RePart #6.4M.Temp1
Transcript of RePart #6.4M.Temp1
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
1/33
ALBERT W. L. MOORE, JR.ATTORNEY AT LAW
Central Professional Building
221 West Lexington, Suite 114
Independence, Missouri 64050-3719
816.461.0993Telefacsimile: 816.461.3231
Email:[email protected]
MEMORANDUM
DATE: 1 December 2010
TO: Select Recipients
FROM: Albert W. L. Moore, Jr.
SUBJECT: Obama II Constitutional Qualification
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN
Stanley Armour Dunham so wanted a first born son that he named his
daughter, born 29 November 1942, Stanley - Stanley Ann, as a concession to her
gender. On 4 August 1961, he had his hearts desire in Honolulu, a first born son
by an obliging predominantly Polynesian wahine. This does not necessarily mean
that Stanley Armour had an extramarital affair. Artificial insemination and in vitro
fertilization techniques to produce male offspring were presumably known in 1961.
Stanley Armours wife Madelyn might have acquiesced in the procedure. To give
the bastard baby boy legitimacy and keep him in the family, he was adopted by
Stanley Armours daughter Stanley Ann and his friend Barack Hussein Obama, an
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected] -
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
2/33
alien Luo tribesman, who joined in platonic matrimonial union and dubbed their
adopted child Barack Hussein Obama II.
To give further cover to the illegitimate birth, Stanley Ann left the island
during gestation and birth to conceal the fact that she was not pregnant. A story
was concocted that she had gone to Kenya for laying in and giving birth. When she
divorced Obama the Luo a couple of years later, a birth certificate had to be
submitted to the divorce court. A phony Kenyan birth certificate was made an
exhibit in the court proceeding (and withdrawn in normal course). This gave
another layer of cover to the Hawaiian adoption of the son born out of wedlock.
The Kenyan birth myth waxed and waned according to its utility. It might
have been useful in obtaining Barrys admission to university, and procuring
student aid for him. Later, it was politically useful in garnering votes and
portraying opponents as racists. When Barry started running for the Office of
President, the Kenyan birth myth became an embarrassment, because foreign birth
prevented one from being a natural born citizen. Hence the myth was suppressed.
Not everybody got the word; see the attached. The certification of live birth was
offered to prove place of birth. Unfortunately, it also showed an alien father,
Obama the black Luo tribesman.
- 2 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
3/33
Currently, the Kenyan birth myth is used by Barry as a diversion, to distract
the public and officials from the real citizenship issue, Barrys loss of U.S.
citizenship after his birth. As the evidence will show that Barry was a natural born
citizen at birth, it is necessary to explore officially the substantial probability that
he lost U.S. citizenship after birth. There is a limit to what can be discovered by
amateur sleuths. The natural tendency is to examine birth initially and most
carefully, because natural born status can be acquired only at birth. But this status
can be lost thereafter.
The Obama cabal teases, taunts and disinforms the people with suggestions
of Kenyan birth, sometimes in the guise of scorned birthers to confuse, mislead
and distract the people from the true issues, secure in the knowledge that a Kenyan
birth can not be proved because it did not happen. DNA analysis would prove that
it could not have happened because it was biologically impossible; that line of
inquiry has been obstructed, but not foreclosed.
From the start of my analysis, Ive tried to take nothing for granted, not even
Barrys alleged parents. Although I frequently request it, nobody has furnished
scientific evidence that Barry is the son of Stanley Ann and Obama the black Luo
tribesman, and Im confident that genetic analysis will prove that its biologically
impossible for him to be the son of either.
- 3 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
4/33
Genetic genealogy has become routine. Near-conclusive evidence for
disproving Stanley Ann and Obama the Luo as parents would be Barrys DNA. I
would expect it to disclose that his mother was of a haplogroup inconsistent with
Stanley Anns, and his father of a haplogroup inconsistent with that of his
purported father, Obama the alien black Luo tribesman.
More specifically, comparison of Barrys mitochondrial DNA with that of a
descendant in the female line from one of his purported ascendants in the female
line would prove - or more likely disprove - that Stanley Ann was his mother. A
famous recent example of this technique is the identification of remains of the late
Tsarina and her children, brutally murdered by Russian communists. The Tsarina
was a daughter of a daughter of Queen Victoria. Mitochondrial DNA from the
remains was compared with mitochondrial DNA from Prince Philip, who also
descends in the female line from Queen Victoria. They matched.
At least one purveyor of genetic genealogical analysis now claims to be able
to trace descent without limitation to gender.
Every child of a given mother receives mitochondrial DNA exclusively from
the mother. Each child of that mother, regardless of gender or father, has identical
mitochondrial DNA, which is transmitted only through the female line.
Comparison of Barrys mitochondrial DNA with that of his claimed maternal half-
- 4 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
5/33
sister Maya Soetoro-Ng would prove or disprove Stanley Ann as his mother,
assuming that Maya really is Stanley Anns daughter. But nothing can be too
readily assumed in this analysis. Stanley Ann died of ovarian cancer, which raises
a question whether she was ever pregnant, as pregnancy seems to ward off ovarian
cancer. Hence it might be necessary to double-check Barrys maternal ancestry as
the Tsarinas remains were identified, by finding a descendant in the female line
from claimed ancestors in the female line through his claimed mother, Stanley
Ann.
Ideally, Barrys descent from Stanley Ann could be proved or disproved by
comparison of his mitochondrial DNA with the mitochondrial DNA of Stanley
Ann. But Barry has cremated her remains and cast the ashes into the sea. Failing
that, one might check the mitochondrial DNA of Stanley Anns mother Madelyn,
but lo and behold Madelyn suddenly up and died, and her remains were cremated
and cast into the sea. Thus the most readily available sources of comparative
mitochondrial DNA to verify - or more likely to disprove - Stanley Ann as Barrys
birth mother appear to have been lost forever. (One might get around this apparent
destruction of evidence if one could find envelopes sealed or stamped, or both, by
the tongue of Stanley Ann or Madelyn.)
- 5 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
6/33
The reliability of the tests in the purported female line above Maya might be
tested by repeated comparisons with different available female-line descendants
from female-line ancestors of Stanley Ann and Madelyn, to obtain confirmation
beyond reasonable scientific doubt that Maya and Barry are children of Stanley
Ann - or, more likely, that Barry is not her son and, less likely, that Maya is not her
daughter.
The disposals of Stanley Anns and Madelyns remains were reported on a
main stream media internet site, which allowed readers comments. When I
commented that they put out of reach mitochondrial DNA that might disprove the
claim that Madelyn and Stanley Ann were Barrys grandmother and mother, the
comment was purged in a second, two at the most. This suggests to me a word-
search program to delete automatically such a comment, which reflects a strong
sensitivity to what genetic analysis could prove or disprove. Suspicion was further
heightened by reports that everything touched by Barry in public outings is bagged
and carried away. These events and circumstances might be due in part to attempts
to prevent intelligence agencies from obtaining Barrys epithelials, but they also
strongly suggest a long-standing plan to obstruct scientific disproval of his claimed
parents by genetic analysis. The latter inference is reinforced by other events and
circumstances suggesting the same motive.
- 6 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
7/33
Similarly, Barrys Y-DNA could be compared with the Y-DNA of some of
the many known sons of Barack Hussein Obama. Y-DNA mutates more than
mitochondrial DNA. These mutations create markers that can help prove or
disprove ancestry in the male line. Some of these purported sons might find
themselves to be, in fact, sons of other fathers, particularly if Barack Hussein
Obama the black Luo tribesman was, on occasion, off drinkin and left his current
woman alone. Barry is almost certainly among those whose Y-DNA would not
have the markers of Barack Hussein Obama the black Luo tribesman. But Barry
would be the real outlier, with a father who is not even in Obama the Luos genetic
haplogroup.
It might not be necessary to cast the genetic research net quite so wide in
disproving Barrys claimed birth parents, if Barrys vital records, showing his
recorded birth parents, are disclosed. One could then concentrate on confirming
identified parental prospects. Even with birth parents identified of record, however,
genetic analysis is necessary to confirm that Barry is really the son of the birth
parents named in the original birth certificate or otherwise identifiable.
Identification of the mother is relatively certain; she has to be there for the birth.
Hopefully she is still alive or has relatives or friends who could furnish DNA
samples. There is, of course, the possibility that a false name of the alleged father
- 7 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
8/33
was given to the birth attendants. If a face can not be put to the putative birth
fathers name in the original birth certificate, the Y-DNA of Stanley Armour
Dunham should be researched to verify the hypothesis that his seed grew this plant.
A strong but scientifically inconclusive clue, which might prove out genetically,
comes from Dunham family snaps of Barry and Stanley Armour at the beach
around 1965, both facing the camera. Barry is the spitting image of Stanley
Armour, with particular respect to the long pointy chin.
If we hypothesize that Stanley Ann and Obama the Luo can be genetically
disproved as Barrys parents, how do we account for their names on Barrys
notorious certification of live birth?
Assume that Hawaiis certification of live birth is true and official as far as
it goes. Assume also that Dr. Fukino is honest. These assumptions are reasonable
and verifiable. Im not persuaded by kneejerk reactions that the COLB is a forgery
and Dr. Fukino a liar, even though shes a Democrat. If Barrys birth parents were
indeed Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama the alien Luo tribesman,
a prima facie case would be made out that Barry was not a natural born U.S.
citizen, because Obama the Luo tribesman was an alien. The original birth
certificate would be strong evidence that Barry was a natural born U.S. citizen, but
not black.
- 8 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
9/33
It has recently been claimed that Hawaii is the only state to receive from the
Democratic National Committee in 2008 the traditional certificate of constitutional
eligibility with the certificate of nomination. The spin is that this is simply because
Hawaii was the only state requiring such certification by law. I suspect, without
knowing, that the DNC sent a certificate of nomination without the eligibility
certificate initially, whereupon the Hawaiian authorities asked the local
Democratic leaders to certify eligibility.
The local Democrats, perhaps being aware of the Kenyan birth myth, might
have demanded to see a birth certificate. Dr. Fukino could have pushed the
envelope by producing an amended birth certificate. She might have been asked for
a view of the original. She would have declined, realizing that events had already
come too close to disclosing an adoption. Or a scholarly Democrat might have
overlooked the word Amended under her thumb and, taking the adoptive parents
to be birth parents, concluded that Barry could not have been a natural born U.S.
citizen because his father was an alien, and declined to certify eligibility. (And it
could even be imagined, as an extremely remote possibility redolent of a Victorian
novel, that local Democratic refusal to certify stemmed from knowledge that Barry
disrespected his native Hawaiian mother by pretending to have another.)
- 9 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
10/33
After local refusal, the speculation would run, the DNC certified to Hawaii
the constitutional eligibility of Barry that was denied to the 49 other states. (An
episode something like this, if it occurred, might have given rise to the rumor that
Hawaii has no birth certificate for Barry. This is unlikely, as an original birth
certificate would be required to guard against future marriages illegal on grounds
of consanguinity.)
It is long overdue for Congress and the states to conduct exhaustive
investigations into precisely what happened in connection with Barrys 2008
campaign, to confirm eligibility at birth and to determine whether eligibility was
lost thereafter by loss of citizenship. The states should take the lead. They elect the
President. They determine who goes on the ballot. Article II Section 1 provides
that each state appoints presidential electors in such manner as the legislature
thereof may determine. Investigation and appropriate legislation are within each
states legislative jurisdiction and constitutional duty.
The certification of live birth is ambiguous. This ambiguity arises from its
nature; it is an abstract of information from a document on file. However, the
document on file could be an original birth certificate naming birth parents, or it
could be an amended birth certificate reflecting adoptive parents.
- 10 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
11/33
When a child is adopted, an amended birth certificate is created naming the
adoptive parents. This creates an official fiction that they are the birth parents.
Recently, 23 September 2010, a lady came into my law office. A close relative of
hers was adopted and had shown her the relatives original and amended birth
certificate.
This scenario is consistent with the hypothesis that DNA evidence would
disprove Stanley Ann and Obama the Luo as Barrys parents, and confirm the birth
parents named in the original Hawaiian birth certificate. (If the birth father named
in the original birth certificate can not be genetically confirmed, DNA might prove
Stanley Armour as the birth father; its possible that the true identity of the father
was misrepresented to the hospital or birth attendant).
And thats why parents named in Hawaiis certification of live birth are not
the birth parents, and private inquiries, demands and petitions will not bring
clarification. Dr. Fukino and the vital records must be subpoenaed, and birth
parents of record must be verified by genetic analysis.
Again, Hawaiis certification of Mr. Obamas live birth in Hawaii is
intentionally ambiguous with regard to the identity of his birth parents. By design,
it is impossible to tell from the certification whether the purported parents named
therein are Mr. Obamas birth parents or his adoptive parents. This is to keep
- 11 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
12/33
adoptions confidential. Furnishing an amended certificate would tip the observer to
an adoption. Hawaiis custodian of vital records is barred by law from divulging
the adoption without the adoptees consent, or pursuant to legal process.
However, in July 2009, Dr. Chiyome Leinaala Fukino, director of the
Hawaii State Department of Health, issued a statement by which she goes about as
close to the brink as she can, without violating her legal obligation to keep the
adoption confidential, to say that Barry was adopted. Her statement is quoted in the
bookThe Manchurian Presidenton page 76, and below:
I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawai'i State Department of
Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the
Hawai'i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama
was born in Hawai'i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have
nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement
issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.
Its amusing that the authors of that highly informative book The
Manchurian President fail to pick up on Dr. Fukinos effort to disclose Mr.
Obamas adoption without violating legal restraints; they say on page 77 that her
statement told us nothing new. In fact, it cracks the case.
Dr. Fukinos statement refers to Barry's "vital records" in the plural. He was
not dead, so she must be referring to two birth certificates, the original that named
birth parents and an amended certificate naming adoptive parents. Moreover, data
in the certification of live birth must have been taken from the amended certificate,
- 12 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
13/33
for Dr. Fukino also says that the records verify that Barry is a "natural born
American citizen." If the original birth certificate showed Obama the Luo to be a
birth parent, it would have proved the opposite, that Barry was not a natural born
citizen.
Dr. Fukino is very clever. She has hinted strongly that Barry was adopted
without explicitly disclosing an adoption, which would be unlawful. She has also
let us know that Barry's birth parents were U.S. citizens, which excludes Obama
the Luo tribesman as a birth parent and makes baby Barry a natural born U.S.
citizen at birth. (This leaves open the possibility that he lost American citizenship
thereafter.)
Barrys vital records must be disclosed and genetic analysis run to confirm
the birth parents of Barack Hussein Obama II, and to confirm that Barry, pretender
to the Office of President, is actually the child whose birth was recorded, not a
ringer filling in for the actual birth child.
But if, as seems highly probable, Barrys production of his DNA and his
vital records prove that, at birth, he was a natural born U.S. citizen, why would he
refuse to confirm it by his original birth certificate? He might maintain that it
would be to avoid family scandal and damage to the reputations of others, or to
- 13 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
14/33
prevent the disclosure of his own illegitimate origins. In all probability, however,
there are two main reasons:
- First, neither of Barrys birth parents is of recent African origin. His whole
political career has been based on being the son of a black Luo tribesman, with kith
n kin in todays Africa. His gross misrepresentation that he is black is arguably
election fraud. An American black told Laura Ingraham on the radio the other day
that a black will forgive one many a fault if he's black. Wonder what they would
think of him if he is, for example, the son of a Caucasian father and a
predominantly Polynesian mother, with perhaps Portagee overtones, who just
pretends to be black for meretricious political purposes, never mind that it destroys
the career of a patriotic American Army officer.
In the Court Martial of LTC Terry Lakin, the White House has threatened
reprisal against the member or members of the Court Martial if Dr. Fukino is
subpoenaed and Hawaiis vital records produced. This tends to confirm that there
are such records, and that they show birth to U.S. citizen parents, neither of whom
is black. Thus Barry shows that he will carry through with his destruction of LTC
Lakin by withholding his original birth certificate, even though its disclosure
- 14 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
15/33
would show Barry to be a natural born U.S. citizen at the time of birth. More than
that, he will unlawfully corrupt the military justice system to prevent the
disclosure, thereby denying a zealous defense.
The importance to Barry of the charade that he is black should not be
underestimated. He has used it to con blacks and sympathetic people of all shades
to vote for him, while enabling him (often through proxies) to denigrate opponents
as racists. The significance of this fraud is shown by (1) the fact that some 95% of
blacks voted for Barry in 2008 (2) his refusal to disclose his DNA or vital records,
which would be strong evidence that he was a natural born citizen at birth but
would also disclose that he can not truthfully claim the distinction of being the son
of a black Luo tribesman (3) his release of his otherwise confidential census return,
in which he claimed to be black (4) his political manifesto Dreams from my
Father, subtitledA Story of Race and Inheritance and (5) Aaron Klein's book with
Brenda J. Elliott, The Manchurian President, which spells out Barrys cynical use
of his false racial heritage to build his political career.
Im constrained to wonder whether black compatriots would be moved to
despise Barry for duping them about his racial heritage and continuing the charade
even though it is about to destroy LTC Lakins career and disrupt Americas
political life, or feel complimented that Barry would want to identify with them,
- 15 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
16/33
pretend to be black, and recognize the power of American blacks as a political
bloc. In light of his conduct, many American blacks might feel relief that Barry is
not black. But they should know all of the facts, so they can make their own
analysis and draw their own conclusions. Barry might cut his losses with American
blacks by making a clean breast of things, particularly when he might thereby save
the military career of LTC Lakin.
- Secondly, the Kenyan birth myth and other false notions about Barrys birth and
its constitutional consequences divert attention from his real citizenship problems,
the probable loss of his U.S. citizenship by forfeiture, disclaimer, renunciation,
sedition, some combination of the foregoing, or otherwise. Barry is trying to
replicate the experience of Chester Alan Arthur, who was helped, in diverting
attention from the fact that his father William was not yet a U.S. citizen when
Chester was born, by false charges that Chester himself was born outside the U.S.
Similarly, Barry can divert attention from his loss of citizenship after birth, which
can probably be proved against him, by focusing controversy on his natural born
citizenship at birth, which he can probably prove in his favor (albeit at the expense
of the myth that he is black).
- 16 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
17/33
Even if it be found upon further inquiry that Barry did not lose U.S.
citizenship, investigation of this possibility would probably have collateral
benefits, such as the following:
- proof of obstruction of justice by the destruction, forgery, alteration or
sequestration of evidence of Barrys citizenship status in Indonesia, Pakistan and
the United States. Bribery is possible, especially in Indonesia and Pakistan. Rich
space contracts to Indonesia might be in large part consideration for Indonesian
complicity in the corruption of its official records relating to Barrys citizenship.
- proof of massive illegal campaign contributions to Barry from Indonesia and
other foreign sources.
-proof of fraud in Barrys applications for admission to university and scholarship
aid, such as affirmations of foreign birth and foreign citizenship.
- proof of incitement to insubordination and mutiny by U.S. military officers
through false representations that make aprima facie case that Barry was not at the
time of his birth a natural born U.S. citizen, thus giving the officers reasonable
grounds for believing that orders to them were not lawful. Moreover, Barry and his
claque threaten the resulting Court Martial with reprisal if it subpoenas Dr. Fukino
and Hawaiis vital records, although the original birth certificate is material and
- 17 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
18/33
relevant to the accused officers defense. If the original birth certificate shows
Barry was not a natural born citizen (highly unlikely) the order was void in fact. If
it shows Barry was a natural born citizen at birth (highly likely) then Barry has
seduced and ensnared the accused into mutiny and insubordination by withholding
strong evidence of his eligibility while creating on the public record a prima facie
case of ineligibility by reviving the Kenyan birth myth and falsely representing that
he had an alien father.
- insight into the recent activities of the Comintern, which could include Barrys
recruitment as an agent.
- other high crimes and misdemeanors making Barry liable to impeachment.
- relatively minor in the current context, but still important, correction of Barrys
lineage by the United States Senate Historical Office.
LOSS OF ELIGIBILITY
Arguably, Barrys status as a natural born citizen was lost the day he was
born, with his adoption by Stanley Ann and the alien Luo, although he remained a
citizen by birth in the United States under the 14th
Amendment. It is said that an
adoptive parent becomes a parent for all legal purposes. While superficially
plausible, it seems unlikely that natural born status is lost by Obama the Luos
adoption of Barry. If this proposition were accepted, it would probably be
- 18 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
19/33
revisited, and perhaps reversed, when a later case arose of a foreigner born abroad
to aliens and adopted at birth by American parents. Become a natural born citizen
by adoption? Surely not. Decision on this point could be avoided if it were found
that Barry later lost citizenship; it would not then matter whether eligibility was
lost, without loss of citizenship, by reason of an alien adoptive parent on 4 August
1961.
Conclusive proof that Barry was not a natural born citizen - as by competent
proof he was born abroad, or the son of an alien father - would conclude the
eligibility inquiry. He could not thereafter acquire the natural born citizen status.
But incontrovertible proof that Barry was a natural born citizen at birth is not
just an end, but a signal to start investigating loss of citizenship, for the status of
natural born citizen can be lost after birth. This is a subject that is at least as
important as natural born status at birth, and in this case far more difficult to
investigate.
While the status of natural born U.S. citizen under Article II Section 1 can
only be acquired at birth, it may be lost thereafter. The term natural born citizen
subsumes citizen. You can not be a natural born citizen if youre no t a citizen at
all, even if you were a natural born citizen at birth.
- 19 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
20/33
The issue of whether Barry lost U.S. citizenship by forfeiture, disclaimer,
renunciation, sedition, some combination of the foregoing or otherwise, is not
resolved by proving Barry was a natural born citizen at birth. In fact, as indicated,
proof of natural born status at birth raises the issue whether that status was later
lost. In Barrys case, there is ample reason to inquire whether Barry lost his U.S.
citizenship.
Barry might have lost U.S. citizenship by being moved to Indonesia by his
purported mother with custodial rights over him at the age of six or seven. If he did
not lose U.S. citizenship under U.S. law, there is a substantial possibility he lost it
by reason of becoming an Indonesian citizen. There being no dual citizenship
between the United States and Indonesia, acquisition of one citizenship terminates
the other.
Definitive proof of Indonesian citizenship of a minor could be hard to come
by. Ones citizenship status in a foreign law context is not necessarily so well
defined as in the American system (where, for all that, its murky enough). I spent
a year and a half on a Portuguese island, and have the impression that adoption in
the formal sense was then unknown or rarely used; the Portuguese love children
and have close supportive families and extended families. A child in need or left
- 20 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
21/33
alone would be immediately taken up informally and raised by extended family or
friends, or whoever was available; the church might play a role.
Although my experience in Indonesia was corporate and commercial, a
minor child of a wife in Muslim society is liable to be deemed, like the wife, the
property of the husband and by implication an Indonesian citizen, without the need
of extensive naturalization proceedings. Not the paper trail found in the U.S. Thus
an exhaustive review and analysis of U.S. and Indonesian law and practice, as well
as highly detailed factual discovery, would be required to determine whether Barry
lost U.S. citizenship as a result of his being moved to Indonesia and his later
conduct in that connection.
Even if, under current law, Barry could regain U.S. citizenship after
becoming Indonesian, it would seem that he would be a naturalized U.S. citizen,
not a natural born citizen under Article II Section 1.
Indonesian officials might have been working with the Obama cabal for a
long time to obscure Barrys Indonesian citizenship, very possibly at the expense
of American interests and taxpayers. During the time I was active in Indonesia, I
read an estimate by an American economist that 20-25% of Indonesian gross
national product was graft. Illicit private fortunes in the billions of dollars have
been made in the exploitation of Indonesias natural resources, primarily
- 21 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
22/33
petroleum. Against this background, it was no surprise to read recent reports on the
internet that records of Barrys citizenship status in Indonesia were deleted,
secreted, forged and otherwise corrupted as part of a corrupt deal to conceal his
status as an Indonesian citizen. I cant prove it, but its an investigative lead.
It would come as no surprise to learn that American plans to grant lucrative
space contracts to Indonesian interests are consideration, not only for the stated
reason of Islamic outreach, but also for the corruption of Indonesian records to
conceal Barrys acquisition of Indonesian citizenship. Even if it were eventually
decided that Barry did not lose U.S. citizenship, the criminal suppression of
evidence to the contrary through bribery on a grand scale at American taxpayer
expense could be among Barrys high crimes and misdemeanors warranting
impeachment. Even more so than in Watergate, the cover-up might be worse than
the underlying problem.
There is a slight chance that an unauthorized incursion into Barrys State
Department records led to the murder of a cooperating material witness in the
District of Columbia. Inquiry should be made into the circumstances of this case,
which seems to have gone cold.
- 22 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
23/33
The more one examines this matter, the stronger grows the suspicion that
further investigation would uncover not only more information about current
suspicions but also evidence giving rise to other serious concerns.
It is not generally realized how corrupt, ruthless and subversive is the
Obama cabal. It must be exposed. An exhaustive investigation of Barrys
constitutional eligibility would be an important part of that expose.
DANGERS TO THE REPUBLIC
If, as seems probable, Indonesia and other foreign countries and interests
(such as the Comintern) are aware of Barrys ineligibility to the Office of
President, and have possibly recruited him as a mole and sapper, the dangers to
American national security could hardly be overestimated. Already it appears that
Indonesia is set to siphon off American funds through the space program, and the
pretender to the Office of the President can do little to oppose this, even if he
wished to do so, for fear of being exposed as a traitor ineligible to the Office of
President. Other nations and interests may be in a similar position to manipulate
Barry in a way that is contrary to the interests of America and its people. In
addition to everything else, the Indonesian space venture is likely to be poorly run
if its part of a pay - off. I recall that decades ago Chrysler was a corrupt
- 23 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
24/33
company, and at that time its manufacturing quality and marketing were execrably
bad. An Indonesian space contract given as part of a pay-off for concealing Barrys
Indonesian citizenship, rather than technological merit, is liable to be mismanaged
as well.
Barrys position is similar to Lenins after the Germans inserted him into
Russia by sealed train to sap the Russian war effort.
The craven utterances of Republican officeholders in favor of bowing and
kowtowing to Barry are not reassuring. The interests of the American people are
not ordinarily to be found in accommodating Barry and his ilk in the interest of
getting things done. Barry has issued a call for hand to hand combat, which
trumps his typical doublespeak call to work together. Perhaps his challenge should
be answered by productive official inquiries. Americans need to stand strongly
against the Obama cabal, and full exposure of Barrys life history as it relates to his
citizenship and constitutional eligibility to the Office of President will show why.
It is not sufficiently well perceived that Barry is the chosen leader, front and
mouthpiece of a strong communist insurgency. He must be thoroughly investigated
and called to account for all anti-American activity, including possible loss of
citizenship rendering him liable for removal from the office to which he pretends,
- 24 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
25/33
and prosecution for all crimes committed in covering up a loss of U.S. citizenship,
stealing the 2008 election, and other high crimes and misdemeanors.
To identify and marshal evidence against Barry, in particular for fraud in
pretending eligibility to the Office of President, congressional leaders and officials
in each and every state should take immediate action to investigate in excruciating
detail Barrys origins and conduct with a view to rescission of the appointments of
his presidential electors by the states and a possible bill of impeachment by
Congress - not for policy differences, but for high crimes and misdemeanors in,
among other things, pretending to an office for which he is not eligible, inciting
mutiny and insubordination by misrepresentation of his ineligibility and his corrupt
interference for meretricious purposes in one or more Courts Martial to deny the
accused the zealous defense to which he is entitled, bribery of foreign officials
with American tax dollars on a massive scale to conceal his foreign citizenship,
and other high crimes and misdemeanors, known and as yet unknown. A fishing
expedition? Perhaps. But there are strong signs of fish.
RETROACTIVE REGULARIZATION?
One benefit of finding that Barry was in fact a natural born citizen at birth is
that the daunting prospect of a retroactive constitutional amendment to regularize
his incumbency can be avoided.
- 25 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
26/33
Could Barrys loss of U.S. citizenship be rectified by legal and diplomatic
revisions, perhaps retroactive ones? This might attract the support of patriotic
Democrats (should there be any) willing to uncover the truth and purge the
Democratic Party of corruption and sedition, while seeking to retain some vestige
of justification for retaining Barry in office and restoring a measure of civic calm
and constitutional government.
Striving mightily to keep Barry in a position of power is not an approach I
favor, but willingness to explore creative solutions might make a thorough
investigation more palatable to some who would otherwise resist. They might
argue, whether sincerely or not, that an effort should be made to preserve the
results of the 2008 election if any legal rationale, even a tortured one, could be
developed for doing so. Disclosure of all relevant facts might furnish a foundation
and pretext for dealing with Barrys citizenship problems as problems rather than
the result of evil conspiracy, even if they are, in fact, the result of evil conspiracy.
As an aside, the election of a make-believe black might be held up as a
negative example of the wisdom of evaluating a candidates character and
intentions instead of voting for the color of his skin and his racial heritage, which
in this case was fraudulent. Exposing Barrys racist appeal and agitation would be
in the nations best interests.
- 26 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
27/33
As an analogy to the regularization of Barrys tenure by legal modification,
one might pose the following: A member of Congress is constitutionally barred
from serving in an executive post, emoluments of which were increased while the
appointee was a member of Congress (U.S. Const. Art. I Sec. 6). The
compensation of the Secretary of State was increased while Hillary Clinton was a
member of the Senate. The constitutional bar was removed by repealing the
increase while confirming her appointment - although some dont agree that it
really was, for there was still, literally, an increase in emolument while she was in
the Senate.
In a similar way, it might be possible to regularize Barrys constitutional
status and eliminate the bar to his exercising the Office of President, by retroactive
legislation and diplomatic agreement. It's a common misconception that retroactive
legislation is unconstitutional, because of confusion with the much-hated and
universally prohibited ex post facto crime (U.S. Const. Art. I Sec. 9, Sec. 10).
Arguably (though it would not persuade me) Barry's U.S. citizenship could
be patched by retroactive legislation and diplomatic agreement with Indonesia
allowing citizens of each country to acquire citizenship in the other without losing
the original citizenship. This would be analogous to the recent change in
relationship between Canada and the U.S., in which Canadians who had become
- 27 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
28/33
naturalized U.S. citizens could retain their Canadian citizenship, even though they
had forfeited the original Canadian citizenship when naturalized in the United
States.
A comparable change in U.S. - Indonesian relations should not be allowed
before all the facts are on the table. And if there turns out to have been a corrupt
bargain involving massive bribery at U.S. taxpayers expense to conceal Barrys
Indonesian citizenship, the retroactive dual citizenship patch as a cure for Barrys
eligibility problems should be rejected. It would seem the better view that Barrys
constitutional qualification must be determined by the law at the time he ran, was
elected and purported to serve. However, willingness to consider a retroactive
dual-citizenship arrangement, without prematurely committing to it, might be
considered as part of a final resolution, if it would attract broader support for a
truly exhaustive investigation, with a starting budget of a billion dollars.
RULE OF LAW
Even if Barry stood for everything I hold dear in society and governance, I
would object to his election and tenure in office as unconstitutional. But the lust
for power of Barry and his ilk, their adoption of reactionary and discredited foreign
philosophies of people as subjects instead of citizens, and their willingness to serve
- 28 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
29/33
foreign powers and interests, should alarm all who truly care for the United States
of America.
The framers of the Constitution did not lightly make it a part of the
fundamental law that the President must be a natural born U.S. citizen. Like every
part of the Constitution, it was thoroughly debated and explicated. At about the
time when the Constitution was being drafted, Poland was being ravaged and
partitioned, partly because foreigners were constantly brought in to rule it. The
first partition was on 5 August 1772, when the American movement for
independence was germinating. Polish patriots like Thaddeus Kosciusko and
Casimir Pulaski fought for the American patriots in the American Revolution.
Pulaski, the father of American cavalry died from wounds received in an
American cavalry charge. The Poles must have conveyed to the Americans what
had happened to Poland, and there were other sources of such news.
And Americans, who had developed a national sense and referred to
themselves as Americans after a century or so of life as English colonists, knew of
rule by colonial governors who either were not born in the lands they were to
govern, or were appointed by a king who was not. The wisdom of a natural born
U.S. citizen as President becomes daily more apparent as the administration of a
probably illegal alien unfolds.
- 29 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
30/33
Barry seems to have become alienated from his native land, if indeed he ever
cared for it. He has adopted an utterly ruthless and anti-American communist
ideology. The suspicion that his allegiance is not to the United States and that he
has ceased to be a citizen of the United States needs to be honestly and
exhaustively investigated, in the hope it might be allayed but in the realization that
it might be verified. I believe that impeachment will lie against a pretender to the
Office of President, who usurps the badges and apparent authority of the office
without eligibility or without true allegiance to the United States or the intention of
complying with his oath of office. If impeachment be considered an admission
Barry is President, so be it, but then by the same token he becomes subject to
impeachment. He should not benefit from his own wrong in fraudulently
pretending to the Office of President while ineligible or unfaithful to it. He can not
acquire an immunity to removal from an office by the usurpation of its badges and
authority. That makes no sense.
FUNDAMENTAL TRUTH
There is a substantial contingent of egoistic megalomaniacs in America who
have little or no regard for the American system in part because they have not been
schooled in it or foolishly fancy themselves to be wiser than the Founders. They
erect Utopias in their minds, which are perfect, never having been tried, or they
- 30 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
31/33
have been tried and failed for some reasons deemed extraneous to the immaculate
conceptual model, which these self-proclaimed progressives in their wisdom will
avoid. And if problems arise in practice, it is because the subjects have failed to
obey as the omniscient masters have ordained. Such fancies are useful for
demagogues seeking power, who vociferously disparage real-life institutions,
whose imperfections can be seen in practice. It is not good for governance. The
perfect in theory is made enemy of the good - indeed, the best available, in
practice. In America, government without the consent of the governed will not
stand. It will not govern.
If the constitutional eligibility to the Office of President continues to be
ignored, by concealment of evidence that would prove or disprove constitutional
eligibility to that office, the American concepts of a constitutional republic and a
nation of law will be dealt a serious blow, from which the nation might never
recover.
- 31 -
-
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
32/33
http://caosblog.com/8013, accessed 10 November 2008 by AM:
6/12/2008 [Presumably the date of the posting. AM]
Kenyan-Born Obama?
By: Cao, Filed under:Obama@ 4:57 am
Maybe I am mis-reading what this really means.?
Obama turns the page of Americas history with 2008 nomination
By CHIDO NWANGWU. Special to USAfrica The Newspaper, Houston,
USAfricaonline.com and CLASS magazine and The Black Business Journal
I didnt make this photoshopit came to me through email from
USAfricaonline.com
I knew there were reasons why he wouldnt release his birth certificate,
althoughisnt a birth certificate public information?
http://caosblog.com/8013http://caosblog.com/8013http://caosblog.com/8013http://caosblog.com/8013http://caosblog.com/category/demonrats/obama-demonratshttp://caosblog.com/category/demonrats/obama-demonratshttp://caosblog.com/category/demonrats/obama-demonratshttp://caosblog.com/category/demonrats/obama-demonratshttp://caosblog.com/8013http://caosblog.com/8013 -
8/7/2019 RePart #6.4M.Temp1
33/33
Arent you supposed to be American-born to qualify for presidential office in the
US? [Not only American born, but of U.S. citizen parents AM]
Endhttp://caosblog.com/8013, accessed 10 November 2008.
http://caosblog.com/8013http://caosblog.com/8013http://caosblog.com/8013http://caosblog.com/8013