Overview to Molecular Modeling modeling intro.pdf‡Hückel molecular orbital theory ‡MOPAC theory...

40
Overview to Molecular Modeling

Transcript of Overview to Molecular Modeling modeling intro.pdf‡Hückel molecular orbital theory ‡MOPAC theory...

Overview toMolecular Modeling

�E of a molecular structure

�Geometry optimization

�Related properties� vibrational frequencies� nmr� e) density

�Energy method / Energy basis set // Geometry method / Geometry basis set

ComputationalChemistry

�Atoms obey laws of classical physics

�No e) structure

�MM2, MM3, MM+, others

�Useful� Large (bio) molecules� Small molecules

�NO energy value

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

�E = 3 Ei

�Large number of parameters� C2H6

� C-C, 6 @ C-H� 6 @ C - C - H� 9 @ H - C - C - H

� C6H6

� 6 @ C - H, 6 @ C -/= C (not C - C or C = C)� 6 @ C - C - H, 24 torsion

�Parameters determined empirically

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

�Electronic structure based on , ø = E ø

�, is known exactly

�ø is unknown except for simple systems (H-likeatoms, SHO, RR, particles in boxes, etc.)

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

QuantumMechanics

�Overlap Integral

�Exchange Integral� Exchange Functional (HF theory)� Correlation Functional

Problems

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

QuantumMechanics

�Ignore part of ,

�Hückel molecular orbital theory

�MOPAC theory

�ZINDO theory

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

SemiempiricalMethods

QuantumMechanics

�HMO Hückel molecular orbital theory� Applied to conjugated hydrocarbons� Assumes ALL overlap integrals are zero

�EHT Extended Hückel theory� Applied to any molecule type

�Useful for “quick and dirty” calculations andstarting point for more advanced calculations

Hückel Theory

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

SemiempiricalMethods

QuantumMechanics

� CNDO Complete Neglect of Differential Overlap

� INDO Intermediate Neglect of ...

� NDDO Neglect of Diatomic ...

� MINDO Modified INDO� MINDO/3

� MNDO Modified Neglect of ...� AM1 Austin Model 1� PM3 Parameterized Model Series 3� AM1/d and MNDO-d (MOPAC 2000, d e-’s)

� Useful for ground state energy and geometry

MOPACMolecular Orbital Package

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

SemiempiricalMethods

QuantumMechanics

�ZINDO/1, ZINDO/3, ZINDO-d, etc

�Useful for� Transition states� Energies� Spectroscopy� Transition elements

�Not useful for optimizations

ZINDOZerner’s INDO

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

SemiempiricalMethods

QuantumMechanics

�Use complete ,

�Estimate ø

�Variation Principle (Etrial $ Eexperimental)

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

SemiempiricalMethods

ab initioMethods

QuantumMechanics

�HF-SCF� Hartree-Fock Self-Consistent Field

�B3LYP Density Function Theory (DFT)� Becke Exchange with Lee-Yang-Parr Correlation

�MP2/MP4� Second/Fourth Order Møller-Plesset perturbation

theory

�QCISD(T) Quadratic configurationinteraction

Level of Theory

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

SemiempiricalMethods

ab initioMethods

QuantumMechanics

Trial Wave Functions(Basis Sets)

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

SemiempiricalMethods

ab initioMethods

QuantumMechanics

�Open Shell (unrestricted)� Odd number of electrons� Excited states� 2 or more unpaired electrons� Bond dissociation processes

�Closed Shell (restricted)� Even number of electrons--all paired

Electron Spin

ComputationalChemistry

MolecularMechanics

SemiempiricalMethods

ab initioMethods

QuantumMechanics

Comparison of ab initio Methods (p 94)

Comparison of Models (F/F p 96)

Comparison of Commercial Software

�Capable of describing actual wave functionwell enough to give chemically useful results

�Can be used to evaluate I’s accurately and“cheaply”

Basis SetsBasis Set Criteria

Basis FunctionsHydrogenlike Orbitals

(n - l - 1) nodes

Hydrogenlike Orbitals

Basis FunctionsSlater-type Orbitals (STO’s)

Basis FunctionsGaussian-type Orbitals (GTO’s)

�Advantages� Complete� Favorable math properties

�Disadvantages� Not mutually orthogonal� Poor representation of electron probability near and

far away from nucleus (overcome using largenumber of GTO’s

GTO’s

�One or more STO on each nucleus

�Accuracy of calculation increases as� Orbital exponents chosen well� Number of STO’s used increases

Use of STO’s

�Use STO for occupied AO’s

�Examples� H 1s� C 1s 2s 2px 2py 2pz

Number of STO’s usedMinimal Basis Set

Number of STO’s usedSplit (Double Zeta æ) Basis Set

Linear combination of two similar orbitals withdifferent orbital exponents (different sizes)

ö2p = aö2p,inner + bö2p,outer

If a > b charge cloud contracted around nucleusIf b > a diffuse cloud

Examples:

H 1s, 1sN

C 1s, 2s, 2sN, 2px, 2py, 2pz, 2pxN, 2pyN, 2pzN

Triple Zeta basis sets are also used

Number of STO’s usedSplit (Double Zeta æ) Basis Set

�Extra s and p wave functions included thatare significantly larger than usual ones

�Useful for� Distant electrons� Molecules with lone pairs� Anions� Species with significant negative charge� Excited states� Species with low ionization potentials� Describing acidities

Number of STO’s usedDiffuse Basis Set

�Linear combination of different types oforbitals

�Examples� H 1s and 2p� C 1s, 2s, 2p and 3d

�Shifts charge in/out of bonding regions

Number of STO’s usedPolarized Basis Set

�Other attempts� Place STO’s in center of bonds instead of on only

nuclei

�Problems with increasing number of STO’sused� Number of I’s increases as N4 where N is the

number of basis functions� As minimization occurs, orbital exponents change

thus defining a new basis set to rebegin thecalculation

Number of STO’s used

�Wrong shape of GTO’s accounted for by� Choosing several á’s to get set of “primitive”

gaussians for compact and diffuse� Linear combination of primitives (usually 1-7) to get

STO� Optimize� “Freeze” as “contracted” gaussian function

�Use minimal, split/double zeta, polarization,diffuse sets

Use of STO’s/GTO’s

STO-NG

where N is the number of primitive gaussians

STO-3G

3 primitve gaussians per basis set

not the simplest minimal basis set

popular

Use of STO’s / GTO’sJargon: minimal basis set

K-LMG

where

K is the number of sp type inner shell primitive gaussians

L is the number of inner valence s and p primitive gaussians

M is the number of outer valence s and p primitive gaussians

Use of STO’s / GTO’sJargon: split basis set

3-21G

3 primitives for inner shell

2 sizes of basis functions for each valence orbital

6-311G

6 primitives for inner shell

3 sizes of basis functions for each valence orbital

Use of STO’s / GTO’sJargon: split basis set

* d-type orbital added to atoms with Z > 2

** d-type orbital added to atoms with Z > 2 and p-typeorbital added to H and He

d’s added:

STO-NG are 5 regular 3d’s

L-KMG are 6 3d’s dxx, dyy, dzz, dxy, dyz, dxz (formed bylinear combination of 5 regular 3d’s and 3s)

Use of STO’s / GTO’sJargon: polarization

6-31G* or 6-31G(d)

6-31G with d added for Z > 2 (FF choice)

6-31G** or 6-31G(d,p)

6-31G with d added for Z > 2 and p added to H

6-31G(2d)

6-31G with 2d functions added for Z > 2

Use of STO’s / GTO’sJargon: polarization

+ diffuse function included for Z > 2

++ diffuse function included for Z > 2 and for H

6-31+G(d)6-31G(d) with diffuse function added for Z > 2

6-31++G(d)6-31+G(d) with diffuse function added for H

Use of STO’s / GTO’sJargon: diffuse

SomeRecommendedStandardBasis Sets(F/F p 102)

~DZVP

~TZVP

Common Basis Sets