Journal of Cultural Enterprise P. 41~ 64 台灣與香港國中科技教育 …

23
______________________________ *國立台灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系 教授 **國立台灣師範大學科技應用與人力資源發展學系 博士生 台中市立神岡國中 校長 文化事業與管理研究 2 0 1 1 1 2 4 1 6 4 Journal of Cultural Enterprise and Management No.8 December, 2011 P. 41~ 64 台灣與香港國中科技教育課程之比較 楊錦心 * 楊憲章 ** 本文是採用 Bereday 之描述、解釋、並排與比較的比較教育研究方法與步驟,旨在探 討台灣與香港之國中科技課程並做比較及分析,其中台灣是參考教育部 2003 年版九年一 貫課程中之「自然與生活科技」學習領域爲依據,香港則是參考香港特別行政區教育暑 2002 年版科學教育學習領域課程指引」為基礎。主要內容包括台灣與香港的教育制度 及科技課程內容。就教育制度而言,主要簡介兩地國中的課程設計,如授課時數與修課 規定。科技課程內容則簡介兩地科技課程綱要的教育目標、課程比較對照分析。 此研究主要可歸納出幾項結論: 1)香港重視科技教育,且積極與明確,臺灣輕忽。 2)臺灣與香港皆重視能力標準,但香港較具連續性、統整性與順序性。 3)臺灣與香港皆強調多元評量,但香港較爲嚴謹與落實。 4)臺灣的科技教育已逐漸接納香港系統之設計與科技課程。 5)臺灣未來之十二年國民基本教育能力檢測應重視科技課程。 關鍵詞:國中、科技教育課程、比較研究

Transcript of Journal of Cultural Enterprise P. 41~ 64 台灣與香港國中科技教育 …


4 1 6 4
Journal of Cultural Enterprise
a n d M a n a g e m e n t N o . 8
December, 2011
2003

2002

A Comparative Research of the Curriculum of Technology Education at
Secondary School Stages between
Hong Kong and Taiwan
Borrowing Bereday’s descriptive, interpretative, juxtaposition, and comparative
educational research methodology. The purpose of the study is to compare the differences of
the curriculum of technology education at secondary stages between Hong Kong and Taiwan.
The curriculum of technology education in Taiwan is based on the ideas of the learning
domain---Science & Living Technology in the outline of the Nine Year Joint Curriculum
released by the Ministry of Education in 2001. As for the curriculum of technology education in
Hong Kong, it is based on the curricular structure of Reference Education Summer H.K Special
Administrative Region, "2002 version of the Science Education KLA Curriculum Guide".The
main contents include Taiwan and Hong Kong's education system and technology curriculum.
The education system is concerned, About two main curriculum of secondary schools, example
the number of teaching hours and course requirements.
Introduction to Technology course is both to outline the aims of education technology,
curriculum Compare and contrast analysis.
This study several conclusions can be drawn:

43
(1)Emphasis on science and technology education in Hong Kong, and positive and clear,
Taiwan overlooked.
(2) the ability of all pay attention to Taiwan and Hong Kong Standard, Hong Kong more
continuity, integration and sequence.
(3) Taiwan's education system has been gradually accepted by the British Design and
Technology courses.
(4) Taiwan and Hong Kong were given to science education, but more active and clear in Hong
Kong, multiple assessments are emphasized, but Hong Kong and the implementation of more
stringent
(5)Taiwan's future ability to detect twelve national basic education curriculum should pay
attention to science and technology
Keywords: Junior High School ,Technology Education Curriculum, Comparative Studies


PISA (2010)
2009
1-13

2009 D&T
Bereday2000


(13-15 )(16-18 )/ 1922


1962(industrial
arts education)







(
)()













1

(1)(2)
(1)(2)
(3)


(4)
(
)() 3


111
320

(Technology Education)(Design andTechnology)
(2)(3)


4
4
20% 10%


28 30
/ 28×430×2172
/ 172×10%÷62.9
/ 2.9×25.8
20~25%
1 45 8 15
220 413
25 35 689 964
2 6
6
(2002)(2002)
d
( 4)( 8)
4 8(2000)

:(1) :






(6)



)(
)/(
1993)
Bereday




(2004)37(4)78
(1993)/
61-85
http://www.info.gov.hk/emb/about/orgchart.html
http://www.info.gov.hk/emb/index.htm