Kyoto U - Title 京都東山の地形景域の構造と名勝地の景観 ......¿4 ¾ £ b g æ b...
Transcript of Kyoto U - Title 京都東山の地形景域の構造と名勝地の景観 ......¿4 ¾ £ b g æ b...
-
Title 京都東山の地形景域の構造と名勝地の景観 -開度の概念に基づく地形的囲繞の評価-
Author(s) 山口, 敬太; 土屋, 峻; 久保田, 善明; 川崎, 雅史
Citation 土木学会論文集 D1 (2013), 69(1): 64-75
Issue Date 2013
URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/179304
Right © 2013 公益社団法人 土木学会
Type Journal Article
Textversion publisher
Kyoto University
-
1 2 3 4
1 615-8540 C1 E-mail: [email protected]
2 530-0005 2-2-7
3 615-8540 C1 E-mail: [email protected]
4 615-8540 C1 E-mail: [email protected]
90 500m
1) 2)
3) 4)
Key Words : landscape, topographic enclosure, openness, spatial scale, Japanese garden
1. (1)
(1)
1)
-1
2
(2)
1) 2)
3)
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
64
-
(2)
2)
3)
4)
3 4km
5)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10), 11)
12)
13)
14)
-1 1808
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
65
-
15)
5m 10m
10m16
2
2.
(1)
14)
1999
850m
10m2009 2
16 -24 10m
4 10 2 m 810 29 m1.5m
16-2 d -2 e
10m
Arcmap ESRI
(2) ”
” “ 2
< >
< >
16a ia ia 22.5 36016 22.5 ia
a 9
< >
< >
16b ib
di di / ibb 5
“ ”
“ ”
9
1km1~6km 6~12
-2a 16 d e
50m 20m
e
d
5 9
d 1 d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 d 6 d 7
d 8
-2b
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
66
-
12
16) 910)
17)
16
-2b
10) (3)
6 125
2
300m 2000m7)
90 18)
300m 90300m 2000m 90
(4) -3
-1
-3 / -1
m
-4 1799
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
67
-
(3)
19) 1799
20)
-4
3. (1) “
” “ ” 5“ ”
1000m500m -5 -
500m -8
200~300m
9“ ” 9
-5, 8
“ ”(5)
120~145
-
1799
990 500m
-1
(2)
(6) 9
90
15 /200m
113
,
9
9
9
106° 78° 19.1° 185° 135-158° 0-200m
53° 26° 11.3° 116° 113-135° 200-300m
73° 58° 14.2° 126° 113-135° 300-500m
128° 73° 18.2° 107° 113-135° 300-500m
91° 91° 15.8° 96° 90-112° 300-500m
79° 79° 17.7° 99° 90-112° 300-500m
65° 65° 16.0° 86° 90-112° 300-500m
73° 73° 26.0° 262° 203-225° 200-300m
29° 29° 21.1° 183° 180-202° 300-500m
62° 61° 13.9° 140° 135-158° 500-1000m
- - - 137° 113-135° 500-1000m
-1
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
68
-
-6
500~1000m
150m200~300m
120m 0~200m
-7 1864
-5 11
500-1000 1000-2000 (m)
0 100 200 300m
78-90 90-113 113-135
135-158 158-180 180-203
135-158 158-180 180-203
0-200 200-300 300-500
0-23 23-45 45-78
203-
-1
+ -6
15
-1
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
69
-
15 /200m
-8 11
500-1000 1000-2000 (m)
0 100 200 300m 78-90 90-113 113-135
135-158 158-180 180-203
135-158 158-180 180-203
0-200 200-300 300-500
0-23 23-45 45-78
203-
-1
+ -9
15
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
70
-
-6
-7
21)
(3)
-8
500m 9 90~135
-8
-9110
300~500m
112~135
(4)
-10 15 /
0 9-10 -10
-9
m
m
-10 / 15 /
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
71
-
20~40
20~50
4.
(1)
22) 1911-2
(7)
-2
(2)
-3
300m
1911)
,
(8)
, ,
,
,
0-200m 185°
200-300m 262°
200-300m 116°
a 300-500m 96°
a 300-500m 99°
b 300-500m 183°
b 500-1000m 140°
b 500-1000m 137°
b 300-500m 86°
c 300-500m 126°
c 300-500m 107°
-3
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
72
-
4)
-3180
500m
3
a) 3
90-100 -1
-4
-11 b)
c)
100
a, c
1)
2) 3)
5.
2
9 90500m
9 90
-11
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
73
-
1)
2) 3)
(1)
-
- (61), 29-36, 1987
(2)
.
,
, 1985 (3) 5
6~12 6km
(4)
10m DEM
(5) --
(6) 1264
1291 1977 1940-
1954 (7)
1910
1910 (8)
1) 15, A1-A7, 2004.
2) Vol.
74, No. 5, pp. 389-394, 2011. 3)
D, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 598-607, 2008.
4)
D, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 317-328, 2009. 5)
No. 31, pp. 607-612, 1996.
6)
No. 35, pp. 697-702, 2000. 7) 2006. 8)
Vol. 42, No. I2, CD-ROM, 2010. 9)
D, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 46-53, 2010. 10) 1975. 11) 1981. 12)
No. 31-2, pp. 107-144, 1992. 13)
No. 33, pp. 5-690, 1998.
14) Vol. 38, No. 4,
pp. 26-34, 1999. 15) Space
SyntaxNo. 7, pp. 72-80, 2011.
16) No. 462, pp. 147-156, 1994.
17) Spreiregen, P. D.: Urban Design, the Architecture of Towns
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
74
-
and Cities, McGraw-Hill, p.77, 1965H.,
1966. 18)
1984. 19) 1799
http://www.nichibun.ac.jp
20) 1Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 19-24, 1983.
21) 1864
http://www.nichibun.ac.jp 22) 1911.
(2013. 1. 21 )
LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE AND VISUAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HIGASHIYAMA DISTRICT, KYOTO
—EVALUATING TOPOGRAPHIC ENCLOSURE BY OPENNESS—
Keita YAMAGUCHI, Takashi TSUCHIYA, Yoshiaki KUBOTA and Masashi KAWASAKI
This study aims at clarifying the landscape structure and its visual characteristics of the Higashiyama
district, Kyoto, by evaluating topographic enclosure by Openness and visualizing a distribution pattern of topographic enclosure. The results presented in this paper indicated that the area strongly enclosed by mountains ranged locally in the bottom of mountains and most of temples and scenic places located in these enclosed spaces. It is found that the spatial compositions in scenic places imply a traditional landscape design method of using topographic conditions and landscape characteristics. The main findings are described below: 1) in scenic places that were enclosed by mountains at a short distance, gardens were composed of spatially opened viewpoints created in the enclosed space. In scenic places that were enclosed by mountains at a middle distance, 2) gardens were composed of a contiguous view of mountain slopes and buildings, 3) spaces between a garden and mountains were hidden to combine views of gardens and mountains, 4) spatially opened viewpoints were created to get a view of a surrounding landscape. It is found that scenic places of the Higashiyama district are strongly characterized by the topographic enclosure that is one of significant features of religious spaces in Japan.
土木学会論文集D1(景観・デザイン), Vol. 69, No. 1, 64-75, 2013.
75