Maj Gen Daryl Bohac BG Roy Robinson · PDF file1 NGAUS BOD Webinar Meeting Minutes July 13,...
Transcript of Maj Gen Daryl Bohac BG Roy Robinson · PDF file1 NGAUS BOD Webinar Meeting Minutes July 13,...
1
NGAUS BOD
Webinar Meeting Minutes
July 13, 2016
MG (Ret) Deborah Ashenhurst
Maj Gen Daryl Bohac
BG Roy Robinson
Brig Gen (Ret) Ken Ross
Brig Gen Murray Hansen
Col (Ret) Steve Greco
BG Frank McGinn
Col Dave Fleming
Brig Gen Carol Timmons
MG Max Haston
COL Jimmie Cole
Brig Gen (Ret) Robert Hamrick
Col (Ret) Tony DeJesus
LTC Eric Leckel
Brig Gen (Ret) Jon Fago
BG John Lathrop
Maj John Brownell
Brig Gen (Ret) Dave Brubaker
BG (Ret) Daryl McCall
CPT Mark Timmons
Capt John Fesler
CW3 Lance Jenkins
Absent Members:
MG Stephen Danner
Maj Gen William Reddel
MG James Hoyer
MG Augustus Collins
COL John Mark Prine
MG Timothy Reisch
MG Jefferson Burton
Non-Voting Members:
Maj Gen (Ret) Robert Gruber
Col (Ret) Pete Renaghan
Mike Strum, NGEDA President
Mr. Chip Lunn, CAP (absent)
MG Glenn Curtis, AGAUS President (absent)
CMSgt John Harris, EANGUS President (absent)
2
General Ashenhurst called the meeting to order at 1000. Brig Gen Hansen called the roll and
reported a quorum was on the call.
Gen Ashenhurst called for a motion to approve the minutes from the March meeting. Gen
Hansen so moved. Gen Brubaker seconded. Motion passed.
Gen Ashenhurst asked Gen Hansen to remind the members on the Roberts Rules of Order on
debate.
Gen Ashenhurst call for a report from Army Vice Chair, BG Robinson who had nothing to add
then Maj Gen Bohac, Air Vice Chair, who also had nothing to add.
Gen Ashenhurst made the following appointments:
1. Conference committee appointments:
a. Area I Caucus Chair—LTC Eric Leckel
b. Area IV Caucus Chair—Major John Brownell
c. Nominations Chair—BG John Lathrop
d. Rules and Credentials—Brig Gen (Ret) Robert Hamrick
e. Retire/Separated—BG (Ret) Daryl McCall
f. Resolutions:
Colonel Mike Morgan – Chairman, Joint Resolutions
Brig Gen Murray Hansen – Chairman, Air Resolutions
LTC Lance Englet – Chairman, Army Resolutions
g. Company Grade Committee - Captain John Fesler
Gen Ashenhurst entertained a motion to approve the appointments. Gen Hansen so moved. Gen
Brubaker seconded. Motion carried.
Gen Ashenhurst discussed the Selection Committee process upcoming for the replacement of the
upcoming NGAUS President position,
The timeline is as follows:
a. Announcement for the position will go out this month (July) and run for (1) month.
b. Need to make sure of the applicant’s prerequisites and experiences
c. At the end of August, first of September we will close that advertisement
d. The selection committee will be chaired by MG Frank Vavala, TAG-DE.
e. The Committee will be composed of former chairman of the board, retiree rep, executive
director, company grade rep and some at large people.
f. We are working to make sure there is diversity on the committee
g. The committee will have time to review the applicants and narrow it down to two or three
and those will be presented to the November Board meeting for selection.
3
h. The selected person will be come on board mid-February; there will be an overlap
through February and March for Gen Hargett to orientate the new President to Congress
and other pertinent organizations up to the March Board of Directors meeting.
i. The hand off will take place after the March Board of Directors meeting and the selectee
will take over.
Mike Hadley—Legislative Update
Staff:
New staff, Elle Ross, Army Programs Manager, starts 18 July; Mark Malizia, Legislative
Assistant, will work on resolutions
Grace Washbourne, Joint Programs
Matt Pincus, Air Programs
Heather Bennett, Fellow for MS Guard
Legislative Calendar:
Last week Congress is in session until September 6th ; no Congressional activity during
this period
Looking at NDAA and expect nothing on this until September
House has named conferees but the Senate has not
Defense Appropriations: House passed theirs but the Senate does not; will probably have
and Omnibus bill at the end of the year; more to follow
Have legislation that falls under the Veterans Affairs Committee; got update yesterday
that the House VA Committee does not anticipate passing any legislation for the
remainder of the calendar year.
Working the conference resolutions; about 100 new resolutions; in the process of
reviewing those and getting NGB input
Working closely with the Task Forces to get their input on resolutions and get out prior to
conference
Gen Hansen said things being tracked specifically in the NDAA is a change to the definition of
joint matters and the ULB efforts fix to the missing 12304b mobilization authorization benefits.
Mike said they are in the process of putting together some talking points and recommendations if
anyone would like to contact their members and conferees. Those will be out in the next few
days.
Gen Hargett commented that he is afraid that if the House does not pass anything on 12304b, it
will fall the same way the veteran’s effort did. He said he is worried about the 12304b efforts.
Mike said he also does not think anything will move with that this year.
Gen Hansen said we cannot take the pressure off the work on that issue.
Gen Hargett said he thinks most people will support it but the issue is will they pass anything.
Gen Hansen said he would be in favor in pushing back on the utilization of 12304b until the
equal benefits are laid-in. Gen Hargett agreed.
4
Mike said Congress have been supportive but he does not think it will get on the docket this year.
Mid-Year Budget Update
Gen Ross commented on the overall financial condition of the organization. We are positioned,
well well as possible, to face any challenge. We are taking advantage of the time, after paying off
the building mortgage, to rebuild our reserves. Except for the NGEF, we are well reserved
across the board. There is about $24M total currently in reserves. He sees nothing that
challenges our organization financially over the short term.
Budget Update - Pete Renaghan
He reported on the decreases/increases in excess of $5000 (only) over the original budget.
Revenue:
Membership - decreased $100,000 based on year to date actual
Insurance Royalties - increased $4,250, based on our share of the 2016 projected
Insurance Trust net income.
Magazine - decreased $70,000 based on year to date actuals
General Operations - increased $29,000 based on 2015 dividends received in 2016
Overall decrease in revenue of $131,350
Expenses:
Overall decrease of $83,000
Furniture, Equipment and Depreciation - increased $5,000
Travel - decreased $51,000 based on 2016 requirements
Departments:
Membership/member benefits - decreased $25,000 based on BOD decision to return 25%
of dues to the states in the membership challenge program.
Magazine - decreased $51,000 based on magazine commission cost
Public Relations - decreased $6,000 based on BOD allowance for social media expansion
General Conference - increased $6,000 based on Distinguished Guest registration
expense
Industry Relations - decreased $7,000 based on reduced Industry Day expenses
Building Budget:
Revenue:
Proposed $4,056,053 for 2016 compared to $4,078,327 budgeted for Annual 2016. The
net result is an unfavorable variance of $22,274
Rental - unfavorable variance of $39,468 primarily due to the projected but unrealized
TVA lease removal
Parking - favorable variance of $5,183 due primarily to the more parking contracts being
signed than projected
Expenses:
Proposed $4,817,969 Midyear 2016 compared to $6,085362 budgeted for Annual
2016, result in a favorable variance $1,267,393
Utilities - favorable variance of $29.235 due to vacancies creating greater than
anticipated utility savings
5
Management & Leasing Fees - unfavorable variance of $670,349 due to current
projections for a greater level of leasing activity (Amtrak)
Administrative - unfavorable variance of $81,241 due to greater than projected bank
charges ($60,000) and marketing expenses ($20,000)
Repair and Maintenance - favorable variance of $25,043 due to budgeted contingency
repairs not being necessary
Service Contracts - favorable variance $14,757 due to lower janitorial costs as a result
of vacancies.
Capital Expense - favorable variance of $1,952,166 which as a result of the proposed
Amtrak lease will result in lower that projected capital expenses in 2016 (but will also
shift these costs into 2017)
Net Cash - proposed $761,916 Midyear 2016 compared to $2,007,035 budgeted for
annual 2016 results in a favorable variance of $1,245,119 due to the aforementioned
explanations
Gen Ross made a motion to approve the proposed changes to the mid-year building and
NGAUS budgets. Gen Hansen so moved.
Discussion:
Gen Ross commented these are relatively small changes compared to the overall budget.
The Finance Committee has looked at all these changes. The question to ask is why there
is a $81,000 unfavorable variance in administrative cost. The reason for that is
significant because there was nothing budgeted against it which is primarily our
investment cost. This will be included in future budgets.
Gen Ross commented on the status of the building which is our single biggest financial
challenge. There are currently three vacant floors. We are in serious negotiations with a
potential contract with Amtrak and are into our fourth iteration of exchanges of offers and
counter-offers. They thought they would have that contract finished by today but it did
not happen yet. He is confident they will make an offer we can accept. The potential
contract will be for at least ten years. That contract will take all the vacant space
available to lease for more than ten years. The only downside is because of the size of
the space, we are looking at more than $11.5M for build-out. We would get into this with
about three or four years of negative cash flow to get our money back. He thinks this is a
risk we should take. He thinks overall we will net just fine with the result being a totally
rented building. He said in that arrangement, over the first 18 months for the $11.5M
build-out, we do not have enough money in the building reserves alone to do that. We
will need $3M or so worth of additional money. We have enough reserves NGAUS wide
and can move that around if needed. He recommends we borrow the additional money
from our brokerage account at a rate of about 1.5% to 1.9%. He said those are attractive
rates to short term borrowers that would be paid off with the rental proceeds and leave the
reserves intact and vested. We have averaged about 6% or better on our reserves over the
long term history of the association. He recommends we use all the money we have in
reserves for the build-out and borrow the remainder at about $1.5% and pay it off. He
said unless there objection from the Board that is what they intend on doing.
6
Gen Hargett commented that is assuming they use all the build-out funds in the first year.
He said there is a possibility this could be spread out over a period of time.
Gen Ross agreed it would be spread out over a period of time. The earlier the rent comes
in the more of that rent can be used for the build-out. It is a bit of a debate of when that
cash will be spent. It might mean that there will be some rent to offset it, to the extent we
have to go past our cash reserves for this purpose. It seems to him a really good business
move to borrow 1.5% money on our brokerage account. The worst case scenario is that if
we change our minds later we will just cash in some of the investments and pay off that
loan. We have plenty in reserves to do it and it just means it will take everything out of
the market in order to meet a short term cash deal.
Gen Ashenhurst commented that is exactly why we have reserves.
Gen Robinson asked if it is prudent to use our reserves with the interest rate environment
we are in right now. There is a likelihood that the returns on the investments will well
exceed the interest expense on any borrowed money. From a long term perspective, he
wonders if it would make sense to consider additional borrowed money as opposed to
dipping into the reserves.
Gen Ross said that is the consideration and that is exactly why he does not want to sell
off investments. The reason he is proposing that we use our cash is that we are aware
that we will get a tenant with a significant build-out. He said we don’t want to get
ourselves into a position where you have to sell off long term investments. He said he
wants to use the cash we have on hand (that we are getting little return on) and build the
building out. Anything we need beyond that, we borrow money so that we don’t
liquidate true equity investments.
Gen Ross asked Col Renaghan, what the current investment rate is? The current rate is
1.59% and if we decide to lock in the note it would be 1.93%. Col Renaghan said
basically (over the last five years) our net return has been 8.07% annualized.
Gen Ross said that is why they are thinking that with an invested interest is less than 2%,
let’s not liquidate anything. He said he does not want to incur too much debt and keep a
balance between keeping us debt free and investing reserves. He thinks we should use
our available cash to keep the balance so that at any time we can pay it off, if the market
and the economy starts to go bad and we have the reserves on hand to pay off that loan.
Gen Brubaker asked if there would be some safeguards written into the contract with
Amtrak so that they cannot just walk away after we have spent all that money on the
build-out?
Gen Ross said there are no escape clauses at all. Amtrak is an entity would have a lease
they are obligated long term, for ten years plus. The risk would be if the Amtrak
Corporation went insolvent which would entail the government deciding they would no
longer subsidize them, which then yes, they are taking that risk. He said he can’t say it is
7
totally without risk, but the Building Board members agreed that the government will
continue to support Amtrak and that way they will have no way to get out of the contract.
They could sublease the space which is really no concern to us.
Col Fleming asked about EANGUS intent to rent space in the building.
Gen Ross said they want to, but they have not leased any space to date. The proposal
with Amtrak will take all the available space in the building. He said there are some
small spaces that come up from time to time and by the end of the year there may be an
adequate vacancy, but right now Amtrak is taking all available space. EANGUS has not
leased any space and if they called the day after the Amtrak lease, there would be no
space for them.
Gen Ross said he has had numerous discussions with EANGUS and told them we cannot
keep space off the market for them.
Gen Hansen said EANGUS may be having an issue with selling or renting their building.
Gen Hargett commented that we have consistently told EANGUS we are trying to lease
our space. He said to least to them space would be a deal-breaker with Amtrak. We do
have some other leases that expire in December and not sure if they will renew their
leases. He said EANGUS still has their building up for sale and there is a possibility we
will have space before they can sell their building.
Gen Ross said he is not thrilled with having three floors vacant, but when there is a
possibility of an almost 11 year lease, he does not think it’s the wrong thing to take a sure
deal.
Gen Hargett commented there are presently two new building sitting on both side of us
(NGAUS) that are less than 50% leased. There is a brand new building at 440 First Street
that is less than 10% leased. There is a lot of vacant property around us.
Gen Ashenhurst called for the vote to approve the changes as submitted by the Finance
Committee to the Building and NGAUS mid-year budgets. Motion carried.
Gen Ross reported on the upcoming contracts.
Thompson Greenspon Auditing Company has accomplished our audits for several years.
The policy is that we send out a RFI or RFP to check the market. We are pleased they
came back the best quote. The Finance Committee recommends that we accept their
proposal and contract them for another two years.
Gen Ross made a motion that we the Board approve the contract with Thompson
Greenspon. Gen Brubaker seconded. Motion carried.
Maj Gen (Ret) Dan O’Hollaren - By-Laws report
The Executive Council of the TN NGA has proposed a limitation of Board
membership
8
This change would bar Separated and Retired Guardsmen and women from being
on the Board of Directors as an Area Representative, a Company Grade Officer
representative or a Warrant Officer representative
Proposal:
• Proposed Bylaws Language – Article V- Board of Directors, Sec. 5.02 (cont.) – (a)(II) Amend to read, Two Directors who are Company Grade
Officers and currently serving National Guard members. Further,
…the Army officers shall nominate the currently serving Army
representative; the Air Officers, the currently serving Air
representative.
– (a)(III) Amend to read, One Director who is a Warrant Officer and a
currently serving member of the Army National Guard.
• Proposed Bylaws Language – Article V- Board of Directors, Sec. 5.03 • (e) Add, Each Director, with the exception of those specified in
Sec. 5.02 (a) (IV), shall be currently serving members of the
National Guard. “Currently serving” or “currently serving
member” is defined as those with a status of M-Day, Technician
or Active Guard & Reserve (AGR) member and not a Retired or
Separated member.
(f) Add, If a Director shall become Retired or Separated while
serving in a position elected under Section 5.02 (a) (I) through
(III), the Director shall serve the remaining balance of his or
her term, but may not be eligible for re-election while in a
Retired or Separated status. NGAT Rationale:
• Currently serving members will possess a stronger situational awareness of issues
relevant to the National Guard
The By-Laws Committee reviewed the proposal and overwhelmingly recommended that
we do not accept this change. The Committee agreed that the bottom line is; area
caucuses should continue to vote in the members they chose to serve.
Committee Questions:
• What event or circumstance precipitated the request for such a change request?
• Why was this limited to Board members and did not include Officers of the Board
as well?
Gen O’Hollaren reminded the Board that per Article XI, Section 11.01b, the Board can
only vote to support, oppose or take no position on the proposed amendment This action
by the Board shall be advisory only and shall be reported by the Chairman of the By-
Laws Committee to the General Conference for consideration.
9
Discussion:
COL Cole asked if the earlier questions were presented to the proposal presenters. Gen
O’Hollaren said they did not.
COL Cole said there should be clarification in the By-Laws to address when someone
leaves the Board. Gen O’Hollaren reminded him that is already in the By-Laws.
COL Cole said with the area representation, company grade, retiree/separated and
warrant officer we capture all the constituents on the Board. He wondered if we already
have specific Board members in all those categories as well as retiree/separated
representation membership, then why have other retirees on the Board from the areas.
That would possibly mean that retirees in an area may lose situational awareness what is
currently happening on the ground.
Gen Hansen commented that the areas should decide by voting for who they want to
represent their areas concerns. For the BOD to limit that further, is out of our lane.
Gen Brubaker said he totally agrees. He said that if the By-Laws Committee looked at it,
he totally supports their conclusion.
Gen Hansen made a motion that they accept the recommendation of the By-Laws
Committee. Gen Brubaker seconded.
Gen Ashenhurst clarified the motion to state that the Board will accept the
recommendation of the By-Laws Committee in opposing this By-Laws change.
Gen Hargett commented that a vote “yes” is a vote” no” to accept the recommendation.
Gen Ashenhurst called for the vote. A voice vote was needed.
Seven members voted No. The Ayes have it. Motion carried.
Maj Gen Daryl Bohac - General Conference Committee Update
The Committee met via teleconference on June 30th,with nine members attending plus
Jake, Patty and Mike Sturm.
Two items discussed:
1. Spargo Inc, proposed an increase of $100 per exhibitor category. The committee
unanimously approved to recommend to the Board of Directors to adopt the increase
beginning with the 2017 General Conference.
Chip Lunn said the CAP is fine with this going forward.
Gen Ross moved we accept the recommendation of the General Conference Committee.
Gen Brubaker seconded. Motion carried
10
2. Increase in registration fee for 2017: Kentucky inquired if the committee would
consider a registration fee increase. An increase would normally be voted on at the
March meeting, the SOP is ambiguous in its guidance about timing and source of
request. Therefore the committee discussed it and agreed to consider an increase of
$15 in the registration fee from $165 to $180. He said we continue to have a
consolidate industrial base (meaning fewer potential donors) and we need to
recognize this. There has been a 35% increase in food and beverage cost over time.
It was approved and the committee recommends the Board adopts the increase of $15
in the registration fee beginning in 2017 General Conference.
Gen Brubaker seconded the motion on the floor. Motion passed.
Gen Robinson commented that at the last Board meeting the final vote was to accept an
increase with a delayed implementation. He asked how this affects that action.
Gen Bohac said if his memory serves him correctly, we ultimately voted after significant
discussion to return the action to the committee for further review.
Gen Robinson said he does not quite remember it that way. He said he thought the final
passage was to approve the increase with delayed implementation.
Gen Fago said he was the one who recommended that we increase it last time and the
committee gave the figure of up to $195 and when discussed the first time, it passed and
then he remembers Gen Robinson said we need to consider our Airmen and Soldiers.
Then they did a reconsideration and it was voted it down and returned it to the committee
for a new proposal and that is where we are now.
Gen Robinson asked if it can be considered to add to the SOP so that there will not be a
request every year for a registration fee increase. He suggested every four or five years.
Gen Fago said a way to do that is to tie it to some kind of cost index or on a periodic
three or five year rotation and do it as a review and that would be the recommended time
to consider an increase instead of having to address it every year. He said that would
require due diligence and a vote from the Board.
Gen Ross agreed with Gen Fago. He recommends we index it to inflation and have it in
$5 increments so that every time the inflation rate goes up there will be a $5 change. He
said that way everyone will be able to anticipate the change and be able to calculate it.
Gen Ross said it is difficult to address the fee change because it is not changed in 5-8
years and then there is a $50 increase all at once and no one wants to deal with that. He
suggested his proposal be considered by the committee, with his support of an index fee
increase. He asked if Gen Bohac and committee would take that on.
11
Gen Brubaker recommended that we not try to solve it on the fly today but have it go
back to the committee. He said there are several ways to attack that to make it more
palatable.
Gen Robinson said we need to reinforce it with the states that when they bid on the
conference that we are tied into a kind of rate structure so that we won’t have to
constantly move things around based on the states saying they can’t do it with that
anymore.
Gen Hansen agreed. He asked for a comment from Captain Timmons on the perspective
from the Company Grade.
Captain Timmons he did not see the increase of $15 as a burden for the Company Grades
as opposed to the previous proposal.
Gen Ashehurst called for the vote on the motion on the floor to increase the registration
fee by $15 from $165 to $180. Motion carried.
Awards Committee Report - John Goheen
John is reporting for the Chairman of the Awards Committee, COL Paul Caviness.
The awards approved today will be sent to the states by end of July and those will be
presented at the Conference in Baltimore.
John said they received 89 nominations which was the most received since 2012. The
selection rate was 80% this year.
Some of the problems they see each year is that some of the nominations lack sufficient
depth of detail. Also noted was that some of the awards were written as if they were
federal awards. We need to see more contributions to the Guard and NGUAS. The
committee will provide that information to the states next year when the call for
nominations goes out.
Committee Recommendations:
Truman Award
US Senator Barbara Mikulski Maryland (moved to Montgomery Medal)
General Mark Welsh III Texas
Gen Bohac made a motion to award the Harry S. Truman award to General Mark Welsh.
Gen Brubaker seconded.
Discussion followed to move Sen Mikulski to the Montgomery Award
Motion Carried.
G.V. “Sonny” Montgomery Award
Northern Nevada Int’l Center Nevada (moved to Patrick Henry)
US Senator Jon Tester Montana
US Senator Mazie Hirono Hawaii
12
US Senator Barbara Mikulski Maryland (moved from Truman Award)
Gen Hansen made a motion that the Montgomery Award be given to all three Senators. It
was also suggested that Northern Nevada International Center be moved to the Patrick
Henry Award category. Gen Fago seconded. Motion carried.
Charles Dick Medal of Merit
State Senator Sue Crawford Nebraska
Governor Maggie Hassan New Hampshire
Governor Susana Martinez New Mexico
US Senator Brian Schatz Hawaii
Governor Eddie B. Calvo Guam
Governor Lawrence Hogan Maryland (attending our conference)
Governor Rick Scott Florida
Patrick Henry Award Sean Callahan Hawaii (staffer for Mark Takai)
Chaz Johnson Minnesota
Neil McKiernan Connecticut
Glenna Smith Nevada
Representative Chris Whitmire North Carolina
Leigh Leilani Graham Guam
William Kraus - Mission BBQ Maryland
Superintendent Jillian Balow Wyoming
Congressman Joe Heck Nevada
BG Robert Herbert Nevada
Northern Nevada Int’l Center Nevada (moved from Montgomery Medal)
Distinguished Service Medal BG William D. DeHaes Iowa
CW5 John C. Vitt Arizona
COL Felix Castagnola Nevada
MG Augustus Collins Mississippi
Meritorious Service Award
BG (Ret) Harold (Hal) Keistler Illinois
COL (Ret) James A. Smith Illinois
MAJ Neils C. Barner Oregon
1st LT. Ashley Klase Ohio
CPT Matthew B. Schneider Illinois
MAJ Jeffrey Zetzer Ohio
COL Glenda Mathurin-Lee Virgin Islands
MG (Ret) William Cobetto Illinois
LT COL Mayb Sersland Maryland
CW4 (Ret) Jack Scarbrough Arkansas
13
Meritorious Service Award
MAJ Steve Bohl North Dakota
CPT Linden E. Allen Illinois
Valley Forge Cross for Heroism
1st LT Jonathon W. Morales Indiana
SMSgt Jeff Ginther California
PV1 Jesse Hernandez California
SGT Kyle Stephens Nevada
SPC Michael Knight Nevada
SFC Michael G. Long California
TSgt Erich Sanford Wisconsin
SPC Jonathan M. Sweeney Oregon
Valley Forge Certificate
CW3 Nathan Champion California
MSgt Terry Kots Nevada
Theodore Roosevelt Leadership Award for Company Grade Officers
Capt Brandon Cochran Iowa
Capt Joseph Smith New Hampshire
1Lt Joshua Sprague Iowa
Capt Jennifer Vogt Kansas
Capt Mathew Blackburn Ohio
Capt Christopher Blair North Carolina
Capt James M. Bunyard Mississippi
Capt Donald Crandell Nevada
Capt Eric R. Dunford Wisconsin
Capt Janelle T. Guillebeau Arkansas
Capt Jeff Hovdenes North Dakota
Capt Robert R. McCoy Arkansas
Capt Michael Schiemer Nevada
1Lt Dominic J. Thornberg Oregon
CPT Ubaldo Nieves Wisconsin
CPT Phillip Patti Ohio
Garde National Trophy
Lt Col Eric A. Schadler Oregon
Eagle Rising Award for Warrant Officers
CW2 Travis Jacobs Kansas
CW3 Lloyd Allen Nevada
CW2 Linda Horton North Carolina
CW3 Galen Roness North Dakota
CW2 James L. Stanley Arkansas
CW2 Sarah L. Smith Mississippi
14
CW3 Bernard L. Aguon Guam
John said the Board could add names at this time that they deemed worthy.
Gen Hargett reminded the Chairwoman that it is customary to award one Truman and one
Montgomery Award. He commented that Gen Robinson might nominate Gen Collins for
the highest award we can give him. Gen Robinson said he would do that.
Gen Brubaker asked Gen Hargett his thoughts on why we are giving those extra awards
this year. Gen Hargett said the Board will vote to give only one of each award.
Gen Ashenhurst entertained a motion to accept the slate of awardees as amended. Gen
Hansen so moved. Gen Brubaker seconded. Motion carried.
Gen Ashenhurst entertained an amended motion to accept the slate of awardees with the
inclusion of adding MG Leon Collins to the awardees for the Distinguished Service
Award. Gen Bohac seconded. Motion carried.
Brig Gen Murray Hansen - Resolutions Update
Gen Hansen reported they are working as they do this time of year to get all the inputs
from the states. There are a few more states who have not had their conferences but they
have advanced copies of their resolutions to meet the July timeline.
They have encountered over the years that the resolution lists get too large, so
conversations have been started to review these resolutions and to try to thin out the ones
that are no longer relevant or applicable to make the list more credible.
The intent on the Air side is to look at the resolutions with the Task Force Chairs and Leg
Staff to bring those recommendations to the committee at conference. Grace is also
doing this on the Joint resolutions side to also present at the conference.
They are on track with no big issues.
Audit Committee Report - Brig Gen (Ret) Robert Hamrick
Gen Hamrick met with Auditors, Rick Castro and Natalie Anzzolin on June 24th here at
NGAUS from Thompson Greenspon. Committee members attending teleconference;
COL Leckel, Major Brownell; Gen Hoyer was not able to participate.
Overall Audit results:
• Audits are “risk-based,” focusing on areas with the highest potential for risks and
items to be corrected, i.e., investments, cash, etc.
• Unqualified/”clean” audit opinion
• 5 reports issued
– NGAUS (membership association and building operations)
– Building operating expense audit
– NGAUS Insurance Trust
15
– National Guard Educational Foundation
– Consolidated Financial (all entities)
-- Accounting department prepared for audit
– Audit progressed smoothly
– TG prepared tax returns, awaiting approval
Required Communications:
• Internal control letter: no weaknesses noted in internal control that require
communication
• Governance letter: standard communication - no issues
Looking Ahead:
• TG noted “revenue recognition” is an emerging issue among non-profits and will be
an item to consider/address in coming years
• TG suggested NGAUS Staff ensure separation of duties within our internal controls
continues to be emphasized when we bring on-board our new employee within the
finance and accounting department
Final Remarks:
• Third consecutive year where the overall NGAUS audit report has yielded
“Unqualified/“Clean” audit opinions”
He asked Mr. Castro how we compared to other Non-Profits?
• He said TG provides similar services for ~ 70 Non-profits … would rate NGAUS
internal controls in the top 10% - if not top 5% - of that group
• Thanks to COL (Ret) Patty O’Connell and Ms. Cheryl Young for their pre-audit
preparations and diligent efforts in our on-going accounting processes
Gen Hamrick said in the March Board meeting he was identified as the Compliance Officer. He
took the opportunity while here to introduce himself to as many folks as he could in various
offices at NGAUS.
Gen made a motion to accept the report as submitted. Gen Ross seconded. Motion carried.
Gen Ross commented that it is the duty of the Board to always pay close attention to the audit
reports. He said the audit is where there is a potential for problems, like lawsuits and complaints,
will arise. It is the responsibility of the Board to make sure an organization is independently
reviewed and clean financially which requires a lot of work. He commented that the audit
committee is doing a great job and are taking a lot of responsibility to make sure we get a clean
and unqualified opinion.
Membership Update—Laura Roznosky Laura reported membership is currently at 49%. Between July and September we usually have
an uptick of about 2%. There is a possibility we will get back to where we were last year at 52%.
16
Gil is currently working some additional memberships that will most likely add to the percentage
Gen Hargett said this year we have 120 more members that at this point last year.
Laura said the Active Life and Retired Life members have gone up. The Active Annual
membership is slightly lower. We are up members as well as our strength.
Gen Hargett said our strength has not gone up. He said the numbers we are using to calculate
percentages are based on what people from the states are sending us and in almost all cases they
are wrong. He said they go the SIPERs to get their numbers. He will be addressing that with the
ED’s this year to see how we can clean that up. He said our target number is probably way down
than what is reported.
Laura said the Membership Committee also has concerns about the strength number also. She is
interested in revamping how we collect data submission.
Gen Robinson asked if there is a way the Bureau could give us the overall point in time of
officers and warrant officers in the National Guard.
Gen Hargett said SIPERS is the problem. He said the problem is when someone is discharged
they do not get dropped for 12-14 months. He said when we do a cut-off date on Dec 31 and we
use SIPERS and if you don’t go back and scrub that list at the state level then all those numbers
will be included in that. He said we have to figure out how the states and ED’s scrub their list.
He said we also have to look at how to get the new accessions on the list.
Laura said ND was the only state to drop from the 100% state list.
Some states have opted out of using the online process for membership
Gen Hargett said the people who have increased their memberships are full participants in our
system. He said the only one who is a non-participant that has increased is Utah.
Gen Hargett gave Gen Bohac credit for his state membership increase as well as New Mexico.
Gen Hargett commented at the importance of looking where our upcoming conferences will be
over the next three out of four years plus the membership difference now and when they were
selected to host the conference. He said he has always been opposed to putting a percentage on
how we award the conferences, but we ought to look seriously at who is awarded the conferences
and their ability support the association.
Laura said they have talked about a date type of fee that could contribute to the overall
membership percentage. CA, NY and TX are all on the decrease list which hurts the overall
number as well.
Gen Hargett commented that if you look at where the division Head Quarters in the ARNG are
located, and look at the worst states we have as far as membership, with the exception of IN and
17
KS, you will find the worst membership in the Guard in those division states. He thinks there
may be a correlation to that.
Gen Brubaker asked who makes the decision as to whether the states do the full or partial
participation. Gen Hargett said the state association makes the decision.
Gen Brubaker asked how we influence that.
Gen Hargett said he would like to look at a state that is marketing NGAUS membership and if
they refuse to participate, with a Board decision, we should market membership and potentially
bypass the state association. We have to figure out how we reach all eligible members.
Gen Hargett asked Laura to give him a list of every General Officers who were members last
year but are not this year. He sent personal emails to those people. Almost everyone has
responded that either no one told them their dues were due or they did not know they weren’t a
member, or thought they were a member or that they had paid their association. He said there
were two states every GO in those states were not members of the association including the
TAG’s; when he reached out to those TAGs both had paid their dues. He said we have cleaned
up this week most of those GO’s. It is only because he sent them emails, otherwise it is not
happening in the states.
Gen Robinson said he is convinced there are some states where the association is just not
functioning. Gen Hargett agreed. Gen Robinson said that in those states with big numbers, he
doesn’t know that we can do anything to help those states get themselves back together in the
short term. He said he would be in support of going directly (in some selected) states to work
membership. He said we couldn’t do any worse than the state associations are doing right now.
Gen Hargett said that is his thought and we should be selective with the states we want to reach
out to, as well as talk to the state associations.
Mike Strum said they have tried to change the focus in NGEDA. Their number one priority is to
build the NGAUS membership. They want to meet with Laura, Gen Hargett and the
Membership Committee and make that the focus at NGEDA in Louisville, in January.
Gen Hargett said he thinks NGEDA is making some strides, but we have to be in it together. He
said there may even be states where NGEDA in not connected to the state.
Laura said we do not have the option to contact the non-participating states to ask them to join.
Gen Hargett said he was asked why we do not send out reminders and the person asking was
shocked we have the ability to do that.
Laura said she understands why some people are reluctant to join and she has no interest in
involving a 100% state. What is frustrating is not being able to reach out to the states like TX,
CA, NY without permission from the state.
18
Laura said the Joint function is finally online. They are still working out some of the kinks and
getting follow-up done. They are developing an Icon and a banner on each state’s website. They
are also working on a renewal notice for all participating states.
Conference Update - Jake Jakubek
Jake said the Business sessions and expo are on the same floor and the meeting rooms are on
level 300.
He said the schedule of events is on the website, which is kept up to date.
The Board of Directors meeting will be Friday September 9th. More information will follow on
this.
Gen Ashenhurst said that because we hold the meeting at the conference, NGAUS will pay the
way for the board members. They will be paid for two hotel nights and their registration fee.
She said if members do not attend the meeting, NGAUS will not pay for them. She reminded
members to book the airfare NLT 30 days in advance.
Jake said Saturday is the Ribbon Cutting, opening of the Exhibit Hall and the first business
session. Sunday is the second business session and Monday the third session, with the States
Dinner that evening.
Jake said the schedule will be fluid with the possibility of both Presidential candidates attending.
Jake said at this point, registration is low but sholud pick up after some of the suspense dates are
met.
Baltimore is working any/all security issues, to include the hotels.
Jake said they are working to hold the host state responsible for the terms they agreed to when
the accepted the bid to host the conference.
John Goheen - Speaker Update
John said the Secretary of the Air Force is scheduled on the first day, along with the Chief of
Staff of the Army. They are dissuading any presidential candidates from speaking that first day.
John said Gen Hargett has spoken with Gen Kadavy and the ARNG was a clean sweep in some
of the major soldier competitions this year. Gen Kadavy will try to get the recipients of these
awards to come to the conference that first day, or a representative group of them to be
recognized by the new CNGB.
Gen Lengyel will speak on the second day to the town hall meeting. He will speak first to the
company grade officers on Saturday morning.
Gen Punaro will speak on Sunday or Monday.
19
John is working on putting together a congressional panel like last year with Senators Graham
and Leahy, if they can’t make it. Senator Ernst would like to attend as well. The panel will
consist of one Republican and one Democrat.
The new Chief of Staff of the Air Force has also been invited, as has the new Commander of
NORTHCOM and EUCOM.
John said in past years, we have worked with the Presidential candidates but do not know if they
are coming until a week or two weeks out. We have had a Presidential candidate every year
since 1992. John said the candidates are aware of that fact. He said the September 11th weekend
should be a coveted spot, and should be some place they would want to come. In past years what
happens is we let them know our business sessions schedule and they choose the date. We are
expecting Governor Hogan to speak also.
John said for the Army Breakout we have invited the two star representative to USERA, who
will come to speak.
Gen Abrams, FORCOM Commander will also come to speak. Gen Kadavy will speak at one of
the business sessions as well.
John said they will have the NGAUS conference ready to go by 15 August.
Gen Hargett said we have received some emails from our members from both political sides to
discourage us inviting one or the other party candidate. Our answer to that is that we are a non-
partisan organization and we listen to both sides.
Gen Robinson asked about the NGB Conference letter. Gen Hargett said it is the same as last
year but based on money not people to manage within the states money.
Taskers:
Conference Committee will ensure that SOPs are developed for conference activity -
Complete for 2016 (remains as a reminder)
Ask the Conference Committee to look at new cost-saving models for the conference.
o TAG & LDL Reception – Ongoing (Gen Bohac not ready to report) He will assist
in working that task to completion.
All NGAUS SOP’s should be reviewed and updated as required and suggest they report
every November - Reminder
Complete a NGAUS Staff salary review – Ongoing
Gen Ross said the salary review has been completed. They talked to three different companies.
They will brief it in November. He said there is nothing dramatic and we are in pretty good
shape.
Gen Fago asked if it has been completed and implemented.
20
Gen Hargett said it will not be implemented until the next budget. All the new standardized job
descriptions have been done and implemented. The study and ranges have also been done but if
there are people who are on the low end, the money is not available at mid-year to implement
those salaries. The Finance Committee recommended we will address it in the next budget.
Gen Ross said there were no huge problems and everything was manageable.
Gen Ashenhurst thanked the members for their participation and look forward to seeing them at
the conference.
Gen Ashenhurst reminded the members the Insurance Trust meeting will began at 1400 and the
NGEF meeting begins at 1500.
Gen Hansen made a motion to adjourn. Gen Brubaker seconded. Motion carried.