p-X correlations at RHIC
description
Transcript of p-X correlations at RHIC
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
correlations at RHICcorrelations at RHIC
Michal Šumbera
Nuclear Physics Institute ASCR Řež/Prague
ALICE Physics week, Erice 5th - 9th December, 2005
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
+ - K+ K- K0S p p
+
-
- K+
K-
- - K0S
p
p
prelim or final result available
RHIC femtoscopy matrixRHIC femtoscopy matrix
P. Chaloupka, nucl-ex/0510064
Nucl.Phys.A749:283-286,2005
P. Chaloupka, nucl-ex/0510064
Nucl.Phys.A749:283-286,2005 G. Renault, hep-ex/0406066
G. Renault, PhD thesis
G. Renault, hep-ex/0406066
G. Renault, PhD thesis
Phys.Rev.Lett.91:262302,2003J.Phys.G30:S1059-S1064,2004 A. Kisiel, PhD thesis
Phys.Rev.Lett.91:262302,2003J.Phys.G30:S1059-S1064,2004 A. Kisiel, PhD thesis
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Measuring production Measuring production offset by kinematic offset by kinematic
selectionselection• If space-time ordering,
select between two configurations– One particle catching up– Particles moving away from
each other
• Final state interactions yield different correlations for these two configuration
• Interaction timeInteraction time is is shortershorter
• Weaker correlationWeaker correlation
A) faster particle flying away
B) faster particle catching up
• Interaction timeInteraction time is is longerlonger
• Stronger correlationStronger correlation
R.Lednický, V. Lyuboshitz, B. Erazmus, D. Nouais, Phys.Lett. B 373(1996)30.R.Lednický, V. Lyuboshitz, B. Erazmus, D. Nouais, Phys.Lett. B 373(1996)30.
R.Lednický, V. Lyuboshitz, Sov.J. Nucl.Phys. 20(1982)770.R.Lednický, V. Lyuboshitz, Sov.J. Nucl.Phys. 20(1982)770.
S. Voloshin, R.Lednický, S. Panitkin, Nu Xu, Phys.Rev.Lett.79(1997)4766.S. Voloshin, R.Lednický, S. Panitkin, Nu Xu, Phys.Rev.Lett.79(1997)4766.
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Effects of transverse flowEffects of transverse flow• Correlation between
momentum and emission point
• Effective reduction of source size and shift in average emission point
• Effect increases with mT
Non-identical correlations can test flow by measuring sizes and shifts of the sources
PionpT= 0.15 GeV/c
ProtonpT = 1. GeV/c
Ξ-
pT = 1.4 GeV/cΩ-
pT = 1.8 GeV/c
Emission points from Blast-waveβT = 0.73 for all species
Rout
Rside
R(R())R(p)R(p)R(R())R(R())
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
• ,K, p <T> at 200 GeV > 62 GeV Tfo at 200 GeV =62 GeV
• <T> at 200 GeV = 62 GeV Tfo at 200 GeV >62 GeV
• Temperature Tfo is higher for baryons with higher strange quark content for Blast-wave fits.
• Spectral shapes are different.
Tfo from a Blast-Wave is not same as the Temperature from a Hydro Model.
Most Central Collisions
0.13
--productionproduction @RHIC: radial @RHIC: radial flowflow
Tem
per
atu
re T
fo (G
eV)
Sevil Salur QM’05
nucl-ex/0509036
Sevil Salur QM’05
nucl-ex/0509036
T=100 MeV
Tfo=132 MeV
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
What the hydro tell us about What the hydro tell us about multistrange baryons at RHICmultistrange baryons at RHIC
Heavy hadrons, which are particularly sensitive to radial flow effects, require the additional collective “push” created by resonant (quasi)elastic interactions during the fairly long-lived hadronic rescattering stage between Tcr and Td
U. Heinz, J. Phys. G31,S717, 2005U. Heinz, J. Phys. G31,S717, 2005
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 052302 Au+Au √sNN=200 GeV
Au+Au √sNN=62 GeV
STAR Preliminary
--productionproduction @RHIC: elliptic @RHIC: elliptic flowflow
pT/n (GeV/c)0 1 2
2
2
2
1 2 ( )cos(2 )
1 2 ( )cos(2 )
1 2 cos(2 )
q
T
nq qT
q Tq
q
dNv p
d
v p
pn v
n
Sevil Salur QM’05Sevil Salur QM’05
Au+Au √sNN=200 GeV
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05MeVmmm 70)()1530(
Resonant states in Resonant states in systemsystem
*
*
*
*
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
p
*
K*
p
K
K
p
Che
mic
al f
reez
e-ou
t
KK
RelevantCrossSections:*{Kp}K*{K}*{}{p}*{}
σ σp σrescattering of K (+K ) in the medium should be higher than that of (K+p ).
K*) < *) enhanced the rescattering probability of K*.
Non-zero lifetime between chemical and thermal freeze-out regeneration σ(K*) σ(*)
Resonances: Resonances: rescattering and rescattering and recombinantionrecombinantion
Life time [fm/c] :Life time [fm/c] :(1020) = 47 (1020) = 47 (1520) = 13(1520) = 13 (1385) = (1385) = 55 K(892) =K(892) = 4 4
Npart
Sevil Salur QM’05, nucl-ex/0509036 Sevil Salur QM’05, nucl-ex/0509036
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Why Why correlations?correlations?
• (as well as other multi strange baryons) may have thermal freeze-out behaviour differing from the other hadrons: e.g. early decoupling?
•Why is elliptic flow comparable to other hadrons? Is that all suggesting early partonic collectivity?
•What is the production mechanism of (1520) resonance?
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
pp
Topological reconstruction Topological reconstruction ofof
pT= (1 , 3)
GeV/c
: y = (-0.5 , 0.5) p
T= (0.15 , 0.8) GeV/c
DcaXiToPrimVertex < 0.55cm DcaV0ToPrimVertex > 0.1cmDcaBachelorToPrimVertex > 1.5cm
..BN ..BN
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
0-10% ~ 460k
10-40% ~ 410k
40-80% ~ 150k
Centrality bins:
200GeV AuAu200GeV AuAuY2+Y4: 57M events
Analyzed Analyzed datadata
0-10% ~ 39k
10-40% ~ 110k
40-80% ~ 40k
Centrality bins:
62GeV AuAu62GeV AuAu12.7M events
~ 18k
Minimum bias:
200GeV dAu200GeV dAu10M events
..BN ..BN
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
States in unlike-sign States in unlike-sign systemsystem
200 GeV pp
**(1530)(1530)
200 GeV dAu MinBias
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
R. Witt SQM’04
R. Witt SQM’04
*
*
*
*
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
62 GeV AuAu 0-80%
200 GeV dAu MinBias
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
**(1530)(1530)
States in unlike-sign States in unlike-sign systemsystem
*
*
*
*
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
62 GeV AuAu
200 GeV AuAu: Y2+Y4
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
**(1530)(1530)
States in unlike-sign States in unlike-sign systemsystem
*
*
*
*
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
200 GeV AuAu 10-40%: Y2+Y4
200 GeV AuAu 0-10%: Y2+Y4
**(1530)(1530)
States in unlike-sign States in unlike-sign systemsystem
*
*
*
*
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
States in unlike-sign States in unlike-sign systemsystem
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
200 GeV AuAu 10-40%: Y2+Y4
200 GeV AuAu 40-80%: Y2+Y4
**(1530)(1530)
*
*
*
*
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
M
mmMmmMk
2
])([])([ 2/1222/122*
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
**(1530)(1530)
200 GeV dAu MinBias200 GeV dAu MinBias
From mFrom m to to
C(kC(k**))
**
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
M
mmMmmMk
2
])([])([ 2/1222/122*
STAR preliminarySTAR preliminary
**(1530)(1530)
200 GeV AuAu 0-80%200 GeV AuAu 0-80%
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
**
From mFrom m to to
C(kC(k**))
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
-- systematicssystematics: : experimentexperiment
• No significant energy dependence
•Strong system dependence
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
like-sign vs unlike-sign
central vs peripheral
++ & --•consistent•Coulomb-dominated
+- & -+•consistent•Coulomb + strong
Expected centralitydependence • “*” sensitive! *
-- correlations in Au+Aucorrelations in Au+Au @ @ 200 GeV200 GeV
P. Chaloupka, QM’05
P. Chaloupka, QM’05
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Spherical harmonics Spherical harmonics decomposition of non-identical decomposition of non-identical
particle correlationsparticle correlations
Z. Chajecki , T.D. Gutierrez , M.A. Lisa and M. López-Noriega, nucl-ex/0505009
Z. Chajecki , T.D. Gutierrez , M.A. Lisa and M. López-Noriega, nucl-ex/0505009
*
*
*
*
2*2*2***
arctan
)cos(
OUT
SIDE
TOT
LONG
LONGSIDEOUTTOT
k
k
k
k
kkkkk
binsall
iiiiimlml kCYkA
.*
,cos*
, ),cos,(),(4
)(
*** ppk
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Spherical harmonics Spherical harmonics decomposition of non-identical decomposition of non-identical
particle correlationsparticle correlations
• Different Alm
correspond
to different symmetries of
the source
• A00 - monopole size
• A11 - dipole shift in
out-direction
• A2m – quadrupole shape
• .....
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Accessing asymmetryAccessing asymmetry
• A11 ≠ 0 in
correlation regions
Asymmetry in the average emission point between
and
• Correct ordering (A
11 0) , i.e. in the
“right” direction (cf BW)
P. Chaloupka, WPCF’05
P. Chaloupka, WPCF’05
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Model comparisonModel comparison
FSI: S.Pratt & S.Petricioni,
Phys.Rev. C68,054901(2003)
Emission points from:
• BW constrained by CF data
• RQMD
• Difference between measured and calculated CF in the * region is under investigation
• Observed shift agrees qualitatively with flow scenario.
l
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Model comparison: Model comparison: RQMD without FSIRQMD without FSI
Petr Chaloupka and Fabrice Retière: NSD LBNL Annual Report 2004
http://www.lbl.gov/nsd/resources/annualreportcontributionsall/chaloupka.pdf
Petr Chaloupka and Fabrice Retière: NSD LBNL Annual Report 2004
http://www.lbl.gov/nsd/resources/annualreportcontributionsall/chaloupka.pdf
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Remaining technical Remaining technical challengeschallenges
• Non-flat baseline issue• Wide k* structure in CF
possible source: flow, detector effects are currently being investigated
• Using fake s to construct correlation function with similar baseline behaviour for corrections
fake s
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Summary
• First high statistics measurements of correlations were presented.
• Coulomb and strong FSI were observed.• Very good sensitivity to source size in peak
was found. Theoretical input needed.• New spherical harmonics representation of
data allowed us to observe clear shift between average emission points of and sources in qualitative agreement with transversally expanding source.
• Prospect for the same type measurement at LHC seems good!!
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
The STARSTAR CollaborationU.S. Labs:
Argonne, Lawrence Berkeley, and Brookhaven National Labs
U.S. Universities: UC Berkeley, UC Davis, UCLA, Caltech, Carnegie Mellon, Creighton, Indiana, Kent State, MIT, MSU, CCNY, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Rice, Texas A&M, UT Austin, Washington, Wayne State, Valparaiso, Yale
Brazil: Universidade de Sao Paolo
China: IHEP - Beijing, IPP - Wuhan, USTC,Tsinghua, SINAP, IMP Lanzhou
Croatia: Zagreb University
Czech Republic: Nuclear Physics Institute
England:University of Birmingham
France: Institut de Recherches Subatomiques Strasbourg, SUBATECH - Nantes
Germany: Max Planck Institute – Munich University of Frankfurt
India:Bhubaneswar, Jammu, IIT-Mumbai, Panjab, Rajasthan, VECC
Netherlands:NIKHEF/Utrecht
Poland:Warsaw University of Technology
Russia: MEPHI – Moscow, LPP/LHE JINR – Dubna, IHEP – Protvino
South Korea:Pusan National University
Switzerland:University of Bern
STARSTAR
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Back up slides
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Early freeze-out ?Early freeze-out ?
• Is this due to early freeze-out? (Could we tell?)
• Competing changes – small overall effect
• Assumed early freeze-out scenario – small effect on CF BW parameters
T[Mev] 103 103 150 0,93 0,93 0,75
R[fm] 10,3 10,3 96,9 6,9 52 2 2
early freeze-out
[fm]fm]
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
M
mmMmmMk
2
])([])([ 2/1222/122*
**(1530)(1530)
200 GeV AuAu 40-80%200 GeV AuAu 40-80%
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
From mFrom m to C(k to C(k**))
**
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
M
mmMmmMk
2
])([])([ 2/1222/122*
**(1530)(1530)
200 GeV AuAu 10-40%200 GeV AuAu 10-40%
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
From mFrom m to C(k to C(k**))
**
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
M
mmMmmMk
2
])([])([ 2/1222/122*
**(1530)(1530)
200 GeV AuAu 0-10%200 GeV AuAu 0-10%
STAR preliminary
STAR preliminary
From mFrom m to C(k to C(k**))
**
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
pion
Kaon
proton
Distribution of emissionpoints at a given emission momentum.
Particles are correlated when their velocities are similar.
Keep velocity constant: - Left: vx = 0.73c, vy = 0 - Right: vx = 0.91c, vy = 0
Dashed lines: average emission radius.
RRxx(()) RRxx(K)(K)RRxx(p)(p)
px = 0.15 GeV/c
px = 0.53 GeV/c px = 1.07 GeV/c
px = 2.02 GeV/cpx = 1.01 GeV/c
px = 0.3 GeV/c
Looking at Looking at different different particlesparticles
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
Entropy drives the Entropy drives the strangenessstrangeness yield yield
dNch/dη instead of Npart
Correlated to the entropy of the system!
Sevil Salur QM’05
nucl-ex/0509036
Sevil Salur QM’05
nucl-ex/0509036
J.Stachel: (1530)/(1321) = 0.56 0.025 for 0-10% AuAu @ 200GeV
J.Stachel: (1530)/(1321) = 0.56 0.025 for 0-10% AuAu @ 200GeV
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05LPSW: nucl-ex/0505014 LPSW: nucl-ex/0505014
•Final geometry - particle density (entropy)- drives the radii, not the initial geometry!!
•Breaks down s < 5 GeV
Entropy drives the Entropy drives the pionpion emission emission radii radii
Michal Šumbera, NPI ASCR, Prague, Czech Republic 1st ALICE Physics week, Erice 9/12/05
),(),(
),(),()(
44
44
bbbaaaba
babbbaaabaabP xpsxpsxdxd
xxrxpsxpsxdxdrS
Distribution of relative positions of particles with identical velocities and total momentum P
Two-particle correlation Two-particle correlation functionfunction
CP
ab(q )
d6Nab /(dpa3dpb
3)
d3Na /dpa3 d3Nb /dpb
3 ba
ba
ppq
ppP
23 ),()()( rqrSrdqC abP
abP
N.B. prime means in the pair CMS frame
: Space-time emission function of particle i
),( iii xps
Two particle wave funcion(QS+FSI)