MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
Transcript of MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
1/57
10-1
Activity- and
Strategy-BasedResponsibility
Accounting
CHAPTER
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
2/57
10-2
1. Compare and contrast functional-based,
activity-based, and strategic-based
responsibility accounting systems.
2. Explain process value analysis.
3. Describe activity performance measurement.
4. Discuss the basic features of theBalanced
Scorecard.
Objectives
After studying this
chapter, you should
be able to:
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
3/57
10-3
Responsibility
Accounting Model
Assigning responsibility
Establishing performancemeasures or benchmarks
Evaluating performance
Assigning rewards
The responsibility accounting modelis
defined by four essential elements:
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
4/57
10-4
Functional-based
Activity-based
Strategic-based
Types of Responsibility
Accounting
Management accounting offers thefollowing three types of responsibilityaccounting systems.
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
5/57
10-5
A functional-based responsibil i ty accounting systemassigns responsibility to organizational units and
expresses performance measures in financial terms.
Functional-
Based ResponsibilityAccounting System
It is the responsibility accounting system that
was developed when most firms were
operating in relatively stable environments.
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
6/57
10-6
Elements of a
Functional-Based
ResponsibilityAccounting System
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
7/57
10-7
Responsibility Is
Defined
Individual
in Charge
Operating
Efficiency
Financial
OutcomesUnit
Budgets
Static
Standards
Standard
Costing
Currently
Attainable Stds.Financial
Efficiency
Actual vs.
Standard
Controllable
CostsFinancial
Measures
Performance Measures
Are Established
Performance Is
Measured
Individuals Are
Rewarded Based on
Financial Performance
Profit
Sharing
Promotions Bonuses
Salary
Increases
Organizational
Unit
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
8/57
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
9/57
10-9
Elements of an
Activity-Based
ResponsibilityAccounting System
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
10/57
10-10
Responsibility Is
Defined
Team
Value Chain
Optimal
Process
Oriented
Dynamic
Value-
AddedTime
Reductions
Cost
Reductions
Quality
ImprovementTrend
Measures
Performance Measures
Are Established
Performance Is
Measured
Individuals Are Rewarded
Based on Multidimensional
Performance
Gain-
Sharing
Promotions Bonuses
Salary
Increases
Financial
Process
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
11/57
10-11
Strategy-
Based Responsibility
Accounting System
A strategic-based responsibil i ty accounting system
(Balanced Scorecard)translates the mission andstrategy of an organization into operational objectivesand measures for four different perspectives:
The financial perspective
The customer perspective
The process perspective
The infrastructure (learning and
growth) perspective
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
12/57
10-12
Elements of a
Strategy-Based
ResponsibilityAccounting System
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
13/57
10-13
Responsibility Is
Defined
Financial
Process
Communica-
tion Strategy
Alignment of
Objectives
Balanced
Measures
Link to
StrategyFinancial
Measures
Process
Measures
Customer
MeasuresInfrastructure
Measures
Performance Measures
Are Established
Performance Is
Measured
Individuals Are Rewarded
Based on Multidimensional
PerformanceGain-
Sharing
Promotions Bonuses
Salary
Increases
Infrastructure
Customer
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
14/57
10-14
Activity-based management (ABM)is a systemwide,
integrated approach that focuses managements attention
on activities with the objective of improving customervalue and the profit achieved by providing this value.
Activity-Based Management
(ABM)
Activity-based management encompasses both
product costing and process value analysis.
The activity-based management model has two
dimension: a cost dimensionand a process
dimension.
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
15/57
10-15
Cost Dimension
Activity-Based Management Model
Resources
Process Dimension
Driver
Analysis
Why?
Performance
Analysis
How well?
Products
and
Customers
Activities
What?
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
16/57
10-16
Process value analysisis fundamental to activity-based
responsibility accounting, focuses on accountability for
activities rather than costs, and emphasizes the
maximization of systemwide performance instead ofindividual performance.
Process Value Analysis
Process value analysis is concerned with:
Driver analysis
Activity analysis
Activity performance measurement
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
17/57
10-17
Activity Analysis
Activity analysisis the process of identifying, describing,
and evaluating the activities an organization performs.
Activi ty analysisshould produce four outcomes:
What activities are done.
How many people perform the activities.
The time and resources are required to performthe activities.
An assessment of the value of the activities to
the organization.
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
18/57
10-18
Those activities necessary to
remain in business are calledvalue-added activities.
Value-
Added
Activities
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
19/57
10-19
Activities needed to comply
with the reporting
requirements, such as the
SEC, are value-added by a
mandate.
Value-
AddedActivities
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
20/57
10-20
A discretionary activi tyis classified as value-added
provided it simultaneously satisfies three conditions:
Value-Added
Activities
The activity produces a change of state.
The change of state was not achievable by
preceding activities.
The activity enables other activities to be
performed.
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
21/57
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
22/57
10-22
Nonvalue-
AddedActivities
Scheduling
Moving
Waiting Inspecting
Storing
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
23/57
10-23
Activi ty Analysis
Activity elimination
Activity selection
Activi ty reduction
Activi ty sharing
Activity Analysis Can Reduce Costs in Four Ways:
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
24/57
10-24
Efficiency
Quality
Time
Measures of Activity
Performance
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
25/57
10-25
Measures of Activi ty Performance
Financial measures of activityefficiency include:
Value and nonvalue-
added activity cost
reports
Trends in activity cost
reports
Kaizen standard setting
Benchmarking
Life-cycle costing
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
26/57
10-26
Value- and Nonvalue-Added
Cost Reporting
Activity Activity Driver SQ AQ SP
Welding Welding hours 10,000 8,000 $40
Rework Rework hours 0 10,000 9
Setups Setup hours 0 6,000 60
Inspection Number of inspections 0 4,000 15
Value-added
standards call for
their elimination
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
27/57
10-27
Value- and Nonvalue-Added
Cost Reporting
Activity Activity Driver SQ AQ SP
Welding Welding hours 10,000 8,000 $40
Rework Rework hours 0 10,000 9
Setups Setup hours 0 6,000 60
Inspection Number of inspections 0 4,000 15
Value-added
standards call for
their elimination
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
28/57
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
29/57
10-29
Welding $400,000 $ - 80,000 $320,000
Rework 0 90,000 90,000
Setups 0 360,000 360,000
Inspection 0 60,000 60,000
Total $400,000 $430,000 $830,000
Value- and Nonvalue-
Added Cost ReportValue-Added Nonvalue- Actual
Activity Costs Added Costs Costs
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
30/57
10-30
Welding -$80,000 $ 50,000 $ 30,000
Rework 90,000 70,000 20,000
Setups 360,000 200,000 160,000
Inspection 60,000 35,000 25,000Total $430,000 $355,000 $235,000
Nonvalue-Added Costs
Activity 2003 2004 Change
Trend Report: Nonvalue-Added Costs
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
31/57
10-31
The Role of Kaizen Standards
Kaizen costingis concerned withreducing the costs of existing
products and processes.
Controll ing this cost reduction process is
accomplished through the repeti tive useof two major subcycles:
(1) the kaizen or continuous
improvement cycle, and
(2) the maintenance cycle.
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
32/57
10-32
Act
Kaizen Cost Reduction Process
Do Do
Kaizen Subcycle Maintenance
Subcycle
Check
Plan
Search
Check
Act
StandardLock in
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
33/57
10-33
Benchmarking uses best
practices as the standard forevaluating activity
performance.
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
34/57
10-34
Activity Capacity Management
Activi ty capacityis
the number of times
an activity can be
performed.
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
35/57
10-35
AQ = Activity capacity acquired (practical capacity)
SQ = Activity capacity that should be used
AU = Actual usage of the activity
SP = Fixed activity rate
SP x SQ
$2,000 x 0
$0Activity
Volume Variance
$120,000 U
Unused
Capacity Variance
$40,000 F
Activity Capacity Variance
SP x AQ
$2,000 x 60$120,000
SP x AU
$2000 x 40$80,000
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
36/57
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
37/57
10-37
Target Costing
A target costis the difference between the sales price
needed to capture a predetermined market share and the
desired per-unit profit.
Example: Current product specifications and thetargeted market share call for a sales priceof $250,000. The required profit is $50,000
per unit. The target cost is computed asfollows:
$250,000$50,000 = $200,000
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
38/57
10-38
Target Cost
Target PriceMarket Share
Objective
Product
Functionality
Target Profit
Product and
Process Design
Target
Cost Met?
NO
Produce Profit
YES
Target-
Costing
Model
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
39/57
10-39
Unit Cost and Price Information for New Product
Unit production cost $ 6
Unit life-cycle cost 10
Unit whole-life cost 12
Budgeted unit selling price 15
Life-Cycle Costing: Budgeted
Costs and Income
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
40/57
10 41
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
41/57
10-41
2003 ---- -$200,000 -$200,000 -$200,000
2004 $600,000 -320,000 280,000 80,000
2005 900,000 -480,000 420,000 500,000
Annual Cumulative
Year Revenues Costs Income Income
Budgeted Product Income Statements
10 42P f R t f
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
42/57
10-42Performance Report for
L ife-Cycle Costs
2003 Development $190,000 $200,000 $10,000 F
2004 Production 300,000 240,000 60,000 U
Logistics 75,000 80,000 5,000 F
2005 Production 435,000 360,000 75,000 U
Logistics 110,000 120,000 10,000 F
Analysis: Production costs were higher than expected because
insertions of diodes and integrated circuits also drive costs (bothproduction and postpurchase costs).
Conclusion: The design of future products should try to
minimize total insertions.
Year Item Actual Costs Budgeted Costs Variance
10 43
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
43/57
10-43
The
Balanced
Scorecard
The Balanced Scorecardtranslates
an organizations mission and
strategy into operational objectivesand performance measures for four
different perspectives:
The financial perspective
The customer perspective
The internal business
process perspective
The learning and growth
perspective
10 44
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
44/57
10-44
Strategy, according to Robert Kaplan and
David Norton, is defined as
. . . choosing the market and customer
segments the business unit intends to serve,
identifying the critical internal and business
processes that the unit must excel at to
deliver the value propositions to customers
in the targeted market segments, and
selecting the individual and organizationalcapabilities required for the internal,
customer, and financial objectives.
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
45/57
10 46
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
46/57
10-46
Testable Strategy
Illustrated
Quality
Training
Infra-
structure
Redesign
Products
Process
Reduce
Defective
Units
Increase
Customer
Satisfaction
Customer
Increase
Market
Share
Increase SalesFinancial Increase Profits
10 47
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
47/57
10-47
Summary of Objectives and Measures:
Financial Perspective
Objectives Measures
Revenue Growth:
Increase the number of new Percentage of revenue
products from new products
Create new applications Percentage of repeat
customers
Develop new customers and Percentage of revenue from
markets new sourcesAdopt a new pricing strategy Product and customer
profitability
10 48
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
48/57
10-48
Objectives MeasuresCost Reduction:
Reduce unit product cost Unit product cost
Reduce unit customer cost Unit customer cost
Reduce distribution channel cost Cost per distribution channel
Asset Uti l ization:
Improve asset utilization Return on investmentEconomic value added
10 -49
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
49/57
10-49
Summary of Objectives and Measures:
Customer PerspectiveObjectives Measures
Core:
Increase market share Market share (percentage of
market)Increase customer retention Percentage of repeat
customers
Increase customer acquisition Number of new customers
Increase customer satisfaction Ratings from customer
surveysIncrease customer profitability Customer profitability
10 -50
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
50/57
10-50
Objectives Measures
Performance Value:Decrease price Price
Decrease postpurchase costs Postpurchase costs
Improve product functionality Ratings from customer
surveysImprove product quality Percentage of returns
Increase delivery reliability On-time delivery percentage
Aging schedule
Improve product image and Ratings from customer
reputation surveys
10 -51
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
51/57
10 51
Actual Conversion Cost per Unit
Standard costs per minute = $1,600,000/400,000
= $4 per minuteActual cycle time = 60 minutes/10 units
= 6 minutes per unit
Actual conversion costs = $4 x 6= $24 per unit
Theoretical Conversion Cost per Unit
Theoretical cycle time = 60 minutes/12 units
= 5 minutes per unitTheoretical conversion
costs = $4 x 5
= $20 per unit
10 -52
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
52/57
10 52
Summary of Objectives and Measures:
Process PerspectiveObjectives Measures
Innovation:
Increase the number of new Number of new products vs.
products plannedIncrease proprietary products Percentage of revenue from
proprietary products
Decrease new product Time to market (from start
development time to finish)
10 -53
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
53/57
10 53
Objectives Measures
Operations:
Increase product quality Quality costsOutput yields
Percentage of defective units
Increase process efficiency Unit cost trends
Output/input(s)
Decrease process time Cycle time and velocity
MCE
Postsales Service:
Increase service quality First-pass yields
Increase service efficiency Cost trendsOutput/input(s)
Decrease service time Cycle time
10 -54
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
54/57
10 54
Summary of Objectives and Measures:
Learning and Growth PerspectiveObjectives Measures
Increase employee capabilities Employee satisfaction ratings
Employee turnover percentage
Employee productivity(revenue/employee)
Hours of training
Strategic job coverage ratio
(percentage of critical job
requirements filled)
10-55
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
55/57
Objectives MeasuresIncrease motivation and Suggestions per employee
alignment Suggestions implemented per
employee
Increase information systems Percentage of processes withcapabilities real-time feedback
capabilities
Percentage of customer-facing
employees with on-line
access to customer andproduct information
10-56
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
56/57
The End
Chapter Ten
10-57
-
8/12/2019 MAHM6e Ch10.Ab.az
57/57