LysarkKaasa2008
-
Upload
lim-teck-huat -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of LysarkKaasa2008
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 1/36
Classification: Internal Status: Draft
Glycol injection and processing
Course: TPG 4140 NATURGASS
Date: 16.10.2008
Baard Kaasa, StatoilHydro
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 2/36
2
Introduction – flow assurance
PipelineHigh temp Low temp
Water condensation
Low T high P
Hydrates
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 3/36
3
Introduction – flow assurance
Snøhvit pipelineHigh temp Low temp
MEG injection – prevents hydrates
CO2 Low pH ~4
Corrosion
NaOH/NaHCO3
High pH ~6-7
Formation water?
3
2
3
2CaCOCOCa =+
−+
SCALE
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 4/36
4
A typical MEG loop
Pipeline
MEG injection l ine
Lean MEG
MEG: 90 wt%Rate: 150-200 m3/d
Rich MEG
MEG: 60 wt%
Rate: 220-300 m3/d
Water
Condensed water: 70-100 m3/d
Formation water: 0-10 m3/d
Process plant withMEG regeneration
Water and waste
Rate: 70-110 m3/d
Wells
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 5/36
5
Introduction – MEG processing• Separation/filtration/centrifuges/settling
– MEG is viscous, slow settling, clogs filters
– Particles may be very small. (Especially corrosion products)
• Scale/plugging
– Scaling in heat exchangers (typical carbonates)
– Sedimentation – salt will settle and may plug of flow is low
• Hydrocarbons - Dissolve in rich MEG
– Hydrocarbons in reflux water
– Hydrocarbons in reflux drum and other vessels
– Extra load on vacuum system
• Corrosion
– A lot of CO2 is released – low pH in vacuum system
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 6/36
6
Overview• Flow assurance
– Hydrate
– Water equilibria
– Corrosion
– Scale
– Thermodynamics of MEG mixtures
• Glycol processing
– Pre treatment
– Water removal (regeneration)
– Salt removal (reclamation)
– Waste handling
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 7/36
7
Hydrates• Hydrate is water in a solid structure with small gas molecules in cavities
– Forms at low temperature and high pressure
• Water will form hydrates if the chemical potential of water in the hydrate form is
lower than that of free water • Requirements for hydrate formation
– Free water
– Small gas molecules (N2, CO2, CH4, C2,C3,…)
– Low temperature – High pressure
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 8/36
8
Hydrate phase diagramHydrate equilibrium curve
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 5 10 15 20 25
Temperature (°C)
P r e s s u
r e ( b a r )
Hydrats can form
Hydrats can NOT form
Equilbrium curve
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 9/36
9
Hydrate prevention• Hydrate formation reaction (simplified)
• Chemical potential
– If reaction will go
• Chemical potential of gas is mainly given by pressure and temperature and cannormally not be changed
• Chemical potential of hydrate can not be changed
• Chemical potential of water
– If we dilute water to get xH2O lower, the chemical potential of water will belower and the reaction is shiftet to the left -> no hydrates
( ) ( )hyd O H gaslO H 22
↔+
2 2
hyd l
H O H O gas
μ μ μ μ Δ = − −0μ Δ <
2 2 2 2 2 2
ln lnl
H O H O H O H O H O H O RT a RT xμ μ μ γ = + = +o o
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 10/36
10
Hydrate prevention – diluting the water • Hydrates can be prevented with “anything” that reduces the molefraction of
water Hydrate inhibition effect
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Molefraction inhibitor
D e c r e a s e i n H y d r a
t e t e m p e r a t u r e ( C )
dT MeOH
dT Ethylene Glycol
dT Diethylene Glycol
Nielsen and Bucklin
( )72 ln 1 InhibT xΔ = − −
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 11/36
11
Lean MEG injection rate - Example• A pipeline transports gas and water condenses: 100 m3/d
• How much lean MEG (90 wt%) must be injected to keep MEG concentrationabove 60 wt%?
• Assumption: Density of water and MEG = 1000 kg/m3
– We want:
– Inserting lean MEG
– Rearranging
– Rich MEG volume
2
0.6 MEG
MEG H O
V
V V =
+
0.90.60.9 0.1
LM
LM Cond LM
V V V V
=+ +
( )
0.62
0.9 0.6
Cond LM Cond
V V V = =
−
Total water:Condensed water + water in lean MEG
3 RM Cond V V =
Lean MEG:
Lean in water – 90 wt%
Rich MEG:
Rich in water – 40-70 wt%
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 12/36
12
Water vapour pressure• Injection of MEG will “dry” the gas phase
– Addition of MEG reduces molefraction of water in the aqueous phase• Water has less tendency to go to other phases – same as for hydrate inhibition
– Question: How much is the water content of the gas reduced if MEG
concentration is 60 wt%: MwH2O=18 mole, MwMEG=62 g/mole
– Answer : Assume 1 kg, 600 gram MEG, 400 gram water
MEG: 600/62=9.68 molesH2O: 400/18=22.2 moles
Vapour pressure of water is reduced with 30%
2 2 2 2 H O tot H O H O H o y P P x P= =
o
2
2
2
22.2
0.7022.2 9.68
H O
H O
H O MEG
n
x n n= = =+ +
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 13/36
13
Corrosion• Long pipelines: Carbon steel
• Condensed water has no buffer capacity
– CO2 in gas -> pH=3.5 - 4.5
• After startup on Kollsnes they produced about 20 tonns of iron!
– Plugged: Heat exchangers, separators, filters, centrifuges etc.
Corrosion
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 14/36
14
pH stabilization
• Increase pH in pipeline
– Add NaOH or NaHCO3 to lean MEG
– Higher pH – less corrosive – Formation of FeCO3 protective film
2 3 NaOH CO NaHCO+ =
Kollsnes pH stabilization
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 15/36
15
Scale
• Scale means precipitation of salt onto a surface
• Main types of scale:
– Sulphates• BaSO4, CaSO4 ,CaSO4*2H2O, SrSO4
– Carbonates• CaCO3, FeCO3
– Other
• NaCl, NaHCO3, FeS, HgS
• Scale will:
– Block pipelines and heat exchangers
– Fill separators – Reduce heat transfer in exchangers
– Valves etc. can get stuck
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 16/36
16
Scale formation mechanisms
• Sulphate, chloride
• Mainly dependent on: – Ion concentrations
– Temperature
• Forms typically
– When formation water and seawaterare mixed
– Formation water: Ca2+, Ba2+, Sr 2+
– Seawater: SO42-
• Carbonates, sulphides
• Mainly dependent on: – pH
– Ion concentration
– Temperature
• Forms typically
– Pressure reduction• CO2 evaporates, pH increases
– Temperature increase• Lower solubil ity, CO2 goes off
2 2
4 4 Ba SO BaSO+ −
+ = 2 2
3 3Ca CO CaCO+ −
+ =
2
2 3 3CO H HCO H CO
+ − + −
→ + → +Increasing pH
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 17/36
17
Saturation ratio
• Reaction:
• Equilibrium:
– Solubility product. At equilibrium, the product of the ion concentrations is aconstant
• Ksp is a funct ion of temperature and pressure (and non-ideal behaviour)
• Saturation ratio
– Tells if a salt is supersaturated and can precipitate
( )( )
Na Cl
sp
m mSR NaCl
K NaCl
+ −
=
Na Cl NaCl+ −
+ =
( )sp Na ClK NaCl m m+ −=
SR>1 Precipitation can occur SR=1 EquilibriumSR<1 Undersaturated, salt may dissolve
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 18/36
18
Salt solubility in MEG systems
• MEG and water mix completely at all ratios
• The mixture is then the solvent – and it has different properties than water
– Salt solubility is lower in MEG
– Many salts have a low-point at about 70-80 wt% MEG
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
w t% MEG
S o l u b i l i t y
[ m
]
Model-NaCl
Literature-NaCl
model-KCl
Literature-KCl
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
molfract ion MEG
C a
l c i t e
S o l u b i l i t y
[ m
m
o l / K g
]
25C
60C
80C
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 19/36
19
Gas solubil ity in MEG
• Solubility of CO2 and CH4 in MEG. PCO2=PCH4=1 bar, T=20°C
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 20 40 60 80 100
MEG (w t%)
C O 2 s o l u b i l i t y ( m m o l / k g )
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
C H 4 s o l u b i l i t y ( m m o l / k g
CO2
CH4
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 20/36
20
pH in the MEG solutions
• pH in MEG solutions is difficult to measure because
– The pH scale in MEG is different from water
– MEG has effect on the pH electrode – changes the measured pH
– Calibration buffers does not contain MEG• Solution
– Calibrate as normal
– Apply correction
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
0 20 40 60 80 100
wt % MEG
p H
Buffer-pH*
Measured-pH
pH pH pH Meas Δ+=*
True pH = Measured + Correction
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 21/36
21
Overview
• Flow assurance
– Hydrate
– Water equilibria
– Corrosion – Scale
– Thermodynamics of MEG mixtures
• Glycol processing
– Pre treatment
– Water removal (regeneration)
– Salt removal (reclamation)
– Waste handling
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 22/36
22
MEG regeneration
Rich MEG MEG regeneration Lean MEG
MEG 50-70 wt%Water
pH stabilizer SaltsCorrosion productsProduction chemicals CI, SIHydrocarbons
MEG 90 wt%
pH stabilizer Production chemicals CI, SI
Water & Waste
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 23/36
23
Pre treatment
• Purpose
– Stabilize MEG
– Remove HC
– Buffer between production and regen – Removal of impurities
• Filtration
• Centrifuges
• Precipitation
• Sedimentation
• Man challenges
– Scale in heat exchanger
– Separation (MEG in condensate, condensate in MEG)
Inlet separator
Degasser
Heater
Rich MEG storage
Gas
Condensate
Condensate
Gas
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 24/36
24
Water removal (regeneration)
Kollsnes Snøhvit
Pressure: 1.1-1.3 bar
Temperature: 140-150°C
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 25/36
25
Salt removal (reclamation)
Snøhvit
Pressure: 0.1-25 bar
Temperature: 110-130°C
Flash
separator
Salt freevapour
Saltfeed
Circulation pump
Heatexchanger
Vacumreciever
Water
Vacumpump
Solids removal
Lean MEG
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 26/36
26
Pre treatment heat exchanger
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 27/36
27
Reclaimer bottom section
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 28/36
28
Cooling water Heat exchanger
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 29/36
29
Sediment tanks
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 30/36
30
Process combinations
• Only regeneration (Kollsnes)
– Removes only water, no salt
– pH stabilizer is conserved
• Full reclamation (Åsgard B, Vega/Gjøa)
– Removes all salt and water
• Partial reclamation (Snøhvit, Ormen Lange)
– A fraction of the MEG is reclaimer
– Upstream (60wt%) or downstream (90wt%)
Salt removal
Reclamation
Water removal
Regeneration
Salt removal
Reclamation
Water removal
Regeneration
Flash
separator
Salt freevapour
Saltfeed
Circulation pump
Heatexchanger
Vacumreciever
Water
Vacumpump
Solids removal
Lean MEG
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 31/36
31
VLE for water-Glycol systems
• Water-Glycol behaves close to ideal – Raults law can be used (within 5%)
2 2 2 H O H O H o
MEG MEG MEG
P x P
P x P
=
=
o
o
Vapour pressure of w ater and MEG
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Temperatur e (°C)
P v a p ( b a r )
PH2O
PMEG
T-functions ln ln *a
P b c T d T T
= + + +o
Comp H2O MEG
a -7875.17 -7878.1
b 86.9198 0.143701
c -11.783 3.72897
d 0.010658 -0.0133992
32
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 32/36
32
Regeneration temperature
• Regeneration
– Liquid composition is known• 90wt% MEG=> xMEG=0.723
– Iterate on temperature
2 2
0.277 0.723tot H O MEG H o MEGP P P P P= + = +
o o
138
140
142
144
146
148
150
152
0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5
Reboile r pressure (bar)
B o i l i n g t e m p e r a t u r e ( ° C
)
ln ln *
aP b c T d T
T = + + +
o
33
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 33/36
33
Reclamation temperature
• Reclamation
– Vapour composition is known (same as feed)• 60 wt% MEG => yMEG=0.3
• Pressure is 0.15 bara (vacuum)• What is temperature?
2
2
0.3
0.7
MEG MEG
tot
H O
H O
tot
P y
P
P yP
= =
= = ( )2 2 2 2
0.3
0.7 1
MEG tot MEG MEG
H O tot H O H O MEG H O
P P x P
P P x P x P
= =
= = = −
o
o o
2
2
0.3 0.7
MEG H O
calc
H O MEG
P PP
P P
=+
o o
o o
2
2
0.3
0.7
tot MEG
MEG
tot H O
H O
P x
P
P x
P
=
=
o
oIterate on temperatureuntil Pcalc=Ptot
=> Eliminate x
34
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 34/36
34
MEG reclamation P-T diagram
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 0 0
1 0 2
1 0 4
1 0 6
1 0 8
1 1 0
1 1 2
1 1 4
1 1 6
1 1 8
1 2 0
1 2 2
1 2 4
1 2 6
1 2 8
1 3 0
Temperature (°C)
w t % M
E G
i n F e e d a n d V a p o u
r
88
90
92
94
96
98
100
w t % M
E G
i n F l a s h S e p L i q u i d
Gas or Feed P=0.1Gas or Feed P=0.12Gas or Feed P=0.14Gas or Feed P=0.16Gas or Feed P=0.18Gas or Feed P=0.2Liq P=0.1Liq P=0.12Liq P=0.14Liq P=0.16Liq P=0.18
Liq P=0.2
Flash sep l iq
Vapour or Feed
35
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 35/36
35
Energy consumption - reclamation
• In a reclaimer, both MEG and water is evaporated
– Example:• Feed: 300 m3/d 60 wt% MEG
• Feed temp: 30°C, boi ling temp, 120°C
– Answer:• MEG 180 m3/d=180 000 kg/d
• H2O 120 m3/d=120 000 kg/d
– Heating from 30 to 120°C• MEG 180 000*3.10*90=5.02*107 kJ/d = 580 kW
• H2O 120 000*4.16*90=4.49*107 kJ/d = 520 kW 1 100 kW
– Vaporization• MEG 180 000*968 =1.74*108 kJ/d = 2 016 kW
• H2O 120 000*2603=3.12*108 kJ/d = 3 615 kW 5 631 kW 6.7 MW
Water MEG
Heat capacity (kJ/kg K) 4.16 3.1Heat of vaporization (kJ/kg) 2603 968
36
8/13/2019 LysarkKaasa2008
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/lysarkkaasa2008 36/36
36
Waste handling
• Water from distillation
– Onshore: Sent to water treatment and then disposed
– Offshore: Disposed
• Salt
– Up to 1.5 tons/d is possible
– Onshore: No good solution, treated as special waste
– Offshore: Dissolved in water from distillation and then disposed
• Problem: High content of heavy and polar hydrocarbons