Mu&Ma (無と間) in Japanese Art and Visual Perception
-
Upload
sharon-gershoni -
Category
Documents
-
view
449 -
download
2
Transcript of Mu&Ma (無と間) in Japanese Art and Visual Perception
Mu & Ma In Japanese Art and Visual Perception
Sharon Gershoni The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Bezalel Academy for Art and Design
Bloomfield Science Museum Jerusalem
10.6.2010
Outline Zen “Seeing”
1. Mu “no thing” and “no image”
2. Ma “timelessness-spacelessness”
And …….. art
Visual Perception
1. Mu- blindsight, and conscious vision
2. Ma- saccadic suppression
Theoretical, intellectual knowledge is a “language game”: It is distinction-making It creates dualism And is illusory in nature Deepen state of meditation is a practical experiential knowledge: It is non-discriminatory wisdom It is true seeing Is real nature Enlightenment: No distinction between “I” and “Other” or “I” and ”Nature”
Is there such a thing? “there is”-”there is not” or “being”-”not being” are derived from an intellectual oppositional standpoint
“Is there or is there not no-thought and no-image?” - a paradox Solution: Use linguistic space independently from reference Go beyond oppositional thinking
Koan
Mu as Nothing?
Zen Nothing “No”
A monk: “Does the dog have buddha-nature?” Joshu: “No[thing].” The monk: “All sentient beings have buddha-nature. Why doesn’t the dog have it?” Joshu: “He has discrimination due to his karma.”
No to the formulation of the question the monk cannot rely on the 4 logical ways for understanding a thing or an event: 1. “There is” 2. “There is not” 3. Both: “there is” and “there is not” 4. Neither “there is” and “there is not”
Zen Nothing “No”
A dialogue between Jinne (684-758) and Chosetsu (807-888) Chosetsu: What is “no thought”? Jinne: nothing like “what is”… Suppose that there is a clear, transparent mirror. If it does not face a thing, no image is reflected in it... If it faces something, it just mirrors its image. Chosetsu: If it does not face any thing, is there or is there not a reflection in the mirror?
“Kensho” Zen Seeing
“When seeing turned into one’s nature”
(Yanagita, 1974, 132-3.)
Jinne: …It always mirrors regardless of whether it is facing or not facing a thing. Chosetsu: If it always mirrors, how does it mirror? Jinne: The mirror always mirrors, because it is clear, transparent and possesses an original nature of always mirroring things. Analogously, people's mind is originally undefiled…
“Kensho” Zen Seeing
“When seeing turned into one’s nature”
(Yanagita, 1974, 132-3.)
Jinne: … it sees no-thing. That is the true seeing. It always sees. Mirror nature is a ceaseless activity, regardless of facing an object. In and of itself, it possesses no specific image to mirror. Hence, no image appearing in it: “no-thought” or “no-image.”
“Kensho” Zen Seeing
“When seeing turned into one’s nature”
(Yanagita, 1974, 132-3.)
Outline Zen “Seeing”
1. Mu “no thing” and “no image”
2. Ma “timelessness-spacelessness”
And …….. art
Visual Perception
1. Mu- blindsight, and conscious vision
2. Ma- saccadic suppression
“to show one's original face before one's parents were born.” A non-dualistic experiential dimension- “timeless” and “spaceless” : No before and after No whole and parts One time contains all times and one part contains the whole.
“Timelessness-Spacelessness”
Understanding here and now
Timelessness and spacelessness are the natural and original zone of all things (including human beings). Zen suggests a leap from a causal temporal series.
“Timelessness-Spacelessness”
Understanding here and now
No measuring units No linear progression from past to present to future.
Time and being are inseparable Time-Space is a dynamic living experience: The bird and the sky each becomes themselves through the other
“Timelessness-Spacelessness”
“the bird flies the sky and the sky flies the bird.” “U-ji” - an integrated time and space (Dogen Zenji 1200-1253)
Outline Zen “Seeing”
1. Mu “no thing” and “no image”
2. Ma “timelessness-spacelessness”
And …….. Zen paintings
Visual Perception
1. Mu- blindsight, and conscious vision
2. Ma- saccadic suppression
Outline Zen “Seeing”
1. Mu “no thing” and “no image”
2. Ma “timelessness-spacelessness”
And …….. Zen paintings
Visual Perception
1. blindsight, and conscious vision
2. saccadic suppression
Other amazing things that blindsight people can “guess”
Colors
simple shapes
termination onset Event
rapid transient event rapid movement rapid onset
“feeling” “knowing” (something happened)
stationary displays slow displays
“unaware” (no experience at all)
Blindsight Type 1 Blindsight Type 2
Ebbinghaus & Line-Size Illusions: Our Reference Frames We can fool perception judgment, but not the hand (Melvyn Goodale Lab)"
Outline Zen “Seeing”
1. Mu “no thing” and “no image”
2. Ma “timelessness-spacelessness”
And …….. Zen paintings
Visual Perception
1. blindsight, and conscious vision
2. saccadic suppression
But how big is the image of one fixation
Visual acuity: Sharp vision is in the fovea- a 0.2mm (in diameter) or 5° 1% of the retina.
Multistability
Ambiguous perceptual experiences pop back and forth between alternative interpretations
Top View
Front View
Simple geometrical shapes are recognized independent of: rotation, scale, lighting conditions, variation in components, etc