Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

13
Michael Le*enmeier – Senja Laakso – Viivi Toivio Dmat ltd. – Wuppertal Ins@tute – Aalto University – Helsinki University Scien@fic session 3: Lifestyles and educa@on WRF, Davos, 12 th Oct. 2015 Future households: Smaller footprint, be6er life

Transcript of Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

Page 1: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

Michael  Le*enmeier  –  Senja  Laakso  –  Viivi  Toivio  D-­‐mat  ltd.  –  Wuppertal  Ins@tute  –  Aalto  University  –  Helsinki  University  

     

Scien@fic  session  3:  Lifestyles  and  educa@on  WRF,  Davos,  12th  Oct.  2015  

         

Future  households:  Smaller  footprint,  be6er  life  

Page 2: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

1  12.10.2015  Le*enmeier      Laakso        Toivio        Future  households  

One  of  the  biggest  lifestyle  changes  we  know  

          [email protected]  

Page 3: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

2  12.10.2015  Le*enmeier      Laakso        Toivio        Future  households  

The  Sustainable  Consump?on  Challenge    Lifestyle  Material  Footprint  from  40  to  8  Tonnes  

11  tonnes  

6  tonnes  

18  tonnes  

1,5  tonnes  

3  tonnes  

2  tonnes  

2015   2050  

01/14/2015  Le*enmeier  et  al.  2014,  Eight  tonnes  of  material  footprint,  www.mdpi.com/2079-­‐9276/3/3/488    

Page 4: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

www.scp-­‐centre.org      |    Slide   3  

             

CURRENT MATERIAL FOOTPRINT OF THE AVERAGE BRAZILIAN

Food  &  Nutri@on  The  Home  Household  goods  Mobility  Leisure  ac@vi@es  Other  purposes  

4.1  

2.6  

0.7  0.8  

2.1  

1.0  

11.4  ton/cap/a  

Page 5: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

4  12.10.2015  Le*enmeier      Laakso        Toivio        Future  households  

 Material  footprint  

=  ecological  backpack  Invisible  burden  any  product  carries  

Measuring  resource  use  Material  Footprint  

13/10/2015  

©  [email protected]  

©  [email protected]  

§  Abio@c  material  resources  +  bio@c  material  resources    +  top  soil  erosion  in  agri-­‐/silviculture  

§  Holis@c,  though  rough  indicator    

§  Sufficient,  input-­‐based  indicator  although  not  addressing  individual  environmental  problems  Schmidt-­‐Bleek  1993,  Schmidt-­‐Bleek  2009,  Le*enmeier  et  al.  2009    

Page 6: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

Finnish  Innova?on  Fund  (Sitra):  Resource-­‐wise  region  model  in  Jyväskylä    Targets  for  2050  

5  

Zero  CO2  emissions  

Zero  waste  

One  planet  life  

Page 7: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

6  12.10.2015  Le*enmeier      Laakso        Toivio        Future  households  

5  households  out  of  40  applicants  

6  

Page 8: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

7  12.10.2015  Le*enmeier      Laakso        Toivio        Future  households  

Transi?on  towards  sustainability  

7  Schneidewind  &  Scheck  2012  

Page 9: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

8  12.10.2015  Le*enmeier      Laakso        Toivio        Future  households  

Future  household  project  

8  

1.    Material  footprint  

assessment  

2.    Household-­‐specific  roadmaps  

4.    Up-­‐scaling  to  new  city  district  

3.    One  month  

test  of  future  life  

Page 10: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

9  12.10.2015  Le*enmeier      Laakso        Toivio        Future  households  

Results:  Smaller  footprints,  be6er  life  

Page 11: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

10  12.10.2015  Le*enmeier      Laakso        Toivio        Future  households  

Observa?ons  during  and  a[er  the  project  •  Engaged  households,  ambi@oned  experiments,  e.g.  

–  smaller  living  space,  –  vegan  nutri@on,  –  less  car-­‐driving  by  car-­‐sharing,  car-­‐pooling,  home  delivery,  be*er  and  more  

flexible  public  transport,  …  

•  Material  footprint  can  drop  even  fast  –  Quality  of  life  increased  

•  Households  will  not  do  it  alone  –  Sitra  funded  simula@on  of  future  services  –  City  implemented  results  in  planning  of  new  district  –  How  to  encourage  new  service  providers?  

•  Lighthouse  households  keeping  up  the  issue  –  High  interest  of  media  during  the  project  –  1  year  ajer  :  households  s@ll  ac@ve  in  blogging,  pos@ng  –  and  implemen@ng!  

•  8  tonnes  concept  spreading  to  other  ci@es  

Page 12: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

11  12.10.2015  Le*enmeier      Laakso        Toivio        Future  households  

Conclusions  

•  Lifestyle  material  footprint  as  an  indicator  works  well  •  Significant  reduc@ons  in  lifestyle  material  footprints  by  

rela@vely  few  changes  and  even  in  the  short  term  •  Rethinking  the  everyday  also  increases  quality  of  life  •  Households  con@nued  implementa@on  ajer  the  project  

–  Relevant  changes  done  –  Iden@fica@on  with  project  and  resource  issue  is  s@ll  high  

•  Households  will  not  do  it  alone  –  All  services  do  not  yet  exist  –  How  to  speed  up  on  the  supply  side?  –  How  to  avoid  locking  into  present  unsustainable  infrastructure?  –  Growing  importance  of  interac@on  between  gatekeepers  and  users  

•  Way  to  go  in  mainstreaming  –  City  of  Lah@  star@ng  “One  tonne  less”  campaign  

Page 13: Lettenmeier wrf2015 ss3_151012

 

Michael  Le*enmeier  Michael@d-­‐mat.fi    +358  40  54  12  876  

 www.d-­‐mat.fi    www.facebook.com/materialfootprint    

www.twi*er.com/le*enmeier      

     

Thank  you!