Political Economy of Development: South Africa since … · Introductory Observations: 1. Despite...

22
Presentation for : Harold Wolpe Conference: Re-Visiting The Political Economy of Social Change in Contemporary South Africa Political Economy of Development: South Africa since 1994 14 June, 2012, Liliesleaf Farm, Rivonia, Johannesburg By Dr Iraj Abedian Pan-African Investment & Research Services (Pty) Ltd.

Transcript of Political Economy of Development: South Africa since … · Introductory Observations: 1. Despite...

Presentation for : Harold Wolpe Conference:

Re-Visiting The Political Economy of Social Change in Contemporary South Africa

Political Economy of Development: South Africa since 1994

in Contemporary South Africa14 June, 2012,

Liliesleaf Farm, Rivonia, Johannesburg

By

Dr Iraj Abedian

Pan-African Investment & Research Services (Pty) Ltd.

Outline

� Introductory Observations

� 1994: The Starting Point Status

� Key Trends since 1994

Slide # 2

� Key Trends since 1994

� Concluding Remarks

Introductory Observations

Introductory Observations:

1. Despite 15 years of uninterrupted growth(1994-2008), the triple

evils of structural unemployment, widespread poverty, and gross

inequality persist.

2. Whilst considerable ‘poverty alleviation’ has taken place, the

systemic roots of poverty remain in place.

3. Whereas considerable and unprecedented wealth has been

Slide # 4

3. Whereas considerable and unprecedented wealth has been

created since 1994, the mal-distribution of income has worsened.

4. Despite the democratic nature of the government, the citizens’

discontent persists

5. SA’s current political economy configuration is unsustainable,

given that there is no credible solution offered.

6. Increasingly, the focus is more on the form than the substance.

1994: Starting Point Status

Note: Initial endowment matters a great deal.....

The Starting Point Status in 1994:

1. Macroeconomic conditions were dire with deep instability.

2. Fiscal stress, high inflation, high nominal interest rates, negative

forex reserves, low tax morality, rising public debt, and weak

revenue collection ability.

3. Global macro-financial conditions were volatile, but SA had

favourable support due to “ historic peaceful transition”.

Slide # 6

favourable support due to “ historic peaceful transition”.

4. Legitimate expectations of diverse groups soon translated into

contested moralities and interest groups’ claims and aspirations.

5. “Project Normalization” of the SA political economy began on the

platform of a tortured history laden with the remnants of

colonialism, racism and class struggle.

6. Ideological contestations were confronted by the obstinate reality.

The Overwhelming Macroeconomic Concern

Slide # 7

The Starting Point Status in 1994 (II):

7. The new government had high aspirations, considerable moral

and political authority, but little experience.

8. The state was fractured, technically unfit to cope with the

potential demands on its services.

9. Furthermore, the emerging constitutional dispensation was

foreign to the culture of all stakeholders, old and new!

Slide # 8

foreign to the culture of all stakeholders, old and new!

10. Institutionally, the entire framework had to be redesigned and

developed…

11. In short, SA was much like an airplane that had to be fixed during

flight! There was no luxury of time, or prior experience!

Key Trends Since 1994

Key Trends Since 1994

Pro-Poor Policies.....

Trends since 1994: Number of Welfare Grant Recipients

1000

3000

5000

7000

9000

11000

13000

15000

17000

Panel (a): Total Number of Grant and Pension Recipients ('000)

10

15

20

25

30

35

Panel b: Total Grant and Pension Recipients (as % of Population)

Slide # 11

-1000

19

96

/97

19

97

/98

19

98

/99

19

99

/20

00

20

00

/01

20

01

/02

20

02

/03

20

03

/04

20

04

/05

20

05

/06

20

06

/07

20

07

/08

20

08

/09

20

09

/10

20

10

/11

20

11

/12

20

12

/13

20

13

/14

20

14

/15

Projected Revised Total Grant and Pension Recipients ('000)

0

5

19

96

/97

19

97

/98

19

98

/99

19

99

/00

20

00

/01

20

01

/02

20

02

/03

20

03

/04

20

04

/05

20

05

/06

20

06

/07

20

07

/08

20

08

/09

20

09

/10

20

10

/11

20

11

/12

20

12

/13

20

13

/14

20

14

/15

Projected

Trends since 1994:Welfare Spend and GDP Ratio

2.5%

3.0%

3.5%

4.0%

70000

90000

110000

130000

Figure 2: Value of Welfare Grant Budget and as a % of GDP

Slide # 12

0.0%

0.5%

1.0%

1.5%

2.0%

-10000

10000

30000

50000

20

00

/01

20

01

/02

20

02

/03

20

03

/04

20

04

/05

20

05

/06

20

06

/07

20

07

/08

20

08

/09

20

09

/10

20

10

/11

20

11

/12

20

12

/13

20

13

/14

20

14

/15

Projected Revised Value in Rands (million) (LHS) As percentage of GDP (RHS)

Trends since 1994:Selected Indicators of Poverty Alleviation

75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%

9000

10000

11000

Households with piped water in dwelling or on site

75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%

9000

10000

11000

Households using electricity or solar energy as fuel source for cooking

Households with piped water

Households with electricity or solar power

Households in Formal Dwellings

Slide # 13

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Number ('000) Proportion

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Number ('000) Proportion

Key Trends Since 1994

Pro-Elite Policies & Interventions...

Trends Since 1994:Pro-Elite Policies and Interventions:

1. “Project Normalization” entailed interventions necessary from a

political economy perspective, but all with unintended

consequences.

2. The Employment Equity Act (No. 55, 1998), The BEE legislations,

and subsequent BBBEE amendments, the policy of “cadre

deployment”, the politicization of SOEs, are but examples of

Slide # 15

deployment”, the politicization of SOEs, are but examples of

interventions that have had considerable pro-elite outcome.

3. The extension of pro-elite into the public sector’s procurement

system evolved into a culture of “tenderprenuership”- with

systemic corruptive damage.

4. Globalization of the economy further benefitted the elite, and

exacerbated the anti-poor systemic fault-lines….

Key Trends Since 1994

The Upshot for Political Economy Scene......

Trends since 1994:Income Distribution Patterns Worsened

Per Capita Income Gini Coefficient in South Africa

Aggregate Black African Coloured Indian White

1993 0.67 0.55 0.43 0.46 0.42

Slide # 17

2000 0.67 0.61 0.53 0.50 0.47

2005 0.72 0.62 0.60 0.58 0.51

2008 0.70 0.62 0.54 0.61 0.50

___________________________________________________________________

Source: PSLSD (1993), IES (2000, 2005) and NIDS (2008): Calculations by Leibbrandt, M. et al.

1. Policy focus has been on poverty alleviation not on poverty

eradication.

2. Sources of poverty perpetuation are allowed to persist. These

are:

a) Failed education and training policy (HRD framework) in the face of rising

skills-intensity of the economy….

Trends since 1994:Why Poverty Trends Persist?

Slide # 18

skills-intensity of the economy….

b) Inefficient public sector operations…

c) Over- politicization of the public sector at all levels of management.

d) Rampant abuse of public resources via corruption as well as wastage.

3. The emergence and deepening of “value deficit”; driven by ever-

spreading ‘duality of values’ across the society.

4. The technology meanwhile drives automation….

The economy has become more automated..

45.0

50.0

55.0

60.0

% of GDP

Slide # 19

Source: South African Reserve Bank

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

40.0

45.0

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

Compensation of Employees Gross operating surplus

Concluding Remarks

1. The political economy of development is complex and often

unpredictable, riddled with domestic and external tensions.

2. South Africa’s developmental path is captured by short-term

political dynamics.

3. The old structural factors are compounded by the new and

Slide # 20

more complex dynamics of factionalism, political ideology

and sheer personal greed.

4. There is a need for an inspired leadership across the various

social stakeholders if these obdurate political economy

issues are to be resolved.

Thank you for your attention

Slide # 21

Trends since 1994:

Slide # 22