Mandibular Fractres(1)

download Mandibular Fractres(1)

of 37

Transcript of Mandibular Fractres(1)

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    1/37

    1

    Maxillofacial Trauma

    Mandibular Fractures

    Mandible is embryologically a membrane bent bone although,resembles physically long bone it has two articular cartilages

    with two nutrient arteries

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    2/37

    2

    Mandible in traumaMandibular fracture is more common than middlethird fracture (anatomical factor)

    It could be observed either alone or in combinationwith other facial fractures

    Minor mandibular fracture may be associated withhead injury owing to the cranio-mandibulararticulation

    Mandibular fracture may compromise the patency ofthe airway in particular with loss of consciousness

    Fracture of mandible occurred with frontal impactforce as low as 425 lb (190 Kg) {Condylar fracture}

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    3/37

    3

    Fracture of condyle regarded as a safety mechanismto the patient

    Frontal force of 800-900 lb (350-400 Kg) is requiredto cause symphesial fracture

    Mandible was more sensitive to lateral impact thanfrontal one

    Frontal impact is substantially cushioned by openingand retrusion of the jaw

    (Nahum 1975)

    Long canine tooth and partially erupted wisdomsrepresent line of relatively weakness

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    4/37

    4

    Anatomical considerations

    Attached muscles:

    Masseter

    Temporalis

    Medial and lateralpterygoid

    Mylohyoid

    Geniohyoid andgenioglosus

    anterior belly ofdigastrics

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    5/37

    5

    Blood supplyEndosteal supply via the ID artery and vein

    Periosteal supply, important in aging due todiminishes and disappearance of alveolarartery

    Bradley 1972

    NerveDamage of inferior dental nerve

    Facial palsy by direct trauma to ramus

    Damage of facial nerve in temporal bonefracture

    Goin 1980

    Damage to mandibular division of facialnerve

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    6/37

    6

    Factors influenced site of fracture

    and displacementAnatomy of themandible and attachedmuscle (canine &wisdoms)

    Weakening areas ofmandible (resorptionand pathologyl)

    Direction of force of theblow

    Age of the patient

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    7/37

    7

    Types of fractureSimple

    Greenstick fracture (rare, exclusively in children)Fracture with no displacement (Linear)Fracture with minimal displacement

    Displaced fracture

    Comminuted fractureExtensive breakage with possible bone and soft tissue

    loss

    Compound fractureSevere and tooth bearing area fractures

    Pathological fracture(osteomyelities, neoplasm and generalized skeletal

    disease)

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    8/37

    8

    Sites of fracturesCondyle fracture

    Intracapsular fracture

    Extracapsular fractureHigh condyle neck fracture

    Low condylar fracture

    Angle/ ramus fracture (bodyfracture)

    Canine region (parasymphesial

    fracture)

    Midline fracture (symphesisfracture)

    Coronoid fracture (rare)

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    9/37

    9

    Incidence of mandibular fractures

    Body fractures 33.6%

    Subcondylar fracture 33.4%

    Fractures at the angle 17.4%

    Alveolar fractures 6.7%

    Ramus fractures 5.4%

    Midline fractures 2.9%

    Fracture of coronoid process 1.3%Oikarinen & Malmstrom 1969

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    10/37

    10

    Favourable orunfavourable

    They can be vertically or horizontally in

    direction

    They are influenced by the medial pterygoid-masseter sling

    If the vertical direction of the fracture favours theunopposed action of medial pterygoid muscle, theposterior fragment will be pulled linguallyIf the horizontal direction of the fracture favours theunopposed action of messeter and pterygoid muscles in

    upward direction, the posterior fragment will be pulledlingually

    Favourable fracture line makes the reducedfragment easier to stabilize

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    11/37

    11

    Effects of muscles on displacement

    Transverse midline fracture (symphesial)

    stabilizes by the action of mylohyoid and

    geniohyoid

    Oblique fracture (parasymphesial) tends tooverlap under the influence of muscles action

    Bilateral parasymphesial fracture results inbackward displacement associated with loss of

    tongue control when the level of consciousness

    is depressed

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    12/37

    12

    Condylar fractures

    The most common mandibular fracture

    Unilateral or bilateral

    Intracapsular or extracapsular

    Antero-medial displacement is

    common but it may remain

    angulated with the ramus

    Dislocation of the glenoid fossa andfracture of petrous temporal bone

    which is very rare

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    13/37

    13

    Sign and symptoms

    Swelling, pain, tenderness and restriction of movement

    Deviation of mandible towards the side of fracture

    Gagging of occlussion (premature contact on the posteriorteeth) with bilateral condylar displaced or over-riding fractures

    Displacement of mandible toward the affected side

    Anterior open bite on opposite side of fracture

    Laceration of EAM****

    Retroauricular ecchymosis****

    Cerebrospinal leak and otorrhea in association with skull basefracture

    Condylar fractures

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    14/37

    14

    Sequlae of TMJ injury

    Artheritic changes

    Haemartherosis, fibrosis and aknylosis

    Meniscal damage and detachment

    TMD

    Staph infectionwith condylar backward

    displacement and external auditory meatus injury

    Meningitiswith petrous temporal bone fracture andintracranial involvement

    Condylar fractures

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    15/37

    15

    Coronoid process fracture:

    Rare fracture caused by direct trauma toramus and results from reflux contraction oftemporalis

    Can be seen following operation of largeramus cyst

    Elicit tenderness over the anterior part oframus

    Development of tell-tale haematoma

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    16/37

    16

    Fracture of the ramus:

    Type I Single fractureMimics low condylar fracture that runsbelow the sigmoid notch

    Type II comminuted fracture

    Common in missile injuries and appears tobe with little displacement due to effects ofmesseter and medial pterygoid muscles

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    17/37

    17

    Fracture of the angle and bodyPain, tenderness and trismus

    Extra-oral swelling at the angle with obviousdeformity

    Step deformity behind the molar teeth

    Movement and crepitus at the fracture site

    Derangement of occlussion

    Intra-oral buccal and lingula heamatoma

    Involvement of IDN

    Gingival tear if fracture in dentated area

    Tooth involvement and possible longitudinalsplit fracture

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    18/37

    18

    Midline fractureThe most common missed fracture (always

    fine crack)

    Can be symphesial or parasymphesialfracture

    Commonly associated with one or bothcondyles fracture

    Unilateral fracture leads to over-riding ofthe fragments and bilateral may contributein loss of voluntery tongue control

    Long canine tooth represent a weak areaand contributes to parasymphesial fracture

    Rarely runs across mental foramen

    Midli f t

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    19/37

    19

    Signs and symptoms

    Pain and tendernessSwelling and odemeaDevelopment of step deformityMental anesthesiaHeamatoma in the floor of mouth and buccal mucosa

    Soft tissue injury of the chin and lower lip

    If associated with condylar fractures

    Absence of condyle movement on the contrlateral side

    Deviation of mandibleAnterior open biteGagging of oclussionLimitation of mouth opening

    Midline fracture

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    20/37

    20

    Clinical assessment and diagnosis

    History of trauma(traumatized patients with possible head injury) and facialinjuries

    Clinical ExaminationExtroral

    Inspection (assessment of asymmetery, swelling, ecchymosis, lacerationand cut wounds)

    Palpation for eliction of tenderness, pain, step deformity and malfunction

    Intra- and paraoral

    bleeding, heamatoma, gingival tear, gagging of occlussionand step deformity and sensory and motor deficiency

    Radiographs

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    21/37

    21

    Radiographs

    Plain radiographOPG

    Lateral oblique

    PA mandible

    AP mandible (reverse

    Townes)

    Lower occlusal

    CT scan

    3-D CT imaging

    MRI

    http://www.srt-psc.com/jfmand2.jpghttp://www.srt-psc.com/jfmand4.jpghttp://www.srt-psc.com/jfmand2.jpg
  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    22/37

    22

    Principles of treatmentsimilar to elsewhere fractures in the body

    Reduction of fragments in good position

    Immobilization until bony union occurs

    These are achieved by:Close reduction and immobilizationOpen reduction and rigid fixation

    Other objective of mandible fracture treatment:Control of bleeding

    Control of infection

    Definiti e treatment

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    23/37

    23

    Definitive treatmentSoft tissue repair

    Debridment

    Irrigation with saline and antibioticsClosure in layers

    Dressing

    Reduction and fixation of the jaw

    Close reduction and IMF (traditional method by means ofmanipulation)

    Open reduction and semi-rigid fixation (using inter-ossouswirings)

    Open reduction and rigid fixation (using bone palatesosteosynthesis)

    Objective:Restoration of functional alignment of the bone fragments inanatomically precise position utilizing the present teeth for

    guidance

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    24/37

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    25/37

    25

    Close reduction

    Bonded brackets

    IMF screws

    Dental wiring:

    Direct wiring

    Eyelet wiring

    Local anesthesia orsedation

    Minimal displacementIMF for 6 weeksTreatment can be performedunder GA or LA and when

    surgery is contraindicated

    http://www.srt-psc.com/%20wjnpos.jpg
  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    26/37

    26

    Fracture mandible in children

    Close reduction

    Open reduction and

    fixation

    Plating at the inferiorborder

    Resorpable plates

    http://www.srt-psc.com/ca2.jpghttp://www.srt-psc.com/ca3.jpg
  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    27/37

    27

    Gunnings splint

    Old modality

    Edentulous patient

    Rigid fixation is not

    possible

    To establish the

    occlusion

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    28/37

    28

    Open reduction and fixation

    Intraoral approach

    Extraoral approach

    Submandibular

    approach

    http://www.srt-psc.com/ael.jpg
  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    29/37

    29

    Rigid fixation

    Intraossous wiring

    Plates and screws

    Kirchener wire

    Lag screws

    http://www.srt-psc.com/drfx1po.jpg
  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    30/37

    30

    Reconstruction palate

    Severe trauma

    Loss of part of the bone

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    31/37

    31

    Condylar fractures

    Intraoral approach

    Ramus incision

    Extraoral approachPreauricular approach

    Retromandibular approach

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    32/37

    32

    IMF

    Transosseous wiring

    Circumferential wiring

    External pin fixation

    Bone clamps

    Trans-fixation with Kirschner wires

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    33/37

    33

    Osteosynthesis

    Non-compression small plates

    Compression plates

    Miniplates

    Lag screws

    Resorbable plates and screws

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    34/37

    34

    Teeth in the fracture line

    The fracture is compound into the mouth

    The tooth may be damaged or lose itsblood supply

    The tooth may be affected by somepreexisting pathology

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    35/37

    35

    Management of teeth retained in fracture

    line

    Good quality intra-oral periapical radiograph

    Insinuation of appropriate systemic antibiotic

    therapy

    Splinting of tooth if mobile

    Endodontic therapy if pulp is exposed

    Immediate extraction if fracture becomes

    infectedFollow up for 1 year and endodontic therapy if

    there is a loss of vitality

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    36/37

    36

    Absolute indicationsLongitudinal fracture

    Dislocation or subluxation from socket

    Presence of periapical infection

    Infected fracture line

    Acute pericoronitis

    Relative indicationsFunctional tooth that would be removed

    Advanced caries or periodontal diseases

    Doubtful tooth which would be added to existingdenture

    Tooth in untreated fracture presenting more than 3days after injury

  • 7/31/2019 Mandibular Fractres(1)

    37/37

    37