Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
-
Upload
negidigamber -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
1/31
Brand Identity Prism
(Kapferer)
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
2/31
KAPFERER represents brand identity diagrammatically asa six-sided prism as shown below:
Inte
rnalis
ation
Exte
rnalis
ation
Constructed Source/Sender
Constructed Receiver
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
3/31
Physique according to him is the basis of the brand.
E.G. the physique of Philips is technology and reliability while for thebrand Tata it is trust
Personality is same as Aaker, it answers the question whathappens to this brand when it becomes a person?
Culture symbolizes the organization, its country-of-origin and thevalues it stands for.
E.G. traditional brands like balsara, dabur and zandu.
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
4/31
Relationship is the handshake between consumer and theorganisation.
E.G. the relationship with safolais safety.
Reflection is the consumers perception for what the brands standsfor.
E.G. cokes image more attract youth.
Self- imageis what the consumer think of himself.
E.G. benzCar owner think that since he has bought the car he istreating himself to one of the best car in the world.
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
5/31
Let us understand the model in detail
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
6/31
What is a Brand???
A Brand is a complex symbol. It is the intangible sum of a products
attributes, its name, packaging and price, its history, reputation, and
the way its advertised. A brand is also defined by consumers
impression of people who use it, as well as their own experience
- David Ogilvy
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
7/31
Now let us look at howBrand Exper ienceis differentiated
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
8/31
Brand Experience are ofTwotypes
Brand Experience
External Internal
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
9/31
The External Brand Experience include
Name
Logo
Advertising Brand Identity
Environments
Products & Service
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
10/31
The Internal Brand Experience include
Business Process
Customer Relations
Brand Values Training
Quality
Staff Motivation
Recruitment Policies Technology etc..
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
11/31
Now let us look at the Brand Identity Prism based on Kapferer model
and the 6 key dimensions in it
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
12/31
Inte
rnalis
ation
Exte
rnalis
ation
Constructed Source
Constructed Receiver
-Business Process -Customer Relations-Brand Values -Training-Quality -Staff Motivation-Recruitment Policies -Technology etc..
-Name -Logo-Advertising -Brand Identity-Environments -Products & Service
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
13/31
Physical Product features, symbols & attributes
Personality Character & attitude
Relationship Beliefs & association
Culture Set of Values
Reflection Customers view of the brand
Self-Image Internal mirror of customer as user of brand
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
14/31
Let us now understand the prism with some examples
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
15/31
ForSify Ind ialet us look at how they have built the brand basis theKapferer Model
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
16/31
Sify India
Physical Kite Symbol, Online Access
Personality Innovative & Tech savvy
Culture Customer centric & Indian
Self -image "net" way of life empowered
Reflection Consistent & dependable performer
Relationship Best guide to the net
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
17/31
Let us now understand the prism in more detail with a case studyAdidas
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
18/31
Case Study Adidas (1)The company Adidas was founded in the early 1920s as Gebruder Dassler Schuhfabrik, in
Herzogenaurach in Germany. Adolf Dassler designed a pair of sport shoes in 1925 and few years later
he and his brother Rudolph were selling special shoes for tennis players and began design specificshoes for different sports. The family company split in 1948. After the split, Adolf (Adi) Dassler founded
Adidas and his brother Rudolph founded Puma. The three-stripe logo was designed in 1941 by Adi
Dassler and he registered it as a trademark for Adidas after the split.
The strength of Adidas was its product innovation. Adi Dassler registered more than seven hundred
patents. Adidas began selling its shoes in the United States after 1968 and in few years the company
dominated the American market. The most important marketing breakthrough was the active promotion
of global sporting events, especially the Olympics. The connection of Adidas to the Olympics has a rich
heritage. At the 1972 Olympic game in Munich, every official wore Adidas.
Activities: manufacture and distribution of textiles, shoes and appliances for sport and related products.
Adidas has 107 subsidiaries in 20 countries, and exports to 160 countries. Exploitation of the registered
trademark Adidas is made where ever it is an opportunity. Activities of the company and itssubsidiaries are directed from Adidas-Salomon AG's headquarters in Herzogenaurach, Germany.
Products: Adidas - Footwear, apparel, and hardware such as bags and balls. Salomon - Winter sports
incl. skis, snowboards, snowblades, ski boots and bindings, inline skates, hiking, apparel. MavicCycle
components, Bonfire Snowboard apparel. Arc'Teryx - Outdoor apparel, climbing equipment, Clich
Skateboard equipment, footwear and apparel, Taylor Made-Adidas Golf - Golf equipment, golf apparel,
golf shoes and finally, Maxfli - Golf balls, irons and accessories
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
19/31
Case Study Adidas (2)In the early 1980s Adidas has sales of $1 billion, and their brand-building model began to lose power.
In America, the largest sports market, Nike had built a successful business in part of riding the
explosive growth of running and jogging among casual users. Adidas focused mainly on athletes inteam sports so they did not participate in the boom of the 1980s. Mostly therefore Adidas was
overtaken by Nike at that time.
In 1990, Adidas was holding on to just a two to three percent share of the U.S. market. Between 1988
and 1992 Adidas total sales dropped from nearly $2 billion to $1.7 billion. In the same period, Nikes
sales went from $1.2 billion to more than $3.4 billion. From being the U.S. market leader in the late
1970s, Adidass market share dropped to 3 percent in 1992. The European market shares dropped
while Nikes shares grew.
Adidas also have had problems with the upstream value activities in their value chain. Traditionally, the
company have their own factories and wholly owned subsidiaries. What happened in the '70s and
forward, during the Adidas recession, was that Adidas was unable to ship products when it was
needed, and they had a long supply chain - it took 18 months to get a new shoe into the market. Thistime is now reduced by 50%. Methods used are e.g. reducing transporting times trough bypassing
warehouses and deliver directly to retailers. Today Adidas aims to have new products closer to the
market.
In 1997Adidas AG acquired the Salomon Group with the brands Salomon, Taylor Made, Mavic and
Bonfire. The new company is named Adidas-Salomon AG.
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
20/31
Research Problem
The strategies of Adidas were based on advertising, sponsorship programs for team end eventsand sub-brands
Among the similarities between the campaigns for Adidas and Nike we can see their strategies toadvertise in a huge scale
One difference is that Adidas Endorsement program is focusing on major global events, sportsassociations, and teams, and Nike, in contrast, focuses on individual athletes and their success
While Nike have Nike Town shops in the bigger cities in the world, Adidas have created TheAdidas Streetball Challenge which started out in Germany 1992 and five years later it had over500.000 participants
In the finals in Germany it attracted 3200 players and 40.000 spectators Both Nike and Adidas began their turnarounds by developing a brand identity
In each case, this exercise led to a focusing of the brand and initiatives that built the brand in newdirections
How have Adidas used the instrument branding, and which roll did it play in the
competition between Adidas and Nike?
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
21/31
Now let us do a Comparative analysis through Kapferers Prism model
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
22/31
Two aspects ofBrand Identity
Sender Receiver
Physique Personality Reflection Self-Image
Kapferer meanswhat the central
purpose of the brand
is (that is what thebrand does)
Kapferer means thesoul of the brand
Kapferer means howthe individual in the
targeted group
identify himself as aperson in relation to
the brand
Kapferer means howthe individual in the
targeted group
identify the brand inrelation to himself
Two dimensions are still left to be explained in the prism, the Relationship and the
Culture
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
23/31
The Relat ionshipis, according to Kapferer, externalizing the brand from the
company outwards, and the culture is an aid for internalizing the brand in the
organization and in to the conscious of the customer
The Cultureis, according to Kapferer, the strongest dimension in the prism. It
represents the difference between one brand and another
Now let us look at the prism of Adidas and Nike
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
24/31
Adidas
Picture of Sender
Picture of Receiver
PersonalityTraditional, conservative,collective
PhysiqueSports and fitness
RelationshipQuality and heritage CultureEuropean, Traditional
Intern
alization
Extern
alization
ReflectionTrue sportsmanship, Agood team player, Strong
work ethic
Self ImageRelates more to competingthan to winning
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
25/31
Nike
Picture of Sender
Picture of Receiver
PersonalityLike Jordan, WoodsPhysiqueSports and fitness
RelationshipSponsorship, ethics CultureAmerican, Just do it!
Intern
alization
Extern
alization
ReflectionAggressive, provocation,in- your face
Self ImageCool, I am an athlete
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
26/31
Adidas
Picture of Sender
Picture of Receiver
PersonalityTraditional,
conservative,collective
PhysiqueSports and fitness
RelationshipQuality and
heritage
Culture
European,Traditional
Internalization
Externalization Reflection
True sportsmanship, A goodteam player, Strong work ethic
Self ImageRelates more to competing than
to winning
Nike
Picture of Sender
Picture of Receiver
PhysiqueSports and fitness
Interna
lization
Externa
lization
PersonalityLike Jordan,
Woods
RelationshipSponsorship,
ethics
Culture
American, Just doit!
ReflectionAggressive, provocation, in-
your face
Self ImageCool, I am an
athlete
Comparative Analysis
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
27/31
Comparative Analysis (1) Nike centred their brand equity model on the platforms, the endorsement focus strategy, creating a
dominant media presence, development of Flagship stores, Nike Town and sub-branding
The Adidas strategies were based on, endorsement focus strategy, advertising, sponsorshipprograms focusing on major global events, sports associations, and teams, and sub-brands
To create brand awareness both companies have been using endorsement strategies in theirbrand-building programs
What differs is that Adidas focuses on sponsorship of teams and events e.g. national teams andbig sport events like the Olympic Games and different World Championship events. This will helpthem to create awareness with help from different types of media
In contrast Nike has their focus on individuals like M. Jordan and T. Woods and their successstories
About the second strategy, advertising Nikes advertising strategy was to create dominantpresence in media. Nike created media presence in several trend setting United States cities. TVads linking Nike to a city were used, but real drivers were huge oversized billboards and murals onbuildings that blanketed cities with messages featuring key Nike-sponsored athletes, not products
Adidas took up the competition with Nike through raising their advertising budget to a level that
made it possible to compete with Nike on the same conditions and the same strength as Nike didto capture the consumer interest
Adidas did not just spend more money; they made an impact with brilliant executions. They
made TV and other advertising campaigns. The company communicate their heritage ofinnovation, technology and big success stories with personalities like Emil Zatopek, Mohammad Ali
Adidas tried to spread meanings like We know then- we know now and There is nothing betweenyou and success, so exceed your own expectations and limitations and Earn it
The success was obvious and after hard work and striving toward a top position in the industryAdidas was back in business.
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
28/31
Comparative Analysis (2) Nikes third strategy was to develop, flag ship stores, Nike Town shops in bigger citys, first
national, and then abroad
Nike was the first company to establish flagship stores and it turned out to be a sensation
Adidas choice was to experiment with sport events, with which they made great success.Examples of that is the Adidas Streetball Challenge a local three-person team basketballtournament, this event started out as a trail in Berlin in the beginning of the 1990s as one timeoccasion
In the mid 1990s it had become a huge sport event with about 500.000 participants all over thebigger cities in Europe
In the finals in Germany it attracted 3200 players and 40.000 spectators
Adidas made hereby a brand-building success
The Nike customer associated the Nike brand with words like sports, attitudes and life style.Reasons for that is one can relate to or identify one self to Nikes marketing campaigns like Justdo it and the companies front athletes like Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods. For Adidas oneimage study of consumers found the brand very trendy, modern and cool
The survey was made in late 1990s. All marketing actions that both companies are implementing
will hopefully result in loyal customers Adidas introduced a sub-brand in 1990 to serve the high-end products for all categories of shoes
and apparel. The Equipment sub-brand would represent the best, whatever the product was
The low-end products, for the normal consumer still have a high technology and level ofinnovation because of their inheritance of the older innovations and technology from the Equipmentline
This strategy made the Adidas brand take on a different meaning; it still meant participation,
emotion and performance
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
29/31
Comparative Analysis (3) This was a success strategy for Adidas so successful that Nike copied their idea and introduced
their own line, the Alpha line, based on the same idea
Nike advanced from $1 billion dollars in 1986 to $ 9.9 billion in 2002, Adidas advanced from $1.7billion in 1992 to $4.8 billion in 1998
According to sales figures for the both companies, it seems that both Nike and Adidas companieshave succeeded to create a brand loyal customer who perceives the Nike and Adidas products astop quality
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
30/31
Conclusion (1) Both Adidas and Nike have used the same theoretical systems to create their brand building
programs
The companies are benchmarking each other, using the techniques from each others successes,when Nike launched their sub-brand product Alpha line which was benchmarked on Adidas alreadylaunched sub-brand of the Equipment product line for the elite of sports men
We can find many similarities like endorsements strategies and the companies advertisingstrategies but what differs in the endorsement strategies is that Adidas focuses in sponsoringteams and global events, while Nike have their center of attention on stars in specific sport likebasketball and Michael Jordan or in golf and Tiger Woods
About advertising both companies have about the same scale and scope of advertising but they try
to communicate different messages
The messages from Adidas is; the only one you compete with is your self whereas Nikecommunicate a provocative, aggressive winner attitude which can be related to the Americansports attitude You dont win silver, you lose gold
As we can understand the two companies are aiming at nearly the same targeted customer groupbut with a slightly differentiation of attitude
Adidas stand for a competing and winning over your self-attitude, and Nike stands for a winningover everyone attitude
The differentiation is based on the differences in culture between the two companies and betweenEurope and USA
As an overall reflection one can see that Adidas had to overcome, that the both companies had the
same target group. Adidas choose a brand-building strategy that built on the same theoreticalcriterias as Nike. But they created a differentiation in identity of the brand (as seen comparing
analysis in the Kapferer Prism Model above) compared to Nike
-
7/27/2019 Kapferer Modelbrand Identity Prism 1228214291948754 9
31/31
Conclusion (2) Adidas had the same strategy within creating equity value to their brand
They challenged Nike in endorsement strategy, and in advertising, but with a slight difference incommunicated message, by doing it trough the same medias. To differentiate them self and maketotally own awareness activities, events like Adidas Streetball Challenge was created. Events likethose communicated the Adidas brand around the world
According to the results and positions the brand-building programs have given both Adidas andNike in the sport industry, one can say that branding have been a totally determining factor. On topof that they made it so good that they are used as models in higher education.