MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

download MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

of 11

Transcript of MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    1/11

    MIMO RADAR:

    CONCEPTS,PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTS,

    AND

    APPLICATIONS

    By-Saurabh Shukla

    M.Tech (CE)ICE2012005

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    2/11

    CONTENTS

    Introduction

    Notations

    MIMO Radar Virtual Aperture

    MIMO Radar in Clutter Free Environment

    Optimality of Radar for Detection

    MIMO Radar with moving targets in Clutter : GMTIRadars 2

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    3/11

    1. INTRODUCTION

    1.1-A SHORT HISTORYOF RADAR-

    By 1904, Christian Hulsmeyer had developed and

    patented a spark-gap transmitterreceiver system for

    naval navigation.

    In 1935, Sir Robert Watson-Watt demonstrated and

    patented a working radar system. This system had all

    the essential characteristics of a useful radar.

    Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) became an active

    area of research during the end of 1950.

    3

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    4/11

    In the 1960s, the development of phased-array

    antennas became an important area of research,

    allowing radars to quickly change search direction.

    During the 1970s, digital signal processing became

    viable, and was applied to radar processing,

    enabling adaptive array processing and the modernradar system.

    4

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    5/11

    1.2-DEFINITION AND CHARACTERISTICS OF

    MIMO RADAR

    The notion of MIMO radar is simply that there aremultiple radiating and receiving sites.

    Fig 1- Basic MIMO radar.

    The location of the m-th transmitter is given by xm,and the location of the n-th receiver is given by yn.

    5

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    6/11

    The collected information is then processedtogether.

    RIAS & SIAR radar are the early example of MIMORadars.

    By the most general definition, many traditional

    systems can be considered as special cases ofMIMO radars.

    As an example, SAR can be considered as a form

    of MIMO radar.

    Although SAR traditionally employs a singletransmit antenna and a single receive antenna

    6

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    7/11

    The positions of these two antennas are translated and

    images are formed by processing all the information jointly.

    SAR radar does not have access to channel

    measurements for all transmitreceive position pairs.

    This is the significant difference between the SAR radar

    and a typical MIMO radar, which takes full advantage ofthe degrees of freedom.

    Various possible signaling techniques are used for MIMO

    radar. The transmit antennas radiate signals, which may ormay not be correlated, and the receive antennas attempt

    to disentangle these signals.

    7

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    8/11

    It is assumed that the waveforms coming from eachtransmit antenna are orthogonal.

    There is a continuum of MIMO radar systems concepts;however, there are two basic regimes of operation.

    In the first regime, the transmit array elements (andreceive array elements) are broadly spaced, providing

    independent scattering responses for each antennapairing, sometimes referred to as statistical MIMO radar.

    In the second regime, the transmit array elements (andreceive array elements) are closely spaced so that thetarget is in the far field of the transmitreceive array,sometimes referred to as coherent MIMO radar.

    8

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    9/11

    Answer to the question How large must the angular separation be toget independent scattering responses? is dependent on the details ofthe target.

    As shown in Fig. 2, if an array of appropriately phased scatterers ofthe physical size of the target can resolve individual locations of theantennas, then independent scattering responses would theoretically

    be possible.

    Fig 2-Coherent versus incoherent scattering response.

    Conversely, if the overall angular antenna separation were smallcompared to the beamwidth of the scatterer array, then coherentprocessing would be viable.

    9

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    10/11

    1.3-USESOF MIMO RADAR

    Improved target detection performance

    Improved angle estimation accuracy

    Decreased minimum detectible velocity

    10

  • 7/28/2019 MIMO RADAR chap 2.pptx

    11/11

    2. NOTATION

    11