 meters

Actual Target vehicle position

Perceived Target vehicle positionSubject

Vehicle

Relative positioning accuracy shall be better than 1.5 m

False

Positive

Warning

19SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

PERFORMANCES:

Positioning Accuracy

Longitudinal Alignment (Forward & Frontal

collision risk warning)

3 m1 m

Lateral shift error of 1 meters

Actual Target vehicle position

Perceived Target vehicle positionSubject

Vehicle

Relative positioning accuracy shall be better than 1 m (according

to vehicles’ widths)

False

Positive

Warning

20SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

PERFORMANCES:

Positioning Accuracy

- Adding «position in lane»

Subject

Vehicle

Right Hard Shoulder or road side0

1

2

3

Vehicle position in lane only provided if:

Positioning accuracy not guaranteed (confidence level)

Confidence in lane positioning > 95%

21SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

ANNEXES

22SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

In-Vehicle Implementation

OEM HMI Presentation Infos

User instructions

Navigation control

BUS (Bluetooth…)

TCUOEM Interface

CSL VMS TIRI P&R OTS EVCSNS-S TL

UMTS IEEE 802.11n IEEE 802.11p

COMMUNICATION

PROTOCOLS

MESSAGES

MANAGEMENT

LDM

MANAGEMENT

GPS

CANI

SECURITY

MANAGEMENT

LDMCAN

RTMAPMAPVLANE

APPLI

DATA

LOG

USB KEY

CAA / LCRW / ICRW

Androïd Tablet

Slippery Road

at 300 meters

23SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

Services Management

SAM

Need

Service

Via G5 + 3G + Internet

Via 3G + Internet

Vehicle RSUMobility services

Service request to server

Service Request

Service response

Service response

Session EstablishmentService Request

Need

Services

Local Services infoLocal Services info

24SCORE@F – HELMOND the 17th November 2011

TIME

ACTIVITY

2010-09-01 2011-09-01 2012-09-01 2013-03-01

SPECIFICATIONS

TS1 Assessment

TS2 Assessment

DEVELOPMENT /

INTEGRATION

ITS-S QUALIFICATION

In SATORY Controlled

Environment

In Natural Environment

Helmond

10Q4 11Q1 11Q2 11Q3 11Q4 12Q1 12Q2

Critical Road Safety

Application Validation

12Q3 12Q4 13Q1

PLANNING

25

[email protected]

RENAULT Connectivity

Advanced Engineering

Thank you