Plagues of the 21 st Century Emile Elefteriadis, FCIA, FSA Swiss Re Life & Health Canada November...
-
Upload
constance-woods -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Plagues of the 21 st Century Emile Elefteriadis, FCIA, FSA Swiss Re Life & Health Canada November...
Plagues of the 21st Century
Emile Elefteriadis, FCIA, FSASwiss Re Life & Health CanadaNovember 17, 2004
Page 2
Agenda
Possible Mortality Catastrophes
Vita Capital’s Principal-At-Risk Variable-Rate Mortality Catastrophe Indexed Note
– aka Swiss Re’s Mortality Catastrophe Bond
Modeling Approaches
Page 3
Possible Mortality Catastrophes
Terrorist Attack – Profound difference in ideology – September 11, 2001– Biological, nuclear threats
War- Middle East- North Korea- India and Pakistan- Intervention and escalation- Wars have been relatively frequent
Page 4
Possible Mortality Catastrophes
Meteorite Crash– 1908 Tunguska River, 55 meter meteorite
- 15,000 Kiloton (kT) explosion - Hiroshima 12.5 kT- a 1:1900 year event
– 1972 a 10 meter object bounced off earth’s atmosphere.
- Energy release could have been over 20kT
- a 1:35 year eventSource: Target Earth: Present, Past and Future. B. French, Lunar and Planetary Institute
Page 5
Possible Mortality Catastrophes
Influenza Epidemics 20th Century
Year Name Geographical Spread
Impact
1918 – 20 Spanish Flu
Originated in USA, spread to Europe
Estimated 40 million deaths (675,000 USA)
1957 – 58 Asian Flu Originated in Singapore, Hongkong, spread to USA, Europe
Estimated 1-2 million deaths (70,000 in USA)
1968 – 72 Hong Kong Flu
Originated in Hong Kong, spread to US, Europe
Estimated 1 million deaths (34,000 in USA)
Page 6
Possible Mortality Catastrophes
More recent outbreaks
Year Name Geographical Spread
Impact
1976 Swine Flu (H1N1)
USA
Several hundered cases, 1 death
1997 Chicken Flu (H5N2)
Hong Kong 18 Cases 6 deaths
1999 H9N2 Hong Kong 2 cases, no deaths
Page 7
Other major infectious diseases
Tuberculosis
Smallpox and threat of biological weapons
Newly emerging diseases - SARS
Other diseases - CJD, Plague, West Nile virus and other water borne / vector borne diseases (like Malaria)
Page 8
Mortality Risk Transfer
In December 2003, Swiss Re sponsored a $400 million securitization of mortality risk
The purpose was to get protection against extreme mortality events, without relying upon the credit-worthiness of a retrocessionaire
A catastrophe bond structure was used, with loss measurement based on a parametric index
Page 9
Expected Deaths
Acceptable Variance
Losses[% of expected]
Desired Risk Transfer
[100+Y]%
LIFE INSURANCE PORTFOLIO
Mortality Risk Transfer - Issuer’s Risk Position
100%
[100+X]%
The Issuer’s internal risk assessment is based on its aggregate portfolio
Page 10
Mortality Risk Transfer - Structure
Insurer
FinancialContract
Premium
Up to Original Principal Amount at Redemption
Principal At-Risk Variable
Rate Notes
Total Return Swap
Counterparty
SPV
CollateralAccount
Investment Income
LIBOR - [ ]
Original Principal Amount
Interest: LIBOR + [ ]%
(1)(2)
(3)
Page 11
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
100 100+X 100+Y
Index Results (% of Base Index Value)
% R
educ
tion
in P
rinci
pal
Mortality Risk Transfer - Payout
Attachment Point: [100+x]%
Exhaustion Point: [100 + y ]%
Page 12
Mortality Risk Transfer - Trigger Definition
The index value for a given year is defined to be the average death rate per 100,000 for pre-defined coverage area
The average death rate is calculated using a parametric index formula, which applies pre-determined weights to gender, age, and country, and draws on publicly-available mortality data as the inputs:
Attachment Point = x% of Index Value in baseline year
Exhaustion Point = y% of Index Value in baseline year
% Loss = 100 x (Index Value - Attachment Point) / (Exhaust Point - Attachment Point)
1i
,,1
)( fjii
fmjii
m
jj qagqagcIndex =
Wherecj is the weight for country j,gm,f is the gender weighting,ai is the weight for age band i, andqi,j is the observed death per 100,000 for males and females, respectively, from country j and age band i
Page 13
Historical Analysis
Historical Index
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,2001,400
1,600
1,8002,000
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000Year
Death
s per
100,0
00
W W
II 19
40-1
945
AIDS
1990
-199
5
W W
I 191
4-19
18Infl
uenz
a 191
8
Influe
nza 1
957
Influe
nza 1
968
Page 14
Modeling Approaches
Perspective:– interest is in acute events– near term (1-3 years)
Page 15
Theoretical Epidemiologic Models for Influenza/Infectious Disease
Page 16
Theoretical Epidemiologic Models
Theoretical models are useful for understanding how certain factors can influence the incidence and severity of an influenza epidemic/pandemic
SEIR Model– Susceptible– Incubating– Infected– Recovered
Page 17
Good in theory
Viral Virulence
Incidence of infection
Immunity representation
Public health, Surveillance
Population size, density
Air travel
Response
Useful for constructing various theoretical severity distributions using stochastic modeling
Page 18
Age Standardized Mortality
US Insured Age Standardized Mortality
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Dea
ths
Per 1
00,0
00
Page 19
Epidemiologic Transition
Changes in the relative importance of causes of death – Orman’s three-stage theory:
– Famine and Pestilence, prior to 19th century– Infectious diseases and pandemics , middle
of 20th century– Chronic diseases (cardiovascular, cancer)
Fourth stage? death due to longer-term degenerative diseases (Olshansky & Ault (1983), Rogers & Hackenburg ( 1987)
Page 20
US Age Standardized Mortality
Period Average annual rate of Change in Index
Standard deviation of rate of change in Index
1901-1925 -0.44% 12.2%
1926-1950 -1.64% 3.4%
1950-1975 -0.88% 2.0%
1976-2000 -1.34% 1.5%
Page 21
Future Value of Index
Approach 1– Index(t)=Index(t-1)*(1+annual change)– annual change is the RV– RV is not normal 1918 is more than 6
standard deviations– fatter tail distribution more appropriate– however returns are correlated: large
increase followed by large decrease (reversion to mean)
Page 22
Annual Change in Mortality
Annual Changes in Mortality
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%
-0.36 -0.16 0.04 0.24 0.44 0.64 0.84% Change
Freq
uecy
Page 23
Approach 2
Index(t)=Index(0)(1-Imp)^t*(1+EM)– EM is extreme mortality distribution
Page 24
Age Standardized Pandemic Mortality
Pandemic Percentage Change in Index
Excess Mortality
Per 1000
1918-20 43% 5.54
1957-58 2.2% 0.14
1968-72 2.8% 0.18
Page 25
Excess Mortality
Influenza Epidemics 20th Century
Year Name GeographicalSpread
Impact
1918 – 20 Spanish Flu Originated inUSA, spreadto Europe
Estimated 40million deaths
1957 – 58 Asian Flu Originated inSingapore,Hongkong,spread toUSA, Europe
Estimated 1-2million deaths(70,000 inUSA)
1968 – 72 Hong KongFlu
Originated inHong Kong,spread to US,Europe
Estimated 1million deaths(34,000 inUSA)
Page 26
Influenza - Excess mortality (US Experience)
Excess mortality from pneumonia and influenza during 20th century pandemics
-800-600-400-200
0200400600800
10001200
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Age
Exce
ss m
orta
lity
per
100,
000
popu
latio
n (1
918)
-20020406080100120140160
Exce
ss m
orta
lity
per
100,
000
popu
latio
n (1
957
& 1
968)
1918 A(H1N1)
1957 A(H2N2)
1968 A(H3N2)
Source: Glezen: Emerging infections: Pandemic influenza, 1996
Page 27
Infectious diseases mostly affects the young and the elderly
Proportion of deaths due to infectious diseases
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%
<1 1 to 4 5 to14
15-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65-74
75-84
85+
% o
f tot
al d
eath
s
UK (2000) Netherlands (2000) US (1998)
Sources: Office of National Statistics (UK); Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek(Netherlands), Center for Disease Control (US).
Page 28
Frequency of Pandemics since 1800
Years Virus Subtype Origin
1830-1833 Unknown Russia
1836-1837 Unknown Russia suspected
1889-90 H2 Russia
1889-1900 H3 Unknown
1918-20 H1N1 USA
1957-58 H2N2 China
1968 H3N2 China
source: Gust et al. (2001)
Page 29
Frequency Model
Time between pandemics
Exponential mean of about 30 years
Or is there a cycle?
Page 30
CDC’s FluAid –Severity Model
Based on paper “Economic Impact of Pandemic Influenza in the United States: Priorities for Intervention”, Meltzer, et all, 1999
Non-epidemiologic model used to estimate excess deaths, hospitalizations and resulting economic impact under various vaccine based interventions for a potential pandemic in the USA.
Applied FluAid model to Canadian individual inforce
Page 31
FluAid
Key Assumptions
Population('000 in force)
0-18 19-64 65+ Total% of
Total
Non-high risk 90,207 1,157,048 24,025 1,271,280 97.8%
High risk 271 20,009 8,440 28,720 2.2%
Totals 90,478 1,177,057 32,465 1,300,000 100.0%
Page 32
FluAid
At-risk groups assumed to be lives in ultimate period of mortality table and a fraction of substandard lives in the select period
Excess Mortality (default values)
Page 33
FluAid Results
DEATHS ('000s FACE AMOUNT)
Attack Rates15% 25% 35%
0-18 Most Likely 1 2 2min 1 1 1max 5 8 11
19-64 Most Likely 91 152 213min 39 64 90max 143 238 333
65+ Most Likely 41 68 95min 38 63 88max 48 80 111
TOTAL Most Likely 133 222 310min 78 128 179
max 196 326 455
Page 34
FluAid Model Relative to MCCSR Mortality Recommendation
CIA Capital and Risk Subcommittee– proposed required capital formula includes
catastrophe component – 10% of expected claims
Consistent with 25% attack rate most likely estimate from FluAid application.