La Mallorca v de Jesus

download La Mallorca v de Jesus

of 2

Transcript of La Mallorca v de Jesus

  • 7/25/2019 La Mallorca v de Jesus

    1/2

    Page 1of 2

    Republic of the PhilippinesSUPREME COURT

    Manila

    EN BANC

    G.R. No. L-21486 May 14, 1966

    LA MALLORCA and PAMPANGA BUS COMPANY,petitioner,

    vs.

    VALENTN !E "ESUS, MANOLO TOLENTNO and COURT O# APPEALS,respondents.

    Manuel O. Chan for petitioners.

    Sixto T. Antonio for respondents.

    MA$ALNTAL, J.:

    La Mallorca and Pampanga Bus Compan, !nc., commonl "no#n as La Mallorca$Pambusco, filed this appeal

    bcertiorarifrom the decision of the Court of Appeals #hich affirmed that rendered b the Court of %irst !nstance of

    Bulacan in its civil case No. &'((, entitled )*alentin de +esus and Manolo olentino vs. La Mallorca$Pambusco.) he

    court a quosentenced the defendant, no# petitioner, )to pa to plaintiffs the amount of P&,'-&.( for actual

    damages/ P'0,0((.(( as compensator damages/ P'(,(((.(( to each plaintiff b #a of moral damages/ and

    P-,(((.(( as counsel fees.)

    #o errors are attributed to the appellate Court1 2'3 )in sustaining the decision 2of the court a quo3 holding that the

    petitioners #ere liable for the accident #hich #as caused b a blo#$out of one of the tires of the bus and in not

    considering the same as caso fortuito,) and 2&3 in holding petitioners liable for moral damages.

    he suit arose b reason of the death of Lolita de +esus, &($ear old daughter of *alentin de +esus and #ife of

    Manolo olentino, in a head$on collision bet#een petitioner4s bus, on #hich she #as a passenger, and a freight truc"

    traveling in the opposite direction, in a barrio in Marilao Bulacan, in the morning of 5ctober 6, '77. he immediate

    cause of the collision #as the fact that the driver of the bus lost control of the #heel #hen its left front tire suddenl

    e8ploded.

    Petitioner maintains that a tire blo#$out is a fortuitous event and gives rise to no liabilit for negligence, citing the

    rulings of the Court of Appeals in Rodriguez vs. Red Line Transportation Co., CA$9.R. No. 6'-:, ;ecember &7,

    '70, and People vs. Palapad, CA$9.R. No. '606(, +une &

  • 7/25/2019 La Mallorca v de Jesus

    2/2

    Page 2of 2

    +engzon& C.,.& +autista Angelo& Concepcion& Re*es& ,.+.L.& +arrera& -izon& Regala& +engzon& ,.'.& aldivar and

    Sanchez& ,,.& concur.