MONITORING & EVALUATION FOR RECIPIENTS OF EU FUNDS...
Transcript of MONITORING & EVALUATION FOR RECIPIENTS OF EU FUNDS...
Page 1
Ministry of Planning
European Union
MONITORING & EVALUATION
FOR RECIPIENTS OF EU FUNDS
Page 2
Does this picture ring a bell?
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Page 3
We ask participants to draw an
image which reflects what
monitoring means to them !!!
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Page 4
A quote to remember….
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
“ I keep six honest serving men, They taught me all I
knew. Their names are
What, Why, When, How, Who and Where”
(Rudyard Kipling)
Page 5
What is monitoring
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
It is not only about observing and listening, but also about
assessing information, learning from it and adjusting one's
approach if necessary.
It tracks the actual performance or situation against what
was planned or expected according to pre-determined
targets
It provides an ‘early warning system’, which allows for
timely and appropriate intervention if a project is not
adhering to the plan
Page 6
Internal and External Monitoring
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
` Internal Monitoring External monitoring
By Implementing body
itself (GB)
EUD, BMZ, PDP, MOP
Sources of
information
Grant contract e.g.
project log frames,
project’s monitoring
tool (covering out,
results, specific and
overall objectives),
procurements, GB
reports
Grant contract e.g.
project log frames,
project’s monitoring
tool (covering out,
result and impact),
procurements, GB
(internal) and PDP
(external) reports
Comparative
objectivity
More subjective More objective
Page 7
Why do we monitor and evaluate?
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
• To generate specific information required by CA/donors about
the progress being made on NGO-implemented projects;
• To ensure that funds and resources are used properly;
• To keep project activities on schedule, and to review and
update the project plan as necessary;
• To review projected costs, timelines and deliverables and to
explain variances from the original plan;
• Positive outcomes help to secure continued or new financial
support: demonstrating the success attract more funds.
Page 8
When do we monitor?
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Monitoring has to be planned from the start, not tacked
on later as an afterthought.
Monitoring hence takes place throughout the whole
lifetime of the project.
A final evaluation at the end of the project (done by GB
and PDP) as well as a post evaluation months/years
after the completion of the projects (PDP)
Page 9
When do we monitor GB projects?
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
GB Tri-monthly report
GB Final report
GB Tri-monthly report
GB Interim report
PISU 1st Monitoring
visit
PISU Monitoring
visit
PISU Monitoring
visit
PISU Spot Monitoring
visits
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
PISU Closure
visit report
PISU Post Evaluation
visit report
Page 10
How do we monitor?
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
• Monitoring visits • Scheduled Regular visits
• Spot visits
• Project Reports
• Grant Beneficiaries’ reports
• Monitoring actors’ reports (as results of monitoring visits)
• Support activities (from PISU when required/recommended)
Page 11
Monitoring visits
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
1. Scheduled Regular visits • First monitoring visit:
GB is informed prior to the visit
within 45 days after contract signatures
• Regular monitoring visits:
Conducted in line with the schedule agreed on with GB
2-3 per project.
2. Spot visits:
GB is not informed prior to the visit
Page 12
Project Reports
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Project reports can be classified into two groups:
1- Grant Beneficiaries’ reports
a) Tri-monthly reports
b) Interim report
c) Final report
2- Monitoring actors’ reports
a) Monitoring Visit Reports
b) Early Warning Report
c) Project Irregularity Report
Page 13
Grant Beneficiaries’ reports
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
a) Tri-Monthly Progress Report :
Tri Monthly Progress Reports (see Annex 8) present
information about the current situation of the project
activities and achievement of results, current and
anticipated problems, remedial actions and planned
future activities.
Page 14 Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
b & c) Interim and Final Reports
The Grant Beneficiary must draw up Interim report and
a Final report.
These reports shall consist of narrative and financial
sections as in Annex 1(i,ii,iii) of the Monitoring Manual,
including supporting documents (if requested).
Grant Beneficiaries’ reports
Page 15
Monitoring actors’ reports
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
a) Monitoring Visit Reports
Monitoring visit reports are the documents which indicate the actual
performance of the project and are used for analysis of the
problems and the needs of Grant Beneficiary.
b) Early Warning Report
The Early Warning Report serves as a tool to detect projects with
high risk on fulfilment of contractual obligations and to take
measures to solve the problem before getting into an intricate
situation.
c) Project Irregularity Report
Irregularity report is the last resort if there is nothing to correct the
intricate situation for fulfilling the contractual obligations. In case of
suspected or detected irregularities, it should be reported to the CA
immediately.
Page 16
Support activities
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Support activities are mainly carried out by PISU and UUU
to Grant Beneficiaries in the following fields:
• Facilitation between various stakeholders inside the target
areas
• Results and impact monitoring.
• Technical and financial documentation
• Procurement procedure and documentation
• Eligibility of costs, accounting and record keeping
• EU visibility and publicity rules
• Schedule of reporting
• Preparation of reports
Page 17
How does it work?
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
A systematic process of continually improving what we do by
learning from what we have done and achieved in the past. This
approach emphasizes the need to learn by doing and to evolve
alongside changes in the environment.
This way of management requires a series of different steps:
1. Clarify the goals and purpose of the project
2. Plan actions and monitoring
3. Implement actions and monitoring
4. Gather data/evidence and feedback
5. Reflect on the findings and evaluate them
6. Modify/review actions based on the new knowledge/learning
Page 18 Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Who is involved?
Page 19
Who is involved?
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
• GB themselves
It is imperative that the project team members, including
management, go through all the project monitoring steps.
The team may need to get some advice or assistance
from outside sources, but ultimately they need to do the
work themselves.
Page 20
What do we monitor?
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Project Financing & Contractual
Structure (Grant Contract)
Financial Records including the
project Bank account
Compliance with contractual
and Procurement Procedures
Project Activities, Outputs,
Outcomes (Impact)
Financial
Bank
account
Procurement
Activities
,
outputs,
outcome
Page 21
Monitoring – important issues:
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
• What activities have been completed, versus what should
have been done
• How long it has taken, versus how long it should have
taken
• What it has cost, versus what it should have cost
• The quality of outputs produced and delivered, versus
what was planned
• Outside:
• How people are reacting to our activities, versus what was
assumed
• The benefits people are drawing from the activities, versus
what was planned
Page 22
Identify Sources of Information
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
1. Pre Assessment situation (Baseline data) In order to observe changes resulting from project activities, it is often
necessary to establish bench- marks against which indicators can be
judged.
2. Post Assessment Situation (Formative Evaluation)
Formative evaluation is concerned with identification of gaps in the
implementation process which could be overcome by the implementation
team early enough so as not to affect the end-of-program results. To that
end, the following measures are planned for closely monitoring and
formatively evaluating training interventions:
Page 23 Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
a) Trainees' Satisfaction Questionnaire: It aims to measure
trainees’ satisfaction with training content, delivery, trainer’s
skills and applicability to workplace. Trainees’ satisfaction
questionnaire is administered by a program coordinator at the
end of each training program. Results of those questionnaires
will be shared with respective trainers and program managers
so that identified trainee’s dissatisfaction with any part of the
training process could be overcome.
Post Assessment Situation
Page 24 Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
b) Trainees' Learning Gain: To assess learning gains, a
set of pre and post assignments are designed to ensure
trainees’ development of key knowledge and skills essential
for their on-the-job performance. Trainees’ scores on those
assignments will be used to select a sample of youth to
follow up with them on their application of training on the
job.
Post Assessment Situation
Page 25 Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
c) Follow-up Field Observations: Post training field visits will
be arranged to a sample of youth who attended the training
sessions. Those field visits will be conducted jointly by a
project coordinator and a representative from the respective
NGOs that delivered training to the visited youth. An
observation log will be developed to capture observers’ notes
during the field visit. At the end of their observation, observers
will conduct focus group meetings with observed youth to
discuss their observation notes.
Post Assessment Situation
Page 26 Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
D) Focus Group Meetings: During those meetings, issues
that affect trainees' on-the-job application will be discussed
with respective youth in order to highlight factors that
minimize the feasibility and applicability of the training
modules for youth.
Post Assessment Situation
Page 27
Listing/Tracking End Beneficiaries
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
A development of a web application data base
on http://egypt-urban.net/grants/ Grant
beneficiaries/user/password/database/beneficiaries .
The use of such data base, help us;
• Involve grant beneficiaries from the very beginning in monitoring
themselves (Decentralized Monitoring)
• Ensure that our grant beneficiaries documenting their work
regularly
• The output of this data base will guide and give us alert and also
the GB of the number of end beneficiaries who are benefiting
from more than one project.
• The end beneficiaries should not be benefited twice
Page 28
Prepare a Detailed Monitoring Plan
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
We recommend not jumping into
implementation and data collection
without first having a clear idea of
what information you need, for
whom, and why.
For that purpose you will need a
monitoring plan for each project that
you will implement.
Page 29
There are several key questions to consider in order
setting up a monitoring plan for your project
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Grant Contract
Number
Title of the Grant
Contract
Project goal: Indicators of
Effectiveness:
What
information
to collect:
How to collect the
information:
Frequency: Who will
collect
information:
How will it be
analysed:
How will
information be
used:
Project specific
objectives:
Indicators of
Effectiveness
What
information
to collect:
How to collect the
information:
Frequency: Who will
collect
information:
How will it be
analysed:
How will
information be
used:
Project
Outputs:
Indicators of
Effectiveness
What
information
to collect:
How to collect the
information:
Frequency: Who will
collect
information:
How will it be
analysed:
How will
information be
used:
Page 30 Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Impact Monitoring
Page 31
What is impact monitoring?
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
• Impacts are intended or unintended, positive or negative
changes in a situation or in behaviour that occur as the
direct or indirect consequence of an intervention
• Impact monitoring allows steering complex programme
approaches, supports reporting requirements, builds the
cornerstone for improving aid transparency & mutual
accountability and is hence the basis for possible further
funding
Page 32
Impact monitoring of GB projects
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
• The impact of each project (that is receiving funding from
the PDP Grant Scheme) on its respective target group and
area is to be monitored through the Grant Beneficiaries
own monitoring activity according to project indicators
(logframe) that indicate project performance.
Page 33
Impact Chain
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
The direct measurable results/outputs (tangible products
and services) of your project which are largely under the
projects management control
High aggregated Impact
Overall objectives
Specific objectives
Expected results
Activities
These are the tasks as described in detail in the
application, which have to be undertaken in order to
produce the expected results of the project
The development outcomes expected at the end of your
project
This is the overall development aim towards which your
more specific project objective should contribute to
The long term benefits resulting from the action
Page 34
Logical framework: Example on Lot 1
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
High aggregated Impact
Overall objectives
Specific objectives
Expected results
Activities
The global objective of this Call for Proposals is: To
enhance the socio-economic situation of residents in the
eligible informal areas (employment, income generation,
improved services)
Lot 1: Employed residents
The unemployed residents are better skilled
100 unemployed residents trained
Train unemployed residents
Page 35
Logical framework: Example on Lot 2
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
High aggregated Impact
Overall objectives
Specific objectives
Expected results
Activities
The global objective of this Call for Proposals is: to
enhance the socio-economic situation of residents in the
eligible informal areas (employment, income generation,
improved services)
Lot 2: Improved income generation
Women setup and start rooftop farming
100 women trained on rooftop farming
Train women on rooftop farming
Page 36
Logical framework: Example on Lot 3
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
High aggregated Impact
Overall objectives
Specific objectives
Expected results
Activities
The global objective of this Call for Proposals is: to
enhance the socio-economic situation of residents in the
eligible informal areas (employment, income generation,
improved services)
Lot 3: Improved services (e.g. at a health center)
Staff is qualified
20 staff members trained
Train staff (e.g. of a health center)
Page 37
How do we monitor? Sources of verification!
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
High aggregated Impact
Overall objectives
Specific objectives
Expected results
Activities
PDP (Survey)
GB (Support PDP in
surveys) PDP (Ex-post Survey)
GB (Baseline Data & Final
project assessment)
PDP (Survey at the end of
the project)
GB (reports; internal
monitoring documents e.g.
training documentation)
PDP (Visits, GB reports
and on the spot visits)
GB (reports; internal
monitoring documents e.g.
training agendas)
PDP (Visits, GB reports
and on the spot visits)
Page 38
Most important sources of verification
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
1. Pre Assessment: Baseline data
In order to observe changes (on the level of the specific and overall
objective) resulting from project activities and results, it is necessary
to collect baseline data. Baseline data functions as a bench-mark
against which the project objectives can be judged at the end of the
project.
2. Post Assessment Survey
After the conclusion of each project, a survey has to be conducted
asking the end beneficiaries questions in order to assess whether
the provided results have an impact on their situation/qualification.
Page 39
Impact Monitoring tool
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Description Indicator/
Milestone
Due Date Responsi
bility
Frequen
cy
Source of
Verification
Specific
information
Status (Text) Status (Colour) Comment
The indicator or
milestone (each
indicator is supported by
several milestones that
‘guide’ towards indicator
achievement).
The date the
indicator/
milestone is to
be achieved
latest.
Who is
responsible to
collect the
information
The frequency
the respective
indicator is
monitored
The source providing
the information to
verify the respective
indicator’s/milestone’
s achievement.
What specific information to
be collected
The current status information
regarding the achievement of the
respective indicator.
A ‘traffic lamp’ that categorises the
information given in the status info into
four categories: achieved, on track, at
risk, failed.
Additional information regarding the
monitoring of the respective
indicator/milestone
Level of Overall Objectives
Objective of lot
x
O1 Indicator
Level of Specific Objectives
SO1 Indicator
Milestone 1
Milestone 2
Milestone 3
SO2 Indicator
Milestone 1
Milestone 2
Milestone 3
...
...
Level of Expected Results Indicator 1.1
Milestone 1
Milestone 2
Milestone 3
Indicator 1.2
Milestone 1
Milestone 2
Milestone 3
Indicator 2.1
Milestone 1
Milestone 2
Milestone 3
...
...
...
Page 40
Q ? & A:
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Page 41
Mahmoud Abou Zeid:
012 719 66610
Mohamed Ammar:
012 719 666 75
Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Page 42 Participatory Development Programme in Urban Areas
Monitoring visits are not
auditory, but Supporting
and advising !!
"You need to be ready
to taste the food while
you cook :)