Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of Developed by the evaluation...

26
Outcome mapping

Transcript of Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of Developed by the evaluation...

Page 1: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome mappingOutcome mapping

Page 2: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome MappingOutcome Mapping

Developed by the evaluation unit of

http://www.idrc.ca/index_en.html

Developed by the evaluation unit of

http://www.idrc.ca/index_en.html

Page 3: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .
Page 4: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome MappingOutcome Mapping

Development is a journeyDevelopment is a journey

Page 5: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome MappingOutcome Mapping

“Being attentive along the journey is as important as, and critical to, arriving at the destination”

Michael Quinn Patton

“Being attentive along the journey is as important as, and critical to, arriving at the destination”

Michael Quinn Patton

Page 6: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

The Development Journey

● Here is the way we want our part of the world to be.

● Here is the path we will take to contribute

● Here are the partners we depend on for progress.

● What strategies will we use to help our partners progress?

● Here is our sphere of influence (direct interaction)

● Here’s how we will know how things are progressing.

● What do we have to change in ourselves?

The Development Journey

● Here is the way we want our part of the world to be.

● Here is the path we will take to contribute

● Here are the partners we depend on for progress.

● What strategies will we use to help our partners progress?

● Here is our sphere of influence (direct interaction)

● Here’s how we will know how things are progressing.

● What do we have to change in ourselves?

Page 7: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Development is a journey:

● Here is the way we want our part of the world to be. VISION

● Here is the path we will take to contribute MISSION

● Here are the partners we depend on for progress PARTNERS

● What strategies will we use to help our partners progress? STRATEGIES

● Here is our sphere of influence (direct interaction) OUTCOMES

● Here’s how we will know how things are progressing. M&E

● What do we have to change in ourselves? REFLECTION

Development is a journey:

● Here is the way we want our part of the world to be. VISION

● Here is the path we will take to contribute MISSION

● Here are the partners we depend on for progress PARTNERS

● What strategies will we use to help our partners progress? STRATEGIES

● Here is our sphere of influence (direct interaction) OUTCOMES

● Here’s how we will know how things are progressing. M&E

● What do we have to change in ourselves? REFLECTION

Page 8: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping – experience Outcome Mapping – experience

1. Development research organisations only contribute to change.

2. Lasting change occurs when ownership and control move from the external organisation to local actors and organisations.

3. Many assessments provide very little useful feedback to help improve performance.

4. Development of learning capacities within organisations is often ignored

1. Development research organisations only contribute to change.

2. Lasting change occurs when ownership and control move from the external organisation to local actors and organisations.

3. Many assessments provide very little useful feedback to help improve performance.

4. Development of learning capacities within organisations is often ignored

Page 9: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping - principlesOutcome Mapping - principles

1. Planning for and assessing both external results and internal performance leads to successful projects.

2. Planning, monitoring & evaluation are cyclical

3. Systematic self-assessment is a consciousness raising, consensus building and empowerment tool for those working on a project.

1. Planning for and assessing both external results and internal performance leads to successful projects.

2. Planning, monitoring & evaluation are cyclical

3. Systematic self-assessment is a consciousness raising, consensus building and empowerment tool for those working on a project.

Page 10: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping – Central ConceptOutcome Mapping – Central Concept

Development is accomplished through changes in the behaviour of people

Development is accomplished through changes in the behaviour of people

Page 11: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping – Central ConceptOutcome Mapping – Central Concept

Direction of Influence

Boundary Partners

Development is accomplished through changes in the behaviour of people

Development is accomplished through changes in the behaviour of people

Development Research Institution

ILRI

PartnerInstitution

IPSARD

PartnerInstitution

MARD

Beneficiaries

CommunityMembers

Pig Farmers

Oxfam GB

Ultimate Beneficiaries

Page 12: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping – Boundary PartnerOutcome Mapping – Boundary Partner

Boundary partners are

Those individuals, groups, or organisations with whom the program interacts directly and with whom the program can anticipate opportunities for influence

Boundary partners are

Those individuals, groups, or organisations with whom the program interacts directly and with whom the program can anticipate opportunities for influence

Page 13: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Sexual Health Service

Providers

SocialMarketers

Youth groups

Health ServicesSupport

Institutions

PROGRAM PURPOSEREDUCED PREVALENCE OF STIs

PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY

Strategic Partners –

outside PNG

Strategic Partners – within PNG

PASHIP

Page 14: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping – Central ConceptOutcome Mapping – Central Concept

● By using OM a program will not be claiming the achievement of development impacts but rather contributions to the achievement of outcomes.

● These outcomes will enhance the possibility of development impacts

● By using OM a program will not be claiming the achievement of development impacts but rather contributions to the achievement of outcomes.

● These outcomes will enhance the possibility of development impacts

Page 15: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping – Central ConceptOutcome Mapping – Central Concept

OUTCOMES

Changes in the behaviour, relationships, activities and/or actions of the people, groups and organizations with whom a program works directly.

OUTCOMES

Changes in the behaviour, relationships, activities and/or actions of the people, groups and organizations with whom a program works directly.

Page 16: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping – Central ConceptOutcome Mapping – Central Concept

Direction of Influence

Boundary Partners

Development is accomplished through changes in the behaviour of people

Development is accomplished through changes in the behaviour of people

Development Research Institution

ILRI

PartnerInstitution

IPSARD

PartnerInstitution

MARD

Beneficiaries

CommunityMembers

Pig Farmers

•Resources•Technical expertise•Capacity building

•Research info•Awareness•Advocacy

•Farmer friendly Policy•Informed Extension

•Supply of quality pigs

Ultimate Beneficiaries

Page 17: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping Outcome Mapping

Stages in developing

the map

Stages in developing

the map

Page 18: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .
Page 19: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

BOUNDARY PARTNERS

Vision

Outcome Challenges

Outcome Mapping: Main ElementsOutcome Mapping: Main Elements

Strategies

Organisational Practices

Progress Markers

Mission

Page 20: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome challengeDistrict level Government personnel serving rural farmers

The IRD program intends to see district level government staff within the MAFF, MRD and MEnv being regarded with respect by local farmers because of the contribution they are making to help meet their needs as farmers. The government staff themselves are gaining increasing levels of satisfaction with their work. They have increasing opportunity to be actively engaged in work they have been trained in and are included within the IRD program Planning and monitoring meetings. They are also becoming more involved in activities relevant to the local farmer’s needs, such as land use mapping, data collection, and technical support, including marketing.

Page 21: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Progress MarkersDistrict level Government personnel serving rural farmers

A. Expect to see (Indicating reactive participation)1 Involved in IRD training opportunities

2 Participating in IRD Planning, monitoring and evaluation sessions

3 Engaged in community land use mapping and Agro-ecosystem Analysis 4 Routinely collecting relevant agriculture data

B. Like to see (Indicating more active learning or engagement)

5 Regularly meeting with farmers on their farms

6 Facilitating on-farm trials by farmers7 Leading out in formal training sessions with farmers

8 Providing appropriate technical advice to farmers

9 Networking with other organisations to increase their knowledge, skills and expertise

10 Advocating with higher levels of government on behalf of farmers

C. Love to see (Indicating profound, transformational change)

11 Being coached, mentored and involved in appropriate performance management approaches.

12 Being fully supported in their work by government funds

Page 22: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

STRATEGY MAPSSTRATEGY MAPS

Aimed at the

Boundary Partner

Aimed at the Boundary Partner`s

Environment

Strategy SupportivePersuasiveCausal

I-1

Direct Output

E-1

Alter physical or regulatory

environment

I-2

Arouse New Skills/ Thinking

I-3

Supporter who guides change

over time

E-2

Modify the information

system

E-3

Create / Strengthen a Peer Network

Page 23: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

STRATEGY MAPSSTRATEGY MAPS

I-1

E-3E-2E-1

I-3I-2

Page 24: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping – M&EOutcome Mapping – M&E

● A program’s contributions to development are planned and assessed based on its influence on partners with whom it is working to effect change.

● A program’s contributions to development are planned and assessed based on its influence on partners with whom it is working to effect change.

Page 25: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping – M&EOutcome Mapping – M&E

● Focusing monitoring and evaluation on changes in partners illustrates that, although a program can influence the achievement of outcomes, it cannot control them because ultimate responsibility for change rests with its partners

● Focusing monitoring and evaluation on changes in partners illustrates that, although a program can influence the achievement of outcomes, it cannot control them because ultimate responsibility for change rests with its partners

Page 26: Outcome mapping. Outcome Mapping Developed by the evaluation unit of  Developed by the evaluation unit of .

Outcome Mapping Outcome Mapping