Mian Usman
-
Upload
sohaib-butt -
Category
Documents
-
view
228 -
download
0
Transcript of Mian Usman
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
1/25
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
2/25
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
3/25
30-2
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Varieties of Takeovers
Takeovers
Acquisition
Proxy Contest
Going Private(LBO)
Merger
Acquisition of Stock
Acquisition of Assets
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
4/25
30-3
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
30.1 The Basic Forms of Acquisitions
There are three basic legal procedures that one firmcan use to acquire another firm: Merger Acquisition of Stock Acquisition of Assets
.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
5/25
30-4
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Merger or Consolidation
A merger refers to the absorption of one firm by anotherThe acquiring firm retains its Name
IdentityA consolidationis the same as a mergerexcept new firm is created.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
6/25
30-5
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Advantage and Disadvantage
An advantage of usinga merger to acquire a firm is that it is
legally straightforwarddoes not cost as much as other forms of acquisition.
A disadvantage is that a mergermust be approved by a vote of the shareholders of eachfirm.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
7/25
30-6
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Acquisition of Stock
A firm can acquireBy another firm by purchasing target firms voting stockin exchange for cash, shares of stock, or other securities.
Acquisition of Assets One firm can acquire another by buying all of its
assets.
A formal vote of the shareholders of the selling firmis required.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
8/25
30-7
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
A Classification Scheme
Financial analysts typically classify acquisitionsinto three types:
Horizontal acquisition: when the acquirer and the targetare in the same industry.
Vertical acquisition: when the acquirer and the target areat different stages of the production process; example: anairline company acquiring a travel agency.
Conglomerate acquisition: the acquirer and the target arenot related to each other.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
9/25
30-8
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Two "Bad" Reasons for Mergers
Earnings Growth Only an accounting illusion.
Diversification
Shareholders who wish to diversify can accomplish thisat much lower cost with one phone call to their brokerthan can management with a takeover.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
10/25
30-9
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Determining the Synergy from anAcquisition
The concept that the value and performance of twocompanies combined will be greater than the sum ofthe separate individual parts.
when Synergy exist the following will effectCostRevenueTaxesCapital requirement
)(Synergy B A AB V V V
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
11/25
30-10
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Source of Synergy from Acquisitions
Revenue Enhancement Market GainsMergers and acquisitions can produce greater
operating revenues from improved marketing.
Monopoly PowerOne firm may acquire another to reduce competition. If so,
prices can be increased and monopoly profits obtainedCost Reduction
Economies of scalethe average cost of production falls while the level of
production
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
12/25
30-11
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Economies of verticalIntegrationThe main purpose of vertical acquisitions
is to make coordination of closely relatedoperating activities easier Complementary ResourcesSome firms acquire others to make betteruse of existing resourcesor to provide the missing ingredient for
success .
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
13/25
30-12
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Elimination of InefficientManagementThere are firms whose value could
be increasedwith a change in management
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
14/25
30-13
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Tax Gains Net Operating Losses
Unused Debt Capacity
Surplus Funds
The Cost of Capital
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
15/25
30-14
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Calculating the Value of the Firm after anAcquisition
Avoiding Mistakes Do not Ignore Market Values Estimate only Incremental Cash Flows Use the Correct Discount Rate Dont Forget Transactions Costs
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
16/25
30-15
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Divestitures
Divestiture can take three forms: Sale of assets: usually for cash Spinoff: parent company distributes shares of a
subsidiary to shareholders Issuance if tracking stock: a class of common stock
whose value is connected to the performance of a particular segment of the parent company.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
17/25
30-16
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
The Corporate Charter
If one individual or group owns 51- percent of a companysstock, this control block makes a hostile takeover virtuallyimpossible.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
18/25
30-17
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Repurchase Standstill Agreements
Standstill agreements are contracts where the biddingfirm agrees to limit its holdings of another firm.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
19/25
30-18
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Going Private and LBOs
If the existing management buys the firm from theshareholders and takes it private.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
20/25
30-19
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Other Defensive Devices
Golden parachutes are compensation to outgoingtarget firm management.
Crown jewels are the major assets of the target. Ifthe target firm management is desperate enough,they will sell off the crown jewels.
White Knight is a friendly bidder who promises tomaintain the jobs of existing management.
Poison pills are measures of true desperation tomake the firm unattractive to bidders. They reduceshareholder wealth.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
21/25
30-20
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
30.11 Some Evidence on Acquisitions: Stock PriceChanges in Successful U.S. Corporate Takeovers
Takeover SuccessfulTechnique Targets Bidder
Tender offer 30% 4%Merger 20% 0%
Proxy contest 8% NA
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
22/25
30-21
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Abnormal Returns in Successful CanadianMergers
Target BidderMergers 1964--83 9% 3%
Going privateTransactions 1977--89 25% NA
- Minority buyouts 27% NA
- Non-controlling bidder 24% NA
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
23/25
30-22
McGraw-Hill Ryerson 2003 McGraw Hi ll Ryerson Li mited
Comparison of U.S. vs. CanadianMergers
The evidence both in U.S. and Canada stronglysuggests that shareholders of successful target firmsachieve substantial gains from takeovers.
Shareholders of bidding firms earn significantly lessfrom takeovers. The balance is more even forCanadian mergers than for U.S. ones.The reasons may be: There is less competition among bidders in Canada. The Canadian capital market is smaller. There are federal government agencies to review foreign
investments.
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
24/25
-
8/12/2019 Mian Usman
25/25
30-24
Summary and Conclusions
The possible synergies of an acquisition comefrom the following:
Revenue enhancement Cost reduction Lower taxes Lower cost of capital
The reduction in risk may actually help existing
bondholders at the expense of shareholders.