Life Cycle Assessment of Hand Drying Systems
-
Upload
macthiongo22 -
Category
Documents
-
view
109 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Life Cycle Assessment of Hand Drying Systems
-
LifeCycleAssessmentofHandDryingSystems
September19,2011CommissionedbyDyson,Inc.PreparedbyMaterialsSystemsLaboratoryMassachusettsInstituteofTechnologyTrishaMontalboJeremyGregoryRandolphKirchain
-
2
Contents1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................52 Goalandscope......................................................................................................................................62.1 Goals.............................................................................................................................................62.2 Scope.............................................................................................................................................62.2.1 Functionalunit......................................................................................................................72.2.2 Systemboundary..................................................................................................................82.2.3 Cutoffcriteria.....................................................................................................................11
3 Lifecycleinventoryanalysis................................................................................................................113.1 Billofactivities............................................................................................................................123.1.1 Production:materialsandmanufacturing..........................................................................143.1.2 Use......................................................................................................................................163.1.3 Endoflife............................................................................................................................183.1.4 Transportation....................................................................................................................193.1.5 Dataquality:sensitivityanalysis.........................................................................................19
3.2 Unitprocessinventorydata........................................................................................................203.3 Uncertaintyanalyses...................................................................................................................21
4 Lifecycleimpactassessment..............................................................................................................224.1 Lifecycleimpactassessmentmethodologies.............................................................................224.1.1 Globalwarmingpotential...................................................................................................234.1.2 IMPACT2002+.....................................................................................................................234.1.3 Cumulativeenergydemand................................................................................................244.1.4 Waterconsumptionandlandoccupation..........................................................................25
4.2 Baselineanalysis.........................................................................................................................254.2.1 Resultsbyimpactassessmentmethodology......................................................................254.2.2 Endpointcategorynormalization........................................................................................324.2.3 Rankordercomparison.......................................................................................................33
4.3 Additionalproductlifecycles......................................................................................................334.4 Contributionanalysisforindividualproducts.............................................................................344.4.1 Dryers..................................................................................................................................344.4.2 Cottonrolltowels................................................................................................................37
-
3
4.4.3 Papertowels.......................................................................................................................395 Lifecycleinterpretation......................................................................................................................405.1 Sensitivityanalysis......................................................................................................................415.1.1 Lifetimeusage.....................................................................................................................415.1.2 Manufacturingstageelectricgridmix................................................................................425.1.3 Usephaseelectricgridmix.................................................................................................435.1.4 Useintensity.......................................................................................................................445.1.5 Endoflifescenario.............................................................................................................455.1.6 Dryerelectronicsunitprocess............................................................................................465.1.7 Cottonrolltowelreuses......................................................................................................485.1.8 Pulpmanufacturingprocess...............................................................................................485.1.9 Papertowelmass................................................................................................................495.1.10 Allocationofrecycledcontent............................................................................................505.1.11 Manufacturinglocation.......................................................................................................515.1.12 Uselocation(regionalvariation).........................................................................................52
5.2 Uncertaintyanalyses...................................................................................................................545.2.1 Scenariouncertainty...........................................................................................................545.2.2 Billofactivitiesuncertaintyanalysis...................................................................................61
6 Conclusions.........................................................................................................................................656.1 Keydriversofenvironmentalimpact..........................................................................................656.1.1 Handdryers.........................................................................................................................656.1.2 Cottonrolltowels................................................................................................................656.1.3 Papertowels.......................................................................................................................66
6.2 Sensitivityofresultstoscenariosanddataquality....................................................................666.3 Comparativeassessmentofproductenvironmentalimpact.....................................................676.4 Recommendationsforreducingdryingsystemenvironmentalimpact.....................................686.5 Studylimitations.........................................................................................................................69
7 References..........................................................................................................................................708 Criticalreview.....................................................................................................................................73A Appendices..........................................................................................................................................73A.1 Handdryingsystembillsofactivities.........................................................................................73A.1.1 Energyconsumptioncalculationsfordryerusestage........................................................78
-
4
A.2 Modifiedunitprocessdata.........................................................................................................78A.3 Unitprocessimpactandquality.................................................................................................85A.3.1 Statisticaltests....................................................................................................................85
A.4 Allocationofrecycledcontent....................................................................................................95A.5 NSFP335Protocol.......................................................................................................................96A.6 Comparisonwithexistingstudies...............................................................................................96A.6.1 Dryers..................................................................................................................................96A.6.2 Cottonrolltowels................................................................................................................97A.6.3 Papertowels.......................................................................................................................98
A.7 Supplementalanalyses.............................................................................................................102A.7.1 Warehousing.....................................................................................................................102A.7.2 Regionalvariation:secondarylocations...........................................................................102
A.8 Evaluation.................................................................................................................................107A.8.1 Completenesscheck.........................................................................................................107A.8.2 Sensitivitycheck................................................................................................................108A.8.3 Consistencycheck.............................................................................................................112
-
5
1 IntroductionThequestionoftheenvironmentalimplicationsofthehanddryerversuspapertowelisfacedbymanypeople,asevidencedbyitscoverageinthemedia[15].Assuch,thereareanumberofstudiesthattargetthisparticularquestion,includingastreamlinedlifecycleassessmentconductedforAirdriLtd.andBobrickWashroomEquipmentthatcomparesastandardwarmairdryertopapertowels[6],ahanddryertowelcomparisonproducedbyMyClimateandcommissionedbyDysoninSwitzerland[7],acomparisonbetweencottonrolltowelsandpapertowelscommissionedbyVendor[8],andsomecalculationsmadebytheClimateConservancyforSalon[9].MorecomprehensivelifecycleassessmentsthatcomplywiththeISO14040and14044lifecycleassessmentstandards[10,11]arealsoavailable.TheseincludeastudyfortheEuropeanTextileServicesAssociation(ETSA)thatalsocomparescottonrolltowelstopapertowels[12],anotherinvestigatingmultipletypesoftissueproductsforKimberlyClark[13],andathirdforExcelDryerthatcomparesitsXLERATORhanddryertoastandardwarmairdryerandpapertowels[14].DysonhasalsoconductedalifecycleassessmentofitsDysonAirbladehanddryerinaccordancewiththePAS2050standard[15]inordertoobtainaCarbonReductionLabelfromtheCarbonTrust[16].Amongallthesestudies,onlytheonebyMyClimate[7]comparesalltypesofdryingsystemsahighspeedhandsindryerrepresentedbytheDysonAirbladehanddryer,astandardwarmairdryer,cottonrolltowels,andpapertowels(seeFigure1forimagesofthesedifferentdryingsystems).Itdoesnotincludethehandsundervariantofhighspeeddryers,however.Bycontrast,thereportconductedforExcelDryer[14]includesahighspeedhandsunderdryertheXLERATORhanddryerbutthendoesnotconsiderahighspeedhandsindryerorcottonrolltowels.Andbecauseofthestudiesdifferingfunctionalunits,assumptions,anddata,lifecycleassessmentoutcomescannotbeeasilycompared.Dysoncommissionedthisstudyasameansofaddressingthisgap.Thegoalofthisanalysisistoevaluateandcomparethevarioushanddryingsystemsincludingbothvariantsofhighspeedhanddryersfromthedifferentstudiesbyplacingthesystemsonaconsistentbasis.Lifecycleassessment(LCA)[17,18]isusedtoconductthisstudy.LCAisacomprehensiveframeworkwithalevelofdetailthatrequiresastrictadherencetoaconsistentmethodology.ThismethodologyisarticulatedintheInternationalOrganizationforStandardizationssetofLCAstandardsthatarepartofitsISO14000environmentalmanagementseries.AlifecycleassessmentthatfollowstheLCAstandardsISO14040and14044[10,11]containsfourmainsteps:
Goalandscopedefinitionarticulatestheobjectives,functionalunitunderconsideration,andregionalandtemporalboundariesoftheassessment.
Inventoryanalysisentailsthequantificationofenergy,water,andmaterialresourcerequirements,andemissionstoair,land,andwaterforallunitprocesseswithinthelifecycle.
Impactassessmentevaluatesthehumanandecologicaleffectsoftheresourceconsumptionandemissionstotheenvironmentassociatedwiththelifecycle.
-
6
Interpretationofresultsincludesanevaluationoftheimpactassessmentresultswithinthecontextofthelimitations,uncertainty,andassumptionsintheinventorydataandscope.
Acriticalreviewbyapanelofexpertsisalsorequiredforstudieswheretheresultsareintendedtosupportcomparativeassertionsthatwillbedisclosedtothepublic.ThisstudyhasbeenconductedinaccordancewiththerequirementsoftheISOstandards14040and14044,includingthecriticalreview.Thecontentinthisreportisgroupedintothesamefourareasoutlinedinthestandards,followedbyconclusions,asummaryofthecriticalreview,andappendices.
2 Goalandscope2.1 GoalsTheoverallgoalofthisstudyistocomparethelifecycleenvironmentalimpactofseveralhanddryingsystemsusingaconsistentbasis.Specificgoalsareto:
1) Evaluatehowhanddryingsystemsimpacttheenvironmentunderdifferentmanufacturingandusescenarios.
2) Identifyimpactdriversandwaystotargetthosefactors.3) Informproductdesigndecisions.
ThisstudywascommissionedbyDysonanditisexpectedthattheresultswillbeusedtosupportcomparativeassertionsthataredisclosedtothepublic.Thereporthastwoaudiences.Thefirstaudienceisanyinterestedpartywhowishestounderstandthedata,assumptions,andmethodologiesusedtocalculatelifecycleenvironmentalimpactforthehanddryingsystems.ThesecondaudienceistheDysonengineerswhoareinterestedinunderstandingthedriversofenvironmentalimpactforthehanddryingsystems.2.2 ScopeThesevensystemsfordryinghandsevaluatedinthisreportinclude:
1) ADysonAirbladehanddryerwithanaluminumcover(ahighspeedhandsindryer)2) ADysonAirbladehanddryerwithaplasticcover(ahighspeedhandsindryer)3) AnExcelXLERATORhanddryer(ahighspeedhandsunderdryer)4) Agenericstandardwarmairhanddryer(ahandsunderdryer)5) Genericcottonrolltowels6) Genericpapertowelsmanufacturedfromvirgincontent7) Genericpapertowelsmanufacturedfrom100%recycledcontent
-
7
Inadditiontothedryersandtowels,packagingisconsideredinallcases,aswellasdispensersinthecaseofthetowelsystemsandawastebinandbinlinersforthepapertowelsystems(Table1).
Figure1Dryingsystemsincludedinthisstudy(lefttoright):DysonAirbladehanddryerwithaplastic
cover,ExcelXLERATORhanddryer,genericstandardwarmairhanddryer,genericcottonrolltowelsanddispenser,andpapertowelsanddispenser.Note:picturesarenotshownwithaconsistentrelativescale.
Table1Additionalproductlifecyclesincludedinhanddryerortowelsystems.
Dryingsystem Packaging Dispenser Wastebin BinlinersAirbladedryer,aluminum Airbladedryer,plastic XLERATORdryer Standarddryer Cottonrolltowels Papertowels,virgin Papertowels,100%recycled
2.2.1 FunctionalunitAsinglepairofdryhandsrepresentsthefunctionalunit.Thecorrespondingreferenceflowsthereforeincludetheallocatedfractionofahanddryerorthenumberofcottonorpapertowelsassociatedwithdryingthatpairofhands(Table2).Forthehanddryers,dryisdefinedbytheNSFProtocolP335[19],whichsetsforthastandardfordryeroperationandhygiene,therebyprovidingaconsistentbasisfordeterminingusetimes.Althoughhygieneispartoftheprotocolandisanotherpurposeofthesystemsthatisofinteresttothescientificcommunity(e.g.[2024]),itisnotconsideredinthisanalysis.Sincehanddryersclearlydrymorethanonepairofhandsovertheirlifetime,theirimpacthastobeallocatedacrossallthesepairsofhands.Thesameholdstrueforthecottonrolltowels,toweldispensers,wastebin,binliners,andpackagingusedbytheseproducts.Allocationisaccomplishedbyassumingdryershavea5yearlifespan(giventhe5yearwarrantiesonthehighspeeddryers[25,26]),overwhichtheydry350,000pairsofhands[27]equaltoapproximately1,350pairsofhandsaweek.Therefore,1/350,000or2.86106oftheimpactofadryerisallocatedtothefunctionalunit.Thesame
-
8
assumptionsareusedforthetoweldispensers,wastebin,andpackaging.Theeffectofdryerlifetimeusageonenvironmentalimpactisinvestigatedinthesensitivityanalysis.Binlinersandcottonrolltowelsarealsousedformultiplepairsofdryhandsbutdonotlastthefull350,000uses.Thereforetheyrequiretheirownallocationstrategies.Iffivebinlinersareconsumedeachweekoneforeachworkday[6]eachlinerwillcorrespondto,onaverage,270pairsofdryhands.Consequently,1/270or0.0037binlinersareallocatedtothefunctionalunit.Althoughwastebinsandbinlinerscanalsobeusedforthedisposalofotherobjects,theirimpactsarefullyallocatedtopapertowels,whichrepresentsaworstcasescenarioforthepapertowels.Additionally,thepresenceofpapertowelswillincreasetheneedtochangetheliners.Likewise,thefactthatcottontowelscanbelaunderedandreusedanaverageof103times[12]beforetheyaredisposedhastobetakenintoaccountwhencalculatingthefractionofatowelrequiredtofulfillthefunctionalunit.Noallocationisnecessaryforpapertowels.
Table2Correspondingdryingsystemreferenceflowgivenafunctionalunitofdryingonepairofhands.
Dryingsystem ReferenceflowHanddryers 2.8610
6dryerandpackagingElectricitytodryonepairofhands
Cottonrolltowels9.71103cottontowelandpackaginga2.86106cottontoweldispenserLaundrytowashatowel
Papertowels2towelsandpackagingb2.86106papertoweldispenser2.86106wastebin3.7102binliner
(a)Assumingonecottonrolltowelpullperdry(b)Assumingtwopapertowelsperdry.
2.2.2 SystemboundaryTheanalysisincludesalllifecyclestages,fromcradletograve,alongwithtransportationbetweeneachstage.ThesestagesandtheircorrespondinglocationsareshowninFigure2forthehanddryer,cottonrolltowel,andpapertowelsystems.TheUnitedStatesistheprimaryregionoffocusfortheuseoftheproductsinthisstudy,althoughscenariosinvolvingseveralotherregionsthroughouttheworldhavebeenevaluatedinthesensitivityanalyses.Inordertoputthehanddryingsystemsonequalfootingfromasupplychainstandpointandtomaketheanalysisstrictlyacomparisonbetweentheperformanceoftheproductsystemsratherthanbetweenspecificsupplychainscenarios,allsystems,withtheexceptionofpapertowels,areassumedtobemanufacturedinChinaandusedintheUnitedStates.Chinaisacommonlocationforthemanufacturingoftechnologyproducts;itisalsoareasonableassumptionforthemanufactureofcottonrolltowels(see[12]).Papertowels,ontheotherhand,areassumedtobebothmanufacturedandusedintheUnitedStatesbecausethisrepresentstheindustrystandardforaproductthatisusedinalocationwheretherawmaterialsareplentifulatacompetitivepriceandtheproductionisnotlaborintensive.
-
9
Figure2Handdryer,cottonrolltowel,andpapertowellifecyclestagesandcorrespondinglocations
assumptionsforthebaselinescenario.
Material1
Material2
MaterialN
Papertowellifecyclestages
Baselinelocation
Materials Manufacturing Use Endoflife
Distributioncenter
Manufacturingfacility Washrooms Wastefacility
Transport(road)
Transport(road)
Transport(road)
KansasCity,KS,UnitedStates
KansasCity,KS,UnitedStates
Variouslocations,UnitedStates
100kmfromwashrooms
250kmfrommanufacturingfacility
Material1
Material2
MaterialN
Cottonrolltowellifecyclestages
Baselinelocation
Materials Manufacturing Use Endoflife
Distributioncenter
Manufacturingfacility Washrooms WastefacilityLaundry
Transport(road)
Transport(road)
Transport(road)
Transport(road)
Transport(ship,rail)
KansasCity,KS,UnitedStatesShanghai,China
Variouslocations,UnitedStates
100kmfromwashrooms
100kmfromwashrooms
250kmfrommanufacturingfacility
Material1
Material2
MaterialN
Dryerlifecyclestages
Baselinelocation
Materials Manufacturing Use Endoflife
Distributioncenter
Manufacturingfacility Washrooms Wastefacility
Transport(road)
Transport(road)
Transport(road)
Transport(ship,rail)
KansasCity,KS,UnitedStatesShanghai,China
Variouslocations,UnitedStates
100kmfromwashrooms
250kmfrommanufacturingfacility
-
10
2.2.2.1 LifecyclestagesUpstreamprocessessuchastheminingoforeortheextractionandrefiningofpetroleumforvehiclefuelareincludedwithinsystemboundaries.Oncetheoreisextractedandrefinedintorawmaterials(thematerialsstageinFigure2),thematerialsaretransportedtoamanufacturingfacilitywheretheyareprocessedandassembledintofinishedproducts(themanufacturingstage).Onlytheenergyrequiredtomanufacturedryersortowelsisaccountedforinthecalculationofmanufacturingstageimpact.Capitalequipment(e.g.buildings,machines,etc.)usedbyDysonoranyoftheotherhanddryerortowelmanufacturingfirmsisnotincludedinthemanufacturingphaseoftheanalysisbecausethepublishedreportsondryerandtowelproductionthatservedassourcesofinventorydataforthisreportlikewisedonotincludecapitalequipmentintheprimaryproductionphase.Thisassumptionisreasonablegiventheexpectedsmallcontributionofauxiliaryelectricityandcapitalequipmenttotheoveralllifecycleburdenofthehanddryingsystems.Dataforcapitalequipmentupstreamofdryingsystemproduction,however,isincludedthroughuseoftheecoinventdatabaseforunitprocessinventorydata.Afterproduction,thedryersandcottonrolltowelsaretransportedfromChinatoadistributioncenterintheUS.Thepapertowelfacility,bycontrast,islocatedintheUSandisthereforeassumedtobecolocatedwithadistributioncenter,whicheliminatestheneedforacorrespondingtransportationstep.Althoughtransportationtoandfromthedistributioncenterisaccountedfor,theimpactduetothecenteritselfisnotincludedinthesystembecausetheburdensassociatedwithoperatingwarehousesaresmallincomparisonwiththeburdenofmanufacturing.ThisisbasedonroughcalculationsusingdatafromacasestudybyCarnegieMellonUniversity[28]thatindicatethatwarehousingwouldbeapproximately0.05%ofthetotalGWPfordryers,0.5%forcottonrolltowels,and3%forpapertowels(seeAppendixA.7.1).Theproductsarenexttransportedfromthedistributioncentertoawashroom,wheretheusestagetakesplace.Fordryers,theusestageimpactissolelyduetotheelectricityrequiredforoperation.Whilethestandarddryer,whichheatstheair,canpotentiallyaffectwashroomHVACperformance,thiseffectisnotconsideredintheanalysisduetothedifficultyofquantifyingsuchaneffect.Maintenanceofthedryersisalsoassumedtobebeyondthescopeofthisanalysisbecausemaintenanceistypicallyalabordrivenactivity,whichisnotincludedinthescopeofenvironmentalimpactassessment.Theusestageforthecottonrolltowelsencompassesnotonlytheuseofthetowelinsideawashroom,butalsoacleaningstepwhichtakesplaceatalaundryfacility.Consequently,cottonrolltowelshaveanadditionaltransportationsteptodeliverthemtoandfromthelaundry.Finally,attheendoflife,allproducttypesaretransportedtoanearbywastefacilitywheretheyareincineratedorsenttoalandfill.Withtheexceptionofthecardboardpackaging,thereisnoclearevidencethattheseproductsarecommonlyrecycledorinthecaseofcottonandpapertowels,compostedintheUS.2.2.2.2 AllocationofrecycledcontentSystemboundariesalsohavetobedefinedwhenaproductlifecycleispartofanopenlooprecyclingsystem,asisthecaseforthepapertowelsmanufacturedfromrecycledcontent.Insuchcases,
-
11
allocationdecisionsfortherawmaterialproduction,recycling,andendoflifeburdensarenecessarybecausethepapertowelsystemcannotbeexpandedtoencompassallproductlifecyclesduetolackofknowledgeabouttheadditionalproducts.VariousallocationstrategiesaredescribedinAppendixA.4.Thecutoffmethod,whichassignstheburdenofrecyclingtotheproductlifecyclesthatuserecycledcontent(Figure36),ischosenforthebaseline.Sincepapertowelscanuserecycledcontentbutarerarelyrecycledthemselves(sameassumptionasintheKimberlyClarkstudy[13]),theyrepresentthefinalproductofanopenlooprecyclingsystemandareallocatedtheburdensfromrecyclingwastepaperandendoflifeinaccordancewiththeselectedstrategy.2.2.3 CutoffcriteriaInadditiontohanddryingsystemboundaries,thecutoffcriteria,orthepointatwhichinputoroutputflowsareexcludedfromtheanalysis,havetobedefinedforeachsystem.Thesecriteriacanbebasedonthemass,energy,orenvironmentalsignificanceoftheflows.InthecaseoftheDysonAirbladehanddryer,allpartsareaccountedfor,withthesmallerpartssuchasscrewsorfastenersaggregatedintoasinglepart[27].ThedataonwhichthisanalysisisbasedalsoincludedabreakdownoftheresistorsandothercomponentsontheDysonAirbladehanddryersprintedcircuitboard;thislevelofdetail,however,wasdeemedunnecessaryandthedatareaggregatedtocircuitboardlevel.TheXLERATORdryer,standarddryer,andpapertowellifecycleinventorieswereallbasedonthestudyforExcelDryer[14].Thisstudyincludedasmanycomponentsaspossiblegivenavailableinformation,andpredictedthatomittedpartswouldaccountforless1%oftotalimpact.Lastly,thecottonrolltowelswerebasedontheETSAstudy[12],whichexcludedprocessesthatconsistedoflessthan1%oftotalmassandenergybalance.Thenumberofprocessesexcluded,however,waslimitedsothattheyaccountedfornomorethan5%ofthetotalbalance.
3 LifecycleinventoryanalysisThissectiondetailsthedataandassumptionsusedtoconductalifecycleinventoryanalysisforeachhanddryingsystem.Thecompleteinventoryisgeneratedbycombiningbillofactivities1dataforeachsystemwithlifecycleinventorydataofrequiredunitprocessesfromexistingdatabases(Figure3).Wheneverpossible,datausedinthisstudywereobtainedfromexistingsources.Billofactivitiesdatasourcesandassumptionsforallhanddryingsystemsaredetailedbylifecyclestage.SomeoftheassumptionsarelaterevaluatedinthesensitivityanduncertaintyanalysestoassesstheireffectontheLCAresultsanddryingsystemcomparison.Thebillofactivitiesdatainformationisfollowedbyadescriptionofthelifecycleinventorydatausedbytheunitprocesses.Table3summarizestheassumptionsmadeforthebaselinescenario;detaileddataforeachhanddryingsystemcanbefoundinAppendixA.1.MuchofthedataforproductcompositionsandmanufacturingprocessesarederivedfromotherLCAstudiesonthesystems;whennecessary,assumptionsaremadeinordertoinsurethattheanalysesareconductedonaconsistentbasis(e.g.,productionoruselocation).1Billofactivitiesisdefinedtoincludematerialcomposition,productionrequirements,userequirements,andtransportationdistancesforaproductsystem.
-
12
Inparticular,allproducts,withtheexceptionofpapertowels,areassumedtobemanufacturedinChina(seeFigure2),eventhoughthisisnotnecessarilythecaseforthedryersinreality(e.g.,theXLERATORdryerisproducedintheUS[14]andtheDysonAirbladehanddryerisproducedinMalaysia[27]).Theuseofaconsistentbasisformanufacturinglocationandtransportationdistancesismotivatedbyanobjectiveofthestudytocomparetheinfluenceofdifferentmanufacturingandusescenariosofthedifferenthanddryingsystems.Thisisonlymeaningfulifthesupplychainscenariosarethesameandplausibleforsimilarproducts.Chinaisahighlyplausiblelocationfortheproductionofhanddryersbecauseitisacommonlocationforthemanufacturingoftechnologicalproducts.Usingaconsistentbasisenablesacomparisonamongproductsthatisfocusedonproductattributesincludingmaterialcomposition,manufacturingprocess,andenergyconsumption,andnotonsupplychainconfiguration(whichisnotknownforallproducts).However,asensitivityanalysisonmanufacturinglocationisincludedtoexploretheimpactofthisassumption.Papertowelsaretheexceptiontothispractice:thisstudyassumesthatthepapertowelsareproducedandusedintheUSbecausethisistheindustrystandardforaproductthatisusedinalocationwheretherawmaterialsareplentifulatacompetitivepriceandtheproductionisnotlaborintensive.
Figure3Stepstoconvertbillofactivitiesdatatoenvironmentalimpact.
3.1 BillofactivitiesThebillsofactivitiesforeachproductsystemaredetailedinAppendixA.1.Theyarecombinedwithunitprocessinventorydatatoconstructdryingsystemlifecycleinventories.MostofthesedatawereobtainedfromcriticallyreviewedLCAsdatingfrom2006andlater.Withtheexceptionofthecottonrolltowelbillofactivities,dataareatmost10yearsold.DysonsupplieddataforitsDysonAirbladehanddryers[27].DatafortheXLERATORandstandarddryersweretakenfromtheExcelstudy[14],whichobtaineditsdatadirectlyfromExcelDryer,IncandinthecaseofthestandarddryerfromtheAirdristreamlinedLCA[6].CottonrolltoweldatawereobtainedfromtheETSAreport[12];thisstudyusedexistingliteraturefromthe1990sand2000sforcottonrolltowelproduction,butconducteditsownsurveyoflaundriestodevelopalaunderingprocessinventory.Finally,papertoweldatawerebasedonacombinationoftheExcel[14],KimberlyClark[13],andETSA[12]studies.TheExcelstudyalsoreliedontheKimberlyClarkreportforpapertoweldata,whereastheETSAstudyreliedona2001reportonthebestavailabletechniquesreportinthepulpandpaperindustry[29].
Billofactivitiesdata
Lifecycleinventoryanalysis Lifecycle
inventoryUnitprocessinventorydata
Environmentalimpact
Impactassessmentmethodology
Lifecycleimpactassessment
-
13
Table3Assumptionsusedtogeneratehanddryingsystemlifecycleinventoriesforthebaselineanalysis.
DryingsystemAirblade(highspeed
handsindryer)XLERATOR(highspeed
handsunderdryer)Standard
warmairdryer Cottonrolltowels Papertowels
Functionalunit 1pairofdryhandsLifetimeusage 350,000pairsofdryhandsover5years[26,27]Mass(+manufacturingscrap)perdryerortowel
Al:14.8kg(1.43kg)Pl:9.9kg(2.16kg)[27]
9.4kg(1.12kg)[14] 6.4kg(0.9kg)[14] 16.2g(2.2g)[12] 1.98g(0.08g)[14]
Manufacturinglocation China China China China USManufacturingenergyperdryerortowel
146MJelectricity[27]
156MJelectricity[14]
156MJelectricity[14]
431kJelectricity507kJgas[12]
14.7kJelectricity24.4kJgas[14]
Uselocation US
Useintensity12sec@1,400W+0sec@0W+439sec@1W
20sec@1,500W+1.5sec@750W+429sec@1W
31sec@2,300W+1.5sec@1,[email protected]
1towel(pull)+laundry 2towels
Endoflifescenario76.7%ofcardboardrecycled19%ofremainingwasteincineratedwithenergyrecovery81%ofremainingwastelandfilledwithmethanecaptureandconversiontoelectricity[30,31]
TransportationRawmaterialtoplantPlanttowarehouseWarehousetowashroomWashroomtolaundryandbackWashroomtowastefacility
250kmviatruck10,500kmviaoceanfreighter+2,600kmviafreighttrain+24kmviatruck(excl.papertowels)1,760kmviatruck100kmviatruck(cottontowelsonly)100kmviatruck
Additionallifecycles Packaging Packaging Packaging Packaging,dispenser Packaging,dispenser,wastebin,binlinersPackagingperdryerortowel 2.94kgcardboard[27]
0.27kgcardboard[14]
0.45kgcardboard[14] 0.08gpolyethylene 0.18gcardboard[14]
-
14
3.1.1 Production:materialsandmanufacturingThisanalysisaccountsfortheimpactofmaterialproduction,includingupstreamimpactstartingfromoreextraction.Dryermaterialsareconservativelyassumedtobemanufacturedfromvirgincontent.Theyarethentransported250kmfromtheirrespectiveproductionorstoragefacilitytothemanufacturingplantwheredryerortowelmanufacturingtakesplace.Twohundredfiftykilometerswaschosenasanintermediatedistancebetweenthe750kmbyroadassumedinAirdriandExcelstudies[6,14],andthe30kmusedinthereportforCarbonTrust[27].Withtheexceptionofthepapertowelsystems,allmaterialsproductionandmanufacturingtakesplaceinChina(seediscussionatthebeginningofSection3abouttheuseofaconsistentbasis);consequently,theChineseaveragegridmix,alongwithChineseemissionfactorswhenavailable,isassumedfortheproductionofelectricity.Papertowels,bycontrast,areassumedtobemanufacturedintheUSandthusrelyontheUSgrid(seediscussioninSection3).Oncetheproductsarefinished,theyarethenshippedtoadistributioncenterintheUSandfromtheretoawashroom.AlltransportationstepsinthisanalysisareconsolidatedintoaseparatelifecyclestageandsummarizedinSection3.1.4.MaterialsandmanufacturingdataforthealuminumandtheplasticDysonAirbladehanddryerswereprovidedbyDysonandarebasedonthefirmsanalysisforitsCarbonReductionLabelthroughtheCarbonTrust[27].Melamineisassumedforthebulkmoldingcompound.Materialsdataforthedryersaccountfora9.7%anda22%scraprateforthealuminumandplasticdryers,respectively,whichrepresentstheworstcasescenarioformaterialloss.Capitalequipmentusedindryermanufactureisnotincluded(inaccordancewiththesystemboundaries,detailedinSection2.2.2.1).CorrespondingdatafortheXLERATOR,thehighspeedhandsunderdryer,werebasedonthestudypreparedforExcelDryer[14].TheExcelstudyusesagenericbillofactivitiesthatdoesnotrepresentanyoneXLERATORinExcelDryersproductline.Specifically,thereportassumesthattheXLERATORscoverisacombinationofthedryersthreeavailablecovers:stainlesssteel,plastic,andchromefinish.Thisassumptioniscarriedoverintothisstudybecausenoalternativedatawereavailablefortheindividualcovers.Thesamestudyisusedtoobtainproductiondataforastandardwarmairdryer(whichis,inturn,basedontheAirdriB709modelfromtheEnvironmentalResourcesManagementstudyconductedforAirdriLtd.andBobrickWashroomEquipment[6]).Forbothdryers,polypropyleneisassumedforunknownplastictypes,suchasthePlasticmixturelistedintheproductsbillsofmaterialsforthehousingretainerandmotorplastics.Thedryersalsocontainunspecifiedmass.Thismassisaccountedforwhencalculatingtransportationstageimpact,butisassumedtohavenoinfluenceonproductionstageimpact.Finally,a15%scrapratearoundtheaveragerateofthetwoDysonAirbladehanddryersisaddedtothematerialinputflowsofbothdryersinordertoensureanaccuratecomparison.ScrapvaluesinTable3,however,areslightlylessthan15%becausethescrapratewasnotappliedtoelectroniccomponentsorunspecifiedmass.ProductiondataforthecottonrolltowelswereobtainedfromtheOkInstitutreportfortheEuropeanTextileServicesAssociation[12].Theproductionofthesetowelsincludesproductionofcottonfibers,spinningandsizingoftheyarn,andweaving,desizing,andbleachingofthefabric.A10%weightlossisassumedinthespinningprocess[12],plusa2%lossinweaving[32].Thus,ittakes18.4gramsofcottonfiberstoproducethe16.2gramsofcottontowelthatrepresentonepulloftheroll[12].Thedispenser
-
15
usedforthecottontowelsisbasedonthepapertoweldispenserintheExcelstudy,althoughnobatteriesorcircuitryassociatedwithautomaticpapertoweldispensersareincludedsincethetowelsarepresumablypulledbyhandfromtheroll.Papertowelsmanufacturedfrom100%virginandfrom100%recycledcontentareexaminedinthisanalysis.Theformerisassumedtousepulpmanufacturedviathesulfateorkraftpulpingprocess,thedominantpulpingprocessthataccountsfor80%oftheworldspulpproduction[33],andbleachedusingelementalchlorinefree(ECF)technology,themostcommonbleachingprocessforsulfatepulpintheUSasof2002[34].Thispulpisthentransported250km(adistanceconsistentwithrawmaterialtransportationdistancesforthehanddryers)fromitsrespectivefacilitytoanonintegratedmanufacturingplantwherethepapertowelsareproduced.VirginpapertowelmanufacturingdatawerebasedontheExcelDryer[14],KimberlyClark[13],andETSA[12]studies.Papertowelsmanufacturedfromrecycledcontentwerealsoassumedtobeproducedinanonintegratedplant.Insuchcases,marketdeinkedpulpwouldbetransportedtothisplantfromitsrespectivemanufacturingfacilityandusedasarawmaterialinpapertowelproduction.Billofactivitiesandinventorydatafordeinkedpulpmanufacturedfrom100%recycledcontent,however,wereunavailableevenamongthecriticallyreviewedLCAstudies.TheKimberlyClark[13]reportprovidesanincompleteinventory,whilethestudybyExcel[14]doesnotevenaccountfortheenvironmentalimpactfrompulpmanufacturing(thisisacknowledgedinthereport).AlthoughtheETSA[12]studyprovidesaninventoryfortissuemanufacturing,thisinventoryisforanintegratedplant(wherepulpandtissuearemanufacturedinacontinuousprocess)andassumesonly50%recycledcontentGiventhelackofavailabledata,thisstudymadesimplifyingassumptionsforthedeinkedpulpmanufacturingprocess.Specifically,theimpactassociatedwithmanufacturingdeinkedpulpwasassumedequaltothatassociatedwithmanufacturingECFbleachedsulfatepulp.Woodinthesulfatepulpprocess,however,wasreplacedwith1.5kgofwastepaper[12].Thissubstitutionaddresseskeydifferencesinrawmaterialacquisition,butitmayleavesomeprocessesinthepulpingstepthatarerequiredonlyforvirginmaterialproduction(suchaswoodchipping).Whiletheseassumptionsintroduceuncertaintytotheresults(moresothantheresultsofpapertowelsmanufacturedfromvirgincontent),theuncertaintycannotbequantifiedduetolackofactualinventorydataforpapertowels.Amoredetailedstudyonrecycledpapertowelsisrecommended;sincenosuchstudycurrentlyexists,papertowelresultsfromthisstudywerecomparedwithresultsfromtheotherLCAsinAppendixA.6.3toensurethisstudysassumptionswerereasonableInbothcases,pulpandtissueweremanufacturedinthesamecountrywheretheusestagetakesplace(seediscussioninSection3).Additionally,thisassumptionisconsistentwiththeKimberlyClarkstudy.Papertowelshaveafinalproductmassof1.98g;a3.85%manufacturinglossisaccountedforinrawmaterialrequirements[13,14].Themanufacturingplantisalsoassumedtobeiscolocatedwithadistributioncenter,thuseliminatingtheneedfortransportationbetweenmanufacturingplantandwarehouse.Thisisareasonableassumptionbecausetheimpactofanytransportbetweentheplantandthedistributioncenterwouldbeminisculeincomparisonwiththeimpactoftransportingthehanddryersandcottonrolltowelsover13,000kmfromChinatotheirrespectivedistributioncenters.
-
16
Theresultsforthepapertowelscontainingrecycledcontentarepresentedusingthecutoffallocationapproach,whichisdetailedinAppendixA.4.Thisallocationschemewasselectedforthebaselineanalysisbecauseitonlyaccountsfortheburdensdirectlyassociatedwiththeproductionanddisposaloftherecycledcontenttowels.Papertowelsarenotrecycled(sameassumptionastheKimberlyClarkstudy[13])andthereforerepresentthefinalproductlifecycleinanopenlooprecyclingsystem.Thus,followingthecutoffallocationscheme,papertowelsmanufacturedfrom100%recycledcontentareassignedthefullburdenfromrecyclingwastepaperbackintopulp,andthefullburdenfromendoflife.Inadditiontothetowellifecycle,lifecyclesforadispenser,wastebin,andbinlinersareincludedintheassessmentofpapertowelhanddryingsystems.Thedispenseristhesameasthatusedforthecottontowels;thewastebinisassumedtobeentirelycomposedofsteel,andthebinlinersfrompolyethylene.3.1.2 UseIdeally,billofactivitiesdatafortheusephasewouldincludedetailsofwashroomvisitorusagepatternsforeachhanddryingsystemhowlongtheyspentoperatingeachdryerorhowmanytowelstheyusedafterwashinghands.Suchdatawouldalsocoverthesignificantvariationinthewaypeopledrytheirhandsduetodifferencesinhandsizes,inpreferencesaboutacceptabledryness,andinwillingnesstospendtimedryinghands.However,therealityisthattherearenoexistingdatasourcescapturingthiswidevariation,noristhereacommonmethodfordetermininghanddrynessacrossallthedifferentdryingsystems.Whilethisstudyhasnotattemptedtoaddressthisgap,theauthorshavenonethelessmadeeveryefforttocharacterizedryingsystemuseintensityusingthebestavailabledataandaconsistentbasisforcomparison.Useintensityrepresentstheamountofresourceseachhanddryingsystemrequirestodryapairofhands.Forhanddryers,thisisrelatedtothetimeusersspendoperatingthedryers.Handdryerdrytimeshavebeenincorporatedintothestudyintwoways:(1)measuredaccordingtoastandardthatdefineswhenhandsaredryand(2)reportedbydryermanufacturers(Table4).Toensureaconsistent,scientificbasiswhencomparinghanddryers,thisstudyadoptsmeasureddrytimesasitsprimarybaseline.ThesetimesweremeasuredaccordingtotheNSFProtocolP335[19](seeAppendixA.5),whichdefineshygienicallydryhandshashavinglessthan0.1gramsofmoistureremainingafterdrying.NSFprotocolmeasurementswereperformedbyDyson.ManufacturerreporteddrytimesareusedasasecondarybaselineforsomeanalysesinSection4.1.Thesereporteddrytimeswereobtainedfromdryerspecificationstakenfrommanufacturerswebsites.NeitherExcelDryernorthestandarddryermanufacturers,however,providedocumentationonhowtheyarrivedattheirdryersrespectivedrytimesorwhattheirbasiswasfordryness.Variationinuseintensityisalsoevaluatedinordertoassesstheconsequencesofdifferinguserpreferencesandthus,differingusagepatterns.Forinstance,usersmayprefertoholdtheirhandsintheairstreamuntiladesireddrynessisachievedreferredtoasdryingdrivenusageinthisreport.Thedrytimesfordryingdrivenusagearedefinedas50%belowto25%abovethemeasuredbaselinedrytimes(asdefinedbytheNSFProtocolP335).Alternatively,usersmayprefertowaitthesamelengthoftimefortheirhandstodry,regardlessofdryertype,beforeleavingreferredtoastimedrivenusage.
-
17
Dryingdrivenusageisassessedinasensitivityanalysis(seeSection5.1.4)andbothdryingandtimedrivenusagepatternsareassessedintheuncertaintyanalysis(seeSection0).
Table4Measuredandreporteddrytimesforhanddryers.
Dryer MeasuredNSFP335forUS ReportedAirblade 12sec[27] 12sec[35]XLERATOR 20sec[27] 12sec[14]Standarddryer 31sec[27] 30sec[6]
Oncedrytimeisdetermined,itisthenmultipliedbythedryersinuseratedpowertoarriveattheenergyconsumedduringoperation.Inuseenergyconsumption,though,isonlypartofadryerstotalenergyrequirementasdryersalsoconsumeenergyevenwhennotactivelydryinghands.Inadditiontodrytime,boththeXLERATORandthestandarddryersareassumedtohavea1.5secondspindowntimeathalfpower[14];theDysonAirbladehanddryer,bycontrast,usesadigitalmotoranddoesnotconsumepowerduringspindown[27].Alldryersarealsoassumedtohavesensorsthatrequireenergywheninstandbymode.TheXLERATORisassumedtohavethesame1WstandbypowerconsumptionastheDysonAirbladehanddryer[35],whereasthestandarddryerislowerat0.4W[36].Timespentonstandbyiscalculatedbysubtractingthetotaluseandspindowntimefor350,000pairsofhandsfromthetotaltimeinthe5yeardryerlifespan.Thistotalstandbytimeisthennormalizedbythe350,000usesandmultipliedbystandbypowerrating.Fromhere,spindownandstandbyenergyconsumptionsareaddedtoadryersinuseenergyconsumptiontoarriveatthetotalenergyallocatedtodryingapairofhands.TheUSaverageelectricgridmixisusedwhenassessingtheenvironmentalimpactofthisenergy.Table5summarizesdryerpowerconsumption,alongwithspindownandstandbytimes;additionaldetailsforcalculatingdryerenergyconsumptioncanbefoundinAppendixA.1.1.
Table5Dryerpowerconsumptionduringuse,spindown,andstandby.
Inuse Spindown Standby Power Time Power Power TimeAirblade 1,400W[35] 0sec 0W[27] 1W[35] 439secXLERATOR 1,500W[25] 1.5sec[14] 750W[14] 1W 429secStandarddryer 2,300W[27] 1.5sec[14] 1,150W 0.4W[36] 418secTheuseintensityofthecottonrolltoweldryingsystemisrepresentedbyonepullonacottontowelrollperfunctionalunit,equaltotheETSAstudysassumption[12].Whiletheinwashroomuseofcottonrolltowelsdoesnothaveanimpact,launderingthetowelsdoes.ThelaunderingprocessisalsobasedontheETSAstudy[12].Usedtowelsaretransported50kmfromthewashroomtothelaundry,wherethey
-
18
arewashedandthermallydisinfectedbeforebeingpackagedinplasticfilmandreturnedtothewashroom.Unlikethehanddryers,thereisnoequivalentprotocolfordeterminingthenumberofpapertowelsrequiredtoachieveaspecificlevelofdryness.Thus,thepapertowelbaselineassumesauseintensityoftwotowelsperfunctionalunitbasedonobservationaldatafromaUniversityofFloridastudy[37].AspartoftheUFstudy,researchersobservedthelengthoftimepublicwashroomuserswashedtheirhandsandthenumberofpapertowelstheytooktodrytheirhands.Papertowelusagevariedbetweenoneandseventowels,withanaverageof2.1towelsperuser.ItshouldbenotedthatthetwopapertoweluseintensityassumptionisconsistentwithseveralotherLCAstudies(seeTable40),anoteworthyexceptionbeingtheKimberlyClarkStudy,whichassumes1.5papertowels.However,noneofthestudiesprovidesanyrigorousjustificationforthenumberofpapertowelsused,includingKimberlyClark.Thus,thedatafromtheUFstudyisusedasthebasisforthenumberofpapertowelsinthisstudy.Anotherconsiderationisthattheexactnumberofpapertowelswilllikelydependontowelmass,whichvariesamongthedifferentstudiessurveyed.Bothuseintensityandtowelmassarelaterexploredinasensitivityanalysis(seeSections5.1.4and5.1.9).Sincepapertowels,packaging,dispensers,thewastebin,andbinlinersdonotrequireanyenergyduringuse,theythereforehavetoimpactinthisstage.3.1.3 EndoflifeOncethehanddryersortowelsarenolongerinuse,theproductsaretransported100kmtoawastefacility,consistentwith[27],anddisposedaccordingtoUSaveragewasteandrecyclingfractionsfrom2008[30].Thus,76.7%ofcardboardpackagingisrecoveredforrecycling;eachkilogramofcardboardisassumedtodisplace0.78kgofnewcardboard(estimatedbasedon[12]).Nineteenpercentoftheremainingcardboardandallotherwasteisincinerated,withtheremaining81%senttothelandfill.Bothenergyrecoveryfromincinerationandmethanecapturefromlandfillemissionsareconsideredinthebaselinescenario.Incinerationenergyrecoveryisassumedtoproduce0.65kWhofelectricityperkilogramofwasteincinerated[38].Sincethis0.65kWhrepresentstheavoidedproductionofelectricity,eachdryingsystemiscreditedwith0.632gCO2eqperkilogramofwasteincineratedtheemissionsassociatedwithproducing0.65kWhofelectricitygiventheUSaveragegridmix.Methanecapturedfromlandfillemissionsisalsoassumedtobeburnedwithenergyrecoverytoproduceelectricity.AdditionaldetailsandreferencesforthisprocesscanbefoundinAppendixA.2Asidefromtherecyclingofcardboardpackaging,nootherrecyclingisassumedtotakeplace.Whilehanddryerscanberecycled(andindeedarerequiredtoberecycledinEuropeperthewasteelectricalandelectronicequipmentdirective[39]),thereisnoclearevidencethatthisiscommonpracticeintheUS.PapertowelrecyclingisalsopossibleasnotedbyKimberlyClark[40],althoughtheirLCAstudy[13]assumesthatthepapertowelsarenotrecoveredafterdisposal.Likethehanddryers,thereisnostrongevidencethatrecyclingpapertowelsiscommonpracticeintheUS;composting,however,isgainingground(e.g.[41,42])andisthusaddressedinthesensitivityanalysis(seeSection5.1.5).Cottontowelsarenotrecycled,butcanpotentiallybereusedasindustrialcleaningcloths[12](althoughthisscenarioisnotconsideredinthisanalysis).
-
19
3.1.4 TransportationTransportationtakesplacebetweeneachofthelifecyclestages.Distancesareeithertakenfromliterature,orestimatedaccordingtoproduction,use,andendoflifelocations.Table6liststhedistanceandvehicletypeforeachtransportationstep.Vehicletypesarechosentomatchascloselyaspossibletothoseusedin[12,27].Somestepsarenotincludedinthepapertowellifecyclebecausethetowelsareassumedtobemanufacturedinthesamecountrywheretheyareusedandhaveamanufacturingfacilitycolocatedwiththeirwarehouse.Cottonrolltowelshavetheadditionalstepofbeingtransportedtoandfromthelaundry.
Table6Transportationvehiclesanddistancesforallproducts(unlessnotedotherwise).
What Towhere Distance Vehicle NotesRawmaterials Manufacturingplant 250km >16ttruck
Finishedproduct LongBeachport 10,500km[43] Oceanfreighter ExcludingpapertowelsFinishedproduct Warehouse 2,600km24kma
Freighttrain>32ttruck
Excludingpapertowels
Finishedproduct Washroom 1,760kmb >32ttruck
Dirty/cleantowels Laundry&back 100km[12] 3.57.5ttruck CottontowelsonlyUsedproduct Wastefacility 100km[27] 7.516ttruck
(a)Estimatedusing[27,44](b)EstimatedbyaveragingdrivingdistancesfromKansasCity,KStoNewYork,NY;LosAngeles,CA;andChicago,ILusing[44].
3.1.5 Dataquality:sensitivityanalysisNumerousassumptionsaremadeinthedefinitionofbillsofactivities.Asensitivityanalysisisusedtoexploretheextenttowhichvariabilityinthebaselinescenarioassumptions(detailedinSections3.1.1through3.1.4)affectstheenvironmentalimpactsofthehanddryingsystems.TheresultsofthesensitivityanalysisarepresentedinSection5.1.Theanalysisevaluatesarangeofscenariosthatdeviatefromthebaseline.Thebaselineassumptionsaddressedinclude(withbaselinevaluesshowninparentheses):
Lifetimeusage(350,000)numberofpairsofhandsdriedoverthe5yearproductlifespan. Manufacturingphaseelectricgridmix(ChinaorUSaveragemix)technologyportfoliothat
supplieselectricpowerfordryerandtowelproduction. Usephaseelectricgridmix(USaveragemix)technologyportfoliothatsupplieselectricpower
fordryerandtoweluse.
-
20
Useintensity(variesbyproduct)lengthofdrytimefordryers,ornumberofpapertowelsorcottonrolltowelpullsrequiredtodryhands.
Endoflifescenario(19%incinerated,81%landfilledwithenergyrecovery)fractionofwasteincinerated,landfilled,recycled,orcomposted;energyrecoveryassumptionismaintainedthroughout.
Dryerelectronicsunitprocess(Electroniccomponent,active,unspecified)unitprocessinventorychosentorepresentthecontrolandopticsassembliesintheXLERATORandstandarddryers.
Cottonrolltowelreuses(103cycles)numberoftimescottonrolltowelscanbelaunderedandreusedbeforedisposal.
Papertowelmass(1.98g)massofvirginandrecycledcontentpapertowels. Pulpmanufacturingprocess(ECFbleachedsulfate)manufacturingprocessofpulpusedby
virginpapertowels. Endoflifeallocationmethodologyforrecycledcontentinpapertowels(cutoff)allocationof
theburdenofprimarymaterialproduction,recycling,andendoflifeprocesses. Manufacturinglocation(ChinaorUS)wheretheproductsaremanufactured;affects
productionelectricgridmixandtransportationdistances. Uselocation(US)wheretheproductsareused;affectstransportationdistances,electricgrid
mix,andendoflifescenario.3.2 UnitprocessinventorydataInadditiontothebillofactivitiesdata,unitprocessinventorydataarealsonecessarytogeneratealifecycleinventory.Aunitprocessisthesmallestelementconsideredinthelifecycleinventoryanalysisforwhichinputandoutputdataarequantified[11].Theinputsandoutputscanbeintermsofotherunitprocesses(e.g.,electricityorsteelproduction)orbasicsubstances(e.g.,mineralsorgaseousemissions).Theseunitinventoriesaretypicallyobtainedfromdatabasessuchasecoinvent[32]andUSLCI[45].Wheneverpossible,theunitprocessinventorydataforthelifecycleinventoriesaretakenfromtheecoinventDatabasev2.1[32].Themajorityofecoinventunitprocessesareusedwithoutmodification.Consequently,theyrepresentthedatabasesdefaultassumptionssuchastheinclusionofcapitalequipmentforrawmaterialsproduction,amixtureofcountryspecificemissionsfactorsforasinglecountryselectricityproductionowingtodataavailabilitylimitations,andtheuseofEuropeanfuelsandemissionsfactorsforroadtransportation.Inafewcases,though,ecoinventprocessdataismodifiedordataisadoptedfromexternalsourcesbecauseofalackofexistinginventorydata:
Galvanizedsteelcreatedusingecoinventdataforsteelandzinccoating
-
21
Sheetsteelsheetcreatedusingecoinventdataforsteelandrolling Plasticmixturewithextrusioncreatedusingecoinventdataforpolypropyleneandextrusion Glassfiberreinforcedpolypropylenecreatedusingecoinventdataforglassfibersand
polypropylene Polycarbonate/acrylonitrilebutadienestyrenemixtureofthetwopolymers,basedon[27] CottonrolltowelmanufacturingadoptedfromtheETSAstudy[12];theseprocessesinclude
spinningthecottonfibersintoyarn,sizingtheyarn,weavingthetowels,anddesizing,scouring,andbleaching
CottontowellaunderingadoptedfromtheETSAstudy,whichliststhedetergent,energy,andwaterrequiredtowashthetowels
Pulpfromwastepaperamodifiedecoinventsulfatepulpingprocess(ECFbleached)inwhichwoodisreplacedwith1.5kgwastepaper(basedon[12])
Cardboardrecyclingcreatedusingecoinventdatawithanestimatedrecyclingratefrom[12] Incinerationwithenergyrecoverybasedonecoinventdatawithanestimatedelectricity
generationratefrom[38] Landfillwithmethanecapturebasedonecoinventdatawithestimatedmethanecaptureand
electricitygenerationratesfrom[46] CompostingbasedondatafromaEuropeanCommissionstudyonbiodegradableMSW[47]
BillsofactivitiesforthesemodifiedunitprocessesareincludedinAppendixA.2.Also,agenericecoinventunitprocess,Electroniccomponent,active,unspecified,thesameunitprocessasintheExcelstudy[14],isusedfortheXLERATORandstandarddryerelectroniccomponentsbecausespecificinformationisnotavailableforthesecomponents.3.3 UncertaintyanalysesUncertaintyanalysesareusedtoassesstheconsequencesofvariabilityoruncertaintyintheinputsonenvironmentalimpactresultsofthehanddryingsystems.Twotypesofuncertaintyanalysesareconductedinthisstudy.Thefirstaddressesvariabilityinthebaselinescenarioassumptions.Distributionsareassignedtoparameterssuchaslifetimeusage,electricgridmix,anduseintensity.AMonteCarlosimulationisthenemployedtogeneratescenariosgiventheparameterdistributionsandcalculatetheresultingenvironmentalimpactdistribution.Thesecondanalysisinvestigatesuncertaintyandvariabilityinthebillofactivitiesdata.Incomparisontothefirstanalysis,whichaddressesscenariolevelvariables(e.g.useintensity),thisanalysisfocusesonthequantityofeachunitprocessrequiredbyahanddryingsystem.Thisquantityisrelatedto,butnotthesameas,thescenariolevelvariables:forinstance,thebillofactivitiesdataincludehanddryeruse
-
22
phaseelectricityconsumption,whichnotonlydependsonuseintensity,butalsoonthedryerspowerrating.Often,however,uncertaintydataisnotavailableorcannotbederivedfortheunitprocessquantitiesincludedinthebillofactivities.Apedigreematrixapproach[32]isthereforeemployedtotranslatequalitativeassessmentsofthedatasourcesintoquantifiableuncertaintycalculations.Aspartofthismethod,thebillofactivitiesdatasourcesarefirstevaluatedbasedonsixcharacteristics:reliability,completeness,temporalcorrelation,geographiccorrelation,furthertechnologicalcorrelation,andsamplesize.Oneoffivequalitylevelsthatdescribethedegreeofuncertaintyischosenforeachofthecharacteristicsbasedondescriptionsfoundin[32].Thesequalitylevelsare,inturn,eachassociatedwithanuncertaintyfactorthatquantifiestheiruncertainty(Table7).Lowerqualitylevelvaluesrepresenthigherconfidenceinthedataandthustranslatetosmalleruncertaintyfactors.Aseventhbasicuncertaintyfactorisalsoaddedaccordingtowhethertheprocessrepresentsaninputoroutputtothetechnosphereoremissions.Finally,uncertaintyfactorsareusedtocalculatethegeometricstandarddeviation(SDg)ofthebillofactivitiesdatausingthefollowingequation:
27262524232221 lnlnlnlnlnlnln UUUUUUUg eSD
Uxrepresenttheuncertaintyfactorsofthesixcharacteristicsplusthebasicuncertaintyfactor.ThepedigreematrixapproachisappliedtoeachelementinthebillofactivitiesandtheresultinggeometricstandarddeviationsenteredintoSimaPro,wheretheyareusedtoscalethedistributionmeans(representedbythebaselineunitprocessquantities).AMonteCarlosimulationisthenruntoassesstheconsequencesofdatasourcequalityonenvironmentalimpact.TheresultsarepresentedinSection5.2.2andqualitylevelsassignedtoeachprocessarelistedinAppendixA.3.
Table7Pedigreematrixuncertaintyfactors[32].
QualityLevel 1 2 3 4 5Reliability 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.20 1.50Completeness 1.00 1.02 1.05 1.10 1.20Temporalcorrelation 1.00 1.03 1.10 1.20 1.50Geographicalcorrelation 1.00 1.01 1.02 1.10Furthertechnologicalcorrelation 1.00 1.20 1.50 2.00Samplesize 1.00 1.02 1.05 1.10 1.20
4 Lifecycleimpactassessment4.1 LifecycleimpactassessmentmethodologiesTheenvironmentalimpactsassociatedwithalifecycleinventorycanbecalculatedusingalifecycleimpactassessment(LCIA)methodology.LCIAcalculationsinthisstudyhavebeenperformedusingthe
-
23
SimaPro7softwarepackagefortheglobalwarmingpotential(GWP),IMPACT2002+,andcumulativeenergydemand(CED)methodologies.Resultsarealsopresentedforwateruse(anelementaryflow)andlandoccupation(amidpointcategoryintheIMPACT2002+methodology).Novaluechoicesorweightingareusedintheapplicationoftheseimpactassessmentmethodologies.Eachmethodologyisdescribedbelowalongwithajustificationforitsuse.4.1.1 GlobalwarmingpotentialGlobalwarmingpotential(GWP)[48]incorporatestheimpactofgaseousemissionsaccordingtotheirpotentialtocontributetoglobalwarmingbasedonthevaluespublishedin2007bytheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC).Theimpactsforallgaseousemissionsareevaluatedrelativetocarbondioxideusingcharacterizationfactorsthattranslatethemassofeachgasintoanequivalentmassofcarbondioxide(e.g.1kgCH4emittedintotheatmosphereisequivalentto25kgCO2[49]).Thesefactorsareinternationallyacceptedasameansofcharacterizinggreenhousegasemissions.ResourceconsumptionandliquidandsolidemissionsarenotincludedintheGWPmethodologybecausetheydonotdirectlycontributetoglobalwarming.Biogeniccarbondioxideandcarbonmonoxideflowsarealsonotincludedintheaccounting(unlesstheanalysisinvolvescarbonsequestration);biogenicmethane,however,isincluded2.Inthisreport,characterizationfactorsarebasedona100yeartimeframebecausetheyarethemostcommonlyusedfactorsinLCAstudies.GWPwasselectedasanLCIAmetricbecauseofitshighprofileintheassessmentofproductenvironmentalperformancefornumerousproducttypesacrosstheworldandparticularlyforenergyintensiveproducts.Furthermore,themetricisusedinvirtuallyallofthestudiesusedasreferencesforthisstudy.ForthesereasonsGWPisusedastheprimarymeansforcomparisonofenvironmentalimpact.4.1.2 IMPACT2002+IMPACT2002+[50]isadamageorientedmethodthatevaluatesenvironmentalimpactinfourendpointcategories:humanhealth,ecosystemquality,climatechange,andresources.Thesecategoriesarecalculatedfrom15midpointcategories(showninFigure4)which,inturn,havebeenadaptedfromIMPACT2002,Ecoindicator99,CML(CenterofEnvironmentalScience),andIPCC.DamagetoHumanHealthisinunitsofdisabilityadjustedlifeyears(DALY),implyingthatdifferentdisabilitiescausedbydiseasesareweighted.EcosystemQualityisreportedinunitsofpotentiallydisappearedfractionofplantspecies(PDFm2yr).ClimateChangeissimilartoGWPfromabove,butusescharacterizationfactorsbasedona500yeartimeframe.Finally,ResourcesincludesassessmentofmineralsandfossilfuelsinunitsofMJ.EachdamagecategorycanthenbenormalizedbyaverageEuropeanimpactsandweightedinordertoaggregateallimpactsintoasinglevaluewhichhastheunitsofpoints,where1000pointsrepresentstheaverageenvironmentalimpactofaEuropeaninoneyear.Weightingisnotusedinthisstudy.
2AconsequenceofbiogeniccarbonnotbeingincludedintheIPCCstandardforthisstudyisthatitmayobscuretheimpactofseveralcriticalassumptionsregardingcarbonneutralityofpulpingliquorcombustionduringproductionofsulfatepulpforvirgincontentpapertowels.Italsoneglectstheforestryimpactsforpapertowels.However,thisstudyfollowstheIPCCmethod,whichdoesnotincludebiogeniccarbonasitrepresentsthescientificconsensusoncarbonaccounting.
-
24
Amultiindicatorimpactassessmentmethodwassoughtthatcouldcalculateotherimportantimpactsbeyondglobalwarmingsuchashumanhealthandecosystemquality.IMPACT2002+wasselectedbecauseitisaninternationallyacceptedmethodforLCIAthatincludescharacterizationmodelsfromseveralwellrespectedLCIAmethodologies.Furthermore,ithasbeenusedinanotherkeyhanddryingstudy(theExcelstudy[14]).ThisstudyincludesresultsfromIMPACT2002+midpointcategoriesintabularformat,butmostofthegraphicalresultsarepresentedforthehumanhealthandecosystemqualityendpointcategoriestofacilitateaclearandsimplecomparisonofenvironmentalimpactwithinthesecategories.Theothertwoendpointcategories,climatechangeandresources,arenotincludedinthisstudybecausetheyareverysimilar(althoughnotidentical)toGWPandcumulativeenergydemand(describedbelow),andthereforeareconsideredredundant.
Figure4The15midpointcategoriesandfourendpointcategoriesofIMPACT2002+.
AlimitationofapplyingtheIMPACT2002+methodologyisthatitisfocusedonaEuropeancontext,whereasthefocusofthisstudyistheUnitedStates.However,thisassumptionisacceptablegiventhatmultipleregionsoutsidetheUSwillbeevaluatedinsensitivityanalysesanditisnotconstructivetousedifferentLCIAmethodsforeachregion(particularlywhentheymaynotbeavailableforallregions).Furthermore,IMPACT2002+hasbeendeemedtobecurrentlymoreinternationallyacceptedthanUSspecificmethodssuchasTRACI.4.1.3 CumulativeenergydemandCumulativeenergydemand(CED)[48]includesalldirectandindirectenergyconsumptionassociatedwithadefinedsetofunitprocesses.Itdoesnotdirectlyaccountfortheimpactofrawmaterialconsumptionoremissionstotheenvironment.ValuesforCEDaremeasuredintermsofenergy(e.g.
Lifecycleinventoryresults
CarcinogensNoncarcinogens
RespiratoryinorganicsIonizingradiation
OzonelayerdepletionRespiratoryorganicsAquaticecotoxicity
TerrestrialecotoxicityTerrestrialacid/nutriLandoccupation
AquaticacidificationAquaticeutrophication
GlobalwarmingNonrenewableenergyMineralextraction
EcosystemQuality
Humanhealth
ClimateChange
Resources
MidpointCategories EndpointCategories
-
25
joules).ItisimportanttonotethatCEDisaproxymetricforenvironmentalimpactandthus,itisnotaformalimpactassessmentmethod,althoughitiscommonlyreferredtoassuchandwillbeinthisreport.LikeGWPandIMPACT2002+,CEDisawidelyacceptedmethodology.CEDwasselectedasanLCIAmethodologyforthisstudybecauseenergyconsumptionisoftentheprimarydriverofenvironmentalimpactforelectricityintensiveproductssuchashanddryers.Furthermore,thepublicisfamiliarwithenergyasaproxymetricofenvironmentalimpactbecauseoftheextensivemarketingaroundenergyconsumptionofconsumerproducts.Cumulativeenergydemandisanextensionofthistypeofthinkingtotheentireproductlifecycleandthus,isanaturalmetricforuseinthisstudy.4.1.4 WaterconsumptionandlandoccupationWaterconsumptioniscalculatedasanelementaryflowinthelifecycleinventoryandlandoccupationisamidpointcategoryintheIMPACT2002+methodology.Theyareincludedasimpactassessmentmetricsbecausetheyareparticularlyrelevanttoassessmentsofproductsmadefromnaturalresources(suchaspaper).Asidefrompresentationofresults,however,theyarenotfurtherassessed.Waterconsumption,inparticular,isnotaLCIAmethodology,butratherasummationofwateruse(includingturbineflows)thatiscalculateddirectlyfromdryingsystemlifecycleinventories.4.2 Baselineanalysis4.2.1 ResultsbyimpactassessmentmethodologyFigure5showstheresultingGWP,brokendownbylifecyclestage,associatedwithdryingonepairofhands.BothmeasuredandreporteddrytimesareincludedinFigure5aandb,respectively.Inbothcases,thetwoDysonAirbladehanddryersystemsareassociatedwiththelowestGWPsofallthehanddryingsystems,followedbytheXLERATORsystem.Thestandarddryersystem,ontheotherhand,isassociatedwiththehighest.Sinceeachdryerdriesupto350,000pairsofhandsoveritslifespan,theimpactfromtheproductionandendoflifestagesallocatedtoeachpairofdryhandsisverysmall;consequently,dryerimpactisdominatedbyuseanddryerswithsimilardrytimes(andpowerratings)willhavesimilarimpacts.Cottonrolltowelsystemimpactisalsodominatedbyuse,whichisdrivenbythewashingofthetowels.Bycontrast,materialsandmanufacturinghavethelargestimpactforpapertowels.Despitethedifferentmanufacturingprocesses,thereisminimaldifferencebetweenthevirginandtherecycledpapertowelsbecausetheythisstudyassumestheyusethesametissuemanufacturingprocess,andpulpproducedfromwastepaperhasnearlythesameGWPaspulpproducedwithvirginwood.ItisdifficulttoassessexactlyhowthisassumptionimpactstheresultsbecausetheKimberlyClarkstudycalculatesat30%increaseinGWPimpactforrecycledpapertowelsovervirginpapertowels[13],whereasthePaperTaskForce[58]notedina1995reportonprintingpaperthatdeinkedpulpproductionconsumeslessenergyandmorebleachingchemicalsthanbleachedkraftpulpproduction.AconsistencycheckisperformedinAppendix8A.6A.6,whichcomparestheGWPresultsinFigure5withresultsfromliterature.Thecheckindicatesthatthereisvariationinotherpublishedresultsofpapertowelimpacts,buttheoutcomesinthisstudyaresimilartothosecalculatedintheKimberlyClarkstudy.Improvedinventorydataonrecycledpapertowelswouldhelptoclarifythesediscrepanciesamongstudies.
-
26
IMPACT2002+results,calculatedusingmeasuredandreporteddrytimes,arepresentedinFigure6.Onlyhumanhealthandecosystemqualityareincludedbecausetheothertwoendpointcategories,climatechangeandresources,aremaderedundantbythisreportsuseofGWPandCED.Additionally,midpointcategoryoutputs,usedinthecalculationoftheendpoints,areincludedinTable8.Intheseresults,theimpactsoftheDysonAirbladehanddryersaregenerallylowerthanthoseoftheotherdryingsystems:onlythecottonrolltowelsareassociatedwithlowerimpactsinthecarcinogen,ionizingradiation,andmineralextractionmidpointcategories.Roughlyspeaking,DysonAirbladehanddryerimpactsarefollowedbytheXLERATORandcottonrolltowelimpacts,andthenbythestandarddryerandpapertowelimpacts;theexactorderofthesystemswillultimatelydependonthemidpointcategory.
-
27
Figure5Globalwarmingpotentialassociatedwithdryingasinglepairofhands.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
Glob
alwa
rmingp
oten
tial[g
CO2eq
] EndofLifeUse
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
(a)Measureddrytimes
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
Glob
alwa
rmingp
oten
tial[g
CO2eq
] EndofLifeUse
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
(b)Reporteddrytimes
-
28
Figure6Impactassociatedwithdryingasinglepairofhandsbasedonimpact2002+endpointshumanhealthandecosystemquality.(a)and(c)arecalculatedusingmeasureddrytimes(inaccordancewiththeNSFProtocol)and(b)and(d)arecalculatedusingmanufacturerreporteddrytimes.
20
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
H
u
m
a
n
h
e
a
l
t
h
[
1
0
9
D
A
L
Y
]
EndofLifeUse
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
(a)Measureddrytimes
20
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
H
u
m
a
n
h
e
a
l
t
h
[
1
0
9
D
A
L
Y
]
EndofLifeUse
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
(b)Reporteddrytimes
100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
E
c
o
s
y
s
t
e
m
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
[
P
D
F
.
c
m
2
.
y
r
]
EndofLifeUse
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
(c)Measureddrytimes
100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
E
c
o
s
y
s
t
e
m
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
[
P
D
F
.
c
m
2
.
y
r
]
EndofLifeUse
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
(d)Reporteddrytimes
-
29
Table8Impact2002+midpointcategoryresultsforeachdryingsystem(givenmeasureddrytimes).
IMPACT2002+midpointcategories Units
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic XLERATOR
Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,
100%recy.Endpt.Category
Carcinogens gC2H3Cleq 0.277 0.272 0.486 1.111 0.205 0.525 0.525 HHNoncarcinogens gC2H3Cleq 0.102 0.090 0.189 0.386 0.145 0.454 0.457 HHRespiratoryinorganics gPM2.5eq 3.63103 3.45103 6.33103 0.0135 8.16103 0.0126 0.0128 HHIonizingradiation BqC14eq 0.127 0.119 0.239 0.521 0.104 0.291 0.290 HHOzonelayerdepletion gCFC11eq 1.43107 1.24107 2.68107 5.38107 1.03106 1.18106 1.21106 HHRespiratoryorganics gC2H4eq 6.02104 5.81104 1.11103 2.27103 3.31103 4.38103 4.09103 HHAquaticecotoxicity gTEGwater 486 462 1135 2197 935 1619 1628 EQTerrestrialecotoxicity gTEGsoil 118 113 243 484 290 410 417 EQTerrestrialacid/nutri gSO2eq 0.0757 0.0725 0.136 0.293 0.221 0.291 0.298 EQLandoccupation cm2org.arable 0.102 0.094 0.227 0.478 22.1 45.0 21.1 EQAquaticacidification gSO2eq 0.0308 0.0297 0.0551 0.1210 0.0499 0.0812 0.0822 Aquaticeutrophication gPO4Plim 2.66104 2.45104 2.28103 2.80103 2.03103 4.05103 4.06103 Globalwarming gCO2eq 4.44 4.19 7.85 17.2 10.2 14.6 14.8 CCNonrenewableenergy kJprimary 72.1 69.2 130 285 171 245 247 REMineralextraction kJsurplus 0.162 0.137 0.170 0.216 0.062 0.280 0.277 REEndpointcategories:HHhumanhealth;EQecosystemquality;CCclimatechange;REresources.
-
30
Figure7Cumulativeenergydemandassociatedwithdryingasinglepairofhands,assuming(a)measured
drytimesand(b)reporteddrytimes.
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
Cumulativee
nergyd
eman
d[kJ
eq] EndofLife
Use
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
(a)Measureddrytimes
100
0
100
200
300
400
500
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
Cumulativee
nergyd
eman
d[kJ
eq] EndofLife
Use
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
(b)Reporteddrytimes
-
31
Figure8Waterconsumptionassociatedwithdryingasinglepairofhands(calculatedfromlifecycle
inventoriesbasedonmeasureddrytimes).
Figure9Landoccupation(IMPACT2002+midpoint)associatedwithdryingasinglepairofhands
(calculatedbasedonmeasureddrytimes).
100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
Water
consum
ption(
incl.tu
rbine)
[L]EndofLifeUse
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
Land
occupa
tion(
cm2 org.arable)
EndofLifeUse
Transportation
Manufacturing
Materials
-
32
CEDresults,alsocalculatedusingmeasuredandreporteddrytimes,arepresentedinFigure7.Again,thehighspeeddryersystemsareshowntohavethelowestimpacts,andthepapertowelandthestandarddryersystemsthehighest,withthecottonrolltowelsystemfallingsomewhereinbetween.InthecaseofCED,virginpapertowelshavethehigherimpactbecausethemethodologyaccountsfortheenergyembodiedinvirginwood.ResultsfromwaterconsumptionandlandoccupationareshowninFigures8and9,respectively,formeasureddrytimesonly.Waterconsumptioniscalculateddirectlyfromthelifecycleinventories,andlandoccupationisamidpointcategorywithinIMPACT2002+andcontributestotheecosystemqualityendpointcategory.4.2.2 EndpointcategorynormalizationSomeLCIAmethodologies,inparticularthoseconcerningmultipleissuessuchasIMPACT2002+,haveanadditionalnormalizationstepinwhichtheresultsofendpointcategoriesaredividedbyafactorbeforebeingweightedandcombinedintoasinglescore.InthecaseofIMPACT2002+,thedamageassessmentsarenormalizedbydividingtheimpactbythetotalimpactofallsubstanceswithinaspecificcategorythatapersonlivinginEuropeisexposedtooveroneyear[50].ThisnormalizationenablesacomparisonofthefourendpointcategoriessoonecanseewhichhavethegreatesteffectonanaverageEuropean.Figure10showstheresultsofthisnormalizationforthetwoendpointcategoriesinFigure6aswellasfortheotherendpointcategories,climatechangeandresources.Theresultsindicatethathumanhealth,climatechange,andresourceshaveapproximatelythesamerelativeimpactwhiletheimpactofecosystemqualityismuchless.
Figure10IMPACT2002+endpointcategoriesafternormalizationofresultsgivenmeasureddrytimes.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
Normalized
IMPA
CT20
02+
endp
oint
categorie
s[10
6pts]
HumanHealthEcosystemQualityClimateChangeResources
-
33
4.2.3 RankordercomparisonDryingsystembaselineresultsformeasureddrytimesarecomparedinTable9byrankorderingthesystems.(Rankorderformeasureddrytimesisslightlydifferentforthehumanhealthandwaterconsumptionimpactcategories.)Systemsareassignedthesamerankifthedifferencebetweentheirimpactsiswithin10%ofthesmallerofthetwonumbers.TheplasticDysonAirbladehanddryerhasthelowestimpactforallofthemetrics,followedbythealuminumDysonAirbladehanddryerandtheXLERATORdryerforallmetricsexceptwaterconsumption,wheretheimpactofthecottonrolltowelsisessentiallyequivalenttothatoftheplasticDysonAirblade.Thus,therankorderofthetopthreeproductsisnearlyindependentofthemethodusedtocalculateimpact.Therankorderofthestandarddryerandthetowels,however,ismorestronglydependentontheimpactassessmentmethod,althoughafewgeneralizationscanbemade:thestandarddryerandvirginpapertowelsystemsarealmostconsistentlyassociatedwiththehighestimpact,regardlessofimpactassessmentmethod;assuch,cottonrolltowelimpactisalwayslessthanvirginpapertowelimpact,asisthatoftherecycledpapertowels.Thesignificanceofthedifferencebetweendryingsystemenvironmentalimpactvaluesislaterevaluatedinthescenariouncertaintyanalysis(Section5.2.1)andthebillofactivitiesuncertaintyanalysis(Section5.2.2)
Table9Rankorderofenvironmentalimpactoftheproductsusingthebaselinescenarioandmeasureddrytimesforalloftheimpactassessmentmetrics(1=lowestimpact,7=highestimpact).
Productsystem
Globalwarmingpotential
Humanhealth
Ecosystemquality
Cumulativeenergydemand
Waterconsumption
Landoccupation
Airblade,aluminum 1 1 1 1 3 1Airblade,plastic 1 1 1 1 1 1
XLERATOR 3 3 3 3 4 3
Standarddryer 7 7 4 6 7 4Cottonrolltowels 4 3 6 4 1 6
Papertowels,virgin 5 5 7 7 5 7
Papertowels,100%recy. 5 5 4 5 5 5
4.3 AdditionalproductlifecyclesEachdryingsystemiscomprisedofmultipleproductsthatarerequiredtofulfillafunctionalunit(seeTable1).Globalwarmingpotentialandotherimpactresultscanthereforebebrokendownnotonlybylifecyclestage,butalsobythesedifferentproducts.Figure11showstheportionofeachdryingsystemsGWPattributedtoeachoftheseproducts.Fordryers,theonlyotherproductispackaging,
-
34
whichaccountsforaverysmallfractionoftotalimpact.SlightlymoreoftowelGWPsareassociatedwithpackaging,dispensers,wastebins,andbinliners,butthemajorityoftheimpactisstillduetothetowelsthemselves.
Figure11GWPofhanddryingsystems,brokendownbyproduct.
4.4 ContributionanalysisforindividualproductsThissectionincludesacloserlookattheenvironmentalimpactofthedifferenthanddryingsystems,specificallythecontributionstoanddriversofthatimpact.4.4.1 DryersAscanbeseenfromFigure5,thematerials,manufacturing,transportation,andendoflifestagesofhanddryerscompriseasmallfractionofthetotalimpactassociatedwithdryingonepairofhandsaround4%to13%ofGWPwhencalculatedusingmeasureddrytimes.Consequently,alteringtheassumptionsrelatedtotheselifecyclestages,suchasaccountingforscraplossinXLERATORandstandarddryerproductionorlocatingproductioninChina,willhaveminimalaffectonthefinalimpactresults.Nonetheless,itisstillimportanttomorecloselyevaluatethesestagesmaterialsandmanufacturinginparticularastheyaremuchhigherthantheothertwobecausetheyarecollectivelyresponsibleforasmuchas283kgCO2eqbeforetheirimpactsareallocatedamongthe350,000handdryingsthattakeplaceduringadryerslifetime.Additionalevaluationwillalsohelptoinformproductdesigndecisions.Theproduction(i.e.materialsandmanufacturing)stageGWP,beforeallocationamonglifetimeuses,isbrokendowninFigure12forthealuminumandplasticDysonAirbladehanddryers,andinFigures13and14fortheXLERATORandstandarddryers,respectively.AscanbeseenfromFigure12,over75%oftheimpactisduetothreeprocesses:electricity,steelsheet,andaluminumorPC/ABS.Thesteel
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
Glob
alwa
rmingp
oten
tial[g
CO2eq
] BinlinersWastebinDispenser
Packaging
Towel
Dryer
-
35
sheetandaluminumorPC/ABSdominateimpactbecauseoftheirhighmassesrelativetothoseofotherdryercomponents:aluminumandPC/ABSareusedforthedryercoversandsteelsheetforthedryerbackplateplus,inthecaseoftheplasticdryer,reinforcementbrackets.Electricity,ontheotherhand,dominatesbecausethedryerisassumedtobemanufacturedinChinaandthereforeusesacarbonintensivegridmix.Theremainingcomponents,whichformthedryermotor,ducts,electronics,andsoforth,arelessthan25%ofproductionimpact.
Figure12Breakdownofproduction(materials&manufacturing)phaseGWPfor(a)aluminumand(b)
plasticDysonAirbladehanddryers.
OverhalftheproductionGWPsoftheXLERATORandstandarddryersareduetothedryerscontrolandopticsassemblies(Figures13and14).Theseassemblies,however,accountforlessthan3%ofdryermass(seeTable19intheAppendix).GiventheiroutsizedimpactinproportiontotheirmassesaswellasrelativetoDysonAirbladehanddryerresults(theDysonAirbladehanddryerscircuitboards,bycontrast,accountforlessthan2%ofproductionGWP),thereisanopportunitytotakeacloserlookatthematerialsandmanufacturingprocessesthatgointoproducingtheseassemblies.Specifically,moreinformationabouttheassembliesintheXLERATORandstandarddryersisneededbecausetheirinventoriesarecurrentlymodeledwithagenericunitprocessfromecoinvent,Electroniccomponent,active,unspecified,whichmaynotaccuratelyrepresentthem;bycontrast,moredetailsareknownabouttheDysonAirbladehanddryerselectroniccomponentsandamorespecificunitprocess,Printedwiringboard,throughhole,leadfreesurface,isused.TheuseofthegenericecoinventprocesstomodeltheelectronicsoftheXLERATORandstandarddryersisexaminedmorecloselyinSection5.1.6aspartofthesensitivityanalysis.ElectricityusedinmanufacturingtheXLERATORandthestandarddryersrepresentsthesecondlargestcontributorstotheproductionstageGWP,consistentwiththechartsinFigure12.SincetheXLERATOR
AluminumElectricity
Steelsheet
Melamine
PkgingGFRP
PS PP
Other
(a)AluminumAirbladeProductionGWP:
191kgCO2 eq/dryer
PC/ABS
Electricity
Steelsheet
Melamine
Pkging
GFRP PSPP
Other
(b)PlasticAirbladeProductionGWP:
113kgCO2 eq/dryer
-
36
coverisassumedtobeacombinationofthedryersthreedifferentcoversstainlesssteel,plastic,andchromefinishnoonematerialdominatesbymass.
Figure13BreakdownofproductionphaseGWPfortheXLERATORdryer.
Figure14BreakdownofproductionphaseGWPforastandarddryer.
Control,optics
assembly
Electricity
Steel
GFRP
Naturalgas
Zinc
Other
ProductionGWP:275kgCO2 eq/dryer
Control,optics
assembly
Electricity
Steel
Aluminum
Naturalgas Zinc Other
ProductionGWP:271kgCO2 eq/dryer
-
37
Asnotedearlier,alteringtheassumptionsrelatedtotheproduction,transportation,andendoflifestageswillhaveminimalaffectonthetotalGWPassociatedwithdryingonepairofhandswithahanddryer.Assumptionsrelatedtotheusephase,however,cansignificantlychangeGWPbecausetheusephasedominatestotalimpact.Usephaseimpactisdrivenentirelybyelectricityconsumption,mostofwhichoccurswhenthedryerisinuseratherthanwhenitisspinningdownoronstandby(Figure15).Thesensitivityanalysis(Section5.1)includesanassessmentofuseintensity,whichdefineshowlonguserswaittodrytheirhandsandtherebyaffectsusestageGWP;powerconsumptionisconsideredfixedforthisstudy.
Figure15BreakdownofdryerusestageGWP.
4.4.2 CottonrolltowelsLikedryers,cottonrolltowelshavetheirproduction,transportation,andendoflifestageimpactsallocatedacrossmultipleuses.Forcottonrolltowels,thisisthe103times[12]theycanbereusedbeforedisposal.Producingtheequivalentofonepullonacottontowelroll,however,stillemits253gCO2eq.Thebreakdownofcottonrolltowelproduction(Figure16)showsthatweavingaccountsforalargefractionofGWPonaccountofitsenergyrequirements,whereassizing,theadditionofstarchtoyarntofacilitateweaving,islessthan1%ofthetotal.OverhalfofthetotalGWPassociatedwithusingacottonrolltoweltodryapairofhands,though,isduetotheusestagespecificallylaunderingthetowels(Figure5).Withinthisprocess,thenaturalgasrequiredtoheatthewaterandthermallydisinfectthetowelscontributesthemosttousephaseimpact(Figure17);transportationtoandfromlaundryfacilitiesisnotincludedinthefigure.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Airblade XLERATOR Standarddryer
Use
stage
globa
lwarmingp
oten
tial[g
CO2eq
] Standby
SpindownInuse
-
38
Figure16GWPbreakdownofproducingtheequivalentofonepullonacottontowelroll.
Figure17GWPbreakdownofwashingcottonrolltowel(usestageimpact).
Cottonfibers
Spinning
Sizing
Weaving
Desizing/scouring/bleaching
ProductionGWP:253gCO2 eq/pull
Naturalgas
Electricity
Soap
Sewage
WashingGWP:6.78gCO2 eq/pull/use
-
39
4.4.3 PapertowelsPapertowelscontributethemosttosystemimpactintheirrespectivehanddryingsystems:asFigure11shows,packaging,dispensers,wastebins,andbinlinersaccountforlessthan10%oftotalGWP.Mostofthisimpact,inturn,canbeattributedtopulpproductionandtowelmanufacturing(Figure5).TheresultsinFigures59indicatethatpapertowelswithrecycledcontenthavealowerimpactthanvirginpapertowelsforfourofthesixmetrics.Theextentofthedifferenceinimpactdependsonthemetric:inthecaseofGWP,humanhealth,andwaterconsumption,thedifferencebetweentheimpactsofthetwosystemsislessthan10%;thisisreflectedinthedryingsystemrankingsinTable9wherebothpapertowelsystemsareassignedthesamerank.Thisconclusion,naturally,issubjecttopulpingprocessdataandtheassumptionthattherecycledpulpingprocessisthesameasthevirginpulpingprocess.Theconclusioncouldpotentiallychangeifprocessesotherthansulfatepulpareusedandifinventorydataonarecycledpulpingprocesswereused.Thedifferencebetweenthetwosystemsismorepronouncedforecosystemquality,CED,andlandoccupation.VirginpapertowelshaveahigherCEDbecausethemetricaccountsfortheenergyembodiedinthewood.Likewise,thisneedforwoodcontributestothelandoccupationmetric,whichitselfispartoftheecosystemqualitycalculationintheIMPACT2002+LCIAmethodology(see[50]).Figures18and19respectivelybreakdowntheGWPandCEDassociatedwithpapertowelproductionintopulpmanufacturingandtheprocessesrequiredtoproducepapertowelsfrompulp.Pulpmanufacturingisinturnbrokendownintotheimpactduetowoodorwastepaperandthemanufacturingprocess.Asthechartsshow,theGWPbreakdownsofbothpapertoweltypesareverysimilar,partlybecausetheGWPLCIAmethodologydoesnotaccountforbiogeniccarbonembodiedinthewood.Therenewableenergycontentinthepaper(analogoustobiogeniccarbon),however,isaccountedforintheCEDLCIAmethodology:theenergyembodiedinthewoodusedinmanufacturingvirginpulpincreasesthepulpscontributiontoCEDaswellastheoverallimpact(seeFigure7).
-
40
Figure18GWPbreakdownofpapertowelproductionfrom(a)virginand(b)recycledcontent.
Figure19CEDbreakdownofpapertowelproductionfrom(a)virginand(b)recycledcontent.
5 LifecycleinterpretationThelifecycleinterpretationsectionfocusesonunderstandingthelifecycleimpactassessmentresultswithinthecontextoftheanalysislimitations,uncertainty,andassumptions.Thisisaccomplishedwith
Wood
Pulpmfg
Electricity
Naturalgas
Sewage
(a) VirgincontentProductionGWP:
5.96gCO2eq/towel
Wastepaper
Pulpmfg
Electricity
Naturalgas
Sewage
(b) RecycledcontentProductionGWP:
6.08gCO2eq/towel
Wood
Pulpmfg
Electricity
Naturalgas
Sewage
(a) VirgincontentProductionCED:197kJ/towel
Wastepaper
Pulpmfg
Electricity
Naturalgas
Sewage
(b) RecycledcontentProductionCED:103kJ/towel
-
41
sensitivityanduncertaintyanalyses.Theformerevaluatesvariabilityinbaselinescenarioassumptions,oneparameteratatime,whilethelatterexploressimultaneousvariationofparametersaswellasaddressesuncertaintyinthebillofactivitiesdata.ApedigreematrixandMonteCarlosimulationarerespectivelyusedtoquantifyandtopropagateuncertaintiesintheanalysis.5.1 SensitivityanalysisOnescenarioalonecannotaccountforthewiderangeofusagepatternsorotherparametersthatcanaffectenvironmentalimpact.Sensitivityanalysesarethereforeconductedtoaddressthevariabilityinthebaselinescenariosassumptions.Assumptionsaddressedinclude:
Lifetimeusage Manufacturingphaseelectricgridmix Usephaseelectricgridmix Useintensity Endoflifescenario Dryerelectronicsunitprocess Cottonrolltowelreuses Papertowelmass Pulpmanufacturingprocess Endoflifeallocationmethodologyforrecycledcontentinpapertowels Manufacturinglocation Uselocation
Intheseanalyses,thehanddryingsystemGWPsarecomparedunderdifferentscenariostoassesstherobustnessoftheobservationinSection4.2thathighspeeddryershavethelowestimpactofallthesystems.Theseanalysesarealsousedtoevaluatehowdifferentfactorsaffecteachsystemsenvironmentalburdenandwhichofthosefactorsmatterthemost.Theresultsindicatethatelectricgridmixanduseintensity(Sections5.1.25.1.4)exertthelargestinfluenceondryingsystemGWP.Later,aMonteCarlosimulation(Section5.2.1)isusedtoevaluatetheuncertaintysurroundingthebaselinescenarioassumptions.DryerimpactiscalculatedassumingmeasureddrytimeasassessedwiththeNSFProtocolP335.5.1.1 LifetimeusageThebaselinescenarioassumesalifetimeusageof350,000pairsofhandsdriedovera5yeartimeframe[26,27].Theactualnumberofuses,however,couldbehigherorlower,dependingonwashroom
-
42
traffic:forinstance,theExcelstudyassumes260,000pairsofhandsaredriedover10years[14].Figure20illustratestheeffectofbothlowerandhigherusageoverthe5yeartimeframe.Increasingusagereducesimpactbecausetheproductionandendoflifeburdensofthedryer(ordispenser,packaging,etc.)arespreadovermorepairsofhands.ForthealuminumDysonAirbladehanddryersystem,anincreaseinusageto450,000resultsinalessthan4%decreaseinimpact;thischangeisevenlowerfortheothersystemsaslittleas0.4%forthecottonrolltowelsystem.Thus,changinglifetimeusagealoneisnotsufficienttofavoreithercottonorpapertowelsoverthehighspeedhanddryers.
Figure20EffectofproductlifetimeusageondryingsystemGWP.
5.1.2 ManufacturingstageelectricgridmixThisnextsensitivityanalysisinvestigatestheconsequencesofalteringthemanufacturingstageelectricgridmixbyassessingdryingsystemGWPgiventwohypotheticalextremes:acarbonintensiveallcoalgridandagreenerallhydropowergrid.Ahypotheticalallnucleargridisalsoaddedforcomparison.Theanalysisaccountsfortheassumptionthatpapertowelsaremanufacturedinadifferentlocationfromdryersandcottonrolltowelsbyassumingthehypotheticalgridmixesusetechnologiesappropriateforeachdryingsystemsmanufacturinglocation.Thatis,thehypotheticalallcoalgridfordryerproductionassumesChinesetechnologyandtherebyassociatedemissionsfactorswhereastheallcoalgridforpapertowelmanufacturingassumesUStechnology.AsseenfromtheresultsinFigure21,alteringthemanufacturingstagegridmixminimallyaffectsdryerGWPbecausethisstageaccountsforaverysmallfractionofoverallenvironmentalimpact(seeFigure5).Theoppositeistrueofpapertowels,whichderivethemajorityoftheirimpactfrommaterialsandmanufacturing.Theuseofagreenergrid,however,cannotcompletelyeliminatepapertowelemissionsbecausesomeoftheemissionsarederivedfromthepulpingprocess,aswellasfromnaturalgasusedintissuemanufacturing(seeFigure18).Cottonrolltowelsfallsomewhereinbetweenthesetwoextremes
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Airblade,aluminum
Airblade,plastic
XLERATOR Standarddryer
Cottonrolltowels
Papertowels,virgin
Papertowels,100%
recycled
Glob
alwa
rmingp
oten
tial[g
CO2eq
] 150,000
250,000
350,000(baseline)450,000
-
43
becausewhiletheirproductionaccountsforalargerfractionofGWPcomparedtothedryers,over50%ofimpactisduetotheusestage.
Figure21EffectofalteringmanufacturingphasegridmixondryingsystemGWP.
5.1.3 UsephaseelectricgridmixInadditiontothemanufacturingstageelectricgridmixanalysis,ausestagegridmixanalysisisalsoconducted.Thelatterisaccomplishedinsimilarfashionwithhypotheticalallcoal,allhydropower,andallnucleargridsusedtoassesstheconsequencesofvaryinggridmixondryingsystemGWP.SinceusestageisassumedtotakeplaceintheUS,allhypotheticalgridsassumeUStechnologyandemissionsfactors.Onlytheimpactsofdryerandcottonrolltowelsystemsareaffected:theimpactsofthepapertowelsystemsdonotchangeasnousestageelectricityconsumptionisassociatedwiththosesystems.TheeffectofthedifferentgridsisshowninFigure22.SincetheUSreliesoncoalforaround45%ofitsgrid[51],thebaselineisalreadycarbonintensive.Thus,GWPincreasesonaverage53%forthehighspeeddryerswhentheyarerunonanallcoalgrid.Bycontrast,hydropowerandnucleargridsaremuchlesscarbonintensive,whichallowsdryerimpacttodecre