Kyoto U - Title 京都東山の地形景域の構造と名勝地の景観 ......¿4 ¾ £ b g æ b...

13
Title 京都東山の地形景域の構造と名勝地の景観 -開度の概念 に基づく地形的囲繞の評価- Author(s) 山口, 敬太; 土屋, 峻; 久保田, 善明; 川崎, 雅史 Citation 土木学会論文集 D1 (2013), 69(1): 64-75 Issue Date 2013 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/179304 Right © 2013 公益社団法人 土木学会 Type Journal Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University

Transcript of Kyoto U - Title 京都東山の地形景域の構造と名勝地の景観 ......¿4 ¾ £ b g æ b...

  • Title 京都東山の地形景域の構造と名勝地の景観 -開度の概念に基づく地形的囲繞の評価-

    Author(s) 山口, 敬太; 土屋, 峻; 久保田, 善明; 川崎, 雅史

    Citation 土木学会論文集 D1 (2013), 69(1): 64-75

    Issue Date 2013

    URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/179304

    Right © 2013 公益社団法人 土木学会

    Type Journal Article

    Textversion publisher

    Kyoto University

  • 1 2 3 4

    1 615-8540 C1 E-mail: [email protected]

    2 530-0005 2-2-7

    3 615-8540 C1 E-mail: [email protected]

    4 615-8540 C1 E-mail: [email protected]

    90 500m

    1) 2)

    3) 4)

    Key Words : landscape, topographic enclosure, openness, spatial scale, Japanese garden

    1. (1)

    (1)

    1)

    -1

    2

    (2)

    1) 2)

    3)

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    64

  • (2)

    2)

    3)

    4)

    3 4km

    5)

    6)

    7)

    8)

    9)

    10), 11)

    12)

    13)

    14)

    -1 1808

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    65

  • 15)

    5m 10m

    10m16

    2

    2.

    (1)

    14)

    1999

    850m

    10m2009 2

    16 -24 10m

    4 10 2 m 810 29 m1.5m

    16-2 d -2 e

    10m

    Arcmap ESRI

    (2) ”

    ” “ 2

    < >

    < >

    16a ia ia 22.5 36016 22.5 ia

    a 9

    < >

    < >

    16b ib

    di di / ibb 5

    “ ”

    “ ”

    9

    1km1~6km 6~12

    -2a 16 d e

    50m 20m

    e

    d

    5 9

    d 1 d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 d 6 d 7

    d 8

    -2b

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    66

  • 12

    16) 910)

    17)

    16

    -2b

    10) (3)

    6 125

    2

    300m 2000m7)

    90 18)

    300m 90300m 2000m 90

    (4) -3

    -1

    -3 / -1

    m

    -4 1799

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    67

  • (3)

    19) 1799

    20)

    -4

    3. (1) “

    ” “ ” 5“ ”

    1000m500m -5 -

    500m -8

    200~300m

    9“ ” 9

    -5, 8

    “ ”(5)

    120~145

    -

    1799

    990 500m

    -1

    (2)

    (6) 9

    90

    15 /200m

    113

    ,

    9

    9

    9

    106° 78° 19.1° 185° 135-158° 0-200m

    53° 26° 11.3° 116° 113-135° 200-300m

    73° 58° 14.2° 126° 113-135° 300-500m

    128° 73° 18.2° 107° 113-135° 300-500m

    91° 91° 15.8° 96° 90-112° 300-500m

    79° 79° 17.7° 99° 90-112° 300-500m

    65° 65° 16.0° 86° 90-112° 300-500m

    73° 73° 26.0° 262° 203-225° 200-300m

    29° 29° 21.1° 183° 180-202° 300-500m

    62° 61° 13.9° 140° 135-158° 500-1000m

    - - - 137° 113-135° 500-1000m

    -1

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    68

  • -6

    500~1000m

    150m200~300m

    120m 0~200m

    -7 1864

    -5 11

    500-1000 1000-2000 (m)

    0 100 200 300m

    78-90 90-113 113-135

    135-158 158-180 180-203

    135-158 158-180 180-203

    0-200 200-300 300-500

    0-23 23-45 45-78

    203-

    -1

    + -6

    15

    -1

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    69

  • 15 /200m

    -8 11

    500-1000 1000-2000 (m)

    0 100 200 300m 78-90 90-113 113-135

    135-158 158-180 180-203

    135-158 158-180 180-203

    0-200 200-300 300-500

    0-23 23-45 45-78

    203-

    -1

    + -9

    15

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    70

  • -6

    -7

    21)

    (3)

    -8

    500m 9 90~135

    -8

    -9110

    300~500m

    112~135

    (4)

    -10 15 /

    0 9-10 -10

    -9

    m

    m

    -10 / 15 /

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    71

  • 20~40

    20~50

    4.

    (1)

    22) 1911-2

    (7)

    -2

    (2)

    -3

    300m

    1911)

    ,

    (8)

    , ,

    ,

    ,

    0-200m 185°

    200-300m 262°

    200-300m 116°

    a 300-500m 96°

    a 300-500m 99°

    b 300-500m 183°

    b 500-1000m 140°

    b 500-1000m 137°

    b 300-500m 86°

    c 300-500m 126°

    c 300-500m 107°

    -3

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    72

  • 4)

    -3180

    500m

    3

    a) 3

    90-100 -1

    -4

    -11 b)

    c)

    100

    a, c

    1)

    2) 3)

    5.

    2

    9 90500m

    9 90

    -11

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    73

  • 1)

    2) 3)

    (1)

    -

    - (61), 29-36, 1987

    (2)

    .

    ,

    , 1985 (3) 5

    6~12 6km

    (4)

    10m DEM

    (5) --

    (6) 1264

    1291 1977 1940-

    1954 (7)

    1910

    1910 (8)

    1) 15, A1-A7, 2004.

    2) Vol.

    74, No. 5, pp. 389-394, 2011. 3)

    D, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 598-607, 2008.

    4)

    D, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 317-328, 2009. 5)

    No. 31, pp. 607-612, 1996.

    6)

    No. 35, pp. 697-702, 2000. 7) 2006. 8)

    Vol. 42, No. I2, CD-ROM, 2010. 9)

    D, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 46-53, 2010. 10) 1975. 11) 1981. 12)

    No. 31-2, pp. 107-144, 1992. 13)

    No. 33, pp. 5-690, 1998.

    14) Vol. 38, No. 4,

    pp. 26-34, 1999. 15) Space

    SyntaxNo. 7, pp. 72-80, 2011.

    16) No. 462, pp. 147-156, 1994.

    17) Spreiregen, P. D.: Urban Design, the Architecture of Towns

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    74

  • and Cities, McGraw-Hill, p.77, 1965H.,

    1966. 18)

    1984. 19) 1799

    http://www.nichibun.ac.jp

    20) 1Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 19-24, 1983.

    21) 1864

    http://www.nichibun.ac.jp 22) 1911.

    (2013. 1. 21 )

    LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE AND VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HIGASHIYAMA DISTRICT, KYOTO

    —EVALUATING TOPOGRAPHIC ENCLOSURE BY OPENNESS—

    Keita YAMAGUCHI, Takashi TSUCHIYA, Yoshiaki KUBOTA and Masashi KAWASAKI

    This study aims at clarifying the landscape structure and its visual characteristics of the Higashiyama

    district, Kyoto, by evaluating topographic enclosure by Openness and visualizing a distribution pattern of topographic enclosure. The results presented in this paper indicated that the area strongly enclosed by mountains ranged locally in the bottom of mountains and most of temples and scenic places located in these enclosed spaces. It is found that the spatial compositions in scenic places imply a traditional landscape design method of using topographic conditions and landscape characteristics. The main findings are described below: 1) in scenic places that were enclosed by mountains at a short distance, gardens were composed of spatially opened viewpoints created in the enclosed space. In scenic places that were enclosed by mountains at a middle distance, 2) gardens were composed of a contiguous view of mountain slopes and buildings, 3) spaces between a garden and mountains were hidden to combine views of gardens and mountains, 4) spatially opened viewpoints were created to get a view of a surrounding landscape. It is found that scenic places of the Higashiyama district are strongly characterized by the topographic enclosure that is one of significant features of religious spaces in Japan.

    土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.

    75