NuMI MINOS CM Review Magnetics Page 1 Magnetization options for the calibration module Jeff Nelson &...
-
Upload
bethany-preston -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
1
Transcript of NuMI MINOS CM Review Magnetics Page 1 Magnetization options for the calibration module Jeff Nelson &...
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 1
Magnetization options for the calibration module
Jeff Nelson & Bob WandsCalibration module review (8/00)
• Simulations: status and impact• 2 concepts
– Pro/Con– Designs– Magnetics– Coil and steel requirements
• Conclusion– Probably the last talk you’ll ever
see on this subject!
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 2Simulations
• Peter’s Monte Carlo study found that fields in steel have negligible effect on showers
– The air field is not implemented in GMINOS -- It should be studied
– The air field is roughly
» B = 100 gauss / r (r in [m])
– Low energy particles won’t make it from the steel to the scintillator
<0.3 MeV @ inner radii
• A CDHS NIM article also shows little effect on hadronic response
• Peter’s conclusion (in Jeff’s words)– “If it’s so small... let’s just make the
spectral measurement in the near detector with & without field”
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 32 Options
• Need a magnetic circuit• Box Option
– Connect the tops & bottoms of two plates
– Use one plate as the flux return for the other
– Wrap power coils on the short legs » 2 coils per pair of planes
• Flux Return Option– Use a larger steel plane
put a hole off center and wrap a coil on it» Like the near detector!
– Flux stays in a plane– Can power 2 planes with
the same coil (more later)
edge-on view
face-on view
scint area
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 4Pros & Cons
• Pro– Box
» Shape of planes nearly the same as the standard plane
» Less steel, better access– Flux return
» Fewer coils and lower power
» The air field is in the right direction (parallel to the steel planes)
• Con– Box
» The air field is in the wrong direction (normal to the planes)
– Flux return» Mechanical headache» Air field is at the low end unless
substantial power employed
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 5
Box Option:Integration with Scintillator
• 2 horizontal plates connect 2 planes making an open-sided “box”
• A module is slipped into the box and the next is connected to the outside of the box
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 6
Box OptionField in Steel
• The required current is roughly 1500 a-turns per coil
• Either design can repeated for as many pairs of planes as required
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 7Coil Design
• Coils can be made like our test toroid– 300 turns of 10 gauge insulated wire – 15A power supply
• Repeat for each coil• Readout system and coils
for ~ $3500, existing supplies?
400 turn coil
15A power supply
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 8The Flux Return Option
• Add 3 (thicker) plates to the edges to make a flux path
• 2 planes can be tied together using the same power coil
• Some manifolds are buried in the flux return
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 9
Flux Return OptionFields in Steel
• This design can yield lower fields at lower currents• This plot shows the field with higher current to produce more air field
– 3000A-turns yields ~1.3T
Instrumented Area
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 10
Air fields in the Flux Return Option
• Fields between planes ~ 9 to 11 gauss » 3000 A-turns
• To get 100 gauss need » 100 times the power -- Ouch!
Half of the instrumented area
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 11
• System based on that used for the 4PP and the table top toroids
• Automated readout via PC & Labview – Waveform digitizes integration-coil signals – Monitors power supply – Automated current control
» Presets for hysteresis loop, degauss…– Expandable for multiple supplies
Control and Monitoring
V(t)B= A V(t)dt
I(t)
B vs I
NuMI
MINOS
CM ReviewMagneticsPage 12Conclusions
• 2 options make reasonable fields in steel– Both use cheap coils & existing control
systems
• Simulations show that the field in the steel in probably unimportant
• The field in the air may or may not be important– If it is… the flux return option is the
only one that’s close» Many drawbacks
– Size and shape makes issues for the mechanical support
– Poor access to the manifolds if they are 1m modules
– The actual field in the air is low
– If not... flush this talk